Greenfield Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.71 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 37.1 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) determined whether the self-administration of a topical medication was clinically appropriate. This affected one (Resident #09) of one resident reviewed for self-administration. The facility census was 39 residents.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #09 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included edema, cellulitis, malignant neoplasm of skin, and local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue.Review of Resident #09's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and had edema and one venous ulcer.Review of Resident #09's prescriber orders revealed an order dated 11/12/25 for triamcinolone acetonide external cream 0.1% (a steroid cream) apply to rash to bilateral arms topically every shift and an order dated 11/12/25 for triamcinolone…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a plan of care for residents with a gastrostomy tube and receiving tube feedings. This affected one (Resident #07) of two residents reviewed for enteral tube feeding care plans. The facility census was 39.Findings Included:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #07 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes mellitus type II, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, atherosclerosis, protein-calorie malnutrition, morbid obesity, hyperlipidemia, chronic pain, sciatica, asthma, cerebral infarction, anxiety, depression, and epilepsy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #07 had minimally impaired cognition.Review of Resident #07's current comprehensive care plan, last revised on 04/19/26, revealed there was no care plan in place to address Resident #07's care needs addressing tube feedings when she readmitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews, facility policy review, review of job descriptions, and review of information from the Ohio Board of Nursing, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer interventions were implemented timely and weekly assessments, including staging, were completed per the professional standards of practice for Resident #28. This affected one (Resident #28) out of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The facility census was 39.Findings Included:Review of the medical record for Resident #28, revealed an admission date of 03/11/25. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction due to embolism of right middle cerebral artery, heart failure, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, weakness and muscle weakness and multiple sclerosis.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of cognitive intactness. Resident #28 was assessed to require total dependence on bed mobility, transfers, toilet hygiene, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to accurately transcribe, clarify and follow a prescriber's order for a resident who was on a voiding trial after removal of a Foley catheter. This affected one (Resident #06) of five residents with indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 39 residents.Findings include:Review of Resident #06's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 02/26/26 and a readmission date of 04/08/26. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease stage three, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #06 had a urinary catheter upon admission.Review of Resident #06's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and had an indwelling urinary catheter in place. Review of Resident #06's care plan dated 03/17/26 revealed the resident had an alteration in elimination due to diabetes, chronic kidney disease…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0568 — pattern
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, review of resident fund account documentation, review of self reported incident, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate handling of resident funds. This affected four Residents (#6, #24, #42, #46) of four reviewed for resident funds. Facility identified 19 Residents (#2, #3, #6, #7, #8, #15, #19, #21, #24, #25, #26, #29, #37, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47) potentially affected by the accounting practice. Facility census was 41. Findings include 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 02/21/21 and discharge date of 08/06/25. Diagnoses included displaced fracture of the right leg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), muscle weakness, and unspecified dementia without behaviors. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of five. Review of fund authorization form dated 04/10/18…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, self-reported incident (SRI) review, review of the facility investigation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for Resident #51 who had an allegation of abuse and for Residents #7, #42, and #46 who were involved with an allegation of misappropriation. This affected four residents (#7, #42, #46, and #51) out of four reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation. The facility identified 19 residents (#2, #3, #6, #7, #8, #15, #19, #21, #24, #25, #26, #29, #37, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47) who were potentially affected by the accounting practices related to the misappropriation SRI #261495 and one resident (#51) identified in the abuse SRI #262018. The facility census was 41.Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 03/18/25 and a discharge date of 07/25/25. Diagnoses included chronic pulmonary disease, fracture of the left femur, and bipolar…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, review of resident fund account documentation, review of self reported incident investigation, staff interviews, and policy review, facility failed to ensure residents were free from the potential of misappropriation. This affected three Residents (#7 #42 and #46) of three reviewed for misappropriation. Facility census was 41. Findings include 1.Review of the medical record for Resident # 42 revealed an admission date of 02/21/21 and discharge date of 08/06/25. Diagnoses included displaced fracture of the right leg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), muscle weakness, and unspecified dementia without behaviors. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was cognitively impaired with a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of five. Review of facility Self Reported Incident (SRI) #261495 investigation dated 06/10/25 to 06/13/25 revealed Social Services (SS) #210 had asked an Activity Aide (AA) #185 to have a resident sign a blank…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge plan was implemented. This affected one resident (#48) of three reviewed for discharge planning. The facility census was 41. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 02/19/25 and a discharge date of 05/22/25. Diagnoses included pulmonary disease, respiratory failure, embolism of thoracic aorta, cerebral infarct, bipolar disorder, schizophreniform disorder, skin picking disorder and neuropathy.Review of the plan of care dated 03/05/25 revealed Resident #48 would possibly require discharge planning with interventions to provide information on community resources and utilize resources (for example: home health care) and participate in therapy.Review of the communication in the insurance portal with [NAME] on 05/14/25 revealed Resident #48 had seven benefit days remaining before benefits ran out. The message instructed facility to begin discharge planning.Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served in a safe and sanitary manner to prevent foodborne illness. This affected all 42 residents who received food from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 42. Findings include: 1. Observation of the milk cooler in the kitchen on 12/02/24 at 9:26 A.M. revealed there were two gallons of milk that were opened with an expiration date of 11/30/24. Interview on 12/02/24 at 9:26 A.M. with [NAME] #27 verified there were two gallons of open milk with an expiration date of 11/30/24 in the milk cooler in the kitchen. Review of the facility's food receiving and storage policy, dated October 2017, revealed food should be stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. 2. Observation on 12/04/24 from 8:02 A.M. to 8:22 A.M. revealed Dietary Manager (DM) #34 was serving breakfast meal to all residents. DM #34 wore gloves and had a towel draped on his shoulder. DM #34 had facial hair and was not wearing a protective facial hair restraint. DM #34 was observed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, review of a facility provided resident list, and review of a menu spreadsheet, the facility failed to ensure residents received food portions based on the menu spreadsheet. This affected 17 (#02, #04, #05, #06, #07, #09, #11, #12, #13, #14, #23, #30, #32, #33, #36, #38 and #40) of 17 residents that received mechanical soft or pureed diets in a facility census of 42. Findings include: Review of the facility's menu spreadsheet for lunch on 12/04/24 revealed mechanical soft diets were to receive four (4) ounces (oz.) of mechanical roast beef, two (2) oz. of gravy, 4 oz. of garlic mashed potatoes, 4 oz. of Normandy vegetable blend, and one slice of wheat bread. Further review revealed pureed diets were to receive 4 oz. of pureed roast beef, two and two-thirds oz. of pureed Normandy vegetable blend, two-thirds slice of pureed bread, and 4 oz. of mashed potatoes. Observation of tray line on 12/04/24 at 11:45 A.M. revealed Dietary Manager (DM) #34 serving residents during the lunch meal. DM #34 provided residents on a mechanical soft diet a 2 oz.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MICHAEL SLYK — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $269K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH