No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Myrtle Point Rehabilitation & Care

637 Ash Street, Myrtle Point, OR 97458 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 35 certified beds · (541) 572-2066 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Dec 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
790 E 5th St · (541) 396-3111 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
418 8th St · (541) 572-2442 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.4%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.6%4.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.4%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.2%20.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.5%12.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers10.4%5.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.9%21.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.4%13.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.8%21.4%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.6%16.1%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.181.481.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.352.351.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.9%CMS range 29.3–59.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.5–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.811.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.73
RN hours/ resident / day
0.96
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.36
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.06
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.51
RN hoursweekends
67.2%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 35 beds and averages 25.4 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.36 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.35 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-10)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

71 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 58 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to timely respond to changes in condition and follow physician orders for 4 of 10 sampled residents (#s 2, 18, 26 and 129) reviewed for change of condition, position and mobility, UTIs and medications. This deficient practice was determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation as a result of a delay in treatment for Resident 129's sepsis (infection of the blood stream), UTI, lactic acidosis (buildup of lactic acid in blood stream), acute kidney failure, acute low blood pressure and GI bleed (bleeding in the intestinal tract). Resident 129 required hopsitalization, and died on [DATE]. Findings include: 1. Resident 129 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including heart attack, insomnia and muscle weakness. a. An 10/4/22 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 129's BIMS score was an eight indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident 129 received anticoagulant medications and required extensive assistence or was totally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide essential services related to dialysis for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#26) reviewed for dialysis. An immediate jeopardy situation was identified. The facility failed to provide essential dialysis-related assessment, care planning and monitoring to Resident 26 resulting in pain, extensive bruising, and the likelihood of severe medical complications such as infection, bleeding, fluid overload, and adverse side effects including death. Findings include: Resident 26 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including acute kidney failure. A 5/19/23 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 26's BIMS score was 15 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. A 7/19/23 5:43 PM Nursing Progress Note revealed Resident 26 went out of the facility to obtain a dialysis port. No documentation was found in the clinical record for Resident 26's dialysis, monitoring of the dialysis port, schedule for dialysis or any additional information related to dialysis including emergency procedures. A 7/20/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents and failed to implement fall risk interventions and thoroughly investigate falls for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 20 and 25) reviewed for accidents. Resident 20 experienced a fall resulting in a leg fracture. Findings include: 1. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including weakness and a history of falls. A 2/21/23 Hospital PT note indicated Resident 20 was a two-person maximum assist to sit on the edge of the bed and a two-person moderate assist to stand. A 3/1/23 through 3/31/23 Point of Care document indicated Resident 20 was provided extensive assistance with physical help for transfers and toilet use. Resident 20's MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident 20 was a two-person transfer. The 3/9/23 care plan indicated the resident would be free from falls and did not include transfer interventions. On 3/14/23 at 4:29 PM a Nursing Progress Note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided activities of choice for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 5, 8, 13, and 19) reviewed for choices and activities. This placed residents at risk of diminished psychosocial well-being. Findings include: The 1/2/26 Resident Council notes revealed resident concerns regarding not having enough social events and a lack of outings. Residents requested opportunities for bus rides, coffee outings, shopping, attendance at community events, and trips such as countryside drives and beach visits. The facility response indicated, we're working on getting more employees covered by company insurance so that we can take more residents on outings. The 2/27/26 Resident Council notes revealed residents expressed confusion about outings and concerns they are no longer able to go on outings. Residents requested clarification regarding the facility's plan to facilitate outings, including availability of a driver, and concerns the facility van was too small to accommodate multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity. Findings include:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 4/2024 with diagnoses including stroke and a fractured femur (thigh bone). A 1/12/26 Significant Change MDS and associated CAAS indicated Resident 1 had a BIMS assessment score of 10 (moderately impaired cognition), exhibited poor safety awareness, and required assistance by one staff for toileting transfers.A 4/4/26 Alleged Abuse indicated Staff 9 (LPN) directed Staff 6 (CNA) to assist Resident 1 with her/his urinal in bed. The report indicated Staff instructed Resident 1 to urinate in her/his brief because she/he continued to try and stand.A 4/5/26 statement by Staff 6 indicated she was only able to yell at Resident 1 because she/he was hard of hearing. Staff 6 acknowledged she told Resident 1 to urinate in her/his brief.On 4/9/26 at 7:30 PM, Staff 17 (CNA) stated she worked with Staff 6 on 4/4/26 and heard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to update a care plan to reflect changes in care needs for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#22) reviewed for bowel and bladder. This placed residents at risk for skin breakdown. Findings include:Resident 22 was admitted to the facility in 4/2025 with diagnoses including cerebral palsy (impaired muscle coordination) and chronic kidney disease. The 2/14/25 physician signed Skin Protocols for the facility indicated barrier cream (protection for the skin from urine or feces) was to be applied as needed per facility protocol. The 2/5/26 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 22 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and had a BIMS assessment score of 10 (moderately cognitively impaired).A 3/25/26 Skin Integrity report revealed a CNA reported skin discoloration and abrasions on both of Resident 22's upper inner thighs. The area was cleaned, barrier cream was applied and the resident's physician was notified. The 4/2026 TAR and physician orders revealed nystatin powder (antifungal medication) was topically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 1 sampled Resident (#32) reviewed for medication errors. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include: Resident 32 was admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with diagnoses including chronic pain and fibromyalgia (widespread pain and stiffness).The 4/2019 Administering Medication Policy Statement indicated: The individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method of administration before giving the medication. The 11/6/24 admission MDS indicated Resident 32 was cognitively intact.A review of the 1/2/25 Facility Investigation Summary revealed on 1/2/25 Staff 22 (Former CMA) administered Resident 32 her/his morning dose of Lyrica at 6:00 AM and then again at 11:00 AM. The second dose of Lyrica was to be administered 12 hours after the first dose.A physician order revealed Resident 32 had hydrocodone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure meal preferences were honored during posted mealtimes for 1 of 1 kitchen and 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 13 and 21) reviewed for food, choices, and kitchen. This placed residents at risk for lack of meal satisfaction. Findings include:The Undated Mealtimes postings located near the nurse station and kitchen indicated the following: -Breakfast was served from 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM.-Lunch was served from 12:00 PM to 1:00 PM.-Dinner was served from 5:30 PM to 6:30 PM.1. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes and heart failure.A 11/6/25 Annual MDS revealed a BIMS assessment score of 14 (cognitively intact) for Resident 13. On 4/6/26 at 12:23 PM, Resident 13 stated she/he received less food than normal during mealtimes. Resident 13 stated she/he received one pancake and wanted more and requested two bowls of cereal on another day but they ran out. On 4/9/26 at 9:56 AM, Staff 11 (Dietary Aide) stated staff were aware CNAs had complaints from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide education to residents and monitor personal food safety for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#13) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for food borne illnesses. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes and heart failure. A 3/2022 Foods Brought by Family/Visitors policy indicated the following:-Safe food handling practices were to be explained to family and visitors in a language and format they understand.-Food left with the resident to consume later was to include a label of the item, the use by date, and stored in the refrigerator.-The nursing staff was to discard perishable foods on or before the use by date. A 11/6/25 Annual MDS revealed a BIMS assessment score of 14 (cognitively intact) for Resident 13. On 4/7/26 at 9:00 AM, Resident 13 stated her/his private refrigerator in her/his room was not monitored. The temperatures was observed at 42 degrees. Inside the bottom of the refrigerator black debris was observed with drops of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide residents a private environment for physical intimacy for 2 of 4 sample residents (#s 1 and 2) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for lack of privacy. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 6/2023 with a diagnosis of chronic lung disease. Resident 1's 9/15/25's Quarterly MDS indicated she/he was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with a diagnosis of heart disease. Resident 2's 10/6/25's admission MDS revealed she/he was cognitively intact. Resident 1's 10/6/25 Progress Notes revealed on 10/5/25 staff spoke to Resident 1 about an incident when there was heavy petting outside the building and once inside the building where a resident of the opposite gender had her/his hands inside Resident 1's shirt. Resident 1 reported to staff the incident was consensual. Resident 1's 10/10/25 Sexual Consent Capacity Evaluation revealed she/he had the capacity to consent and had the desire to be sexually active. Resident 2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed for sexual consent for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for trauma. Findings include:Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 6/2023 with a diagnosis of chronic lung disease. Resident 1's 9/15/25's Quarterly MDS indicated she/he was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with a diagnosis of heart disease. Resident 2's 10/6/25's admission MDs indicated she/he was cognitively intact. Resident 1's 10/6/25 Progress Notes revealed on 10/5/25 staff spoke to Resident 1 about an incident when there was heavy petting outside the building and once inside the building when a resident of the opposite gender had her/his hands inside Resident 1's shirt. Resident 1 reported to staff the incident was consensual. On 10/13/25 at 4:17 PM Staff 3 (CNA) stated on 10/5/25 he went outside to bring the residents in from a smoke break and observed Resident 2 to have her/his hands up Resident 1's shirt. Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported within two hours for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for ongoing abuse. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 6/2023 with a diagnosis of chronic lung disease. Resident 1's 9/15/25's Quarterly MDS indicated she/he was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with a diagnosis of heart disease. Resident 2's 10/6/25's admission MDs indicated she/he was cognitively intact. A FRI dated 10/6/25 indicated on 10/5/25 at 8:30 PM Resident 2 was observed to have her/his hands up Resident 1's shirt. The incident was not reported to the administrator until 10/6/25 at 9:30 AM and was reported to the State agency on 10/6/25 at 11:08 AM. This was over 12 hours after the initial incident of potential abuse.On 10/14/2025 at 6:14 AM Staff 4 (Charge Nurse) stated he was not aware he needed to report potential abuse within two hours. On 10/14/25 11:59 AM Staff 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to employ a director of food and nutrition services with the required certification for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for qualified dietary staff. This placed residents at risk for unmet dietary needs. Findings include: On 11/7/24 at 3:12 PM Staff 23 (Dietary Manager) stated she would be certified in 2/2025 as a dietary manager. No documentation was provided for Staff 23's certification as a dietary manager. On 11/8/24 at 11:17 AM and 12:14 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) was informed Staff 23 currently lacked the required certification, and also did not have the required certification in 2023 which was identified during the annual recertification survey that year. Staff 1 stated Staff 23 was coming in on Sundays and working on the classes. Staff 1 stated since Staff 23's preceptor passed away, she did not complete the training. Staff 1 stated she was not aware the facility was cited previously for the same issue. Review of 2022 and 2023 recertification surveys revealed the facility was cited because Staff 23 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 58 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-08 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to submit Payroll Based Journal staffing data and other verifiable and auditable data as required for 1 of 1 facility reviewed. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate staffing data reporting. Findings include: Review of the Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data for fiscal year 2024, quarter three (4/1/24 through 6/30/24), revealed the facility failed to submit required data for the quarter. On 11/6/24 at 12:22 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she was unaware the data was not submitted until the survey team alerted her to the omission.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment, and failed to ensure residents' belongings were safe for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 18 and 19) and 1 of 1 sunroom reviewed for environment and personal property. This placed residents at risk for an unclean, un-homelike environment, and missing belongings. Findings include: 1. Resident 18 admitted to the facility in 4/2023 with a diagnosis of a stroke. A care plan updated 5/21/24 revealed Resident 18 had hearing aids, but chose not to wear them. On 11/4/24 at 1:21 PM Witness 1 (Complainant) stated Resident 18 had hearing aids, but they were not in her/his room. Witness 1 stated this was reported to staff. On 11/6/24 at 11:42 AM Staff 4 (CNA) stated Resident 18 had hearing aids, but she was not aware where the hearing aids were located. On 11/5/24 at 1:25 PM Staff 3 (Social Services) stated she did not have a grievance for Resident 18's hearing aids. On 11/7/24 at 11:56 AM Staff 2 (Interim DNS) stated Resident 18 had hearing aids, but staff were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from verbal abuse by staff and neglect related to failure to provide residents needed supplies for 4 of 5 sampled residents (#3, 14, 18, and 20) reviewed for supplies and abuse. Findings include: 1. Resident 14 admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with diagnoses including arthritis and intervertebral disc degeneration (one or more discs in the spine deteriorate). A 5/30/24 MDS revealed Resident 14's BIMS score was 15 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. A 7/14/24 Social Service Note written by Staff 20 (Former Administrator) indicated on 7/11/24 Resident 14 verbalized she/he would inform family members of her/his positive COVID-19 test results in the facility. Review of a Complex Medical Add On note revealed on 7/14/24 Resident 14 tested positive for COVID-19 and refused to stay inside her/his room. On 11/5/24 at 9:15 AM Staff 4 (CNA) stated in 7/2024 when the elevator did not work Staff 20 was yelling and screaming. On 11/5/24 at 11:58 AM Staff 25 (CNA) stated Staff 20 yelled at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to meet the needs of residents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#6) and 1 of 1 facility reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for decrease in quality of life. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease and depression. On [DATE] at 1:40 PM Resident 6 stated she/he wanted to go fishing more often and the facility could not take residents on outings because the facility van was not road legal. On [DATE] at 12:26 PM Staff 3 (Social Services/Activities) stated the facility van's registration was not up-to-date, and she could not take residents on outings. Observation of the facility van's registration stickers on [DATE] at 2:43 PM revealed the registration was out of date. On [DATE] at 10:04 AM multiple residents at the resident council meeting stated they were unhappy the van was not available, and they wanted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to have adequate staff available to meet the needs of residents for 2 of 4 residents (#s 14 and 18) reviewed for ADLs, and 1 of 1 facility reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 18 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including dementia and cognitive impairment. A 5/4/24 annual MDS revealed Resident 18 had moderate cognitive impairment. A 7/19/24 provider note stated Resident 18 had dementia and arrived at her/his appointment without their required facility staff escort. The note stated the provider called the facility and was told no escort was available due to short staffing. On 11/8/24 at 11:35 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated she expectated staff to accompany residents to their appointments as required. She acknowledged the provider note stating no facility staff escort was provided due to short staffing. 2. On 7/25/24 the State Survey Agency received a public complaint which indicated the facility was short staffed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents for 3 of 5 staff (#s 18, 26, and 27) reviewed for competencies. This placed residents at risk for poor quality of care and lack of competent staff. Findings include: On 11/5/24 Staff 1 (Administrator) was asked to provide documentation of a completed competency checklist for Staff 17 (CNA), Staff 18 (CNA), Staff 26 (CNA), Staff 27 (CNA), and Staff 28 (CNA). On 11/6/24 at 10:00 AM Staff 1 provided completed competency checklists for Staff 17 and Staff 28. Staff 1 stated she did not have the requested completed competency checklists for Staff 18, Staff 26, and Staff 27.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the required annual CNA training and annual performance reviews were completed for 2 of 5 sampled CNA staff (#s 26 and 28) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs and lack of competent staff. Findings include: On 11/5/24 at 1:00 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) was asked to provide annual performance reviews and documentation of annual in-service training for Staff 26 and Staff 28. No annual performance reviews or in-service training documentation were provided for the identified staff members. On 11/6/24 at 10:00 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated in-service training was completed for CNA staff during staff meetings and via internet-based services. She stated she was recently hired and was not sure when or how evaluations were completed for staff. She acknowledged the identified CNA staff records did not show 12 hours of annual in-service training and did not include annual performance reviews. She stated the facility was not able to access the previous internet-based training…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was stored appropriately and was discarded in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident refrigerator reviewed for food storage and handling. This placed residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross-contamination. Findings include: On 11/4/24 at 11:34 AM the resident refrigerator located in the sunroom contained the following food items that were labeled with expired dates: - Applesauce was dated 10/28/24 (expired for 7 days). - A sandwich was dated 10/30/24 (expired for 5 days). - A dish of pineapple was dated 10/30/24 (expired for 5 days). - A plastic bag of carrots was dated 10/31/24 (expired for 4 days). On 11/4/24 at 11:46 AM Staff 23 (Dietary Manager) confirmed the food items should have been discarded by the expiration dates.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow infection control standards for 1 of 7 sampled residents (#27) reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for exposure and contraction of infectious diseases. Findings include: Resident 27 admitted to the facility in 2/2024 with a diagnosis of a fracture to the right hip. A 5/20/24 Nursing Note indicated Resident 27 discharged from the facility to the hospital because she/he had copious amounts of pus drainage from her/his surgical site. A 6/6/24 hospital transfer orders indicated Resident 27 had active infection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA, a bacterium which can cause serious infections in humans, is multi-drug resistant, and carriers could spread the infection even if they are not sick themselves). A 6/11/24 Nursing Note indicated Resident 27 had IV antibiotic treatment for an infected wound. No documentation was found in Resident 27's clinical record she/he was placed on precautions after readmitting to the facility on 6/6/24. On 7/25/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to accommodate resident needs for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 8 and 14) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for lack of independence. Findings include: 1. Resident 8 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body) and depression. On 11/5/24 at 2:38 PM Resident 8 complained she/he was moved to a different room because of a ceiling leak. She/he wanted to move back to the original room because that was where her/his adaptive equipment (trapeze and side rails) were installed to assist Resident 8 with bed mobility. When asked if there was adaptive equipment in her/his current room she/he replied, no it's in my old room. When asked how long she/he was without her/his adaptive equipment, she/he stated it was a few months. On 11/6/24 at 9:06 AM observation of Resident 8's previous room revealed the installed adaptive equipment. Observation of Resident 8's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of abuse for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#14) reviewed for abuse reporting. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 14 admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with diagnoses including arthritis and intervertebral disc degeneration (one or more discs in the spine deteriorate). A 5/30/24 MDS revealed Resident 14's BIMS score was 15 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. Review of a Complex Medical Add On note revealed on 7/14/24 Resident 14 tested positive for COVID-19 and refused to stay inside her/his room. On 11/5/24 at 11:58 AM Staff 25 (CNA) stated Staff 20 (Former Administrator) yelled at Resident 14 and there were other residents who also heard the yelling. On 11/6/24 at 9:42 AM Resident 14 stated in 7/2024 she/he tested positive for COVID-19. Staff paused the elevator operation so other residents did not come up the elevator while Resident 14 sat by the elevator, and staff went to get her/him a mask so she/he could go downstairs. Staff 20 came up the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#14) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 14 admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with diagnoses including arthritis and intervertebral disc degeneration (one or more discs in the spine deteriorate). A 5/30/24 MDS revealed Resident 14's BIMS score was 15 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. Review of a Complex Medical Add On note revealed on 7/14/24 Resident 14 tested positive for COVID-19 and refused to stay inside her/his room. On 11/5/24 at 11:58 AM Staff 25 (CNA) stated Staff 20 (Former Administrator) yelled at Resident 14. On 11/6/24 at 9:42 AM Resident 14 stated in 7/2024 she/he tested positive for COVID-19. Staff paused the elevator operation so other residents did not come up the elevator while Resident 14 sat by the elevator, and staff went to get her/him a mask so she/he could go downstairs. Staff 20 came up the stairs and saw Resident 14 and told her/him to go to her/his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received required assistance with ADLs for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#14) reviewed for ADLs. This placed resident at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 14 admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with diagnoses including arthritis and intervertebral disc degeneration (one or more discs in the spine deteriorate). A 5/30/24 MDS revealed Resident 14's BIMS score was 15 which indicated she/he was cognitively intact. A 11/6/23 care plan indicated Resident 14 had an ADL self-care performance deficit with interventions including she/he would activate her/his call light for assistance, and she/he required one-person assistance with most ADLs. On 11/6/24 at 9:42 AM Resident 14 stated Staff 13 (CNA) and Staff 19 (CNA) responded to her/his call light while her/his roommate was sleeping, so she/he told staff to keep quiet and to not turn on the light. Staff 13 and Staff 19 left the room. Resident 14 then waited another 45 minutes to an hour to receive assistance, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to respond to changes in condition and follow physician orders for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 4 and 29) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment and unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, constipation and chronic kidney disease. A review of the 10/2024 MAR revealed a physician order for Miralax to be administered if Resident 4 had no BM for three days. Resident 4 was noted to have no BM from 10/19/24 through 10/23/24; a period of five days. Resident 4 was administered Miralax on 10/24/24, day six, and it was noted to be effective. Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed the medication was not given in accordance with physician orders. 2. Resident 29 admitted to the facility in 9/2018 with diagnoses including dementia and UTI. A review of a 1/21/24 POLST revealed Resident 29's preference was limited treatment which included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain an environment free from accident hazards and to monitor a resident after a fall for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 6 and 18) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for accidents. Findings include: 1. Resident 6 admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with diagnoses including stroke. A review of Resident 6's care plan dated 6/2024 revealed Resident 6 was at risk for falls, with interventions including she/he was a high fall risk and to meet her/his needs. On 7/24/24 the State Survey Agency received a public complaint which indicated Resident 6 fell because the main entrance door did not work, and there was a sign to use the back door. The back door had a wheelchair ramp with no railing, and she/he fell and hurt her/his back and bruised her/his hip after the tire of her/his electric wheelchair slipped off the edge of the ramp. A 7/24/24 Fall investigation revealed at about 2:30 PM Resident 6 was found lying on the ground with her/his electric wheelchair next to her/his side. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pain medications as ordered for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#14) reviewed for pain management. This placed residents at risk for uncontrolled pain. Findings include: Resident 14 admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with diagnoses including arthritis and intervertebral disc degeneration (one or more discs in the spine deteriorate). A 11/6/23 Care plan indicated Resident 14 had chronic pain with interventions including to administer pain medications as ordered by the physician. A 2/2024 MAR instructed staff to administer Methadone (to treat moderate to severe pain) three times a day for chronic pain with a start date of 1/11/24. On 2/7/24 at 4:00 AM, 2/20/24 at 8:00 PM and 2/21/24 at 4:00 AM the MAR referred the reader to review Medication Administration Notes. A 2/7/24 Medication Administration Note indicated Methadone was not administered to Resident 14 because the facility was waiting on the delivery from the pharmacy. No documentation was found in Medication Administration Note for 2/20/24 why Resident 14 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide accurate and timely pharmaceutical services for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#14) reviewed for pain management. This placed residents at risk for medication errors. Findings include: Resident 14 admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with diagnoses including arthritis and intervertebral disc degeneration (one or more discs in the spine deteriorate). A 11/6/23 Care plan indicated Resident 14 had chronic pain with interventions including to administer pain medications as ordered by the physician. A 2/2024 MAR instructed staff to administer Methadone (to treat moderate to severe pain) three times a day for chronic pain with a start date of 1/11/24. On 2/7/24 at 4:00 AM, 2/20/24 at 8:00 PM and 2/21/24 at 4:00 AM the MAR referred the reader to review Medication Administration Notes. A 2/7/24 Medication Administration Note indicated Methadone was not administered to Resident 14 because the facility was waiting on the delivery from the pharmacy. No documentation was found in Medication Administration Note for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a follow-up dental appointment was made for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for dental. This placed residents at risk for dental pain. Findings include: Resident 18 admitted to the facility in 4/2023 with a diagnosis of diabetes. A 3/19/24 dental Clinical Notes Report revealed an oral exam was performed and findings included cavities. Recommendations included a referral for treatment and a full crown. A 5/15/24 Clinical Notes Report revealed Resident 18 was seen for a dental visit. X-rays were not able to be performed due to the resident's mental capacity. Resident 18's clinical record did not indicate she/he was referred to another dental provider. On 11/8/24 at 10:16 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated Resident 18 was not setup for a dental referral related to the treatment recommendations from the previous dental appointments.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' food preferences were honored for 1 of 3 sample residents (#14) reviewed regarding food. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: On 7/24/24 the State Survey Agency received a public complaint which indicated Resident 14 was not getting enough food and did not always get what other residents were served. On 11/6/24 at 9:42 AM and 1:13 PM Resident 14 stated the facility served their largest meal at lunch and in her/his culture the largest meal of the day was at dinner time. Resident 14 stated the facility did not provide choices during meals and residents received what was served. At times Resident 14 was served beets or Brussels sprouts, and she/he did not like those types of vegetables. Resident 14 stated when a request for a salad was honored it was very small and with hardly anything on the salad. Resident 14 received her/his lunch meal tray with mashed potatoes and gravy, vegetables, and a pork chop. Resident 14 stated the pork chop was dry. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accessible for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 11 and 18) whose records were reviewed. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 11 admitted to the facility in 6/2019 with diagnoses including blindness and dementia. On 8/1/24 the State Survey Agency received a public complaint which indicated Staff 20 (Former Administrator) disposed of residents' medical records which included tuberculosis (TB) testing records. The nurse had to re-do residents' TB testing. Resident 11 stated staff attempted to poke her/him to re-do the TB test. No documentation was found in Resident 11's clinical records she/he was offered or received TB testing prior to 6/2024. A review of Resident 11's Immunization Details revealed on 8/2/24 Resident 11 refused a TB skin test. On 11/5/24 at 12:31 PM Staff 9 (LPN) stated she remembered a concern with lost medical documents and having to re-do TB testing on some residents. On 11/8/24 at 11:57 AM Staff 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to timely obtain radiology services for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#300) reviewed for specialized medical appointments. This placed residents at risk for lack of radiology services. Findings include: A public complaint was received on 9/17/24 which alleged Resident 300 did not receive a timely radiology appointment. Resident 300 admitted to the facility in 9/2023 with diagnoses including spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal). On 9/19/24 at 11:28 AM Witness 1 (Complainant) stated Resident 300 had an order for a MRI (medical imaging used to take pictures of the body) for her/his left knee on 6/19/24, but the resident was not seen until 9/11/24 due to inaccurate facility documentation including no physician signature on the order, and what imaging the resident was to receive. Witness 1 stated the facility was called numerous times to update the order and add the physician signature, but there was lack of communication by the facility and the radiology appointment was delayed until 9/11/24. A 6/19/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow care plan interventions to ensure residents were free from physical abuse for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for physical abuse. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in June 2019 with diagnoses including dementia. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with diagnoses including dementia with agitation. Review of a progress note dated 7/17/23 at 4:45 PM, stated Resident 1 was observed to slap a resident on the left hand. Review of Resident 1's care plan updated 7/17/23, stated Resident 1 was to be at arms length away from other residents. Review of a facility investigation dated 7/21/23, stated Resident 1 had a history of striking out at other residents, verbal comments and aggression. The investigation indicated Resident 1's care plan would be updated to keep Resident 1 at arms length away from other residents and abuse was ruled out. Review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 7/24/23, stated on 7/23/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure an RN worked as the charge nurse for eight consecutive hours per day seven days per week for 64 of 81 days reviewed for RN coverage. This placed residents at risk for lack of RN oversight including resident assessment, care and services. Findings include: Review of the facility's Direct Care Staff Daily Reports revealed no designated RN coverage on the following dates: - 10/15/22 through 10/31/22 (16 days) - 11/15/22 through 11/27/22 (12 days) - 2/26/23 - 3/14/23, 3/15/23, 3/16/23, 3/18/23, 3/19/23, 3/20/23, 3/21/23, 3/22/23, 3/23/23, 3/24/23, 3/25/23, 3/27/23, 3/28/23, 3/29/23, 3/30/23 and 3/31/23 (16 days) - 7/1/23, 7/2/23, 7/3/23, 7/4/23, 7/5/23, 7/6/23, 7/7/23, 7/8/23, 7/9/23, 7/10/23, 7/13/23, 7/15/23, 7/16/23, 7/18/23, 7/19/23, 7/21/23, 7/22/23, 7/23/23 and 7/24/23 (19 days) On 7/27/23 at 8:38 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) confirmed the facility did not have the adequate RN coverage on the dates identified. He stated the facility used agency staff but they just did not have any RNs willing to go…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff annual performance reviews were completed for 4 of 5 CNA staff (#s 6, 7, 10 and 16) reviewed for sufficient staffing and abuse. This placed residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings include: The following CNA staff were reviewed for staff annual performance reviews: - Staff 6 (CNA) was hired on 4/19/17; - Staff 7 (CNA/CMA) was hired on 11/17/13; - Staff 10 (former CNA) was employed by the facility from 2015 through 11/2019; - Staff 16 (CNA) was hired on 12/4/18. On 7/25/23 at 8:59 AM Staff 6 stated she did not know how many training hours she had and said she thought Staff 1 (Administrator) or Staff 2 (DNS) tracked them. On 7/25/23 the personnel file of Staff 10 (former CNA) was requested. On 7/27/23 at 8:45 AM Staff 3 (Clinical Operations Education Director) stated the facility did not have a policy regarding the completion of annual performance reviews. On 7/28/23 at 3:15 PM she stated there was no documentation of staff training and there were no completed staff competencies or annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the Dietary Manager (DM) did not possess the required certification to provide DM services for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for qualified dietary staff. This placed residents at risk for unmet dietary needs. Findings include: On 7/27/23 at 8:07 AM documentation was requested regarding the dietary certification of Staff 12 (Dietary Manager). On 7/27/23 at 8:07 AM Staff 12 stated the facility was cited the previous year by the State Agency regarding the lack of a certified dietary manager. Staff 12 stated she needed to file an extension because she did not complete the training to be certified.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on immediate jeopardy situations and the number of citations including deficient practice in the areas of resident rights, freedom from abuse, comprehensive assessments and care planning, quality of care, nursing services, food and nutrition services, and QAPI and training requirements, it was determined the facility was not managed in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This resulted in two immediate jeopardy situations and substandard quality of care. Findings include: 1. Residents 11, 19 and 20 were not assessed, offered or assisted to make advance care planning decisions. Refer to F578 2. The facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment. Refer to F584 3. The facility failed to prevent verbal abuse, determine staff eligibility for hire, address abuse policies and concerns with the QAPI Committee, report potential abuse or neglect and thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for Residents 6, 20, 179 and 180.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-02 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) program that identified quality deficiencies and develop and implement action plans to correct identified quality deficiencies. The facility failed to conduct an analysis of quality data, design interventions, test those interventions, and determine if the desired outcome was achieved or sustained. This failed practice placed all residents at risk for not receiving the care and services necessary for optimal resident outcomes. Findings include: An 4/2014 facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan revealed: The objectives of the QAPI Plan are to provide structure and processes to correct identified quality and/or safety deficiencies; establish and implement plans to correct deficiencies, and to monitor the effects of these action plans on resident outcomes. The QAPI Committee shall meet monthly to review reports, evaluate the significance of data, and monitor quality-related activities of all departments, services, or committees. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-02 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) program which systematically identified issues related to infection control, nursing care and services, sufficient RN nursing staff and to ensure that improvements were realized and sustained. Two immediate jeopardy situations were identified with coincident identification of substandard quality of care. Findings include: On 7/31/23 at 2:51 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated the facility had a program to collect infection information but the data was not shared because no QAPI meeting occurred in over a year. On 8/2/23 at 10:07 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated he and Staff 2 were aware staff education was lacking. Staff 1 did not provide any documents related to a QAPI plan or meetings. Staff 1 acknowledged there was no follow-up to any QAPI process that was to start after the 2022 annual survey, and corrections were not implemented or maintained. Refer to F684, F698 and F835

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-02 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determine the facility failed to have a quality assessment and assurance committee that met and which included required members to systematically identify issues. This placed all residents at risk. Two immediate jeopardy situations were identified with coincident identification of substandard quality of care. Findings include: A 6/30/23 Facility Assessment indicated the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) committee last reviewed the document on 3/22/22. On 7/31/23 at 3:39 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated there was no working document related to QAPI issues the facility identified, the Medical Director was only available through video and did not attend any QAPI meetings, and QAPI meetings were informal and only involved discussions between Staff 1 and Staff 2 (DNS). Refer to F867

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-02 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have an effective training program for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for training. This placed residents at risk for untrained staff. Findings include: On 8/2/23 at 8:15 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) was asked to provide staff training records related to Resident Rights, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, the QAPI program and the Infection Control program. On 8/2/23 at 9:34 AM Staff 3 (Clinical Operations Education Director) stated she could find only a couple trainings offered and there were no additional trainings located specific to the requested training records.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-02 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff completed the required 12 hours annual training for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for CNA staff training and performance reviews. This placed residents at risk for untrained CNAs. Findings include: On 8/2/23 at 8:15 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) was asked to provide staff training records related to Resident Rights, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, the QAPI program and the Infection Control program. On 8/2/23 at 9:34 AM Staff 3 (Clinical Operations Education Director) stated she could find only a couple trainings offered and there were no additional trainings located.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for 2 of 2 halls reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for an unclean and non-homelike environment. Findings include: Observations made during the week of 7/24/23 through 7/29/23 revealed 2 of 2 carpeted hallways had multiple dark brown and black areas. There were also dark brown and black spots on the carpet in the entryways and resident rooms. On 7/28/23 at 9:00 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the carpets were old, had stains and needed to be replaced.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-02 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively assess 4 of 8 sampled residents (#s 2, 20, 24 and 129) reviewed for medications and nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including weakness and history of falls. The 3/10/23 admission MDS CAA for ADLs included the following: - This care area was triggered because the resident required assistance with activities of daily living from staff. A care plan would be initiated because the resident required staff assistance with most activities of daily living related to limited mobility. The Fall CAA included the following: - This care area was triggered because the resident had previous falls and was at risk for a fall that can subject the resident to an injury. A care plan would be initiated because the resident was at risk for a fall or injury from possible side effects of the medication. On 7/27/23 at 10:08 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services in accordance with physician orders for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 14, 20 and 130) reviewed for respiratory services. This placed residents at risk for unmet respiratory needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease). A 5/31/23 Discharge Order revealed Resident 14 had no orders for oxygen equipment. The 7/2023 MAR revealed no orders for oxygen therapy or oxygen equipment maintenance and cleaning. A 7/25/23 Safety Event-Fall Report indicated Staff 5 (LPN) completed the report and Resident 14's oxygen saturations were at 96 percent with a two liter flow of oxygen after a fall. On 7/25/23 at 11:01 AM and 7/26/23 at 11:15 AM Resident 14 was observed sleeping in bed with a nasal cannula (tubing) and the use of two liters per minute (LPM) of continuous oxygen. On 7/26/23 Staff 6 (CNA) stated she could provide Resident 14 up to two LPM of oxygen as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to serve food in a sanitary manner and keep refrigerators and the ice machine clean for 1 of 1 kitchen observed. This placed residents at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings include: On 7/24/23 at 12:35 PM the refrigerator in the main kitchen was observed with multiple rusted wire racks. A head of purple cabbage was on the top shelf placed directly on the refrigerator's wire rack. On 7/26/23 the following occurred: -11:28 AM Staff 12 (Dietary Manager) stated the rusty refrigerator shelves were usually taken out each year and sprayed with a rubberized material which was not completed this year. -11:36 AM the floor around the drain pipe running from the ice machine to the floor was covered in dust, debris and build up. The linoleum flooring was peeled away from the floor. There was black mildew was on the inside of the ice machine door and when in the open position the mildew hung from the door approximately a quarter of an inch. -11:39 AM Staff 12 confirmed the ice machine door required cleaning. -11:48 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-02 · tag F0843 — pattern
    Have an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to make a good faith effort to obtain a transfer agreement with the local hospital(s) for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for transfer agreements. This place residents at risk for delayed transfers. Findings include: On 8/1/23 Staff 1 (Administrator) was asked to provide a transfer agreement with the local hospital(s). On 8/2/23 9:34 AM Staff 1 stated he could not locate any transfer agreements and was not aware if any were pursued.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow infection control procedures for vital sign machines and implement a water management plan for 4 of 4 rooms during random observations and 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination and communicable diseases. Findings include: 1. On 7/31/23 at 2:51 PM Staff 29 (CMA) was completing blood pressure and oxygenation checks in rooms 11, 12, 14 and 15. Staff 29 was stopped before entering room [ROOM NUMBER] due to not sanitizing the equipment after each use. On 7/31/23 at 2:59 PM Staff 29 acknowledged she did not sanitize the blood pressure cuff or oxygen saturation monitor after each resident in the above rooms. Staff 29 stated there were no sanitizing wipes on the vital sign cart. 2. The 7/2023 Scheduled Maintenance log indicated general facility water temperatures were monitored monthly. No information related to the analysis of potential areas of growth and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-02 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determine the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection control. This place residents at risk for developing antibiotic resistance. Findings include: A 7/27/23 Infection Surveillance Report dated from 6/1/23 through 7/24/23 revealed a list of facility residents who received specific antibiotics for a variety of infectious diseases and symptoms but no labs or cultures were listed. On 7/31/23 at 2:51 PM Staff 2 (DNS/IP) stated it was difficult to obtain data related to residents' lab results before physician prescribed antibiotics and no physician was involved in the antibiotic stewardship program. Staff 2 stated he was the only one who looked at the available antibiotic usage data, his monitoring of facility infections was based solely on each resident's infectious disease title, and acknowledged the antibiotic stewardship program and monitoring of antibiotic usage in the facility was incomplete.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess immunization status and provide vaccines for 5 of 5 sampled residents (#s 5, 6 14, 18 and 20) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for illnesses and being uninformed about vaccinations. Findings include: A 3/2022 facility Pneumococcal Vaccine policy indicated residents were to be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series and offered within 30 days of admission. The 2/2023 CDC Pneumococcal Vaccination website, section titled Pneumococcal Vaccination, indicated the following: - Vaccines help prevent pneumococcal disease which is any type of illness caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria. There are two kinds of pneumococcal vaccines available in the United States: * Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV13, PCV15 and PCV20) * Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) - CDC recommends pneumococcal vaccination for adults [AGE] years old and older; On 7/28/23 at 8:45 AM an undated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow up regarding advance directives for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 11, 19 and 20) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for not having their healthcare wishes honored. Findings include: 1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including kidney disease. On 5/23/23 at 5:47 PM a Social Service note indicated Resident 11 read and signed an Advance Directive form. A 5/31/23 Care Conference note indicated Resident 11 elected to be full code (wished to receive life-saving measures if found without a pulse) on her/his POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) form. On 7/26/23 at 9:02 AM Resident 11 stated she/he did not complete an Advance Directive but rather completed a POLST form. Review of the medical record revealed no information related to follow-up regarding an Advance Directive. On 7/26/23 at 10:08 AM Staff 34 (Social Service Director) stated she reviewed advanced directives with residents upon admission as part of the admission packet.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify a physician regarding medication refusals and errors for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#20) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of physician oversight. Findings include: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including weakness, history of falls and gastric intestinal metaplasia (precancerous change of the mucosa in the stomach). The 5/25/23 through 6/24/23 MAR indicated Resident 20 refused medications or medications were unavailable for the following: -metformin (for diabetes) 12 times -metoclopramide (for reflux disease)10 times -metoprolol (for Blood pressure) seven times -pantoprazole (for gastric issues) five times -potassium chloride (for low potassium) nine times -Thermotabs (For low sodium) seven times and unavailable 10 times -cymbalta (antidepressant) unavailable three times -hydralazine (for blood pressure) 10 times -levothroxine (for thyroid) two times The 7/1/23 through 7/25/23 MAR indicated Resident 20 refused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a written grievance resolution or communicate with a resident or resident's representative regarding the resolution of a resident grievance for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#129) reviewed for grievances. This placed residents at risk for unaddressed concerns and grievances. Findings include: Resident 129 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including heart attack. On 12/15/22 a public complaint was received which indicated Resident 129 expressed concerns about nursing staff behavior during a care conference on 9/29/22. Resident 129 expressed concerns that the nurses were mean to her/him, and Resident 129 started to cry during the meeting. Resident 129 stated staff said mean things and insisted her/his requests be made earlier in the evening. The complaint also reported Resident 129 did not feel safe in the facility. The DNS was notified and wrote down what Resident 129 reported. On 7/28/23 at 10:58 AM Staff 34 (Social Services Director) stated Resident 129 brought up some concerns during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from verbal abuse by staff and physical abuse by a resident for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 6 and 179) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for verbal and physical abuse. Findings include: The facility's undated Abuse/Neglect Prevention, Reporting and Investigation policy revealed the facility would .not permit residents to be subjected to abuse or neglect by anyone, including staff, residents .or any other individual that comes into the facility. 1. Resident 179 was admitted to the facility in 2019 with diagnoses including Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection (MRSA) and bilateral leg amputations. Resident 179's 10/2019 Quarterly MDS revealed she/he had a BIMS score of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment. The facility's 11/26/19 abuse investigation revealed Staff 10 (former CNA) and Staff 14 (former RN) attempted to transfer Resident 179 to her/his bed when Staff 10 told Resident 179 We are going to put you to bed and you are going to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolated
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview the facility failed to ensure staff were employable for 1 of 6 staff (#10) reviewed for personnel files. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: On 7/25/23 at 3:08 PM Staff 10's (former CNA) personnel file was requested from Staff 1 (Administrator) as a result of a staff to resident verbal abuse allegation. On 7/26/23 at 1:40 PM Staff 17 (Regional Director of Operations) stated Staff 10's personnel file was in a storage unit offsite. Staff 1 confirmed the file was in an offsite storage unit. On 7/31/23 at 12:26 PM Staff 1 stated he could not find Staff 10's file. No documentation was provided to confirm Staff 10 was employable by the state licensure agency.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement abuse policies and failed to address abuse with the QAPI committee for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 6 and 180) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse by staff and other residents. Findings include: The facility's undated Abuse/Neglect Prevention, Reporting and Investigation policy revealed .we protect our residents from all issues of abuse through facility preventative measures. It is our policy that all allegations of abuse be reported and thoroughly investigated ., and .will not permit residents to be subjected to abuse or neglect by anyone, including staff, residents or any other individual that comes into the facility. On 12/26/22 Resident 180 was found by facility staff with bruising over her/his eyebrow. Resident 180 was unable to state how she/he sustained the injury. A thorough investigation was not completed and abuse was not ruled out. The facility did not report the injury of unknown origin to the state agency. On 2/19/23 staff witnessed Resident 8 approach…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#180) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for being abused, sustaining injury and unmet care needs. Findings include: The facility's undated Abuse/Neglect Prevention, Reporting and Investigation policy revealed All incidents of skin condition changes are investigated by the RCM or the DNS for potential abuse or neglect, and .If abuse canot be reasonably ruled out as a cause, then it must be reported . 1. Resident 180 was admitted to the facility in 2012 with diagnoses including diplegia of upper limbs (a form of paralysis affecting both arms) and cervical spinal cord injuries affecting multiple vertebrae. Resident 180's 11/4/22 Quarterly MDS revealed she/he had a BIMS score of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident 180 was assessed to need extensive assistance with dressing and total assistance with eating and personal hygiene. A 12/26/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#180) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for being abused, sustaining injury and unmet care needs. Findings include: The facility's undated Abuse/Neglect Prevention, Reporting and Investigation policy revealed All incidents of skin condition changes are investigated by the RCM or the DNS for potential abuse or neglect, and .If abuse canot be reasonably ruled out as a cause, then it must be reported . Resident 180 was admitted to the facility in 2012 with diagnoses including diplegia of upper limbs (a form of paralysis affecting both arms) and cervical spinal cord injuries affecting multiple vertebrae. Resident 180's 11/4/22 Quarterly MDS revealed she/he had a BIMS score of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident 180 was assessed to need extensive assistance with dressing and total assistance with eating and personal hygiene. A 12/26/22 progress note revealed Resident 180 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement a baseline care plan for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#405) reviewed for catheter care. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident 405 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart disease. A 9/26/23 review of Resident 405's clinical record revealed no baseline care plan. On 9/27/23 at 3:38 PM Staff 5 (LPN) stated the admission process for Resident 405 was never completed, there was no baseline care plan for Resident 405 and she was asked to complete a care plan on 9/27/23. On 9/27/23 at 4:13 PM Staff 3 (Clinical Operations Education Director) stated the new admission process was not completed for Resident 405. Staff 3 acknowledged Resident 405 had no baseline care plan.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for 2 of 5 of sampled residents (#s 20 and 129) reviewed for accidents and change of condition. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including weakness and respiratory failure. The 6/14/23 care plan did not address resident 20's ADLs or transfer status. On 7/27/23 at 10:08 AM Staff 3 (Regional operations Education Director) acknowledged Resident 20's care plan did not address her/his ADLs or transfer status. 2. Resident 129 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including heart attack. A 7/4/22 admission MDS indicated Resident 129 received anticoagulant therapy. An 10/4/22 signed physician order instructed staff to administer Eliquis (a blood thinner). A review of Resident 129's 10/13/22 care plan did not identify the use of a blood thinner or interventions. On 7/31/23 at 11:22 AM Staff 3 (Clinical Operations Education Director) confirmed there was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to update care plans for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 20 and 26) reviewed for accidents and UTIs. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including a history of falls and respiratory failure. A 3/15/23 progress note revealed Resident 20 returned to the facility after a 3/14/23 fall with a diagnosis of a broken leg. The 6/14/23 revised care plan indicated the resident had a history of falls, would not sustain any further falls, and to place frequently used items within reach of the resident. The revised care plan did not include interventions in place after the 3/14/23 fall related to Resident 20's transfer status or nursing and personal care related to her/his broken leg. On 10/27/23 at 10:08 AM Staff 3 (Clinical Operations Education Director) acknowledged Resident 20's revised care plan did not include interventions related to the fall with fracture. 2. Resident 26 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received required assistance with ADLs for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#26) reviewed for UTI. This placed resident at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 26 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including stroke and diabetes. A 7/2023 MAR instructed staff to complete diabetic nail care by a nurse weekly as needed. On 7/10/23 it was documented unable to complete. On 7/17/23 it was documented not needed at this time. On 7/24/23 it was documented as completed. On 7/24/23 at 1:46 PM Resident 26 stated she/he had to ask for a washcloth to wash her/his hands and one was not provided at every meal. There was no sink in her/his room. On 7/27/23 at 1:56 PM, 7/28/23 at 8:00 PM and 7/31/23 at 8:56 AM Resident 26 was observed to have dark brown debris under her/his nails with nails approximately 1/2 inch beyond fingertips. On 7/31/23 at 10:17 AM light brown discoloration was observed under Resident 26's nails and her/his nails were approximately 1/2 inch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to properly assess, follow physician orders and provide adequate catheter care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#26) reviewed for UTI. This placed residents at risk for unmet catheter needs. Findings include: Resident 26 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including UTI. A 5/5/23 admission Observation revealed Resident 26 had a urinary catheter. A review of the 5/6/23 baseline care plan revealed Resident 26 required a urinary catheter. A signed 5/8/23 Order Communication Form requested removal of Resident 26's urinary catheter, monitor for urinary retention, insert straight catheter (intermittent catheter removed after each use) as necessary and replace urinary catheter if the resident was unable to void. A 5/2023 review of Point of Care History document revealed Resident 26 had a urinary catheter in place from 5/6/23 through 5/21/23. A 5/9/23 admission MDS CAA indicated Resident 26 was frequently incontinent of bladder and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain healthy parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#129) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for weight loss. Findings include: Resident 129 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including muscle weakness, and vitamin D and B12 deficiencies. A 6/27/22 admission Observation revealed no concerns with dental, had upper and lower dentures, dentures were in good repair and in the resident's possession. Resident 129 had expressive dysphasia (affects speech and language output). The diet slip was sent to dietary and orders faxed to the pharmacy. A 7/4/22 admission MDS indicated Resident 129 had broken or loosely fitting dentures and weighed 158 pounds. The Nutritional CAA indicated the CAA was triggered because Resident 129 was potentially at risk for nutritional deficit because of weakness, confusion and pain. A care plan would be initiated because the resident was at potential risk for a nutritional deficits. Additionally the CAA referred the reader…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were seen as required by a physician for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 20 and 24) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet medical needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including falls and respiratory failure. Records revealed Resident 20 had in-person physician visits on 4/7/23, 5/5/23 and 7/14/23. The were no in-person physician visits in 6/2023. On 8/2/23 at 9:56 AM Staff 3 (Regional operations Education Director) confirmed resident 20 was not seen in-person by a physician in 6/2023. 2. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression. Record review revealed the resident did not see her/his physician within 40 days from time of admission. On 8/2/23 at 9:14 AM Staff 3 (Clinical Operations Education Director) confirmed Resident 24 was not seen by a physician within the required timeframe.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 5 and 18) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medication. Findings include: 1. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (a type of progressive dementia that leads to a decline in thinking, reasoning and independent function), chronic congestive heart failure and conversion disorder with seizures (a condition causing physical and sensory problems such as paralysis, numbness, blindness, deafness or seizures with no neurologic pathology). Resident 5 had a long list of allergies which included many medications. The 5/11/23 Quarterly MDS revealed Resident 5 had a BIMS score of 14 indicating no cognitive impairment. The 7/2023 MAR revealed an entry for the medication sertraline (used to treat depression) 150mg with instructions to administer one capsule once a day with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' food preferences were honored for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#129) reviewed regarding food preferences. This placed residents at risk for unmet dietary preferences. Findings include: Resident 129 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including muscle weakness, and vitamin D and B12 deficiencies. A 6/27/22 admission Observation and Notes revealed Resident 129's diet slip (a form to communicate physician prescribed dietary needs) was sent to dietary. A 6/27/22 through 11/27/22 review of Resident 129's clinical record found no documented food preference assessment. A 11/4/22 Physician Progress Note indicated on 10/27/22 and 10/28/22 Resident 129 expressed she/he did not like meat but was served warmed tuna fish for dinner. An undated diet card revealed Resident 129 was on a heart-healthy mechanical soft diet and was allergic to nuts and tuna. Resident 129 disliked all meats, corn, peas and green beans. On 7/31/23 at 2:42 PM Staff 12 (Dietary Manager) stated the facility normally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 3 of 8 sampled residents (#s 18, 26 and 129) reviewed for change of condition, dialysis and medications. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate care. Findings include: 1. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including acute kidney failure. a. On 7/24/23 at 1:43 PM Resident 26 stated she/he had one dialysis port that was not taken out and it was not working. Resident 26 reported she/he went to dialysis one time. Resident 26 stated she/he was in pain and had bruising from the procedure. On 7/25/26 6:54 AM Staff 8 (CNA) stated Resident 26 went to dialysis and was not in the facility. On 7/27/23 at 8:12 AM Staff 20 (CNA) stated Resident 26 was picked up at 4:45 AM every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday for dialysis. On 7/27/23 at 8:24 AM a note was observed on a CNA clipboard at the nurses' station which indicated Resident 26 was transported to dialysis between 4:45 AM and 5:45 AM. On 7/28/23 at 2:04 PM Witness 6 (Dialysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a hospice agreement was in place with a hospice provider for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#4) reviewed for hospice services. This placed the resident at risk for unmet hospice care needs. Findings include: Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 2016 with diagnoses including dementia, Alzheimer's disease and muscle weakness. Resident 4's 2/19/23 Quarterly MDS revealed she/he received hospice services while she/he was a resident in the facility. Resident 4's revised 5/30/23 Care Plan revealed she/he received hospice services with a start date of 5/15/21. There was no evidence in the resident's record of a hospice agreement with the facility. On 7/26/23 at 1:03 PM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed Resident 4 received hospice services and added hospice staff visited Resident 4 weekly. On 7/26/23 at 2:45 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated the facility did not have a hospice contract, but Resident 4 received Hospice services at the facility for two years.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SAPPHIRE HEALTH SERVICES — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BECKER, ANDREWIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST30%since 01/20/2023
HILTY, LISAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 01/20/2023
MORRIS, BRYANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 01/20/2023
RICKER, KEVINIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST40%since 01/20/2023
SAPPHIRE HEALTHCARE SRVS.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
NASHAWI, MHD TAREKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
VANCE, NATHANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
MYRTLE POINT HC INVESTORS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/27/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-27.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$116K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 49%Medicare 5%Other / private 45%

This home reported $116K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$448per resident / day
operating cost
$13,607per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$352per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385254. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next