Crawford Care Center
20881 State Highway 198, Saegertown, PA 16433 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 157 certified beds · (814) 763-2445 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $151,253 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-02)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 30.1% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.8% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.4% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.5% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.8% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 36.4% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.5% | 93.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.6% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 29.1% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.7% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 30.9% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 3.1% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.6% | 9.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.34 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.00 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.2%CMS range 31.4–56.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 7.3–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 4.1–15.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.08 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 157 beds and averages 118.5 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, facility documents, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement sufficient monitoring and supervision to prevent elopement (when a resident leaves a safe care setting without staff knowledge) and failed to adequately implement search procedures related to an elopement. This failure placed residents at the facility in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for one of one residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Elopements and Wandering Residents dated 1/22/26, indicated This facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision. Alarms are not a replacement for necessary supervision. Staff are to be vigilant in responding to alarms in a timely manner. The facility shall establish and utilize a systemic approach to monitoring and managing residents at risk for elopement., implementing interventions to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies and documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program by failing to follow infection control guidelines from the Pennsylvania Department of Health (PA DOH) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination during the COVID-19 pandemic. This failure placed the facility in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for 20 of 20 residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, and R20). Findings include: Review of the Pennsylvania Department of Health COVID-19 Infection Control and Outbreak Response Toolkit for Long-Term Care Version 1.1 dated February 2024, and expanded from infection prevention and control guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for nursing homes and Long-Term Care Facilities revealed the following: During the Outbreak: COVID-19 Outbreak Management and Control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility records and job descriptions, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to effectively manage the facility to implement sufficient monitoring and supervision to prevent an elopement.Findings include: The job description for the NHA revealed that the NHA's purpose is to establish and maintain systems that are effective and efficient to operate the facility in a manner to safely meet resident needs in compliance with federal, state, and local requirements. The primary functions and responsibilities of the nursing home administrator include overseeing staff, personal, financial matters, medical care, medical supplies, and facilities. The job description for the DON revealed that the DON's primary purpose is to provide nursing management, set resident care standards for all direct care providers and provide complete supervision and management for the nursing department. The primary functions and responsibilities of the DON include setting resident care standards in accordance with acceptable current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy (explanation of how long a bed can be held during a leave of absence and the cost per day), and failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider upon transfer to the hospital for five of five residents reviewed (Residents R2, R3, R5, R7, and R56). Findings include: Facility policy entitled Bed-Hold Notice dated 1/22/26, indicated that It is the policy of this facility to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident representative regarding bed hold practices both well in advance, and at the time of, a transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave. The policy further revealed In the event of an emergency transfer of a resident, the facility will provide written notice of the facility's bed-hold policies to the resident and/or the resident representative within 24 hours.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-30 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the attending physician documented required visits by writing, signing, and dating a physician progress note for each visit for 12 of 24 residents reviewed (Residents R2, R3, R5, R11, R13, R14, R25, R39, R42, R58, R60, and R94).Findings include: Facility policy entitled Physician Visits and Physician Delegation dated 1/22/26, revealed The resident must be seen at least once every 30 calendar days for the first 90 calendar days after admission and at least every 60 days thereafter by physician or physician delegate as appropriate by state law, Date, write, and sign a progress note for each visit and A physician visit is considered timely if it occurs no later than 10 days after the date the visit was required. Resident R2's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/4/24, with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a condition that prevents airflow to the lungs resulting in difficulty breathing), bipolar disorder (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician alternated required resident visits with the nurse practitioner or physician's assistant for 16 of 24 residents reviewed (Residents R2, R3, R5, R7, R9, R11, R12, R13, R14, R39, R42, R55, R58, R60, R61, and R94). Findings include: Facility policy entitled Physician Visits and Physician Delegation dated 1/22/26, revealed The resident must be seen at least once every 30 calendar days for the first 90 calendar days after admission and at least every 60 days thereafter by physician or physician delegate as appropriate by state law and At the option of the physician, required visits in SNFs (skilled nursing facilities), after the initial visit, may alternate between personal visits by the physician and visits by a physician assistant, nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist that is acting within scope of practice defined by State law and under the supervision of the physician. ' Resident R2's clinical record revealed an admission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of a facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary operations in the main kitchen and failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with standards for food safety in the main kitchen and three resident pantries reviewed (Units 100/200, 200/300, and 400/500).Findings include: Review of policy entitled Date Marking for Food Safety dated 1/22/26, indicated The food shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which food shall be consumed or discarded. The discard date or day may not exceed the manufacturer's use-by-date, or four days, whichever is earliest. The date of opening or preparation counts as day 1. Review of facility policy entitled Environment dated 1/22/26, indicated The Dining Service Director will ensure that the kitchen is maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, including floors, walls, ceilings, lighting, and ventilation. Review of facility policy entitled Equipment dated 1/22/26, indicated All non-food contact equipment will be cleaned and free of debris.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders and residents Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a legal document specifying the resident/responsible party choices regarding life-sustaining treatments) were consistent for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident R123).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Communication of Code Status dated [DATE], indicated When an order is written pertaining to a resident's presence or absence of an Advance Directive, the directions will be clearly documented in designated sections of the medical record. Review of Resident R123's clinical record revealed an admission date of [DATE], with diagnoses that include hypertension (high blood pressure), parkinsonism (a syndrome with symptoms of tremors, stiff muscles, and slow and difficult movement because of disease of the nervous system), and chronic kidney disease (a disease that affects the kidney's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence that pharmacist medication regimen reviews were reviewed and signed by a physician prior to the administration of an as needed (PRN) psychotropic (mind altering) medication for one of one residents reviewed (Resident R109). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Psychotropic Medication Use Process Auditing Chart Review with an annual policy review of 1/22/2026, revealed is there a practitioner's order documented for the psychotropic medication. Are orders for antipsychotic medications only time limited to 14 days? If it needs to be extended, has the practitioner evaluated the resident and documented on the resident prior to writing the new PRN order? Review of Resident R109's clinical record revealed an admission date of 4/30/25, with diagnoses that included Cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side (a group of conditions that affect blood vessels and blood circulation to the brain, restricting oxygen and often causing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary to the resident and/or representative for two of 12 residents reviewed (Residents R12 and R7).Findings include: Facility policy entitled Baseline Care Plan dated 1/22/26, indicated A written summary of the baseline care plan shall be provided to the resident and representative in a language that the resident/representative can understand. The summary shall include, at a minimum, the following: The initial goals of the resident, a Summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions, and Any services and treatments to be administered by the facility and personnel acting on behalf of the facility. And The person providing the written summary of the baseline care plan shall: Obtain a signature from the resident/representative to verify that the summary was provided and Make a copy of the summary for the medical record. Resident R12's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/24/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident R11).Findings include: Facility policy entitled Comprehensive Care Plans date 1/22/26, indicated It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and ALL services that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment and meet professional standards of quality. Resident R11's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/8/25, with diagnoses that included Sleep Apnea (a sleep disorder that causes breathing to stop and start multiple times during sleep), Diabetes (a health condition caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), and High Blood Pressure. Resident R11's physician's orders dated 5/9/25, revealed CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review and/or revise resident care plans for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident R11). Findings include: Facility policy entitled Comprehensive Care Plans' dated 1/22/26, revealed The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS assessment. Facility policy entitled Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change dated 1/22/26, revealed The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed, and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a change. And The care plan will be updated with new or modified interventions. Resident R11's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/8/25, with diagnoses that included Sleep Apnea (a sleep disorder that causes breathing to stop and start multiple times during sleep), Diabetes (a health condition caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), and High Blood Pressure. Resident R11's care plan for problem area of Respiratory included an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to a medication gradual dose reduction (GDR-lowering a high-risk medication to determine if a person can function safely on a lower dose) and failed to administer pain medication timely resulting in a delay in treatment for two of 24 residents reviewed (Residents R3 and R5).Findings include:Facility policy entitled, Consulting Physician/Practitioner Orders dated 1/22/26, revealed .For consulting physician/practitioner orders received in writing or via fax, the nurse in a timely manner will:Call the attending physician to verify the order.Document the verification order by entering the order and the time, date, and signature on the physician order sheet.Follow facility procedures for verbal or telephone orders including: noting the order, submitting to pharmacy, and transcribing to medication or treatment administration record.Review of Resident R3's clinical record revealed an admission date of 7/26/24, with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility documents, and facility meal schedule, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that alternate meals were served comparable to normal mealtime in accordance with resident preference and request for two of 24 residents (Residents R55 and R123).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Dining and Food Preferences dated 1/22/26, revealed The alternate meal and/or beverage selection will be provided in a timely manner. Review of facility meal schedule revealed that the scheduled time for lunch delivery starts at 11:00 a.m. and the last delivery is at 1:15 p.m. which identified that tray line would not be completed until 1:15 p.m. Observations on 4/27/26, and 4/28/26, revealed a sign on the dining services door indicating Alternate meals will be made at the end of tray line. Tray line does not stop! During an interview on 4/27/26, at approximately 12:45 p.m. Resident R55 stated, I have asked for an alternate meal, and it has taken over 30 minutes to get it, and it was only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate urinary catheter (tubing inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a bag) care to help prevent urinary tract infections for one resident reviewed for catheter care (Resident R12).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Indwelling Catheter Use and Removal dated 1/22/26, revealed If an indwelling catheter is in use, the facility will provide appropriate care for the catheter in accordance with current professional standards of practice and resident care policies and procedures that include but are not limited to: Insertion, ongoing care and catheter removal protocols that adhere to professional standards of practice and infection prevention and control procedures. Review of Resident R12's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/24/25, with diagnoses that include Parkinson's (a chronic and progressive movement disorder that causes shaking, slows a person's ability to move and worsens over time), drug induced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies and International Plumbing Code, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to safely store food containers, and prepare, serve and store food in a safe and sanitary manner in the main kitchen; failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination (transfer of harmful substances or disease-causing organisms to food from unclean hands or objects) during food preparation; and failed to maintain safe storage of ice for residents for one of one ice machines located in the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the International Plumbing Code Chapter Eight dated 2018, revealed that devices that store ice and that discharge to the drainage system shall be provided with protection against backflow, flooding, fouling, contamination and stoppage of the drain; and when equipment discharges potable clear water waste (fit for human consumption) to the building drainage system, the discharge shall be through an indirect pipe by means of an air gap. A facility policy entitled Equipment dated 1/16/25, indicated that all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary to the resident and/or representative for five of 13 residents reviewed (Residents R3, R18, R30, R64, and Closed Record CR110). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Baseline Care Plan dated 1/16/25, indicated A written summary of the baseline care plan shall be provided to the resident and representative . and This will be provided by completion of the comprehensive care plan. Review of Resident R3's clinical record revealed an admission date of 7/15/24, with diagnosis that included anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be nervous, uneasy, or worried about something or someone), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Resident R3's clinical record lacked evidence that a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary was provided to Resident R3 and/or his/her representative. Review of Resident R18's clinical record revealed an admission date of 9/28/24, with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide oxygen according to physician's orders and failed to promote cleanliness and help prevent the spread of infection for four of 25 residents reviewed for respiratory services (Residents R30, R44, R48, and R64). Findings include: A facility policy dated 1/16/25, entitled Oxygen Concentrator revealed the purpose of the policy is to establish responsibilities for the care and use of oxygen concentrators. An oxygen concentrator is a medical device that extracts oxygen from room air by filtering out or separating the nitrogen from the oxygen. The oxygen passes through a filter system and is then stored within the device for delivery based on the flow meter setting. Care of the Concentrator. Filters on concentrators to be cleaned weekly. The main body cabinet should be dusted when needed and can be wiped clean with a damp cloth and mild household cleaner if necessary. Change oxygen tubing and mask/cannula weekly and as needed. Change humidifier…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician visits were conducted at least once every 60 days for three of three residents reviewed (R15, R19, and R26). Findings include: Interview on 4/15/25, at 1:35 p.m. with Resident R15 revealed that he/she had not seen their physician since his/her prior physician had stopped coming to the facility. He/she expressed that he/she has only seen the nurse practitioner. Interview on 4/15/25, at 2:00 p.m. with Resident R19 revealed that he/she has only seen a nurse practitioner since their last physician stopped coming to the facility, which was sometime last summer. Interview on 4/14/25, at 12:15 p.m. with Resident R26 revealed that he/she has not seen their physician since his/her prior physician stopped coming to the facility. He/she expressed that the last time they saw their physician was sometime last summer. He/she expressed that they have only seen the nurse practitioner. Interviews on 4/15/25, at 2:00 p.m. during resident council meeting revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that waste was properly contained in dumpsters or compactors with lids or otherwise covered, and the garbage storage area was maintained in a sanitary condition to prevent the potential of harborage and feeding of pests for one of one garbage storage areas. Findings include: A facility policy entitled Disposal of Garbage and Refuse dated 1/16/25, indicated that refuse containers and dumpsters kept outside the facility shall be designed and constructed to have tightly fitting lids, doors, or cover; containers and dumpsters shall be kept covered when not being loaded; dumpsters shall be emptied according to the facility contract and garbage should not accumulate or be left outside the dumpster. Observation on 4/14/25, at 1:35 p.m. revealed four plastic rolling carts in proximity of the facility loading dock were overflowing with garbage bags. Three of the plastic carts contained clear unsealed garbage bags of cans with food remaining in a number the cans, and one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a physician's order and POLST (Pennsylvania Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) were identical to indicate the correct code status as Full Code (CPR/Attempt Resuscitation) or Do Not Resuscitate (DNR/Do Not Attempt Resuscitation-Allow Natural Death) for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R18). Findings include: Facility policy entitled, Communication of Code Status dated [DATE], indicated it is the policy of this facility to adhere to residents' rights to formulate advance directives. In accordance to these rights, this facility will implement procedures to communicate a resident's code status to those individuals who need to know this information. When an order is written pertaining to a resident's presence or absence of an Advance Directive, the directions will be clearly documented in designated sections of the medical record. Examples of directions to be documented include, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies and documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a clean environment for one of one resident equipment observed (Resident R64). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Housekeeping In-Service dated 1/16/25, indicated Dust Mop: The entire floor needs to be dust mopped . and Damp mop: The most important area of a patient's room to disinfect the floor. Review of resident R64's clinical record revealed an admission date of 8/23/24, with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (condition when your lungs do not have adequate air flow), anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be nervous, uneasy, or worried about something or someone), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Observations on 4/14/25, at 12:25 p.m., 1:55 p.m., and 2:50 p.m. revealed that upon entering Resident R64's room and walking across the floor, a sticky sound was heard with each step. Further observations of Resident R64's room revealed a large…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a respiratory care plan for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents R30 and R64). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Comprehensive Care Plans dated 1/16/25, indicated The comprehensive care plan will describe . The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, and The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised . Review of Resident R30's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/4/24, with diagnoses that included anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be nervous, uneasy, or worried about something or someone), obstructive sleep apnea (a condition when a person repeatedly stops and starts breathing when they are sleeping), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident R30's physician's orders revealed an order dated 1/31/25, for oxygen 2 lpm (liters per minute) via nasal cannula (oxygen tubing that has prongs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to follow the plan of care for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident R48). Findings include: Resident R48's clinical record revealed an admission date of 7/02/18, with diagnoses including polyosteoarthritis (a form of arthritis that affects multiple joints at the same time), dementia, and dizziness. A care plan entitled Safety/Fall Risk included an intervention dated 8/06/24, to place his/her bed against the wall. Observations on 4/14/25, at 3:05 p.m. and 4/15/25, at 9:52 a.m. revealed Resident R48's bed was positioned with a bedside table between the bed and the wall, and the bed was not placed against the wall as care planned. During an interview on 4/15/25, at 10:20 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E5 confirmed that Resident R48's bed was not positioned against the wall. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and manufacturer's guidelines, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately discard outdated medications for one of three medication carts reviewed and one of two medication rooms reviewed (500 and 100 hall medication carts and 500/600 medication room). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Multi-Dose Vials dated 1/16/25, indicated Multi-dose vials will be labeled with date open. Medications will be discarded . Insulin is 28 days from date open. Review of manufacturer's guidelines revealed that an open pen of Lispro Insulin must be used within 28 days after opening or be discarded. Review of manufacturer's guidelines revealed that an open pen of Lantus/Basaglar Insulin must be used within 28 days after opening or be discarded, even if the vial still contains insulin. Review of manufacturer's guidelines revealed that an open vial of Tubersol (solution to test for tuberculosis) should be discarded within 30 days after opening. Observation of drug storage on 4/14/25, at 12:40 p.m. of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-06 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or resident representative was offered the opportunity to participate in the development, review, and/or revision of their person-centered care plan for three of three residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, and R3). Findings include: Facility policy entitled Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team, dated 1/18/24, indicated the interdisciplinary team is responsible for the development of resident care plans. Resident care plans are developed according to the timeframes and criteria established by 483.21. The resident, the resident's family and/or resident's legal representative/guardian or surrogate are encouraged to participate in the development of and revisions to the resident's care plan. Facility policy entitled Quarterly Assessments and Care Plan, dated 1/18/24, indicated Quarterly MDS assessments are conducted to track the resident's status between comprehensive assessments to ensure critical indicators of gradual change in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy, facility written menus, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their planned menu. Findings include: Facility policy entitled, Menus dated 1/18/24, revealed Menus will be planned in advance to meet the nutritional needs of the residents/patients in accordance with established national guidelines. Menus will be developed to meet the criteria through the use of an approved menu planning guide. Menus will be served as written, unless a substitution is provided in response to preference, unavailability of an item, or a special meal. A menu substitution log will be maintained on file. Facility menus revealed a meal consisting of smothered chicken thigh, whole kernel corn, oven browned potatoes, cornbread, sliced pears and coffee or hot tea was to be provided for the residents' lunch meal on 12/30/24. Observations of the 400-unit meal service on 12/30/24, at 1:15 p.m. revealed five residents received mashed potatoes instead of oven browned potatoes. During an interview on 12/30/24, at 1:17 p.m. the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy, facility meal schedules, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to follow their schedule for frequency of resident meals. Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Meal Distribution, dated 1/18/24, revealed meals are transported to the dining locations in a manner that ensures proper temperature maintenance, protects against contamination, and are delivered in a timely and accurate manner. Facility posting entitled, Tray Service Schedule noted: Lunch: 11:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. - Main Dining Room, 11:45 a.m. - 500 Hall, 11:55 a.m. - 600 Hall, 12:05 p.m. - 100 Hall, 12:15 p.m. - 300 Hall, 12:25 p.m. - 400 Hall. Observations on 12/30/24, at 12:25 p.m., 12:35 p.m., and 12:50 p.m. of the dining rooms for the 300 and 400 units revealed residents sitting in their wheelchairs and dining room chairs awaiting their lunch meal (both units are located in a secured dementia unit). At 12:57 p.m. (42 minutes beyond the scheduled service) the meal cart for the 300-unit dining room arrived with resident meals, followed by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of one residents reviewed regarding an elopement (Resident R30). Findings include: Facility policy entitled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised March 2022, included: the comprehensive, person-centered care plan includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; care plan interventions are chosen only after data gathering, proper sequencing of events, careful consideration of the relation ship between the resident's problem areas and their causes, and relevant to clinical decision making. Resident R30's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/12/24, with diagnoses that included dementia, weakness, unsteady on feet, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and repeated falls. Resident R30's clinical record revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and documentation and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an elopement (unauthorized leave from a safe area) for one of one residents reviewed for elopements (Resident R30). Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Wandering and Elopements revised March 2019, revealed that when the resident returns to the facility, the Director of Nursing or charge nurse shall: examine the resident for injuries; contact the attending physician and report findings and conditions of the resident; notify the resident's legal representative; complete and file an incident report; and document relevant information in the resident's medical record. Resident R30's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/12/24, with diagnoses that included dementia, weakness, unsteady on feet, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and repeated falls. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (federally mandated process that assesses the clinical needs and functional capabilities of residents in nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) did not effectively manage the facility to make certain that proper infection control procedures were followed to protect residents from cross-contamination, infections, viruses and disease in the facility. Findings include: The job description for the NHA revealed that the purpose of this position is to establish and maintain systems that are effective and efficient to operate the facility in a manner to safety meet resident needs in compliance with federal, state, and local requirements. The job description for the DON revealed that the purpose of this position is to provide nursing management, set resident care standards for all direct care providers and provide complete supervision and management for the nursing department. Based on the findings in this report that identified that the facility failed to consistently maintain an infection prevention and control program to mitigate or potentially control the spread…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-02 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of clinical records and facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) performed the duties of the position to adequately implement an infection control program to detect and prevent the spread of COVID-19. Findings include: The job description for the IP revealed that the purpose of this position is to implement, coordinate, and ensure that the facility's infection prevention and control program is effective and in compliance with all state and federal regulations. Pennsylvania Department of Health COVID-19 Infection Control and Outbreak Response Toolkit for Long-Term Care Version 1.1 dated February 2024, and expanded from infection prevention and control guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for nursing homes and Long-Term Care Facilities. During the Outbreak: COVID-19 Outbreak Management and Control Measures included: 1.Identify and Isolate First Case. a. Isolate with transmission-based precautions (TBP) on COVID-19 Care Unit in accordance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to allow residents the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident R22). Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Discharge Summary and Plan, revised 10/2022, indicated when a resident's discharge is anticipated, a post-discharge plan is developed to assist the resident with discharge, every resident is evaluated for his/her discharge needs and has an individualized post-discharge plan, and includes: where the resident plans to reside; arrangements that have been made for follow-up care and services; description of the resident's stated discharge goals; degree of caregiver/support person availability, capacity and capability to perform required care; how the interdisciplinary team will support the resident in the transition to post-discharge care; what factors may make the resident vulnerable to preventable readmission; and how those…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to issue the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage liability and/or appeal notice, and Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN form - provides information to residents so they can decide if they wish to continue skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility) to the resident, or the resident's representative, following the end of Medicare covered services for two of two residents reviewed who remained in the facility for long-term care (Residents R6, R52) and one resident who was discharged from the facility (Closed Record Resident CR190). Findings include: Resident R6's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/25/24, with diagnoses including broken vertebrae, colon cancer, repeated falls, and bacterial skin infection of the left toe. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- standardized assessment tool that measures health status in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary to the resident and/or representative for eight of 22 residents reviewed (Residents R30, R14, R81, R3, R41, R69, R74, and R83). Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Care Plans - Baseline dated 2/12/24, revealed The resident and/or representative are provided a written summary of the baseline care plan (in a language that the resident/representative can understand) that includes, but is not limited to the following: a. The stated goals and objectives of the resident; b. A summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions; c. Any services and treatments to be administered by the facility and personnel acting on behalf of the facility; and d. Any updated information based on the details of the comprehensive care plan, as necessary. Resident R30's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/29/24, with diagnoses that included heart failure (a condition where the heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans to reflect the current care and services for nine of 22 residents reviewed (Residents R40, R14, R30, R37, R81, R41, R43, R74, and R83). Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Care Plans, comprehensive Person-Centered, dated 2/12/24, indicated that the interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan: when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; when the desired outcome is not met; when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and at least quarterly (every three months) in conjunction with the required quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set- standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents). Resident R81's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/21/24, with diagnoses that included vitamin D deficiency, major depressive disorder, and pneumonia. Resident R81's care plan revealed a target date of 2/21/24, indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clinical rationale for the continued use of a PRN (as needed) psychotropic (affecting the mind) medication beyond 14-days and failed to provide evidence that non-pharmacological interventions (interventions attempted to calm a resident other than medication) were attempted prior to the administration of a PRN psychotropic medication for four of 22 residents reviewed (Residents R81, R41, R43, and R2). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Psychotropic Medication Use dated 2/12/24, revealed that Non-pharmacological approaches are used (unless contraindicated) to minimize the need for medications, permit the lowest possible dose, and allow for discontinuation of medications when possible For psychotropic medications that are NOT antipsychotics: If the prescriber or attending physician believes it is appropriate to extend the PRN order beyond 14 days, he or she will document the rationale for extending the use and include the duration of the PRN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent the opportunity for potential unauthorized access of medications for one of five medication carts (Primrose Lane- memory care unit), failed to label a multi-dose insulin pen (medication to treat elevated blood sugar levels) with the date it was opened in one of five medication carts (Maple Lane), and failed to ensure that medications subject to abuse were stored in separately locked, permanently affixed compartment in one of three medication refrigerators (Blue Unit). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Administering Medications dated 2/12/24, indicated that the medication cart must be kept closed and locked when out of the nurse's view. Review of the facility policy entitled Medication Labeling and Storage dated 2/12/24, indicated that multi-dose vials/containers are dated when opened and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date. Review of the facility policy entitled Controlled Substances dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence of a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting for one of four quarterly QAPI Committee meetings reviewed occurring in 2023 and 2024 (First Quarter of 2024). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program dated 2/27/2023 stated, The committee meets monthly to review reports, evaluate data and monitor QAPI-related activities and make adjustments to the plans. Review of the QAPI Committee Attendance Records revealed no evidence of a quarterly meeting for the First Quarter of 2024. During an interview on 5/01/24, at 11:30 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that there was no evidence of a QAPI Committee meeting regarding the First Quarter meetings of 2024. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and clinical records, and staff and family interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to fully inform and discuss the change of treatments for the medical management of a resident's clinical status and/or discuss alternate treatment options preferred by the resident's representative in advance of these changes for one of five residents reviewed for pharmacy recommendations (Resident R38). Findings include: The facility's admission packet provided to residents/representatives on admission revealed: all residents have the right to equal access to quality care regardless of diagnosis, severity of condition, or payment source; have to right to be fully informed of your medical condition in a language you can understand, and to participate in your person-centered care planning and treatment; and the right to refuse and/or discontinue medications and treatments (but this could be harmful to your health). Resident R38's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/26/17, with diagnoses including secondary hyperaldosteronism…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of resident care needs) to accurately reflect the resident's status at the time of the assessment for two of 22 residents reviewed (Residents R14 and R57). Findings include: Resident R14's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/27/24, with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (a diseases where the kidneys no longer work to meet the body's needs), hypokalemia (low potassium levels), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Resident R14's clinical record revealed that dialysis was ordered on 3/27/24, and Resident R14 received dialysis treatments on 3/30/24, and 4/2/24. The five day MDS dated [DATE], Section O0100 J. Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs category, dialysis was marked No indicating Resident R14 was not receiving dialysis treatments. Resident R57's clinical record revealed an admission date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for two of 22 residents reviewed (Residents R14 and R64 ). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered dated 2/12/24, indicated The comprehensive person centered care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the required MDS assessment, and no more than 21 days after admission. Review of Resident R14's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/27/24, with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (a diseases where the kidneys no longer work to meet the body's needs), hypokalemia (low potassium levels), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident R14's physician orders revealed an order for dialysis every Tuesday and Saturday. Further review of Resident R14's person centered plans of care revealed only a plan of care for nutrition. Review of Resident R64' clinical record revealed an admission date of 4/10/24, with a diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of clinical records and facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to promote cleanliness and help prevent the spread of infection regarding respiratory care equipment according to physician's orders for two of two residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents R43 and R69) Finding include: Review of facility policy entitled Oxygen Administration dated 2/12/24, indicated tubing is to be changed weekly and dated, and filters on concentrators to be cleaned weekly with tubing change. Review of Resident R43's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/21/17, with diagnoses that included dementia (a disease that affects short term memory and the ability to think logically), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a disease that obstructs air flow from the lungs), and peripheral vascular disease (a disease where your veins have trouble sending blood from your limbs back to your heart). Review of Resident R43's physician orders revealed an order dated 11/1/23, for oxygen at two liters per minute as needed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility contract, clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain records relating to dialysis communication for one of one residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident R14). Findings include: Review of dialysis contract dated 2/12/24, indicated Designated Resident Information, Facility shall ensure that all appropriate medical, social, administrative, and other information accompany all designated residents at the time of transfer to center. This information shall include . appropriate medical records . treatments being provided to designated resident, including medications and any changes in the patient's condition, change of medication, diet, or fluid intake . any other information that will facilitate the adequate coordination of care as reasonably determined by center. Review of facility's dialysis communication form entitled Dialysis/Observation Communication Form revealed that the top section was to be completed by the facility, which included treatments being provided to the resident, including medications and any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0851 — isolatedElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility requirements according to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), review of Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Reports and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to electronically submit direct care staffing information for one of the last four quarters (Quarter Four of 2023). Findings include: Review of Section 6106 of the ACA requires facilities to electronically submit direct care staffing information (including agency and contract staff) based on payroll and other auditable data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Submission must be received by the end of the 45th calendar day (11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time) after the last day of each fiscal quarter to be considered timely. First quarter reporting includes data from October 1st through December 31st and is due by February 14th. Second quarter reporting includes data from January 1st through March 31st and is due by May 15th. Third quarter reporting includes data from April 1st through June 30th and is due by August 14th. Fourth quarter reporting includes July 1st…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and planned written menus, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, well-balanced diet that meets his/her daily nutritional needs for one of one meal observed (lunch meal 4/01/24) and three of three meals reviewed (lunch, dinner meal 4/01/24 and breakfast meal 4/02/24). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled, Resident Food Preferences, dated 2/12/24, revealed Individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team. Modifications to diet will only be ordered with the resident's or representative's consent. The food services department will offer a variety of foods at each scheduled meal, as well as access to nourishing snacks throughout the day and night. Review of the facility menu for cycle week 3 for the lunch meal on 4/01/24, revealed Chicken Pot Pie w/Biscuit, Alternate- Hamburger on a Bun-Lettuce & Tomato-Ketchup-Pickle Spear, Tossed Salad w/Dressing, Broccoli Florets, Tater Tots-Ketchup…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a bath/shower as resident preference for four of 26 residents reviewed (Residents R1, R4, R5, R6). Findings include: No policy was provided on baths/showers. Resident's R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 9/03/21, with diagnoses that included polyosteoarthritis (joint pain and stiffness), dysuria (discomfort, pain, or burning when urinating), hypothyroidism (a condition when the thyroid gland doesn't produce enough thyroid hormone), and presence of artificial eye. During an interview with Resident R1 on 4/01/24, at 1:25 p.m. he/she indicated their bath/shower was scheduled for Wednesday and Saturday evenings, but he/she has not received the scheduled bath/shower in at least the past 10 days. Resident R1 verbalized, I told several people that I would like my bath on the dayshift, due to more reliable staff work those hours. It all depends on who and how many are working if you get a bath or not. Resident was observed with greasy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for three of six residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, and R3). Findings include: Resident's R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 9/03/21, with diagnoses that included polyosteoarthritis (joint pain and stiffness), dysuria (discomfort, pain, or burning when urinating), hypothyroidism (a condition when the thyroid gland doesn't produce enough thyroid hormone), and presence of artificial eye. Review of Resident R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a physician order with start date of 2/25/22, Levothyroxine Sodium 100 micrograms (mcg) give one tablet by mouth one time a day for hypothyroidism. Resident R1's MAR further revealed for the month of March 2024 that his/her Levothyroxine Sodium 100 mcg was not administered per physician order on 3/03/24, 3/04/24, 3/06/24, 3/09/24, 3/11/24, 3/12/24, and 3/13/24. During an interview on 4/01/24, at 1:25 p.m. Resident R1 indicated he/she has not received his/her medication for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice and make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident for 11 of 11 residents reviewed for availability of food preferences (Residents R1-R11). Findings include: Review of Resident Council Meeting minutes dated 2/06/24, revealed: -resident concerns from two resident council members about having soup available daily. Review of the Results of the Investigation indicated that soup is offered on the current menus cycle, and one resident in the facility can receive soup for lunch and dinner per resident and family request. The Resolution lacked how the facility addressed the concerns how they directly related to the residents voicing the concerns and indicated that Resident is pleased with outcome but failed to indicate what the outcome was as it related to the residents voicing their concerns. -resident concerns from one resident council…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care), and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected the status of three of 27 residents reviewed (Residents R7, R11, and R120).Findings include: MDS instructions for section A2105 Discharge Status indicated to select the two-digit code that corresponds to the resident's discharge status. MDS instructions for section O0100b Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs while a resident indicated to check all of the following treatments, procedures, and programs that were performed while a resident of this facility and within the last 14-days. Instructions for section O0110G1 Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilator indicated to Code any type of CPAP (a machine that delivers a steady stream of pressurized air through a mask worn over the nose and/or mouth which keeps the airway open and ensure consistent oxygen flow.) or BiPAP ( machine that delivers pressurized air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-01-06 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, and facility provided documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident financial records were made available through quarterly statements for two of two residents reviewed (Residents R1 and R3). Findings include: Facility policy entitled Resident Personal Funds dated 1/18/24, revealed the resident has a right to manage his or her financial affairs to include the right to know, in advance, what charges a facility may impose against a resident's personal funds. Accounting and Records - The individual financial record must be available to the resident through quarterly statements and upon request. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 9/23/20, with diagnoses that included heart disease, bronchitis, obstructive and reflux uropathy (a condition where the flow of urine is blocked and flows backward from the bladder and sometimes into the kidneys), and maxillary sinusitis (a condition when the sinuses behind the cheekbones become inflamed or infected). Facility documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$151,253 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $151,253 — penalty dated 2024-08-02
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ABRAHAM SMILOW — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a private-equity firm. That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.
- LADS AVENUE ASSOCIATES LLC — private equity · 1.50% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRAWFORD CARE CENTER OPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 11/01/2023 |
| SMILOW, ABRAHAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 95% | since 11/01/2023 |
| PARK, DONALD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/12/2024 |
| ROHRBACH, CHARLES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| CCC CONSULTING COMPANY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2023 |
| CRAWFORD CARE PROPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2023 |
| HILLEL TROPPER 2016 IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2023 |
| LADS AVENUE ASSOCIATES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2023 |
| MOSHE TROOPER 2016 IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2023 |
| T3 REAL ESTATE INITIATIVES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2023 |
| TRAVITSKY, BARUCH | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395853. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.