No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aventura At Carriage Inn

5040 Philadelphia Drive, Dayton, OH 45415 · For profit - Corporation · 85 certified beds · (937) 278-0404 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (937) 278-0404 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 46 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
5538 Philadelphia Dr · (937) 424-3589 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5045 N Main St · (937) 279-0468 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
27 Bennington Dr · (208) 972-6393 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Riverside Dr · (937) 274-6871 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.4%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.8%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms32.5%30.1%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.5%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.4%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.3%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.7%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.6%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.8%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.7%75.6%79.4%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.3–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.84
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.10
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
55.4%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 70.7 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-12)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2022-08-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident's medications were administered as ordered resulting in five medication errors out of 33 opportunities or a 15 percent (%) error rate. This affected two (#04 and #59) residents out of four reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 65.Findings included:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #04 revealed an admission date of 04/08/25 with medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), morbid obesity, congestive heart failure (CHF), constipation, and chronic kidney disease stage III.Review of Resident #04's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/23/26, revealed Resident #04 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene and transfers, required substantial/maximum staff assistance for bathing and bed mobility and was independent with eating. Review of Resident #04's physician orders revealed orders dated 04/12/26 for furosemide 40 milligram (mg) tablet one by mouth two times per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of facility investigation, and review of a clinical resource guidance, the facility failed to implement appropriate safety interventions to prevent an avoidable fall by not ensuring the resident was safely positioned in bed during incontinence care. This affected one (#70) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 65.Findings include:Medical record review for Resident #70 revealed diagnoses included dementia, high blood pressure, and kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 was cognitively impaired and required total dependence from one staff for care. Review of the progress notes dated 03/06/26 revealed Resident #70 was on the floor beside her bed in a fetal position. Both side rails were raised. Review of the facility investigation dated 03/06/26 revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #39 was providing incontinence care to Resident #70. CNA #70 rolled Resident #70 away from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility menu, observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was served per the facility menu. This affected nine (#28, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #40, #41, and #71) resident who did not receive coleslaw on their lunch trays. The facility census 62. Findings include: Review of the facility menu for the lunch meal for 12/10/25 revealed that residents would receive baked pork chop, baked beans, creamy coleslaw, cornbread, and whipped jello parfait. Observation of the lunch service on 12/10/25 at 1:04 P.M. revealed that the kitchen ran out of coleslaw and Resident #28, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #40, #41, and #71 did not receive coleslaw on their trays. Interview on 12/10/25 at 1:06 P.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #179 verified the facility ran out of coleslaw. DM #179 verified Resident #28, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #40, #41, and #71 did not receive coleslaw and were not given any substitutions. Review of the facility policy titled, Menu Substitutions date 04/25/24 revealed substitutions shall be made when menu items are not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify resident representative of a resident's change of condition. This affected one (#64) out of three reviewed for changes in conditions. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 06/10/25 with medical diagnoses of right femur fracture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, chronic kidney disease Stage IV, and pneumonitis. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #64 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/16/25, which indicated Resident #64 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, bathing, bed mobility and transfers. The MDS indicated Resident #64 required substantial/maximum staff assistance for eating. Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed a nurses' note, dated 06/16/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to properly assess a surgical wound to include measurements and description of the wound. This affected one (#64) out of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 06/10/25 with medical diagnoses of right femur fracture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, chronic kidney disease Stage IV, and pneumonitis. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #64 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/16/25, which indicated Resident #64 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, bathing, bed mobility and transfers. The MDS indicated Resident #64 required substantial/maximum staff assistance for eating and had a surgical wound. Review of the medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide wound care as ordered for an arterial ulcer to a resident's foot and failed to complete a comprehensive wound assessment for surgical wound on a resident's foot. This affected one (#66) out of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 12/01/24 with medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #66 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE], readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/08/25, which indicated Resident #66 was cognitively intact and required supervision with bed mobility, eating, and transfers and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. This affected two (Residents #10 and #11) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 65 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 06/28/24 with diagnoses including infection and inflammation of internal right hip prosthesis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver with ascites, and hypertension. Resident #10 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned on 04/05/25. Review of the hospital discharge orders for Resident #10 revealed an order dated 04/05/25 for Levaquin (an antibiotic) 750 milligrams (mg) once daily by mouth until 05/13/25. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #10 dated April 2025 revealed Levaquin was administered twice daily on 04/06/25, 04/07/25, 04/08/25, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-30 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory services were provided as ordered. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 65 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 06/28/24 with diagnoses including infection and inflammation of internal right hip prosthesis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver with ascites, and hypertension. Resident #10 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned on 04/05/25. Review of the hospital discharge orders for Resident #10 dated 04/05/25 revealed an order for Vancomycin (antibiotic) intravenous (IV) one gram every 12 hours and an order to obtain a Vancomycin level every Monday. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #10 revealed the resident was given the first dose of IV Vancomycin on 04/06/25 at 8:00 P.M. Review of the lab results for Resident #10 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment and furnishings in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility with the exception of three facility-identified residents who did not consume food by mouth. The facility census was 63 residents.Findings include:1.Observation on 10/20/25 at 9:24 A.M. revealed there were plastic containers on the clean dish rack which had been stacked while wet and were nesting. Interview on 10/20/25 at 9:25 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #21 verified that the containers were wet and were being stored nested together so they couldn't dry properly. 2.Observation on 10/20/25 at 9:28 A.M. revealed the knife storage rack above the prep table contained two knives each with several missing metal chips along the blades and three knives with residue on the blade. Interview on 10/20/25 at 9:28 A.M. with DM #21 verified that the two knives had missing metal chips along the blades and the three knives were unclean. 3. Observation on 10/20/25 at 9:29 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of the facility menu, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to prepare pureed foods in a method that conserved nutritive value, flavor and appearance. This affected four (Residents #7, #13, #21,and #35) of four residents with orders for pureed diets. The facility census was 63 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical records for Residents #7, #13, #21,and #35 revealed the residents had physician orders to receive a pureed diet. Review of the puree diet menu for 10/20/25 revealed the following items were on the lunch menu: beef burgundy, vegetable rice pilaf, green peas, mandarin oranges, dinner roll, chocolate chip cookie. Review of the substitution log revealed beef stew was substituted for beef burgundy on 10/20/25. Observation on 10/20/25 at 11:07 A.M. revealed [NAME] #14 prepared pureed peas. [NAME] #14 added 10 ounces (oz) of peas, one cup of water, and three scoops of thickener to a food processer and blended the peas. [NAME] #14 then prepared pureed beef stew by adding 12 oz. stew,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for residents on enhanced barrier precautions. This affected three (Residents #61, #21, #14) of three residents observed for care. The facility also failed to ensure staff practiced proper hand hygiene. This affected one (Resident #21) of three residents observed for care and one (Resident #15) of two residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 63 residents.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 09/23/25 with diagnoses including cerebral atherosclerosis, tracheostomy, and gastrostomy. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #61 revealed an order dated 09/24/25 for the resident to be on enhanced barrier precautions Observation on 10/21/25 at 8:27 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #30 was in Resident #61's room providing care without a gown. Interview on 10/21/25 at 8:29 P.M. with LPN #30 confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-21 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended in resident rooms. This affected one (Resident #15) of two residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 63 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 04/08/25 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, malignant prostate cancer, and pneumonia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #15 dated 07/15/25 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required moderate staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the physician's orders for Resident #15 dated October 2025 revealed there was no order for the resident to self-administer medications. Observation on 10/20/25 at 10:01 A.M. with License Practical Nurse (LPN) #30 revealed the nurse entered Resident #15's room with an ampule of albuterol, an inhalant medication to assist with breathing. LPN #30 placed the contents of the ampule into the nebulizer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff administered blood pressure medications according to physician-ordered parameters. This affected one (Resident #15) of two residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 63 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 04/08/25 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, malignant prostate cancer, and pneumonia.Review a physician's order for Resident #15 revealed an order dated 04/09/25 for Diltiazem 120 milligram (mg) once daily with parameters to hold the medication if the resident's systolic blood pressure was less than 110.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #15 dated 07/15/25 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required moderate staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.)Observation on 10/20/25 at 10:05 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #30 revealed the nurse withheld Resident #15's dose of Diltiazem…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the policy to check placement of the resident's gastrostomy tube (G-tube) before medication was administered. This affected one (#62) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 60. Findings included: Review of an admission medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #62 included: moderate protein-calorie malnutrition and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids) in the oral phase. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/11/24, revealed Resident #62 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #62 was dependent on staff for completion of all activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS also revealed Resident #62 received 51% or more of their total calories and fluid intake through their feeding tube. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent (%). There were 3 medication errors of 38 medication opportunities, which resulted in a medication error rate of 7.89%. This affected two (#62 and #111) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 60. Findings included: 1. Review of an admission medical record for Resident #111 revealed an admission date of 12/04/24. Diagnoses for Resident #111 included: hypertensive urgency, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, atherosclerotic heard disease, and essential hypertension. Observation on 12/10/24 beginning at 8:14 A.M., during medication administration, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 prepared one vitamin B12, 500 micrograms (mcg) and one enteric coated aspirin, 81 milligrams (mg). The medications were administered to Resident #111. Review of Resident #111's physician Order Summary Report for active orders as of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at the bedside. This affected one (#45) of three sampled residents reviewed for potential accidents. The facility census was 60. Findings included: Review of the admission medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 08/18/22. Diagnoses for Resident #45 included: neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (a neurological brain disorder with symptoms of Alzheimer's disease) and aphasia (the inability to verbally express ideas and thoughts). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/20/24, revealed Resident #45 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #45's care plan, revised 03/20/23, included a focus area indicating the resident had impaired decision-making ability and impaired memory. The care plan indicated Resident #45 would be assisted in decision making and care. Observation on 12/09/24 at 10:28 A.M., revealed on the top of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection control procedures when administering medications. This affected one (#111) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 60. Findings included: Observations on 12/10/24 at 8:14 A.M., during the medication administration, in the presence of Registered Nurse (RN) #2, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 removed the following medications from the medication package and place the medications in her bare hands: amlodipine (a high blood pressure medication), Plavix (a medication to help prevent blood clots), Lexapro (an antidepressant medication), Microzide (a blood pressure medication), and Lopressor (a blood pressure medication). Interview on 12/10/24 at 8:23 A.M., with LPN #1 stated she had not been taught anything about touching medication, but stated touching the medication with her hands could contaminate the medication. Interview on 12/10/24 at 8:24 A.M., with RN #2 stated she planned to speak with LPN #1 about touching medications with her hands and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was notified of development of new pressure ulcer and treatment plan. This affected one (#75) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed an admission date of 04/03/24 with medical diagnoses of cerebral atherosclerosis, protein calorie-malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/17/24, which indicated Resident #75 had severe cognitive impairment and required partial/moderate staff assistance with toilet hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. The MDS indicated Resident #75 required substantial/maximum staff assistance with bathing and no pressure ulcer/injuries were noted. Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed a wound observation evaluation, dated 07/25/24, which stated Resident #75…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control procedures. This affected one (#22) out of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 02/21/22 with medical diagnoses of heart failure, diabetes mellitus, severe protein calorie malnutrition, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/30/24, which indicated Resident #22 was cognitively intact and was independent with eating, bed mobility, and transfers, required supervision with bathing, and set-up assistance with toileting. The MDS did not indicate Resident #22 had any skin areas. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed a wound observation evaluation, dated 08/28/24, which stated Resident #22 had a Stage III pressure ulcer to her sacrum and treatment was in place. Review of the medical record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for a resident. This affected one (#76) of three residents reviewed who were new admissions. The census was 74. Findings include: Review of Resident #76's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 05/16/24. Diagnoses listed included osteoarthritis, restless leg syndrome, type two diabetes mellitus, and morbid obesity. Resident #76 was discharged from the facility on 05/19/24. Further review of Resident #76's closed medical record revealed no documentation of baseline careplan being developed. During an interview on 06/05/24 at 10:50 A.M. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed a baseline careplan had not been completed for Resident #76. This deficiency is based on incidental findings discovered during the course of this complaint investigation.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update a resident's comprehensive care plan for suicide risk/suicidal ideation. This affected one (#59) of three residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The census was 74. Findings include: Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an admission dated of 01/31/23. Diagnoses listed include hypertensive kidney disease, major depressive disorder, bradycardia, impulsiveness, dementia, and congestive heart failure. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #59 was severely cognitively impaired with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of four out of a possible 15. Review of progress notes revealed on 05/09/24 expressed thoughts of harming himself and having plan to do so by telling a state tested nursing assistant (STNA). Resident #59 was placed on one on one (1:1) supervision until a psychiatric evaluation on 05/10/24. On 05/20/24 Resident #59 was found with a call light wrapped around…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide urinary catheter care to a resident. This affected one (#76) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The census was 74. Findings include: Review of Resident #76's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 05/16/24. Diagnoses listed included osteoarthritis, restless leg syndrome, type two diabetes mellitus, and morbid obesity. Resident #76 was discharged from the facility on 05/19/24. Review of a Nursing Administration Evaluation dated 05/16/24 revealed Resident #76 had an indwelling urinary catheter. Further review of Resident #76's closed medical record revealed no documentation of urinary catheter care being provided to Resident #76 from admission [DATE] to discharge 05/19/24. During an interview on 06/05/24 at 9:55 A.M. The Director of Nursing (DON) and Regional Nurse #100 confirmed urinary catheter care was not documented as being provided Resident #76. Urinary catheter care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of medication information from Medscape, the facility failed to monitor a resident's blood glucose level before administering insulin. This affected one (#76) of three residents reviewed for insulin administration. The census was 74. Findings include: Review of Resident #76's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 05/16/24. Diagnoses listed included osteoarthritis, restless leg syndrome, type two diabetes mellitus, and morbid obesity. Resident #76 was discharged from the facility on 05/19/24. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 05/16/24 to inject 60 units of insulin glargine subcutaneous solution 100 units per milliliter (unit/ml) subcutaneously (SQ) at bedtime for diabetes mellitus. Review of medication administration records (MAR) revealed 60 units of insulin glargine subcutaneous solution was administered to Resident #76 on 05/17/24 and 05/18/24. No documentation of blood glucose levels checks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide a resident with timely incontinence care and timely assistance with the use of a bed pan. This affected one (#44) of three residents reviewed for incontinent care. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #44 revealed admission date of 02/18/24. Diagnoses include diabetes mellitus type two, morbid obesity and hypertension. The resident was scheduled to be discharged [DATE] to another facility. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44's Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 indicating intact cognition. Resident #44 required maximum assistance for bed mobility, dependent for transfers and maximum assistance for eating. Review of Resident #44's admission skin assessment dated [DATE] revealed bruising to the right forearm and healed pressure area to the sacrum. Review of Resident #44's Body assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and physician interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify a resident's physician of abnormal laboratory results. This affected one (#77) of three residents reviewed for notification of change. The census was 74. Findings include: Review of Resident #77's closed medical record revealed an admission dated of 07/29/23. Diagnoses listed included obstructive sleep apnea, muscle weakness, type two diabetes mellitus, urine retention, and chronic kidney disease. Resident #77 was transferred to a local hospital on [DATE]. Resident #77 passed away while at the hospital on [DATE]. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 was moderately cognitively impaired with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of eight. Resident #77 had an indwelling catheter. Review of progress notes revealed Resident #77 was noted with penile discharge with a foul odor on 12/19/23. Resident #77 was assessed by physician on 12/19/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and physician interviews, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) information, the facility failed to timely treat a resident's urinary tract infection (UTI). This affected one (#77) of three residents reviewed for UTI's. The census was 74. Findings include: Review of Resident #77's closed medical record revealed an admission dated of 07/29/23. Diagnoses listed included obstructive sleep apnea, muscle weakness, type two diabetes mellitus, urine retention, and chronic kidney disease. Resident #77 was transferred to a local hospital on [DATE]. Resident #77 passed away while at the hospital on [DATE]. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 was moderately cognitively impaired with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of eight. Resident #77 had an indwelling catheter. Review of progress notes revealed Resident #77 was noted with penile discharge with a foul odor on 12/19/23. Resident #77 was assessed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatments were completed as prescribed and failed to ensure pressure ulcer assessment were completed. This affected two (Residents #10 and #12) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 02/20/23. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease and cognitive communications deficit. The resident was cognitively impaired. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 required assistance with eating, toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of the 12/13/23 wound evaluation revealed a Suspected Deep Tissue Injury (SDTI) (purple or maroon localized area of discolored intact skin due damage of underlying soft tissue from pressure) on the left proximal foot measuring 1.5 centimeters (cm) by (x) 1.5 cm and left proximal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's policy, record review, observations, review of online resources for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff wore Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while caring for residents to the prevent the potential spread of COVID-19. In addition, the facility failed to have a Legionella management plan in place. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation on 08/02/22 at 1:26 P.M. revealed there were two staff members supervising five residents smoking. Residents were spaced approximately six feet apart. Activity Aide #168 was sitting at a table with two residents, within six feet with his mask pulled down to his chin. This was verified by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #125. Observation on 08/03/22 at 8:29 A.M. revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #163 went into Resident #63's room while he was present, with her mask pulled down to her chin and her goggle on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and recipe review, the facility failed to ensure therapeutic texture diets were made according to a recipe and maintained palatability. This had the potential to affect 13 residents who received a puréed diet. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Observation and interview on 08/02/22 at 11:08 A.M. with Dietary Staff (DS) #185 revealed DS #185 was preparing mixed vegetables of 14 servings. DS #185 stated the vegetables already had liquid in the can and she added chicken broth. DS #185 put in several unmeasured scoops of vegetables in the roboku and blended for several seconds. DS #185 then dumped an unmeasured amount of liquid from the container in the roboku (estimated around half to three-fourths cup). The vegetables and liquid were blended to a tomato soup consistency. DS #185 stated she needed to add thickener to the mixture. DS #185 added four unmeasured spoonfuls (about one tablespoon each) of thickener then blended the mixture. DS #185 stated the mixture was still too thin and Kitchen Manager (KM) #180 added a large scoop…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, review of manufacturer's guide, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was safely and properly stored in the kitchen. The facility also failed to ensure the dishwasher was in safe working order. This had the potential to a affect all residents except three (Residents #5, #39 and #54) who do not eat food from the kitchen. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Observations and interview on 08/01/22 from 9:05 A.M. to 9:20 A.M. with Kitchen Manager #180 revealed pancakes and bratwurst were left undated in the freezer. In addition, a box of green beans, chicken breast, and cut up sausage were left open to air and undated in the freezer. Many items in the freezer appeared to have freezer burn and were covered in frost. The refrigerator had an employee lunch that was left undated and four gallons of milk dated 07/27/22 and 07/28/22. The dry storage area included three bags of pasta, two bags of brownie mix, and three bags of yellow cake mix that was unsealed and undated. The dry storage also contained a pack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an updated and accurate pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) assessment was completed for the residents. This affected three (Residents (#39, #45, and #53) of six resident reviewed for the PASARR program. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 09/28/16. Diagnoses included respiratory failure with hypoxia, encephalopathy, psychosis, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was cognitively intact. Review of the PASARR assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 has no mental health diagnoses. Interview on 08/03/22 at 1:33 P.M. with Social Services (SS) #173 confirmed the PASARR assessment was not accurate for Resident #39 to reflect Resident #39 had a mental health diagnosis. SS #173 stated she would complete a new PASARR assessment for Resident #39. 2. Review of the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, review of the facility's policy, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #39 who required assistance with activity of daily living (ADL) care received adequate and timely nail care. This affected one (Resident #39) of two residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility identified 71 residents who required assistance with bathing. The facility census was 72. Findings include Review of the medical record for the Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 09/28/16. Diagnoses included respiratory failure with hypoxia, cerebrovascular disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, diabetes mellitus, psychosis, tremor, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of one staff for hygiene care and required extensive assistance of two staff for bathing. Review of the plan of care dated 06/22/22 revealed Resident #39 had impaired activity of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record reviews, review of the facility's policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's skin assessments were completed as physician ordered, failed to monitor a resident's wounds routinely, and failed to timely identify new wounds. This affected two (Residents #39 and #56) of two residents reviewed for skin. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 09/28/16. Diagnoses included respiratory failure with hypoxia, cerebrovascular disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, tremor, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of two staff members for transfers and bed mobility. Resident #39 had no wounds or skin conditions. Review of the plan of care dated 06/22/22 revealed Resident #39 was at risk for impaired skin integrity with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) resources, the facility failed to have documented timely treatment and interventions for a resident who was admitted to the facility with deep tissue injuries (DTIs). This affected one (Resident #23) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified four residents with pressure ulcers. The facility census was 72. Finding include: Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/22/22. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, hypertension, rhabdomyolysis, stage III pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed) of left ankle, and unstageable pressure ulcer (slough and/or eschar: known but not stageable due to coverage of wound bed by slough and/or eschar) of left hip. Review of Resident #23's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview and review of Medscape guidance, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from unnecessary medication use. This affected one (Resident #58) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #58 revealed an admission date of 12/27/19. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and stroke. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for toileting. Review of the physician's orders dated 07/08/22 revealed Resident #58 had an order for Miralax (laxative) 17 grams by mouth daily. Review of the bowel record for Resident #58 revealed loose/diarrhea was noted on 07/07/22, 07/09/22, 07/10/22, 07/11/22, 07/12/22, 07/13/22, 07/14/22, 07/15/22, 07/16/22, 07/19/22, 07/20/22, 07/21/22/ 07/23/22, 07/24/22, 07/25/22, 07/27/22, 07/29/22, 07/30/22, 07/31/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facilities legionella risk assessment and control plan and facility staff interview the facility failed to implement control measures to ensure the facility water source was free from legionella bacteria. This had the potential to affect all 63 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facilities legionella risk assessment and control plan revealed the facility would test the water for the presence of legionella bacteria when there was a risk presented to the facility's water source, to ensure the water was free of legionella bacterium. The facility had the water tested after recent tornado activity as the water was shut off for a week. The facility was under a boil advisory for the water after the water was turned back on by the municipal water supplier. The test the facility had conducted was for Escherichia coli (E.Coli) and for Coliform, both were negative. During an interview with the Administrator on 08/01/19 at 2:45 P.M. it was verified the facility called the local county health department and received guidance to test the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-01 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a copy of the notification of bed hold status, or transfer and discharge notice to the resident, their representative or the Ombudsman for residents that discharged to the hospital. This affected seven (#20, #21, #26, #44, #58, #106 and #256) of seven residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility identified 24 residents who had an unplanned discharge to the hospital in the past six months who additionally did not receive these notifications. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of the record for Resident #20 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include type 2 diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, hypokalemia, major depressive disorder, angina pectoris, Parkinson's disease, encephalopathy, disorder of calcium metabolism, hypercholesterolemia, constipation, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, retention of urine and schizoaffective disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-01 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a copy of the notification of bed hold status, or transfer and discharge notice to the resident, their representative or the Ombudsman for residents that discharged to the hospital. This affected seven (#20, #21, #26, #44, #58, #106 and #256) of seven residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility identified 24 residents who had an unplanned discharge to the hospital in the past six months who additionally did not receive these notifications. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of the record for Resident #20 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include type 2 diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, hypokalemia, major depressive disorder, angina pectoris, Parkinson's disease, encephalopathy, disorder of calcium metabolism, hypercholesterolemia, constipation, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, retention of urine and schizoaffective disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility staff interview and resident interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to complete a comprehensive care plan that addressed resident individual needs. This affected two (#5 and #47) of 19 residents care plans reviewed. The total facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included respiratory failure with hypoxia, cerebrovascular accident, hemiplegia, hyperkalemia, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, hyperlipdiemia, dysarthria, diabetes type two, anxiety, depression, alcohol abuse, obesity and deconditioning. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had cognitive impairment, had no hallucinations or delusions; however, did have rejection of care one to three days of the review period. The resident was coded as requiring extensive assist for bed mobility, dressing, eating, toileting and, dependent on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and facility staff interview the facility failed to update care plans timely. This affected one (#47) of 19 residents' care plans reviewed. The total facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included respiratory failure with hypoxia, cerebrovascular accident, hemiplegia, hyperkalemia, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, hyperlipdiemia, dysarthria, diabetes type two, anxiety, depression, alcohol abuse, obesity and deconditioning. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] the resident had cognitive impairment, had no hallucinations or delusions; however, did have rejection of care one to three days of the review period. The resident was coded as requiring extensive assist for bed mobility, dressing, eating, toileting and, dependent on staff for transfer. The resident is coded as having hypertension, hemiplegia, anxiety, and depression included as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to timely refer a resident for restorative nursing care. This affected one Resident (#5) of 24 reviewed. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included fracture of the left humerus, repeated falls, hearing loss and major depression. Review of the assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident required extensive assistance of staff for bed mobility, transfer, and all activities of daily living. Review of the notification of discharge from therapy dated 05/28/19 revealed she would be discharged from physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT), and referred to restorative. Review of the plan of care (POC) dated 05/28/19 revealed the restorative plan was not in place. Review of the quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had improved in only one area (eating), which was documented as supervision. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide timely weights, reweighs and acknowledge a significant weight loss. This affected one Resident (#5) of 24 reviewed. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included fracture of the left humerus, repeated falls, hearing loss and major depression. Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated April 2019 revealed weekly weights were ordered times four weeks. There were no weekly weights documented for Resident #5. Review of the admission dietary assessment dated [DATE] documented her current body weight (CBW) on 04/02/19 was 139.7 pounds, her usual body weight (UBW) was 136 pounds per resident. Resident #5 was alert and oriented and stated she had no recent weight changes, she had been on ensure at the former facility and was explained she would be placed on a similar product three times daily for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and facility staff interview the facility failed to the monitor the dialysis access site. This affected one Resident (#21) of one reviewed. The facility identified three residents who were receiving dialysis services. The total facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic ischemic heart disease, end stage renal disease, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had cognitive impairment, had no delusions or hallucinations, but did have rejection of care one to three days. The resident was coded as receiving dialysis services. Review of Resident #21's care plans revealed the resident had a care plan in place that identified the dialysis center where dialysis occurred, the address and contact information. The care plan also indicated the staff were to check the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and facility staff interview the facility failed to have required medications available. This affected one (#20) of four observed during medication administration. The total facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type two diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, hypokalemia, major depressive disorder, angina pectoris, Parkinson's disease, encephalopathy, disorder of calcium metabolism, hypercholesterolemia, constipation, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, retention of urine and schizoaffective disorder Bi Polar type. Review of the progress notes dated 07/30/19 revealed the notes were silent to the resident being administered the medication, the medication being signed as given in error, or the physician or family being notified of the missing dose of medication. During observation on 07/30/19 at 8:35 A.M., Licensed Practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility staff interview and review of package insert the facility failed to store ophthalmic solution correctly in one of two medication carts observed. The facility had a total of four medication carts. This directly affected two (#26 and #41) residents who medications were stored in the 400 hall medication cart. The total facility census was 63. Findings include: Observation on 07/31/19 at 9:35 A.M. of the 400 hall medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 482 revealed there was Latanopros ophthalmic solution 0.005% for Resident #26 with an opened date of 05/25/19 and the attached sticker indicated to discard 42 days after opening. The 42nd day would have been 7/06/19. At the time of the observation LPN #482 confirmed the resident was still receiving the eye drops and that was the only bottle available. Additionally there was Olopathadine 0.1% ophthalmologist solution for Resident #41 without an open date on the medication. The bag the medication was stored in had a deliver date from the pharmacy of 04/25/19. LPN #482 confirmed the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-08-10 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have the nurse staffing information posted with the current date, in a prominent location where it could be easily seen by residents and visitors, and have logs maintained of all daily staff postings for the previous 18 months. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 08/03/22 at 12:40 P.M. revealed the nurse aide staffing form was unable to be located without staff assistance. The Director of Nursing (DON) provided assistance in locating the form which was found in a glass enclosed bulletin board down a staffing hallway. This hallway had three doors which were the staff lounge with a sign saying staff area only, a door labeled the mechanical closet, and a door to outside which was near the back parking lot where deliveries were brought in, where outdoor mechanicals were located and where the dumpster were. The staffing sheet posted stated the date was 02/23/18. Interview on 08/03/22 at 12:45 P.M. with the DON confirmed the date on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVENTURA HEALTH GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 51.5+1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
KASZIRER, MOISHEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL50%since 12/01/2021
SCHARF, MORDECHAIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER50%since 12/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$934K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 22%Medicare 2%Other / private 76%

This home reported $934K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$302per resident / day
operating cost
$9,176per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$272per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365876. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next