Northwood Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 66.8 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interviews, review of a facility investigation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff provided adequate supervision and intervention to prevent Resident #01, who had impaired cognition, was at risk for elopement, was housed on a secured memory care unit and who had a history of eloping from his bedroom window, from leaving the facility unsupervised. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when one resident (#01) was placed at potential risk for serious life-threatening harm and/or injury when the resident was displaying a change of condition and was observed pacing near the nurse's station and the resident was noted to be observing Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #110 closely. Resident #01 eloped from his bedroom window without staff knowledge and was found 2.3 miles from the facility, leaving a Dollar General store in a very busy area of town. This affected one (#01) of six residents reviewed for risk for elopement. The facility census…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and investigation, review the National Weather Forecast, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure a cognitively impaired resident, assessed to be at moderate risk for elopement from the facility and had previous attempts to elope, did not elope from the facility. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when Resident #26 was placed at risk for potential serious harm and/or injury when the resident eloped from the facility without staff knowledge and exited through the front door. The resident was missing for approximately six hours before being found approximately 3.9 miles from the facility, after accepting a ride from a neighbor of the facility, riding public transportation, accessing funds from the bank, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure they were free from significant medication errors when the nurse failed to administer medications according to the physician orders. This affected six (#39, #05, #49, #10, #40, #75) of seven residents reviewed for late medications. The census was 76. Findings include:1.Medical record review for Resident #75 revealed an admission date of 09/05/25. Medical diagnoses included acidosis, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and renal insufficiency. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #75 was cognitively intact. Review of the Medication Administration Audit Report dated 11/18/25 revealed the following medications were prescribed at 9:00 P.M., Pregabalin (anticonvulsant medication) capsule 25 milligrams (mg) to give one capsule two times a day, Atorvastatin (a cholesterol medication) Calcium Oral Tablet 40 mg to give one tablet at bedtime, Budesonide-Formoterol…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents with enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) had clear signage or instruction indicating required personal protective equipment (PPE) and care activities that require what PPE. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff have awareness of the EBP policy. This affected 11 (#02, #05, #06, #10, #12, #19, #34, #36, #56, #68 and #73) of 11 residents reviewed for EBP. Additionally, the facility failed to clean and disinfect durable medical equipment (DME) between residents. This affected two residents (#14 and #78) of three reviewed. The facility also failed to ensure gloves were changed in between residents and hands were washed in-between resident care and after resident care. This affected one (#72) of three resident reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 76. Findings include:Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care was provided. This affected one (#72) of three residents reviewed for incontinence. The census was 76. Findings include:Medical record review for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 07/27/21. Medical diagnoses included disorganized schizophrenia, heart failure, Alzheimer's disease, and cerebrovascular accident. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 was severely cognitively impaired. Her functional status was set up or clean-up assistance with eating, dependent for toileting and transfers. She was substantial/maximal assistance for bed mobility. She was frequently incontinent for bladder and always incontinent for bowel. Observation of incontinence care for Resident #72 on 11/19/25 at 6:16 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #56 revealed the resident's brief was saturated and had leaked a small amount onto the incontinence pad she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of the water temperature logs, and review of a plumbing invoice, the facility failed to ensure water temperatures were within normal limits. This affected one (#72) of three residents reviewed for water temperatures. The census was 76. Findings include:Medical record review for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 07/27/21. Medical diagnoses included disorganized schizophrenia, heart failure, Alzheimer's disease, and cerebrovascular accident. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 was severely cognitively impaired. Her functional status was set up or clean-up assistance with eating, dependent for toileting and transfers. She was substantial/maximal assistance for bed mobility. She was frequently incontinent of bladder and always incontinent for bowel. Review of an invoice from a plumbing company dated 11/11/25 revealed the mixing valve from the hot water had to be replaced. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 71 residents who reside at the facility. The facility census was 71. Findings include: An interview and observation during the initial tour of the kitchen on 06/11/24 at 10:26 A.M. with the Kitchen Supervisor (KS) #300 revealed the three compartment sink did not contain sanitizing solution to sanitize the dishes. KS #300 confirmed the facility has been out of sanitizer for the three compartment sink for several days. KS #300 confirmed the dirt, food debris, and black substance under [NAME] the three compartment sink and all along the walls throughout the kitchen and behind the equipment. KS #300 confirmed the cove base covering was tore off the wall under [NAME] the three compartment sink as well as a missing tile. KS #300 confirmed the trash cans in the kitchen have food debris and splattered substance running down the trash cans. KS #300…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was in place for a resident. This affected one (#68) of 24 residents reviewed for call light placement. The facility census was 76. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 03/26/23. Diagnoses included dementia, hypertension, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 was cognitively intact. Observations of the call light for Resident #68 on 10/03/23 at 9:14 A.M. and on 10/04/23 at 3:14 P.M. revealed the call light cord was hanging wrapped around the call light outlet and out of reach of the resident. At the time of the observations, Resident #68 said she didn't know where her call light was. Interview with State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #307 on 10/04/23 at 3:27 P.M. confirmed the call light wasn't within reach for Resident #68. Review of the policy titled Call…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) for Resident #62. This affected one (Resident #62) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/14/23. Diagnoses included catatonic schizophrenia (diagnosis upon admission on [DATE]), major depressive disorder, psychosis, and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #62's PASARR dated 06/20/23 revealed the PASARR had only mood disorder marked as a serious mental disorder. The PASARR did not include Resident #62's diagnosis of catanoic schizophrenia, which Resident #62 had the diagnosis since admission on [DATE]. Interview with Certified Operations Specialist #249 on 10/03/23 at 3:35 P.M. verified Resident #62 had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to allow the participation of the resident and/or resident representative in the comprehensive care plan when there was no evidence a care plan conference was conducted. This affected two (Resident #47 and #68) of two residents reviewed for care plan conferences. The facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 11/05/22. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of larynx, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stenosis of larynx, acute tracheitis without obstruction, malignant neoplasm of laryngeal cartilage, shortness or breath, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was cognitively intact. Further review of the medical record revealed there was no evidence of care planning conferences from 11/05/22 to 10/02/23. Interview with Resident #47 on 10/02/23 at 10:45 A.M. revealed he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the hospice contract, the facility failed to ensure hospice services were provided and documentation of the services and care provided to a resident receiving hospice services were available at the facility. This affected one (Resident #15) of two residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 08/11/22. Diagnoses included dementia, psychotic disturbances, and anxiety. Resident #15 was severely cognitively impaired and had been on hospice services since 04/19/22 for cerebral atherosclerosis. Review of Resident #15's hospice care binder visit notes from 08/10/23 to 10/05/23 revealed no documentation from nursing, home health aide, social worker, or chaplain that the visited Resident #15 and there was no documentation of the visit notes with the care and services provided to Resident #15. Review of Resident #15's Hospice Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care from 08/12/23 to 10/10/23 revealed Resident #15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control techniques when they failed to cleanse their hands after changing gloves and failed to appropriately clean a wound for Resident #64. This affected one (Resident #64) of three residents reviewed for skin conditions The facility census was 76. Findings include: Record review of Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 12/14/22. Diagnoses included rectal fistula, quadriplegia, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage IV (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed). Review of Resident #64's physician order dated 10/04/23 revealed an order for treatment to the coccyx wound to cleanse the area with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply collagen to wound base, pack with Dakin's soaked gauze, and cover with foam dressing every shift and as needed. Observation on 10/04/23 at 11:25 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #282 gathered supplies including collagen, wound cleanser,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$34,976 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $19,383 — penalty dated 2024-06-20
• $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-10-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MICHAEL SLYK — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $482K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH