No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Patriot Village

495 West Patriot Street, Somerset, PA 15501 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (814) 445-4549 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0607) — most recent Nov 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$132,561 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Nov 2023
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $132,561 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-20)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
121 S Center Ave · (814) 445-4495 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
168 W Main St · (814) 445-6511 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
127 W Main St · (814) 701-2221 · Call to confirm hours
Park
202 W Union St · (814) 445-4534 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.3%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.0%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.5%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.4%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.0%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.9%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.6%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.4%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.4%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.7%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.3%9.5%12.0%better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 88 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.7%CMS range 48.0–64.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 7.3–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge35.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.3–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.731.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
1.05
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.95
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
31.0%
Total nursing turnover
30.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 85.1 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-08)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-11-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2), resulting in Immediate Jeopardy to the resident's physical/mental health and safety. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated March 22, 2023, revealed that the facility shall provide a safe environment where residents are not subject to mental, physical, sexual, and verbal abuse or neglect by staff, residents, volunteers, consultants, contractors, and other caregivers, visitors or family members. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated August 29, 2023, revealed that the resident was sometimes understood, could sometimes understand, required extensive assistance with her daily care tasks including with eating, was totally dependent on staff for her transfers, and had diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-11-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a Nurse Aide Registry verification for one of five nurse aides reviewed upon hire (Nurse Aide 2) and staff failed to report physical abuse of one resident (Resident 1) in a timely manner which allowed a second resident to be physically abused (Resident 2) putting all of the residents in danger of being abused, resulting in Immediate Jeopardy to their physical safety. Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated March 22, 2023, revealed that the facility shall provide a safe environment where residents are not subject to mental, physical, sexual, and verbal abuse or neglect by staff, residents, volunteers, consultants, contractors, and other caregivers, visitors, or family members. All allegations of abuse should be reported immediately to the charge nurse, Director of Nursing, Nursing Home Administrator, and the resident's physician for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, clinical records, and facility reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that supervision and adequate interventions were in place to prevent a resident from receiving food items from other residents outside of their ordered diet restrictions for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 2), and failed to ensure that supervision and adequate interventions were in place to prevent a resident from giving other residents food items outside of their ordered diet restrictions for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 1). The facility's failure created a situation in which Resident 2 obtained a food item outside of his ordered diet restriction causing him to accidentally choke to death. The facility's failure also placed the current residents with diet restrictions in Immediate Jeopardy of the likelihood of serious bodily injury, harm, or death. The facility also failed to ensure that supervision and adequate interventions were in place to prevent a resident from assisting other residents in their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that physician's orders were followed for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 23). Findings include: A comprehensive significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 23, dated December 13, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance with daily care needs, received hypoglycemic medications including insulin and had a diagnosis of diabetes. Physician's orders for Resident 23, dated December 18, 2025, included orders for the resident to receive accu checks (a test used to monitor blood sugar) twice daily due to the patient receiving lantus insulin (a long-acting insulin used to lower blood sugar levels), with instructions to document if the patient refused. A review of Resident 23's December 2025 Medication Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a long-term intravenous catheter and a midline catheter (a type of peripheral catheter inserted into a large vein in the upper arm used to deliver fluids and/or medications) were flushed prior to and/or after medication administration for two of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 10).Findings include: The facility's policy regarding peripheral and midline IV catheter flushing dated December 31, 2025, included flushing before and after medication or fluid administration by attaching a prefilled saline syringe to the needleless access device to ensure the entire dose of the medication is administered.A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated November 18, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, had an amputation, received intravenous antibiotics, and had intravenous access.Physician's orders for Resident 4, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure communication between a dialysis provider and the facility's nursing staff for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 6). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding dialysis (mechanical cleansing of the blood to remove waste products when the kidneys are not functioning properly), dated December 31, 2025, indicated that The facility would assure that each resident received care and services for the provision of hemodialysis consistent with professional standards of practice. This would include ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services. The licensed nurse would communicate to the dialysis facility via telephonic communication or written format, such as a dialysis communication form or other form, that would include, but not limit itself to: timely medication administration (initiated, held or discontinued) by the nursing home and/or dialysis facility; physician/treatment orders,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored under sanitary conditions. Findings include: The facility's policy for food storage, dated December 31, 2025, indicated that frozen and refrigerated food items will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the FDA food code. The Dining Services Director/cook(s) ensures that all food items are stored properly in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. Observations in the main kitchen walk in refrigerator on January 5, 2026, at 9:19 a.m. revealed that there was a bag of hamburger patties that were opened and exposed to air and not dated, and observations of an opened cottage cheese container that was dated with a use-by date of January 3, 2026. Interview with the Dietary Manager at the time of the observation confirmed that the hamburger patties should have been dated when opened, sealed and not exposed to air and the cottage cheese should have been discarded. 28 Pa. Code 211.6(f) Dietary services.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive significant change Minimum Data Set assessment was completed in the required time frame for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 1), and failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set assessments for one of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 91). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2025, indicated that the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) was to be no later than the 14th calendar day after determination that a significant change in the resident's status occurred (determination date + 14 calendar days) and the significant change comprehensive MDS assessment was to be completed no later than the 14th calendar day after determination that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for three of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 34, 86). Findings include:The Long-Term Care Facility RAI User's Manual, dated October 2025, revealed that Section O0110J1b was to be checked if the resident was receiving dialysis treatment while a resident at the facility during the past 14 days.A care plan for Resident 6, dated May 23, 2024, revealed that the resident received dialysis on Monday and Friday, and prior to leaving, staff were to complete the dialysis communication form. Physician's orders, dated June 23, 2025, included orders for the resident to receive dialysis on Monday and Friday.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated December 12, 2025, revealed that the resident was understood and could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs of residents for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 40). Findings include: A facility policy for Care Plans, dated December 31, 2025, indicated that it is the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 40, dated October 14, 2025, revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, had clear speech, sometimes understood and sometimes understands requires moderate assistance from staff with daily care tasks, and had diagnoses that included vascular dementia, anxiety and psychotic mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in residents' care needs for two of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 5). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding care plan revision, dated December 31, 2025, indicated that nursing staff and/or the interdisciplinary team were to initiate and/or update care plans for the resident as warranted. In addition, individualized interventions for trauma survivors that recognizes the interrelation between trauma and symptoms of trauma, as indicated. Trigger-specific interventions will be used to identify ways to decrease the resident's exposure to triggers which re-traumatize the resident, as well as identify ways to mitigate or decrease the effect of the trigger on the resident.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 2, dated December 3, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received assistance devices to prevent accidents for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding assistive devices and equipment dated December 31, 2025, revealed that the facility maintains and supervises the use of assistive devices and equipment for residents and that if a resident is to be pushed or transported by anyone (staff, family, volunteers) in a wheelchair, bilateral leg rests must be attached to the wheelchair. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated December 3, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, dependent on staff for daily care needs and a wheelchair was used as a mobility device. Observation on January 5, 2026, at 11:48 a.m. revealed that the resident was transported in her wheelchair by Nurse Aide 1 down the hallway to the dining room without the use of leg rests.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to respond to a pharmacy recommendation for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 3).Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated November 17, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was independent for most care needs, and had a diagnosis of osteoporosis. Physician's orders for Resident 3, dated November 16, 2025, included orders for the resident to receive 70 milligrams (mg) of Alendronate Sodium (Fosamax) daily every Sunday for osteoporosis. A pharmacy medication regimen note for Resident 3, dated November 11, 2025, indicated that the resident is receiving Fosamax which comes with very specific administration instructions. The pharmacist's recommendations indicated to update the current order to include instructions to administer the medication on an empty stomach before a.m. meals and medications, with water only (at least 8 ounces), and for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include:.The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending January 9, 2025, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending January 8, 2026, identified repeated deficiencies related to accuracy of MDS ( Minimum Data Sets) assessments, revision of residents' care plans, quality of care, and food stored, prepared and served in a sanitary manner.The facility's plan of corrections for deficiencies regarding accuracy of MDS assessments cited during the survey ending…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for five of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 46, 54, 65, 73, 77). Findings include: A facility policy regarding plans of care, dated August 28, 2024, indicated that resident assessments are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and their condition changes. The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; when the desired outcome is not met; when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs). An annual MDS assessment for Resident 46, dated October 17, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was understood and able to understand others, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to follow physician's orders for three of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 27, 50, 77), and failed to ensure that bowel protocols were followed as ordered by the physician for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 69). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 27, dated December 2, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood and could understand others, and had a diagnosis which included hypertension (high blood pressure). A care plan for the resident, dated August 8, 2024, revealed that the resident had an altered cardiovascular (relating to the heart and blood vessels) status related to hypertension and that staff were to administer the resident's medications per orders. Physician's orders for Resident 27, dated April 22, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, and a meal test tray, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items that were palatable to the residents. Findings include: Interview with Resident 73 on January 7, 2025, at 10:47 a.m. revealed that when she receives her meal tray, the food is not as warm as she likes it to be, and the taste of the food has a lot to be desired. Interview with Resident 74 on January 7, 2025, at 10:33 a.m. revealed that the food is cold. Interview with Resident 77 on January 7, 2025, at 11:12 a.m. revealed that the food is terrible and she only drinks milk. Interview with a group of residents on January 8, 2025, at 10:07 a.m. revealed that food is an ongoing issue. The food is cold, food is dry, and they always have pork and chicken. Interview with Resident 45 on January 8, 2025, at 12:07 p.m., while she was eating sweet and sour pork for lunch, revealed that she could not taste the sweet and sour. Observations in the kitchen of the tray line for the East Side Third floor cart on January 8, 2025, at 11:38 a.m. and First cart for East Side Third…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food preparation, dated August 28, 2024, revealed that the dinning services director/cook is responsible to ensure that proper practice is utilized in thawing frozen foods. One method is that frozen foods are completely submerged under cold water (70 degrees or below) that is running fast enough to agitate and float off loose ice particles. Observations in the kitchen on January 7, 2025, at 8:49 a.m. revealed a large bag of chicken in a sealed plastic bag in the kitchen sink submerged in water. No running water was observed. Observations in the kitchen on January 7, 2025, at 9:06 a.m. revealed a large bag of chicken in a sealed plastic bag in the kitchen sink submerged in water. No running water was observed. Interview with the Food Service Director at that time indicated that they usually put the frozen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain dignity for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 34) who had an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 34, dated December 19, 2024, indicated that the resident was understood and able to understand others, and had an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube used to drain urine from the bladder into a drainage collection bag). A care plan for the resident, dated April 29, 2024, revealed that the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. Staff were to cover the urinary drainage bag with a dignity cover and position the catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from entrance room door. Physician's orders for Resident 34, dated August 22, 2024, included an order for the resident to have an indwelling urinary catheter for a diagnosis of obstructive uropathy (a condition that occurs when urine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident representative had an opportunity to develop an advance directive (instructions regarding the provision of health care when the resident is incapacitated) or assist in formulating an advance directive for two of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 10, 46). Findings include: The facility policy regarding advance directives, dated August 28, 2024, indicated that prior to or upon admission of the resident, the social services director or designee inquires of the resident, his/her family members, and/or his or her legal representative about the existence of any written advance directive. The resident or representative is provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so. If the resident or resident representative indicates that he or she has not established advance directives, the facility staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for three of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 19, 69, 84). Findings include: Observations of Resident 19 on January 8, 2025, at 8:50 a.m. revealed that the resident was sitting in her room in a facility recliner that had the leather covering on the arms, seat and back of the chair heavily shredded and torn. In order to provide comfort, the resident had her own blanket covering the back of the chair. When asked if she minded the torn upholstery, the resident indicated that she would rather it had a brown slipcover like her roommate's recliner. Observations of Resident 69 on January 7, 2025, at 10:22 a.m. and January 8, 2025, at 8:57 a.m. revealed that the resident was sitting in his room in a facility recliner that had the leather covering on the arms, seat and back that was very heavily shredded and torn. Observations of Resident 84's facility recliner on January 8, 2025, at 8:53 revealed that the arms and back of the leather-type covering was shredded and torn.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a written notice regarding emergency transfer to the hospital was provided to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and failed to ensure that a written notice was provided to the resident and the resident's responsible party regarding the reason for transfer to the hospital for two of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 61, 73). Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 61, dated December 6, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, was understood, and could understand others. A nursing note, dated November 29, 2024, at 1:18 p.m., revealed that Resident 61 was diaphoretic (sweating), slurring words, and hypoxic. The resident began to vomit brown liquid and was then sent to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment. There was no documented evidence that a written notice of Resident 61's transfer to the hospital was provided to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for two of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 61, 74). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides guidance and instructions for the completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October, 2024, indicated that the intent of Section N was to record the number of days, during the seven day assessment period, that any type of injection, insulin, and/or select medications were received by the resident. Section N0300 was to indicate if the resident received any type of injection during the last seven days and Section N0415B Antianxiety Medications was to be coded if the resident took the medication during the seven-day look-back period. Physician's orders for Resident 61, dated December 3, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Pennsylvania Nurse Practice Act and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were clarified when needed for two of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 29, 73). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicated that the registered nurse was to collect complete and ongoing data to determine nursing care needs, analyze the health status of individuals and compare the data with the norm when determining nursing care needs, and carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain and restore the well-being of individuals. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 29, dated December 2, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, had diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease (ESRD - a permanent condition that occurs when the kidneys are no longer able to function properly), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that treatments and preventative measures for pressure ulcers were provided as ordered by the physician for two of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 19, 50). Findings include: An admission MDS assessment for Resident 19, dated December 6, 2024, revealed that the resident had mild cognitive impairment, was understood and able to understand others, had impaired mobility with deconditioning, had one pressure area, two unstageable and three Stage 3 pressure ulcers (pressure wound with skin loss) upon admission, and received pressure ulcer care. A care plan for Resident 19, dated December 8, 2024, revealed that staff was to administer treatments as ordered. Physician's orders for Resident 19, dated December 8, 2024, included an order to apply skin prep (protectant) to the purple area on the left lateral heel and cover with comfort foam (an absorbent dressing). Physician's orders, dated December 10, 2024, included an order to cleanse the right buttocks with wound cleaner,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that restorative nursing programs to maintain or improve physical abilities were provided as ordered and/or care planned for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 10). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 10, dated December 19, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, was usually understood and usually able to understand others, had functional limitation in range of motion (ROM - extend or limit to which a joint can be moved) to his bilateral upper and lower extremities, was dependent with care needs, and had diagnoses that included muscle contractures (a permanent shortening and tightening of muscle fibers that reduces flexibility and makes movement difficult) of multiple sites, contracture to right hand, and a personal history of traumatic brain injury. A care plan for Resident 10 addressing his decreased ROM and contractures,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received proper care for indwelling urinary catheters for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 34). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 34, dated December 19, 2024, indicated that the resident was understood and able to understand others, and had an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible catheter used to drain urine from the bladder into a drainage collection bag). A care plan for the resident, dated April 29, 2024, revealed that the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter and staff was to position the indwelling urinary catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder. Observations of Resident 34 on January 7, 2025, at 10:41 a.m. and 11:33 a.m. revealed that the resident was lying in bed with his indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag and tubing lying on the floor. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 1 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received oxygen as ordered by the physician for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 29). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding oxygen therapy, dated August 28, 2024, indicated that oxygen was to be administered in accordance with physician's orders. A admission Minimum data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 29, dated December 2, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and had diagnoses that included congestive obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems) and heart failure (a condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should). Resident 29's care plan, dated January 6, 2025, indicated that she had difficulty breathing related to chronic respiratory failure. Physician's orders for Resident 29, dated January 1, 2025, included an order for the resident to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 50). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding documentation of medication administration, dated August 28, 2024, indicated that the nurse was to document all medications administered to each resident on the resident's medication administration record (MAR). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 50, dated December 9, 2024, revealed that the resident had mild cognitive impairment, was understood and able to understand others, had pain, and was administered routine and as needed pain medications. Physician's orders for Resident 50, dated December 3, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 5 milligrams (mg) of Oxycodone HCL (a narcotic drug used to treat moderate to severe pain) every four hours as needed for moderate to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of manufacturer's instructions and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication administration error rate of less than five percent. Findings include: Observations during medication administration on January 8, 2025, at 8:19 a.m. and at 11:51 a.m. revealed that two medication administration errors were made during 36 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication administration error rate of 6.25 percent. Physician's orders for Resident 27, dated April 22, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive one 10 milligram (mg) tablet of Hydralazine (used to treat high blood pressure) three times a day. Staff was to hold the medication if the resident's systolic blood pressure (the top number of a blood pressure) was less than 100 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or if the resident's heart rate was less than 60 beats per minute. Observations during the medication administration on January 8, 2025, at 8:19 a.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 7 prepared and administered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly date medications after they were opened in one of three medication carts reviewed (First floor cart), failed to discard expired medical supplies, and failed to sign out routine narcotics on the appropriate narcotic medication card (Residents 37, 69). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication storage and disposal, dated [DATE], revealed that the facility would properly date medication vials after they were opened and remove outdated supplies from the facility inventory. Observations in the First floor medication cart on [DATE], at 11:01 a.m. revealed that there was one 10 ml (milliliter) bottle of Systane (medication used to relieve dry, irritated eyes) eye drops opened and undated. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 6 on [DATE], at 11:10 p.m. confirmed that the Systane eye drops were open and should have been labeled with the date it was opened.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adaptive eating equipment as ordered by the physician for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 69). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 69, dated November 20, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and required set-up assistance from staff with eating. Physician's orders for Resident 69, dated November 4, 2024, included an order for built-up utensils for all meals. A care plan, dated June 20, 2024, indicated that the resident was to utilize built-up utensils. Observations of Resident 69 during the breakfast meal on October 9, 2024, at 8:26 a.m. revealed that the resident was in his room eating his meal with regular utensils and did not have built-up utensils. The resident's meal ticket included built-up utensils. Interview with Nurse Aide 9 at that time confirmed that Resident 69 did not have built-up utensils and should have had them.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending February 29, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility-maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending January 9, 2025, identified repeated deficiencies related the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs), to care plan timing and revision, the failure to provide quality of care, issues with the accountability of controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 50). Findings include: CDC guidance on isolation precautions and Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO's - bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics, and these antibiotics can no longer be used to control or kill the bacteria), dated July 12, 2022, indicates that MDRO transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the physician, resulting in significant medication errors for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 7). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated January 1, 2024, indicated that residents were to receive all medications as per the physician's order meeting the requirements of the right dose, right route, at the right rate, at the right time, and for the right resident. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 7, dated December 19, 2023, indicated that the resident was alert and oriented, received insulin, and had diagnoses that included diabetes. Physician's orders for Resident 7, dated December 14, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 5 units of Insulin Lispro (fast acting insulin) subcutaneously (beneath the skin) twice a day for diabetes and to hold the insulin if the resident's blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of manufacturer's instructions and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store unopened (unused) multi-dose containers of insulin according to manufacturer's instructions for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 22), and failed to ensure that controlled refrigerated medications were stored in a separately-locked, permanently-affixed container in one of two medication refrigerators reviewed (third-floor east medication room refrigerator). Findings include: Manufacturer's directions for Insulin Lispro (Humalog - a fast-acting insulin used to lower blood sugar levels), dated July 2023, indicated to store unused pens in the refrigerator at 36 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 46 degrees F. Unused pens may be used until the expiration date printed on the label if the pen has been kept in the refrigerator. Physician's orders for Resident 22, dated January 30, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive Insulin Lispro as per a sliding scale (the amount of Insulin given was determined by the blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to store food under sanitary conditions, failing to ensure that dietary staff wore appropriate hair coverings, and failing to ensure that a microwave was clean and free of deterioration, for one of three microwaves reviewed (first-floor pantry) Findings include: The facility's policy regarding uniform dress code, dated January 31, 2024, revealed to restrain all facial hair with a beard net/restraint. Observations in the outside walk-in freezer on February 26, 2024, at 8:53 a.m. and February 27, 2024, at 1:15 p.m. revealed that there was an accumulation of ice on the ceiling and floor, as well as on a plastic jug that contained water, a case of ham, and a case of roast beef that were stored on the shelves below the freezer condenser. Interview with the Dietary Manager on February 27, 2024, at 1:15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments for two of 45 residents reviewed (Residents 30, 72). Findings include: The RAI User's Manual, dated October, 2023, indicated that Sections P0100A-P0100H were to capture physical restraint use, Section E0100A-H was to be coded (0) when restraints are not used, (1) when a restraint was used less than daily, and (2) when a restraint was used daily. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) (for Resident 30, dated November 24, 2023, revealed that section P0100F (limb restraint) was coded (1) used less than daily. Observations of Resident 30 in the dining room on February 26, 2024, at 12:29 p.m. revealed the resident was sitting in her broda chair with no restraints. Interview with Licenced Practical Nurse 1 on February 28, 2024, at 1:55 p.m. revealed that Resident 30 does not have a limb…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that baseline care plans included the information and instructions needed to provide person-centered care for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 80). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding baseline care plans, dated January 31, 2024, indicated that within 24-48 hours of admission the facility was to coordinate the gathering, assessment, and evaluation of information from all sources (hospital, facility assessments and notes, resident/resident representative interview) and initiate the resident's care plan. No later than 48 hours after admission the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator (RNAC- a registered nurse who is often involved in the development of residents' care plans) or designated person would ensure that the baseline care plan was in place and all required items were addressed. admission information for Resident 80 revealed that he was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' care plans were reviewed and revised to reflect their current care needs for two of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 35, 42). Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 35, dated December 18, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance for daily care tasks. The resident's care plan, dated November 14, 2023, revealed that the resident was medicated with an anticoagulant (blood thinner); however, the resident's anticoagulant was discontinued on December 13, 2023. There was no documented evidence that Resident 35's care plan was updated to reflect the discontinuation of the anticoagulant. Interview with the Director of Nursing on February 28, 2024, at 3:42 p.m. confirmed that Resident 35's care plan should have been updated to reflect the discontinuation of the anticoagulant and it was not. A significant change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete treatments as ordered by the physician for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 78). Findings include: An admission skin assessment, dated February 24, 2024, revealed that Resident 78 had scabs on his second, fourth, and fifth toes of the left foot. Physician's orders, dated February 25, 2024, included an order to apply skin prep (protective film) to the second, fourth, and fifth toe of the left foot every day shift. A comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated June 26, 2021, revealed that the resident was able to make himself understood and could understand others, required supervision with daily care activities, had a surgical wound that required treatments, and had diagnoses that included a wound infection. Physician's orders, dated June 20, 2021, included an order to clean the resident's abdominal wounds with normal saline solution (medical grade salt water) and pack…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 42). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding controlled substances, dated January 31, 2024, indicated that accurate accountability of the inventory of all controlled drugs is maintained at all times. When a controlled substance was administered, the licensed nurse administering the medication was to immediately enter the following information on the accountability record and Medication Administration Record (MAR): date and time of administration, amount administered, remaining quantity, and the initials of the nurse administering the dose, completed after the medication is actually administered. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 42, dated December 15, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that non-pharmacological (non-medication) interventions were attempted prior to the administration of anti-anxiety medications for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 53). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 53, dated January 30, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired and had diagnoses that included anxiety. Physician's orders for Resident 53, dated January 28, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 0.5 milligrams (mg) of Ativan (an antianxiety medication) every six hours as needed for anxiety. Resident 53's care plan, dated January 28, 2024, revealed that the resident used an antianxiety medication related to anxiety. Resident 53's Medication Administration Records (MAR's) for February 2024 revealed that staff administered as needed Ativan to the resident on February 1 at 12:41 a.m. and 9:30 p.m., February 2 at 5:21 a.m., February 5 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for two of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 42). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 7, dated December 19, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, had pressure ulcers (skin impairment caused by pressure), and received pressure ulcer care. Physician's orders, dated December 18, 2023, included an order for collagen (promotes wound healing, silver alginate (prevents infection) and a bordered foam covering be applied to the left heel every day shift. A wound note, dated February 20, 2024, revealed the resident had a Stage 3 pressure ulcer (a full thickness tissue loss where subcutaneous fat may be visible) on the left heel that measured 1.3 x 0.6 x 0.3 centimeters (cm). Resident 7's Treatment Administration Records (TAR's) for February 2024 revealed that there was no documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of correction for the State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending March 2, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of corrections that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility-maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending February 29, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to a failure to complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of residents' abilities and care needs) accurately, revision of care plans, following physician's orders, to prepare and store food under sanitary conditions, and to maintain complete and accurate clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to honor a power of attorney's right to make informed choices and participate in treatment decisions for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding resident rights, dated March 22, 2023, revealed that residents and/or their representatives have the right to be fully informed of their medical condition in a language they can understand, and to participate in person-centered care planning and treatment, including the type of caregiver who provides services. The residents also have the right to refuse and/or discontinue medications and treatments and to formulate an advanced directive. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated August 29, 2023, revealed that the resident was sometimes understood, sometimes understands, required extensive assistance with her daily care tasks including with eating, was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included specific and individualized interventions for two of six residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care planning, dated March 23, 2023, indicated that the interdisciplinary team is responsible to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that have been identified in the comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive care plan will meet professional standards of quality and services and will be provided by qualified persons. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 1, dated August 28, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, was independent with transfers and ambulation, had no behaviors, and had diagnoses that included dementia, anxiety and depression. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of job descriptions and the deficiencies cited during the current survey, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to assume responsibility for effective management of the facility to ensure that the residents' environment remained free of accident hazards, and for ensuring that each resident receives and is provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs. Findings include: The job description for the NHA, dated March 8, 2023, indicated that the primary function of this position was to establish and direct the overall operation of the facility's operations in compliance with all federal, state, and local guidelines, standards and regulations as directed by the Senior [NAME] President and/or President so as to ensure that each resident receives the highest standard of care and services and to ensure the facility is operated in a prudent and fiscally responsible fashion. That the administrator has total responsibility for the nursing home's operation on a 24-hour/seven day per week basis,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$132,561 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $132,561 — penalty dated 2023-10-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ABRAHAM SMILOW — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a private-equity firm. That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • LADS AVENUE ASSOCIATES LLC — private equity · 1.50% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PATRIOT OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2024
PATRIOT PROPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2024
T3 REAL ESTATE INITIATIVES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2024
SMILOW, ABRAHAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2024
FOCKLER, CRAIGIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2025
HAGERICH, BRYANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
HILLEL TROPPER 2016 IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
MOSHE TROOPER 2016 IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2021
T3 INITIATIVES LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/01/2024
LADS AVENUE ASSOCIATES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
PATRIOT CONSULTING COMPANY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/05/2024
PATRIOT PROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
TRAVITSKY, BARUCHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 4%Other / private 26%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$371per resident / day
operating cost
$11,274per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$338per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395840. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next