The Lodge At Brookline
5301 North Brookline, Oklahoma City, OK 73112 · For profit - Corporation · 132 certified beds · (405) 251-2847 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $25,057 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-10)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.0% | 13.6% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.6% | 3.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 3.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 4.7% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.4% | 13.7% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.2% | 25.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 4.7% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.7% | 17.1% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.5% | 17.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.8% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.5% | 74.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.0% | 27.3% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.0% | 16.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.13 | 2.31 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.57 | 2.96 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.9%CMS range 29.2–65.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.6%CMS range 8.7–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 66.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 66.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.7%CMS range 5.3–13.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 45.5 residents a day — about 34% occupied, or roughly 86 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.93 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On [DATE] an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure a Resident #4 received timely CPR per the physician's order when the resident was found unresponsive and without vital signs. The resident was pronounced deceased by EMS.On [DATE] at 11:26 a.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation.On [DATE] at 11:43 a.m., the administrator and DON were notified of the existence of the IJ situation and was provided the IJ template. On [DATE] at 4:28 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part, [DATE] 3:58pm1.The facility failed to initiate CPR immediately when a resident with a full code status was found without signs of life.2. All residents residing in the facility who are full code status are at risk.3. Staff are in-serviced on policy and procedure of Medical Emergency Response and educated on locations of Code Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A past noncompliance immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist effective [DATE] related to the facility's failure to immediately perform Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) on a Resident (Res) with full code status who was found not breathing and without a detectable heart beat. Res #42 was found by an unidentified Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) in bed and appeared not to be breathing. The unidentified CNA reported the findings to the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) immediately at approximately 6:00 a.m., who then assessed the resident and found him to have no signs of life. The LPN then notified the resident's family member, the administrator, the Director of Nursing (DON), and the Police. The LPN did not initiate CPR on Res #42 who had on file an order for full code. Approximately 53 minutes later, EMSA and the fire department arrived to initiate CPR. The fire department and EMSA were unable to revive Res #42. On [DATE] at 1:02 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure:a. urinary catheter care was completed as ordered for 1 (#7); andb. orders for urinary catheter care were transcribed and completed for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for urinary catheters.The administrator identified three residents with urinary catheters resided in the facility.Findings:A catheter care policy, with a handwritten date of 02/07/25, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care.Catheter care will be performed every shift and as needed by nursing personnel.1. A significant change resident assessment, dated 12/20/25, showed Resident #1 had an indwelling catheter, and diagnoses which included benign prostatic hyperplasia and viral hepatitis. A discontinued physician order, dated 01/28/25, showed staff were to provide catheter care to Resident #1 every shift related to neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder.The February 2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure orders for PEG tube care were transcribed and completed for 2 (#6 and #7) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for PEG tube care.The administrator identified five residents had PEG tubes.Findings:1.On 07/09/25 at 12:33 p.m., Resident #6's peg site was observed to have no gauze around it, There was some dark residue around the PEG site entrance into the abdomen and the clamp appeared to have red droplets on it. An undated PEG Site Cleaning Policy and Procedure, read in part, To ensure the safe and effective care of residents with PEG tubes, LTC facility staff will follow standardized procedures for routine PEG site cleaning to prevent infection, skin breakdown, and complications. Purpose: To maintain cleanliness, promote healing, and prevent infections or irritation at the PEG insertion site. Scope: This policy applies to all licensed nursing staff responsible for the care of residents with a PEG tube. Frequency: Daily, after any leakage or soiling, as per physician or wound care recommendations. Supplies…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were accurate for 3 (#1, 6, and #7) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accurate records.The administrator identified 47 residents resided in the facility.Findings:A charting and documentation policy, revised 07/2017, read in part, Documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete, and accurate.1.Resident #1's hospital records showed the resident was hospitalized [DATE] through 03/17/25.The March 2025 MAR showed Resident #1 was administered the following medications at the facility during the dates the resident was hospitalized :a. aricept 10 mg (a medication used to treat dementia) on the 13th, 15th and 16th;b. ferrous sulfate 325 mg (a supplement for low iron) on the 15th and 16th;c. megestrol acetate suspension 5 milliliters (appetite stimulant) on the 15th and 16th;d. protonix 40 mg (used to treat reflux) on the 15th and 16th;e. prozac 20 mg (used to treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions to promote pressure ulcer healing were implemented for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.The administrator identified three residents with pressure ulcers resided in the facility.Findings:A wound care policy, revised 10/2010, read in part, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing.Make the resident comfortable. Use supportive devices as instructed.An undated turning policy, read in part, To prevent pressure injuries, promote comfort, and maintain skin integrity by ensuring residents are turned and repositioned at appropriate intervals.All residents who are immobile, at risk for pressure ulcers, or require assistance will be turned and repositioned at a minimum of every two to three hours or as individually assessed and documented in the care plan. Position changes should be documented and communicated appropriately.Wound care provider visits notes, dated 02/06/25, 02/13/25, 02/20/25, 03/04/25, 03/11/25, 03/27/25, 04/01/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure PICC/central line care was provided and the site was assessed for 1 (#1) of one sampled resident reviewed for PICC lines. The administrator identified no residents with PICC lines resided in the facility at the time of the survey.Findings:A central venous catheter care and dressing change policy, revised 03/2022, read in part, The purpose of this procedure it to prevent complications associated with intravenous therapy, including catheter-related infections that are associated with contaminated, loosened, soiled, or wet dressings.A physician's order is not needed for this procedure.Perform site care and dressing change at established intervals or immediately if the integrity of the dressing is compromised.Change the dressing if it becomes damp, loosened or visibly soiled and.at least every seven days.Assess central venous access devices with each infusion and at least daily.Resident #1's discharge hospital summary, dated 10/18/24, showed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received their pain medication as ordered by the physician for 1 (#6) of 1 sampled residents reviewed for medications provided accurately.The administrator identified 47 residents resided in the facility. Findings:An Administering Medications policy, revised April 2019, read in part, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed.Staffing schedules are arranged to ensure that medications are administered without unnecessary interruptions.Medication administration times are determined by resident need and benefit, not staff convenience. Factors that are considered include: enhancing optimal therapeutic effect of the medication.A Controlled Drug Receipt, dated 06/04/25, showed the facility received 56 tabs of oxycodone (an opioid) 10 mg tablets for Resident #6. The receipt also showed the last tablet was administered to Resident #6 on 07/01/25 at 9:30 p.m.A Controlled Drug Receipt, dated 07/04/25, showed oxycodone was not available in the facility for Resident #6 again until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure grievance forms were posted in the designated location per facility policy. The administrator identified 39 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 11/26/24 at 2:20 p.m., a tour of the facility was conducted. Grievance information was posted at the entrance. It documented the grievance personnel, address, phone number, email, ombudsman's name and phone number, state survey agency phone number, and Adult Protective Services phone number. It documented the grievance forms could be found in a binder on the table in the front lobby. On 11/26/24 at 2:24 p.m., the front lobby table was observed with no grievance forms or binder. On 11/27/24 at 8:19 a.m., CNA #1 stated they did not know where the grievance forms were located. On 11/27/24 at 8:25 a.m., the social services director stated the forms were located in their office. They stated according to the grievance policy the forms should be on the table in the front lobby.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a MDS was coded accurately for one (#5) of six sampled residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. The administrator identified 39 residents resided in the facility. They identified one resident received noninvasive ventilator services. Findings: Resident #5 had diagnoses which included amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Resident #5's significant change in status resident assessment, dated 09/26/24, did not code Resident #5 received noninvasive ventilator services. On 11/26/24 at 2:56 p.m., a noninvasive ventilator was observed on Resident #5's bedside table. The device was off. On 11/27/24 at 11:04 a.m., Resident #5 stated they were admitted to the facility with a noninvasive ventilator. On 11/27/24 at 11:31 a.m., the DON stated Resident #5 had the noninvasive ventilator since admit. On 11/27/24 at 11:46 a.m., the DON stated they were responsible for completing care plans and MDS's. On 11/27/24 at 1:12 p.m., the DON stated they had looked at Resident #5's significant change in status MDS assessment and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan included the use of a noninvasive ventilator for one (#5) of two sampled residents reviewed for respiratory services. The administrator identified 16 residents received respiratory services. Findings: The Noninvasive Ventilation policy, dated 2023, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to provide noninvasive ventilation as per physician's orders and current standards of practice. Resident #5 had diagnoses which included amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Resident #5's care plan, dated 10/02/24, did not document the use of a noninvasive ventilator. On 11/26/24 at 2:56 p.m., a noninvasive ventilator was observed on Resident #5's bedside table. The device was off. On 11/26/24 at 2:58 p.m., Resident #5 stated they used the noninvasive ventilator at bedtime. The resident stated they were admitted to the facility with the noninvasive ventilator. On 11/27/24 at 11:31 a.m., the DON stated Resident #5 had the noninvasive ventilator since admit. On 11/27/24 at 11:46 a.m., the DON stated they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a physician order for the use of a noninvasive ventilator for one (#5) of two sampled residents reviewed for respiratory services. The administrator identified 16 residents received respiratory services. Findings: The Noninvasive Ventilation policy, dated 2023, read in part, The facility will obtain an order for the use of a CPAP, BiPAP, AVAPS or [name withheld] device and settings from the practitioner. Resident #5 had diagnoses which included amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. On 11/26/24 at 2:56 p.m., a noninvasive ventilator was observed on Resident #5's bedside table. The device was off. On 11/26/24 at 2:58 p.m., Resident #5 stated they used the noninvasive ventilator at bedtime. The resident stated they were admitted to the facility with the noninvasive ventilator. On 11/27/24 at 11:31 a.m., the DON stated Resident #5 had the noninvasive ventilator since admit. A physician's order, dated 11/27/24, documented noninvasive ventilator on at night and off in the morning at bedtime related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure emergency call cord was available in a resident's bathroom for one (#2) of three sampled residents whose emergency bathroom call system was observed. The administrator identified 39 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response policy, revised 10/21/24, read in part, The call system must be accessible to the resident at each toilet and bath or shower facility. The call system should be accessible to a resident lying on the floor. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Resident #2's care plan for daily care, dated 10/01/24, documented the resident was able to use their call light to call for help. On 11/26/24 at 11:28 a.m., Resident #2 stated they fell in the bathroom and could not reach the emergency call system. On 11/26/24 at 11:31 a.m., Resident #2's bathroom had a red emergency switch by the side of the toilet. Resident #2 stated they had not been able to walk around and depended on a wheelchair for locomotion. A resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were secured when not in use for three observations at random times throughout the survey on hall 400. The Executive Director identified 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Medication Storage policy, dated 7/2024, read in part, All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication rooms) under proper temperature controls. On 09/03/24 at 12:42 p.m., an observation of the nurse cart on hall 400 was unlocked and unattended. There were medications, insulin, needles, etc located inside. On 09/03/24 at 12:44 p.m., LPN #1 was observed exiting a resident room. They stated the cart was not locked and the policy was to lock it when step away. On 09/04/24 at 7:59 a.m., LPN #1 was observed to walk away from the medication cart on hall 400 with medication cups in both hands. The cart was unlocked. On 09/04/24 at 8:01 a.m., LPN #1 returned to the cart and stated they did it again and it was not locked. On 09/06/24 at 9:39…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate dishwasher temperature and sanitization concentration levels were reached on a high temperature dishwasher. The ED identified 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Dishwashing Machine Use policy, dated, 5/2024, read in parts, Dishwashing machines that use hot water to sanitize must maintain the following wash solution temperatures: c. 165 F for stationary rack, single temperature machines .Dishwashing machine hot water sanitation rinse temperatures may not be more than 194 F, or less than: a. 165 F for stationary rack, single temperature machines. b. 180 F for all other machines. The policy also read, A supervisor will ensure the dishwashing machine is checked for proper concentrations of sanitizer solution (measured as parts-per-million[PPM] or ml/L) .The supervisor will check the calibration of the gauge weekly . On 09/04/24 at 10:38 a.m. during the follow up tour of the kitchen, the high temperature dishwasher was observed. Dietary Aide #1 was asked to run the dishwasher and to check the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. enhanced barrier precautions were utilized for two of two (#2 and #21) residents observed with indwelling devices and open wounds, b. infection control practices were adhered to after providing resident care. The Executive Director identified 43 residents resided in the facility. The Resident Matrix, dated 09/03/24, documented five residents that resided in the facility had gastric tubes, three of which had urinary catheters, and two also had pressure ulcers. Findings: A Standard Precautions policy, dated 9/2017, read in part, Remove gloves promptly after use, before touching non-contaminated items and environmental surfaces, and before going to another resident and wash hands immediately to avoid transfer of microorganisms to other residents or environments. Place used disposable syringes and needles .and other sharp items in appropriate puncture-resistant containers located as close as practicable to the area in which the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the choice to formulate an advanced directive for one (#44) of 12 sampled residents whose advance directive acknowledgements were reviewed. The Executive Director identified 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #44 had diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm of the lungs and end stage renal disease. On 09/04/24 at 9:45 a.m., the ED was asked to locate the advanced directive acknowledgment. On 09/06/24 at 1:05 p.m., the ED was asked again to locate the advanced directive acknowledgement. They stated they were unable to locate the acknowledgement. They were asked for the policy. No policy was provided by the time of exit.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. privacy was maintained during provision of care for two (Resident #25, and an unidentified resident) of four residents whose protected health information and privacy was reviewed during a tour of the facility, and b. protected health information was secure, for two, (Resident #21 and #40). The Executive Director identified 43 residents in the facility. Findings: A HIPAA Security Measures policy, dated 07/24/2024, read in part, It is the facility's policy to implement reasonable and appropriate measures to protect and maintain the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the residents identifiable information and/or records that are in electronic format. A Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity policy, dated 07/24/24, read in part, Maintain resident privacy. On 09/04/24 at 8:43 a.m., observation made of a cart on hall 500 to be unlocked and the laptop open exposing resident information of resident #21. There was no nurse near the cart. LPN #4 was also observed walking to the cart with gloves on and had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident Assessments were accurately coded for two (#21 and #34) of 13 residents reviewed for assessments. The Executive Director identified 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Conducting an Accurate Resident Assessment policy, undated, read in part, qualified staff who are knowledgeable about the resident will conduct an accurate assessment addressing each resident's status, needs, strengths, and areas of decline. The assessment will be documented in the medical record. 1. Resident #21 had diagnoses which included gastrostomy, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, stage 4 right heel, osteomyelitis, and hepatitis C. An Annual Resident Assessment, dated 08/06/24, documented that anticoagulants were taken in the last 7 days and there was an indication for their use. There were no physician orders for anticoagulant use. On 09/06/24 at 10:48 a.m., LPN #1 stated the medication administration record for August does not show that resident #21 was taking anticoagulants. LPN #1 stated the MDS was coded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed in a timely manner for one (#38) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The Administrator identified 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Baseline Care Plan policy, undated, read in part, The baseline care plan will be developed within 48 hours of a residents admission. Resident # 38 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia, malnutrition, gastrostomy, and chronic pain. There was not a baseline care plan put into place within 48 hours. The comprehensive care plan was created on 06/26/24. On 09/06/24 at 10:39 a.m., LPN #1 Stated the baseline care plan must be completed within 48 hours, they stated the baseline care plan was not completed within the 48 hours and it should have been. On 09/06/24 at 10:58 a.m., the Executive Director stated the policy was for the baseline care plan to be completed within 48 hours.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure neurological checks were conducted and monitored after an unwitnessed fall for one (Resident #29) reviewed for falls. The ED identified 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #29 had diagnoses which included epilepsy, end stage renal disease, cirrhosis of the liver. A Nurse Note, dated, 08/27/24 at 2:47 p.m., documented, resident presented on [their] bedroom floor, upon entering resident's room resident observed resident laying on [their] right side. Noted resident's chair in front of [them]. Resident stated My chair was hurting my back and I didn't want to wait for someone to help me into bed, so I did it myself, I fell and now I can't get up. Head to toe evaluation implemented, no noted injuries, resident stated that [they] did not hit [their] head, no noted abnormalities to [their] head, no bruising, no hematomas, no skin tears, resident able to move all four extremities without any difficulty. Neurological checks initiated noted blood pressure 136/74, temperature 97.6, pulse 72, respirations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staffing information, which included the facility name, date, actual hours worked for RNs, LPNs, CMAs, and CNAs, and the resident census was updated. The ED identified 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 09/04/24 at 9:08 a.m., observed the staffing sheet posted on the wall next to the nurses station window that did not have the name of the facility or the census or hours on it. On 09/06/24 at 10:54 a.m., observed the staffing sheet posted on the wall next to the nurses station window. It did not have the census, the name of the facility, nor the hours or total number of hours listed. On 09/06/24 at 11:00 a.m. the ED was asked what was required to be on the posted staffing sheet. They stated each discipline for direct care and for the shift that they were on, the date, and the census. On 09/06/24 at 11:04 a.m., the ED stated it did not have the required information.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication was administered according to physician orders for one (#16) of five residents reviewed for medications. The Executive Director identified 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #16 had diagnoses which included systemic lupus erythematosus, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. A Medication Administration, policy, dated 2/2023, read in parts, Medication are administered .as ordered by the physician . The policy also read, Review MAR to identify medication to be administered .Sign MAR after administration . A physicians order dated 8/31/24 documented to start Aquaphor to body two times a day one time only for 10 days. The September TAR had no documentation for the Aquaphor administration for 9/1/24 through 9/10/24. There were x for 9/11/24 through 9/30/24. On 09/06/24 at 2:34 p.m., Resident #16's left foot was observed to be red and inflamed with dry scaling on the leg. Resident #16 stated the foot hurt all over and stated there was cream for it. On 09/06/24 at 2:09 p.m., LPN #2 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure emergency call cords were within reach for one dependent resident (#21) while lying in bed of 13 sampled residents reviewed for access to call light. The Executive Director identified 43 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response policy, dated 11/28/23, read in part, Staff will ensure the call light is within reach of resident and secured, as needed. On 09/03/24 at 1:15 p.m., the call light was observed hanging between the head of the bed and the wall, out of reach of resident #21 who was lying in bed and was dependent on staff for all ADL's. They were moaning in pain and stated they just have to scream to get staff attention. On 09/03/24 at 1:25 p.m., CNA #1 stated the call button was out of the reach of the resident, they stated resident #21 just had wound care and they must have moved it. The call light is supposed to be on resident #21's chest. On 09/04/24 at 2:56 p.m., the Executive Director agreed that call lights are supposed to be within the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain finger stick blood sugars in a manner to prevent cross contamination for three of four observations. The administrator identified 15 residents who received finger sick blood sugars. Findings: 1. Resident #2 had diagnosis to include diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, gout, anxiety, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, acute kidney failure, sleep apnea, respiratory failure A current physician's order for Resident #2 documented they received Novolog injections four times a day per sliding scale. 2. Resident #3 had diagnosis to include diabetes mellitus. A current physician's order for Resident #3 documented they received Insulin Lispro injections per sliding scale three times a day. 3. Resident #3 had diagnosis to include diabetes mellitus. The current physician's order for Resident #4 documented they received Humalog injections per sliding scale before meals. On 05/29/24 at 11:41 a.m., LPN#1 was observed completing a finger stick blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to address and document a grievnaces of clothing and medical equipment for one (#1) of four sampled residents reviewed for grievnaces. The administrator identified 43 residents currently resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy, Resident and Family Grievances, read in part, .Evidence demonstrating the results of all grievances will be maintained for a period of no less than 3 years from the issuance of the grievance decision .The facility will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances . Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include severe protein Calorie Malnutrition, and end stage renal disease. A hand written social service note, dated 04/23/24, documented Resident #1 family had complained about missing wheelchair, purse, and clothes. A review of Resident #1 clinical record contained no additional documentation the resident or the family had any complaints or grievnaces and the resolution of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary with a recapitulation of stay for one (#1) of one sampled resident reviewed. The administrator identified eight residents who have discharged from the he facility since 04/02/24. Findings: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include protein calorie malnutrition, diabetes mellitus and cachexia. A review of the progress notes, dated 04/22/24, documented the resident was discharged from the facility and went home with their daughter. A discharge instruction form, dated 05/14/24, documented the resident went home with their daughter and medications were provided to them. There was no documentation of a complete summary of the residents stay. There was no documentation in the clinical record the facility completed a discharge summary for Resident #1 with a recapitulation of their stay. On 05/30/2024 at 10:48 a.m., the administrator was asked for the discharge summary for Resident #1. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-03 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a SNF ABN form was provided when a resident discharged from Medicare Part A stay with benefit days remaining for two (#11 and #49) of three sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The MDS Coordinator identified 10 residents who had discharged from Medicare Part A stay with benefit days remaining in the past six months. Findings: An Advance Beneficiary Notices policy, revised 03/19, read in parts, .It is the policy of this facility to provide timely notices regarding Medicare eligibility and coverage .The facility shall inform Medicare beneficiaries of his or her potential liability for payment .For Part A items and services, the facility shall use the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) . 1. Resident #11's Medicare Part A skilled services start date was 12/17/22 and last covered day of Part A service was 01/20/23. The facility did not provide a SNF ABN form to the resident. 2. Resident #49's Medicare Part A skilled services start date was 03/09/23 and last covered day of Part A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided for one (#13) of three sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/31/23, documented 46 residents required assistance with bathing. Findings: Resident #13 had diagnosis which included DMII, CKD, ASHD, and ESRD. A quarterly assessment, dated 07/08/23, documented Resident #13 required extensive assistance of one person with bathing. A care plan, dated 07/26/23, documented Resident #13 preferred showers and was able to help with some of the bathing, but needed staff to transfer and set up. A review of the May, June, July, and August 2023 bathing task documented Resident #13 had missed 6 out of 42 opportunities for bathing. On 08/02/23 at 8:14 a.m., Resident #13 stated they never received a shower because staff could not do it. They stated their last shower was on Sunday (07/30/23). Resident #13 stated they were supposed to receive a bath/shower on Sunday, Tuesday, and Friday. On 08/03/23 at 8:26 a.m., CNA #4 was asked when Resident #13 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. the count was verified for controlled medications awaiting destruction for eight (#24, 49, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105 and #106), and b. the count was verified when controlled medications were acquired from pharmacy for three (#49, 101, and #102) of eight sampled residents whose narcotic sheets were reviewed during medication storage. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/31/23, documented 46 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Controlled Substance Storage policy, dated April 2015, read in parts, Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage, disposal and record keeping in the facility in accordance with federal, state and other applicable laws and regulations .A controlled substance accountability record is prepared by the pharmacy/facility for all Schedule II, III, IV, and V medications .The following information is completed on the accountability form upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate did not exceed five percent. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/31/23, documented 46 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #22 had diagnoses which included unspecified atrial fibrillation and essential hypertension. A physician's order, dated 03/17/23, documented Amlodipine Besylate 5mg daily. A physician's order, dated 03/17/23, documented Digoxin 125 mg daily, hold if pulse below 60 bpm. A physician's order, dated 03/17/23, documented Metoprolol Succinate ER 100 mg daily. A physician's order, dated 08/01/23, documented Cozaar 25 mg daily, call attending physician for blood pressure greater than 145 systolic or 90 diastolic or Less than 105 systolic or 65 diastolic. On 08/01/23 at 7:45 a.m., CMA #1 was observed removing the blood pressure machine from Resident #22's room which read 113/62 with a pulse of 68. CMA #1 was observed gathering Resident #22's morning medication and stated they were holding some of their medication because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one (#24) of 15 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/31/23, documented 46 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Comprehensive Care Plans policy, revised October 2022, read in parts, .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial need that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment . The comprehensive care plan will be developed within 7 days after the completion of the comprehensive MDS assessment. All Care Assessment Areas (CAAs) triggered by the MDS will be considered in developing the plan of care. Other factors identified by the interdisciplinary team, or in accordance with the resident's preferences, will also be addressed in the plan of care .The services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had an appropriate diagnosis for use of an antipsychotic medication for one (#36) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/31/23, documented 33 residents received psychoactive medications. Findings: A Medication Regimen Review policy, revised February 2023, read in parts, .The drug regimen of each resident is reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist and includes a review of the resident's medical chart .Facility staff shall act upon all recommendations according to procedures for addressing medication regimen review irregularities . Resident #36 had diagnoses which included neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety, and depressed mood. A Pharmaceutical Consultant Report, dated 05/18/23, documented Resident #36 had an order for Zyprexa (antipsychotic medication) 10mg at hour of sleep for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was not a significant medication error for one (#22) of four residents observed during medication administration. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/31/23, documented 46 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #22 had diagnoses which included unspecified atrial fibrillation and essential hypertension. A physician's order, dated 03/17/23 documented Digoxin 125 mg daily, hold if pulse below 60 bpm. A physician's order, dated 03/17/23 documented Metoprolol Succinate ER 100 mg daily. On 08/01/23 at 7:45 a.m., CMA #1 was observed removing the blood pressure machine from Resident #22's room which read 113/62 with a pulse of 68. CMA #1 was observed gathering Resident #22's morning medication and stated they were holding some of their medication because the vitals were too low. On 08/01/23 at 7:53 a.m., CMA #1 administered Resident #22's medications. CMA #1 did not administer the resident's Digoxin, and metaprolol. On 08/01/23 at 2:14 p.m., CMA #1 was asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication carts left unattended were securely locked at all times for one of two medication carts observed. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 07/31/23, documented 46 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Equipment and Supplies for Administering Medications policy, dated April 2015, read in parts .During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse or aide .The cart must be clearly visible to the personnel administering medications, and all outward sides must be inaccessible to residents or others passing by. On 08/01/23 at 7:53 a.m., CMA #1 was observed during medication administration for Resident #22, to walk away from the medication cart with medications in hand. The medication cart was not locked. CMA #1 went into Resident #22's room located across the hall from the medication cart, not directly in front of the resident's room, and not in view of the CMA. On 08/01/23 at 8:00 a.m., CMA #1 was asked what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-10 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a 48 hour base line care plan for two, (#29 and #31) of 13 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 37 residents resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident (Res) #29 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included fracture of left femur, congestive heart failure, anxiety disorder, and diabetes mellitus. A review of Res #29's medical record did not document a 48 hour base line care plan had been completed. A baseline care plan template, dated 1/17/2022, was present in Res #29's care plan tab in the electronic medical record, however the template had not been filled out with Res #29's information. An admission MDS assessment, dated 01/24/22 documented Res #29 was moderately impaired in cognition and required extensive assistance with most activities of daily living (ADL) needs. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) triggered psychotropic drug use, cognitive loss, ADL…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans for four (#29, 30, 31, and #41) of 12 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The administrator identified 37 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident (Res) #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included endocarditis, MRSA infection, protein-calorie malnutrition, DM, emphysema, hypothyroidism, GERD, HTN, and dysphagia. An admission assessment, dated 02/01/22, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, required limited to extensive assistance with ADLs, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, received scheduled pain medication, had a stage II pressure ulcer, and received anticoagulant and antibiotic medication. On 03/07/22 at 8:13 a.m., the resident stated she had a sore on her bottom which was present when she admitted to the facility. She stated the facility staff were applying cream treatments. The resident's record did not contain a care plan to address the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Res #33 admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included COPD, diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. A MMR, dated 7/22/21, documented the pharmacist requested a reduction of Buspirone and/or Mirtazapine. The physician documented ''No'' to a dose reduction on 08/18/21. The physician did not provide a rational to the request. A MMR, dated 01/22/22, documented the pharmacist requested a reduction for Lexapro and/or Remeron. The physician's response to the MRR was not available in the resident's EHR. On 03/09/22 at 3:04 p.m., the administrator stated she was not able to find a response from the physician for the MMR form dated 01/22/22. The administrator stated she was not aware if the form had been sent or seen by the physician. 3. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, vascular dementia, chronic pain, and anxiety disorder. A spread sheet documented a MMR was conducted on 7/22/21, and the pharmacist asked for a reduction. There was no documentation provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled drugs along with other drugs subject to abuse were stored in locked compartments with a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment. The census and conditions form documented 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy, titled Medication Storage read in part . a. Schedule II drugs and back-up stock of Schedule III, IV, and V medications are stored under double-lock and key . b. Schedule II controlled medications are to be stored within a separately locked permanently affixed compartment when other medications are stored in the same area, such as in refrigerator . On 03/09/22 at 11:15 a.m., the administrator was interviewed regarding an unlocked cabinet in the DON office which contained a locking steel container, identified as the controlled medication storage for discontinued medications, which could be easily removed from the cabinet. The administrator stated this was not adequate for controlled medication storage. The administrator stated she did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 37 residents resided at the facility. Findings: On 03/07/22 at 5:57 a.m., a bell pepper with mold on it was observed in the refrigerator with an date opened of 02/14/22. On 03/07/22 at 6:01 a.m., a staff member in the kitchen was observed with a head wrap but no hair net covering the hair sticking out the top of wrap. On 03/07/22 at 1:18 p.m., the dietary manager (DM) stated the food in the refrigerator had either a use by date or opened date. At 1:23 p.m., the DM stated hair nets were to be used in the kitchen at all times. She stated she looked daily in the refrigerator and threw out any food expired or not usable. On 03/08/22 at 2:12 p.m., a dietary staff member was observed without a hair net covering braids which are not contained in a head wrap. At 10:20 a.m., a dietary staff member was observed with a hair net on but it was not in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and sanitary environment for one (31) of 16 residents reviewed for environment. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 37 residents resided at the facility. Findings: 1. On 03/07/22 at 5:43 a.m., a dirty table observed in the dining room it had various food items left from a meal the night before. Trash was observed on another table and trash and debris on the dining room floor. A resident came into the dining room for a drink and sat at a table with used napkins on the table. On 03/07/22 at 6:13 a.m., dietary aide (DA) #1 stated she got there at 6:00 a.m., and cleans the dining room before breakfast. On 03/07/22 at 6:21 a.m., the tables in the dining room were observed still dirty with food and trash on them. On 03/07/22 at 1:26 p.m., the dietary manager (DM) stated the dietary staff leave at 7:00 p.m. She stated when she left at 6:4., last night there were no plates on the tables…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to complete and transmit a discharge minimum data set (MDS) assessment in a timely manner for one (#2) of one resident sampled for transmission of assessments. The Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident (Res) #2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included traumatic amputation of two or more toes, osteomyeletis, and aseptic necrosis of right fingers. Res #2's medical record documented the resident was discharged from the facility on 11/21/21. The medical record did not document the discharge, return not anticipated, MDS assessment had been completed. On 03/08/22 at 4:59 p.m., the administrator reported a corporate registered nurse (RN) #1, who was familiar with MDS assessments, checked the residents medical records and reported the discharge MDS had not been completed or transmitted for Res #2.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers or baths to dependent residents for one (#34) of three residents reviewed for ADL assistance. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 37 residents resided at the facility. Findings: Resident (Res) #34 was admitted to the facility and had diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure, COPD, diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis and Parkinson's Disease. A significant change assessment, dated 12/26/22, documented the resident was cognitively intact and required total assistance with bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, toilet use, and bathing. The care plan last reviewed 01/13/22, documented the resident needed assistance with daily care. The care plan documented for bathing the resident preferred showers and did not need staff to give her assistance with bathing. A five day assessment, dated 02/05/22, documented the resident was cognitively intact and required total assistance with bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, dressing, toilet use,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer and observe the resident taking medication for one (#1) of 16 sampled residents observed on initial tour. The administrator identified 37 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident (Res) #1's admission assessment, dated 02/25/22, documented the resident was cognitively intact and required limited assistance with activities of daily living and supervision with eating. The assessment documented the resident received antianxiety, opioid, and antibiotic medications during the look-back period. The current physician orders documented to administer buspirone 5 mg for anxiety, pantoprazole 40 mg for GERD, gabapentin 300 mg for diabetic neuropathy, oxycodone-acetaminophen 7.5-325 mg for hip pain, and Colace 100 mg for constipation every morning. On 03/07/22 at 8:22 a.m., Res #1 was observed in his room. Medications were observed in a small plastic cup sitting by his breakfast meal on an overbed table. The resident refused to be interviewed. On 03/09/22 at 5:01 p.m., certified medication aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$25,057 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $25,057 — penalty dated 2025-07-10
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-08-27 for 7 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SKYBLUE HEALTHCARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| RIVERS EDGE OPERATIONS III LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2025 |
| RIVERS EDGE PARTNERS II LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2025 |
| GANZ, DAVID | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| HANOVER, YAACOV | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| KRAVETZ, AVROHOM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2025 |
| RETTER, S. ARYEH | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| LODGE AT BROOKLINE REALTY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| SKYBLUE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/22/2026 |
| MAXWELL, CHRISTINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| RAJU, SENTHIL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
| RIVERS EDGE PROPERTY HOLDINGS III LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375574. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.