Auburn Skilled Nursing And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 87 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.67 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 44 beds and averages 39.4 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain the unit refrigerator in a sanitary manner that followed acceptable standards of food safety. This had the potential to affect 37 residents receiving meals from the kitchen as Resident #14 and Resident #35 were ordered nothing-by-mouth (NPO). Facility census was 39 residents.Findings include:Observation on 02/20/26 at 10:15 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #130 revealed a refrigerator on the unit used for resident food which contained an undated opened bottle of Amish orange juice, an undated and unlabeled tub of tuna salad and an undated and unlabeled tub of egg salad in addition to a black Styrofoam container with the date 02/11/26 and Resident #17's last name on it. LPN #130 verified the unlabeled and undated foods at the time of observation and indicated housekeeping staff was responsible for maintaining this refrigerator.Interview on 02/20/26 at 10:20 A.M. with Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor (HLS) #103 revealed the observed egg salad and tuna salad was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain proper food storage in the kitchen to prevent potential contamination and spoilage. This had the potential to affect all residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified three residents (Resident #9, Resident #6, and Resident #5) as NPO (Nothing by mouth), who were not affected. The facility census was 42.Findings include: On 09/02/2025 at 8:50 A.M., an observation of the kitchen revealed a 16-ounce (oz) box of Barley which was opened and uncovered in the dry pantry. This was verified at that time by DM #165. On 09/02/2025 at 8:52 A.M., an observation of the kitchen revealed a dented 50 oz can of Campbell's Chicken Noodle Soup on the dry pantry shelf. This was verified at that time by DM #165.On 09/02/2025 at 9:00 A.M., an observation of the stand-up freezer revealed a package of approximately 25 frozen hot dogs, which was opened and unsealed, exposing the hot dogs to the freezer air. This was verified at the time of observation by the DM #165.On 09/02/2025 at 9:01 A.M., an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, interview, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Guideline for Isolation Precautions, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely implement orders for contact isolation for Resident #9 and ensure staff donned adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering isolation rooms. This affected one resident (#9) of five reviewed for infection control. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene during medication administration. This affected four residents (#7, #16, #21 and #27) of 10 observed for medication administration. The facility census was 42.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 08/01/25 with diagnoses including dementia, atrial fibrillation, and dysphagia. Review of the progress note dated 08/13/25 at 12:56 A.M. revealed Resident #9 had a loose stool or diarrhea and the physician was notified. The note dated 08/14/25 at 10:36 P.M. revealed Resident #9's lab results indicated a positive result for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review, and staff/Resident interviews, the facility failed to maintain the dignity and privacy of one resident (Resident #07) of five residents reviewed for dignity and privacy. The facility census was 42.Findings Include: Review of medical record of Resident #07 revealed initial admission to facility on 04/22/25 for diagnosis including metabolic encephalopathy, pneumonia, chronic respiratory failure, high blood pressure, major depression and anxiety, spinal cord injury, and chronic lung disease. Review of the medical record for Resident #07 revealed the Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS 3.0) indicated Resident #07 required moderate to substantial assistance with personal care and was dependent on wheelchair for mobility. Observation on 09/02/25 at 9:50 A.M. revealed Resident #07 in bed with bilateral heel boots on and flannel pajama pants noted to be pulled down to below the resident ' s knees, above the boots and a sheet laying across the resident's midsection. Resident #07 reported that they do this at night in case I have an accident, and I need changed, it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach, and failed to provide functional furniture to accommodate resident needs. This affected two (Resident #12 and Resident #16) of two residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 42.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 12/02/23. Diagnoses included but were not limited to alopecia; cognitive communication deficit; unsteadiness on feet; hyperlipidemia; generalized anxiety disorder; essential hypertension; glaucoma; and cataracts.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 out of a possible 15, indicating intact cognition. Section B of the MDS indicated the resident had moderate difficulty hearing with a device, her speech was unclear, and her vision was moderately impaired with no corrective lenses. On 09/02/2025 at 9:00 A.M., an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to paper towels. This affected one (Resident #8) of three residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 42.Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including collapsed vertebra of the thoracic region, diabetes mellitus, concussion, depression, morbid obesity, and asthma. Review of the 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/25/25, revealed Resident #8 had intact cognition. The MDS further revealed Resident #8 required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the Care Plan, dated 08/25/25, revealed Resident #8 had the potential for an alteration in activities with interventions including to allow the resident the opportunity to express opinions of activities of choice and to interview the resident quarterly and as needed for activities of choice. Interview on 09/02/25 at 11:56 A.M. with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to complete an activities assessment timely to ensure residents participated in group activities and/or preferred activities. This affected one (Resident #8) of one resident reviewed for activities. The facility census was 42.Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including collapsed vertebra of the thoracic region, diabetes mellitus, concussion, depression, morbid obesity, and asthma.Review of the 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/25/25, revealed Resident #8 had intact cognition. The MDS further revealed Resident #8 required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the Care Plan, dated 08/25/25, revealed Resident #8 had the potential for an alteration in activities with interventions including to allow the resident the opportunity to express opinions of activities of choice and to interview the resident quarterly and as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to address pharmacy recommendations for medication dosage adjustments for three of five Residents (Resident #04, #25, #1) reviewed for gradual dose reduction (GDR) monitoring. The facility census was 42.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed admission to facility on 02/25/25 with diagnosis including heart attack, dementia with moderate agitation, protein malnutrition, repeated falls, high blood pressure, cancer of abdomen, heart failure, anxiety. Review of Resident #25's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS 3.0) completed on 07/02/25 revealed the brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15 indicating severe impairment. Further review of Resident #25's medical record revealed a pharmacist note dated 05/19/25 which recommended a gradual dose reduction for Trazodone (antidepressant) 50 milligrams (mg) by mouth once daily at bedtime for sleep. Further record review revealed a physician note by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored for residents identified as being able to self-administer medications. This affected one resident (Resident #16) of one residents reviewed for secured medication. The census was 42.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 12/02/23. Diagnoses included but were not limited to alopecia; cognitive communication deficit; unsteadiness on feet; hyperlipidemia; generalized anxiety disorder; essential hypertension; glaucoma; and cataracts.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14. A BIMS score of 13 to 15 points would suggest cognitive intactness. Section B of the MDS indicated the resident had moderate difficulty hearing with a device, her speech was unclear, and her vision was moderately impaired with no corrective lenses.Record review of a hard chart for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to accurately document influenza, pneumococcal, and Covid-19 vaccination consents for three residents (Residents #07, #12 and #15) of the five residents reviewed for vaccinations. The facility census was 42Findings Include: 1. Review of medical record of Resident #07 revealed initial admission to facility on 04/22/25 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, pneumonia, chronic respiratory failure, high blood pressure, major depression and anxiety, spinal cord injury, and chronic lung disease.Review of Resident #07's influenza/pneumococcal vaccination consent signed on 04/23/25 revealed a question asking if Resident #07 had received the influenza/pneumococcal vaccine prior. There was a check marked by the word No after this question. No dates were entered for prior pneumococcal vaccinations. Resident #07 declined the pneumococcal vaccine. Further review of the consent revealed the Vaccine Information Sheet (VIS) was provided on 04/23/25 for the pneumococcal vaccine and 04/23/25 for the influenza vaccine.Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MICHAEL SLYK — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $901K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH