Stillwater Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 52.2 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 2% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to properly store the resident medications. This had the potential to affect the seven residents with medications stored in the [NAME] Hall cart. The facility census was 46 residents.Findings include: Observation 04/15/26 at 8:20 A.M. of [NAME] Hall medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #160 revealed there were six loose pills of different sizes, shapes, and colors at the bottom of the cart drawer under the resident medication cards. Interview on 04/15/26 at 8:20 A.M. with LPN #160 confirmed the medication cart drawer had six loose pills at the bottom of the drawer. LPN #160 stated all medications should stored in their original containers and should be discarded if the medication fell to the bottom of the drawer. Review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications revised April 2019 revealed all drugs and biologicals should be stored a safe, secure, and orderly manner and should be stored in packing, container, or other dispensing systems in which they were received.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan included the resident preferences and refusals of cares/services for laryngectomy tube. This affected one (Resident #8) of two residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 46 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 01/05/24 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of larynx, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and tracheostomy status. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #8 dated 01/07/26 revealed the resident was cognitively intact, required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), and received tracheostomy care. Review of the care plan for Resident #8 dated 06/25/25 which stated the resident had laryngeal tube with a history of cutting edge/lip of the tube, stating it was too long. Interventions included the following: ensure tube…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a replacement laryngectomy tube (used to keep neck stoma open and to provide a permanent, total airway separation) was at the resident's bedside or easily accessible for staff use. This affected one (Resident #8) of one facility-identified resident with laryngectomy tube. The facility census was 46 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 01/05/24 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of larynx, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and tracheostomy status. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #8 dated 01/07/26 revealed the resident was cognitively intact, required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), and received tracheostomy care. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #8 revealed an order dated 11/10/25 to remove the laryngectomy tube from the stoma and cleanse the stoma site…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary medications. This affected one (Resident #22) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 46 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 10/24/25 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and malignant neoplasm of bronchus and lung. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #22 revealed an order dated 10/27/25 for Azithromycin 250 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for infection. Review of the care plan for Resident #22 dated 11/13/25 revealed the resident had signs and symptoms of respiratory infection/COPD exacerbation and was on long term antibiotic for COPD. The goal was for the resident to be free from signs and symptoms of pneumonia /respiratory infection after completion of antibiotics, administer antibiotics as ordered. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of five percent (%) or lower. The medication error rate was 7.4% based on two errors out of 27 medication opportunities. This affected one (Resident #34) of the four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 46 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 07/26/24 with diagnoses including hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, asthma, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #34 dated 01/31/26 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the physician's orders for Resident #34 dated April 2026 revealed orders for the following 12 morning medications: Eliquis, Claritin, Norco, Lasix- hold if blood pressure less than 120/80, Wellbutrin, amlodipine besylate-hold for blood pressure less than 120/80, allopurinol,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement the antibiotic stewardship plan and failed to properly monitor antibiotic use. This affected one (Resident #22) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 46 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 10/24/25 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and malignant neoplasm of bronchus and lung. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #22 revealed an order dated 10/27/25 for Azithromycin 250 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for infection. Review of the care plan for Resident #22 dated 11/13/25 revealed the resident had signs and symptoms of respiratory infection/COPD exacerbation and was on long term antibiotic for COPD. The goal was for the resident to be free from signs and symptoms of pneumonia /respiratory infection after completion of antibiotics, administer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-23 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of the incident log, review of police statement, review of staff drug screening results, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident's controlled substances were not misappropriated. This affected four (#18, #31, #50 and #78) of five residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 09/29/23 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes, and vascular dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 is cognitively intact. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #18 had an active order for Oxycodone. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 12/26/24 with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to implement their policy to ensure residents with enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) have clear signage and/or instruction on their doors indicating required personal protective equipment (PPE) and care activities that require PPE. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff have awareness of the EBP policy and what PPE to use. This affected nine (#13, #18, #20, #30, #34, #39, #42, #43 and #56) out of nine residents reviewed for EBP. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 12/19/24. Medical diagnoses included acute embolism and thrombosis of left femoral vein. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #34's care plan dated 10/06/25 revealed the resident required enhanced barrier precautions due to a complex wound/wound care. Medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0559 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, interviews with staff and Resident Representative, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident Representative was notified of room change prior to a room change. This affected one resident (#54) out of the three residents reviewed for room change notification. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 10/19/23 with medical diagnoses of mild neurocognitive disorder due to known physiological condition with behavioral disturbances, degenerative disease of the nervous system, depression, dementia, and cerebral atherosclerosis. Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/09/25, which indicated Resident #54 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent upon staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed the resident had room moves on 01/01/25, 02/27/25 and on 04/14/25. Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of policies, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician's order, resulting in a medication error rate which exceeded 5 percent (%). Thirty-five opportunities were observed with four medications errors, resulting in 11.42% error rate. This affected three (#1, #33, #43) of three residents observed during medications administration. The census was 61. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical chart for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 09/02/15, with diagnosis included hyperlipidemia. Review of the physician's order dated 06/20/23, for Resident #1, revealed an order for Fish Oil 500 milligrams (mg) tablet to give two tablets, one time a day for supplement. Observation of medication administration with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #151 on 08/22/23 at 7:15 A.M., to Resident #1, revealed LPN #151 gave Fish Oil 1000 mg 2 tablets by mouth. Interview with LPN #151 on 08/22/23 at 8:52 A.M., verified she gave Resident #1 Fish Oil 1000 mg two tablets by mouth. Interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MICHAEL SLYK — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $390K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH