Aventura At Oakwood Village
1500 Villa Road, Springfield, OH 45503 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 116 certified beds · (937) 390-9000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.9% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.4% | 30.1% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.9% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.5% | 25.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.7% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.6% | 8.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.2% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.9% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.4% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.99 | 1.73 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.33 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 125 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 59.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.2%CMS range 31.6–46.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 7.2–14.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 59.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 53.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.7%CMS range 3.0–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 102.9 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.98 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.08 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of medical record for Resident #32 revealed admission date of 11/12/24 with vascular dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. MDS revealed Resident #32 was dependent on staff for toileting, showering, dressing, and personal hygiene. Review of the care plan dated 11/13/24, revised 02/25/25, revealed Resident #32 had a potential for falls related to impaired cognition and weakness, interventions included evaluate medication regimen, fall risk assessment per protocol, hospice to supply Bariatric shower chair, keep environment clutter free, keep room well lighted, nonskid footwear at all times, perimeter mattress, and place resident on get up list. Observation on 05/13/25 at 8:49 A.M. of Resident #32 in her room identified she was sitting on the edge of her bed eating breakfast. Resident #32 did not have a perimeter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, observation, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide foods planned by the Registered Dietitian (RD) as listed on the dietary spreadsheet. This affected all of the residents in the facility who received food from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 109 residents. Findings Include: Review of the menu spreadsheets dated 02/28/26, 03/01/26 and 03/02/26 revealed residents on all types of diets should have received two ounces of scrambled eggs at breakfast. Residents on cardiac diets should receive an egg substitution product and no bacon. There was no notation on the spreadsheets of any food substitutions. Review of Temperature Guide dated 02/28/26 revealed no notation of any food substitutions. Review of Temperature Guide dated 03/01/26 revealed substitute eggs with sausage links. Review of Temperature Guide dated 03/02/26 revealed substituted toast for pancakes and waffles. There was no egg substitution listed. Interview on 03/05/26 at 8:05 A.M. with Resident #106 confirmed he had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of facility investigation reports, review of staff witness statements, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary physical restraints. This affected one (Resident#110) of one resident reviewed for physical restraints. The facility census was 109 residents.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #110 revealed an admission date of 11/06/24 with diagnoses including cirrhosis of the liver with ascites, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and depression and a discharge date of 02/20/26. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #110 dated 02/05/26 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required partial assistance with activity of daily living (ADLs), supervision with transfers and was independent with bed mobility. Review of the care plan for Resident #110 revealed the resident had the need for restful sleep. Interventions included the following: keep the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below five percent (%). The facility had 28 medication opportunities with two medication errors for an error rate of seven This affected one (Resident #39) of six residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 109 residents.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 12/22/25 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, and hypertension. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #39 dated March 2025 revealed orders Synthroid 50 microgram (mcg) one table and glipizide 10 milligrams (mg) every morning. Observation of medication administration for Resident #39 on 03/05/26 at 7:52 A.M. per Registered Nurse (RN) #115 revealed Synthroid was not available in the medication cart or the emergency box for the resident. RN #115 pulled the card of glipizide for Resident #39 from the medication drawer but did not remove the dose before returning the card to the drawer. Prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene during incontinence care and wound care. This affected one (Resident #31) of 88 facility-identified residents who required incontinence care and one (Resident #12) of 18 facility-identified residents with wounds that required a dressing change. The facility census was 109 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 01/02/2024 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, aphasia, atrial fibrillation and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #31 dated 01/27/26 revealed the resident was dependent on staff with personal hygiene, bathing, upper body, and lower body dressing and was incontinent of bladder and bowel. Observation of incontinence care for Resident #31 on 03/05/26 at 9:56 A.M. per Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #225 revealed the CNA applied gloves prior to entering the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of statements, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident to resident abuse. This affected one (Resident #108) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 100. Based on medical record review, review of statements, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident to resident abuse. This affected one (Resident #108) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 100. Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #107 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 11/11/25. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, and intellectual disabilities.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #107 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #107 required setup or clean-up assistance for meals. Resident #107 was substantial to maximal assistance for oral care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of statements, staff interview, review of the Self-Reported Incidents and policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of resident to resident abuse were thoroughly investigated and reported to the State Agency when Resident #107 verbally assaulted one resident and had physical aggression towards another unknown resident. This affected one (#108) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 100. Based on medical record review, review of statements, staff interview, review of the Self-Reported Incidents and policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of resident to resident abuse were thoroughly investigated and reported to the State Agency when Resident #107 verbally assaulted one resident and had physical aggression towards another unknown resident. This affected one (#108) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 100. Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #107 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for a resident who was at high risk for falls. This affected one (#92) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 100. Findings Included:Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for a resident who was at high risk for falls. This affected one (#92) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 100.Findings Included:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #92 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included palliative care, Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dementia.Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #92 had an unfinished Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #92 required setup and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed five percent (%). Three errors occurred within 27 opportunities for an error rate of 11.11%. This affected two (#20 and #21) of two residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 108.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 11/13/25. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 had intact cognition. Review of the physician's orders dated 11/14/25 revealed an order for oxybutynin (treats overactive bladder) 10 milligrams (mg) extended release. Give one tablet daily until 11/17/25.Observation on11/18/25 at 8:56 A.M. of medication administration revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #100 was administering medications to Resident #20. LPN #100 administered oxybutynin chloride extended release…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an implement their water management policy to prevent the presence of microorganisms in their water system including legionella. This had the potential to affect all 104 residents residing in the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff handled food in an appropriate manner while assisting a resident with a meal. This affected one (#25) out of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of the facility's Chlorine Check off Sheet for TCU (transitional care unit) for 01/12/24 through 04/17/25 revealed water flow rate had not been tested since 10/31/24 and hot water temperatures ranged 106-117 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of the facility's Chlorine Check off Sheet for the Care Center for 01/12/24 through 05/15/25 revealed water flow rate had not been tested since 10/31/24 and hot water temperatures ranged 102-120 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of the facility's Chlorine Check off Sheet for the basement for 01/04/24 through 03/31/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed have an effective pest control program. This affected six (#9, #29, #30, #55, #60, and #81) out of six residents reviewed for effective pest control. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Interview on 05/13/25 at 7:37 A.M. revealed Resident #29 has had ants in the room. Ants had been on eyeglasses and on the bed. Resident #29 reported telling staff about the ant concern. Resident #29 had called the Administrator and left a massage about ants. Observation of Resident #29's room during the interview on 05/13/25 at 7:37 A.M. revealed ants on the floor and on the bedside table. Interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #241 confirmed she had seen ants in Resident #29's room. During an interview on 05/13/25 at 7:50 A.M. the Administrator confirmed ants in Resident #29's room. The Administrator denied receiving a call from Resident #29. A local pest control company will be called to control the ants. Observation of Resident #9's room on 05/13/25 at 7:51 A.M. revealed ants crawling on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff and resident interviews and policy review, facility failed to ensure a resident was afforded dignity during a meal when staff did not stand while providing feeding assistance. This affected one (#25) of three residents reviewed for dignity. Facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 04/20/22. Diagnoses included parkinsonism and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident #25 had intact cognition. Resident #25 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Observation on 05/14/25 at 12:38 P.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #252 delivered a lunch tray to Resident #25, who was resting in bed. CNA #252 set up Resident #25's tray and began to feed her, while standing over her. Observation on 05/14/25 at 12:39 P.M., Resident #25 asked CNA #252 if she was going to sit down. CNA #252 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify resident responsible party/power of attorney (POA) of significant weight loss. This affected one (#37) of three residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 09/18/20. The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included aspiration pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, prostate cancer, type 2 diabetes mellitus, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the 5-day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. The resident required set-up/clean-up assistance for eating, substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility, and was dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, dressing, and transfers. Review of weights revealed, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medications by ensuring as needed psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days. This affected one (#61) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Facility census was 104. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 11/01/23. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, malnutrition, vascular dementia and unspecified psychosis. Review of the plan of care dated 03/19/24 revealed resident had a history of becoming aggressive and resisting care with interventions to administer medications as ordered and monitor behaviors. The care plan revealed resident used psychotropic medications related to anxiety and depression with interventions to give medications as ordered and monitor for side effects. The care plan also stated residents used antipsychotic's with interventions to consult with pharmacy, give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and record review, facility failed to ensure the activity careplan had appropriate and resident centered interventions. This affected one Resident (#49) of one reviewed for activities. Facility census was 104. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 07/03/18. Diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain, unspecified psychosis, anxiety, and spinal stenosis. Review of the activity assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident was alert and oriented with come confusion. Resident reported she was religious (Catholic) and enjoyed baking/cooking, country music, and television, movies and dogs. Review of the plan of care dated 03/03/23 revealed Resident #49 was at risk for alteration in activities with interventions for one on one activities. Review of the activity assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident had unchanged preferences and the preferences were for one to one activity participation. Review of the Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure facility offered a resident activities of interest. This affected one (#49) of one resident reviewed for activities. The facility census was 104. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 07/03/18. Diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain, unspecified psychosis, anxiety, and spinal stenosis. Review of the activity assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident was alert and oriented with come confusion. Resident reported she was religious (Catholic) and enjoyed baking/cooking, country music, and television, movies and dogs. Review of the plan of care dated 03/03/23 revealed Resident #49 was at risk for alteration in activities with interventions for one on one activities. Review of the activity assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident had unchanged preferences and the preferences were for one to one activity participation. Review of the Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of medical record for Resident # 58 revealed admission date of 02/19/2024 with end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, dependence on renal dialysis, heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Review of the care plan dated 03/27/25 revealed Resident #58 had renal insufficiency related to end stage chronic kidney disease stage 3 (CKD-3). Interventions included monitoring, documenting, and reporting to physician as needed the following signs and symptoms. Edema, weight gain of over two pounds a day, neck vein distension, difficulty breathing (dyspnea), increased heart rate (tachycardia), elevated blood pressure (hypertension), skin temperature, peripheral pulses, level of consciousness, monitor breath sounds for crackles. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order for daily weights one time a day for congestive heart failure (CHF)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #91 revealed an admission date of 03/25/25 with diagnoses of unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Medicare-5 Day MDS dated [DATE] revealed resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the Care Plan, dated 04/15/25 revealed resident is at risk for altered Cardiovascular, has Seizure Disorder/Narcolepsy, uses antidepressant medications related to anxiety depression, and mood disorder, and is at risk for negative mood / behavior related to diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Interventions include administer medications as ordered. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 05/01/25 through 05/31/25 revealed the following medications were not administered on 05/07/25 Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet 25 MG 0.5 tablet with the Code #16, see nurse note. The following medications were not administered on 05/08/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of arbitration agreements and staff resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was capable of understanding an arbitration agreement before signing. This affected one (#90) of three residents reviewed for arbitration agreements. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of Resident #90's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/16/25. Diagnoses listed included emphysema, hypertension, malnutrition, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of progress noted dated 04/16/25 at 7:35 P.M. revealed Resident #90 was alert to self with some confusion. Review of a daily skilled summary dated 04/17/25 at 3:45 A.M. revealed Resident #90 was alert with both long term and short term memory deficits. Resident #90 could probably make limited decision that require simple understanding. Review of a form titled, RESIDENT AND FACILITY…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an incident regarding an injury of unknown origin as required. This affected one (Resident #4) of three residents reviewed for injuries. The census was 108. Findings Include: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnoses included fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation, polyneuropathy, atherosclerotic heart disease, brief psychotic disorder, hyperlipidemia, difficulty walking, degenerative disease of nervous system, hypertension, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the 11/08/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #4's progress notes, dated 12/13/24, revealed an incident in which Resident #4 was being transferred via a mechanical lift. During the process, her arm got caught in the machine and sustained a small skin tear. In…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation regarding an injury of unknown origin as required. This affected one (Resident #4) of three residents reviewed for injuries. The census was 108. Findings Include: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnoses included fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur dated 12/18/24, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation, polyneuropathy, atherosclerotic heart disease, brief psychotic disorder, hyperlipidemia, difficulty walking, degenerative disease of nervous system, hypertension, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/08/24, revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #4's progress notes, dated 12/13/24, revealed an incident in which Resident #4 was being transferred via mechanical lift. During the process, her arm got caught in the machine and she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to obtain a laboratory value (labs) as ordered by physician. The affected one (#4) out of four residents reviewed for lab services. The census was 107. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 09/13/24. Diagnoses listed included heart failure, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, type two diabetes mellitus, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had intact cognition and was occasionally incontinent of urine. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 09/23/24 to collect an urinalysis (UA) with reflex culture. Further review of Resident #4's closed medical record revealed no documentation of the UA with reflex culture being collected on 09/23/24. The review revealed there was no laboratory results were documented. Review of hospital documentation dated 10/04/24 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse. This affected two (Residents #4 and #21) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was cognitively impaired. Resident required set-up assistance with eating, required supervision assistance with wheelchair mobility, required partial assistance with oral hygiene and bed mobility, and required substantial assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, and transfers. Review of the care plan dated 07/22/24 revealed Resident #4 was at risk for alteration in mood state due to dementia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to communicate with the physician about family concerns related to the discontinuation of a medication. This affected one (Resident #4) out of four residents reviewed for medication changes. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was cognitively impaired. Resident required set-up assistance with eating, required supervision assistance with wheelchair mobility, required partial assistance with oral hygiene and bed mobility, and required substantial assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, and transfers. Review of the medical record revealed Brexpiprazole (Rexulti) Oral Tablet 0.5 milligrams (mg) was ordered on 07/23/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place to prevent resident injury from falls. This affected two (Residents #20 and #41) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 111 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 05/24/11 with diagnoses including diabetes, malnutrition, heart disease, anxiety, chronic pain, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #20 dated 12/26/23 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required partial to moderate assistance for ambulation, moving in bed, and moving from a sitting to a standing position. Review of the plan of care for Resident #20 updated 02/07/24 revealed the resident was at risk for falls due to decreased endurance, impaired judgment and cognitive impairment. Interventions included the following: assist with toileting as needed, bilateral bedrails to enable mobility in bed, keep call light and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage of food and to ensure trash cans were covered when in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all residents, excluding Resident #24 who does not eat food from the kitchen. Facility census was 105. Findings include: Observation on 07/24/23 from 9:37 A.M. to 10:18 A.M. revealed the following findings in the kitchen area. In the refrigerated areas there were the following items uncovered or not dated: over 10 pudding cups undated; two premade salads uncovered; two premade salads undated; over 10 cups of potato salad; six fruit parfait uncovered; over 20 cups of Jello uncovered; over 15 cups of mixed fruit uncovered; a block of cheese slices was uncovered and undated; a opened package of lunch meat was undated; broccoli salad undated; pack of hotdogs undated; green beans with bacon undated; two containers of unidentified red liquid substance (looked similar to vegetable soup) was unlabeled and undated; macaroni and cheese was undated; unknown soup was undated; sausage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility menu and spreadsheets for residents with altered textured diets. This affected 24 (#1, #2, #3, #7, #11, #16, #26, #30, #35, #40, #50, #52, #59, #62, #64, #67, #70, #71, #73, #76, #87, #89, #210 and #204) of 24 residents with orders for pureed and mechanical soft diets. Facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the facility menu for dated 07/26/23 revealed facility was serving turkey club sandwiches, a balsamic tomato cucumber salad, chips, and pineapple tidbits. Review of the menu spreadsheets for mechanical soft diets dated 07/26/23 revealed the lunch meal included ground turkey sandwich with shredded lettuce and diced tomatoes, diced tomatoes in place of the salad, ranch pasta salad in place of the chips and crushed pineapple. Review of the menu spreadsheets for pureed diets dated 07/26/23 revealed the lunch meal included a turkey sandwich with lettuce, tomatoes, and cheese that was made into a pureed texture with 2 scoops, pureed tomatoes in place of the salad, pureed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify residents that the amount of funds in their accounts was 200 dollars less than the social security income resource limit and that the resident's may lose eligibility for Medicaid or social security income. This affected two (#16 and #40) of five residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/15/16, with diagnoses including: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, major depressive disorder, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be severely cognitively impaired and Resident #16 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, eating, toileting, and personal hygiene. Resident #16 only transferred once or twice during the review period. Review of Resident #16's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to have accurate advance directives in the electronic and medical record. This affected two (#70 and #71) of four residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #70's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/15/23, with diagnoses of fracture of humerus right arm, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypotension, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene, toilet use, dressing, transfer, and bed mobility. The Resident uses a walker to aid in mobility and is frequently incontinent. Review of Resident #70's paper medical record on 07/25/23 at 11:04 A.M., revealed the resident had a do not resuscitate comfort care (DNR-CC) form in the paper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, fall alarm list review, incident report review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed to utilize a position change alarm (pull-tab alarm). This affected one (#86) of seven residents reviewed for falls. The facility identified three residents with pull-tab fall alarms in the facility. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the Resident #86's medical record revealed admitted to than admission date of 05/25/23, with diagnoses including: hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease stage three, osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, and hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #86's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toileting, transfers, and personal hygiene. Resident #86 required supervision with eating and had fallen in the last month prior to admission. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop resident care plans for anticoagulant medication use, oxygen use, and psychotropic medication use. This affected three (#51, #60, and #73) resident of 22 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident 51's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/03/20, with diagnoses including: transient cerebral ischemic attack, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, diarrhea, schizoaffective disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #51's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #51 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toileting, transfers, and personal hygiene. Resident #51 required supervision with eating and received anticoagulant medication during the review period. Review of Resident #51's physician orders dated 09/24/23 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's fall care plan was updated to include new fall interventions. This affected two (#86 and #66) of 22 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the Resident #86's medical record revealed admitted to than admission date of 05/25/23, with diagnoses including: hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease stage three, osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, and hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #86's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toileting, transfers, and personal hygiene. Resident #86 required supervision with eating and had fallen in the last month prior to admission. Review of Resident #86's fall assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #86 was at moderate risk for falls. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician's response to a pharmacy recommendation was followed. This affected one (#52) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the Resident #52's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/18/17, with diagnoses including: fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, depression, dysphagia, aphasia following cerebral infarction, cerebral infarction, anemia, anxiety disorder, unspecified convulsions, and mixed hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #52's quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 was severely cognitively impaired and was prescribed insulin, antianxiety medication, antidepressant medication, and opioids. Review of Resident #52's medication regimen review dated 10/17/22 revealed medications for seizures. Resident #52 was being monitored routinely for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review, facility failed to ensure facility made pureed food in a way to keep nutritive values. This affected three (#1, #40 and #67) of three residents with orders for pureed diets. Facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the facility menu for dated 07/26/23 revealed facility was serving turkey club sandwiches, a balsamic tomato cucumber salad, chips, and pineapple tidbits. Review of the menu spreadsheets for mechanical soft diets dated 07/26/23 revealed the lunch meal included ground turkey sandwich with shredded lettuce and diced tomatoes, diced tomatoes in place of the salad, ranch pasta salad in place of the chips and crushed pineapple. Review of the menu spreadsheets for pureed diets dated 07/26/23 revealed the lunch meal included a turkey sandwich with lettuce, tomatoes, and cheese that was made into a pureed texture with 2 scoops, pureed tomatoes in place of the salad, pureed ranch pasta salad in place of the chips and pureed peaches in place…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain resident furniture/equipment in safe working order. This affected one (#72) of one resident reviewed for environment. Facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 10/26/22,with diagnoses including femur fracture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hemiparesis and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility and transfers. Observation on 07/24/23 at 10:41 A.M., revealed Resident #72's bed side table had two gold ball size chunks broken off with rough edges. Interview on 07/24/23 at 10:42 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #201 confirmed residents over the bed table was broken with jagged edges on one side. STNA #201 revealed it had been that way. Interview and observation on 07/26/23 at 3:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility record review, staff interview, review of the facility's policy, review of the online resources from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and memorandums from the centers for Medicare and Medicaid services (CMS), the facility failed to implement a water treatment program that followed the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRA) industry standards and the CDC toolkit for prevention of Legionella. This had the potential to affect all 80 resident who resided in the facility. Findings included: During the facilities infection control log books and programs on 07/15/21 at 2:00 P.M. revealed the facility failed to implement an appropriate water treatment program to monitor and prevent the spread of Legionnaires Disease. The facility did not have any records of routine maintenance, cleaning and water treatment services. Review of the facility's policy titled Monitoring Waterborne Organisms, dated 05/19/17, revealed the facility would provide guidance for monitoring the domestic and open water systems suspected of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to provide a safe and comfortable environment for the residents. This affected one (#38) of 24 residents reviewed for physical environment and had the potential to affect all 80 residents who resided in the facility. Findings included: 1. During an observation of the laundry area on 07/15/21 at 9:25 A.M. revealed the facility had three natural gas dryers in operation. Further observation revealed dryer #1 (far left) was on and the burner assembly compartment had excessive amount of dryer lint in the compartment. Further observation of dryers #2 and #3 revealed an excessive amount of dryer lint in the burner assembly compartments. Interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 07/15/21 at 9:27 A.M. verified the excessive lint build up in the burner assembly compartments in all three dryers. Interview with Director of Support Services (DSS) #30 on 07/15/21 at 1:30 P.M. indicated the facility maintenance staff were supposed to clean out the burner assembly compartments. DSS #30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents personal funds were managed appropriately. This affected two (#4 and #49) of five resident reviewed for personal funds. The facility identified six residents with a personal funds account managed by the facility. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dementia and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/23/21, revealed Resident #4 was rarely to never understood and had short and long term memory problems. Review of a document titled Trust Statement, dated 06/30/21, revealed a deposit was made into Resident #4's personal funds account on 05/17/21 for 1,400.00 dollars. The deposit was identified as stimulus. Continued review of the trust statement revealed the 1,400.00 dollars stimulus deposited on 05/17/21 was withdrawn from the account for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative of the bed hold and reserve bed payment policy upon the resident's transfer to the hospital. This affected one (#79) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic bronchitis, and irritable bowel syndrome. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/02/21, revealed Resident #79 had intact cognition. Review of a progress note, dated 05/02/21 at 8:50 A.M., revealed Resident #79's oxygen saturation was 60. The resident had diminished lung sounds with wheezing and was using accessory muscles to breath. The resident complained of nausea. Four liters of oxygen was administered to the resident and the resident's oxygen saturation increased to 86. The physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident and family interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to have quarterly care conferences and include the resident and the resident's representatives to participate in care planning. This affected one (#5) of one resident reviewed for care planning. This had the potential to affect all 80 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 03/23/19. Diagnoses included unspecified cord compression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, unspecified edema, pharyngeal phase dysphagia, hypotension, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and osteoarthritis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/18/21, revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the progress notes, dated 01/01/20 through 07/14/21, revealed care conferences were held on 01/23/20, 07/02/20, and 10/19/20. There was no evidence of any further communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician documented rationale for disagreeing with the pharmacy recommendations. This affected two (#12 and #47) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 05/20/20. Diagnoses included gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/01/21, revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the physician orders, dated 06/21/21, revealed an order for Reglan (anti-vomiting agent) 10 milligrams (mg.) by mouth four times per day. The orders were not changed as of 07/14/21. Review of the Consultant Pharmacist admission Review, dated 06/22/21, revealed a pharmacologic concern regarding the resident receiving Metocloprimide (Reglan) 10 mg. four times daily for GERD. Further instructions were documented Metocloprimide can cause extrapyramidal effects. May wish to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain lab work as ordered by the physician and the facility failed to ensure laboratory results were promptly reported to the advanced provider. This affected two (#19 and #47) of eight residents reviewed for laboratory orders. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 04/05/21. Diagnoses included heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/21/21, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Review of the physician's orders, dated 05/14/21, revealed an order for a Digoxin level (to monitor for toxicity and/or low levels of Digoxin) to be drawn on 05/18/21. Review of Resident #47's labs revealed no evidence of a Digoxin level being completed as ordered. Interview on 07/14/21 at 11:44 A.M. with the Administrator verified no Digoxin level was completed on 05/18/21 as ordered, nor had a Digoxin level been checked since the lab work was ordered on 05/14/21. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVENTURA HEALTH GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AWESOME HEALTHCARE ASSETS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 03/01/2022 |
| EOM HEALTH CARE HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 03/01/2022 |
| SYHEHE DOTOA TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | since 03/01/2022 |
| WHITE HORSE FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | since 03/01/2022 |
| KASZIRER, MOISHE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2022 |
| SCHARF, MORDECHAI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365917. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.