Aventura At Prospect
815 Chester Pike, Prospect Park, PA 19076 · For profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (610) 586-6262 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jul 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $23,624 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-05)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.4% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.1% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.2% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.1% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.6% | 20.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.7% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.8% | 25.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.6% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 40.3% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.1% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.9% | 9.5% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.70 | 1.62 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.13 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 77 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.0%CMS range 31.2–52.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.6–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 29.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 88.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.3%CMS range 5.3–14.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 148.9 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
63 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interview with resident and staff, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately supervise one of six residents reviewed (Resident R2), who was able to board a bus and train and elope from the facility. This failure placed Resident R2 at high risk for injury and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. (Resident R2) Findings include: Review of the facility's policy title Elopement/ Missing Resident revealed that it is goal of the facility to provide a safe environment and to identify residents who are at risk for elopement. It strives to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. Under the heading Responsibility it stated that it is the responsibility of all staff members to report any residents suspected of not being in the facility, or attempting to leave the building, without checking out, in accordance with established policies immediately. Review of facility's policy titled Resident LOA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-09 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff, review of hospital records and review of policy and procedure, it was determined that the facility failed to properly discharge Resident Cl1 who was assessed by the facility as requiring guidance for safety awareness and problems with short term memory for one of three closed records reviewed. (Resident Cl1) This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for Resident Cl1 whose safety device was removed by facility staff allowing the resident to exit the building, discharging the resident against medical advice to an unknown location and without returning resident's identification documents. Further the facility failed to notify the required State authorities and resident's family of the resident's discharge. (Resident Cl1) Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Discharging a Resident without a Physician's Approval dated August 2022, revealed that the resident's attending physician must be notified of a resident or resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility documentation and clinical records, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that one of four residents reviewed (Resident R51) was adequately secured during transportation in the facility's van. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R51 who sustained a fracture of the right knee after sliding out of the wheelchair on the way to an appointment. (Resident R51) Findings Include: Review of Resident R51's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated February 5, 2025, revealed the resident had diagnoses of muscle weakness, lack of coordination, Aphasia (communication disorder), Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA - stoke; loss of blood flow to part of the brain), Hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body). Continued review of Resident R51's MDS assessment revealed the resident's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental status) score of 14, which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to post the State Survey Agency phone number and contact information readily accessible on the two of two nursing floors. (1st Floor, and 2nd Nursing Units) Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident's Right to Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property and Exploitation dated November 25, 2024 states, Policy- It is the policy of the facility to ensure that all residents rights are upheld and that residents are free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of their property, and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. The policy applies to all any and all owners, directors, officers, clinical staff, employees, independent contractors, consultants and others currently are potentially working for the facility. A tour of the facility was taken with the facility Director of Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, observations, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was served in accordance with the planned menus for one of four days observed (lunch meal 3/18/2026).Findings Include: Review of the facility menu revealed the lunch meal offered on March 18, 2026, was listed as tomato soup, grilled American cheese sandwich, mixed vegetables, crackers, chilled peaches, and a beverage. There was no alternate lunch item listed on the main menu; however, the facility had an always available menu with daily food items available at lunch and dinner. The undated always available food menu consisted of cottage cheese, fresh fruit, chicken salad sandwich, grilled cheese sandwich, hot dog, turkey hoagie, and cheeseburger. Review of diet type report dated March 18, 2026, revealed Resident R46 and R26 had physician orders for nectar thick liquids. Review of facility production sheets for the lunchtime meal service on 3/18/2026 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, observations, and interviews with staff and residents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food was served for palatable taste and temperature. Findings Include: Review of the facility's undated Test Tray Evaluation form revealed the acceptable delivery temperature of the starch and vegetable should be 135-165 degrees Fahrenheit. A test tray was conducted during the lunch time meal service on March 18, 2026, at 12:25 p.m. with the Food Service, Employee E18, and the Nursing Home Administrator, Employee E1. The test tray consisted of three pureed food items that was supposed to be pureed mac and cheese, mashed potato, and mixed vegetables. Temperatures and tastings revealed the food temperature resulted below standards at 110 degrees Fahrenheit and had a bland, unfamiliar taste. The pureed vegetables tasted more like pureed meat. Nursing Home Administrator, Employee E1, also tasted the food and agreed with surveyor's findings of the test tray. 28 PA Code 201.18(b)(3) Management
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility's policy, interview with staff, and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined that facility did not ensure to maintain an effective antibiotic stewardship program that includes ongoing tracking, analysis, and reporting of antibiotic use for 11 of 11 months reviewed (May 2025 through March 2026)Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Antibiotic stewardship,' revised December 2016, indicates its purpose is to monitor the use of antibiotics in residents. Review of facility policy 'Infection Prevention and Control Program,' revised December 2025, indicates that the infection prevention program (IPC) provides the framework through which the infection preventionist and the facility can: educate staff and ensure adherence to evidence-based infection prevention and control practices; identify infections and standardized definitions; identify significant pathogens using laboratory culture and sensitivity testing; monitor for outbreaks; ensure the appropriate use of antibiotics; adhere to mandatory reporting requirements. Further review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and facility provided documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility did not ensure to maintain an effective antibiotic stewardship program that includes a system to effectively monitor antibiotic usage for 11 of 11 months of antibiotic stewardship program data reviewed (May 2026 through March 2026)Findings include:According to Patient Safety Authority (PSA), Act 52 of 2007 revised the MCARE Act to require nursing homes to report healthcare associated infections (HAI's) to PSA. Specifically, the act states that the occurrences of a healthcare-associated infection in a healthcare facility shall be deemed a serious event as defined in section 302. HAI's infections are deemed serious events and are submitted into PA PSRS for tracking, analysis, and statewide patient safety improvement. Main infection types reported in nursing homes include skin and soft tissue infections, urinary tract infections, respiratory tract infections, gastrointestinal infections as well as illnesses related to influenza. Review of facility's policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, interviews with residents, and facility record review it was determined that the facility did not ensure an effective pest control program was maintained so that the facility is free of pests and rodents for two of two nursing floors reviewed. (First floor and Second floor) Findings Include: Review of pest control policy titled, Pest Control dated April 1, 2022 states, Policy Statement-The facility shall maintain an effective pest control program. Further review of the policy revealed, Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents Interview held with six awake, alert, and oriented resident on March 18, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. During resident council four of the residents reported having mice and roaches in their room at times. (Residents R12, R41. R101). Resident R12 reported that the mice problem has gotten worse over time. Resident R12 reports that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff and residents it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation to rule out neglect for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident R24).Findings Include: Review of facility policy Residents Right to Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property and Exploitation effective/revised 2025 revealed it is the policy of the facility to ensure that all resident's rights are upheld and that residents are free from abuse, neglect, misappropriate of their property, and exploitation. Continued review of facility policy Residents Right to Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property and Exploitation revealed in response to allegations of abuse or neglect the facility will ensure that alleged violations are thoroughly investigated. Review of Resident R24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan related to restraints and restorative nursing program for two of 30 residents reviewed (Resident R1 and R13).Findings include: Review of facility policy, Care Plan - Comprehensive Person Centered dated revised March 2022, revealed that care plans include measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Review of Resident R1's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool) dated February 1, 2026, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including pulmonary hypertension(type of high blood pressure that affects the arteries in the lungs) and acute and chronic respiratory failure (condition in which blood doesn't have enough oxygen or too much carbon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview with resident and staff, and review of policy and clinical record, it was determined that facility did not ensure that resident received necessary assistance with activities of daily living, related to bathing, grooming and personal hygiene for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident R86)Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Resident's Right to Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property and Exploitation,' revised in 2025, defines Neglect as the failure of a facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. This includes the failure to meet a resident's basic needs such as food, water, hygiene, and essential medical care. Review of Resident R86's clinical record revealed medical history of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis) affecting right dominant side, unsheltered homelessness, post traumatic stress disorder, cardiomyopathy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interviews with resident and staff, and review of clinical records and facility policy it was determined the facility failed to ensure rehabilitative nursing care was provided to two of 31 resident records reviewed (Resident R1 and Resident R7). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Restorative Nursing Services, dated July 2017, states Residents will receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. Policy Interpretation and Implementation- 1. Restorative nursing care consists of nursing interventions that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitative services (e.g. physical, occupational or speech therapies). 2. Residents may be started on a restorative nursing program upon admission during the course of stay or when discharged from rehabilitation care. 3. Restorative goals and objectives are individualized and resident- centered and are outlined in the resident's plan of care. Review of Resident R1's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 50 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff and residents it was determined that the facility failed to provide assistance devices necessary to prevent an avoidable accident for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident R24).Findings Include: Review of Resident R24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated December 9, 2025, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of malnutrition (imbalance in a person's energy/nutrient intake), hemiplegia (paralysis that affects one side of the body) affecting left-side, contracture of right hand, and homonymous bilateral field defects (visual impairments affecting the same side of the visual field in both eyes). Continued review of Resident R24's MDS dated [DATE], revealed the resident was assessed as cognitively intact. Per Resident R24's physical therapy treatment notes dated January 24, 2026, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff and residents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring and timely reassessment to maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition status for 3 of 9 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident R1, R87, and R11).Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Weight Policy with a revision date on July 2025 states, Policy- It is the policy of this facility to weigh each resident on admission, weekly for four weeks, then monthly thereafter, unless otherwise ordered by the physician/interdisciplinary team. The facility will utilize consistent procedures for monitoring weights to prevent unnecessary weight loss/gain in our residents. Any resident displaying a significant change in weight of greater than or equal to 5%, gain or loss in one month will be reported to the Registered Dietitian and reweighed. Review of undated facility documentation Clinical Dietitian Job…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of clinical record and review of policy, as well as interview with staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure the accurate administration of psychotropic medication by administering a medication at a dose different from that prescribed for one of three residents observed (Resident R50)Findings include: Review of Resident R50's clinical record revealed medical history of bipolar disorder (condition in which a person has period of depression and periods of being extremely happy), schizoaffective disorder, drug induced parkinsonism (progressive disease of the central nervous system), generalized anxiety disorder, psychosis, drug induced subacute dyskinesis (involuntary, abnormal movements that develop days to weeks after starting or changing a medication; commonly caused by antipsychotics such as haloperidol/risperidone, antiemetics or antidepressants), recurrent depressive disorders, schizophrenia (mental disease characterized by loss of reality contact). Review of psychiatric progress note, completed on March 5, 2026, by Nurse practitioner…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and review of facility provided documentation, and review of clinical records, it was determined that facility failed to timely monitor and assess a resident's medical condition for one of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of history of hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, acute or chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia and schizophrenia (mental disease characterized by loss of reality contact). Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of resident needs), completed on [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident was cognitive intact. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that on Friday, [DATE] at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Review of Resident R2 ' s quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated August 5, 2025, revealed the resident was rarely/never understood and had diagnoses of hemiplegia or hemiparesis, and functional quadriplegia. Continued review of Resident R2's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed the resident had functional limitation in range of motion impairments on both sides of upper extremity.Review of Section GG0170. Mobility of Resident R2's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed the resident was dependent (helper does ALL of the effort. Resident does none of the effort to complete the activity. Or, the assistance of 2 or more helpers is required for the resident to complete the activity) on staff to roll left and right (the ability to roll from lying on back to left and right side, and return to lying on back on the bed). Review of Resident R2's comprehensive care plan dated August 13, 2021, revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to immobility. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings Include: Review of facility policy Dishwashing Machine Use revised March 2010 revealed dishwashing machine chemical sanitizer for use of chlorine solution, the minimum concentration should be 50-100 ppm (parts-per-million) for a contact time of 10 seconds. A tour of the main kitchen conducted on May 5, 2025, 9:30 a.m. with Food Service Director, Employee E29, revealed the following: Observations of the walk-in refrigerator revealed an open large sleeve of ground beef, poorly resealed, and not labeled with received or open date. The opened sleeve of ground beef was placed on top of a new, unopened box (delivered earlier in morning of 5/5/2025) of ground beef. The opened sleeve of ground beef was observed with raw meat drippings on the new box. Observations and interview revealed the main kitchen utilizes a low water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to make financial record available to the resident through quarterly statements and upon request for one out one resident reviewed. (Resident R63). Findings include: On May 6, 2025, at approximately 12:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident R63. The resident stated that they do not have access to their $3,000.00 and expressed a desire to gain access to these funds. On May 7, 2025, at 1:22 p.m., an interview was held with the Business Office Manager (Employee E22) and the Regional Business Office Manager, Employee E23. They reported that the previous Business Office Manager-who is no longer employed at the facility-did not maintain records indicating when or how residents and their representatives received quarterly financial statements. Employee E23 further confirmed that efforts are currently underway to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that residents and their representatives receive financial statements on a quarterly basis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility policies and documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pharmacist recommendations were reviewed by the physician in a timely manner for four of five residents reviewed related to medication regime reviews (Residents R48, R86, R85 and R125). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Pharmacy Services Policy and Procedure dated 2025, revealed, The drug regimen of each resident shall be reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist . The pharmacist shall report any irregularities to the attending physician and the Facility's medical director and director of nursing, who shall act upon these reports . The attending physician shall document in the resident's medical record that the identified irregularity has been reviewed and what, if any, action has been taken to address it. If there is to be no change in the medication, the attending physician shall document his or her rationale in the resident's medical record. Review of Resident R85's Medication Regimen Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for two of three nursing units and the main kitchen (2nd floor South nursing unit, 1-North Nursing Unit, and main kitchen ). Findings include: Review of facility policy Pest control dated April 1, 2022, revealed Aventura at Prospect shall maintain an effective pest control program. 1. The facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents.2. Pest control services are provided a contracted vendor. 3. Only approved FDA and EPA insecticides and rodenticides are permitted in the facility and all such supplies are stored in areas away from food storage areas. 4. Garbage and trash are not permitted to accumulate and are removed from the facility daily. 5. Maintenance services assist, when appropriate and necessary, in providing pest control services. Interview during an initial tour…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility policy and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to protect personal property of Resident's (R68) by removing items from her/his room without prior notice. This failure resulted in the facility not providing an environment that maintains and enhances the dignity of one of 30 residents reviewed. (Resident R68) Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Safeguarding Resident Property Policy and Procedure undated, revealed To ensure that residents' personal possessions are property safeguarded, while not limiting residents from using their personal possessions. On May 6, 2025, at 10:46 a.m., Resident R68 attended a resident council meeting. Following the meeting, Resident R68 entered the conference room in tears and reported that the facility had removed her personal boxes from her room with no prior notice. She also stated that the Social Worker handed her a letter, which was neither dated nor signed. At 12:02 p.m., an observation was conducted, and it was noted that several boxes previously placed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for three of three nursing units observed (2 South Nursing Unit, 2 North Nursing Unit and 1 North Nursing Unit). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Quality of Life - Homelike Environment revised May 2017, revealed, Staff shall provide person-centered care that emphasizes the residents' comfort, independence and personal needs and preferences. Continued review revealed, Comfortable and adequate lighting is provided in all areas of the facility to promote a safe, comfortable and homelike environment. On May 5, 2025, at 12:27 p.m., an observation was conducted on the 2 North Nursing Unit in room [ROOM NUMBER]-D, where it was noted that Resident R68 had approximately six different boxes on the floor next to her bed and window. Underneath the bed, the entire floor was covered with various boxes containing open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews with residents and staff, review grievance, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility did not ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve residents' grievances and/or concerns for 7 of 7 residents interviewed (Residents R79, R52, R63, R61, R46, R68, R98) and related to missing items for one of 30 resident records reviewed (Resident R54). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Resident and Family Concerns and Grievances Policy and Procedure not dated, states, To provide for the prompt resolution of medical and non-medical grievances while maintaining confidentiality, in accordance with applicable federal and state statutes and regulations. On May 6, 2025, at 9:52 a.m. an interview was held with Resident R54 who reported that this is the second time when facility has lost her clothing when she gave the housekeeping staff to wash her items. Reported her missing items to the Social Worker a month ago and she has not heard back. On May 6, 2025, at 10:46 a.m. an resident council meeting was held with seven alert and oriented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation and maintain documentation that an allegation of neglect was thoroughly investigated for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R51). Findings Include: Review of undated facility policy Residents Right to Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy and Procedure revealed in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment the facility should have evidence that alleged violations are thoroughly investigated and prevent further abuse, neglect, or mistreatment while the investigation is in progress. Further review of facility policy revealed that the results of investigations should be reported to the administrator and State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident. Review of Resident R51's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated February 5, 2025, revealed the resident had diagnoses of muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility policies and staff interviews, it was determined that the PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was not appropriately completed according to the resident assessment for three of three residents reviewed related to PASRR assessments (Residents R24, R63 and R125). Findings include: The PASRR (Preadmission Screening Resident Review) was created in 1987 through language in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) and it has three goals: to identify individuals with mental illness and/or intellectual disability, to ensure they are placed appropriately, whether in the community or in a nursing facility, and to ensure they receive the services they require for their mental illness or intellectual disability. The PASRR Level 1 must be completed on all persons who are considering admission to a Medicaid certified nursing facility. A Level II PASRR evaluation must be completed if the Level 1 PASRR determined that the person is a targeted person with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority of a significant change in a mental health condition for one of three residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screening (Resident R24). Findings Include: The PASRR (Preadmission Screening Resident Review) was created in 1987 through language in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) and it has three goals: to identify individuals with mental illness and/or intellectual disability, to ensure they are placed appropriately, whether in the community or in a nursing facility, and to ensure they receive the services they require for their mental illness or intellectual disability. Review of Resident Assessment Policy and Procedure dated 2025 revealed The Facility shall notify the state mental health authority or state intellectual disability authority, as applicable, promptly after a significant change in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline careplan for one of two new admissions reviewed (Resident R449). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning Policy and Procedure dated 2025, revealed, the facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan, within 48 hours of a resident's admission, that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. Review of Resident 449's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a diagnosis of opioid dependence with other opioid-induced disorder, and cannabis abuse with other cannabis-induced disorder. Continued review of Resident R449's clinical record revealed a History and Physical dated May 3, 2025, by Physician, Employee E28, that indicated Resident R449 was a new admit to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans related to behavioral health needs for one of 34 residents reviewed (Resident R85). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning Policy and Procedure dated 2025, revealed, The Facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident . that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet each resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Review of Resident R85's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated April 1, 2025, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), Parkinson's Disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to promptly assess a resident status post a fall for one of two residents reviewed for falls (Resident R51). Findings Include: Review of Resident R51's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated February 5, 2025, revealed the resident had diagnoses of muscle weakness, lack of coordination, Aphasia (communication disorder), Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA - stoke; loss of blood flow to part of the brain), Hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body). Continued review of Resident R51's MDS assessment revealed the resident's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental status) score of 14, which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS assessment indicated Resident R51 used a wheelchair for mobility. Review of Resident R51's comprehensive care plan dated January 18, 2018, revealed the resident had a potential for falls…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with limited range of motion received treatment and services to maintain or improve range of motion/mobility for two of 34 residents reviewed for limited range of motion (Resident R1 and Resident R36). Findings include: Review of facility policy on Restorative Nursing Services with a most recent revision date of October 31, 2024 revealed that under section POLICY STATEMENT: Residents will receive restorative nursing care and services as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. PROCEDURE #1. Residents may be started on a restorative nursing program upon admission, during their course of stay or upon discharge from rehabilitative care. #2. A registered nurse will complete an assessment before establishing a restorative nursing program for program additions on admission or during the course of stay. Therapy will provide program…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records and facility policies and procedures, observations of care and services, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide respiratory care and supplemental oxygen as ordered by the physician for one of 30 residents reviewed. (Resident R95). Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration dated April 1, 2022, stated The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Bulletin # 1 under Preparation paragraph further stated verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. A review of the clinical record for Resident R95 revealed an admission date of September 15, 2021, with diagnoses including chronic pulmonary edema, heart failure, and both acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen). Review of Resident R95's physician orders dated January 12, 2024, for supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula every shift for shortness of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility documentation, review of personnel files and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that agency nursing staff demonstrated competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs for three of three agency personnel files reviewed (Employees E3, E15 and E16). Findings include: Review of facility staffing schedules revealed that Employee E3, licensed nurse; Employee E15, licensed nurse; and Employee E16, nurse aide; worked at the facility on May 5, 2025, as agency nursing staff. Observation of morning medication pass on May 5, 2025, at 9:45 a.m. revealed that Employee E3, agency licensed nurse, made a medication error as well as failed to maintain appropriate infection control practices during medication administration. Continued observation of morning medication pass on May 5, 2025, revealed that Employee E15, agency licensed nurse, left the medication cart unlocked and unattended, next to the resident dining area, from 10:36 a.m. through 10:42 a.m. Review of personnel files for Employee E3,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled for four of four medication carts reviewed (2 North upper medication, 2 North low medication cart, 2 South back medication cart ) and maintain a system that allows for timely identification of narcotic diversion. Findings include: Review of facility policy, Pharmacy Services Policy and Procedure dated 2025, revealed, The Facility shall have a system to account for controlled medications' receipt and disposition in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation. Observation on May 5, 2025, at 10:03 a.m. of the 2 North upper medication cart, with Employee E3, agency licensed nurse, revealed that the number of blister pack medication cards was not documented during the shift-to-shift narcotic medication reconciliation process. Interview, at the time of the observation, Employee E3, agency licensed nurse, confirmed the above finding.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than five percent for two of four residents observed during medication administration (Residents R83 and R88). Findings include: The facility's medication error rate was 5.88% based on observation of 34 medication administration opportunities with two errors observed. Review of facility policy, Medication Administration Policy dated December 4, 2023, revealed, Medications must be administered in accordance with orders, including any required time frame. Review of Medication Administration Records (MARs) for Resident R83 revealed a physician's order, dated March 14, 2025, for aspart (rapid acting) insulin (medication used to lower blood sugar levels), inject 24 units subcutaneously (under the skin) before meals. Continued review revealed another order, dated April 4, 2025, for aspart insulin sliding scale (variable dosage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored and labeled in accordance with professional practice standards and failed to ensure that compartments for storage of controlled medications were permanently affixed within storage areas, for thee of five medication storage areas reviewed (2 North upper medication, 2 North low medication cart, 1 North low medication cart, first floor medication room.). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Medication Administration Policy dated December 4, 2023, revealed, The individual administering the medication must check the label to verify the right medication, right dosage, right time and right method of administration before giving the medication. Check the expiration date on the medication label. When opening a multi-dose container, place the date on the container. Continued review revealed, During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse. It may be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that personal foods were stored and labeled in accordance with food safety standards for one of two nursing units reviewed (2 North medication room). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Medication Storage Policy dated December 4, 2023, revealed, Employee or resident food should not be stored in the medication refrigerator. Review of facility policy, Outside Food undated, revealed, Resident and or person bringing in the food will be notified that perishable food will only be kept for 72 hours. Continued review revealed, Staff will monitor resident's room, unit pantry, and refrigeration units for food and beverage disposal. Observation on May 5, 2025, at 9:58 a.m. of the 2 North medication room, with Employee E3, agency licensed nurse, revealed that the refrigerator contained both resident medications as well as foods brought into the facility. Continued observation revealed several opened containers of foods; none of the containers had dates to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to insulin administration and hand hygiene during medication administration for two of three licensed nurses observed (Employee E3 and E20). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Medication Administration Policy dated December 4, 2023, revealed, The individual administering medications must verify the resident's identity before giving the resident his/her medications . The individual administering the medication must check the label to verify the right medication, right dosage, right time and right method of administration before giving the medication. Check the expiration date on the medication label. When opening a multi-dose container, place the date on the container. Continued review revealed, Staff shall follow established facility infection control procedures (e.g., hand washing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etc.) when these apply to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure equipment was maintained in safe and operating conditions related to the main kitchen and fire doors. Findings Include: An initial tour of the main kitchen was conducted on May 5, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. with Food Service Director, Employee E29. Observations and interview with Food Service Director, Employee E29, revealed the main kitchen is equipped with two steamers, four ovens, and one tilt skillet. Further interview and observation revealed one steamer, three ovens, and the tilt skillet are broken. Further observations during the initial tour of the main kitchen on May 5, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. revealed the stainless steel, industiral preparation table was noted to be on a slant. The table was observed to be holding other kitchen prep equipment such as cutting boards, food processor, and toaster oven. Food Service Director, Employee E29, confirmed the table was broken and needed to be replaced or fixed. Follow-up observations on May 8, 2025, at 12:00 p.m. in the main kitchen with Food Service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations of the physical environment of the dietary department, reviews of the pest control operators reports and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program so that the facility was pest free. Findings include: A group meeting held at 10:30 a.m., on July 25, 2024 revealed that residents were dissatisfied with the pest control program at the facility. The residents said that they have repeatedly reported to administration that they have a rodent problem in the building. The Residents R11, R126, R101, R77, R107, R93 and R61 indicated that the mice are entering the building through the air conditioning/heating units inside their bedrooms. Observations of the food and nutrition department on July 23 and 24, 2024 confirmed entry ways and easy access to the building for common household pests (mice, roaches, flies). The wood surrounding the air conditioning unitcontained voids/holes from water damage. Observations revealed obvious chewing and burrowing by rodents. Mice droppings throughout the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of clinical records, review of facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure residents receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents for three of 29 residents reviewed (Residents R51, R126, R446). Facility did not ensure to provide environment free of potential hazards related to unlocked housekeeping storage rooms on two units. (Unit One North and Two North ) Findings include: Review of facility policy Hazardous Areas , Devices and Equipment, revised July 2017, indicates A hazard is defined as anything in the environment that has the potential to cause injury or illness such as: Equipment and devices that are left unattended or are malfunctioning, Sharp objects that are accessible to vulnerable residents, Open areas or items that should be locked when not in use, Access to toxic chemicals, Disabled locks, latches or alarms. Review of facility policy Shaving the resident, revised February 2018, indicates to review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident, and if using a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of care and services, clinical record review, interviews with residents and staff and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that two of 29 residents reviewed maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for usual body weight, desirable body weight and electrolyte values. (Residents R113, R118) Findings include: Review of the policy titled Nutritional assessment dated [DATE] revealed that it was the dietitian's responsibility to comprehensively assess each resident and their individual nutrition needs. As part of the nutritional assessment the multidisciplinary team was responsible for identifying the following components: usual body weight, usual meal and snack intake, food preferences and dislikes and preferred portion sizes. Clinical record review revealed a comprehensive assessment MDS (an assessment of care needs) for Resident R113 dated February 24, 2024. This assessment indicated that this resident was cognitively intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of 29 residents received medications consistent with professional standards of practice through an on going communication and collaboration of care with the dialysis care center. (Resident R113) Findings include: Review of the policy titled administering medications dated August 2022 revealed that it was the responsibility of the licensed nurse to administer medications safely and timely to each resident. the policy also indicated that medications are to be administered in accordance with the physician's orders, including any required time frames. Clinical record review revealed a admission MDS (an assessment of care needs) dated February 24, 2024 for Resident R113. The assessment indicated that this resident had diagnoses of heart failure, end stage renal disease (kidney failure requiring a course of dialysis to filter waste products from the blood) and diabetes mellitus (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of clinical records, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of five percent or greater, for 11 out of 31 medications reviewed. Findings include: Review of physician order for Resident R545, dated July 22, 2024, revealed an order to administer Gabapentin Oral Capsule 300 mg one time a day. On July 24, 2024, 9:19 a.m., Employee E20, a Licensed Nurse was observed administering to Resident R545, Gabapentin Oral Capsule 600 milligrams (mg) one tablet, by mouth. Interview with licensed nurse, Employee E20 at the time of the observation confirmed that the administration of 600 mg and not 300 mg as ordered by the physician. On July 25, 2024, at 12:19 p.m.,Employee E21, a Licensed Nurse, was observed administering to Resident R39, the following medications by mouth: 1 Vitamin D3 Tablet (Cholecalciferol), give 2000 mg by mouth one time a day for immune support. Employee E21 gave 1000mg two tablets) 2 amLODIPine Besylate Tablet 10 MG, Give 10 mg by mouth one time a day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-29 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of policies and procedures, interviews with staff, observations of the meals served throughout the facility, interviews with residents, reviews of resident council meeting minutes and planned menus, it was determined that the facility failed to take in consideration food preferences of seven of seven resident reviewed. (Residents R113, R54, R106, R132, R110, R77 and R11) Finding include: Review of the policy titled nutritional assessment dated [DATE], revealed that it was the responsibility of the dietitian and the multidisciplinary team to complete a comprehensive assessment of each resident to identify the resident's usual routines, meal and snack patterns, along with food preferences and dislikes. Observations of the noon meal service on July 25 and 26, 2024 revealed several Residents R113, R54, R106, R132, R110, R77 and R11 that were asking for substitiute food items instead of the planned menu entre being served. A group meeting held at 10:30 a.m., on July 25, 2024 revealed that residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies and procedures, observations of the operations within the food and nutrition department and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional stadards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of the policy titled food prepartion and service dated October 2017 revealed that food preparation staff were responsible for adhearing to proper hygiene and sanitation practices to prevent the spread of foodborne illness. Review of the undated policy titled food safety requirements revealed that it was the policy of the facility to provide safe and sanitary storage, handling and consumption of foods and fluids. The policy indicated that the facility was responsible for ensuring the food service equipment and dish ware was not contaminated by poor personal hygiene and improper sanitation. Review of the dietary policy titled food receiving and storage dated October 2017…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policy as well as review of facility provided documentation, interview with staff, it was determined that facility did not maintain and implement a comprehensive program to monitor and prevent infections in the facility. Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Legionella Water Management Program,' revised July 2017, indicates that water management program includes identification of areas in the water system that could encourage the growth and spread of Legionella or other waterborne bacteria, including: 1) Storage tanks; 2) Water heaters; 3) Filters; 4) Aerators; 5) Showerheads and hoses; 6) Misters, atomizers, air washers and humidifiers; 7) Hot tubs; 8) Fountains; and Medical devices such as CPAP machines And specific measures used to control the introduction and/or spread of legionella (e.g., temperature, disinfectants); The control limits or parameters that are acceptable and that are monitored; A diagram of where control measures are applied; A system to monitor control limits and the effectiveness of control measures; A plan for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-29 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility provided documentation, review of policy, and interview of staff, it was determined facility did not ensure to designate one or more individual as the infection preventionist and therefore did not meet the requirement for professional and specialized training. Findings include: Review of facility policy surveillance for infections, revised September 2017, indicates that The Infection Preventionist will conduct ongoing surveillance for Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) and other epidemiologically significant infections that have substantial impact on potential resident outcome and that may require transmission-based precautions and other preventative interventions. A request for a copy of the approved Infection Preventionist specialized training in infection prevention and control certification was made to the nursing home director of nursing, employee E1 on July 26, 2024 at 1:00 p.m. Director of Nursing did not provide the documentation that the facility employed an Infection Preventionist who completed specialized training in infection prevention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation of personal property for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident R143). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Personal Property with a revision date on August 2022 states, Resident are permitted to retain and use personal possessions, including furniture and clothing, as space permits, unless doing so would infringe on the rights or health and safety of other residents. 2. Resident belongings are treated with respect by facility staff, regardless of perceived value. 6. The resident's personal belongings and clothing are inventoried and documented upon admission and updated as necessary. Review of Resident R143's closed record revealed the resident had an inventory sheet completed April 15, 2024 upon admission to the facility. The inventory had items listed on the bottom portion of the form labeled admission Inventory. The following items were listed on the record: one jacket, one shaving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy, clinical records, and interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation related to misappropriation of resident property and did not have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated for one of 29 residents reviewed. (Resident R70) Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Internal Investigation of Violations Checklist,' indicates that it is important to investigate internal allegations of misconduct in a thorough and consistent manner. Policy further indicates to consider providing training to the offender and to all employees, and consult outside counsel if necessary. Review of facility provided investigation report, dated April 30, 2024, revealed that Resident R70 with brief interview of mental status score (BIMS) of 14, informed facility of missing funds from personal bank account. Resident R70 was able to identify two employees, housekeeper, Employee E12, and activities aide, Employee E11, as alleged perpetrators. According to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents of Quality Assurance meeting attendance and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Infection Preventionist and Medical Director or their designee attended a quarterly Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) committee meetings for one of four quarters (February 2024 through June 2024). Findings Include: A review of QAPI committee meeting sign in-sheets revealed no sign in sheets for the month of February 2024, March 2024, April 2024, or June 2024. Further review of the QAPI binder revealed a sign in sheet for month of May 2024 that lacked an Infection Preventionist and Medical Director. Interview with the Director of Nursing, Employee E1 and the interim Nursing Home, Administrator Employee E2 on July 29, 2024 at 12:20 p.m. revealed there has not been an Infection Preventionist employed at the facility since February 2024. Further interview with Employee E1 and E2 revealed the Medical Director has been invited to the QAPI meetings but has not attended or picked a designee to attend since their time of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews with facility staff and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility did not initiate the grievance process for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R2). Findings include: Review of facility documents revealed that resident R2 reported an incident of alleged verbal abuse to administration. The incident occurred on May 9, 2024. The nature of the allegation was that the resident asked to change the TV channel and a nursing aide yelled at the resident. An interview was conducted with Nursing Home Administrator, Employee E1 on June 6, 2024, at 1:00 p.m. Employee E1 confirmed that he and the director of nursing met with the resident regarding her concern. The allegation of verbal abuse was reported to the State Survey Agency and that an investigation was initiated. Employee E1 acknowledged that the resident's complaint was not processed as a grievance. 28 Pa. Code 201.29(a)(d)(k) Resident rights
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, review of facility documentation, clinical record review and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an elopement incident and a transfer to the hospital as a result of a possible drug overdose were reported the the State Survey Agency for two of six residents reviewed (Resident R1 and Resident R2). Findings include: Review of facility, Abuse Policy revised April 20, 2023, revealed that Administrator or designee is responsible for operationalizing all policies and procedures that prohibit abuse and neglect. They are also required to report instances of suspected or actual abuse or neglect occurring within the facility. Review of the clinical record for Resident R1 revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for care after pelvic fracture from being struck by a motor vehicle. Further review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed a history of substance abuse. Review of nursing note by Licensed nurse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility was not maintaining an effective pest control program. Findings include: Interview with Resident R8 in room [ROOM NUMBER], on April 1, 2024, at 11:40 a.m. revealed that the resident had often seen mice in the facility. Interview with Resident R9 in room [ROOM NUMBER], on April 1, 2024, at 11:43 a.m. revealed that the resident had often seen mice in the facility, and the exterminator too. Interview with Resident R10 in room [ROOM NUMBER], on April 1, 2024, at 11:45 a.m. revealed that the resident saw mice in the facility in the past. Interview with Resident R11 in room [ROOM NUMBER], on April 1, 2024, at 11:50 a.m. revealed that the resident often had seen mice and roaches in the facility, the mice run from room to room. I stomped my foot and they don't even run away, just look at you. Interview with Resident R12 in room [ROOM NUMBER], on April 1, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. revealed that the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-09 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of XXX residents reviewed received psychiatric consultations as ordered by the physcian.(Resident Cl1) Findings include: Review of Resident Cl1's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted admitted on [DATE], with a history of delirium and confusion due to a diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy (a loss of brain function as a result of failure in the removal of toxins from the blood due to liver damage). Review of Resident Cl1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment of care needs) dated February 15, 2024, indicated that the resident had moderately impaired cognition. The assessment also indicated that Resident Cl1 was exhibiting behaviors of inattention and disorganized thinking. Review of Resident Cl1's Cl1's physician notes dated February 28, 2024 indicated that Resident Cl1 had increased anxiety and pacing behaviors. The resident had several elopment attempts from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-09 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing failed to effectively manage the facility related to to the proper discharge on one of three residents reviewed (Resident Cl1) and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings include: Review of the job description for the Nursing Home Administrator revealed, The Administrator is responsible for directing the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state and local standards governing long-term care facilities to ensure that the highest degree of quality resident care and services are delivered and maintained. He/she will ensure all personnel are treated fairly and consistent with company policy and applicable laws .Ensures that each resident received the necessary nursing, medical, and psychological services to attain and maintain the highest possible mental and physical functional status .Interprets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, review of clinical records, interview with staff and residents, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered in accordance with professional standards for two of five residents reviewed (Resident R1 and Resident R2). Findings include: Review of facility policy on administering medication with last revision date of August 2022 revealed that under policy statement: medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. Under policy interpretation and implementation: The Director of Nursing Services, supervises, and directs all personnel who administer medications and or have related functions. #4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders. Including any required time frame. #5. Medication administration times are determined by resident need and benefit, not staff convenience. Factors that are considered include: A. enhancing optimal therapeutic effect of the medication. B. preventing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, interview with staff, and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices during care for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of facility policy on Infection Prevention and Control Program with revision date of July 2022, under section Policy revealed that it is the policy of the facility to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. Under section Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines #2. The RN's (Registered Nurse) and LPN's (Licensed Practical Nurse) supervise direct care staff in daily activities to assure appropriate precautions and techniques are observed, assess the resident's isolation needs, initiate appropriate precautions in accordance with our established policies and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment on one of three nursing units observed (1 North unit). Findings include: Interview on October 10, 2023, at 1:39 p.m. Resident R1 stated that the facility does not keep any foods in the pantry on the 1 North unit and that he would like to have access to snacks due to his diabetes (ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of blood sugar levels). Observation on October 10, 2023, at 1:54 p.m. Employee E7, nurse aide, was in the 1 North pantry room preparing cups of ice for residents. Continued observation revealed that there were no foods, snacks or beverages readily available for residents. Further observation revealed that multiple cabinets and shelves were broken and unusable in the pantry room. Employee E7, nurse aide, confirmed that the cabinets and shelves were broken and unusable and that no foods were stored in the room. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders related to blood sugar monitoring for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Interview on October 10, 2023, at 8:50 a.m. Resident R1 stated that the facility does not effectively assist him with managing his diabetes (ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of blood sugar). Review of Resident R1's care plan, dated initiated July 30, 2020, revealed that the resident is at risk for hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) and hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) episodes related to diabetes. Interventions include to administer medications as ordered by the physician, monitor blood sugar as ordered by the physician and report to the physician any signs of hyperglycemia. Review of physician orders for Resident R1 revealed an order, dated September 1, 2023, for Novolin R insulin (regular insulin - medication used to lower blood sugar levels)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation of medications and assessments for two of six residents reviewed (Residents R5 and R6). Findings include: Review of Resident R5's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated September 7, 2023, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including diabetes (ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of blood sugar), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and surgical amputation of left leg below the knee. Review of Medication Administration Records (MARs) for Resident R5 revealed that on October 9, 2023, during the evening shift, the following medications and assessments were not documented: Assess for pain every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-03-19 · tag F0573 — patternLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide copies of medical records as requested in a timely manner and reasonable cost for one of one resident reviewed for medical record request (Resident R162). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Release of Information revised November 2009, revealed The resident may initiate a request to release such information contained in his/her records and charts to anyone he/she wishes. Such requests will be honored only upon the receipt of a written, signed, and dated request from the resident or representative (sponsor). A resident may obtain photocopies of his or her records by providing the facility with at least forty-eight (48) hour (excluding weekends and holidays) advance notice of such request. A fee may be charged for copying services. Review of facility documentation revealed medical record request dated October 13, 2025, request including HIPAA (Health insurance portability and accountability act) compliant authorization form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$23,624 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $8,965 — penalty dated 2024-02-05
- $14,659 — penalty dated 2024-02-05
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVENTURA HEALTH GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPP SENIOR HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/01/2018 |
| KASZIRER, MOISHE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 25% | since 12/01/2018 |
| JACOB, JOBY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/03/2025 |
| REDDING, SHANITA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/28/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $927K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395203. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.