Tigard Rehabilitation And Care
14145 SW 105th Avenue, Tigard, OR 97224 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 112 certified beds · (503) 639-1144 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $69,509 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-11)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.7% | 14.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 13.3% | 4.7% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.8% | 2.0% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.2% | 4.9% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 2.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.9% | 20.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.7% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.2% | 5.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.0% | 21.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.8% | 13.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.4% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.9% | 81.2% | 79.4% | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.6%CMS range 32.7–64.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.9–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 65.8 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.22 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the community use glucometer was properly sanitized between resident use for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 9 and 53) reviewed for infection control during CBG checks. This failure, determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation, placed all residents who required CBG checks at significant risk for bloodborne illness. On 5/6/26 the facility was informed of the IJ situation and provided a copy of the IJ template. Findings include:The True Metrix Blood Glucose System manufacturer instructions indicated to disinfect the meter with EPA-registered wipes between each resident. The 7/2023 facility policy for Glucometer Disinfection indicated to disinfect the glucometer after each individual patient use with EPA registered wipes. On 5/6/26 at 7:39 AM Staff 3 (RN) was observed to obtain a CBG for Resident 53 in the resident's room using a True Metrix Blood Glucose System glucometer. Staff 3 exited the room, placed the glucometer on the cart and did not disinfect the glucometer. Continuous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure foods and fluids were served in a manner to prevent accidental choking for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 28 and 30) reviewed for accidents. This failure, determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy situation (IJ), resulted in Resident 30 choking after the resident received food of the wrong texture. This failure also placed other residents at risk for choking and lack of oxygen. It was determined the IJ began on 3/26/26. On 5/6/26 the facility was notified of the IJ situation and was provided a copy of the IJ template. Findings include: a. Resident 30 admitted to the facility in 1/2026 with diagnoses including stroke and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). A 1/23/26 admission MDS indicated Resident 30 had a BIMS score of 8 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident had a swallowing disorder including coughing or choking during meals. A review of Resident 30's progress notes revealed on 2/8/26 at 9:00 AM the resident was given sausage for breakfast. Resident 30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to professional standards related to disinfection of common use glucometers, following physician orders, unnecessary medications, and infection control during wound care for 1 of 1 licensed nurse (Staff #3) reviewed for infection control and medication administration. This placed residents at risk for bloodborne illness, uncontrolled hypertension, and hypoglycemia. Findings include: 1. The True Metrix Blood Glucose System manufacturer instructions indicated to disinfect the meter between each person with EPA-registered wipes. The 7/2023 facility policy for Glucometer Disinfection indicated to disinfect after each individual patient use with EPA registered wipes. On 5/6/26 at 7:39 AM Staff 3 (RN) was observed to obtain a CBG for Resident 53. Staff 3 exited the room, placed the glucometer on the cart and did not disinfect it. Continuous observations were made between 7:39 AM and 7:59 AM of Staff 3 completing other nursing tasks. On 5/6/26 at 7:59 AM Staff 3 gathered supplies…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate medication storage temperatures were logged and maintained, failed to ensure proper labeling of biologicals and failed to ensure a medication cart was properly secured for 1 of 1 medication refrigerator, for 1 of 3 treatment carts and 1 of 4 medication carts reviewed for safe medication storage. This placed residents at risk for receiving medications with reduced efficacy and unauthorized access to medications. Findings include: 1. On 5/6/26 at 7:51 AM one open, undated vial of tuberculin (used for testing in the diagnosis of Tuberculosis) was observed in the medication room refrigerator.The manufacturer's instructions indicated to discard the medication 30 days after opening.On 5/6/26 at 7:51 AM Staff 3 (RN) acknowledged the vial of tuberculin was open and not labeled with an open date.On 5/6/26 at 8:17 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated the expectation was for open medications to be labeled with open dates.2. On 5/6/26 at 8:17 AM the medication room refrigerator was observed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was the determined the facility failed to ensure staff wore hair restraints for 1 of 1 Staff (#6) reviewed for kitchen. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination. Findings include: The facility's 2001 Food Preparation and Service Policy indicated food and nutrition service staff were to wear hair restraints (hair net, hat, beard restraint, etc.) so that hair did not contact food.On 5/4/26 at 10:10 AM Staff 6 (Cook) was observed in the kitchen at the counter prepping food wearing a bandana around her head and her hair in a clip. Staff 6's hair was not fully covered, and she was not wearing a hair restraint.On 5/4/26 at 10:11 AM Staff 6 acknowledged she was not wearing a hair restraint. Staff 7 (Dietary Manger) stated staff were to wear hair restraints and acknowledged Staff 6 was not wearing a hair restraint.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess the appropriateness and effectiveness of psychotropic medication use for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings include: Resident 5 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder.Review of Resident 5's physician orders indicated the use of Abilify (antipsychotic) and bupropion (antidepressant) for bipolar disorder.A 10/16/25 Psychoactive Drug Review indicated Resident 5 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and was administered Abilify and bupropion. The review indicated no changes were recommended and her/his depressive symptoms were to be monitored and reassessed the following month.Review of Resident 5's medical record indicated no psychoactive drug review was completed after 10/16/25.On 5/6/26 at 11:45 AM Staff 8 (SSD) stated psychoactive drug reviews…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were individualized for 1 or 1 sampled resident (#42) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs and receiving non-individualized care interventions. Findings include: Resident 42 was admitted to the facility in 1/2023 with diagnoses including urinary incontinence.Resident 42's 1/22/26 Annual MDS revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact, and the resident was always incontinent of bladder and bowel.Resident 42's 2/6/26 care plan identified the resident had episodes of bladder incontinence r/t limited mobility, and cognitive impairment and included the intervention to Ensure resident has bedside urinal within reach, Encourage usage, Check and empty at regular intervals.Observations from 5/4/26 through 5/6/26 between the hours of 11:50 AM and 4:30 PM revealed no urinal cup was present at Resident 42's bedside.An interview on 5/6/26 at 4:33 PM, Resident 42 stated she/he never had a urinal at bedside and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to clarify and follow physician orders for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#42) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). This placed residents at risk for unmet needs and uncontrolled hypertension. Findings include:Resident 42 was admitted to the facility in 1/2023 with diagnoses including Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure and Stage 1 Through Stage 4 Chronic Kidney Disease. (High blood pressure that has caused damage to the heart and kidneys, including heart failure and chronic kidney disease ranging from mild to severe stages).Resident 42's 1/22/26 Annual MDS revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 42's 7/21/24 Physician Order indicated Obtain BP (Blood Pressure) see PRN Hydralazine order for DBP (Diastolic Blood Pressure) greater than 90 and SBP (Systolic Blood Pressure) greater than 140 three times a day.Resident 42's 2/1/24 Physician Order indicated Hydralazine HCl Oral Tablet 25 MG (Hydralazine HCl), give 25 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain and prevent a potential decrease in ROM or mobility for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#49) reviewed for positioning and mobility. This placed residents at risk for loss of ROM and mobility. Findings include:Resident 49 was admitted to the facility in 11/2024 with diagnoses including muscle wasting atrophy (a condition of thinning muscle tissue, resulting in weakness).A 11/14/25 Occupational Therapy Discharge Summary indicated Resident 49 was to participate in a restorative range of motion program to maintain the highest level of function for the resident's upper extremities.A 11/16/25 Annual MDS indicated Resident 49 had range of motion impairment to both upper and lower extremities on one side and required minimal assistance with upper body dressing.A 2/16/26 Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 49 had range of motion impairment to both upper and lower extremities on one side and required substantial/maximal assistance with upper body dressing.A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to administer insulin as ordered for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk of receiving unnecessary medication. Findings include:A 2/20/26 physician order indicated the use of Novolog insulin. The order indicated 2 units of insulin was to be given before meals and was only to be administered if the CBG (capillary blood sugar) was greater than 150.Review the 4/2026 and 5/2026 DAR (Diabetic Administration Record) indicated from 4/1/26 to 5/6/26, Resident 5 was administered 2 units of insulin a total of 55 times when her/his blood sugars were below 150.Staff 3 (RN) was noted to have administered insulin one or more times to Resident 5 when her/his blood sugar level were under 150 for the following dates:4/17/264/24/265/1/265/6/26Staff 4 (LPN) was noted to have administered insulin one or more times to Resident 5 when her/his blood sugar level were under 150 for the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were kept secured and confidential for 2 of 2 random observations. This placed residents at risk for lack of privacy and confidentiality. Findings include: 1. On 5/6/26 continuous observations were made from 11:14 AM to 11:42 AM of the 100 hall medication cart, it was left unattended and the computer screen was open and displayed Resident 41's name, date of birth and medication administration information.On 5/6/26 at 11:42 AM Staff 2 (DNS) acknowledged the medication cart was left unattended and the computer screen was open and displayed information including Resident 41's name, date of birth and medication administration information. Staff 2 stated the computer screen was supposed to be locked when the cart was unattended.2. On 5/8/26 continuous observations were made from 9:04 AM to 9:06 AM of the 200 hall medication cart, it was left unattended and the computer screen was open and displayed Resident 30's name, date of birth and medication administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to offer and obtain consent prior to administration of influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 11 and 28) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for pneumonia and being uninformed of the risks and benefits of vaccination. Findings include:A review of the revised 3/2022 facility Pneumococcal Vaccine policy for residents revealed the following:All residents are offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections.-Before receiving a pneumococcal vaccine, the resident or legal representative receives information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal vaccine.A review of the revised 3/2022 facility Influenza Vaccination policy for residents.-All residents and staff are encouraged to receive the vaccine unless there is a medical contraindication and providing education about the risk and benefits of vaccination.1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with a diagnosis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the COVID-19 vaccine for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 11 and 62) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for COVID-19 illness. Findings include:Review of the CDC's Staying Up To Date with COVID-19 Vaccines, dated 11/19/25, https://www.cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/stay-up-to-date.html, documented CDC recommends a 2025-2026 COVID-19 vaccine for people ages 6 months and older based on individual-based decision-making.Getting the 2025-2026 COVID-19 vaccine is especially important if you. are living in a long-term care facility.1. Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with a diagnosis of Parkinsonism.A review of Resident 11's immunization record revealed Resident 11 was not offered the COVID-19 vaccine.On 5/7/26 at 2:01 PM Staff 14 (Corporate IP) stated Resident 11 was eligible for the COVID-19 vaccine, but it was not offered to the resident. 2. Resident 62 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with a diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the vertebrae.A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure non-pressure skin wounds were monitored for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for non-pressure skin wounds. This placed residents at risk for worsening wounds and delays in treatment. Findings include:Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure and diabetes.A 4/17/25 Clinical admission Progress Note, completed by Staff 4 (LPN), indicated Resident 6 had some redness with a small healing blister to her/his front left knee that was present upon admission.The 4/18/25 care plan revealed Resident 6 had impaired skin integrity due to a current blister on the left thigh/shin and immobility.A review of Resident 6's medical record, including a review of the 4/2025 TAR, revealed no assessment of the wound and no monitoring of the wound. Resident 6 discharged to the hospital on 4/22/25 for an unrelated diagnosis.On 11/13/25 at 2:45 PM Staff 4 confirmed he completed Resident 6's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure newly identified pressure ulcer wounds were comprehensively assessed and wound care orders were obtained and implemented for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#7) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers. Findings include:The facility's 4/2018 Pressure Ulcer/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol - Assessment and Recognition specified the nurse shall describe and document/report the following:Full assessment of pressure sore including location, stage, length, width and depth, presence of exudates (leaking fluid) or necrotic (dying/dead) tissue and pain assessment.The 2019 National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries Quick Reference Guide indicated the following recommendations regarding pressure ulcer assessment: - Assess the pressure ulcer initially and re-assess it at least weekly to monitor progress towards healing; - Document the results of all wound assessments; - Assess and document physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure narcotic drug records were in order and an account of all controlled drugs was maintained for 1 of 3 narcotic books reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for drug diversion. Findings include:The facility's policy for reconciling controlled substances, revised 11/2022, stated the system for reconciling the receipt, dispensing and disposition of controlled substances included the following:-Records of personnel access and usage;-Medication administration records;-Declining inventory records; and-Destruction, waste and return to pharmacy records.-Nursing staff count controlled medication inventory at the end of each shift, using these records to reconcile and inventory the count. The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty make the count together and document and report any discrepancies to the DNS.A 3/27/25 FRI indicated narcotic medication for two residents was missing and unaccounted for.A 3/31/25 investigation report revealed the facility was unable to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident 5 admitted to the facility in 2011 with diagnoses including anxiety, mood and personality disorder. The 7/20/23 Care Plan indicated Resident 5 had behaviors of refusing cares, refusing all wound cares and other cares including bathing and hygiene tasks. Resident 5 was not easily directed and interventions by staff escalated the resident's agitation. Resident 5 had history of being verbally and physically aggressive toward staff. Interventions included: to not argue with the resident and to discontinue attempts to treat if she/he became agitated and reapproach later. A 1/6/25 Facility Reported Incident indicated the following:- - On 1/4/25 Resident 5 told Staff 21 (RN) to go to Hell when attempting to complete wound care. Staff 21 was heard by CNA Staff reply to Resident 5, I'm already in Hell. You're Satan's bitch, aren't you? Staff 21 also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure refrigerator temperatures were monitored, and food was labeled and dated for 2 of 2 refrigerators reviewed for food storage. This placed residents at risk for potential foodborne illnesses. A review of the facility policy Refrigerator and Freezer policy revealed refrigerator and freezer temperatures were to be checked daily and all food items were to be marked with dates. Responsibility for implementating the policy was assigned to supervisors or their designee. On 1/13/25 at 8:25 AM the refrigerator used to store resident food items, located in the resident dining room, was observed to have a temperature recording log, however, the temperature was only recorded on 1/10/25. On 1/14/25 at 1:09 PM Staff 16 (Dietary Manager) stated he was not aware of the process for monitoring the resident foods refrigerator utilized by the care team. He stated he had taken the temperature of the refrigerator on 1/10/25 when he placed the log on the front of the refrigerator. On 1/15/25 at 9:59 AM foods were observed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received communication in a language they could understand for 1 of 1 resident (#52) reviewed for behavior. This placed residents at risk for lack of involvement in care. Findings include: Resident 52 admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes. A 10/12/24 admission MDS revealed Resident 52's preferred language was Spanish and she/he needed an interpreter to communicate with health care staff. A 10/28/24 care plan revealed Resident 52 spoke Spanish. A review of the medical record revealed the following English language documents were issued to and signed by Resident 52: - 10/14/24 Portable Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST), - 10/22/24 Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage, - 10/29/24 Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage, - 1/9/25 SNF Discharge Instructions/Recapitulation of Stay. On 1/14/25 at 11:52 AM Witness 2 (Complainant) stated she visited with Resident 52 and she/he complained the facility provided documents to her/him in English only and requested she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident mail was delivered to residents on Saturdays for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for resident council. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely written communication. Findings include: A facility Mail and Electronic Communication policy, revised in 2017, stated, Mail and packages will be delivered to the resident within twenty-four (24) hours of delivery on premises or to the facility's post office box (including Saturday deliveries). During the resident council meeting on 1/14/25 at 2:00 PM residents stated their mail was not delivered to them on Saturdays. On 1/15/25 at 10:04 AM Staff 20 (Activities Director) stated mail was delivered Monday through Friday only. Staff 20 stated mail delivered to the facility on Saturdays was not given to resdients until the next Monday morning. On 1/15/25 at 11:31 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) stated resident mail was to be delivered to the residents on the same day it was delivered to the facility.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#52) reviewed for behavior. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 52 admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes. An 10/16/24 Utilization Review assessment revealed Resident 52 had chronic suicidal ideation comments. An 10/26/24 Progress Note revealed Resident 52 yelled and swung at staff, was combatiative, and refused to have her/his vitals done. A 11/5/24 Progress Note with a licensed clinical social worker revealed Resident 52 was referred to her by the facility for a depressed mood. Resident 52 expressed feeling depressed following recent medical complications and loss of independence, had depressed mood, sadness, feelings of helplessness, difficulties concentrating, and some irritability. Resident 52 expressed recent suicidal ideation with no intent or plan. A review of Resident 52's medical record revealed no monitoring for mood or behaviors. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide care to wounds for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#52) reviewed for non-pressure skin wounds. This placed residents at risk for worsening wounds. Findings Include: Resident 52 admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes. An 10/5/24 hospital progress note revealed Resident 52 had a a right foot ulcer. An 10/8/24 Clinical admission revealed a right lateral (outer edge) foot diabetic foot ulcer was identified. Daily Skilled Evaluations completed 10/9/24 through 10/18/24, 10/20/24 through 11/1/24, 11/4/24, and 11/5/24, identified Resident 52's right lateral foot diabetic ulcer was not evaluated. 10/14/24, 10/17/24, 10/25/24, 11/1/24, and 11/19/24 Physician Progress Notes revealed no information related to Resident 52's right lateral foot diabetic ulcer. A 11/21/24 Skin Check assessment revealed Resident 52 was identified to also have a venous ulcer (a chronic wound that occurs when blood pools in the veins of the legs, damaging the skin and causing an open sore) on the left front…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed after weight loss was identified for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 34) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk continued weight loss. Findings include: Resident 34 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malnutrition and type 1 diabetes. The 8/13/24 Care Plan indicated Resident 34 had a nutritional problem related to ongoing malnutrition and weight loss since admit. The goal was for Resident 34's weight to be within acceptable parameters set by the RD and Interdisciplinary team. Interventions included distant supervision, high protein foods and supplements. Review of Resident 34's Weight Summary report indicated the following: - 6/25/24 weight of 200.6 pounds. - 7/10/24 through 9/4/24 weight averaging 205.5 pounds. - 9/16/24 no weight taken. - On 9/23/24 Resident 34's weight was 174.6 pounds (32.5-pound weight loss). On 9/26/24 a progress note indicated the identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNAs received annual performance reviews for 4 of 4 randomly selected CNA staff (#s 7, 8, 9 and 10) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of care by competent staff. Findings include: On 1/14/25 at 1:30 PM Staff 2 (DNS) was asked for the annual performance reviews for Staff 7 (CNA), Staff 8 (CNA), Staff 9 (CNA), and Staff 10 (CNA). No performance reviews were provided. On 1/15/25 at 10:40 AM Staff 15 (Staffing Coordinator) acknowledged no performance reviews were completed for the identified CNA staff.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for dignity and respect. This placed residents at risk for a decrease in their quality of life. Resident 2 admitted to the facility in 11/2023, with diagnoses including hyperlipidemia (a condition caused by high levels of fat in the blood). Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 2/2024, with diagnoses including chronic systolic heart failure. A 7/17/24 Facility Reported Incident indicated Resident 1 was observed having a verbal altercation with Resident 2 in the facility parking lot. It was reported the altercation began after Resident 2 requested Resident 1 to return a spare wheelchair that Resident 1 had borrowed. Resident 1 during the verbal altercation was observed spitting in Resident 2's face before staff intervened and separated both residents. A 7/17/24 witness statement by Staff 3 (Medical Records Director) and Staff 4 (ADNS) indicated Resident 1 spat in the face of Resident 2 during the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from sexual abuse for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for potential repeat sexual abuse incidents. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 11/2023, with diagnoses including severe sepsis and post-traumatic stress disorder. A 11/8/23 admission MDS Assessment, Section C: Cognitive Patterns, identified Resident 1 with severe cognitive impairment. Resident 1's 11/17/23 Care Plan identified the resident with a history of trauma related to domestic violence with interventions, including maintaining personal space boundaries and announcing self before approaching. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 8/2023, with diagnoses including encephalopathy and dementia with behavioral disturbance. An 11/24/23 Quarterly MDS Assessment, Section C: Cognitive Patterns, identified Resident 2 with severe cognitive impairment. Resident 2's 8/18/23 Care Plan identified the resident with inappropriate sexual behavior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to treat a diabetic wound per physician orders for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for worsening wounds. Findings include: Resident 8 admitted to the facility in 5/2023, with diagnosis including diabetes. Resident 8's 10/10/23 physican orders instructed staff to clean the right toe diabetic wound with wound cleanser, apply a thin layer of AD (ointment) to the wound and periwound, and to secure the wound with bordered foam. The dressing was to be changed three times per week and as needed. Resident 8's October 2023 TAR revealed no wound care was done between 10/11/23 through 10/27/23. On 4/10/24 at 11:15 AM, Staff 2 (DNS) verified wound treatments were not completed from 10/11/23 through 10/27/23.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow resident care plans related to substance use disorder for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 2) reviewed for safety and coordination of care. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder and stimulant abuse. An 11/1/23 admission MDS identified Resident 2 had no cognitive impairment. Resident 2's Care Plan dated 11/1/23 revised on 11/14/23 indicated resident 2 had an active substance use disorder characterized by the resident's continued pursuit to obtain illegal substances from outside sources. This act was identified to place Resident 2 at risk for further injury to her/himself. An 11/27/23 Nursing Care Note identified Resident 2 was unarousable while care staff attempted to provide catheter care. Resident 2's head was positioned in a downward angle. Care staff contacted emergency care services and resident 2 was noted to have refused to be transferred to the hospital. An 11/28/23 Provider Note indicated after the emergency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess and develop individualized interventions specific to the expression to continue using illegal substances for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#2) reviewed for behavioral emotional health. This placed residents at risk for a decline in mood and potential risk for reduced quality of life. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder and stimulant abuse. Resident 2's Care Plan dated 11/1/23 revised on 11/14/23 indicated resident 2 had an active substance use disorder characterized by the resident's continued pursuit to obtain illegal substances from outside sources. This act was identified to place Resident 2 at risk for further injury to her/himself. Resident 2's 11/1/23 Care Plan identified the facility was to provide Resident 2 with continued resources related to drug addiction counseling. On 12/4/23 at 12:19 PM Staff 4 (SSD) stated Resident 2 declined the offer of drug support services and counseling. Staff 4 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete nurse aide training performance reviews every 12 months and provide regular in-service training based on the outcome of these reviews for 1 of 1 CNA (#12) reviewed for annual nurse aide training performance. This placed residents at risk for lack of care by competent staff. Findings include: On 8/8/23 a review of the facility's staff training records for CNAs employed over one year revealed the following: -Staff 12 (CNA), hired 6/15/22, had no performance review and no documentation of regular in-service training. On 8/10/23 at 1:02 PM Staff 16 (Clinical Operations Education Director) confirmed the facility did not have a system in place to conduct annual nurse aide training performance reviews for Staff 12.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a safe and sanitary environment for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for food service. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: 1. Observations from 8/9/23 at 9:53 AM through 8/10/23 at 9:40 AM revealed the ceiling of the kitchen had three round uncovered air vents (approximately 12 inches in diameter) which all had surrounding areas which were blackened colored, jagged, had hanging loose debris and were blowing air over the food prep area and serving areas. On 8/9/23 air was observed blowing over the food service area during the lunch meal service. On 8/9/23 at 2:09 PM Staff 6 (Dietary Manager) stated the missing vent covers were being cleaned and painted. 2. On 8/9/23 between 11:49 AM and 12:30 PM during lunch meal service observations Staff 7 (Cook) did not change her gloves or conduct hand hygiene after touching multiple surfaces in the kitchen, including the food prep areas and utensils. Staff 7 used the same gloved hand to handle rolls and sandwiches…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-11 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have the Medical Director or designee attend the QAA (quality assessment and assurance) committee for 2 of 3 quarters reviewed for QAA. This placed residents at risk of not receiving care and services for optimal resident outcomes. Findings include: Documentation of QAA meeting minutes were requested from 1/2023 through 8/2023 and the only documentation provided was the sign in sheets from 4/2023 and 8/2023 which revealed the Medical Director attended on 4/21/23 but did not attend on 8/8/23. No other documentation was provided. On 8/11/23 at 12:01 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 21 (DNS) stated they held monthly QAA meetings and all major department supervisors attended. Staff 1 and Staff 21 stated the Medical Director did not attend the Quarterly QAA meetings on a regular basis but was highly encouraged to attend. Staff 1 stated she could not find any documentation from 1/2023 through 3/2023 the Medical Director attended the quarterly QAA meetings.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
1. Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a water management program and conduct a risk analysis assessment for potential areas of growth and spread of water-borne pathogens and illness. This placed all residents at risk for exposure to water-borne pathogens. Findings include: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Safety and Oversight Group letter 17-30, revised on 7/6/18, on Requirement to Reduce Legionella Risk in Healthcare Facility Water Systems to Prevent Cases and Outbreaks of Legionnaires' Disease stated, Facilities must develop and adhere to policies and procedures that inhibit microbial growth in building water systems that reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in water. A review of the current Facility Assessment revealed no evidence a risk assessment had been completed and there was no information referring to a facility policy or procedure to prevent the growth and spread of water-borne pathogens in the facility's main…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for 1 of 1 courtyard areas reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for accidents. Findings include Observations from 8/8/23 through 8/10/23 revealed no safety warnings or other cautionary measures in place for a broken and raised section (two to three inches) of a pathway in the courtyard. On 8/8/23 at 12:23 PM Resident 15 was observed in her/his wheelchair in the courtyard. The resident had difficulty navigating the broken section of the pathway. The resident was unable to crossover the broken pathway and appeared to be stuck. On 8/9/23 at 10:03 AM Resident 15 stated that she/he went outside daily and regularly got stuck on the broken section of the pathway. She/he then stated staff would usually notice or Resident 15 would use her/his cell phone to call for help. On 8/9/23 at 10:48 AM Staff 5 (Maintenance Director) stated he was aware of the broken section of the pathway in the courtyard. He further stated he had only been at the facility approximately one month…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. There were 28 medication administration opportunities with 8 errors resulting in an error rate of 28%. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings include: The undated facility policy for care of tube feeding (gastrostomy) indicated the following: 5.e. Medications will be administered by gravity. If problems with gravity and administration occur, a very small amount of pressure with the syringe to attempt flow and then remaining administration will be by gravity, unless otherwise noted by the physician. Resident 9 admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses including stroke. The 7/27/23 Physician Order indicated Resident 9 was to receive the following medications: -acetaminophen 500 mg 2 tabs via gastric tube TID; -docusate sodium (laxative) 100 mg via gastric tube BID; -ezetimibe (cholesterol medication) 10 mg via gastric tube once daily; -ferrous sulfate (supplement) 325/65 mg via gastric tube once daily;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure hot food was served at preferable temperatures for 1 of 1 lunch meal reviewed for food concerns. This placed residents at risk for inadequate food temperatures. Findings include: On 8/7/23 interviews with Residents 39 and 297 revealed meals were often served cold. When meals were received, the hot foods were usually cold and had to be warmed up. A review of Resident Council minutes from 4/2023 through 7/2023 revealed cold food was an ongoing concern. The Resident Council minutes did not document actions taken to address the cold food. On 8/9/23 a lunch meal test tray was requested by the survey team. During the lunch meal service a total of 49 minutes passed between the first meal tray being placed in the first meal cart to when the survey team received the lunch meal test tray. The lunch meal consisted of roasted pork loin and broccoli. Both items were determined to be lukewarm in temperature. On 8/9/23 at 1:33 PM Staff 8 (Activities Director) stated cold food was an ongoing concern…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the garbage area dumpsters were covered for 1 of 1 facility garbage areas reviewed for sanitation. This placed residents at risk for exposure to pests and rodents. Findings include: Observations of the facility garbage dumpster were made on 8/7/23 and 8/9/23 through 8/11/23. The garbage dumpster was located outside of the facility kitchen. The garbage dumpster was left open despite having covers. A strong odor was noticeable from the open trash dumpster. From 8/9/23 to 8/11/23 there were multiple bags of trash inside the dumpster. On 8/9/23 at 2:09 PM the observations of the uncovered garbage dumpster were shared with Staff 6 (Dietary Manager). Staff 6 stated he was unaware the garbage dumpster was uncovered. On 8/10/23 at 10:05 AM Staff 1(Administrator) was informed of and shown the uncovered garbage dumpster. She stated she was not aware the garbage dumpster was to be covered at all times.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to track annual nurse aide training (required 12-hour minimum every year) for 5 of 5 sampled CNAs (#s 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15) reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of care by competent staff. Findings include: On 8/8/23 a review of the facility's staff training records revealed the following: -Staff 11 (CNA), hired 3/27/23 had no documentation they completed 12 hours of in-service training. -Staff 12 (CNA), hired 6/15/22 had no documentation they completed 12 hours of in-service training. -Staff 13 (CNA), hired 10/14/22 had no documentation they completed 12 hours of in-service training. -Staff 14 (CNA), hired 1/5/23 had no documentation they completed 12 hours of in-service training. -Staff 15 (CNA), hired 2/1/23 had no documentation they completed 12 hours of in-service training. On 8/8/23 at 9:06 AM Staff 16 (Clinical Operations Education Director) confirmed the facility was unable to provide documentation to verify any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to offer the resident the opportunity to participate in the care planning process for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#19) reviewed for care planning. This placed residents at risk for not being involved in the care planning process. Findings include: Resident 19 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder. On 8/7/23 at 10:11 AM Resident 19 stated she/he would like to attend her/his care conference and did not recall attending one in the past. On 8/8/23 Resident 19's medical record was reviewed and revealed no care conferences were completed since she/he admitted to the facility. On 8/8/23 at 11:03 AM Staff 3 (Social Services Director) acknowledged Resident 19 did not have a care conference completed since she/he admitted to the facility on [DATE].
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures regarding residents' rights to formulate an Advance Directives for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#14) reviewed for Advanced Directives. This placed residents at risk for not having their health care preferences honored. Findings include: A record review on 8/7/23 revealed no advance directive or documentation to indicate Resident 14 was informed of or provided written information concerning their right to formulate an advance directive. On 8/9/23 at 2:33 PM Resident 14 stated she/he completed an Advance Directive during her/his hospital stay prior to admission. On 8/10/23 at 11:34 AM Staff 3 (Social Services) stated the facility provided an Advanced Directive form to Resident 14 upon admission. Staff 3 (Social Services) confirmed the facility did not follow up to ensure a copy of the Advance Directive was obtained and placed in the medical record.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non Coverage) and SNF ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage) information for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 247 and 248) reviewed for beneficiary notification. This placed residents at risk for unknown financial liabilities. Findings include: Resident 247 admitted to the facility with Medicare Part A services on 1/19/23. The last day of coverage for skilled services was 2/13/23. Resident 247 remained in facility. A review of the medical record revealed no evidence a NOMNC was provided to Resident 247 when skilled services ended. Resident 248 admitted to the facility with Medicare Part A services on 1/20/23. The last day of coverage for skilled services was 3/3/23. The resident remained in the facility until 5/5/23. A review of the medical record revealed no evidence SNF ABN was provided to Resident 248 when skilled services ended. On 8/8/23 at 11:57 AM Staff 3 (Social Services Director) was unable to find the required beneficiary forms for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow and implement physician orders and provide bowel medication in a timely manner for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 26 and 43) reviewed for medications and tube feeding. This placed residents at risk for medical complications from constipation and adverse side effects of medications. Findings include: The facility's undated Bowel Care Protocol indicated if a resident did not have a BM (bowel movement) in 72 hours a licensed nurse was to perform an abdominal assessment and offer Miralax (a laxative) in eight ounces of liquid. It was okay to use the Miralax on top of existing Miralax order, if it existed. If there were no results in 24 hours they were to notify the physician. For any resident on narcotics, request an order for scheduled or PRN stool softeners or Miralax. 1. Resident 26 admitted to the facility on 8/2022 with diagnoses including dementia and depression. a. Resident 26's Physician Order Report signed by the physician on 7/28/23 revealed an order for Miralax powder. Staff were to administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure elopement interventions were in place for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#26) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for lack of supervision and increased elopement risk. Findings include: Resident 26 admitted to the facility in 8/2022 with diagnoses including dementia and depression. A review of Resident 26's clinical record from 4/11/23 through 7/13/23 revealed the resident wandered throughout the halls and facility with the use of her/his walker, entered other residents rooms and at times, was difficult to redirect. Resident 26's Physician Order Report signed by the physician on 7/13/23 revealed the resident was an elopement risk with a start date of 6/5/23 and her/his elopement precautions was to make sure the resident had her/his name band on at all times and staff were to document her/his whereabouts and if the resident was exhibiting exit seeking behavior. A review of Resident 26's 7/2023 and 8/2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure records were complete and accurate for 3 of 6 sampled residents (#s 7, 14 and 44) reviewed for medications and death. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate medical records. Findings include: 1. Resident 44 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, chronic pulmonary disease and diabetes. A review of Resident 44's [DATE] admission orders revealed she/he was coded a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) and no CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) was to be initiated. A signed copy of Resident 44's [DATE] POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) revealed she/he was a [Full Code] and to initiate CPR. A [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE] Late Nursing Note entry indicated Resident 44's code status: DNAR - No CPR. Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (allow natural death). A [DATE] Nursing Noted indicated Staff 25 (LPN) around 2200 hours found Resident 44 unresponsive with no pulse or respirations. After finding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$69,509 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $14,175 — penalty dated 2026-05-11
- $19,620 — penalty dated 2026-05-11
- $35,714 — penalty dated 2025-04-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SAPPHIRE HEALTH SERVICES — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BECKER, ANDREW | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 30% | since 12/13/2022 |
| HILTY, LISA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 12/13/2022 |
| MORRIS, BRYAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 12/13/2022 |
| RICKER, KEVIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 40% | since 12/13/2022 |
| SAPPHIRE HEALTHCARE SRVS. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/23/2025 |
| LARSON, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2023 |
| ZHENG, JEFFREY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/10/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $252K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OR
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385272. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.