No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Beacon Ridge

102 East Line Avenue, Sapulpa, OK 74066 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 69 certified beds · (918) 216-1811 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (918) 216-1811 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Nov 2024Resident-funds citation (F0567)2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1021 E Bryan Ave · (918) 227-1000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
25 S Park St · (918) 224-3883 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
215 E Dewey Ave
Park
23 N Poplar St · (918) 227-5151 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.0%13.6%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.1%3.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%1.9%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%2.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.9%3.4%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%4.7%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.7%13.7%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication47.5%25.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.4%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.5%17.1%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table61.5%17.5%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.852.311.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.562.961.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.06U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.27
RN hours/ resident / day
0.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.18
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
60.0%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 69 beds and averages 51.4 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-11-21)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to effectively manage pain for 1 (#3) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for pain management. The DON identified 55 residents resided in the facility.Findings: An admit form for Resident #3, dated 07/17/23, showed the resident had diagnoses which included cerebral palsy, migraines, and chronic pain. A physician's order for Resident #3, dated 10/12/24, showed Tylenol (an analgesic) oral tablet 325 mg, give two tablets orally every four hours as needed for pain. A care plan for Resident #3, dated 01/27/25 read in part, resident had chronic pain r/t [related to] cerebral palsy. Interventions included repositioning, administer in analgesia, evaluate the effectiveness of the pain interventions after medication is administered, monitor/document for side effects of pain medication, monitor/document for side effects of pain medication, monitor/record/report to nurse any s/sx [signs/symptoms] of non-verbal pain, observe and report changes in usual routine, sleep patterns, decrease in functional abilities, decrease ROM [range of motion],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. give 30 days notice in writing of the resident's planned transfer/discharge to the resident/representative; b. send a copy of the notice of transfer/discharge to the ombudsman's office; c. provide the resident with a statement of the resident's appeal rights, including the name, address, and telephone number of the entity which received such requests; d. provide information on how to obtain an appeal form; e. assist the resident in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request; f. provide the mailing and email address and telephone number of the agency responsible for the protection and advocacy of individuals with developmental disabilities; and g. the mailing and email address and telephone number of the agency responsible for the protection and advocacy of individuals with a mental disorder for one (#1) of three sampled residents whose clinical records were reviewed for transfer/discharge requirements. The facility admission/discharge list documented four residents who were transferred to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the bed-hold policy to one (#1) of three sampled residents who were transferred to the hospital. The facility admission/discharge list documented four residents who were transferred to the hospital since 10/01/24. Findings: The facility policy, titled Bed-Holds and Returns and dated October 2022, read in parts, All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Residents, regardless of payer source, are provided written notice about these policies at least twice .notice 1: well in advance of any transfer (e.g. in the admission packet); and notice 2: at the time of transfer (or, if the transfer was an emergency, within 24 hours). Resident #1 had diagnoses which included fetal alcohol syndrome, schizophrenia, intellectual disabilities, and bipolar disorder. A nurse's progress note, dated 12/05/24, documented the resident was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to allow one (#1) of three sampled residents who were transferred to the hospital to return to the facility. The facility admission/discharge list documented four residents who were transferred to the hospital since 10/01/24. Findings: The facility policy, titled Transfer or Discharge, Facility-Initiated and dated October 2022, read in parts, Except as specified below, the resident and his or her representative are given a thirty (30)-day advance written notice of an impending transfer or discharge from this facility .When residents who are sent emergently to an acute care setting, these scenarios are considered facility-initiated transfers, NOT discharges, because the resident's return is generally expected. Residents who are sent emergently to an acute care setting, such as a hospital, are permitted to return to the facility .If discharge is initiated by the facility after an emergency tranfers to the hospital, the reason for discharge is based on the resident's status at the time the resident seeks return to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the right to formulate an advanced directive for three (#7, 32, and #107) of six sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. The DON identified 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Res #107's medical record did not contain an advanced directive or an advanced directive acknowledgement form. 2. Res #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Res #32's medical record did not contain an advanced directive or an advanced directive acknowledgement form. 3. Res #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Res #7's medical record did not contain an advanced directive or an advanced directive acknowledgement form. On 11/21/24 at 8:40 a.m., the corporate nurse stated the forms were not completed.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation after an allegation of abuse. The DON identified 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, dated 2024, read in part, An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect, or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect, or exploitation occur. The policy also read 4. Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegations; 5. Focusing the investigation on determining if abuse, neglect, or exploitation, and/or mistreatment has occurred, the extent, and cause, and; 6. Providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation. A facility reported incident, dated 10/04/24, documented an allegation of abuse. The report to OSDH did not include supplemental documentation regarding an investigation. On 11/19/24 at 10:34 a.m., the administrator stated they were responsible for investigations of abuse. They…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete quarterly MDS assessments timely for three (#13, 20, and #31) of five sampled residents reviewed for MDS assessment completion. The DON identified 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.19.1, dated October 2024, documented quarterly assessments must be completed no later than 14 calendar days after the ARD. 1. Res #13 had a quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 10/15/24. The assessment was not completed until 11/18/24. 2. Res #20 had a quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 10/15/24. The assessment was not completed until 11/18/24. 3. Res #31 had a quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 10/14/24. The assessment was not completed until 11/12/24. On 11/19/24 at 9:30 a.m., the MDS coordinator stated the facility had been without an MDS coordinator for about five months. They stated they were aware there was an issue with completion of MDS assessments.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for: a. diabetic monitoring for one (#5) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications; b. ADLs for one (#47) of three sampled residents reviewed for ADLs; c. pressure ulcers for one (#17) of two sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, and d. psychotropic medications and diagnosis of psychosis for one (#31) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 57 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included type II diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation. A physician order, dated 08/22/24, documented to administer insulin glargine 10 units subcutaneously at bedtime for type II diabetes mellitus. A physician order, dated 08/22/24, documented to obtain FSBS and administer insulin lispro per sliding scale before meals for type II diabetes mellitus. A physician order, dated 08/22/24, documented to administer metformin (hypoglycemic medication) 500 mg two tablets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. perform an entrapment risk assessment for four (#3, 5, 14, and #44); b. obtain a physician order for one (#3); d. obtain an informed consent for four (#3, 5, 14, and #44); and e. develop a care plan for side rail use for two (#3 and #14) of four sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. The DON identified 13 residents whose beds were equipped with a bed rail of any type. Findings: An undated Proper Use of Bed Rails policy, read in parts, As part of the resident's comprehensive assessment, the following components will be considered when determining the resident's needs, and whether or not the use of bed rails meets those needs: medical diagnosis, behavioral symptoms, size and weight, sleep habits, medications, acute medical or surgical interventions, underlying medical conditions, existence of delirium, ability to toilet self safely, cognition, communication, mobility, risk of falling .The resident assessment should assess the resident's risk of entrapment between the mattress and bed rail or in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error occurred when the incorrect dosage of medication was administered for multiple administrations of a prescribed corticosteroid (steroid) for one (#55) of four sampled residents whose medication administration records were reviewed. The ADON identified 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Medication Errors policy, read in part, The facility shall ensure medications will be administered according to physician's orders .Medication errors, once identified, will be evaluated to determine if considered significant or not by utilizing the following three general guidelines .c. Frequency of Error: If an error is occurring repeatedly such as an omission of a resident's medication several times. Resident #55 had diagnoses that included adrenocortical insufficiency and hypothyroidism. A physician's order for Resident #55 documented they were to receive fludrocortisone (steroid) 0.1mg tab - 0.5mg (5 tabs)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and dishes were sanitized prior to use. The DON identified 57 residents resided in the facility and received services from the kitchen. Findings: An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 11/18/24 at 10:39 a.m. The following observations were made: a. an open bottle of nectar thickened water with lemon, dated open on 11/07/24. The label on the container documented to discard after 10 days of opening; b. an open bottle of nectar thickened orange juice, dated open 11/03/24. The label on the container documented to discard after 10 days of opening; c. an open bottle of honey thickened orange juice, not dated when opened; d. an open bottle of honey thickened milk, dated open on 11/07/24. The label on the container documented to discard after four days of opening; e. an open bottle of honey thickened orange juice, not dated when opened; and d. the walk in freezer door was observed with ice accumulation on the outside of the seal to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a water management program to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in the building water system. The DON identified 57 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A Legionella Water Management policy, revised September 2022, read in part, As part of the infection control prevention and control program, our facility has a water management program, which is overseen by the water management team .The purposes of the water management program are to identify areas in the water system where Legionella bacteria can grow and spread, and to reduce the risk of Legionnaire's disease .The water management program includes the following elements: an interdisciplinary water management team, a detailed description and diagram of the water system in the facility, the identification of areas in the water system that could encourage the growth and spread of Legionella or other waterborne bacteria, the identification of situations that could lead to Legionella growth, specific measures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for four (#3, 5, 14, and #44) of four sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. The DON identified 13 residents whose beds were equipped with a bed rail of any type. Findings: An undated Proper Use of Bed Rails policy, read in parts, If bed rails are used, the facility ensures correct installation, use, and maintenance of the rails .The facility will assure the correct installation and maintenance of bed rails, prior to use. This includes: checking with the manufacturer(s) to make sure the bed rails, mattress, and bed frame are compatible and ensuring that the bed's dimensions are appropriate for the resident .Conducting routine preventative maintenance of beds and bed rails to ensure they meet current safety standards and are not in need of repair .The maintenance director, or designee, is responsible for adhering to a routine maintenance and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to OSDH within two hours. The DON identified 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, dated 2024, documented the facility was to report all allegations of abuse immediately, but no longer than two hours after the allegation was made. A facility reported incident, dated 10/16/24, documented an allegation of abuse regarding LPN #3. The incident report was not sent to OSDH until 10/17/24. On 11/19/24 at 11:58 a.m., the MDS coordinator stated the incident report should have been sent to OSDH within two hours, but was not.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete comprehensive MDS assessments within the required time frame for two (#15 and #109) of five sampled residents reviewed for MDS assessment completion. The DON identified 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.19.1, dated October 2024, documented a significant change MDS must be completed no later than the 14th calendar day after determination a significant change had occurred. The manual also documented an admission assessment must be completed no later than the 14th day of the resident's admission. 1. Res #15 had a significant change assessment with an ARD of 10/16/24, reflective of the determination date a significant change had occurred. The MDS was not completed and signed until 11/18/24. 2. Res #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive MDS was not completed until 11/18/24. On 11/19/24 at 9:30 a.m., the MDS coordinator stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for one (#109) of five sampled residents reviewed for MDS completion. The DON identified 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 11/18/24 there was no active care plan documented in the resident's chart. On 11/19/24 at 9:30 a.m., the MDS coordinator stated baseline care plans should be completed within 48 hours of admission. They stated the facility had been without a MDS coordinator for about five months. They stated they were aware there were some issues with care plans.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to review/revise a care plan for one (#17) of 15 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The DON identified 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #17 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease, HTN, and chronic pain syndrome. A significant change assessment, dated 09/15/24, documented the resident was frequently incontinent of bladder and required partial to moderate assist with transfers. The assessment did not document the resident had an uindwelling catheter. A physician's order, dated 10/15/24, documented Hoyer lift with all transfers. On 11/18/24 at 11:40 a.m., Resident #17 was observed resting in bed with their eyes open. A catheter was observed draining to gravity at bedside. The resident's record was reviewed and the care plan had not been revised to document transfers with a lift or the catheter. On 11/20/24 at 12:03 p.m., the corporate nurse stated the care plan should have been revised to contain transfers with the lift and the catheter.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facilty failed to obtain a physician's order for a catheter for one (#17) of one sampled resident reviewed for catheters. The DON identified 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #17 admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease, HTN, and chronic pain syndrome. On 11/18/24 at 11:40 a.m., resident #17 was observed resting in bed with their eyes open. A catheter was observed draining to gravity at bedside. The resident's record was reviewed and did not contain a physician's order for a catheter. The resident's care plan was reviewed and did not document the resident's catheter. On 11/20/24 at 12:03 p.m., the corporate nurse stated a physician's order should have been obtained and the care plan for the catheter should have been developed.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. A total of 30 opportunities were observed with two errors. The total medication error rate was 6.67% related to incorrect doses of medication given to one (#55) of four sampled residents observed during the medication pass. The ADON identified 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Medication Errors policy, read in part, The facility must ensure that it is free of medication error rates of 5% or greater. A physician's order for Resident #55 documented they were to receive fludrocortisone (steroid) 0.1mg tab - 0.5mg (5 tabs) by mouth daily and vitamin D3 25mg by mouth daily. A notation on the label of the blister pack for Resident #55's fludrocortisone 0.1mg tab read in part, give 5 tablets by mouth daily. The label on the blister pack for Resident #55's vitamin D3 read in part, vitamin D3 1,000 IU. On 11/20/24 at 10:24 a.m., CMA #1 was observed while administering medications to Resident #55. Medications administered by CMA #1 to Resident #55…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the QAA committee met at least quarterly. The DON identified 57 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The QAA committee meetings were reviewed. The last QAA meeting documented was February of 2024. A QAA form, dated 08/22/24, documented a meeting was not completed in August 2024 due to the lack of a DON and staff. On 11/21/24 at 9:25 a.m., the interim administrator stated QAA meetings should have been completed quarterly. On 11/21/24 at 9:41 a.m., the interim administrator stated documentation of quarterly QAA meetings could not be located.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment. The BOM identified 56 residents resided in the facility Findings: On 01/24/24 at 8:03 a.m., the BOM was asked for a copy of the facility assessment. They stated they were unsure what a facility assessment was but would ask the stand-in administrator. On 01/24/24 at 12:03 a.m., the stand-in administrator presented their emergency preparedness book. They were informed it was not a facility assessment. They stated they would continue to look for the it. On 01/25/24 at 9:25 a.m., the stand-in administrator presented their emergency preparedness book stating this was their facility assessment. They were informed of the components required for a facility assessment. They stated they had never heard of a facility assessment and had never seen one in any of their buildings. On 01/25/24 at 10:00 a.m., the stand-in administrator stated they were unable to locate a facility assessment.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: a. implement their infection control program to prevent potential spreading of influenza; b. ensure OSDH was notified when residents and/or facility staff had a positive influenza test result; and c. implement a surveillance plan for identifying, tracking, monitoring and/or reporting signs/symptoms of influenza for six (#1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and #9) of seven residents sampled for infection control. The BOM identified 56 residents resided in the facility Findings: A facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised October 2018, documented, .7. Surveillance .b. Surveillance tools are used for recognizing the occurrence of infections, recording their number and frequency, detecting outbreaks .monitoring employee infection, monitoring adherence to infection prevention and control practices .10. Outbreak Management a. Outbreak management is a process that consists of . (3) preventing the spread to other residents .11. Prevention of Infection a. (4) communicating the importance of standard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed related to the resident's dental status for one (#10) of three sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The administrator identified 52 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Res #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes, dental caries, and hypertension. An admission assessment, dated 04/18/23, documented the resident's dental status was obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. There was no comprehensive care plan developed or implemented for Res #10's dental status and to include their upper and lower teeth extractions. On 01/09/23 at 1:17 p.m., the DON stated a comprehensive care plan related to the resident's dental status had not been completed but should have been.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete for one (#10) of three residents whose records were reviewed. The administrator identified 52 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes, dental caries, and hypertension, right shoulder pain, and atrial fibrillation. An admission assessment, dated 04/18/23, documented Res #10's cognition was intact and was dependent on staff for most ADLs. A physician's progress note, dated 07/24/23, documented Res #10 attended an appointment with an orthopedic physician. There was no documentation found in the resident's record they had attended the appointment or when the resident returned to the facility. There also was no nursing documentation of the resident's condition upon return to the facility or if any physician orders were put in place. A physician's progress note, dated 10/11/23, documented Res #10 attended an appointment with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-08 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to monies held in their trust account at all times for two (#14 and #206) of two sampled residents for access to their trust funds. The Resident Census and Condition of the Residents report, dated 09/08/23, documented 55 residents resided in the facility. The BOM identified 39 residents in the trust account. Findings: The Management of Residents' Personal Fund, policy, revised 03/2021, read in part, .Should our facility be appointed the residents' representative payee, and directly receives monthly benefits which the resident is entitled , such funds are managed in accordance with established policies and federal/state requirements . The BOM could not provide any financial statement's on resident held trust accounts prior to 07/01/23. On 09/05/23 at 1:59 p.m., Resident #206 stated they did not have access to their funds held in the trust account from January 2023 through August 2023. On 09/06/23 at 6:07 a.m., Resident #14 was asked about how their personal funds were managed. They stated from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-08 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a NOMNC and SNF ABN were provided for a facility initiated discharge from Medicare Part A services with days remaining for two (#256 and #23) of three sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The Entrance Conference Worksheet, undated, documented three residents discharged from Medication Part A services with days remaining in the last six months. Findings: An Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage, policy, undated, read in part, .The ABN is a notice given to beneficiaries in Original Medicare to convey that Medicare is not likely to provide coverage in a specific case .healthcare providers .must complete the ABN as described below in order to transfer potential financial liability to the beneficiary, and deliver the notice prior to providing the items or services that are the subject of the notice . A SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review report, documented Resident #256 started Medicare Part A skilled services on 03/29/23 and the last covered day was 04/14/23. It documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was completed for two (#19 and #255) of 15 sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/08/23, identified 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Care Planning policy, revised date, March 2022, read in part .the comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven (7) days of completion of the required MDS assessment (Admission, Annual or Significant Change in Status), no more that 21 days after admission . 1. Resident #19 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included dementia, and atrial fibrillation. A Care Plan, dated, 07/13/23 documented one focus regarding personal choices. There were no other focus areas documented on the care plan. On 09/06/23 at 11:25 a.m., MDS coordinator #1 was asked what the policy was on implementing a comprehensive care plan. They stated I am not sure. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided an involuntary notice of discharge that met the federal requirements for one (#256) of one sampled resident reviewed for involuntary discharge. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/08/23, identified 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #256 had diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia, depression, and dementia. A Nurse Progress Note dated, 8/11/23, read in part, .resident was indeed unresponsive, EMSA arrived, resident transferred to [hospital] . A Hospital Physician Discharge Note, dated 08/15/23, read in part, .on arrival to our facility the resident was otherwise medically stable however prior nursing home refused to accept to patient back stating that the resident was discharged that day due to nonpayment and because of chronic medical issues they cannot take care of . There was no documentation that a 30 day involuntary discharge notice had been given to Resident #256 or family. On 09/07/23 at 8:15 a.m., the Administrator was asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were allowed to return to the facility after they were hospitalized for one (#256) of two sampled residents reviewed for discharges. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/08/23, identified 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A admission Agreement document, undated, read in parts, .either party may terminate this agreement by giving a 30 day notice . Resident #256 had diagnoses which included dementia, schizophrenia, depression. A Nurses Progress Note, dated 08/11/23, documented to transfer the resident to the hospital. On 09/07/23 at 8:15 a.m., the Administrator was asked what the policy was for readmission to the facility after a hospital stay. She stated the facility tries to accommodate date every residents needs. She was asked if Resident #256 wanted to come back to the facility. She stated Yes, and he was refused because the facility could not take care of resident.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was revised to reflect fall interventions for one (#16) of 15 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The Residents Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 09/08/23, documented 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #16 had diagnoses which included dementia and displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur. A Nurse Progress Note, dated 04/05/23, read in part, .resident outside for .smoke break observed by staff tripping over leg of chair fell onto right knee and right side resident got right back up and said I'm okay .Assess outside area when [Resident] goes out for smoke break to make sure chairs are not to close together assist resident with pulling out chair or move chair for [Resident] assist with seating to ensure safety . A Nurse Progress Note, dated 05/22/23, read in part, .Resident just got a pop out of the vending machine turned to walk away lost balance fell onto left hip . A Care Plan, revised on 05/23/23, did not document any interventions for the falls…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's referral for an outside appointment was completed timely for one (#17) of two residents reviewed for social services. The Residents Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 09/08/23, documented 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Referral Policy, undated, read in part, .Our facility policy strives to act promptly on resident referrals to outside doctors/specialists. Once a referral is received the following takes place .The information is then given to our Social Service Director to schedule an appointment. This needs to be completed within 48 hours of receiving the information . Resident #17 had diagnoses which included glaucoma. A Quarterly Assessment, dated 06/08/23, documented Resident #17's cognition was intact. A Physician's Order, dated 08/24/23, documented, .Referral to see an optometrist . On 09/05/23 at 10:04 a.m., Resident #17 stated they had a problem with their left eye. They stated they had received two different eye drops, but their eye continued to be puffy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure side effect monitoring was in place for a resident who was prescribed anticoagulants for one (#54) of five residents sampled for medication review. The Resident Census and Condition of the Residents report, dated 09/08/23, documented 55 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified six residents were prescribed anticoagulants. Findings: A High Risk Medications-Anticoagulants policy, undated, read in part, .The residents plan of care shall alert staff to monitor for adverse consequences. Risk associated with anticoagulant include: a. Bleeding and hemorrhage (bleeding gums, nosebleed, unusual bruising, blood in urine or stool) b. Fall in hematocrit or blood pressure c. Thromboembolism . Resident # 54 had diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, unspecified psychosis, and morbid obesity. A Physician order, dated 01/02/23, read in part, . Apixaban Tablet 5 MG Give 5 mg by mouth two times a day for Anti-coagulant . A Quarterly Assessment, dated 03/28/23, documented Resident #54's cognition was moderately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided to one (#40) of one sampled residents reviewed for dental services. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 09/08/23, documented 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Emergency Dental Care policy, undated, read in part, .dental care is available .Social services shall contact the consultant dentist to set up the appointment ( should social services not be available, the charge nurse shall contact the consultant dentist . Resident #40 had diagnoses which included depressive disorder, polyosteoarthritis, type 2 diabetes, and panic disorder. A Comprehensive Assessment, dated 04/23/23, documented the resident's cognition was mildly impaired. A Physician Order, dated 05/12/23, read in parts, .Ibuprofen Oral Tablet 600 MG .Give 600 mg by mouth every 6 hours for tooth pain . A Physician's Order, dated 06/27/23, read in part, .refer to dentist for possible gum/tooth infection . The MAR, dated 06/01/23 through 08/01/23, documented Resident #40 received Ibuprofen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a required staff in-service for dementia training was conducted annually for nurse assistants. The DON identified 24 residents with dementia resided in the facility. Findings: A Dementia protocol, revised November 2018, read in part .nursing assistants will receive initial training in the care of residents with dementia and related behaviors. In-services will be conducted at least annually . The facility in-service records were reviewed. There was no documented in-service for dementia training with nurse assistants since 04/22/22. On 09/07/23 at 10:53 a.m., the ADON was asked for the in-service logs for the facility. They stated there were no in-services since 11/28/22 and have not had one since. On 09/07/23 at 10:57 a.m., the DON was asked when in-service for nursing staff regarding dementia training had been conducted. She stated, I have not done any of the in-services.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure skills competency evaluations were conducted: a. annually for three certified nurse aides (#1, 2, and #3) of five personnel files reviewed. b. upon hire for three certified nurse aides (#4, 5, and #6) of three personnel files reviewed. The Administrator reported a census of 52 residents. Findings: A policy and procedure, labeled Competency Evaluation, dated 01/01/21, documented in parts .Policy: It is the policy of this facility to evaluate each employee to assure appropriate competencies and skills for performing his or her job and to meet the needs of facility residents .Initial competency is evaluated during the orientation process .subsequent and/or annual competency is evaluated at a frequency determined by the facility assessment .or/or job performance evaluations .checklists are used to document training and competency evaluations .employee competency forms are maintained .in the employee's personnel file . 1. CNA #1 was hired on 11/09/20. A review of the employee's personnel file did not document an annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-08 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a quarterly assessment was conducted every three months for two residents (#1 and #2) of two reviewed for timely submission of resident assessments. The Administrator reported a census of 52 residents. Findings: 1. Resident (Res) #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoeffective disorder bipolar type, and anxiety. A review of the Res's MDS assessment (a resident assessment tool used to identify resident care needs) documented the last quarterly MDS assessment was dated 08/20/21. The resident records did not document a November 2021 quarterly assessment. 2. Res #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included kidney failure, diabetes mellitus, and depression. A review of the Res's MDS documented the last quarterly MDS assessment was dated 09/27/21. The resident records did not document a December 2021 quarterly assessment. On 02/08/22 at 8:29…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-23 for 6 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-08 for 7 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SKYBLUE HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
RIVERS EDGE OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/06/2023
RIVERS EDGE PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 05/15/2025
OELBAUM, YITZCHOKIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST15%since 01/06/2023
GANZ, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2022
MANGANYA, RICHARDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2025
SPILLARS, RODGERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2022
KRAVETZ, AVROHOMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2023
RETTER, S. ARYEHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 97%Medicare 1%Other / private 2%

About 97% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$242per resident / day
operating cost
$7,350per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$216per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375572. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next