Aventura At Shiloh Springs
3500 Shiloh Springs Road, Trotwood, OH 45426 · For profit - Corporation · 84 certified beds · (937) 854-1180 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.5% | 5.3% | 15.4% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 18.4% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.3% | 6.1% | 16.1% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.3% | 25.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.3% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.8% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.4% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 30.2% | 8.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 51.7% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 16.8% | 24.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.1% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 58.7 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.555 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
65 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility's smoking policy, the facility failed to adequately assess and supervise residents identified as being supervised smokers to prevent them from smoking while oxygen was in place. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm and/or injuries on 04/14/26 when Resident #43 lit a cigarette while wearing oxygen via nasal cannula and sustained burns to his face. On 05/31/25, Resident #43 again lit a cigarette while wearing oxygen and sustained additional burns to his face. This affected one (Resident #43) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility identified 28 residents (#04, #06, #08, #11, #12, #16, #22, #24, #26, #27, #28, #31, #32, #33, #36, #40, #41, #42, #43, #50, #53, #54, #57, #58, #59, #60, and #61) who smoked. The facility census was 61.On 06/10/26 at 12:58 P.M., the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Regional Director of Clinical Operations (RDCO) #105, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, review of the facility policy, and review of the guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to thoroughly assess the resident's skin and failed to timely identify the resident's pressure ulcers until they reached an advanced stage. This resulted in Actual Harm to Residents #32, #39, and #42 who developed pressure ulcers while in the facility which were not identified until they had reached an advanced stage. Resident #42 was not assessed for the risk of pressure ulcer until after the resident developed four pressure ulcers (a stage III pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed) to the right thigh, a stage III pressure ulcer to the superior coccyx, an unstageable pressure ulcer (slough and/or eschar: known but not stageable due to coverage of wound bed by slough and/or eschar) to the inferior coccyx, and a stage III pressure ulcer to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of online resources from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices were implemented. This affected four Residents (#47, #46, #16, and #38) of four residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record of Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 01/16/26. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis of vertebra, paraplegia, carrier of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumanni (CRAB) (highly resistant bacteria that cause deadly multidrug resistant infections in hospitalized patients in hospitals and nursing homes) and open wound to right lower leg. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/06/26, revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was dependent for bed mobility and transfers. Review of the physician orders for Resident #47 dated 06/10/26,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure falls were documented and investigated in a thorough manner. This affected one (#21) of three residents reviewed for safety. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 02/11/26. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, congestive heart failure, GERD, bipolar disorder.Review of the Morse Fall Scale dated 02/11/26, revealed Resident #21 was at a moderate risk for falls. Review of the plan of care dated 02/16/26, revealed Resident #21 was at risk for falls related to requiring assistance with ambulation and transfers. Interventions included assisting the resident with wheelchair or walker for mobility as needed. Review of the physician order for Resident #21 dated 05/29/26, revealed the resident was ordered to receive one-on-one (1:1) supervision until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review , staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when a resident experienced a change in condition. This affected one resident (#43) of three reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 61.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 05/19/25. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus (DM II), emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and chronic respiratory failure.Review of the physician order dated 09/24/25, revealed Resident #43 was ordered oxygen at two liters per minute (lpm) per nasal cannula as needed to maintain pulse oxygen saturation above 92 percent (%).Review of the most recent Smoking Safety Screening dated 02/26/26, revealed Resident #43 was not recorded as a current smoker.Review of Resident #43's care plan dated 03/20/26, revealed Resident #43 was at risk for injury related to smoking. The resident required supervision when smoking and utilized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician progress notes were written, signed and dated at the time of the visit. This affected three Residents (#33, #50, and #62) of three residents reviewed for physician visits. The facility census was 61. Findings include:1) Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 10/17/24. Diagnoses included Chronic obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), bipolar disorder, depression, and type II diabetes mellitus (DM II).Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #33 had intact cognition as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Review of the physician notes for Resident #33 authored by Medical Director (MD) #100, revealed she was seen on 04/01/26 and the progress note was written and signed by MD #100 on 04/19/26. The resident was seen again on 05/01/26 and the progress note was written and signed by MD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident's records were complete and accurately documented. This affected one (#43) of three residents reviewed for documentation. The facility census was 61.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 05/19/25. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus (DM II), emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and chronic respiratory failure.Review of the nurse's progress notes for Resident #43 from 04/14/26 through 05/31/26, revealed no documentation related to the incidents 04/14/26 and 05/31/26 when the resident was burned when he was smoking with oxygen on. Review of the physician progress note dated 04/15/26 at 3:00 A.M. and authored by Medical Director (MD) #100, revealed Resident #43 was seen for skin burn.Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 had intact cognition as evidenced by a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff provided the necessary level of supervision for safe smoking and residents smoked in the designated smoking areas. This affected two (Residents #29 and #41) of three residents reviewed for smoking safety. The facility census was 57. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #29 had an admissions date of 03/20/26. Diagnoses including displaced fracture of fifth cervical vertebra, hallucinations, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, and muscle weakness.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was cognitively intact. The smoking assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was a smoker and did not require supervision when smoking. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #29 was at risk for side effects/injury from smoking. Interventions included Resident #29 will smoke in designated areas. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, Long-Term Care Ombudsman interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain the residents' floors and medical equipment in a clean manner. This affected two residents (Residents #38 and #40). The facility census was 57. Findings include:Observation and interview on 05/19/26 at 10:28 A.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #79 was performing care for Resident #40 in her room. Resident #40's floor was wet and had just been mopped. The floor had specks of unknown black dirt laying on wet cream floor. Under Resident #40's bed, there was heavy dirt, which included hair, and a speck of unknown dirt against wall and floor. There were large spots of enteral feed spilled on the floor and tube feed pole. In the center of Resident #40's floor, there were four tan stains measuring around four to five inches in irregular circular size, like the color of the enteral feed. CNA #79 said enteral feed gets spilled and gets stuck on the floor. CNA #79 verified Resident #40's floor had some dirt and areas on floor were unclean.Observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, physician interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were transcribed accurately. This affected one (Resident #08) of four residents reviewed for physician orders. The facility census was 60.Findings include:Review of the medical record of Resident #08 revealed an admission date of 11/20/25. Diagnoses included syncope and collapse, asthma, diabetes, cocaine abuse in remission, drug-induced subacute dyskinesia, bradycardia, anxiety, depression, and post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #08 had intact cognition. The resident was assessed as exhibiting verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others and rejection of care one to three days during the assessment period. The resident was independent with bed mobility, required setup/cleanup assistance with eating, supervision with transfers, and partial/moderate assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-08 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to submit the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing information to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as required. This had the potential to affect all 55 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report [NAME] Report 1705D FY Quarter 3 2025 (April 1 - June 30) dated 12/26/25 revealed the facility failed to submit staffing data for the quarter. Interview with Corporate Human Resources (CHR #300) on 01/08/26 at 2:25 P.M. verified corporate received an alert notifying them of late submission for one of the quarters of fiscal year 2025.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were accurate to reflect the residents needs. This affected three (#2, #3, and #65) of 21 residents reviewed in the sample. The census is 55. Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed and admission dated of 12/04/25. Diagnoses listed included bacteremia, hypertension, cellulitis, type two diabetes mellitus, and osteomyelitis. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was cognitively intact. Further review of Resident #2's medical record revealed he was admitted with a urinary catheter (Foley) on 12/04/25 and the Foley remained in place until 01/06/26. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #2 had been ordered the narcotic pain medication oxycodone since admission [DATE]. Review of Resident #2 care plan dated initiated 12/204/25 revealed no focus, goals, or interventions related to a Foley or narcotic medication use.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 53 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, review of information from Medscape and review of information from the National Library of Medicine, the facility failed to ensure bowel movements were monitored for residents at risk of constipation. This affected one (#2) out of two residents reviewed for constipation. The census was 55. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed and admission dated of 12/04/25. Diagnoses listed included bacteremia, hypertension, cellulitis, type two diabetes mellitus, and osteomyelitis. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was cognitively intact. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 12/11/25 for oxycodone hydrochloride (narcotic pain medication) oral tablet 5 milligrams (mg) by mouth four times a day for pain. Further review of Resident #2's medical record revealed no documentation of bowel movements being monitored. There was not any documentation of Resident #2's last bowel movement.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's indwelling urinary catheter (Foley) was attempted to be removed as ordered. This affected one (#2) of one reviewed for Foley catheter care. The census was 55. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed and admission dated of 12/04/25. Diagnoses listed included bacteremia, hypertension, cellulitis, type two diabetes mellitus, and osteomyelitis. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was cognitively intact. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 12/30/25 to clamp Foley times four hours then release times 15 minutes, repeat times 24 hours then discontinue Foley. If no voiding may straight catheter every four to six hours and as needed. If post void residual is greater than 500 milliliters times two times replace foley. Further review Resident #2's medical record revealed no documentation of Resident #2's Foley being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff cared for a resident's tracheostomy appropriately. This affected one (#10) of one residents reviewed for tracheostomy care. The census was 55. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/21/25. Diagnoses listed included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, anxiety disorder, hemiplegia, encephalopathy, and psychotic disturbance. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was rarely understood by staff and received tracheostomy (trach) care. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident had a trach which was being cared for by nursing staff. Resident #10's tracheostomy care being completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #201 was observed on 01/07/25 at 2:05 P.M. LPN #201 removed gloves used during feeding tube care. LPN #201 did not sanitize or wash hands…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, interview with dialysis staff, review of dialysis treatment logs, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pre and post dialysis evaluations were completed, failed to ensure communication with dialysis center was consistently done, failed to ensure the medical record contained documentation related to missed dialysis treatments, and failed to ensure the physician was notified of missed dialysis treatments. This affected the one (#03) of one residents reviewed for dialysis services. The facility census was 55. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #03 revealed an admission date of 09/17/25 with medical diagnoses of intracranial hemorrhage, left hemiparesis, end stage renal disease (ESRD), and dependence on dialysis. Review of the medical record for Resident #03 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/18/25, which indicated Resident #03 was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate staff assistance with toilet hygiene and showers, and supervision with transfers. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at a resident's bedside. This affected one (#50) out of 55 residents observed during the initial pool. The census was 55. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/18/25. Diagnoses listed include atrial fibrillation, heart failure, hypertension, malnutrition, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of a quarterly Minimum data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 was cognitively intact. Further review of Resident #50's medical record revealed the nursing staff were to administer the residents medication and there was no assessment, order or care plan for the resident to self-administer medications. Observation on 01/05/26 at 11:22 A.M. revealed several pills in a medication cup and a bottle of Flonase (nasal spray) on a bedside table in Resident #50's room. Interview and observation with Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory (labs) values were obtained as per physician orders. This affected three (#02, #03, and #09) residents out of five residents reviewed for lab services. The facility census was 55. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #03 revealed an admission date of 09/17/25 with medical diagnoses of intracranial hemorrhage, left hemiparesis, end stage renal disease (ESRD), and dependence on dialysis. Review of the medical record for Resident #03 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/18/25, which indicated Resident #03 was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate staff assistance with toilet hygiene and showers, and supervision with transfers. The MDS indicated Resident #03 was independent with bed mobility and Resident #03 received dialysis. Review of the medical record for Resident #03 revealed a physician order dated 09/29/25 for complete blood count (CBC)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented enhance barrier precautions (EBP). This affected one (#10) of five reviewed for transmission-based precautions (TBP). The census was 55. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/21/25. Diagnoses listed included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, anxiety disorder, hemiplegia, encephalopathy, and psychotic disturbance. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was rarely understood by staff and received tracheostomy care. Review of physician orders revealed an order date 09/24/25 for EBP due to the presence of a tracheostomy and feeding tube. Observation of Resident #10's trach care and medication administration per feeding tube on 01/07/2026 2:05 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #201 did not don a gown when providing care. LPN #201 accessed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were supervised while smoking and further failed to ensure residents smoked in designated areas per facility policy. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents utilized non-combustible containers to extinguish smoking materials. This affected two (#21 and #07) of two residents reviewed for smoking. The facility identified 15 (#07, #08, #13, #15, #16, #20, #21, #24, #26, #32, #34, #43, #48, #49, and #50) residents who smoked. The facility census was 50.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 02/13/24 with medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and tobacco use.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/11/25, revealed Resident #21 was cognitively intact and was independent with all activities of daily living (ADLs).Review of the current plan of care revealed Resident #21 was at risk for injury related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide notification to the physician or family for a newly identified pressure ulcer. This affected one (#10) of three reviewed for pressure ulcers. care. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission date of 01/30/25. The resident was hospitalized [DATE] and did not return. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including bilateral osteoarthritis, type two diabetes mellitus and hypertension. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition. She required was independent for eating, moderate assistance for bed mobility, toileting hygiene and transfers were not attempted. Documentation revealed no pressure ulcers upon admission to the facility. Record review of the 02/06/25 skin assessment documented a nine centimeter (cm) by (x) 11.0 centimeter unstageable sacral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with personal hygiene and Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission date of 01/30/25. The resident was hospitalized [DATE] and did not return. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including bilateral osteoarthritis, type two diabetes mellitus and hypertension. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition. She required was independent for eating, moderate assistance for bed mobility, toileting hygiene and transfers were not attempted. She required moderate assistance with showering and bathing. A care plan revealed alterations in bladder elimination related to incontinence with interventions to assist with toileting needs and incontinence care on routine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews with staff and Wound Physician and policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to pressure ulcers. This affected two (#10 and #11) of three reviewed for pressure wounds. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission date of 01/30/25. The resident was hospitalized [DATE] and did not return. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including bilateral osteoarthritis, type two diabetes mellitus and hypertension. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition. She required was independent for eating, moderate assistance for bed mobility, toileting hygiene and transfers were not attempted. Documentation revealed no pressure ulcers upon admission to the facility. Record review of the 02/06/25 skin assessment documented a nine centimeter (cm) by (x) 11.0 centimeter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a hospital referral and interviews with staff, the facility failed to provide timely therapy services. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for therapy services. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission date of 01/30/25. The resident was hospitalized [DATE] and did not return. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including bilateral osteoarthritis, type two diabetes mellitus and hypertension. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition. She required was independent for eating, moderate assistance for bed mobility, toileting hygiene and transfers were not attempted. She required moderate assistance with showering and bathing. Review of the hospital referral for Resident #10 revealed orders for both Physical Therapy (PT) and Occupational Therapy (OT) services to continue at discharge.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures were followed during resident care. This affected one (#12) out of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #12 revealed admission date of 10/21/23 and admitted to hospice on 09/01/24. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including hemiplegia, diabetes mellitus, depression and gastronomy tube (g-tube). The resident remained in the facility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 had significant impaired cognition. He was dependent for eating, bed mobility, transfers and toileting hygiene. He was documented as always incontinent of urine and bowel. Further review of Resident #12's medical record revealed the resident had a wound on the buttock that required treatments. Observation on 03/11/25 at 10:38 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #13 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain and clean and sanitary environment. This affected two (#13 and #34) of six resident's rooms observed for environmental cleanliness. The facility census was 59. Findings Included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date 12/15/24. Diagnoses included chronic diastolic heart failure, cognitive communication deficit, atrial flutter, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 was assessed with severely impaired cognition. Observation on 01/22/25 at 11:01 A.M. of Resident #34's room revealed the floor to the left side of the bed had 25 circular brownish-black marks approximately two to three inches in diameter scattered on the floor. The floor was also noted to be dirty and stained, and the wall edges in the room were covered with black, hard dirt from approximately two to three inches from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide timely care and services when answering call lights. This affected one (#29) of three residents reviewed for call light response. The facility census was 59. Findings Included: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 11/11/24. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, type two diabetes, morbid obesity, anxiety, and major depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was assessed with intact cognition, required partial to moderate assistance with bathing, toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, dressing the lower body, placing shoes on and off the feet, and required a walker to ambulate. Review of a plan of care dated 12/31/24 revealed Resident #29 was at risk for impaired activities of daily living (ADLs) related to requiring assistance to perform and complete ADLs, weakness, asthma, diabetes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide timely pain medication as ordered to effectively treat pain. This affected one (#3) of three residents reviewed for pain management. This facility census was 59. Findings Included: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed a most recent admission date of 01/10/25. Diagnoses included cellulitis of the right lower limb, acute kidney failure, major depressive disorder, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was assessed with moderately impaired cognition. Review of a physician order dated 01/10/25 revealed Resident #3 had an order for the narcotic pain medication oxycodone immediate release (IR) five (5) milligrams (mg) to take one tablet by mouth every eight hours as needed for pain. Review of Resident #3's plan of care dated 01/11/25 revealed the resident received pain medication, received therapy, and had neuropathy.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure blood glucose levels were adequately monitored as ordered to determine the need for sliding scale insulin. This affected one (#13) of three residents reviewed for insulin usage. The facility census was 59. Findings Included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 had an admission date 11/06/24. Diagnoses included type two diabetes, alcohol dependence, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, acute kidney failure, and hypertension. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was assessed as cognitively intact. Review of a plan of care dated 11/06/24 revealed Resident #13 had the potential for hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia related to diabetes. Interventions included to obtain blood glucose checks per physician order and as needed, administer medication as ordered, educate resident regarding signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure medication administration records were accurately documented to reflect blood glucose monitoring. This affected one (#13) of three residents reviewed for insulin usage. The facility census was 59. Findings Included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 had an admission date 11/06/24. Diagnoses included type two diabetes, alcohol dependence, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, acute kidney failure, and hypertension. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was assessed as cognitively intact. Review of a plan of care dated 11/06/24 revealed Resident #13 had the potential for hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia related to diabetes. Interventions included to obtain blood glucose checks per physician order and as needed, administer medication as ordered, educate resident regarding signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the administration of as needed medication was documented in the resident's medical record. Additionally, the facility failed to document care and services related to incontinent care and application of durable medical equipment as ordered. This affected three (#15, #45 and #18) of three residents reviewed for medical record accuracy. The facility census was 42. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #45 revealed an admission on [DATE] and a discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. Diagnoses include congestive obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, sleep apnea, atrial fibrillation, anxiety disorder, obesity, and fracture of right fibula. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #45 revealed an intact cognition. Resident #45 required moderate assistance with eating, dependent for toileting, max assistance for bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, review of the facility's self-reported incident (SRI) and investigation, and policy review, the facility failed to prevent resident-to-resident physical abuse when a resident struck another resident with a cane, and a third resident came up behind the resident and struck the same resident. This affected one (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of the facility's SRI dated 07/09/24 revealed Resident #19 reported an allegation of physical abuse by two other residents to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #287. Resident #19 reported that Resident #41 struck him across the face while outside in the courtyard and Resident #52 used his hand to hit the back of his head. No injuries noted at time of incident. Review of the investigative notes dated 07/09/24 revealed Resident #41 and #52 denied the allegations. On 07/10/24, Resident #52 confirmed he came up behind Resident #19, swung, hitting him in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to prevent elopement. This affected one (Resident #24) of three reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 02/01/24. Diagnoses included Wernicke's encephalopathy and altered mental status. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 was cognitively impaired and required maximal assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the Wander Risk Evaluation dated 02/02/24 revealed Resident #24 was at a risk for wandering. The form did not indicate any interventions to be care planned. Review of the admission Nursing Evaluation dated 02/02/24 revealed Resident #24 was alert, confused, and oriented to name only. The form indicated Resident #24 experienced hallucinations, delusions, and resists care. Review of the care plan revealed an entry dated 03/20/24 indicating Resident #24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered timely. This affected one resident (#12) of four observed for medication administration. The facility census was 48. Findings include. Observation on 07/02/24 at 10:39 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #191 administering medications to Resident #12. The medications included one docusate 100 milligrams (mg), one Eliquis 2.5 mg tablet, one multivitamin tablet, one gabapentin 300 mg tablet, one Keppra 500 mg tablet, one spironolactone 25 mg tablet, one nicotine patch 7 mg, one puff of Advair 21 microgram, , and one vitamin D3. The gabapentin was ordered to be given three times daily and scheduled for 9:00 A.M., 1:00 P.M., and 5:00 P.M. Interview on 07/02/24 at 10:45 A.M. with LPN #151 revealed the medications were administered late and the gabapentin would have to be delayed for the next two administrations. Review of the policy tilted, Administering Medications, dated 08/2023 revealed medications are to be administered in a safe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of staffing schedules and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide eight hours of continuous Registered Nurse (RN) care seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 47 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the facility staffing schedules for dates 11/21/23 through 11/27/23 revealed there was no Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on 11/25/23 or 11/26/23. On 11/29/23 at 2:57 P.M. an interview with the Administrator confirmed the facility did not have RN coverage on 11/25/23 or 11/26/23. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00147602.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, review of dishwasher logs and manufacturers instructions, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher temperatures and sanitation was being followed as per manufacturer instructions. This had the potential to affect 44 out of 45 residents residing in the facility, two (#39 and #46) residents did not receive their meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Observation with Dietary Manager #1 on 11/28/23 at 10:22 A.M. in the facility kitchen of the dishwasher revealed the wash cycle temperature was 86 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the rinse cycle was 98 degrees F. Several cycles were performed with the wash cycle increasing to 100 degrees F and the rinse cycle to 110 degrees F. On 11/28/23 at 10:22 A.M. Dietary Manager #1 confirmed the dishwasher was not reaching the appropriate temperature. Record review of the dishwasher log revealed for breakfast the wash cycle was 110 degrees F on 11/20/23, 11/22/23 11/26/23; rinse cycle for breakfast was 110 degrees F on 11/20/23; and 115 degrees F on 11/24/23, 11/25/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an admission assessment on a newly admitted residents. This affected one (#33) of three residents reviewed who were newly admitted . The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #33 revealed admission date of 10/10/23. Medical diagnoses included but were not limited to personal history of bladder cancer, lung cancer, conjunctival edema right eye, ocular pain right eye and diabetes mellitus type II. The resident remains in the facility. Review of Resident #33's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating impaired cognition. He required set up for meals, substantial assistance for toileting, supervision for bed mobility and no documentation for transfers. Record review of the electronic medical record for Resident #33 revealed the MDS entry date was documented as 10/10/23. The census documented the actual admission date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This affected two (#57 and #33) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #57 revealed admission date of 7/23/23. Medical diagnoses included but were not limited to end stage renal disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The resident was discharged on 09/29/23. Review of Resident #57's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. She required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, toileting and supervision for eating. Review of Resident #57's September 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed no documentation Carvedilol (hypertension) 25 milligrams (mg) was given at 9:00 P.M. on 09/05/23; Gabapentin (neuropathy)100 mg (pain), Simethicone (gas) 80 mg, Calcium Acetate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and review of manufacturer instructions, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as physician orders resulting in three medication errors out of 32 opportunities or a 9.37 percent (%) medication error rate. This affected two (#32, #56) of three residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #32 revealed admission date of 06/07/22. Medical diagnoses included but were not limited to diabetes mellitus, hypertension and peripheral vascular disease. The resident remains at the facility. Observation on 11/29/23 at 7:42 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse #6 during medication administration for Resident #32 revealed an order for Lisinopril (hypertension) five milligrams (mg). LPN #6 stated the Lisinopril medication was not available. Review revealed the medication was last ordered on 10/21/23. A second observation revealed during the administration of 25 units of Levemir (Long acting insulin), LPN #6 took the cap off of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interviews and review of manufacturer instructions, the facility failed to ensure a residents insulin pen was primed according to manufacturer guidelines resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (#32) of three residents observed for medication administration. Facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #32 revealed admission date of 06/07/22. Medical diagnoses included but were not limited to diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease. The resident remains at the facility. Review of Resident #32' quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. He was independent for eating, toileting, transfers and bed mobility. He received seven injections of insulin during the seven day look back period. Observation on 11/29/23 at 7:42 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6 for Resident #32 revealed during the administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of hospital medical records, observations, staff interview, review of manufactures instruction policy review and review of guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures were followed. This affected two residents (#33 and #34) of three residents reviewed for infection control. Facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #34 revealed admission date of 6/1/22. Medical diagnoses included but were not limited to encephalopathy, paranoid schizophrenia and diabetes mellitus type II. The resident remains in the facility. Observation on 11/29/23 at 8:49 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #11 of medication administration for Resident #34 revealed he was to receive two units of Novolog insulin. LPN #11 removed the Novolog vial from its box and withdrew two units of insulin without cleaning the hub with alcohol. LPN #11 then went to Resident #34's room with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident's oxygen tubing was clean and changed regularly and failed to ensure Resident #16 had a physician's order for the administration of oxygen. This affected two (Residents #16 and #41) of three residents reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility census was 41 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 09/01/22 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), epilepsy, and chronic respiratory failure (CRF). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was cognitively impaired and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the physician orders for Resident #41 dated 01/25/23 revealed an order to change oxygen tubing once weekly. The was also an order dated 11/30/22 to administer oxygen continuously at two liters per minute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored and not left at bedside. Additionally, the facility failed to lock treatment carts. This affected one (#09) of three residents reviewed for medication storage and had the potential to affect four (#15, #27, #1 and #14) residents identified by the facility as cognitively impaired and independently mobile. Facility census was 41. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #09 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, stroke, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, seizures, adult failure to thrive, chronic respiratory failure, malnutrition, diabetes type two and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #09 revealed impaired cognition. Resident #09 requires extensive assistance from one staff member for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, policy reviews and review of the Center of Disease Control guidance, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control practices by ensuring staff properly sanitized/disinfected a blood glucose device (glucometer) after use for a resident and by ensuring staff did not did not contaminate medications during the medication preparation process. This affected one (#09) of three residents sampled for infection control practices and had the potential to affect three (#10, #01 and #02) additional residents identified by the facility with orders to monitor blood glucose levels using the same multi-user glucometer. Additionally, the facility failed to use a protective barrier between bed linen and clean wound supplies for wound dressing change. This affected one (#13) of three residents sampled for wound care. Facility census was 41. Finding include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #09 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications including ensuring that expired medications were not being used. This affected two of the four medication carts and one of one medication storage room located in the facility. This had the potential to affect eighteen residents due to expired medications and one other resident (#30) related to medication storage. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Observations and interview on 12/06/22 from 11:30 A.M. to 12:00 P.M. of two facility medication carts and one medication storage room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #772 revealed outdated medications. The outdated medications found were Calcium 500 milligrams (mg) dated 11/22/22, Aspirin 325 mg 07/22/22, Claritin 10 mg dated 09/22/22, Naproxen 220 mg 11/22/22, and Magnesium 500 mg 08/22/22. LPN #772 confirmed the outdated medications including Calcium, Aspirin, Claritin, Naproxen, and Magnesium. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (Resident #31) of one resident reviewed for abuse during the annual survey. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 02/06/19. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/08/22, revealed Resident #31 had intact cognition. Resident #31 did not exhibit hallucinations, delusions, or rejection of care during the assessment reference dates. Review of the plan of care for Resident #31 revealed no documentation of any behaviors related to dishonesty or making up false information. Review of the progress notes dated 01/03/22 at 2:20 P.M. revealed Resident #31 continued to state people were taking his money. Resident #31 was advised by staff to secure his money in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of misappropriation. This affected one (Resident #31) of one resident reviewed for abuse during the annual survey. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 02/06/19. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/08/22, revealed Resident #31 had intact cognition. Resident #31 did not exhibit hallucinations, delusions, or rejection of care during the assessment reference dates. Review of the plan of care for Resident #31 revealed no documentation of any behaviors related to dishonesty or making up false information. Review of the progress notes dated 01/03/22 at 2:20 P.M. revealed Resident #31 continued to state people were taking his money. Resident #31 was advised by staff to secure his money in a lock box or in the resident trust account. Resident #31 refused this suggestion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment of the resident's cognition and behavior on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This affected three (#37, #38, and #47) of 22 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 04/07/15. Diagnoses included end-stage renal disease. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #37 dated 11/11/22 revealed no documentation regarding the cognition of the resident. No brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score was completed for the resident. No mood or behaviors were assessed for the resident. Interview on 12/08/22 at 12:41 P.M. with MDS Nurse #298 confirmed the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #37 was not complete. MDS Nurse #298 added that the facility did not have consistent social services coverage at that time, and they were the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have a discharge summary or recapitulation of stay for a resident. This affected one (Resident #307) of four residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of Resident #307's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 09/24/22. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure, morbid obesity, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #307 had intact cognition. The discharge MDS assessment revealed Resident #307 was discharged to home on [DATE]. Further review Resident #307's closed medical record revealed no documented discharge summary or recapitulation of her stay. It was unclear what Resident #307's disposition was at discharge. Review of the progress notes revealed there was no documentation of Resident #307's discharge status. The last documentation was a nurse practitioner note dated 10/20/22 at 1:00 P.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to complete urinary catheter care as physician ordered for a resident. This affected one (Resident #25) one resident reviewed for a urinary catheter. The facility identified two residents with urinary catheters. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/04/22. Diagnoses included urinary retention and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), and had an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the physician order dated 06/21/22, revealed an order to flush (irrigate) suprapubic catheter with 30 milliliters (ml) of normal saline (NS) every six hours and as needed (PRN). Review of the treatment administration records for December 2022 revealed flushing of Resident #25's suprapubic catheter was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely re-assess and address the resident's significant weight gain or weight loss. This affected two residents (#37 and #47) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 04/07/15. Diagnoses included end-stage renal disease, dependence on dialysis, hypertension, and hypokalemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 had an intact cognition and had no hallucinations, delusions, or rejection of care was noted. Resident #37 required supervision from staff for eating. No swallowing concerns or therapeutic diets were noted on the assessment. Review of the plan of care dated 11/12/22 revealed Resident #37 had a history of significant weight changes. Interventions included obtaining and monitoring weights, providing diet and fluids as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record was accurate. This affected one (Resident #20) of 22 residents reviewed for accuracy of the medical records. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #20 revealed an admission date 03/25/22. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of the plan of care dated 03/25/22 revealed Resident #20 was at risk for drug related complications: related to psychotropic medication use antipsychotic. Interventions included to observe for drug related side effects (drowsiness, sedation, dizziness, lethargy, headache, insomnia, increased confusion, vertigo, dry mouth, tachycardia, blurred vision, seizures, abnormal tongue movement, abnormal jerking/twitching/writhing, tremors). Review of the physician orders dated 12/01/22 revealed an order to complete an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment every three months while Resident #20 was on an antipsychotic. Review of the Treatment Administration Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide or offer the COVID-19 vaccines to residents. This affected two (#2 and #48) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/04/22. Diagnoses included morbid obesity and history of pulmonary embolism. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #2's immunization list revealed one dose of a two dose COVID-19 vaccine was listed as being administered prior to admission on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #2's medical record revealed no documentation of a second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine being offered or administered. There was not any documentation of any refusals of the COVID-19 vaccine or any contraindications. During an interview on 12/08/22 at 10:20 A.M., the Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility risk assessment, review of water temperature logs, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy and procedures the facility failed to ensure the laundry room maintain proper infection control measures. In addition the facility failed to ensure an effective Legionella monitoring program was in place. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 12/03/19 at 4:40 P.M. an observation was made of the laundry room. The dirty side of the laundry room was observed to have racks of clean linens and personal laundry stored on the dirty side and the door was also observed to have clean Hoyer pads hanging on the door where the dirty barrels of cloths were dropped off at. During an interview on 12/03/19 at 4:42 P.M., the Administrator verified the laundry room had the clean linens stored on the dirty side of the laundry room where the washing machines and dirty laundry bins were located. He further verified it did not maintain proper infection control. Review of the facility policy and procedures for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the electronic medical record contained documentation of physician's orders for advanced directives for two Residents (#23 and #46) of three reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/18/19 with medical diagnoses of muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of coordination, hypertension,, pressure ulcer of left buttock stage three, dysphagia oropharyngeal phase, presence of pacemaker, pressure ulcer of right buttock stage three, pressure ulcer of left buttock unstageable, type two diabetes mellitus, and anemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23's cognition was severely impaired. Review of the hard chart for Resident #23 revealed a signed Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNR CC) advance directive. Review of the electronic medical record for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy and procedures the facility failed to ensure a request for a demand bill was carried out appropriately to ensure a resident continued to receive Medicare Part A services as requested. This affected one (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission dated of 09/20/19 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes type two, hyperkalemia, hypothyroidism, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, insomnia, essential hypertension, muscle weakness and lack of coordination. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #19 was cognitively intact without any deficits. Review of notification of discharge from therapy dated 11/11/19 documented Resident #19's last days of skilled Physical Therapy (PT) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and their responsible parties were provided with transfer discharge notices for residents hospitalization. This affected three Residents (#8, #23 and #46) of three reviewed for transfer discharge notices. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 01/23/15. Medical diagnoses included acidosis, atrial fibrillation, schizophrenia, bradycardia, hypotension, hyperkalemia, type one diabetes mellitus, fracture of neck of right femur, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, depression, acquired absence of right leg below knee, acute kidney failure, and opioid dependence. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8's cognition was intact. Further review of Resident #8's medical record revealed the resident received a bed hold letter on 08/11/19 but had not received a transfer discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were submitted within 14 days of completion to Center for Medicare & Medicare Services (CMS). This affected one (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed for resident assessments based on information submitted to CMS. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 06/17/19 with diagnoses including hemiplegia, chest pain, conversion disorder, hypertension, diabetes type two, major depressive disorder and chronic kidney disease. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented the facility was identified as not being a Medicare or Medicaid certified facility and the assessment was never submitted/transmitted to CMS. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented the facility was identified as not being a Medicare or Medicaid certified facility and the assessment was never…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to ensure care planning conferences were being held. This affected two Residents (#7 and #21) of four reviewed for care planning conferences. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 06/03/19 with diagnoses including dysphagia, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, acute stress reaction, functional urinary incontinence and cervical spinal cord injury unspecified. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #7 was cognitively intact without any deficits. Review of nursing notes from 06/03/19 through 12/04/19 lacked any documentation of Resident #7 having any care conferences held. During an interview on 12/02/19 at 11:28 A.M., Resident #7 revealed he had not had any care planning conferences. During an interview on 12/04/19 at 1:04 P.M., Social Worker Designee #50 verified Resident #7 had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a physician ordered splint was implemented. This affected one (Resident #21) of one resident reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM). The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 09/27/18 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/02/19, documented Resident #21 as having severe functional range of motion impairment to one side of her upper and lower extremity and had moderate impaired cognition. Review of physician order dated 08/06/19 revealed Resident #21 was to have a left wrist brace applied every shift and may remove for personal hygiene Review of the current comprehensive care plan dated 10/07/19 revealed Resident #21 did not have a care plan in place for her left hand brace to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy and procedure the facility failed to ensure medical care equipment was plugged into a proper electrical outlet. This affected one (Resident #15) resident during a random observation. In addition the facility failed to ensure smoking material was properly secure for a dependent resident. This affected one (Resident #8) out of two residents reviewed for smoking. The facility further failed to ensure fall interventions were in place to prevent a resident's fall. This affected one (Resident #37) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/28/13. Medical diagnoses included heart failure, diffuse traumatic brain injury, anxiety, depression, bipolar, pulmonary fibrosis, persistent vegetative state, and anoxic brain damage. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had proper diagnoses for medications and also failed to ensure blood draw orders had the correct reason. This affected one (Resident #8) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 01/23/15. Medical diagnoses included acidosis, atrial fibrillation, schizophrenia, bradycardia, hypotension, hyperkalemia, type one diabetes mellitus, fracture of neck of right femur, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, depression, acquired absence of right leg below knee, acute kidney failure, and opioid dependence. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8's cognition was intact. Review of Resident #8's physician orders revealed orders for Amiodarone (anti-arrhythmic)100 milligrams (mg) one tablet per day for other lack of coordination, Clopidigrel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of five medication carts were locked and secure. This had the potential to affect two Resident's (#44 and #45) the facility identified as independently mobile and cognitively impaired. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 05/12/18. Medical diagnoses included psychosis, depression, and chronic pain. Review of Resident #44's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was impaired and the resident was independently mobile. 2. Review of the medical record of Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 01/13/15. Medical diagnoses included dementia, hypertension, gout and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #45's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was impaired and the resident was independently mobile. Random…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide notification to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the residents' transfers to the hospital. This affected two (Residents #26 and #54) of six residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 11/09/20. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (MS), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and cerebral palsy (CP). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 was rarely/never understood. Staff assessment revealed short and long term memory problem. Review of the MDS summary revealed Resident #26 discharged with return anticipated on 06/04/22, 06/26/22, 08/13/22, 09/12/22, and 10/11/22. Interview on 12/07/22 at 5:33 P.M. with Social Services Director (SSD) #254 stated she was unable to locate the Office of the State Long-Term Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2019-12-05 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to have all require staff members attendance the quarterly Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings as required. This had the potential to effect all 48 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of second quarter QAA meeting minutes undated revealed there was no Administrator or designee in their place for the meeting. Review of third quarter QAA meeting minutes dated 10/10/19 revealed there was no Administrator or designee in their place for the meeting. On 12/03/19 at 2:46 P.M. interview with the Administrator verified the old Administrator was not present for the second and third QAA meeting due to hospitalization and a vacation. He further verified there was no other person who acted as the designee to ensure all required members were in attendance.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVENTURA HEALTH GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KASZIRER, MOISHE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 50% | since 12/01/2021 |
| SCHARF, MORDECHAI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 50% | since 12/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $932K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366302. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.