Linwood Village Nursing & Retirement Apts

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 36.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 67 beds and averages 48.6 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.22 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were completed within 48 hours of admission for 3 (#47, 54, and #161) of 15 sampled residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Care Plans- Baseline policy, revised March 2022, read in part, The baseline care plan includes instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care and must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident including, but not limited to the following: a. Initial goals based on admission orders and discussion with the resident/representative; b. Physician orders; c. Dietary orders; d. Therapy services; e. Social Services; and f. PASARR recommendation, if applicable. 1. An undated admission Record, showed Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no baseline care plan completed within 48 hours…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0851 — pattern
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the direct care staffing hours on the Quality of Care report were accurately reported. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Quality of Care (QOC) Reporting policy, read in part, This policy establishes a structured approach to tracking, reporting, and improving Quality of Care in SNF's, (Skilled nursing facility) ensuring compliance with CMS (Centers for Medicaid/Medicare) regulations, PDPM (payment driven patient module) documentation standards, and Quality Reporting Programs (QRP). Review of the Quality of Care Report for February, March, and April 2025, showed the following days were below the state required minimum of 2.9%: a. 02/02/25 = census 57, total direct care hours were 161.78= 2.8%, b. 02/09/25 = census 60, total direct care hours were 159.06= 2.6%, c. 02/15/25 = census 60, total direct care hours were 156.77=2.6%, d. 02/16/25 = census 60, total direct care hours were 155.53=2.5%, e. 02/22/25 = census 60, total direct care hours were 150.29=2.5%, f.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's DNR was valid for 1 (#212) of 15 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Advance Directives policy, revised [DATE], read in part, It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate advance directives .Advance Directive is a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney .Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care' a document that delegates authority to a legal representative to make health care decisions in case the individual delegating that authority subsequently becomes incapacitated .Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)- indicates that, in case of respiratory or cardiac failure, the resident, legal guardian, health care proxy, or representative has directed that no cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for 1 (#162) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Abuse,Neglect and Exploitation, dated 01/01/25, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect.The facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protection from physical and psychosocial harm. An initial OSDH Incident Report Form, for the incident date 02/07/25 Part B, read in part, [Resident #162] told the shower aids, late Friday afternoon, that in the night [they] had asked the aide for ice water and [they] threw a cup of water in [their] face. No injuries were noted. [Resident #162] has been a resident since 12/27/24 on skilled services. [Resident #162] had a slip and fall accident in November 2024 which has left [them] with partial paralysis.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for an allegation of abuse for 1(#162) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Abuse,Neglect and Exploitation, dated 01/01/25, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect.The facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protection from physical and psychosocial harm. An initial OSDH Incident Report Form, for the incident on 02/07/25 Part B, read in part, Resident #162] told the shower aids, late Friday afternoon, that in the night [Resident #162] had asked the aide for ice water and [Resident #162] threw a cup of water in [CNA #1] face. No injuries were noted. [Resident #162] has been a resident since 12/27/24 on skilled services. [Resident #162] had a slip and fall accident in November 2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dented cans, and opened bottles were removed from circulation in the dry storage. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility and ate from the kitchen. Findings: On 05/20/25 at 9:53 a.m., two 2.6 pound cans of hot dog chili sauce, and a can of tuna were observed to have dents along the seals. A plastic bottle of red food dye had torn foil covering the opening, leaving the bottle open to air. The date of receival written on the cans was 02/25. A policy Food Receiving and Storage, revised November 2022, read in part, Dry foods and goods are handled and stored in a manner that maintains the integrity of the packaging until they are ready to use. On 05/20/25 at 10:03 a.m., the DM stated the staff had dropped the chili cans, so the dietician told them they could serve the chili since they knew when the damage occurred. The DM stated he did not notice the can of tuna was bent or that the foil did not secure the bottle of food coloring. On 05/23/25 at 11:20 a.m., the dietician stated if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a water management plan to prevent waterborne pathogens had been implemented. The administrator reported 55 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Water Management Program, implemented 09/08/23, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to establish water management plans for reducing the risk of Legionellosis and other opportunistic pathogens in the facility's water systems based on nationally accepted standards .Documentation of all the activities related to the water management program shall be maintained in the water management program binder for a minimum of three years. On 05/23/25 at 10:31 a.m., the DON, regional administrator, and maintenance director were unable to provide documentation of any measures to prevent growth of Legionella. The maintenance director stated they did not really know about Legionella prevention.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure abuse training on hire was conducted for 1 (CNA #2) of 3 staff members files who's employee files reviewed. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The employee file for CNA #2 showed a hire date of 01/28/25. There was no abuse training on hire located in the employee file. On 05/23/25 at 9:40 a.m., the regional administrator stated the BOM had pulled the file and CNA #2 had not completed the actual training in the computer software system used. They stated staff was given fourteen days to complete the training's and CNA #2 never turned it in.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-23 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to act upon grievances presented during resident council meetings or provide rationale as to why concerns could not be met. The Administrator identified 49 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Resident Council Meeting policy, dated 01/02/24, documented the facility shall act upon concerns, make attempts to accommodate, and communicate their decisions to the council. Resident Council minutes, dated 11/30/23, documented concerns with nurses yelling down the hall, medications were administrated late, call lights in the morning not being answered while food was being delivered, residents not being assisted timely, hamburgers were dry, not enough vegetables, and resident items were missing. Resident Council minutes, dated 12/28/23, documented continued problems with medications, food, and missing items. There was no documentation concerns were acted upon or a response was provided to the council. On 02/22/24 at 1:57 p.m., a resident meeting was conducted with six residents in attendance. Residents stated staff don't…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised for three (#34, 40, and #32) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The Administrator identified 49 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Fall Prevention Program policy, dated 01/02/24, documented the plan of care would be revised as needed. 1. Resident #34 had diagnoses which included dementia. A Care Plan for falls, was last updated 01/09/24. Progress Notes, dated 02/07/24 and 02/10/24, documented the resident fell. It documented on 02/07/24 Resident #34 sustained a right clavicle fracture. It documented no injuries sustained from fall on 02/10/24. Risk Management notes, dated 02/07/24 and 02/10/24 documented Resident #34 returned from the hospital on [DATE] with no treatment recommended. It documented a medication adjustment was completed related to fall on 02/10/24. The care plan did not reflect any changes related to falls. On 02/23/24 at 10:02 a.m., the DON stated staff should be revising the care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SKYBLUE HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK