No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hilltop Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

700 S. Cayuga Avenue, Altoona, PA 16602 · For profit - Individual · 133 certified beds · (814) 946-0471 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (814) 946-0471 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Feb 2024
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
200 E Plank Rd · (814) 944-9224 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3415 Pleasant Valley Blvd · (814) 941-3090 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4th Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3220 Pleasant Valley Blvd · (814) 944-0171

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.3%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.1%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.9%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.1%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.6%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.7%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.8%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.8%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.7%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.6%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine57.6%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.0%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.1%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.241.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.341.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.4%CMS range 39.6–60.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 6.5–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified88.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 4.2–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.49
RN hours/ resident / day
0.77
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.40
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
40.8%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 133 beds and averages 110.5 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-11)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were administered to the correct resident for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1), resulting in medication errors.Findings include: The facility's medication administration policy, dated February 26, 2026, revealed that medications are to be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders. The individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, the right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated March 20, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and required assistance from staff for all daily care needs and had diagnoses that included dementia and high blood pressure. Current physician's orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-19 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's meal schedule, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that meals were served at regularly scheduled times on the nursing unit. Findings include: The facility's policy for meal distribution, dated June 26, 2025, reported that meals are transported to the dining locations in a manner that ensures proper temperature maintenance, protects against contamination, and are delivered in a timely and accurate manner. Review of the facility's tray delivery logs revealed that lunch meals to be delivered to the B wing at 11:55 a.m., C wing at 12:10 p.m., main dining room at 12:20 p.m., D wing at 12:30 p.m., and A wing at 12:40 p.m. Dinner meals were to be delivered to the main dining room at 5:30 p.m., B wing at 5:40 p.m., C wing at 5:50 p.m., D wing at 6:00 p.m., and A wing at 6:10 p.m. On March 18, 2026, the lunch meal for B wing was to be delivered at 11:55 a.m. The lunch trays did not arrive until 12:45 p.m., the dining cart was 50 minutes late. On March 18, 2026, the lunch meal for C wing was to be delivered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policies and observations, as well as staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff served the appropriate planned portion sizes. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food quality and palatability, dated June 26, 2025, revealed that menu items are prepared according to the menu, production guidelines, and standardized recipes. The posted lunch menu outside of the main dining room for February 18, 2026, indicated that residents had a choice of ham or chicken. Review of the facility's dietary guide sheet for the lunch menu on March 18, 2026, revealed that the portion of honey glazed ham was to be 3-ounces. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 9, dated March 7, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was understood, could understand, and was independent with eating. Observations of Resident 9 on March 18, 2026, at 1:16 p.m. in the main dining room revealed that she had one half slice of ham…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve palatable food that was at appropriate temperatures and consistencies.Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food preparation, dated June 26, 2025, stated all foods are prepared in accordance with the Food and Drug Administration Food Code. All foods will be held at appropriate temperatures, greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for hot holding and less than 41 degrees F for cold food holding. The facility's policy regarding food quality and palatability, dated June 26, 2025, stated food will be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance. Food will be palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. The Dining Services Director and [NAME] are responsible for food preparation. Menu items are prepared according to the menu, production guidelines, and standardized recipes. Food should be at the appropriate temperature as determined by the type of food to ensure resident's satisfaction. A test tray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, as well as staff and resident interviews and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient dietary staff to perform essential kitchen duties to ensure that meals were served at regularly scheduled times on the nursing unit, and to ensure food was served at palatable temperatures and appropriate consistencies. Findings include: The facility's policy for meal distribution, dated June 26, 2025, reported that meals are transported to the dining locations in a manner that ensures proper temperature maintenance, protects against contamination, and are delivered in a timely and accurate manner. Review of the facility's tray delivery logs revealed that lunch meals to be delivered to the B wing at 11:55 a.m., C wing at 12:10 p.m., main dining room at 12:20 p.m., D wing at 12:30 p.m., and A wing at 12:40 p.m. Dinner meals were to be delivered to the main dining room at 5:30 p.m., B wing at 5:40 p.m., C wing at 5:50 p.m., D wing at 6:00 p.m., and A wing at 6:10 p.m. On March 18, 2026, the lunch meal for B wing was to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician for three of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 11, 13, 124). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 11, dated November 12, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs and had diagnoses that included coronary artery disease (a disease that limits blood flow to the heart caused by plaque buildup in the arteries) and orthostatic hypotension (low blood pressure when standing quickly). Physician's orders for Resident 11, dated August 11, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 5 milligrams (mg) of Midodrine (a medication that treats low blood pressure) two times a day for orthostatic hypotension (a drop in blood pressure when changing positions like sitting to standing) and was to be held if the systolic blood pressure (SBP-the top number in a blood pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.Findings include: The facility's policy for Dietary Staff Attire, dated November 20, 2025 indicated that all employees must wear approved attire for the performance of their duties. All staff members will have their hair off the shoulder, confined in a hair net or cap, and facial hair properly restrained. Observations of Dietary Aide 2 on December 10, 2025, at 12:00 p.m. revealed no beard/mustache covers in place while he was preparing the lunch meal trays. Interview on December 10, 2025, at 12:00 p.m. with Assistant Dietary Manager 1 confirmed that Dietary Aide 2 should have his beard and mustache covered when preparing food. The facility's policy for Food Receiving and Storage, dated November 20, 2025, indicated that all foods belonging to residents must be labeled with the resident's name, the item, and the use by date. Partially eaten food may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the resident and/or resident representative in advance of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medication (medications that affect the persons mental state, emotions and behavior) use and the treatment alternatives prior to initiating the administration of the medication for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 32). Findings Include: The facility's policy related to the use of psychotropic medications, dated November 20, 2025, indicated that residents, families and/or the representative are involved in the medication management process. Psychotropic medication management includes: indications for use; dose (including duplicate therapy); duration; adequate monitoring for efficacy and adverse consequences; and preventing, identifying and responding to adverse consequences. When determining whether to initiate, modify, or discontinue medication therapy, the IDT conducts an evaluation of the resident. The evaluation will attempt to clarify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to honor a resident's right regarding diet consistency for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 105).Findings include: A facility policy regarding Promoting/Maintaining Resident Self-Determination/Resident Right to Refuse, dated November 20, 2025, indicated that the facility shall ensure that all residents are afforded their right to a dignified existence, self-determination, respect, full recognition of their individuality, consideration and privacy in treatment and care for personal needs and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. The facility shall protect and promote the rights of each resident and shall encourage and assist each resident in the fullest possible exercise of these rights.Each resident shall have the right to participate in planning his/her care and treatment or any change in his or her care and treatment. Each resident shall have the right to refuse medication and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for two of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 13, 14).Findings include: A facility policy regarding care plans, dated November 20, 2025, indicated that the facility will develop a care plan that describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, and that assessment of resident's are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the resident's conditions change. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 13, dated October 10, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance with care needs, and had an indwelling catheter (a flexible tube left inside the bladder for continuous urine drainage). A care plan for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 53).Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 53, dated October 9, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, and had diagnoses that included diabetes. Physician's orders for Resident 53 dated October included an order for the resident to have blood sugars checked twice a day and if blood sugar is less than 70 mg/dL to follow the hypoglycemia protocol, and if the blood sugars are greater than 400 mg/dL to notify the medical doctor and registered nurse supervisor. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 53 for October and November revealed no documented evidence of the blood sugars for the resident from October 6, 2025 at 2000 to November 15, 2025 at 0630. Interview with the Director of Nursing on December 11,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plan of corrections for an annual survey ending January 17,2025 revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending December 11, 2025, identified repeated deficiencies related to a failure to revise care plans, prepare and store food safely, and ensure infection prevention policies are being followed. The facility's plan of correction for care plan revision, cited during the survey ending January 17, 2025, revealed that the facility would complete audits and report the results of the audits to the QAPI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper infection control practices were followed while administering medications for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 30).Findings include: The facility's medication administration policy, dated November 20, 2025, indicated that staff was to follow established facility infection control procedures (e.g., handwashing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etc.) for the administration of medications as applicable. Physician's orders for Resident 30, dated May 14, 2025 included orders for the resident to receive 10 milligram (mg) of oxycodone (a controlled substance used to treat pain), 250 mg of azithromycin (an antibiotic), 5 mg of prednisone (a steroid), 20 mg of Lasix (a diuretic), 25-250 mg of Sinemet (a medication to treat Parkinson's disease), one puff of 100/6.2/25 micrograms (mcg) Trelegy inhaler, 2- 2.6 mg of senna (a medication to help treat constipation), 20 mg Pepcid (a medication to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician orders were written and followed for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 2).Findings include:A facility policy for physician's orders, dated July 31, 2025, revealed that verbal orders are given to the nurse by the physician in person or by telephone; however, they are not written by the physician in the medical record. Verbal orders are to be followed through by making appropriate notification.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated June 16, 2025, revealed that the resident was understood and could understand others, was cognitively intact and required assistance with daily care needs.A pharmacist recommendation for Resident 2, dated June 18 2025, reviewed and signed by the physician on June 19, 2025, revealed that aspirin and famotidine were to be discontinued.There was no documented evidence in Resident 2's clinical record to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment in the main kitchen dishroom. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food preparation and service, dated February 13, 2025, indicated that areas for cleaning dishes and utensils are kept and maintained in a sanitary environment. Observations in the main kitchen dish room on April 1, 2025, at 12:06 p.m. revealed that there was a large, round, upright fan blowing directly on the dish dry rack. The dry rack contained several pots and pans. Those pans were put away and newly cleaned dishes were placed in the dry rack. The fan was noted to have a very heavy amount of visible dirt and debris accumulated on the blade cover. There were several half-inch tendrils of dirt/debris flowing from the fan cover as the fan was blowing toward the clean pots/pans and dishes. Interview with the Dietary Manager on April 1, 2025, at 12:10 p.m. confirmed that a large, upright, dirty fan was blowing directly on the drying rack that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident representative had an opportunity to formulate an advance directive (instructions regarding the provision of health care when the resident is incapacitated) or assist in formulating an advance directive for six of 54 residents reviewed (Residents 37, 62, 81, 88, 90, 100). Findings include: The facility policy regarding advance directives, dated November 26, 2024, indicated that on admission the facility will determine if the resident has executed an advance directive, and if not, determine whether the resident would like to formulate an advance directive. The facility will provide the resident or resident representative information, in a manner that is easy to understand, about the right to refuse medical or surgical treatment and formulate an advance directive. Any decision making regarding the resident's choices will be documented in the resident's medical record and communicated to the interdisciplinary team…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies and written menus, as well as observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their planned menu. Findings include: A facility policy, dated November 25, 2024, indicated that service staff will inspect food trays to ensure that the correct meal was provided to each resident. Observations on January 13, 2025, at 11:38 a.m. of Resident 100 in her room during lunch revealed that her tray did not have margarine on it for her roll. Interview with the resident at that time revealed that she did not want to eat a dry roll. She stated that she eats in her room and her meal trays routinely come without sugar packets, condiments, napkins, or flatware. Interview with Nurse Aide 4 on January 13, 2025, at 1:09 p.m. confirmed that there was no margarine on any of the trays on A wing, and she called the kitchen, but there was none available. During an interview with a group of residents on January 14, 2025, at 10:26 a.m. the residents indicated that they do not receive the correct menu or they are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, as well as observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve palatable food that was at appropriate temperatures. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food service temperatures, dated November 26, 2024, revealed that meal service temperatures for hot foods were to be 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or above, and cold foods were to be 40 degrees F or below. Interview with Resident 77, who was alert and oriented and able to make her needs known, on January 13, 2025, at 12:07 p.m. revealed that she eats in her room, her meal trays were served cold, and foods are overcooked and not palatable. She also does not receive all of the items on her meal ticket. Interview with Resident 100, who was alert and oriented and able to make her needs known, on January 13, 2025, at 11:38 a.m. revealed that she eats in her room and that her meal trays are served cold and without sugar packets, condiments, napkins, or flatware. During an interview with a group of residents on January 14, 2025, at 10:26 a.m. the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to store food under sanitary conditions, failing to ensure that food was served under sanitary conditions, and failing to ensure that ice was made and stored in sanitary ice machines for one of one ice machines (kitchen). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food labeling and dating, dated November 26, 2024, revealed that upon receipt, all items must have a received date and an expiration date, and upon opening, all items must have an open date and a use-by date. The facility's policy regarding ice machines and ice storage, dated November 26, 2024, revealed that ice machines and ice storage/distribution containers would be used and maintained to ensure a safe and sanitary supply of ice. The facility's procedure for washing pots and pans, undated, revealed that the staff were to check the chemical sanitizer strength and record the parts per million, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for eight of 54 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 8, 11, 12, 34 63, 70, 80). Findings include: CDC guidance on isolation precautions and Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO's - bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics, and these antibiotics can no longer be used to control or kill the bacteria), dated July 12, 2022, indicates that MDRO transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment in residents' rooms for one of 54 residents reviewed (Resident 8). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding homelike environment, dated November 26, 2024, indicated that the purpose was to provide a safe, clean, and sanitary living environment for the residents. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 8, dated November 26, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, was usually understood and usually able to understand others, was dependent on staff for all care needs, and had diagnoses that included quadriplegia (paralysis or weakness to both side of the body due to brain injury) and depression. Observations of Resident 8's room on January 17, 2025, at 10:39 a.m. revealed that there was an area of broken dry wall, approximately 12 inches by 12 inches near the closet and another area of damaged dry wall that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required time frame for one of 54 residents reviewed (Resident 81). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that the assessment reference date (ARD - the last day of the assessment's look-back period) of a quarterly MDS assessment must be no more than 92 days after the ARD of the most recent assessment of any type, and the assessment was to have a completion date (Section Z0500B) that was no later than the ARD plus 14 calendar days. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 81 had an ARD of December 13, 2024, which was 116 days after the previous annual MDS assessment with an ARD of August 19, 2024. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for two of 54 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 11). Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 7, dated December 6, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired and required assistance with care needs, was taking an anticoagulant (medication that thins the blood), had an indwelling catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine from the bladder), and had diagnoses that included coronary artery disease (a disease that limits blood flow to the heart caused by plaque buildup in the arteries) and neurogenic bladder (bladder lacks control due to nerve or muscle problems). An anticoagulant care plan for Resident 7, dated January 23, 2023, indicated that the resident was on Coumadin (an anticoagulant) therapy related to the presence of a cardiac…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, as well as staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with showers as scheduled for one of 54 residents reviewed (Resident 24). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 24, dated November 4, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for bathing/showering, and had diagnosis that included chronic congestive heart failure (a long-term condition where the heart cannot pump enough blood to the body) and diabetes. Review of Resident 24's active task list, initiated on July 31, 2024, revealed that the resident had a bathing preference for showers, and showers were scheduled to be provided every Wednesday and Sunday on dayshift. Review of Resident 24's Bath/Shower record, dated October 2024 through December 2024, revealed that a bed bath was provided instead of a shower on October 2, 9, 13, 16, 27, and 30. Only bed baths were provided to the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders regarding treatment administration were followed for one of 54 residents reviewed (Resident 9). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 9, dated October 16, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with personal care needs, and had diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements). Physician's orders for Resident 9, dated March 29, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 2.5 milligrams (mg) of Midodine Hydrochloride (used to treat low blood pressure) twice a day and to hold the medication if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP-the top number in a blood pressure reading) is greater than 120. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 9, dated October 2024, revealed that 2.5 mg of Midodrine Hydrochloride was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that tube feeding residual amounts were documented per the facility's policy for one of 54 residents reviewed (Resident 70). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding checking gastric residual volume (GRV - the amount of fluid remaining in the stomach at a point in time during enteral nutritional feeding), dated November 26, 2024, indicated that the purpose of this procedure is to assess tolerance of enteral feeding and minimize the potential for aspiration. Staff were to aspirate the stomach contents and if the GRV was greater than 250 milliliters (mL), the physician was to be notified, and staff were to asses the resident for feeding intolerance. The person performing the procedure was to record the amount of, if any, gastric residual in the resident's medical record. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 70, dated December 3, 2024, indicated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending February 1, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending January 17, 2025, identified repeated deficiencies related to failure to maintain a homelike environment, failure to maintain accuracy of assessments, failure to update/revise care plans, failure to provide quality of care, failure to ensure food was palatable and had proper serving temperatures, and failed to ensure the food was stored, prepared/served under sanitary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 3, 4). Findings include: A facility policy for controlled substances, dated August 27, 2024, indicated that the charge nurse on duty maintains the keys to controlled substance containers. Controlled medications are to be wasted or disposed of in the presence of the nurse and a witness who also signs the disposition sheet. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated August 9, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, had pain, and received an opioid (a controlled pain medication). Current physician's orders for Resident 3, included an order for the resident to receive 5 milligrams (mg) of oxycodone every eight hours as needed for pain rated between 5-10 (a numeric scale with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve and store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure that outdated or expired food was removed from the refrigerator and failing to ensure that dietary staff wore hair coverings that completely covered their hair during food handling. Findings include: Observations in the main cooler on January 29, 2024, at 9:09 a.m. revealed a container of strawberries with a white substance (mold) all over them. Interview with the Dietary Director on January 29, 2024, at 9:09 a.m. confirmed that the strawberries had white mold all over them and then removed them from the cooler. The facility's dietary policy regarding personal hygiene, dated November 30, 2023, revealed that staff members will have their hair off the shoulders, confined in a hair net or cap, and facial hair properly restrained. Observations in the kitchen on February 1, 2024, at 12:21 p.m. revealed dietary staff preparing meal trays for delivery to the units…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment was maintained in a homelike manner in two of four resident lounge/activity/dining areas (B and C Hall lounge/activity/dining areas). Findings include: Observations in the B Hall resident lounge/activity/dining area on January 29, 2024, at 12:10 p.m. revealed that there were three residents being fed by staff, and there were 10 wheelchairs and two rollators stored in the corner by the windows. Observations on January 30, 2024, at 12:15 p.m. revealed that there were five residents in the dining area eating lunch, and there were six wheelchairs and two rollators stored in the corner by the windows. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 1 on January 30, 2024, at 12:30 p.m. confirmed the wheelchairs and rollators were stored in the dining room and the staff did not know where else to store them when not in use. Observations in the C Hall resident lounge/activity/dining area on January 29, 2024, at 12:07 p.m. revealed that there were three residents in the room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments for nine of 48 residents reviewed (Residents 23, 31, 56, 63, 65, 80, 83, 84, 86). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, revealed that Section O0110K (b) (Hospice Care) was to be coded if hospice services were provided while a resident of the facility and within the last 14 days. Physician's orders for Resident 23, dated August 20, 2021, included an order for the resident to receive hospice Care Services. A current care plan for Resident 23 included a plan of care to provide hospice care to the resident. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 23, dated November 30, 2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized interventions to address resident care needs for four of 48 residents reviewed (Residents 61, 65, 80, 84). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated November 30, 2023, revealed that a comprehensive care plan for each resident will be developed within seven days of completion of the MDS and be individualized to the resident's care needs. A nursing note, dated September 14, 2023, at 1:50 p.m. revealed that Resident 61 was admitted from the hospital and had a pacemaker (a small medical device implanted under the skin that delivers electrical impulses to the heart to help control abnormal heart rhythms) inserted. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 61, dated January 6, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and had a pacemaker. As of February 1, 2024, there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were assessed and received trauma-informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers for residents with the diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a mental and behavioral disorder that develops related to a terrifying event) for three of 48 residents reviewed (Residents 65, 80, 84) Findings include: The facility's policy regarding Trauma Informed Care, dated November 30, 2023, revealed the facility will complete an assessment that involves an in-depth process of evaluating the presence of symptoms, their relationship to trauma, as well as the identification of triggers. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 65, dated December 5, 2023, revealed that the resident was was cognitively impaired and had a diagnosis which included Parkinson's disease and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD a real disorder that develops when a person has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items at palatable temperatures. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding hot foods, dated November 30, 2023, revealed that dietary staff will serve all hot foods at 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or above and ensure that the food is palatable. An interview with a group of residents on January 30, 2024, at 3:30 p.m. revealed that the food served by the facility was sometimes bland and was sometimes served cold. Observations of the lunch meal service in the main kitchen on February 1, 2024, revealed that the C-Wing cart containing a test tray left the main kitchen at 12:36 p.m. and arrived on C-Wing at 12:38 p.m. Trays were passed to the residents that were in their rooms and in the common area at the end of the hall. The last resident was served at 12:56 a.m. The test tray was removed from the cart at 12:56 a.m. and the temperature of the milk was 45.1 degrees F, the coffee was 140 degrees F, the zucchini was 129.3 degrees F,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' clinical records were complete and accurately documented for one of 48 residents reviewed (Resident 71). Findings include: Physician's orders for Resident 71, dated January 4, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive one 10 milligram (mg) tablet of Midodrine (used to treat low blood pressure) three times per day for hypotension (low blood pressure) and staff was to hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure (the top number of the blood pressure) was greater than 120 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Medication Administration Records (MAR's) for Resident 71, dated January 2024, revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 7 documented as administering the 10 mg of Midodrine to the resident on January 12, 2024, at 8:00 a.m. for a blood pressure reading of 138/72 mmHg, and at 1:00 p.m. for a blood pressure reading of 138/78 mmHg; on January 15, 2024, at 1:00 p.m. for a blood pressure reading of 126/62 mmHg; on Janaury 24, 2024, at 1:00 p.m. for a blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of correction for the State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending February 24, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of corrections that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending February 1, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to a failure to complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of residents' abilities and care needs) accurately, to develop comprehensive care plans, following physician's orders, and to prepare and store food under sanitary conditions. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff followed the facility's policy regarding reporting an allegation of physical abuse in a timely manner for one of 48 residents reviewed (Resident 65). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding abuse, dated November 30, 2023, indicated that employees, facility consultants and/or attending physicians must immediately report any suspected abuse or incidents of abuse to the Director of Nursing. In the absence of the Director of Nursing such reports may be made to the nurse supervisor on duty. Any individual observing an incident of resident abuse or suspecting resident abuse must immediately report such incident to the Nursing Home Administrator, Director of Nursing, or charge nurse. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 65, dated December 5, 2023, revealed that the resident was was cognitively impaired and had a diagnosis which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan was developed for one of 48 residents reviewed (Resident 94) who was a recent admission. Findings include: A nursing note for Resident 94, dated January 23, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted from a hospital setting and was alert and oriented to person, place and time. Physician's orders for Resident 94, dated January 23, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive four liters of oxygen via nasal cannula (a tube that is inserted into the nares to delivery oxygen). Observations and an interview with Resident 94 on January 29, 2024, at 12:02 p.m. revealed that the resident was sitting in his wheelchair watching television and was receiving oxygen by nasal canula. The resident was admitted for a short-term stay to receive therapy services. He said he was admitted from the hospital after being in another facility for respite care. The baseline care plan for Resident 94, initiated on January 23, 2024, was incomplete and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for two of 48 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 26). Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated November 16, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included high blood pressure and dementia. A care plan, dated January 26, 2023, revealed that the resident and her family preferred that she receive showers twice a week. A review of the December 2023 and January 2024 shower record revealed that the resident was receiving bed baths. A nursing note, dated January 30, 2024, revealed that the nurse spoke with the resident's daughter, and she stated she told staff to bed bath the resident whenever they needed to. An interview with Director of Nursing on January 30, 2024, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to ensure that physician's orders were followed for two of 48 residents reviewed (Residents 23, 83). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 23, dated November 30, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, was always incontinent of bowel, and had diagnoses that included dementia. A care plan for Resident 23, dated July 29, 2022, revealed that the resident was to receive incontinent care every two to three hours and as needed. Physician's orders for Resident 23, dated April 2, 2021, included orders for the resident to receive 30 milliliters (ml) of Milk of Magnesia (MOM - an oral laxative) as needed for constipation if no bowel movement by the third day (9 shifts); one Dulcolax suppository (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, revealed that if a wander/elopement alarm was used, then Section P0200E was to be coded as (0) not used, (1) used less than daily, or (2) used daily. A physician's order and care plan for Resident 2, dated November 2, 2023, included orders for the resident to use a Wanderguard (device that alarms when close to exit doors) and to check the placement/function and skin integrity every shift. The resident's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for November and December 2023 revealed that the resident used a Wanderguard from November 2 throiugh December 31, 2023. A quarterly MDS assessment for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' clinical records were complete and accurately documented for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's policy for Charting and Documentation, dated November 30, 2023, indicated that all services provided to the resident would be documented in the resident's medical record. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated January 13, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact. An interview with Resident 1 on January 25, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. revealed that while she was a resident she was able to leave the building without staff knowing in an attempt to go home. She stated that she observed staff exiting the building and knew just what to do in order to get out the door without it alarming. She then exited the door on the unit and walked around the building until staff found her and returned her to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for four of 54 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 63, 75, 85). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides guidance and instructions for the completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, revealed that Sections H0100 through H0300 were to gather information on the use of bowel and bladder appliances and urinary and bowel continence. Section H0100 was to be coded for each appliance that was used at any time in the past seven days. Select none of the above if none of the appliances A-D were used in the past seven days. Section H0400 was to be coded nine (9), not rated if during the seven-day look-back period the resident had an ostomy (a hole/stoma in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ABRAHAM SMILOW — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GHC SNF OPCO HOLDING COMPANY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2023
SMILOW, ABRAHAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF95%since 04/01/2023
HILLEL TROPPER 2016 IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
LADS AVENUE ASSOCIATES LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
MOSHE TROOPER 2016 IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
T3 INITIATIVES LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2023
TRAVITSKY, BARUCHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
ANDOLINA, MELISSAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
SCHARF, BRETTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
GHC CONSULTING COMPANY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
GHC SNF PROPCO HOLDING COMPANY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
HILLVIEW SNF PROPCO COMPANY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
HMTL LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2025
T3 REAL ESTATE INITIATIVES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$913K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 6%Other / private 28%

This home reported $913K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$303per resident / day
operating cost
$9,208per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$282per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395241. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next