No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aventura At Creekside

45 North Scott Street, Carbondale, PA 18407 · For profit - Corporation · 81 certified beds · (570) 282-1099 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$136,785 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (73) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $136,785 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-31)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
10 Dundaff St · (570) 282-1404 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
19 Dundaff St · (570) 282-1080 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
IGA0.3 mi
25 Dundaff St · (570) 282-5800 · Call to confirm hours
Park
98-4 Veterans Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.0%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.8%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms18.1%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.3%0.2%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.7%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.1%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.8%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.0%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table41.3%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.4%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.3%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.4%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.3%9.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.841.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.891.181.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 106 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.1%CMS range 36.6–54.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 7.4–13.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified46.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.5–13.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.851.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.10
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.60
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
56.0%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 76.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-03)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2025-07-31)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

73 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, a review of select facility policy, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a manner to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served under sanitary conditions and free of pest infestation. The presence of live and dead cockroaches in food preparation and storage areas created a high risk of contamination of food, utensils, and food-contact surfaces with disease-causing organisms. This failure created an increased potential for foodborne illness and placed 80 out of 80 residents in a situation of Immediate Jeopardy to their health and safety. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-07-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, the facility's abuse prohibition policy, and select investigative reports and interviews with staff and residents it was determined the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident 49) out of 19 residents sampled was free from physical abuse perpetrated by a facility staff member This failure to prevent, identify, and respond appropriately to physical abuse placed Resident 49 and all other residents in the facility at risk for further harm, resulting in Immediate Jeopardy.Findings include: A review of a facility policy entitled Abuse Policy, last reviewed July 8, 2024, revealed it is the policy of the facility that acts of physical, verbal, phycological and financial abuse directed against residents are absolutely prohibited. Eash resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, mistreatment, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of property. Further under the section titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, investigative reports, staff interviews, and facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to consistently ensure adequate supervision, staff training, and implementation of appropriate individualized interventions to prevent accidents for three residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) out of 10 sampled resulting in harm including skin ters, lacerations and a head injury requiring staples. Findings include: A review of clinical records revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include Picks Disease (condition that affects the brain leading to inappropriate behavior and language difficulties), psychotic disorder with hallucinations (a mental health condition that may include hearing things, false beliefs based on reality, and difficulty sustaining activities), and muscle atrophy (loss of muscle tissue, resulting in decreased strength) and a history of falling. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS a federally mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who lacked the ability to make medical decisions had an identified authorized representative and failed to ensure documentation of advance directives or evidence the resident was offered information regarding the right to formulate an advance directive. The facility failed to ensure medical treatment decisions were made by an appropriate legally authorized decision maker for three of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 13, 27, and 51).Findings included: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included rheumatoid arthritis (chronic autoimmune disorder where the immune system mistakenly attacks joint linings, causing pain, inflammation, swelling, and potential deformity) and bipolar disorder (chronic mental health condition characterized by alternating periods of depression and elevated mood). A review of Resident 13's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, Resident Council meeting minutes, grievance documentation provided by the facility, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to make reasonable efforts to address concerns raised by the Resident Council and failed to keep residents informed regarding the status and outcome of identified concerns. The facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and timely follow-up regarding issues presented by eight of eight residents attending a Resident Council group meeting (Residents 8, 14, 22, 33, 35, 54, 55, and 68).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Grievance Policy, last reviewed September 25, 2025, indicated residents, families, and their representatives have the right to voice grievances regarding care and treatment, staff behavior, or other concerns related to their stay. The policy indicated the designated grievance official is responsible for following up on concerns and grievances reported by residents or resident representatives. A review of a grievance dated January 9, 2026, submitted by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a clean and sanitary environment, including resident care equipment, for two of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 9 and 28).Findings include: Observations in Resident 9's room on April 1, 2026, at 11:00 AM and 1:30 PM revealed dried tube feeding residue in multiple locations within the resident's room. Specifically, dried nutritional formula (liquid nutrition administered through a feeding tube when a resident cannot eat by mouth) was observed on the base of the resident's tube feeding pole, on the fall mat positioned on the floor to the right side of the bed, and on the privacy curtain located to the right side of the bed. Observations conducted on April 1, 2026, at 1:00 PM revealed Resident 28's Broda chair (a specialized, highly adjustable medical chair used to assist with positioning, pressure injury prevention, and mobility for individuals with complex care needs) was positioned in the resident's room unoccupied and was not maintained in a clean…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, resident observation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to identify the use of a physical restraint and failed to implement facility policy regarding the use of restraints for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 10).Findings include: Clinical record review revealed Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a neurological disorder that begins in early childhood and permanently affects muscle coordination, body movement, and posture). A review of Resident 10's annual Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated March 1, 2026, revealed that Resident 10 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information; a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy, employee personnel files and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement procedures to fully screen three employees out of five to ensure they were eligible for employment in a long term nursing care facility. (Employees 1, 2, and 3).Findings include: A review of the facility's Resident Abuse policy last reviewed by the facility on September 25, 2025, revealed the requirement for screening potential employees to determine their appropriateness in working with individuals with specific conditions and needs; including obtaining references from previous and current employers. Review of employee personnel files revealed the following: Employee 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse): Hired on February 26, 2026. The application listed previous employers, but there was no documentation showing the facility had contacted any former employer to fully screen the individual to ensure the individual was eligible for employment in a long term care nursing facility. Employee 2 (Registered Nurse): Hired on February 20,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for three of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 10, Resident 11, and Resident 23).Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility RAI User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing the MDS dated [DATE], requires the assessment accurately reflects the resident's status. A registered nurse conducts or coordinates each assessment with the appropriate participation of health professionals, and the assessment process includes direct observation, as well as communication with the resident and direct care staff on all shifts. A clinical record review revealed Resident 10 was admitted to the facility May 18, 2011, with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (brain disorder that appears in infancy or early childhood and permanently affects body movement and muscle coordination). The annual Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented consistently and accurately reflected resident-centered measures to meet each resident's assessed needs for two of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 10 and 11). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, last reviewed September 25, 2025, revealed a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs are developed and implemented for each resident. The policy further revealed that assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. A clinical record review revealed Resident 10 was admitted to the facility May 18, 2011, with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of personnel records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure nursing services met professional standards of quality as required by the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, by failing to verify Licensed Practical Nurses possessed the required education, training, and demonstrated competency for the administration of an intravenous (IV) medication via peripheral inserted central venous catheter (PICC) for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 5).Findings include: A review of Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, Department of State, State Board of Nursing, S21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) indicates the LPN functions as a member of the health care team and administers medications and therapeutic treatments in accordance with established standards of safe nursing practice. Section 21.145(b) IV therapy curriculum requirements indicate an LPN may perform IV therapy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by failing to ensure licensed nurses accurately administered medication in accordance with physician orders for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 20). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications last reviewed by the facility on September 25, 2025, revealed that medications are administered as prescribed in a safe, timely manner. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, and information is verified prior to administering medication including vital signs (measurements of basic body functions such as blood pressure, pulse, temperature, and breathing), are verified prior to administering medications when parameters are ordered. A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided according to physician orders, including implementation of ordered parameters and nonpharmacological interventions, for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Interagency Task Force, Executive Summary Draft Final Report May 6, 2021, for Pain Management Best Practices the development of an effective pain treatment plan after proper evaluation to establish a diagnosis with measurable outcomes that focus on improvements including quality of life (QOL), improved functionality, and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Achieving excellence in acute and chronic pain care depends on the following: An emphasis on an individualized patient-centered approach for diagnosis and treatment of pain is essential to establishing a therapeutic alliance between patient and clinician. Acute pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 60 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the attending physician acted upon and documented a clinical rationale regarding consultant pharmacist identified medication regimen irregularities for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes significant changes in mood, energy, and ability to function, including episodes of depression and mania, which is a period of abnormally elevated mood or irritability). A review of the November 2025 consultant pharmacist Medication Regimen Review (MRR) (a monthly evaluation of a resident's medications conducted by a licensed pharmacist to identify potential medication concerns such as unnecessary medications, excessive doses, or risk of side effects) revealed the pharmacist identified the resident's order for Mirtazapine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free from the use of an unnecessary antibiotic for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 8).Findings Include:A review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive condition involving decline in memory, thinking ability, and reasoning beyond normal aging) and muscle weakness. A review of the facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship, last reviewed by the facility on September 25, 2025, indicated antibiotics are prescribed only when there is sufficient clinical evidence of an active infection. The policy further indicated prescribers are expected to provide complete antibiotic orders including the medication name, dose, duration of treatment, and the clinical indication (medical reason) for use. The facility utilized the McGeer's Criteria Checklist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, observations of the food and nutrition services department, interviews with facility staff, and review of pest control records, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of insects/pests, specifically cockroaches.Findings include: A review of the facility's Pest Control Policy last updated July 18, 2025, indicated the facility shall maintain an effective pest control program. The facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure the building is kept free of insects and rodents. Contracted outside pest control services are provided. Windows are always screened. Only approved FDA and EPA' insecticides and rodenticides are permitted in the facility and all such supplies are stored in areas away from food storage areas. Garbage and trash are not permitted to accumulate and are removed from the facility daily. Maintenance services assist, when appropriate and necessary, in providing pest control services. During observation of the kitchen on August 25, 2025, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of select facility policies, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions to prevent potential contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the dietary department.Findings included: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). A review of facility policies entitled Environment and Food Storage last reviewed by the facility on July 17, 2025, indicated all preparation areas, food service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the State Survey Agency within 24 hours of the incident and failed to submit completed investigation findings within five (5) working days, for two of four abuse allegations reviewed (Residents 8 and 9).Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled Abuse Policy, last reviewed July 17, 2025, revealed it is the policy of the facility that acts of physical, verbal, psychological, and financial abuse directed against residents are absolutely prohibited. Each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, mistreatment, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of property. Under the section titled Investigation and Reporting, the policy states the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), or designee shall notify the Department of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, the facility's abuse prohibition policy and information provided by the facility it was determined the facility failed to promptly conduct a thorough investigation to rule out abuse and implement corrective action and submit the results of the completed investigation to the State Survey Agency within five working days of the incident as evidenced by two of 4 residents reviewed (Resident 9 and 8).Findings include: A review of the facility's Abuse Policy that was last reviewed by the facility on July 17, 2025, indicated the Administrator/designee was responsible for operationalizing all policies and procedures that prohibit abuse and neglect and are required to report instances of suspected or actual abuse or neglect occurring within the facility. Abuse coordinators are the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON)/designee of the facility. They shall coordinate all investigations ensuring resident safety, and report the findings to the regulatory agencies, as required.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was administered in accordance with physician's orders for three of 20 residents reviewed (Residents 13, 79, and 85).Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, last reviewed by the facility on July 17, 2025, revealed it is the facility's policy to provide oxygen therapy to residents upon order of the physician. The policy indicated it is the responsibility of the licensed nurse to initiate and monitor the administration of oxygen per physician's orders. Oxygen therapy is a medical treatment in which supplemental oxygen is administered to a resident to maintain adequate oxygen levels in the blood. Oxygen is typically delivered by a nasal cannula, which is a lightweight tube that splits into two prongs placed into the nostrils. The flow rate, measured in liters per minute (LPM), is determined by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to adhere to acceptable storage and labeling for multi-dose medications in one of two medication carts observed (Lilac Hall).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage last reviewed by the facility July 17,2025, indicated that multi-use medication vials/bottles that have been opened or accessed (e.g. seal broken) are to be labeled with the date they were opened to ensure proper tracking for expiration purposes. An observation of the medication cart located on Lilac hall unit on July 30, 2025, at 8:22 AM, in the presence of Employee 8 (Licensed Practical Nurse) of the medication stored in the medication cart, revealed one (1) multi-dose insulin pen of Insulin Degludec (a long acting insulin medication used to lower blood sugar) and one (1) multi-dose pens of Insulin Glargine (a long acting insulin medication used to lower blood sugar) that had been opened and available for resident use, but not dated when initially opened.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, select investigative reports, and employee job descriptions and staff interview it was determined the facility's administration failed to effectively use its resources to promote resident safety and maintain the highest practicable physical and mental functioning of residents in the facility by failing to prevent the physical abuse of one resident (Resident 49) out of 5 sampled residents. Findings include: A review of the clinical record for Resident 49 revealed that the facility failed to immediately remove Employee 3,Nurse Aide (NA), an employee alleged to have physically abused a resident, from resident contact. Despite the allegation, Employee 3 (NA) remained in the facility with access to residents while the allegation was unresolved. This failure to implement immediate protective measures placed Resident 49 and all residents in danger and resulted in the Immediate Jeopardy cited at F600. Further review revealed the facility failed to fulfill mandatory reporting obligations for additional abuse allegations:The facility did not report an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility the facility did not identify and respond to significant unplanned weight loss for one of 20 sampled residents . (Resident 9).Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects movement often causing tremors, muscle stiffness and balance problems) A clinical record review revealed Resident 9 weighed 133.5lbs on March 12, 2025. The clinical record revealed the resident weighed 111lbs on April 18, 2025, indicating a significant weight loss of 16.9% over 37 days. Meal intake records documented the resident's consumption was variable, ranging from 25% to 100% of meals offered. Review of a dietary note dated April 20, 2025, at 09:18AM (two days after the weight loss was documented), indicated the resident had an unplanned significant weight loss confirmed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, medication count records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nursing staff consistently follow established procedures for verifying and documenting the count of controlled substances at shift change on two of two medication carts observed.Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled Controlled Substances last reviewed July 17, 2025, revealed it is the expectation of nursing staff to count controlled medication inventory at the end of each shift. The policy further revealed the nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty make the count together and document and report any discrepancies to the director of nursing services. A review of the facility Narcotic Card Count from the green nursing unit medication cart revealed the following: July 22, 2025, the night shift on coming nurse failed to sign that the narcotic count was completed and correct. July 25, 2025, the day shift on coming nurse failed to sign that the narcotic count was completed and correct. July 26, 2025, the day shift on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — pattern
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement its established smoking policy to ensure resident safety and regulatory compliance. Specifically, the facility failed to post smoking policies in a conspicuous and legible manner, ensure required smoking safety equipment was available in the designated smoking area for 12 residents who smoke, and assess one cognitively intact resident (Resident 1) who requested to smoke for safe smoking practices out of 6 residents sampled. These failures created a potential for fire hazards and compromised resident safety. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident smoking policy and procedure, no review date available revealed, to ensure compliance with regulatory guidelines and safety protocols, the facility prohibits smoking except for in specifically designed areas. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Resident Smoking Policy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the discharge process honored the resident's preferences and goals and failed to demonstrate that the discharge was appropriate and necessary, for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include, Wernicke's Encephalopathy (an acute inflammatory hemorrhagic encephalopathy caused by thiamine deficiency, often associated with chronic alcoholism or malnutrition, characterized by loss of muscle coordination, visual disturbances such as diplopia, and confusion), alcohol-induced psychotic disorder, alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver without ascites, and nicotine dependence. Documentation indicated the resident was cognitively intact. While it was noted that the resident had a legal guardian, the facility was unable to produce documentation confirming guardianship status during the survey. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident billing record review, clinical record review, facility document review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide advance written notice of a per diem (daily) room rate increase for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for billing notification of charges (Resident 1). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident was admitted to the facility June 15, 2022, with diagnosis including, but not limited to, diabetes. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment (Minimum Data Set - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated January 5, 2025 revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13 (brief interview for mental status, a tool to assess the residents attention, orientation and ability to register and recall new information, a score of 13-15 indicates intact cognition). Documentation indicated the resident was his own responsible party, with his sister listed as an emergency and HIPAA contact (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act federal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation of the main kitchen and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness for 78 of 78 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). A tour of the kitchen was conducted with Employee 2 Dietary Manager, on October 1, 2024, at approximately 8:15 AM, that revealed the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure therapeutic devices to provide support and maintain proper positioning were applied for one two of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 48). Findings include: A review of Resident 48's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included contracture (a permanent stiffening of the muscles, tendons, ligaments, skin, and other tissues surrounding a joint that limits its range of motion) to the right and left ankle and contracture to the right and left elbow. Further review of the resident's clinical record revealed the resident was receiving restorative nursing and was to have right and left ankle plantar flexion contracture boots (a type of boot that can help with contractures, a condition that limits the ability to bend the foot and ankle downward) on in the morning and off at night. Also, the resident was to have [NAME] elbow splints (soft…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly assess and evaluate bowel and bladder function and implement individualized approaches to restore normal bowel and bladder function to the extent possible for four out of 19 sampled residents (Resident 20, 48, 3 and 22). Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Urinary Incontinence last reviewed July 8, 2024, revealed it is the policy of the facility to identify, assess, and provide the appropriate treatment and services to achieve or maintain as much normal urinary function as possible. A three day bladder diary will be completed for every resident upon admission, readmission, and as needed to determine if the resident requires a toileting plan or a every two hour check and change program. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (a group of neurological…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the pharmacist conducted medication regimen reviews at least monthly for two residents out of five sampled (Resident 42 and 54 ). Findings include: A review of Resident 42's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia (the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). A review of Resident 42's clinical record conducted at the time of the survey ending October 4, 2024, revealed no evidence that the pharmacist had conducted drug regimen reviews at least once a month between December 2023 and March 2024. A review Resident 54's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included Picks Disease (A specific type of dementia that affects a person's ability to speak and be understood), and Alzheimer's disease (a brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's planned cycle menus, observations, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to follow planned menus for 4 of 4residents requiring a pureed diet. Findings included: A review of the planned menu for October 1, 2024, revealed the lunch meal consisted of a barbecue cheeseburger, lettuce, tomato, a pickle spear, confetti coleslaw, french fries, and an oatmeal raisin cookie. Further review of an extension menu for October 1, 2024, for pureed (a method for turning solid foods into a smooth, creamy, or paste-like consistency) diets revealed residents on a pureed diet would receive a pureed barbecue cheeseburger, pureed mixed vegetable salad, mashed potatoes, and a pureed sugar cookie. Observation of the lunch meal service on October 1, 2024, at approximately 11:55 AM revealed there were no pickles, pureed marinated mixed vegetables, or pureed sugar cookies on the tray line as indicated on the menu. Further observations of the lunch meal service on October 1, 2024, revealed Resident 15, 33, 34, and 53 meal tickets revealed they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of test tray results and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to serve foods at safe and palatable temperatures for 1 out of 5 residents. Findings include: According to the federal regulation 483.60(i)-(2) Food safety requirements - the definition of Danger Zone, found under the Definitions section, is food temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit and below 135 degrees Fahrenheit that allow rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness. Review of the facility meal service time schedule revealed that the scheduled lunch time for dining room cart one was 12:20 PM and dining room cart two was 12:25 PM. Observation of the lunch meal tray line on October 1, 2024, at 11:55 AM, revealed dining room cart one left the kitchen at 12:35 PM and dining room cart two left the kitchen at 12:48 PM. Observations on the nursing unit at approximately 1:15 PM revealed the staff were pushing a cart of meal trays out of the dining room and on to the nursing unit. The trays on that cart started to be delivered to residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide food that accommodated residents' preferences for four residents of 9 residents reviewed (Resident 8, 60, 58, and 49). Findings include: An observation of lunch meal tray line on October 1, 2024, at 11:55 AM revealed the following concerns were identified: Resident 8's meal ticket indicated the resident wanted pasta salad on his tray for lunch. The kitchen staff did not have pasta salad available for the resident and he did not receive pasta salad as requested. Resident 60's meal ticket indicated the resident wanted pasta salad on his tray for lunch. The kitchen staff did not have pasta salad available for the resident and he did not receive pasta salad as requested. Resident 58's meal ticket indicated the resident wanted fruit cocktail on his tray for lunch. The kitchen staff did not have fruit cocktail available for the resident and he did not receive fruit cocktail as requested. Resident 49's meal ticket indicated the resident wanted a barbecue cheeseburger on his tray for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate systematically organized, readily accessible and secured resident medical records. Findings include: Observations on October 1, 2024, at 10:00 AM and again at 2:00 PM revealed a copier room in the front lobby with the door unlocked and open. The room contained multiple resident medical records. The records were not secure and being stored in a location where non-medical staff can enter and access these confidential medical records. Observations on October 2, 2024, at 11:00 AM revealed a copier room in the front lobby with the door unlocked and open. The room contained multiple resident medical records. The records were not secure and being stored in a location where non-medical staff can enter and access these confidential medical records. Observations on October 3, 2024, at approximately 9:15 AM revealed an unlocked shed outside of the facility. The shed had a box of papers that contained resident medical records sitting on the floor. The records were not secure and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policies and the facility's infection control tracking log, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain and implement a comprehensive program to monitor and prevent infections in the facility, including protocols and provisions for Enhanced barrier precautions and their implementation for 5 of five residents observed (Residents 42, 22, 48, 15, and 24). Findings include: A review of the facility's current enhanced barrier precautions policy dated as reviewed by the facility March 2024, revealed that it is the policy of this facility for PPE should be stored near residents' room and accessible to staff. Near the exit or outside the room is acceptable. For residents for whom EBP are indicated EBP is employed when performing high contact resident care activities A review of MEMO FROM THE Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Quality, Safety & Oversight Group, Ref: QSO-24-08-NH, CDC, Centers for disease control, dated March 20, 2024 regarding,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment was in safe operating condition in the facility's storage area. Findings include: A tour of the facility's storage area on October 3, 2024, at approximately 9:15 AM revealed two sheds that stored resident equipment. Dirt and debris were observed on the floor of the sheds. Mattresses were noted to be sitting directly on the shed floor. Dirt and dust were noted on the resident mattresses. There were pails for bed side commodes sitting on the floor of the shed. One pail was noted to have a dried white and brown substance inside it. Bed bolsters were uncovered and lying on the floor of the shed. There were boxes of air mattresses sitting directly on the dirty floor. Wheelchairs were noted to have dirty wheel and dust on them. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on October 3, 2024, at 9:20 AM revealed NHA was unable to provide any information as to why the residents' items were stored in poor condition and confirmed the facility failed to ensure that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on select facility policy, observations of the food and nutrition services department, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Pest Control last reviewed July 8, 2024, indicated the facility shall maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the building is kept free of insects and rodents. Observation of the food and nutrition services department on October 1, 2024, at approximately 8:15 AM revealed small flies (which resembled a fruit fly) flying around the juice machine. A review of a pest control contract initiated on June 17, 2024, indicated the pest company will treat for roaches, ants, mice and rats, and common spiders. Further it was indicated the company would provide monthly services to the facility. It was not indicated in the contract that the company would provide services for flies. A review of pest control invoices dated June 18, 2024, July 25, 2024, August 28, 2024, September 12, 2024, and September 20, 2024, revealed the company…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment that promotes each resident's quality of life and assures that each resident is treated with dignity by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, as evidenced by experiences reported by five of five residents sampled (Residents 4, 16, 14, 2, and 70). Findings include: During a resident group interview with alert and oriented residents on October 2, 2024, at 10:00 AM, the residents in attendance expressed concerns regarding the long wait times for staff to provide assistance with their care when requested/needed. All five residents (Residents 4, 16, 14, 2, and 70) in attendance stated that it often takes longer than 30 minutes for staff to answer their call lights. The residents stated that often when they have to wait longer than 30 minutes they end up soiling themselves and having to sit in a soiled brief waiting for staff to come take care of them. The residents in attendance stated that they have brought this concern up to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean and safe resident environment. Findings include: An observation on October 1, 2024, at approximately 10:52 AM of the main dinning room revealed debris and food particles on the floor. The floor was noted to be sticky. Dirty place setting were still on the table from the breakfast meal service. A resident breakfast tray was still sitting on a table in the dining room. An observation on October 1, 2024, at 2:02 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed a hole in the wall in the residents' bathroom covered with plaster. The floor in the resident's bathroom was also noted to have debris and dirt near the hole. Observations on October 3, 2024, at approximately 8:40 AM revealed the main dining room had debris and food particles on the floor. Further dried sticky spills were noted on the floor. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on October 4, 2024, at approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop person-centered care plans that included individual behavioral management for one resident and smoking for two residents out of 18 sampled (Residents 56, 58 and 60). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include depression. A review of nursing progress notes beginning in September 2024 revealed Resident 56 was exhibiting an increase in behaviors, particularly after his wife, who is also a resident in the facility, would be early in the evening pushing resident back to his room and asking staff to put Resident 56 to bed. Resident 56 does not like to go to bed early and becomes frustrated and agitated. These incidents and Resident 56's personal preferences for bedtimes were not addressed on the resident's care plan reviewed during the survey ending October 5, 2024. A review of the clinical record revealed Resident 58 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized discharge plan for one of 18 residents sampled (Resident 47). Findings Include: A review of facility policy titled Discharge Summary and Plan last reviewed July 2024 revealed that every resident will be evaluated for his or her discharge needs, the discharge plan will be reevaluated based on changes in the residents needs or condition, and residents will be asked about their interest in returning to the community. A review of the clinical record of Resident 47 revealed admission to the facility on July 14, 2020, with diagnoses including bipolar disorder. An annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS- standardized assessment process conducted at periodic intervals to plan resident care) dated July 3, 2024, revealed the resident had a BIMS (brief interview to aid in detecting cognitive impairment) score of 15, indicating that his cognition was intact. Review of Resident 47's comprehensive care plan revealed a focus area dated December 26, 2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by failing to demonstrate that licensed nurses fully evaluated a resident's status after an unwitnessed fall for one resident (Resident 8) out of 19 residents reviewed. Findings included: According to the Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, Department of State, Chapter 21 State Board of Nursing Subsection 21.11 (a) The register nurse assesses human responses and plans, implements and evaluates nursing care for individuals or families for whom the nurse is responsible. In carrying out this responsibility, the nurse performs all of following functions: (4) Carries out nursing care actions which promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals (6)(b) The registered nurse is fully responsible for all actions as a licensed nurse and is accountable to clients for the quality of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical and select facility policy, information submitted by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident who sustained repeated falls effective fall interventions to prevent the resident from falling for one of the 19 sampled residents (Resident 10). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Falls and Fall Risks, managing last reviewed by the facility on July8, 2024, indicated that the facility will identify interventions related to the residents' specific risks and causes to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. Review of clinical records for Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Schizophrenia (a mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels and behaves) Anxiety (a mental condition that causes a felling of worry, nervousness or unease) and hypertension (High blood pressure). Resident 10 has a documented history of falls, as noted in facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain respiratory equipment in a manner to promote optimal functioning for one resident out of 19 sampled residents (Resident 48). Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Nebulizer Therapy last reviewed on July 8, 2024, revealed to care for the nebulizer equipment the staff will clean the equipment after each use, disassemble parts after each treatment, rinse the nebulizer cup and mouthpiece with water, shake off excessive water, and air dry on an absorbent towel. A review of Resident 48's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors). Further review of the resident's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated January 29, 2024 and discontinued on August 19, 2024, a nebulizer (a small machine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain prior to the administration of a narcotic pain medication prescribed on an as needed basis for one resident (Resident 24) of 19 residents reviewed. Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include neuropathy ( a nerve condition that can cause a range of symptoms, including pain, numbness, tingling, swelling, or muscle weakness) and hypertension (high blood pressure). The resident had a current physician order initially dated September 10, 2024, for oxycodone ( a narcotic pain medication) 15 mg (milligram) tablet give one tablet by mouth, every eight hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. A review of the resident's September 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that staff administered the pain medication 29 times for the month of September. Of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility documentation review, policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable accurate accounting of controlled drugs when acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and or administering to identify possible diversion for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 76). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Discharge Medications, last reviewed July 2024, revealed The nursing staff shall forward completed drug disposition records to medical records. The complete list of the resident's medications shall also be provided to the resident upon discharge. Review of Resident 76's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes. Review of Resident 76's clinical record revealed they were discharged home from the facility on July 25, 2024. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to show adequate monitoring of behaviors and potential adverse consequences of psychoactive drug use and failed to consistently attempt non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of psychoactive drugs for one resident out of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 24). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include neuropathy ( a nerve condition that can cause a range of symptoms, including pain, numbness, tingling, swelling, or muscle weakness) and hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of physician orders revealed an order initially dated September 9, 2024, the resident had an order for Ativan 1mg (psychotropic medication) give one tablet by mouth every eight hours as needed for anxiety. The physician failed to include a stop date for the as needed psychotropic drug. A review of a medication administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, select facility policy review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement and adhere to procedures to ensure acceptable storage and use by dates for multi-dose medications in the medication storage room. Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Expiration Dating of Multidose Vials last reviewed by the facility July 8, 2024, revealed the expiration/beyond use date on the medication label must be checked prior to administering. When opening a multi-use container, the nurse's initials, and the date opened shall be recorded on the container. Observation of the medication room on October 3, 2024, at 9:35 AM, in the presence of Employee 1 (registered nurse), of medication stored in the medication refrigerator, revealed a multi-dose vial of Lidocaine Hydrochloride Injection USP (a local anesthetic agent) as well as a vial of Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (a solution used for Tuberculosis skin test) that had been opened, and available for use, but was not dated. Interview with Employee 1 at the time of the observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's plan of correction from the survey ending October 4, 2024, the outcome of the activities of the facility's quality assurance committee, a review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to effectively identify ongoing deficient practices related to unnecessary psychotropic medication. Findings include: As a result of the deficiencies cited under the requirements related to the unnecessary administration of psychotropic anti-anxiety drugs during the survey of October 4, 2024, the facility developed a plan of correction to serve as their allegation of compliance, which included a quality assurance monitoring component to ensure that solutions were sustained. This corrective plan was to be completed and functional by November 11, 2024. However, during the survey ending November 26, 2024, continuing deficient facility practice was identified with these same requirements. According to the facility's plan of correction for the deficiency cited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide care consistent with a resident's advanced directive and honor the resident's requests for future treatment for one resident out of four sampled (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia and hypertension. An admission minimum data set assessment (Minimum Data Set - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated April 7, 2024 revealed the resident to be severly cognitively impaired with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) is a tool to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents in long-term care facilities) score of 00( 0 to 7 indicates sever cognitive impairment) and required maximum assistance of staff for activities of daily living. An nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] at 6:20 PM did not indicate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and grievances lodged with the facility and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive services to maintain hearing ability for one of four residents sampled (Resident 1). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia and hypertension. An admission minimum data set assessment (Minimum Data Set - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated April 7, 2024, revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) is a tool to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents in long-term care facilities) score of 00 (0 to 7 indicates severe cognitive impairment) and required maximum assistance of staff for activities of daily living. An admission nursing assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness, in the dietary department and the resident unit food storage area. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). During a tour of the unit resident pantry area in the presence of the food service manager on May 16, 2024, at 11:30 a.m., observation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-16 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and a review of documentation provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a facility wide assessment that accurately reflected the personnel and specific resources presently available and to identify those that are necessary to care for its current resident population. Findings include: There was no facility assessment available for review at the time of the survey ending July 22, 2024. Following conclusion of the survey, the Nursing Home Administrator provided a facility assessment electronically dated as created and reviewed July 23, 2024, which indicated that the assessment would be next reviewed August 16, 2024, at the next QAPI meeting to determine the specific and unique needs of its resident population and the available and accessible resources to meet these needs on a daily basis and during emergent situations. The facility provided a facility assessment tool to the survey team electronically after the survey ended on July 23, 2024. There was no documentation on the form that identified and addressed the ongoing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of grievances filed with the facility and the minutes from Residents' Council meetings and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment that promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' requests for assistance, including experiences reported by three out of the 10 residents sampled (Residents 11, 17, and 50). Findings include: A review of resident council meeting minutes dated February 22, 2024, revealed that residents voiced concerns of waiting 35 - 40 minutes for staff to answer their call bells. The meeting minutes indicated that residents in attendance also indicated that there are not enough nurse aides on the floor to provide timely care to residents. A grievance form filed on behalf of a resident dated March 22, 2024, revealed that the resident had been waiting for nursing staff to assist him to the restroom, but staff did not respond timely. After waiting for a response, the resident's family member went to find staff assistance and observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct meal service in a manner respectful of each resident's personal dignity for two residents observed during meals (Residents 61 and 68), failed to maintain a respectful environment as evidenced by observation of staff conduct and behaviors and as reported by two residents (Resident 50 and 17) and failed to ensure that resident maintained a dignified personal appearance for two of the 10 residents sampled (Residents 29 and 66). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of an initial Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated April 18, 2024 revealed that Resident 29 is moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of 12 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping services to maintain a clean and orderly environment in three of the three nursing halls. Findings include: During a facility tour on May 16, 2024, an observation of the resident activity room at 11:11 AM revealed crumbs, food, and paper debris on the floor. An observation in the hallway outside the activity room at 11:12 AM revealed two three-inch clumps of hair on the floor. During another observation at 5:06 PM, the clumps of hair were still in the hallway outside the activity room. An observation of the nursing station at 11:14 AM revealed a brown substance splattered on the handrail and on the wall above the handrail. A buildup of dirt and debris was observed on the surface of the handrail extending along the nursing station. Multiple dried tan liquid stains were observed on the wall across from the nursing station. An observation of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] at 11:18 AM revealed used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review clinical record, the facility's plan of correction from the survey ending May 16, 2024, observations and the outcome of the activities of the facility's quality assurance committee it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a quality assurance plan, which was able to identify, and correct ongoing quality deficiencies related to providing a safe, clean and homelike environment. Findings included: The facility developed a plan of correction that included that all areas identified were cleaned or repaired as needed and a walk thru was performed on the remaining areas to identify any similar concerns. Any area identified were cleaned/repaired as appropriate. A new system would be placed into effect with the Department Heads. Each Department Head would be assigned areas to monitor on a weekly basis. The days and times of these Ambassador Rounds would be random, assuring the chances for compliance. Any issues identified during these rounds, would be discussed during stand-up or stand-down meetings. Housekeeping and Maintenance staff were educated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records and select incident reports, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to demonstrate that a registered nurse promptly assessed a resident displaying possible signs and symptoms of a potential change in condition for one resident (Resident 38) out of 15 sampled residents sampled. Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the following types of information should be made and maintained in a patient's EHR (electronic health record) to support the ability of the health care team to ensure informed decisions and high-quality care in the continuity of patient care: • Assessments • Clinical problems • Communications with other health care professionals regarding the patient • Communication with and education of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to consistently and accurately monitor resident weights to timely identify changes in nutritional parameters for two residents out of 15 sampled (Residents 51 and 47). Findings included: Review of facility policy entitled Weight Policy and Procedure Facility Guidelines, provided by the facility on May 16, 2024, indicated that monthly weights would be documented in the resident's electronic medical record and that nursing needs to ensure completion of weekly weights. Discontinuation of weekly weights should occur once stabilization has been determined by the Dietitian and Interdisciplinary Team. A progress note by the Dietitian needs to reflect the stabilization and return to monthly weights. Weekly weights should not go on for months at a time unless truly clinically indicated. Weight accuracy issues require problem solving. Dietitians need to drive the re-weight process and re-weights…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete clinical records, according to professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that a resident's clinical record included details related to injuries sustained post incidents with changes in medical status for one out of 15 sampled residents (Resident 38). Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association Principles for Nursing Documentation, nurses document their work and outcomes and provide an integrated, real-time method of informing the health care team about the patient status. Timely documentation of the following types of information should be made and maintained in a patient record to support the ability of the health care team to ensure informed decisions and high-quality care in the continuity of patient care: Assessments, Clinical problems, Communications with other health care professionals regarding the patient, Communication with and education of the patient, family, and the patient's designated support person and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-13 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews and a review of employee credentials and current staffing of the facility's food and nutrition services department it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide qualified staff to provide oversight of the food and nutrition services department. Findings include: During a tour of the food and nutrition services department on March 13, 2024, at approximately 10:00 a.m., the facility's designated Dietary Manager stated that she started working at the facility three days prior to this survey and her responsibilities included oversight of food preparation, service and storage of food. The Dietary Manager, stated that presently she did not possess the regulatory required qualifications for this position, which was confirmed during review of the employee's personnel file. During an interview on March 13, 2024 at 1 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that there was no qualified dietary manager in the facility from January 30, 2024 through March 4, 2024, when the current Dietary Manager came to the facility from a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of the facility's planned written menus, menu extensions, and select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow planned menus, failed to ensure that the facility's dietitian periodically updated the planned menus to reflect variety, the preferences of the current resident population and nutritional adequacy and failed to assure consistent availability of food to serve the emergency menu in the event of an emergency. Findings included: A review of the current facility census at the time of the survey on March 13, 2024, revealed 71 residents were currently residing in the facility. Review of the facility's Week 3 lunch menu for Wednesday March 13, 2024, revealed that the planned menu included barbecued chicken (4 oz), mashed sweet potatoes (1/2 cup), cauliflower (1/2 cup), dinner roll, chilled peaches (1/2 cup), apple juice (4 oz), 2% milk (4 oz) and coffee (8 oz). The Week 3 lunch meal, Renal diet extension, revealed baked chicken (3 oz) no BBQ sauce, Mashed sweet potatoes (1/2 cup), cauliflower (1/2/cup),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adaptive dining equipment as required by one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a current physician's order dated February 13, 2024, for the use an adaptive lip plate (dishes with built up rims and ridges to allow the elderly, seniors or disabled to catch the food on your fork or spoon) and lidded cup for all meals. Observation of the lunch meal on March 13, 2024, at approximately 12 p.m. revealed that the above resident, with physician orders for the adaptive lip plates, was served his lunch meal on a regular plate and cup and did not receive the lip plates as ordered. Interview on March 13, 2024, at approximately 1 PM with the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the adaptive lip plate and lidded cup were not being utilized at the time of the meal observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review clinical records, the facility's plan of correction from the survey ending March 13, 2024, and the outcome of the activities of the facility's quality assurance committee it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a quality assurance plan, which was able to identify and correct ongoing quality deficiencies related to adherence to written menus and menu planning to meet the needs and preferences of residents Findings include: During the survey the March 13, 2024, deficient facility practice was identified related to the facility's failure to serve meals as planned by the facility. The facility developed a plan of correction that included a new facility process Administrator will educate Dining Room Manager on substitutions or menu changes requiring approval by Registered Dietitian (RD) before being implemented. The Dining Room Manager would educate Dietary Cooks on substitution logs and the process of making substitutions and the Dining Room Manger would educate Dietary Cooks on the requirement of following planned facility menus as written.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department and the resident pantry. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive department responsible for developing and executing federal laws related to food). A tour of the facility's kitchen conducted on January 24, 2024, at approximately 10 AM, in the presence of the Director of Nursing, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping services to maintain a clean and orderly environment and resident care equipment in one resident room out of 34 (room [ROOM NUMBER]) and as observed for one resident on the one resident unit in the facility. Findings include: Observations of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed that just inside the door there blankets were observed laying on the floor. The overbed table was soiled with food debris. Dirty resident laundry, and tissues were observed on the floor and a plastic medicine cup containing a moist substance on the floor under the center resident bed in the room. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s resident bathroom revealed moist towels hanging on the assist bars of the toilet. A soiled brief was observed on the floor next to the garbage can. The trash can in the bathroom was overflowing with garbage. A bedpan was placed on the top of the toilet assist/grab bar. Observation in the hallway of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff and resident interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential accident hazards on one of one nursing unit Findings include: Observations conducted during a tour of resident rooms on January 24, 2024, at 11:25 AM revealed in occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER] two bottles of Nystatin powder (antifungal powder), one container of calmoseptine ointment, and one bottle of antifungal cream were observed on Resident 1's nightstand. Additional observations of the resident rooms on January 24, 2024, at 12:35 PM revealed that the above noted creams and powders remained on the nightstand in Resident 1's room. Resident 1 was present in the room at the time of the observation and the resident care supplies and personal care products were within the resident's reach. An observation of occupied room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed two containers of hydrogel wound ointment and one bottle of nystatin powder on Resident 2's nightstand within reach of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0917 — isolated
    Make sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide each resident with a clean mattress on one bed out of 81 available in the facility (Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]). Findings revealed: Observations of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on January 24, 2024, at 11:25 AM revealed that the resident bed located by the door was stripped of its bottom fitted sheet. Further observation of the exposed mattress on the bed revealed that there were distinct dirty shoe footprints visible on top of the mattress. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on January 24, 2024, at approximately 2:30 PM confirmed the facility is to provide a clean and sanitary mattress for each resident. 28 Pa. Code (e)(2.1) Management

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident billing record review, clinical record review, facility document review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide advance written of a private pay rate increase for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for billing notification of charges (Resident 18).Findings include: Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including frequent falls and pneumonia (a lung infection caused by various germs such as bacteria, viruses, or fungi). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated July 21, 2025, indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (a tool used to assess a resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information; a score of 13-15 indicates intact cognition). Documentation further indicated the resident was his own responsible party, with his daughter listed as the emergency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-10-04 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for one out of the 19 residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents 30). The findings include: A review of Resident 30's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on June 5, 2024, and returned to the facility on June 12, 2024. There was no documented evidence that the facility had communicated specific information to the receiving health care provider for the residents transferred and expected to return, including advance directive information, special instructions, or precautions for ongoing care, as appropriate, or comprehensive care plan goals to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. During an interview on October 4, 2024, at approximately 1:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) and Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that there was no evidence that the necessary information was communicated to the receiving health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-10-04 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a written notice regarding emergency transfer to the hospital was provided to the resident and resident's responsible party for one resident out of 19 residents sampled (Resident 30) Findings include: A review of Resident 30's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on June 5, 2024, and returned to the facility on June 12, 2024. Clinical record review revealed no documented evidence written notices had been provided to this resident and their responsible parties regarding each transfer that included the required contents: reason for the transfer, effective date of the transfer, location to which the resident was transferred to, contact and address information for the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and, if applicable, information for the agency responsible for the protection and advocacy of individuals with developmental disabilities. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on October 4, 2024 at approximately 1:30 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-10-04 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence of written information of the facility's bed hold policy was provided upon transfer to the hospital of one resident out of 19 residents sampled (Resident 30). Findings include: A review of Resident 30's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on June 5, 2024, and returned to the facility on June 12, 2024. There was no documented evidence that the resident and/or their responsible parties or legal representatives were provided written information about the facility's bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) at the time of transfer. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on October 4, 2024, at approximately 1:30 PM confirmed the facility is unable to provide documented evidence of the provision of written notice of the facility's bed hold policy upon hospital transfer. 28 Pa Code 201.18 (e)(1) Management 28 Pa Code 201.29 (b) Resident rights

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$136,785 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $136,785 — penalty dated 2025-07-31
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-13 for 61 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVENTURA HEALTH GROUP — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CPP SENIOR HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/01/2018
KASZIRER, MOISHEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL25%since 12/01/2018
OREHEK, ALLENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/21/2025
PANICK, STEVENIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/21/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$443K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 8%Other / private 15%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $443K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$320per resident / day
operating cost
$9,738per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$300per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395984. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next