Shelby Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 44.8 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interviews, review of the facility fall investigation report, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a neurological evaluation were timely initiated after a resident fall with reported head injury. This affected one (#02) out of the three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed an admission date of 09/04/25 with medical diagnoses of acute respiratory failure, anemia, Alzheimer's disease, heart failure, and hypertension. Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #02 had severe cognitive impairment and required substantial/maximum staff assistance with toilet hygiene, supervision with transfers and bed mobility, and set-up assistance with eating. Review of the medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify a physician of resident's weight loss. This affected one (#13) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The census was 46. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #13 revealed admission date of 07/21/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, hypothyroidism, epilepsy, history of Hodgkin lymphoma, and stroke. The resident was documented as hospitalized on [DATE] and returned on 08/14/24, and had a second hospitalization on 08/19/24 and returned on 08/23/24. The resident remained in the facility during the survey. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was assessed with moderately impaired cognition, required supervision for eating, and maximum assistance for transfers, bed mobility, and toileting hygiene. Review of Resident #13's electronic medical record revealed the resident weighed 225.0 pounds on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely implement treatment of a wound. This affected one (#13) of 12 residents reviewed for treatments. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 07/21/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, hypothyroidism, epilepsy, history of Hodgkin's Lymphoma and stroke. The resident remained in the facility. Review of Resident #13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed with moderately impaired cognition, required supervision for eating, and maximum assistance for transfers, bed mobility and toileting hygiene. Review of Resident #13's current care plan revealed a focus area for impaired skin integrity related to fragile skin, altered sensations, and impaired mobility. Interventions included to inspect skin during routine care, pad and protect skin as needed, and pericare…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide timely interventions to address resident weight loss. This affected one (#13) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The census was 46. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 07/21/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, hypothyroidism, epilepsy, history of Hodgkin lymphoma, and stroke. The resident was documented as hospitalized on [DATE] and returned on 08/14/24 and had a second hospitalization on 08/19/24 and returned on 08/23/24. Review of Resident #13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed with moderately impaired cognition, required supervision for eating, and maximum assistance for transfers, bed mobility, and toileting hygiene. Review of Resident #13's electronic medical record revealed the resident weighed 225.0 pounds…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a policy, the facility failed to ensure a blood pressure medication was held per ordered parameters. This affected one (#93) of six reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 46. Findings include: Review of Resident #93's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/12/24. Diagnoses listed included skin cancer, enlarged lymph nodes, cerebral infarction, muscle weakness, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #93 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #93's physician orders revealed an order dated 08/13/24 to give metoprolol tartrate (blood pressure medication) 50 milligrams (mg) one tablet via gastronomy tube (G-tube) three times a day for hypertension with instructions to hold if the heart rate (HR) was less than 65 beats per minute. Review of Resident #93's August 2024 medication administration record (MAR) revealed metoprolol tartrate 50 mg was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely implement infection control precautions for residents with infections. This affected one (#13) of eight residents reviewed for infection control. The census was 46. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 07/21/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, hypothyroidism, epilepsy, history of Hodgkin's lymphoma, and stroke. Review of Resident #13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed with moderate cognitive impairment, required supervision for eating, and maximum assistance for transfers, bed mobility, and toileting hygiene. Review of Resident #13's nursing progress notes dated 08/23/24 revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility with a diagnosis of a bacterial infection, Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL). Review of the current plan of care revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record reviews, staff and resident interviews, facility investigation reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident's medications were administered as ordered resulting in significant medication errors. This affected two (#12 and #13) out of four reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 36. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 06/06/23 with medical diagnoses of osteoarthritis, gout, hyperparathyroidism, diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity, end stage renal disease (ESRD), and atrial fibrillation. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/19/24, which indicated Resident #13 was cognitively intact and required moderate staff assistance with toilet hygiene and bed mobility and maximum staff assistance with bathing and transfers. Review of a facility investigation report,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record contained documentation involving a medication error. This affected one (#13) out of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 06/06/23 with medical diagnoses of osteoarthritis, gout, hyperparathyroidism, diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity, end stage renal disease (ESRD), and atrial fibrillation. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/19/24, which indicated Resident #13 was cognitively intact and required moderate staff assistance with toilet hygiene and bed mobility and maximum staff assistance with bathing and transfers. Review of a facility investigation report, dated 04/10/24, stated Resident #13 was inadvertently administered a dose of Lyrica in error. The report did not indicate the dose of Lyrica that was administered. The report stated Resident #13…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control procedures during medication administration. This affected one (#14) resident out of the two residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 01/22/24 with medical diagnoses of hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and encephalopathy. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/29/24, which indicated Resident #14 had severe cognitive impairment and required maximum staff assistance with toilet hygiene and bathing, moderate staff assistance with bed mobility and supervision with eating. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed physician orders dated 01/22/24 for carvedilol 3.125 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth every 12 hours; levetiracetam 500 mg one tablet by mouth two times per day; and senna plus 8.6 mg one tablet by mouth two times per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with showers. This affected one (#21) out of four residents reviewed for showering. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included spinal stenosis. Review of the care plan dated 09/22/23 revealed Resident #21 was at risk for decline in activities of daily living (ADL) function related to weakness alteration in ADL performance/participation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident requires partial assistance for toileting hygiene, bathing, lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. Review of the MDS also revealed Resident #21 was cognitively intact. Review of physician order dated 03/15/24 revealed an order for Vitamin A & Vitamin D (A&D) Ointment to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MICHAEL SLYK — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $263K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH