No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aventura At Walton Hills

19859 Alexander Rd, Walton Hills, OH 44146 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (440) 439-4433 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (440) 439-4433 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2024Resident-funds citation (F0568)2 actual-harm citations1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
24197 Broadway Avenue
Pharmacy
23300 Broadway Ave · (440) 201-1187 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ALDI1.0 mi
 
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.8%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.0%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.4%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.6%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.5%25.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.4%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.9%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.3%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.4%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.0%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 51% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.94
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.17
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
48.5%
Total nursing turnover
75.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 77.2 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-01)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2022-11-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed prevent Resident #58 from developing an in-house pressure ulcer and failed to ensure timely identification, proper treatment and interventions were initiated to promote healing. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff completed accurate and comprehensive weekly skin assessments/checks as ordered. Actual Harm occurred on 12/04/24 when the facility failed to implement appropriate and effective interventions for Resident #58, who was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, was always incontinent of bladder, frequently incontinent of bowel, and required staff assistance for activities of daily living, to prevent the development of an in-house acquired unstageable (full-thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough or and/or eschar making the depth/stage undetermined) pressure ulcer to the left buttocks. This affected one resident (#58) of three residents reviewed for pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #54, who was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance from two persons for transfers was transferred safely via a mechanical (Hoyer) lift to prevent a fall with injury. Actual Harm occurred on 12/12/19 when Resident #54 sustained a fall from the Hoyer lift resulting in a laceration to her head requiring transport to the emergency room. This affected one resident (#54) of one resident review for accidents. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy, type two diabetes and unspecified intellectual disabilities. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance for activities of daily living including two person assistance for transfers. Review of the nurse's note authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify the guardian of Resident #77's elopement. This affected one resident (#77) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 79.Findings include:Review of Resident #77's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/07/24 and diagnoses including anxiety, chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes, cognitive communication deficit, Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia and dementia without behavioral disturbance. Resident #77's daughter was listed as his legal guardian.Review of a discharge, return-anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77's memory was intact, he did not wander and required partial to moderate assistance for ambulation using a wheelchair.Review of a progress note dated 02/15/26 at 3:00 P.M. and authored by Registered Nurse (RN) #316 revealed the following information: Resident #77 pushed on exit door, activating door alarm. Staff member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely develop care plans relative to elopement risk. This affected one resident (#77) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 79. Findings include:Review of Resident #77's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/07/24 and diagnoses including anxiety, chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes, cognitive communication deficit, Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia and dementia without behavioral disturbance. Resident #77's daughter was listed as his legal guardian.Review of a wander-risk evaluation dated 10/29/25 revealed Resident #77 was a low risk for wandering.Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 was cognitively intact, did not wander and required partial to moderate assistance with ambulation using a wheelchair.Review of a wander-risk evaluation dated 01/29/26 and completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #225 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the staff prepared food that was palatable with seasoning and had the ingredients to prepare the food according to the dietitian approved recipes. This affected 72 out of 75 residents who ate their meals in the facility. The facility identified three residents (#4, #9, #29) who received no food by mouth. The facility census was 75.Findings include:A review of Resident #38's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/20/24 with diagnoses including type II diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory failure, hearing loss, above the right knee amputation, major depression, diabetic peripheral angiopathy, anxiety, obesity, insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Resident #38's physician order dated 01/30/25 indicated a consistent carbohydrate/liberal diabetic diet, with regular consistency, and thin liquidsAn interview with Resident #38 at 2:40 P.M. revealed the food tasted bland and had no flavor and tended to repeat the same recipes over and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items were stored in a safe and clean manner to prevent cross contamination, exposure to air, and failed to ensure the kitchen work areas were clean and free of debris and grease buildup. This had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified three residents (#4, #9 and #29) who received no food by mouth. The facility census was 75.Findings include:Observation of kitchen on 09/29/25 at 8:15 A.M. with Facility [NAME] #117 and Dietary Manager #110 revealed multiple items that were uncovered and exposed to air or pests. The thickener used to puree foods was open and uncovered and placed next to kitchen mixer which was observed to have fruit flies around the container. New coffee cups and Styrofoam food containers were being stored in a cardboard box on a shelf under the coffee machine which sustained liquid damage and splatter from spilled coffee. The shelf under the tray line had old, stained parchment paper which had clean plates on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment. This affected six residents (#08, #24, #39, #53, #65 and #82) of 11 residents reviewed for environment and had the potential to affect all the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 75.Findings include:1. Interviews with residents on 09/29/25 between 10:30 A.M. and 2:45 P.M. revealed Resident #24 stated the hallways and residents' rooms are not kept clean. Resident #39 stated her room was not kept clean daily, and the furniture in her room was worn out, and the bedside table and over-the-bed table had chipped wood. Resident #65 stated the rooms were not cleaned daily, and the furniture was worn with chipped wood. Resident #82 stated her room was not cleaned or mopped daily, and the facility was generally dirty. Observations on 09/29/25 between 10:30 A.M. and 2:45 P.M. revealed the hallways in the facility had a buildup of dirt along the edges of the halls, had yellowed wax…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents could reach their call lights. This affected one resident (#37) of eleven residents reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility census was 75.Findings include:Record review of Resident #37 revealed he was admitted to the facility 4/10/25 and had diagnoses including hemiplegia, major depressive disorder, and end stage renal disease. His Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had mild or no cognitive impairment and he was dependent on staff assistance for chair-to-bed transfers and for mobility in his wheelchair.Observation of Resident #37 on 09/29/25 at 2:05 P.M. revealed he was in his room in a wheelchair in a reclined position with a Hoyer (mechanical lift) pad beneath him. The call light was tied to his bed rail and on the floor out of reach, roughly four feet from his wheelchair. Interview with Resident #37 at this time revealed he wanted assistance getting to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician orders were implemented in a timely manner for Resident #38 and Resident #43. This affected two residents (#38 and #43) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 75.Findings include:1. A review of Resident #38's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/20/24 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type II, neuropathy, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, hearing loss, above the knee amputation of the right knee, major depression disorder, diabetic angiopathy without gangrene, anxiety, asthma, epilepsy, and schizophrenia.A review of Resident #38's Medication Regimen Review form dated 05/19/25 revealed the pharmacist recommended the physician provide an order for a valproic acid level based on review of Resident #38's medication list. The most recent valproic acid level was obtained on 03/25/25. The Medication Regimen Review also indicated to increase…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control practices to prevent cross contamination of germs during Resident #42's incontinence care. This affected one resident (#42) out of three residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. The facility census was 75.Findings include: A review of Resident #42's clinical record revealed an admission date of 09/14/23 and re-admission date of 12/02/23 with diagnoses including breast cancer, lumbago with sciatica, depression, osteoarthritis of both knees, Alzheimer's disease, cervical spondylosis with myelopathy, right knee contracture, spinal fusion of lumbar region, atherosclerotic heart disease, high blood pressure, hearing loss, glaucoma with cataracts, high cholesterol, vitamin D deficiency, A review of Resident #42's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #42 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and was not on a toileting program.A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were maintained during medications administration, which included hand washing/hand hygiene. This affected three residents (#4, #20, and #71) out of six residents observed for medication administration and had the potential to affect 16 additional residents (#3, #5, #10, #22, #23, #24, #28, #30, #31, #35, #39, #41, #44, #46, #66, and #67) on Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #215's assignment. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 10/29/20. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease, type II diabetes mellitus, and vascular dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had intact cognition. Observation on 03/19/25 at 8:53 A.M. revealed LPN #215 began to prepare the medications for Resident #4 without performing hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were individualized for Resident #33. This affected one resident (#33) out of three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 10/22/24. Diagnoses included paraplegia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, neurogenic bowel, history of COVID-19, colostomy, and cannabis dependence. Review of Resident #33's care plan dated 10/23/24 revealed there was no care plan for the recent unstageable pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough (yellow, tan, gray, green or brown) and/or eschar (tan, brown or black) in the wound bed) acquired in house on 12/05/24. Interview on 03/25/25 at 2:33 P.M. with Regional Director of Clinical Operations (RDCO) #400 confirmed there was no care plan for the recent in house acquired unstageable pressure ulcer for Resident #33 and/or updated interventions. Review of the facility policy, Care Plans,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure weekly skin observations were accurately completed as ordered for Residents #33 and #72. This affected two residents (#33 and #72) out of three residents for wounds. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #33's medical records revealed an admission date of 10/22/24. Diagnoses included paraplegia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, neurogenic bowel, history of COVID-19, colostomy, and cannabis dependence. Review of Resident #33's physician orders for March 2025 revealed an order to cleanse the right lateral ankle with normal saline (NS) or wound cleanser, pat dry, apply collagen to the wound and cover with boarder gauze every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday night shift and as needed (PRN). Review of Resident #33's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administrative Record (TAR) for October 10/23/24 revealed wound treatment was current for Stage 3 pressure ulcer (full thickness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed enhanced barrier precautions during catheter care. This affected one (Resident #15) of three residents reviewed for catheters. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 10/22/24 with diagnoses including paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body) and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (condition where nervous system injury or disease affects the bladder). Review of the physician's orders for Resident #15 revealed an order dated 12/03/24 for catheter care every shift. He also had an order dated 01/13/25 for enhanced barrier precautions. Observation of catheter care to Resident #15 on 02/11/25 at 9:18 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #206 revealed he was on enhanced barrier precautions. There was a sign for enhanced barrier precautions on his door stating that all staff must wear gloves and gown when providing hygiene and care of urinary catheter. There was noted to be an isolation cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a respectful and dignified manner. This affected three residents (#31, #68, and #70) of six observed for dignified treatment. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #31's medical records revealed an admission date of 06/03/24. Diagnoses included developmental disorder, bladder dysfunction and Parkinson. Review of MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had impaired cognition. Resident #31 required maximum assistance with toileting, bathing and personal hygiene. Resident #31 had a urinary catheter for elimination. Review of Resident #31's physician orders for January 2025 revealed to keep foley bag covered with privacy bag. Observations on 01/13/25 from 11:16 A.M. to 11:20 A.M. revealed Resident #31's urinary drainage bag was visible from the doorway and did not have privacy cover in place. Resident #31 was not interviewable. Interview with Certified Nurse Aide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and family interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents and their responsible parties were included in the development and implementation of the plan of care. This affected one resident (Resident #11) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 71. Finding include: Review of Resident #11's medical records revealed an admission date of 10/22/24. Diagnoses included paraplegia and bladder dysfunction. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had intact cognition. Telephone interview on 01/13/25 at 10:33 A.M. with Resident #11's Power of Attorney (POA) revealed she had attempted multiple times to arrange a care planning conference to discuss Resident #11's needs, however no care planning conference had ever been scheduled. Interview on 01/13/25 at 3:03 P.M. with Social Services Designee (SSD) #332 revealed care planning conferences were to be done upon admission and then on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely address resident and family concerns. This affected two residents (#11 and #67) of four residents reviewed for concerns. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the facility's grievance log revealed no logged grievances for December 2024 or January 2025 to date. 1. Review of Resident #11's medical records revealed an admission date of 10/22/24. Diagnoses included paraplegia and bladder dysfunction. Resident #11's record indicated he had a chronic, indwelling suprapubic (surgically created opening in the abdomen in which a urinary catheter is inserted into to allow for continuous bladder drainage) catheter present upon admission. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had intact cognition. Resident #11 was dependent with toileting, and required maximum assistance with bathing and personal hygiene. Resident #11 had a urinary catheter for elimination. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of facility policy, and review of the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) Certification and Licensure System (CALS), the facility failed to timely report an allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse to the State Agency as required. This affected one resident (Resident #72) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of Resident #72's medical records revealed an admission date of 12/02/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's and failure to thrive. Review of MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 had impaired cognition. Resident #72 required maximum assistance with toileting, bathing, and personal hygiene tasks. Review of the ODH CALS website revealed an incident of alleged emotional/verbal abuse involving CNA #318's interactions with Resident #72 was reported to the State Agency on 01/13/25 at 12:08 P.M. Interview on 01/13/25 at 1:02 P.M. with Receptionist #278 revealed on 01/11/25 she had observed CNA #318 yelling at Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate urinary catheter care had been performed. This affected one Resident (#11) of three observed for catheter care. The facility identified five residents with indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical records revealed an admission date of 10/22/24. Diagnoses included paraplegia and bladder dysfunction. Resident #11's record indicated he had a chronic, indwelling suprapubic (surgically created opening in the abdomen in which a urinary catheter is inserted into to allow for continuous bladder drainage) catheter present upon admission. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had intact cognition. Resident #11 was dependent on staff for toileting, and required maximum assistance with bathing and personal hygiene tasks. Resident #11 had a urinary catheter for elimination. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review, police report review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent the exploitation of Resident #33 by an employee. This affected one (Resident #33) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 07/31/24. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the non-dominant left side, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), personality disorder, and mild cognitive impairment. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/05/24, revealed Resident #33 had intact cognition and was independent for bed mobility, transfers, and eating. Review of the plan of care dated 11/22/24 revealed Resident #33 had problematic behavior characterized by inappropriate sexual behavior including making inappropriate remarks and attempting to touch other residents and staff. Review of SRI #254363 with a creation date of 11/22/24 revealed on 11/21/24 at around 12:00 P.M. there was an incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #50's pressure ulcer wound care was completed as ordered. This finding affected one (Resident #50) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, generalized anxiety disorder and unspecified osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #50's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #50's admission Nursing Evaluation form dated 08/05//24 revealed the resident had bruising to the right antecubital, right buttock and left buttock. Review of Resident #50's Wound Observation form dated 08/06/24 revealed the resident had bilateral buttocks dermatitis first acquired 08/05/24. The resident was discharged from wound care. Review of Resident #50's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk form dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety when not returning from a leave of absence. This affected one Resident (#27) of three reviewed for safety hazards. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 03/01/24. Diagnoses included epilepsy, diabetes mellitus, Wernicke's encephalopathy, generalized muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, cognitive communication deficit, alcohol use, restlessness and agitation, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Medicare Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/07/24, revealed Resident #27 had intact cognition. Resident #27 was independent for bed mobility, ambulation, and transfers. Review of physician's order, dated 08/09/24, revealed Resident #27 may go on leave of absence (LOA) with supervision with medications unless contraindicated. Review of physician's orders for September 2024 revealed Resident #27 had orders for Empagliflozin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI), facility investigation interviews, police report and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #22 was free from suspected resident-to-resident sexual abuse by Resident #63. This affected one resident (#22) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 69. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 05/24/21. Diagnoses included adult failure to thrive, dementia, hearing loss, psychosis, and hypertension. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 was rarely or never understood. She was totally dependent on two people for toileting and hygiene and required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, transfers, and dressing. She displayed behavioral symptoms not directed toward others such as disrobing in public, scratching, or hitting herself and disruptive sounds daily. Review of the care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to complete wound care as ordered/care planned. This affected one resident (#58) of two observed for wound care. The facility identified seven residents (#2, #17, #27, #35, #45, #58, and #68) who required wound care. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of Resident #58's medical records revealed an admission date of 05/01/23. Diagnoses included stage four pressure ulcer of the sacrum (tailbone) and osteomyelitis (bone infection). Review of the care plan dated 06/20/23 (revised 08/22/23) revealed Resident #58 had impaired skin integrity with a stage four pressure ulcer to the sacrum. Interventions included perform wound care as ordered. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 was rarely understood and was admitted with a stage four pressure ulcer to the sacral area. Review of Resident #58's current physician orders for August 2023 revealed orders to cleanse the left lateral leg with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate urinary catheter care was provided. This affected one resident (#58) of one observed for urinary catheter care. The facility identified six residents (#17, #32, #44, #58, #67 and #68) with urinary catheters. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of Resident #58's medical records revealed an admission date of 05/01/23. Diagnoses included neuromuscular bladder, dementia and a sacral (tailbone) pressure ulcer. Review of the care plan dated 06/20/23 (revised 08/22/23) revealed Resident #58 had an indwelling urinary catheter. Interventions included to provide catheter care as ordered. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 was rarely understood, had a urinary catheter and was incontinent of bowel. Review of current physician orders for August 2023 revealed provide catheter care every shift and check placement of catheter tubing anchor every shift. Observation on 08/28/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure adequate Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids and medications) care. This affected two residents (#55 and #58) of three observed for PEG tube care. The facility identified five residents (#24, #37, #35, #55 and #58) with PEG tubes. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #58's medical records revealed an admission date of 05/01/23. Diagnoses included dysphasia (difficulty swallowing) and dementia. Review of the care plan dated 06/20/23 (revised 08/22/23) revealed Resident #58 was at risk for malnutrition related to dysphasia. Resident #58 relied on nutrition received via PEG tube. Interventions included provide tube feeding per orders and monitor skin integrity for changes. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 was rarely understood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-28 · tag F0568 — widespread
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident and/or responsible parties received quarterly statements of resident personal needs account activity as required. This affected four (Residents #24, #25, #33, and #49) of four residents reviewed for personal funds. This had the potential to affect 22 additional residents (Residents #1, #3, #6, #7, #8, #10, #13, #14, #18, #23, #26, #29, #32, #36, #37, #38, #47, #50, #53, #55, #56, and #58) who also had personal needs bank accounts at the facility. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the resident funds list provided by the facility during the annual survey beginning on 11/20/22 revealed 26 (Residents #1, #3, #6, #7, #8, #10, #13, #14, #18, #23, #24, #25 #26, #29, #32, #33, #36, #37, #38, #47, #49, #50, #53, #55, #56, and #58) had an account that was actively managed by the facility. Review of four (Residents #24, #25, #33, and #49) of the 26 personal funds accounts revealed no documented evidence was provided by the facility indicating the residents and/or responsible parties were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect 58 out of 60 residents receiving food from the facility. Two residents (Residents #2 and #4) out of 60 residents received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 60. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour conducted on 11/20/22 between 8:37 A.M. through 8:47 A.M. revealed Dietary Aide (DA) #500 was not wearing a hairnet. DA #500 stated that there were no hairnets available. In the walk-in refrigerator revealed ambrosia salad was portioned into souffle cups and not covered, labeled, or dated. Mashed potatoes and gravy were not labeled or dated. [NAME] # 212 verified the findings at 8:47 A.M. on 11/20/22. [NAME] #212 stated that the Dietary Manager is in the hospital and the department is short staffed today. A follow up visit to the kitchen on 11/21/22 at 9:32 A.M. revealed that DA #205 was still not wearing a hair restraint. DA #205 stated that she just took it off to wash dishes then went to her bookbag,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-28 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was reviewed and updated as necessary, and at least annually. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 60. Findings Include: Review of the facility assessment revealed the facility assessment was completed on 10/09/17 and reviewed on 11/21/17, 11/24/18, 02/06/19, 06/24/19, 07/30/19, 11/25/19, 03/23/20, 05/18/20, and 06/14/21. Review of the facility assessment revealed it had not been reviewed or updated since 06/14/21. Interview with the Administrator on 11/22/22 at 3:40 P.M. verified the above findings.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and accessible for Resident #6 and Resident #11. This affected two of two residents reviewed for call light placement. The facility census was 60. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 07/07/18. Diagnoses included epilepsy, diabetes, and a history of traumatic brain injury. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/09/22, revealed the resident had intact cognition. Resident #6 was independent for bed mobility, transfers, walking, locomotion, dressing, eating, and toilet use. Resident required supervision for personal hygiene. Observation of the resident on 11/20/22 at 9:46 A.M. revealed his call light not within reach. It was hung over the call light box over the roommate's bed which was several feet away from the Resident. Review of care plans dated 07/09/18 with a revision date of 02/20/20 revealed Resident #6 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-28 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to honor resident preferences regarding getting out of bed to participate in activities and or socialize, and going back to bed. This affected one resident, Resident #1, of one resident reviewed for choices. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Record review for resident #1 revealed an admission date of 02/14/17. Diagnosis included cerebral palsy and muscle weakness. Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact). Resident #1 required extensive assistance of two plus persons for bed mobility, activity did not occur for transfers or locomotion, and Resident #1 had no concerns with mood or behaviors. Record review of the care plan dated 05/01/22 revealed Resident #1 preferred activities included playing bingo and interacting with staff. Interventions included to provide Resident #1 with a program of activities that was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-28 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Pre admission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR) forms were completed timely as required and addressed all applicable mental health and developmental disability diagnoses. This affected one of one resident reviewed for PASRR compliance. The facility census was 60. Findings Include: Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma , hypertension and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on a hospital exemption form which in turn required the completion of the PASRR form within thirty days of admission. Review of the PASRR in the medical record revealed Resident #54 PASRR was completed on 11/07/22. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #209 confirmed a PASRR should have been completed on 11/04/22 and was not completed timely as required.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure timely nail care was provided for Resident #6, Resident #26, and Resident #42. This affected three of three residents reviewed for providing assistance with nail care. The facility census was 60. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 07/07/18. Diagnoses included epilepsy, diabetes, and a history of traumatic brain injury. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/09/22, revealed the resident had intact cognition. The Resident required supervision for personal hygiene. Observation on 11/20/22 at 9:22 A.M. and 09:46 A.M. revealed Resident #6's nails were long, jagged, and split. Interview on 11/20/22 at 9:46 A.M. Resident #6 said he usually cut his own nails but had lost his clippers. Interview on 11/20/22 at 12:20 P.M. Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #262 verified Resident #6's nails needed to be cut. ADON #262 stated she would check with the Resident's physician to see if he would be allowed to have his own…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide ongoing activities to meet the interest and needs for one resident, Resident #1, of one resident reviewed for activities. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Record review for resident #1 revealed an admission date of 02/14/17. Diagnosis included cerebral palsy and muscle weakness. Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact). Resident #1 required extensive assistance of two plus persons for bed mobility, activity did not occur for transfers or locomotion, and Resident #1 had no concerns with mood or behaviors. Record review of the care plan dated 05/01/22 revealed 1:1 visits from activities staff to promote socialization. Resident #1 preferred activities included playing bingo and interacting with staff. Interventions included to provide Resident #1 with a program of activities that was of interest and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an effective bowel regimen was implemented for Resident #52 after the resident did not have a bowel movement for nine days and failed to ensure Resident #52's left elbow cushion was available and applied at all times per the physician orders. This affected one resident (Resident #52) of one resident reviewed for bowel monitoring and interventions for pressure wounds. The facility census was 60. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, epilepsy, and dysphagia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with two staff for activities of daily living except eating was total with one staff and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #52 had an unhealed pressure ulcer, one stage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the physicians order for splints was followed for residents #3 and #9. This affected two of two residents reviewed for splint placement. The facility census was 60. Findings Include: 1. Diagnoses included aphasia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and contracture. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/08/22, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident was totally dependent for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The resident was independent for eating. Review of physician orders for 11/22 revealed an order dated 09/22/22 for Resident #3 to wear a right resting hand splint daily as tolerated. Review of the plan of care dated 08/30/16 and last revised 04/25/22 revealed Resident #3 was to use a hand/wrist/elbow splint for right upper extremity contracture prevention. Interventions included to wear right elbow extension splint daily as tolerated. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) or Treatment Administration Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide physician ordered/dietary recommended nutritional supplements for one resident, Resident #29, of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #29 had an admitting date of 08/27/20. Diagnosis included hyperthyroidism, diverticulitis, and gastro esophogeal reflux disorder (GERD). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision with eating. Resident #29 had weight loss not prescribed. Record review of Resident #29's weight record revealed on 06/03/22 Resident #29's recorded weight was 110 pounds. On 11/15/22 Resident #29's recorded weight was 97.8 pounds (down 11.9 %). Review of the care plan dated 07/11/22 revealed Resident #29 significant weight loss over 30 days noted 9/15/22. Interventions included to provide diet per order and provide supplements per order. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, observation, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #266 Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine was maintained in functional order. The facility identified one resident (#266) who utilized a CPAP machine. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Resident #266 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fibromyalgia, sleep apnea, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the admission Nursing Evaluation assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #266 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time and required two-person physical assist to total dependence for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the 48-Hour baseline care plan dated 11/14/22 revealed Resident #266 had ineffective breathing related to asthma and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of the care plan revealed interventions that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents request and preferences for meals were honored. This affected two (Resident #40 and #41) of 58 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Residents #2 and #4 received no food by mouth. The facility census was 60. Findings Include: 1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, chronic kidney disease obesity, and other intestinal obstruction unspecified as to partial versus complete obstruction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time and required two-person physical assist for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #40 had an order dated 07/31/22, for a cardiac prudent diet, regular texture, and thin consistency. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices during wound care provided for one Resident, Resident #52, of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Record review for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 12/17/21. Diagnosis included pressure ulcer of sacral region stage four, personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), and muscle weakness. Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 (Resident #52 was unable to complete the assessment). Resident #52 had an unhealed pressure ulcer, one stage three pressure ulcer not present on admission. Record review of the physician orders for Resident #52 for November 2022 revealed orders for the left elbow: Cleanse area with normal saline, pat dry, pack with calcium alginate and cover with an abdominal pad and wrap with kerlix. Change daily and as needed. Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent contamination and/or food borne illness. This affected all 63 of 63 residents who received meal trays from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#24) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Initial kitchen tour on 12/15/19 at 8:08 A.M. with [NAME] #13 revealed gray/black debris, crumbs, and scuff marks covering floor in main kitchen, and additional storage rooms adjacent to the kitchen. Additional observations revealed a clear sticky substance, and a cup on the floor behind the juice machine. A follow up observation of the kitchen on 12/16/19 at 10:30 A.M. revealed a can opener laying on a metal cart with a crusty, orange, dried substance on the blade. The bottom shelf of the cart had food particles, a dried crusty brown material, and dried white drop marks on it. The side of the pallet warmer next to the metal cart had dried, whitish drip marks covering the entire surface. Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were served at a palatable and smooth consistency for safe swallowing. This affected eleven residents (#3, #7, #24, #26, #28, #30, #37, #39, #41, #53 and #216) who were prescribed a pureed diet of 63 residents who consumed meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings include: On 12/16/19 at 10:28 A.M. observation of the preparation of pureed foods with [NAME] # 74 revealed the rice was taking a long time to pureed. [NAME] #74 revealed he thought he had to cook it more to puree it better. The surveyor requested to taste the rice once it was ready to be served. On 12/16/19 at 12:12 P.M. a test tray of the lunch meal revealed the pureed rice was gritty and the pureed meat had small pieces of gristle in it. The mixtures were not smooth and not of the proper consistency. [NAME] #85 verified the consistency of the pureed rice and pureed meat. Review of resident diet list revealed eleven residents, Resident #3, #7, #24, #26, #28, #30, #37, #39, #41, #53 and #216 who were prescribed a pureed diet.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #62 and Resident #214 had accurate advance directive orders and information in place throughout their medical records. This affected two residents (#62 and #214) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the most recent annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was rarely understood and required extensive assistance for activities of daily living. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #62 revealed an order dated 11/23/19 for a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) code status (meaning only comfort measures would be initiated in the event of a medical emergency). Review of the social service progress noted dated 11/23/19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a seat belt device was properly assessed as a restraint for Resident #25 and failed to ensure the device was the least restrictive device for the resident. This affected one resident (#25) of two residents reviewed for seat belt devices. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia, unspecified dementia with behavioral disorder, hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (slight paralysis) following non traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting the left side. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/05/19 revealed Resident #25 was cognitively impaired and required total dependence with two plus person physical assist for transfers and toileting, and total dependence with one person physical assist for locomotion on and off the unit. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order, dated 12/10/19 for the use of seat belt when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the physician's diet order for Resident #59 was followed. This affected one resident (#59) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including morbid obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, major depressive order and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Resident # 59's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and was independent for mobility and eating. Review of a nutritional assessment, dated 11/25/19 revealed the resident just had bariatric surgery. The bariatric dietitian and facility registered dietitian agreed Resident #59 should start a low concentrated sweet (LCS) regular (soft foods), thin liquids diet and with small portions. Review of the physician's orders, dated 12/13/19 revealed an order for a small portions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-19 for 4 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVENTURA HEALTH GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.5+0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AVENTURA AT WALTON HILLS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 06/30/2022
EOM HEALTH CARE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 06/30/2022
KASZIRER, MOISHEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/30/2022
SCHARF, MORDECHAIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/30/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-22.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$917K
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 18%Medicare 1%Other / private 81%

This home reported $917K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$312per resident / day
operating cost
$9,470per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$254per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365705. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next