Colonial Manor Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 46.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 53.2 residents a day — about 44% occupied, or roughly 67 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-07-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On [DATE], an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to assess, monitor, and intervene for a change in condition for:1. Resident #8 who reported chest pain on [DATE] at 7:46 a.m. A progress note showed vital signs were taken, but no other action was documented, and2. Resident #7 who was reported by RN #1 to be slumped over the table in the dining room on [DATE] during the noon meal. The note showed Resident #7 was removed from the dining room and taken to their room. No other actions were documented.On [DATE] at 12:06 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation.On [DATE] at 12:45 p.m., the DON and administrator were notified of the IJ situation and provided the IJ template.On [DATE] at 11:41 a.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part,Plan of Removal: IJ for Failure to Assess, Monitor [and] InterveneCorrective Actions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a quarterly assessment for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for quarterly assessments.The administrator identified 52 residents resided in the facility. Findings:An undated policy titled MDS 3.0 Completion showed the facility was to complete quarterly comprehensive assessments no greater than 92 days from the resident's last quarterly assessment.A quarterly assessment for Resident #2, dated 11/18/25, showed the resident had diagnoses which included parkinsonism and diabetes mellitus. A comprehensive assessment list for Resident #2 showed a quarterly assessment was to be completed by 02/18/26 and was in progress.On 03/05/26 at 7:55 a.m., the MDS coordinator stated Resident #2's quarterly assessment was due on 02/18/26 and should have been completed.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered care plan for a contracture was developed for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care plans.The DON identified two residents with contractures resided in the facility. Findings:On 03/04/26 at 9:53 a.m., Resident #1's left leg was observed to be contracted. Their left leg was bent at the knee, and their left ankle was under their right knee.An undated policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident.The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.A care plan for Resident #1, dated 02/23/26, showed the resident had diagnoses which included osteoarthritis of unspecified hip, cerebral infarction (a stroke), and aseptic necrosis of the left femur. The care plan showed the the resident required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-21 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure individual financial records were available through quarterly statements and upon request for 3 (#2, 4, and #6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for personal funds. The administrator identified 27 residents with trust fund accounts. Findings:An undated policy titled Resident Personal Funds Accounting and Records, read in part, 3. The individual financial record must be available to the residents through quarterly statements and upon request.Review of resident records for Resident #2 from 01/01/25 to 07/17/25 showed no financial statements were available.Review of resident records for Resident #4 from 01/01/25 to 07/17/25 showed no financial statements were available. Review of resident records for Resident #6 from 01/01/25 to 07/17/25 showed no financial statements were available. On 07/17/25 at 1:34 p.m., the business office manager stated the residents could ask for their balance and it would be told to them, but they did not provide the residents with a quarterly statement. The business office manager stated they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for 2 (#7 and #8) of 8 residents sampled who were reviewed for care plans.The administrator identified 55 residents resided at the facility.Findings:1.An admission assessment for Resident #7, dated 01/03/25, showed a BIMS score of 00, which indicated Resident #7 was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision making. The assessment showed diagnoses which included cerebral vascular accident (CVA/stroke), transient ischemic attack (TIA/mini stroke or brief stroke-like attack caused by a blood clot that blocks blood flow to the brain), and Parkinson's disease.A care plan for Resident #7, dated 01/27/25, showed no concerns for CVA or TIA.A progress note, dated 07/12/25 at 12:55 p.m., showed Resident #7 was unable to sit up and eat at lunchtime. The note showed Resident #7 kept falling forward and putting their head on the table and were returned to their bed. The note was entered by RN #1.A progress note, dated 07/14/25 at 7:22 p.m., showed the representative of Resident #7 reported the resident had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered by the person preparing the medication for 1 of 1 observation.The administrator identified 55 residents received medications. Findings: On 07/16/25 at 10:30 a.m., CMA #5 was observed preparing an unknown resident's medication. After preparing the medication, CMA #5 gave CMA #6 the medication who took the medication down the hall and administered it to an unknown resident. On 07/16/25 at 11:00 a.m., CMA #5 stated it was not facility policy to prepare medication and allow another CMA to administer it. CMA #5 stated they had no explanation as to why they were administering medication in that manner. On 07/16/25 at 11:10 a.m., CMA #6 stated you should not administer medication you did not prepare. On 07/16/25 at 11:30 a.m., the DON stated it was not facility policy for one CMA to administer medication prepared by another CMA.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician for 1 (#8) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for medication administration.The administrator identified 55 residents received medications at the facility.Findings:A physician's order for Resident #8, dated [DATE], showed to administer a 24-hour transdermal nitroglycerin patch 0.1mg/hour every morning for angina pectoris.An annual assessment, dated [DATE], showed a BIMS of 15 which indicated Resident #8 was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The assessment showed diagnoses which included diabetes, heart failure, hypertension, angina pectoris, and end stage renal disease.A [DATE] MAR, showed on [DATE] Resident #8 did not receive the nitroglycerin patch as ordered.A progress note, dated [DATE] at 7:46 a.m., showed Resident #8 complained of chest pain to RN #1. The note showed RN #1 completed vital signs for Resident #8 and were within normal limits. The note showed Resident #8 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean ice machine. The roster matrix documented 53 residents who utilize ice from the ice machine. Findings: On 02/05/25 at 2:50 p.m., an observation of the ice machine was performed with the maintenance supervisor. There was a slimy black substance observed on the top and interior of the plastic cover, along each side of the water reservoir, and near the water pump which hung above and in the water reservoir. On 02/05/25 at 2:53 p.m., the maintenance supervisor stated the ice machine was dirty. The maintenance supervisor stated they did not know who was responsible for cleaning the ice machine. On 02/05/25 at 3:15 p.m., the administrator stated they were made aware of the dirty ice machine. They did not know who was responsible for cleaning the ice machine. They stated they would coordinate with the dietary manager and maintenance supervisor and work out a routine schedule for cleaning the ice machine.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect a resident from abuse for one (#1) of six sampled residents whose clinical records were reviewed for abuse. The Resident Listing Report, dated 10/24/24, documented 54 residents. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. The quarterly assessment, dated 07/17/24, documented the resident was cognitively intact, exhibited no behaviors, required supervision or touch assistance for activities of daily living, and required supervision or touch assistance for ambulation. The care plan, revised 10/08/24, documented the resident had the potential to demonstrate verbally abusive behaviors related to poor impulse control. The care plan, read in part, when I become agitated, intervene before verbal agitation escalates. Guide me away from [the] source of distress. Engage [me] calmly in conversation. If response is aggressive walk away, [sic] and approach later. A hand…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed the infection control guidelines to prevent the potential spread of communicable disease. The DON identified 40 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Handling Soiled Linen policy, undated, read in part, .3. Linen should not be allowed to touch the uniform or floor .4. Used or soiled linen shall be collected at the bedside (or point of use .) and placed in a linen bag or designated receptacle. When the task is complete, the bag shall be closed securely and placed in the soiled utility room. Soiled linen shall not be kept in the resident's room or bathroom .'' Res #1 had diagnoses which included CVA, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, DM, and frequent UTI's. A quarterly assessment, dated 01/12/24, documented Res #1's cognition was severely impaired, had an indwelling urinary catheter, and required extensive assistance with most ADLs. On 02/07/24 at 10:58 a.m., observed CNA #1 and CNA #2 transferring resident #1 from bed to their wheelchair via the sit to stand lift. CNA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' call lights were in reach for four (#3, 5, 6, and #7) of four sampled residents who were reviewed for call light placement. The DON identified 40 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A Call Lights: Accessible and Timely Response policy, undated, read in part, .Policy: The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance . 1. Res #3 had diagnoses which included mild intellectual disability, anxiety, macular degeneration, angina, overactive bladder, osteoporosis, and epilepsy. An admission assessment, dated 02/05/24, documented the resident's cognition was intact, frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, required moderate assistance with mobility with most ADLs. On 02/07/24 at 8:10 a.m., observed the resident in bed and their call light was hanging from the wall across the room from the resident. On 02/07/24 at 1:20 p.m., observed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$31,710 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $31,710 — penalty dated 2025-07-21
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-08-28 for 7 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SKYBLUE HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK