Oakwood Heights Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 29.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 84.8 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-10-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation, and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident was free of neglect during care which resulted in actual harm of a laceration to the right forehead and an intraventricular hemorrhage (brain bleed) for one of 11 residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings include: The Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, dated 1/14/25, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property . Neglect means failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 8/18/19, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disorder that affects memory,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation, and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required level of assistance with bed mobility (rolling side to side or turning in bed) as identified in the plan of care, task order summary, and in accordance with facility policy which resulted in actual harm of a laceration to the right forehead and an intraventricular hemorrhage (brain bleed) for one of 11 residents reviewed (Resident R1). This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The Safe Resident Handling/Transfers policy, dated 1/14/25, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents are handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize risks for injury and provide and promote a safe, secure, and comfortable experience for the resident . Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 8/18/19, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disorder that affects memory, thinking, and behavior), Parkinsonism (movement disorder which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, investigation documents, and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe environment regarding mechanical lift sling sizing for one of three residents that utilize a mechanical lift reviewed (Resident R46), that resulted in actual harm and required staple repair for a head laceration. Findings include: The facility's policy Safe Resident Handling/Transfers, dated 1/14/25, indicated that residents are to be transferred safely to prevent or minimize risks for injury. The policy further indicated that the facility will ensure that there are appropriate amounts of varying sizes of slings to accommodate residents and that residents will be measured correctly as per manufacturer's instructions on proper sling sizing. Review of Resident R46's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/08/20, with diagnoses that included respiratory failure, heart failure, anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be nervous, uneasy,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-06 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, review of facility policy and resident council minutes, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to respond to resident concerns identified during resident council minutes for three of three months reviewed (November 2025, December 2025, and January 2026).Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled, Resident Council dated 1/28/26, indicated that a Resident Council Response Form will be utilized to track issues and their resolution and the facility department related to any issues will be responsible for addressing the item(s) of concern. During an interview on 2/04/26, at 10:45 a.m. Resident Council Members (Residents R5, R56, R58, R67, R79, and R86) confirmed they do not receive responses to previous Resident Council concerns and do not believe Resident Council concerns are resolved in a timely manner due to the number of ongoing concerns voiced by the group. Review of November 2025, Resident Council Meeting Minutes revealed: new…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-06 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility documents, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents access to petty cash on an ongoing basis, and to ensure have access to their funds from the resident's petty cash fund the same day for amounts less than $100.00 ($50.00 for Medicaid residents) and on weekends for all 89 of 89 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility Admissions Agreement Section 18 (iv) page 22 revealed the facility shall provide cash, if requested within one day of the request or a check, if requested within three days of the request. During interviews on 2/04/26, at 10:45 a.m. Residents R5, R56, R58, R67, R79 and R86 confirmed that they cannot access petty cash on the same day during the week and not at all on weekends. Residents stated that they must give at least 24-hour notice of cash requests to allow the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) time to go to the bank. During an interview on 2/04/26, 1:15 p.m. the NHA confirmed the cash box contains $400 and is kept in the Business Office.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility policies and documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a clean environment for multiple resident rooms on the first floor (101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 108, 109, 111, and 113) and multiple resident rooms on the third floor (303, 304, 305, 309, 316 and 317).Findings include:Review of facility policy entitled Homelike Environment dated 1/28/26, indicated residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment.Review of the facility admission Agreement page 10 revealed that the facility will provide clean lodging.A facility document entitled, Room Cleaning Process revealed that daily housekeeper tasks included remove trash, sweep/mop floor, clean bathroom surfaces then toilet, and sweep/mop bathroom.Observations on 2/03/26, between 10:50 a.m. and 1:15 p.m. and on 2/04/26, between 8:45 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. revealed resident Rooms 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 108, 109, 111, and 113 to have a removable build-up of a black substance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-06 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy (explanation of how long a bed can be held during a leave of absence and the cost per day), and failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider upon transfer to the hospital, for four of four residents reviewed (Residents R11, R12, R76, and R90).Review of facility policy entitled Transfer and Discharge dated 1-28-26, indicated Provide a notice of transfer and the facility's bed hold policy to the resident and representative as indicated. And For a transfer to another provider, for any reason, the following information must be provided to the receiving provider:Contact information of the practitioner who was responsible for the care of the residentResident representative information, including contact informationAdvance directive informationAll other information necessary to meet the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper care of respiratory equipment and failed to provide oxygen according to physician's orders for seven residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents R12, R19, R22, R25, R56, R50, and R29). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Oxygen Administration dated 1/28/26, indicated Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician., and Keep delivery devices covered in plastic bag when not in use. Review of Resident R12's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/9/24, with diagnoses that include chronic respiratory failure (a condition where your lungs don't exchange air properly), diabetes (a health condition that is caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), and congestive heart failure (the inability of the heart to maintain an adequate supply of blood to organs and tissues). Review of Resident R12's physician orders revealed an order for Oxygen at two liters/minute via nasal cannula (a thin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-06 · tag F0711 — pattern
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician signed and dated all orders during visits for nine of 21 residents reviewed (Residents R4, R7, R10, R18, R19, R22, R23, R58, and R67). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Physician Visits and Physician Delegation dated 1/28/26, revealed The physician should: See resident within 30 days of initial admission to the facility. The resident must be seen at least once every 30 calendar days for the first 90 calendar days after admission and at least every 60 days thereafter by physician or physician delegate as appropriate by state law. Sign and date all orders. Review of resident R4's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/26/18, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disorder that affects memory, thinking skills, and ability to perform simple tasks), diabetes (a chronic disease where the body does not produce enough insulin or cannot use it efficiently), and muscle weakness. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide resident privacy on one of five medication carts (Third floor 100 hall medication cart).Review of facility policy entitled Confidentiality of Information and Personal Privacy dated 1/28/26, revealed Ensure computer screens are in privacy mode or hidden when administering medications. Observations on 2/3/26, between 12:30 p.m. and 12:50 p.m. of the Third floor 100 hall medication cart revealed the medication cart sitting in the hallway against the wall with an open computer on top of the medication cart and resident health information visibly facing into the hallway. Continued observations revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E2 returned and walked away from the medication cart several times leaving resident health information visible while several visitors, residents and staff walked past the viewable health record. During an interview on 2/3/26, at 12:50 p.m. LPN Employee E2 confirmed that he/she left the medication cart with the computer open and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence that non-pharmacological interventions (interventions attempted to calm a resident other than medication) were attempted prior to the administration of an as needed (PRN) psychotropic (mind altering) medication for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R4). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Psychotropic Medication Use dated 1/28/26, revealed that non-pharmacological approaches are used to minimize the need for medications, permit lowest possible dose, and allow for discontinuation of medications when possible. Review of Resident R4's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/26/18, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disorder that affects memory, thinking skills, and ability to perform simple tasks), diabetes (a chronic disease where the body does not produce enough insulin or cannot use it efficiently), and muscle weakness. The clinical record revealed that on 12/2/25, Resident R4's physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0712 — isolated
  Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident's initial visit was conducted by the physician and that the physician alternate required resident visits with the nurse practitioner or physician's assistant for two of 21 residents reviewed (Residents R22 and R29).Findings include: Facility policy entitled, Physician Visits and Physician Delegation dated, 1/28/26, revealed that the physician should: see the resident within 30 days of initial admission to the facility; date, write, and sign a progress note for each visit; at the option of the physician, required visits in skilled nursing facilities, after the initial visit, may alternate between personal visits by the physician and visit by a physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist. Resident R29's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/13/26, with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes (condition when the body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood), heart failure, difficulty…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately discard outdated medications for two of three medication carts reviewed (First floor rehab and Second floor medication carts) and failed to prevent the opportunity for potential unauthorized access of medications on one of five medication carts observed (Third floor 100 hall medication cart).Review of facility policy entitled Administering Medications date 1/28/26, revealed When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container. and During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse. and The cart must be clearly visible to the personnel administering medications, and all outward sides must be inaccessible to residents or others passing by. Review of facility policy entitled Labeling of Medications and Biologicals dated 1/28/26, revealed Labels for multi-dose vials must include: The date the vial was initially opened or accessed. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,015 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,015 — penalty dated 2025-02-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ABRAHAM SMILOW — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $259K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA