No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cedar Crossings

6003 SE 136th Avenue, Portland, OR 97236 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 89 certified beds · (971) 978-1268 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609) — most recent May 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$32,383 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $32,383 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-17)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
14601 SE Division Street · (888) 875-7820 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
12710 SE Division St · (503) 988-3410 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Park
5708 SE 136th Ave · (503) 665-5519 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
6030 SE 136th Ave · (425) 778-9615

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.0%14.9%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.7%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.9%4.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.7%20.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.7%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.1%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.9%5.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.2%21.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.6%13.9%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine76.7%81.2%79.4%typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 96 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.2%CMS range 29.7–51.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 7.8–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.3–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
1.25
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.56
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.24
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
64.5%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 78.6 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.46 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-22)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

57 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to re-evaluate elopement risks and modify care plan interventions after ongoing elopement attempts and exit seeking behaviors for a resident with cognitive impairment and inability to effectively communicate her/his needs due to aphasia and CVA. This failure, determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation, resulted in Resident 1's elopement from the facility on 6/12/24 and placed residents at risk for an unsafe elopement. Findings include: The facility's 3/2019 Wandering and Elopement policy indicated the facility would identify residents at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. The resident's care plan was to include strategies and interventions to maintain the resident's safety. Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 4/2024, with diagnoses including stroke, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and aphasia (a language disorder which causes difficulty speaking). Resident 1's 4/2024 admission MDS: Section C - Cognitive Patterns and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision and implement fall interventions to prevent a resident fall with injury for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in Resident 1 requiring hospitalization and placed all residents at risk for falls. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2/2023 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (chronic heart condition), Stage IV chronic kidney disease and a history of right lower leg amputation. The facility's Personal Care Assistant Policy included the following information: On the Floor: Personal Care Assistants will be assigned to a Mentor CNA on all shifts and work as a team to provide care to both the Personal Care Assistant's and the Mentor CNA's section. Resident 1's 2/14/23 admission MDS revealed a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact) and she/he had a fall with a fracture within the past six months prior to admission to the facility. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper labeling of biologicals for 1 of 2 medication rooms, and failed to ensure medication and medication carts were properly secured for 4 of 4 random observations of medication carts reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for reduced efficacy of medication and unauthorized access to medications. Findings include:1. On 5/20/26 continuous observations were made from 11:44 AM to 11:49 AM of the medication cart on [NAME] Hall. The cart was observed to be unlocked and unattended. On 5/20/26 at 11:49 AM Staff 4 (CMA) acknowledged the medication cart was unlocked, unattended and contained resident medications. On 5/22/26 at 10:05 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated the expectation was for medication carts to be locked when unattended.2. On 5/21/26 continuous observations were made from 1:01 PM to 1:02 PM of the medication cart on [NAME] Hall. The cart was observed to be unlocked and unattended.On 5/21/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#44) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for an unsafe and unkempt physical environment. Findings include:Resident 44 admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with diagnoses including schizophrenia. Maintenance requests reviewed from 3/2026 to 5/2026 indicated there was no damaged furniture in Resident 44's room that required repairment. On 5/18/26 at 2:20 PM the closet in Resident 44's room was observed to have a broken bottom drawer, which was unsecured on the bottom level of the closet and no longer attached to the frame. On 5/21/26 at 10:50 AM Staff 14 (CNA) stated she was aware Resident 44's closet had a broken bottom drawer. Staff 14 stated the drawer was broken for approximately six weeks.On 5/21/26 at 11:11 AM Staff 15 (Maintenance Director) stated nursing staff were expected to complete an electronic maintenance request when they were aware of damaged furniture in a resident's room. Staff 15 stated he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure gradual dose reductions were completed when indicated for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects of psychotropic medication. Findings include: Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility in 3/2026 with diagnoses including depression and insomnia.Resident 1 had a physician order dated 3/27/26 for trazodone 50 mg. The order indicated, Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for insomnia, which was discontinued on 4/6/26. A new physician order dated 4/6/26 for trazodone 50 mg stated, Give 50 mg by mouth at bedtime related to depression.Resident 1's MAR indicated the medication was documented as administered to Resident 1 from 4/6/26 through 5/21/26.Resident 1's 4/21/26 Psychoactive Drug Review indicated the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) recommended a gradual dose reduction (GDR) to decrease trazodone from 50 mg to 25 mg and to change the diagnosis for use of trazodone from insomnia to depression. The review indicated the physician verbally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#40) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet basic care needs. Findings include:Resident 40 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness and the need for assistance with personal care.A review of Resident 40's record revealed the baseline care plan was not completed until 4/14/26; 13 days after admission.On 5/22/26 at 9:24 AM Staff 12 (LPN Resident Care Manager) stated upon admission the charge nurse initiated the baseline care plan which included a residents ADLs and expected it to be completed within 72 hours of the resident's admission.On 5/22/26 at 10:36 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated a baseline care plan included information about the resident's ADLs, nutrition, skin, pain, and fall risk. Staff 2 stated she expected the baseline care plan to be completed within 48 hours of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received an assistive device to maintain vision ability for 1 of 1 resident (#48) reviewed for vision. This placed residents at risk for increased visual deficits. Findings include:Resident 48 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses including diabetes and hypertension.The 4/21/25 Care Plan indicated Resident 48 had a vision deficit related to decreased visual acuity. Interventions included ensuring eyeglasses were clean, appropriate and being worn.A 12/9/25 provider vision progress note indicated an eye exam was completed for an evaluation of cataract with blurry vision to both the right and left eye. The evaluation indicated glasses were prescribed and would be shipped to the facility two weeks from receipt of payment.On 5/18/26 at 1:44 PM and 5/21/26 at 1:52 PM Resident 48 stated she/he saw the eye doctor in January and received a new prescription for glasses but hadn't received any glasses yet. Resident 48 stated she/he could barely see out of the glasses she/he currently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident narcotic drug records were in order and an account of all controlled drugs was maintained for 1 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate clinical records related to narcotics and drug diversion. Findings include:1. On 5/20/26 at 9:06 AM the [NAME] Hall Controlled Substance Book was reviewed with Staff 6 (LPN). There were no signatures observed for the 5/20/26 day shift controlled medication count. Staff 6 stated she did not count the controlled medications with another staff before coming on shift.On 5/20/26 at 7:05 PM Staff 5 (LPN) stated he worked night shift on 5/19/26 and did not count controlled medications with staff before leaving the facility.On 5/21/26 at 1:30 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated the expectation was for two staff to count controlled medications between shifts, compare them to the Controlled Substance Book and sign the signature page…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pharmacist recommendations were addressed for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 1 and 10) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for receiving ineffective or unnecessary medications. Findings include:1. Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility in 3/2026 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe) and depression.A pharmacist recommendation dated 4/17/26 for Resident 1 indicated, This resident is currently receiving the antipsychotic medication Abilify (aripiprazole) for a diagnosis noted on the MAR of depression. Would recommend monitoring for movement disorders such as Extrapyramidal Side Effects and Tardive Dyskinesia with AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) testing upon initiation of antipsychotic medications, and also during dosage changes and then every 6 months. I was unable to locate in the chart where AIMS testing had been completed.A second pharmacist recommendation dated 5/9/26 included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were kept secured and confidential for 2 of 2 random observations. This placed residents at risk for lack of privacy and confidentiality. Findings include: 1. On 5/21/26 continuous observations were made from 1:01 PM to 1:02 PM of the medication cart on [NAME] Hall. The cart was observed to be unattended, the computer screen was open and displayed resident information.On 5/21/26 at 1:02 PM Staff 10 (LPN) acknowledged the medication cart was left unattended and the computer screen displayed resident information.On 5/22/26 at 10:05 AM Staff 2 (DNS) stated the expectation was for staff to lock the computer screen when the computer was unattended.2. On 5/22/26 at 9:49 AM the [NAME] Hall medication cart was observed to be unattended, the computer screen was open and displayed resident information. Staff 11 (RN) was observed to enter a resident's room.On 5/22/26 at 9:49 AM Staff 11 returned to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff were aware of residents who were an elopement risk and aware of elopement care plan interventions for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for elopement. This placed residents at risk for elopement. Findings include:Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 1/2025 with diagnoses including dementia with anxiety, bilateral hearing loss and cataracts.Resident 1's 5/21/25 Care Plan indicated Resident 1 was at risk for elopement due to her/his poor cognition. Interventions included frequent monitoring and visual checks by staff and to ensure staff were aware of the resident's wander risk. Resident 1 was also care planned for bilateral hearing loss, visual impairment and frequent falls. Resident 1's 6/17/25 Progress Notes indicated the following:-At 1:51 PM, Resident 1 displayed exit seeking behavior and was to be closely monitored.-At 2:20 PM, CMA was instructed to administer an anxiety pill to Resident 1 for anxiety and exit seeking.-At 11:41 PM, Resident 1 eloped from facility; last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean and homelike environment on 1 of 1 facility and 1 of 2 resident dining rooms reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for tripping and living in an unkept and unhomelike environment. Findings include: 1. The facility's Homelike Environment Policy dated February 2021 outlined the following: - Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Observations of the facility's dining rooms, hallways and resident rooms from 1/14/25 through 1/17/25 between the hours of 7:30 AM and 2:00 PM found the following issues: -The flooring in the ECU (Enhanced Care Unit) dining room had an irregular half-circular portion of linoleum, approximately 9 inches long, 4 inches wide and 1.5 inches deep, missing on the left side of the dining room near the exit door which was a tripping hazard. In addition, there was approximately 5 feet in length of flooring with missing pieces of linoleum in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 45 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff completed timely smoking assessments and smoking materials were stored safely for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 22, 50, and 60) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for accidents and smoking hazards. Findings include: A Smoking Policy dated 8/2022 revealed the following: -Resident smoking status is evaluated upon admission to ensure all residents are safe to smoke. -A resident's ability to smoke safely is re-evaluated quarterly, upon a significant change (physical or cognitive) and as determined by staff. -No resident will be allowed to store any smoking materials in their room. All smoking material will be stored in a secured designated area (a lock box) accessible only to staff. If any smoking materials are seen on residents, please report to nurse or the social worker. -If it is believed that residents are not compliant with locking up smoking materials and have them in their possession the IDT (interdisciplinary team) will be notified. IDT members will work…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure residents attained or maintained their highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being for 5 of 9 sampled residents (#s 2, 8, 22, 26 and 57) reviewed for call light wait times and staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of ADL care needs. Findings include: a. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility in 2/2023 with diagnoses including morbid obesity and diabetes. On 1/13/25 at 10:34 AM, Resident 26 stated call light response times took 45 minutes. Resident 26 stated she/he needed assistance with ADL care. Resident 26's call light response logs from 1/1/25 through 1/14/25 revealed six times when the the response time was 16 to 30 minutes, and six times when the response time was greater than 30 minutes. b. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility in 10/2024 with diagnoses including morbid obesity and right leg lower amputation. On 1/13/25 at 1:00 PM, Resident 22 stated she/he needed assistance to change her/his brief and staff could take 30 minutes or up to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure each CNA received annual performance reviews for 5 of 5 randomly selected CNAs (#s 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18) reviewed for staffing. This failure placed residents at risk for lack of care by competent staff. Findings include: On 1/16/25 at 1:00 PM, Staff 2 (DNS) was asked for the annual performance reviews for Staff 14, Staff 15, Staff 16, Staff 17, and Staff 18. A review of the personnel profile records for Staff 14, Staff 15, Staff 16, Staff 17, and Staff 18 revealed no annual performance reviews were completed. On 1/16/25 at 1:22 PM, and 1/17/25 at 1:23 PM, Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 2 were present for an interview. Staff 2 stated if there was nothing located in the personnel profile folders, the annual performance reviews were not completed. Staff 1 and Staff 2 acknowledged the annual performance reviews were not completed for Staff 14, Staff 15, Staff 16, Staff 17, and Staff 18.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were secured and not expired for 3 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication effects. Findings include: The facility's Storage of Medication Policy, dated [DATE], states the facility drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments, drugs with missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels would be returned to the pharmacy, and discontinued or outdated drugs would be returned or destroyed. On [DATE] at 5:26 AM, during an observation of the [NAME] Hall diabetic/treatment cart assisted by Staff 23 (LPN) the following items were identified: -Naloxone Nasal Spray Pharmacy Label had an expiration date of [DATE]. -Lantus (Glargine) insulin vial was opened. No open date was written on the supplied label. The pharmacy fill date was [DATE]. This type of insulin had a 28-day use by date after opening. -An unlabeled and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide care and treatment for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#56) reviewed for edema. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 56 was admitted to the facility in 11/2024 with diagnoses including deep vein thrombosis (a blood clot that may cause pain and swelling) in the lower left leg, atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate), and high blood pressure. On 1/13/2025 at 10:37 AM, Resident 56 stated she/he had discomfort to her/his legs due to swelling. The resident was observed to have edema (swelling) in both feet. The resident stated a provider had ordered compression stockings for the edema about four weeks earlier but she/he did not receive the compression stockings. Compression stockings were not observed on her/his lower extremities. On 1/16/25 at 12:07 PM, Staff 20 (RN) stated she was not aware of an order for compression stockings for Resident 56; however, she was able to locate an order for Tubigrip (a form of compression dressing) in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident respiratory services were in place and equipment was maintained for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#54) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for breathing complications. Findings include: Resident 54 was admitted to the facility in 5/2024 with diagnoses including anxiety and depression. A care plan dated 5/24/24, revealed Resident 54 had sleep apnea and utilized a CPAP/BIPAP machine. The device was to be cleaned, including the mask, tubing and head gear. Random observations from 1/13/25 through 1/17/25 revealed Resident 54 utilized a BIPAP (a ventilator that helps people breathe by delivering pressurized air through a mask) machine adjacent to her/his bed on a nightstand. The BIPAP machine was dusty, and the tubing and mask were in a drawer covered with magazines and under a saltine cracker box. On 1/13/25 at 8:08 AM, and 11:38 AM, and on 1/17/25 at 8:17 AM, Resident 54 stated she/he utilized a BIPAP machine at night. Resident 54 stated staff did not clean…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to administer medications and ensure communication forms were completed accurately for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#50) reviewed for dialysis (a procedure which removes waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning properly). This placed residents at risk for lack of care and services, and potential medication side effects. Findings include: Resident 50 was admitted in 6/2024 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and diabetes. a. A care plan dated 8/12/24 and revised on 1/17/25 revealed Resident 50 received dialysis related to renal failure. Resident 50 went out for dialysis at 5:00 AM on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday and returned at 2:00 PM. A review of Resident 50's Physician Recapitulation Orders dated 12/8/24, revealed the following medications to be administered in the morning at 7:00 AM or 7:30 AM: *Midodrine (a cardiovascular agent) 5 mg, administer every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday 20 minutes prior to dialysis to treat hypotension.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pharmacist recommendations were addressed for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#66) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for receiving ineffective or unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident 66 was admitted to the facility in 9/2024 with diagnoses including insomnia. The 11/2024 Monthly Pharmacist Review of Resident 66's medication regimen revealed the following: -On 11/27/24 the pharmacist's recommendation advised the prescriber to reassess Resident 66's Melatonin 1 mg at bedtime (helps regulate sleep) and determine if the resident would benefit from an increase to 3 mg due to Resident 66 sleeping between one and four hours per night. Resident 66's clinical record revealed no indication the pharmacist's recommendation to increase the resident's Melatonin was addressed. On 1/15/25 at 11:42 AM Staff 4 (RNCM) reported she did not receive any follow up to Resident 66's 11/27/24 pharmacist recommendation to increase the resident's Melatonin from 1 mg to 3 mg. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide dental services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#36) reviewed for dental care needs. This placed residents at risk for unmet dental needs. Findings include: Resident 36 was admitted to the facility in 1/2024 with diagnoses including dysphagia (inability to chew and swallow safely) and pneumonitis (inflammation of the lung tissue) due to inhalation of food and vomit. A review of Resident 36's 11/9/24 Significant Change MDS revealed she/he had severe cognitive impairment, her/his own teeth that were not broken or decayed, did not wear dentures and required substantial to maximal physical assistance to perform oral hygiene. A review of Resident 36's clinical record revealed no indication the resident was seen by a dentist since admission to the facility. On 1/13/25 at 12:27 PM and 1/14/25 at 2:14 PM Resident 36 was observed to have jagged, broken and decayed teeth. She/he also had thick accumulations of oral secretions on her/his teeth and gums. On 1/14/25 at 8:59 AM Witness 1 (Family…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure waste was properly contained in dumpsters and the garbage storage area was maintained in a sanitary condition for 1 of 1 garbage area reviewed for kitchen sanitation. This placed residents at risk for potential exposure to pathogens related to the harborage and feeding of pests. Findings include: The facility's Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal Policy dated October 2017 outlined the following: - Garbage and refuse containing food wastes will be stored in a manner that is inaccessible to pests. - Outside dumpsters provided by garbage pickup services will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter. On 1/13/25 at 9:15 AM the outside dumpsters adjacent to the kitchen door to the parking lot were observed to be uncovered with garbage bags full of kitchen and resident care waste spilling over and covering the ground around the dumpsters. A minimum of 20 bags of garbage were piled on the ground in the parking lot in front of the dumpsters. On 1/13/25 at 9:36 AM Staff 9 (Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow infection control practices for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 36 and 49) reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination. Findings include: 1. Resident 36 was admitted to the facility in 1/2024 with diagnoses including dysphagia (inability to chew and swallow safely) and pneumonitis (inflammation of the lung tissue) due to inhalation of food and vomit. A review of Resident 36's 11/9/24 Significant Change MDS revealed she/he had severe cognitive impairment and required substantial to maximal physical assistance to complete toileting hygiene. Resident 36's care plan and signed physician's orders indicated staff were to follow enhanced barrier precautions when providing her/him care that involved physical contact. A sign posted on the outside of Resident 36's room outlined the following information and guidance: - Everyone must clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. - Providers and staff must also wear gloves and a gown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 5 of 5 randomly selected staff members (#s 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18) reviewed for in-service training. This placed residents at risk for lack of competent staff. Findings include: On 1/16/25 at 1:00 PM, Staff 2 (DNS) was asked for a list of training hours for Staff 14, Staff 15, Staff 16, Staff 17, and Staff 18. A review of the personal profile records for Staff 14, Staff 15, Staff 16, Staff 17, and Staff 18 revealed no training hours were completed. On 1/16/25 at 1:22 PM, and 1/17/25 at 1:23 PM, Staff 1 (Administrator) and Staff 2 were present for an interview. Staff 2 stated if there was nothing located in the personal profile folders, the 12 hours of in-service training annually was not completed. Staff 1 and Staff 2 acknowledged the 12 hour in-service training were not completed for Staff 14, Staff 15, Staff 16, Staff 17, and Staff 18.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide bed rails needed for bed mobility for 1 of 3 sampled resident (#11) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk of ADL decline. Findings include: Resident 11 admitted to the facility in 5/17/24, with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease with dialysis. The admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident 11 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required moderate assist with bed mobility. A 6/28/24 public complaint indicated Resident 11 had requested bed rails to assist with bed mobility. Resident 11 had to use the headboard to reposition herself/himself in bed, and waited a couple of weeks to have bed rails placed on her/his bed. A 5/17/24 nursing admission note indicated the Resident 11 requested side rails (bed rails). A 5/29/24 Resident Grievance Form filed by Resident 11 revealed the resident wanted bed rails. On 10/1/24 at 12:44 PM, Staff 9 (LPN) stated he recalled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to permit a resident to return to the facility for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#9) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for being unhoused. Findings include: Resident 9 admitted to the facility in 12/2023, with diagnoses including absence of right foot, heart failure and cocaine abuse. The 12/27/23 Discharge Care Plan indicated Resident 9 was homeless, and stayed in her/his car or in motels. A 3/4/24 Progress Note indicated Resident 9 was out of the facility at her/his mother's house. A 3/5/24 Progress note indicated Resident 9 continued to be out of the facility. Staff left a voice message for a return call. A 3/9/13 Progress Note indicated Resident 9 returned to the facility at approximately 4:30 AM and was out of the facility since 3/3/24. Staff 8 (RN) informed Resident 9 she/he was discharged per facility policy however Resident 9 went to her/his previous room and went to bed. Staff 8 placed a call the the on-call manager. A 5/3/24 public complaint indicated upon Resident 9's return to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure meals were provided for a discharge for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for unsafe discharge. Findings include: Resident 5 admitted to the facility in 12/2023, with diagnoses including hypertension. Resident 5 discharged from the facility on 1/11/24. The 1/10/24 Discharge Instructions indicated Resident 5 was to be discharged to another state on 1/11/24. There was no indication a meal was ordered or provided for the resident for the extended transport. On 1/23/24 Witness 5 indicated Resident 5 was discharged from the facility and was transported to a nursing facility in another state. The Progress notes revealed Resident 5 discharged from the facility on 1/11/24 at 10:15 AM and was expected to arrive at the new facility at 5:30 PM. On 10/3/24 at 10:14 AM, Staff 10 (CNA) stated she observed Resident 5 discharge on [DATE]. Staff 10 stated the resident was sent out by medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure optometry services were provided timely for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for quality of care. This placed residents at risk for unmet optical needs. Findings include: Resident 5 admitted to the facility in 3/2022 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure and diabetes mellitus. Resident 5's initial care plan dated 4/5/22 revealed she/he had cataracts in both eyes. Interventions listed were to refer Resident 5 for an eye exam. Resident 5's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed a CAA for visual function was triggered for cataracts. A 6/17/23 progress note revealed Staff 13 (SSD) had spoken to Resident 5 about scheduling a vision appointment. There was no documentation any appointments were made by Staff 13. On 7/9/24 at 1:59 PM, Resident 5 stated she/he made requests for an eye exam since she/he admitted to the facility but the facility did not schedule any opthamology appointments until recently. On 7/17/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review review it was determined the facility failed to ensure routine dental services were provided for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for dental care needs. This placed residents at risk for unmet dental needs. Findings include: Resident 5 admitted to the facility in 3/2022 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure and diabetes mellitus. Resident 5's initial care plan dated 4/5/22 revealed she/he had dental care needs related to her/his edentulous (no natural teeth or tooth fragments only) status. Interventions listed were to obtain a dental consult. Care conference notes dated 8/19/22 revealed Resident 5 requested a dental exam. A 6/17/23 progress note revealed Staff 13 (SSD) had spoken to Resident 5 about scheduling a dental appointment. There was no documentation any appointments were made until new orders were issued on 8/31/23. On 7/9/24 at 1:59 PM, Resident 5 was observed to be missing most of her/his natural teeth. She/he stated she/he requested to see a dentist since she/he admitted to the facility because she/he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-17 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to develop and present a QAPI plan to the State Survey Agency (SSA) and failed to present documentation and evidence of an ongoing QAPI Program. This placed residents at risk of not receiving the care and services for optimal resident outcomes. Findings include: A review of facility QAPI records presented by Staff 1 (Administrator) showed no evidence the facility had developed a QAPI plan. Staff 1 also acknowledged there was no ongoing QAPI program. On 6/17/24 at 11:39 AM, Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the facility had not developed a QAPI Plan.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-17 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a quarterly QAA (Quality Assessment and Assurance) committee meeting and failed to include the Medical Director reviewed for quality assurance. This placed residents at risk of not receiving the care and services for optimal resident outcomes. Findings include: A review of facility records presented by Staff 1 (Administrator) showed no evidence nor documentation the facility conducted quarterly QAA meetings and with no Medical Director involvement. On 6/17/24 at 11:39 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the facility QAA committee had not met quarterly and the facility's Medical Director had no involvement.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was spoken to in a dignified manner for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for decreased self-worth. Findings include: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 3/2023 with diagnoses including fracture of the thoracic vertebra (spinal fracture) and anxiety disorder. Resident 2's 4/3/23 admission MDS identified the resident with no cognitive impairment. Resident 2's 3/29/23 Care Plan identified the resident with a mood problem related to depression, paranoia, anxiety, and panic disorder. A 2/27/24 Facility Investigation form indicated Resident 2 reported on 2/22/24 that Staff 10 (CNA) was witnessed being yelled at, which caused Resident 2 anxiety. Staff 10 was placed on administrative leave and upon completion of the facility's investigation was terminated. On 3/19/24 at 12:53 PM, Resident 2 confirmed Staff 10 yelled at her/him and it made her/him anxious. Resident 2 confirmed this behavior was disrespectful and it frightened her/him.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain mobility with transfers for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for ADL care. This placed residents at risk for unmet ADL needs. Findings include: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 10/2023 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (a disease that damages the central nervous system) and paraplegia. Resident 3's 10/25/23 Care Plan indicated the facility was to assist the resident with ADL's including locomotion and range of motion activities due to paraplegia that affects her/his lower extremities. On 3/19/24 at 12:20 PM, Resident 3 stated that the facility didn't assist Resident 3 out of bed and did not provide her/him with her/his daily range of motion exercises due to lack of time the care staff had throughout the day. On 3/19/24 at 12:40 PM, Staff 8 (CNA) confirmed care staff did not always have enough time to get Resident 3 out of bed or assist with her/his daily ADL care needs due to the number of tasks that needed to be completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medical records for each resident were complete for 1 of 5 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for incomplete medical records. Findings include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2/2023 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (chronic heart condition), Stage IV chronic kidney disease and history of right lower leg amputation. A 3/8/23 Incident Report indicated Resident 1 experienced a fall at 5:09 PM in her/his room. The resident's medical record did not include a fall documentation in a progress note or a fall assessment on 3/8/23. An Alert progress note on 3/8/23 at 10:16 PM (five hours after the fall) directed staff to monitor for [signs and symptoms] of pain on back right sided scapula/flank [shoulder/lower back] area. The progress note did not indicate the resident experienced a fall. On 11/9/23 at 12:24 PM Staff 20 (LPN) stated she checked Resident 1 after the 3/8/23 fall for a head injury and observed an abrasion on her/his scapula…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure call lights were in good working order for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for call lights. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 7 admitted to the facility in April 2023 with diagnoses including stroke. On 11/8/23 at 9:25 AM Witness 11 (Complainant) stated Resident 7's call light did not work and the issue was reported to staff daily until it was fixed. A 5/1/23 Grievance Record indicated Resident 7's call light did not work for the first four days at the facility. On 11/7/23 at 11:20 AM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged Resident 7's call light did not work the first four days of her/his admission.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment was maintained in 2 of 4 halls and 1 of 3 dining rooms reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for lack of a homelike environment. Findings include: 1. Resident 55 was admitted to the facility in 3/2023 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and muscle weakness of one side of the body) following a stroke. Her/his 7/8/23 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact. On 8/9/23 at 2:36 PM Resident 55 stated the television noise from room [ROOM NUMBER] was very loud and goes on all night until morning. She/he reported the noise to staff and stated, They don't seem to be concerned that it is so damned loud. On 8/10/23 at 5:05 AM the audio from the television in room [ROOM NUMBER] was heard throughout the entirety of the hallway and from the facility lobby. On 8/10/23 at 5:40 AM Staff 16 (LPN) stated the television was loud and it was on all night. He reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were secured and only accessible to authorized persons for 3 of 4 medication/treatment carts observed. This placed residents at risk for drug diversion. Findings include: On 8/10/23 at 5:05 AM a medication cart was observed unlocked in the hallway adjacent to room [ROOM NUMBER]. No nurses or CMAs were in the hallway. On 8/10/23 at 5:06 AM a treatment cart was observed unlocked and unattended adjacent to room [ROOM NUMBER]. Staff 16 (LPN) was observed in the nursing station room and the unlocked cart was out of his line of sight. On 8/10/23 at 5:07 AM a medication cart was observed unlocked in the hallway between rooms eight and nine. Staff 30 (LPN) was not observed in the hallway or in the line of sight of the medication cart. Between 5:10 AM and 5:11 AM multiple staff were observed to pass the unlocked cart. On 8/10/23 at 5:12 AM Staff 30 returned to the unlocked medication cart between rooms eight and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1. Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff performed appropriate and adequate hand hygiene and the provision of appropriate hand hygiene for residents during meal delivery for 1 of 4 halls observed during the lunch time meal. This placed residents at risk for infection and lack of hygiene. Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website section titled, Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings indicated the following: - Patients should clean hands before preparing or eating food. - Healthcare personnel should perform hand hygiene every time they enter a patient room and when they remove gloves. - Healthcare personnel should use an alcohol based hand rub (ABHR) or wash with soap and water immediately after touching a patient and the patient's immediate environment. Healthcare facilities should require healthcare personnel to perform hand hygiene in accordance with CDC recommendations. On 8/9/23 from 11:56 AM to 12:11 PM observations were made of Staff 13 (CNA) and Staff 35 (CNA) delivering meal trays to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' call lights were functional for 1 of 1 sampled facility reviewed for call lights. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: On 8/8/23 at 8:45 AM Staff 5 (LPN Resident Care Manager) was observed distributing bells to residents in Unity hallway and advised the residents to Ring if you need assistance. She reported the call light system was not working since 4:00 PM on 8/7/23. On 8/8/23 at 9:16 AM Resident 55 stated staff gave her/him a bell about 10 minutes earlier and she/he heard staff members talking in the hallway last night about the call light system not working. Resident 55 stated she/he pressed the call button between 10:00 PM and 11:00 PM on 8/7/23 to request assistance to empty her/his urinal. She/he verbalized concern that she/he did not have a functioning call light all night. On 8/8/23 at 9:36 AM Resident 227 reported she noticed the call light system was not working during the previous night and she/he hollered to staff passing in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity and respect for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 9 and 41) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for impaired dignity. Findings include: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in 1/2022 with diagnoses including heart failure. Resident 9's 5/6/2023 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident experienced moderate impairment in cognition and did not have any behaviors or mood symptoms. Resident 41 was admitted to the facility in 1/2022 with diagnoses including brain cancer. Resident 41's 4/24/2023 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and did not have any behaviors or mood symptoms. Resident 41's 5/17/23 Care Plan revealed the resident had a behavior problem which included verbal aggression, accusations the building was attempting to choke her/him with food, suicidal ideations and attention seeking. The care plan listed the following interventions: - intervene as necessary to protect the rights and safety of others. -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain informed consent prior to administration of psychotropic medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 15 and 26) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for being uninformed of the risks and benefits of their medications. Findings include: 1. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 6/2021 with diagnoses including depression and anxiety. Resident 15's health record revealed a Psychotropic Disclosure and Consent Form was input into the health record on 6/24/21. The form had an indecipherable signature on the resident line, no resident name, no information written, and no check mark to indicate what medication(s) she/he received. No other evidence was found to indicate the resident was informed regarding the risks and benefits of venlafaxine [mental health disorder] medication) or Vistaril (anti-anxiety medication) or evidence to indicate the resident consented to receive the medications. Resident 26's 7/7/23 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the call light was in reach of the resident for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#65) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Resident 65 was admitted to the facility in 5/2023 with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury. Resident 65's 5/26/23 admission MDS revealed the resident required the assistance of two staff for ADLs. Resident 65's current Care Plan specified to keep the call light within reach of the resident. On 8/7/23 at 1:22 PM Resident 65 was in her/his bed. The resident's call light cord was wrapped around the left bed rail and the call button was on the floor. When asked how to ask for help, Resident 65 pointed to the left bed rail and indicated the call light. When asked if she/he was able to reach the call light, Resident 20 shook her/his head no. Observations from 8/7/23 through 8/10/23 between the hours of 6:01 AM and 3:23 PM revealed the call light cord wrapped around the left bed rail and the call button on the floor. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency within the required timeframe for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 41 and 227) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: 1. The facility investigation initiated on 4/29/23 and ended on 6/1/23 indicated an allegation of abuse between Resident 41 and Resident 40 occurred on 4/29/23 at 11:00 AM. The FRI form was received by the state agency on 5/1/23 at 6:05 PM. On 8/11/23 at 12:37 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the incident was reported to the state agency after the required time frame. No further information was provided. 2. The facility reported an allegation of abuse between Resident 227 and Resident 228 which occurred on 8/7/23 at 1:30 AM. The FRI form was received by the state agency on 8/8/23 at 3:20 PM. On 8/11/23 at 12:37 PM Staff 1 (Administrator) acknowledged the incident was reported to the state agency after the required time frame. No further information was provided.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately code the resident MDS assessments for 2 of 8 sampled residents (#s 15 and 59) reviewed for dental, communication and sensory care. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate assessments and unmet care needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 59 was admitted to the facility in 2/2023 with diagnoses including stroke. Resident 59's 2/16/23 SNF Nursing admission Assessment revealed the resident had an obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth and experienced mouth or facial pain, discomfort or difficulty with chewing. Resident 59's 2/23/23 admission MDS revealed the resident was cognitively intact and had no obvious or likely cavities or broken natural teeth. Resident 59's 5/26/23 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident did not experience mouth of facial pain, discomfort or difficulty with chewing. On 8/7/23 Resident 59 stated she/he admitted to the facility with multiple teeth broken below the gum line. Resident 59 stated her/his teeth caused her/him pain and she/he needed them all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-14 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop and provide a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#26) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for being uninformed about their plan of care. Findings include: The facility's 3/2022 Care Plan - Baseline Policy & Procedure specified, A baseline plan of care was developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission and the resident was provided a written summary of the baseline care plan. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including blood clots in both legs. Resident 26's health record revealed a Baseline Care Plan dated 1/10/23, 34 days after the resident was admitted to the facility. The section titled, Resident/Responsible Party given copy of Baseline Care Plan was marked No. On 8/14/23 at 12:56 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated a Baseline Care Plan was completed upon admission, included information needed to direct the resident's care and a copy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review It was determined the facility failed to provide adequate bathing for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#227) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet bathing and personal hygiene needs. Findings include: Resident 227 was admitted to the facility in 7/2023 with diagnoses including fracture of her/his femur (thigh bone). Resident 227's 7/28/23 Care Plan directed staff to keep her/his skin clean and dry, to use lotion on dry skin and her/his showers were scheduled on Wednesdays, Saturdays and PRN. Resident 227's 8/4/23 admission MDS indicated she/he was cognitively intact and required assistance from two staff for bathing related to weakness and deconditioning. On 8/7/23 at 10:26 AM Resident 227 stated she/he received one shower since she/he was admitted to the facility. A review of Resident 227's 7/28/23 and 8/12/23 Bathing Task Records revealed no evidence a shower was offered or received on 7/29/23, 8/2/23, 8/9/23 or 8/12/23. On 8/10/23 at 6:11 AM Staff 21 (CNA) stated she worked with Resident 227 regularly and [she/he]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing person-centered activities program for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 27, 41 and 65) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for a decline in psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life. Findings include: The facility's 6/2018 Individual Activities and Room Visit Program Policy & Procedure indicated the following: - Individualized activities offered are reflective of the resident's activity interests, as identified in the Activity Assessment, progress notes and the resident's Comprehensive Care Plan. - It was recommended residents with in-room activity programs received, at a minimum, three in-room visits per week. A typical in-room visit was ten to fifteen minutes in length, but may be longer if appropriate for the resident. The facility's 6/2018 Activities Attendance Policy indicated attendance and participation was recorded for every resident in group and individual activities on a daily basis. 1. Resident 41 was admitted to the facility in 1/2022…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-14 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure treatment and services to maintain vision and hearing abilities were received for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 9 and 59) reviewed for communication and sensory care. This placed residents at risk for unmet vision and hearing needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in 1/2022 with diagnoses including heart failure. Resident 9's 5/6/23 Quarterly MDS revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition and adequate vision without the use of corrective lenses. Resident 9's 5/30/23 Care Plan revealed the following: - Focus: Vision deficit characterized by pain, decreased/impaired vision related to decreased visual acuity. - Goal: Visual support needs will be met by staff. - Obtain eye exam to ensure appropriate meds and compensatory mechanism. A 6/17/23 Progress Note completed by Staff 8 (Social Services Director) indicated Resident 9 was interested in scheduling a vision appointment. On 8/7/23 at 1:45 PM and on 8/10/23 at 7:17 AM Resident 9 stated her/his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free of potential fire hazards for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#15) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for injury and exposure to a fire. Findings include: The facility's current Smoking Policy and Procedure outlined the following: - Any resident with smoking privileges requiring monitoring shall have the direct supervision of a staff member, family member, visitors or volunteer worker at all times while smoking. - No resident will be allowed to store any smoking materials in their room. All smoking material will be stored in a secured designated area accessible only to staff. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 6/2021 with diagnoses including depression. Resident 15's 7/7/23 Annual MDS indicated she/he was cognitively intact. Resident 15's 7/7/23 Smoking Assessment revealed she/he was unable to retrieve a lit cigarette from the ground or her/his lap, smoked more than 10 times a day and was unable to smoke safely or independently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to respond to pharmacy recommendations for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 15, 20, and 27) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for potential adverse consequences related to medications and lack of medication oversight. Findings include: The facility's 5/2019 Medication Regimen Review Policy & Procedure specified a Consultant Pharmacist reviewed the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly to identify irregularities and minimize potential risks associated with medications. The attending physician documents in the medical record that the irregularity was reviewed and what action was taken to address it. 1. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in 6/2021 with diagnoses including anxiety and depression. A 6/1/23 Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review revealed the following: - consider adding maximum dose parameters to PRN Acetaminophen order. - consider adding maximum dose parameters to PRN Sumatriptan (treats migraines). Review of Resident 15's health record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure antipsychotic and psychotropic medications were clinically indicated, adequately monitored for effectiveness and routinely assessed for appropriate use for 1 of 5 sampled residents (# 26) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences and receiving unnecessary medications. Findings include: The facility's 7/2022 Antipsychotic Medication Use Policy & Procedure specified residents would not receive medications that were not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition, medications would be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and were subject to a dose reduction and review. Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including blood clots in both legs. Resident 26's 12/14/22 admission MDS, 3/13/23 Quarterly MDS and 6/13/23 Quarterly MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact, had a psychotic disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident 27 was admitted to the facility in 2/2022 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. A 5/2023 Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review of Resident 27's medications revealed the following: - The resident has been taking haloperidol (antipsychotic medication) twice daily since 9/27/23. Please evaluate the current dose and consider a dose reduction to haloperidol every afternoon. Resident 27's 6/27/23 Annual MDS revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, had no mood symptoms or behaviors and received haloperidol. Resident 27's 9/2022 through 8/2023 physician orders included haloperidol 0.25mg twice daily. Resident 27's 9/2022 through 8/2023 MARs revealed the resident received haloperidol 0.25mg twice daily. Review of Resident 27's health record revealed no evidence to indicate a GDR for haloperidol was attempted as required. On 8/14/23 at 12:56 PM Staff 2 (DNS) and Staff 4 (RNCM) were informed of the findings. Staff 2 acknowledged there was no attempt to reduce the haloperidol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure routine dental services were provided for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#62) reviewed for dental care needs. This placed residents at risk for unmet dental needs. Findings include: Resident 62 was admitted to the facility in 3/2023 with diagnoses including encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation (the removal of a limb). Resident 62's 4/7/23 admission MDS indicated she/he was cognitively intact and had no dental health problems. A 6/27/23 Progress Note indicated the resident told Staff 8 (Social Services Director) she/he was interested in having dental work completed. On 8/7/23 at 3:40 PM Resident 62 was observed to be edentulous (having no teeth). The resident stated she/he spoke with Staff 8 about her/his need for dental work but had not received an update from her. On 8/11/23 at 12:51 PM Staff 8 stated Resident 62 had an appointment on 6/10/23 but it was canceled by the provider. She stated, It was just the size of the caseload that caused the delay. It should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-14 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure routine dental services were provided for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 4, 30 & 59) reviewed for dental care needs. This placed residents at risk for unmet dental needs. Findings include: 1. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 3/2022 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (a disease of the central nervous system that disrupts communication between the brain and the body). Resident 4's 4/10/23 Annual MDS indicated she/he had no natural teeth or teeth fragments, received food with a mechanically altered texture and was not assessed for cognition. The Dental CAA indicated dental care was to be addressed to minimize her/his decline related to impaired dentition. A review of Resident 4's 5/2/23 Care Plan revealed a goal to maintain oral hygiene through a dental consult and monitoring for gum, mouth and jaw pain. A progress note dated 6/17/23 indicated Resident 4 told Staff 8 (Social Services Director) she/he was interested in a dental appointment. Resident 4's 7/11/23 Quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accommodate resident food choices for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#30) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for food choices not being honored. Findings include: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in 2/2023 with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (impairment of the lungs resulting in inadequate oxygen delivery to the tissues). Resident 30's 3/6/23 admission MDS indicated she/he was cognitively intact. Resident 30's 6/23/23 signed physician orders revealed the resident received a renal diet. Resident 30's 8/7/23 Care Plan indicated staff members were to explain all procedures and treatments, medications, results of labs/tests, condition, all changes, rules and options. On 8/7/23 at 1:00 PM Resident 30 stated, I'm on a renal diet and what is on my plate and my tray doesn't match what is on the menu. I think I should know ahead of time what I'm going to have for my meals. On 8/9/23 at 12:40 PM Resident 30 was observed during lunch. She/he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-01-17 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure transfer notices with appeal rights were provided in writing to residents and their representatives for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 80 and 81) reviewed for hospitalizations. This placed residents at risk for lack of information regarding their options and rights. Findings include: 1. Resident 80 was admitted to the facility in 2/2024 with diagnoses including a stroke and difficulty with swallowing. A review of Resident 80's health record revealed she/he was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. No evidence was found in Resident 80's health record to indicate a transfer notice with appeal rights was provided in writing to the resident or their representative upon transfer to the hospital. On 1/16/25 at 2:21 PM Staff 2 (DNS) stated transfer notifications with appeal rights were not being provided to residents or their representatives when they transferred to the hospital and it was her expectation that required notifications be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-01-17 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide residents with a written bed hold notification, including reserved bed hold payment, at the time of transfer to the hospital for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 80 and 81) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their choices and potential financial responsibilities. Findings include: 1. Resident 80 was admitted to the facility in 2/2024 with diagnoses including a stroke and difficulty with swallowing. A review of Resident 80's health record revealed she/he was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. No evidence was found in Resident 80's health record to indicate written notice of the facility's bed hold policy was provided to the resident or her/his representative when she/he was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. On 1/16/25 at 2:21 PM Staff 2 (DNS) confirmed a written bed hold policy including reserved payment was not provided to Resident 80 or their representative when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$32,383 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $24,193 — penalty dated 2024-06-17
  • $8,190 — penalty dated 2023-11-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SAPPHIRE HEALTH SERVICES — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 51.9+1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.0+2.0 vs chain
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BECKER, ANDREWIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF30%since 05/01/2024
HILTY, LISAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 05/01/2024
MORRIS, BRYANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF5%since 05/01/2024
RICKER, KEVINIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF40%since 05/01/2024
SAPPHIRE HEALTHCARE SRVS.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/04/2021
AMES, DEBORAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MEEKO, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 9%Other / private 14%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$611per resident / day
operating cost
$18,588per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$613per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oregon Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oregon
$16,760/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$18,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,875/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 385284. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next