No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Casselman Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

201 Hospital Drive, Meyersdale, PA 15552 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (814) 634-5966 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (814) 634-5966 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 20251 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2025
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
202 Beachley St · (814) 634-5935 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
327 Main St · (814) 634-8614 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion1.1 mi
7280 Mason Dixon Hwy · (814) 634-0238 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Grant St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.4%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms32.1%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened27.0%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.6%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.8%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.0%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.8%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.4%17.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine48.1%68.7%79.4%worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.2%CMS range 28.1–58.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 7.3–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.761.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.78
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.41
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.50
RN hoursweekends
51.0%
Total nursing turnover
63.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 47.7 residents a day — about 48% occupied, or roughly 51 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-31)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that podiatry appointments were carried out, failed to follow podiatry recommendations, failed to provide weekly surgical wound assessments, and failed to provide treatments for an ingrown toenail resulting in an infection and pain for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: An interview with the Resident 2 on September 27, 2023, revealed that she had concerns about cancelled podiatry appointments. One appointment was cancelled because she was late, but the other appointment was cancelled for an unknown reason, and she was not informed the reason. Resident 2 explained that she has been on treatments for an ingrown toenail for months now. She has been on multiple antibiotic medications, and it continues to be painful, red, and infected. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated August 30, 2023, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and staff environment was maintained in a safe and sanitary environment in one of two medication rooms (third floor). Findings include: Observations of the third-floor medication room on June 29, 2026, at 9:47 a.m. revealed that upon entering the medication room there was a strong musty odor. The ceiling had an area approximately two feet in diameter that was discolored, water damaged and had loose plaster and tape. There was a basin on the floor that contained water. The medication room contained the Pyxis machine (medication dispensing machine) and over the counter medications stored in cabinets. An e-mail communication, dated May 26, 2026, revealed that there were several roof leaks that were coming in on the third floor. The roof was in bad shape with shingles missing, waterways cracked and open, missing caps, nails popped up, and rotted plywood. A quote was received regarding the cost of the materials required to repair the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to change an indwelling urinary catheter as ordered by the physician and to change an indwelling urinary catheter as recommended by the urologist for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2).Findings include:The facility policy for urinary catheter care, dated January 8, 2026, indicated that changing indwelling catheters or drainage bags at routine, fixed intervals, was not recommended. Rather it was suggested to change catheters and drainage bags based on clinical indications such as infection, obstruction, or when the closed system was compromised.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated March 11, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, had an indwelling urinary catheter, and had diagnoses that included neurogenic bladder (a lack of bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord, or nerve condition).Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated October…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 6 residents reviewed (Resident 2).Findings include: A facility policy related to controlled substances, dated April 7, 2025, indicated that waste and/or disposal of controlled medications are done in the presence of the nurse and a witness who also signs the disposition sheet. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated January 15, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent for care needs, had signs indicating delirium, received controlled medications including antianxiety medications (used to treat anxiety), and had diagnoses that included dementia, anxiety, depression and psychotic disorder. Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated January 14, 2026, included orders for the resident to receive a 0.5 milligram (mg) tablet of Ativan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at safe and appetizing temperatures.Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food safety requirements, dated April 7, 2025 indicated that foods and beverages shall be distributed and served in a manner that is palatable, and the temperatures will be at the recommended temperatures per the Federal Food Code temperature Requirements which states that hot food must be held at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or higher.Observations in the kitchen for the lunch meal service on September 17, 2025, at 11:31 a.m. revealed that a test tray left the kitchen and arrived on the west wing at 12:01 p.m. The lunch meal on September 17, 2025, consisted of baked fish, rice, and mixed vegetables. Trays were passed to the residents in their rooms, and the last resident was served and eating at 12:06 p.m. The test tray on September 17, 2025, at 12:06 p.m. revealed that the temperature of the baked fish was 122.8 degrees Fahrenheit, rice was 143.3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to revise/update care plans after an incident for one of 5 residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated April 7, 2025, indicated that the care plan will be reviewed and revised to reflect changes in the resident's status. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated August 21, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, could understand and was understood, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs and had diagnoses that included, morbid obesity, anxiety and chronic migraines. A care plan, revised July 14, 2025, indicated that Resident 1 had the potential to be verbally aggressive related to ineffective coping skills. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated August 3, 2025, indicated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act and information submitted from the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a licensed practical nurse's license remained current for one of one licensed practical nurse's reviewed (Licensed Practical Nurse 2). This was cited as past non-compliance.Findings include:The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, for the expiration and renewal of licensure revealed that notice of the renewal period of a license will be sent to each active licensee prior to the expiration date of the licensee's license. The applicant for license renewal may complete and submit an application online or may mail a completed application form to the Board's administrative office. When applying for licensure renewal, a registered nurse shall complete and submit the renewal application, including disclosing any license to practice nursing or any allied health profession in any other state, territory,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for three of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 38, 52). Findings include:The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, revealed that Section N0415F1 (antibiotic medication) was to be checked if the resident received an antibiotic medication during the seven-day assessment period and Section N0415K1 was to be checked if the resident received an anticonvulsant medication during the seven-day assessment period.Physician's orders for Resident 3 dated May 1, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 300 milligrams (mg) of Gabapentin two times a day for diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage that can cause pain, numbness, tingling, and weakness in the hands and feet, and sometimes other parts of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for two of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 4 and 9). A facility policy for Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change dated April 7, 2025, indicated that the comprehensive care plan will be reviewed, and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 4 dated May 2, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis (disease in which the immune system eats away at the protective covering of nerves). The Care plan for Resident 4 dated October 13, 2023, indicated that the resident was receiving diuretic therapy (water pills, to increase urine production and help the body eliminate excess fluid and sodium). Review of the Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to bowel protocols for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 42).Findings include:A facility policy for Bowel Movements Monitoring dated April 7, 2025, indicated that all residents' bowel movements will be documented. If a resident has not had a bowel movement for three full days, the licensed nurse will follow bowel protocol as ordered by the physician. All shifts will then monitor for effectiveness. If initial laxative is ineffective, then a second laxative if ordered is given as per order. Resident will be monitored on all shifts for bowel movements to see if second laxative was effective. If the second laxative was ineffective, then an enema will be given per physician order. All three shifts will monitor resident for bowel movement to see if enema was effective. If enema is ineffective, notify the physician.A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 42 dated July 3, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0729 — isolated
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility job descriptions and personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff renewed their nurse aide registry to allow individuals to work as a nurse aide for one of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 3). Findings include:The facility's job description, undated, revealed that a nurse aide certification was necessary to perform functions of the position. This was cited as past-noncompliance.The personnel file for agency Nurse Aide 3 revealed that her certification on the nurse aide registry expired on [DATE]. The facility was unaware that Nurse Aide 3's certification on the nurse aide registry had expired until they were notified on [DATE], by Nurse Aide 3. Nurse Aide 3 worked in the facility from [DATE] through [DATE] and was immediately removed from the schedule when it was discovered that her registry had expired. Interview with the Director of Human Resources on [DATE] at 11:06 a.m. confirmed that Nurse Aide 3's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly labeled for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 37). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding labeling of medications, dated April 7, 2025, indicated that all medications and biologicals used in the facility will be labeled in accordance with current state and federal regulations to facilitate consideration of precautions and safe administration of medications. Labels for individual drug containers must include appropriate instructions and precautions. The pharmacy must be informed of any changes or changes in directions for use of the medication. Physician's orders for Resident 37, dated July 1, 2025, indicated that the resident was to receive two 300 milligram (mg) capsules of Gabapentin (a medication used to treat nerve pain) daily and one 300 mg capsule of Gabapentin at bedtime. Observations during the medication administration on July 31, 2025, at 8:24 a.m. revealed that Licensed Practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory studies as ordered by the physician for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 3).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding laboratory services and reporting, dated April 7, 2025, revealed that the facility would provide or obtain laboratory services when ordered by a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist in accordance with state law. The facility would provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated June 25, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and had diagnoses that included hypothyroidism (when the thyroid gland doesn't make and release enough hormone into your bloodstream). A pharmacy review for Resident 3, dated May 3, 2025 revealed the resident was taking levothyroxine (medication used to treat hypothyroidism) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and facility investigative documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from misappropriation of medications for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 3).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding controlled narcotics dated April 7, 2025, indicated that the facility complies with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of controlled medications (listed as Schedule II-V of the comprehensive drug abuse prevention and control act of 1976). Misappropriation was defined as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent example drug diversion (taking the residents medication).A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated May 29, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate accounting of controlled medications (medications with the potential to be abused) for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated April 7, 2025, indicated that the individual administering the medication initials the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next ones.The facility's policy regarding controlled substance administration, dated April 7, 2025, states that an individual controlled substance record is made for each resident who will be receiving a controlled substance.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated May 14, 2025, revealed that the resident is cognitively intact, required assistance for daily care needs, and had medical diagnosis that include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that call bells were within reach for two of six residents reviewed (Residents 3, 5). Findings include: The facility's policy for call lights: accessibility and timely response, dated May 31, 2024, indicated that the purpose was to ensure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside, toilet, and bathing facility, to allow residents to call for assistance. Staff would ensure the call light was within reach of residents and secured, as needed. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 3, dated March 21, 2025, revealed that the resident could usually make herself understood and understand others, had moderate cognitive impairment, required assistance from staff for care needs, was occasionally incontinent of bladder, and had diagnoses that included seizures. A care plan for Resident 3, dated February 16, 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care for pressure ulcers in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that recommendations from a wound consultant were reviewed with the attending physician for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 2) who had pressure ulcers. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding the prevention of pressure ulcers, dated May 31, 2024, indicated that the facility would review the resident's care plan and identify the risk factors as well as the interventions designed to reduce or eliminate those considered modifiable. The resident was to be assessed on admission for existing pressure injury risk factors, repeated weekly, and upon any changes in condition. The facility was to select appropriate support surfaces and pressure redistribution based on the resident's risk factors, in accordance with current clinical practice. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment in the second floor ice room and in resident rooms for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Observations in the second floor ice room on January 29, 2025, at 9:09 a.m. revealed that there was an ice machine sitting on a wooden type bench/platform. The platform was greenish/blue in color with a moderate amount of chipped paint. The front and top of the platform was noted to have a blackish-brown, removable substance on it that measured approximately 10.0 x 15.0 inches. Interview with the Maintenance Director on January 29, 2025, at 12:17 p.m. confirmed that in the past the ice machine leaked and dripped water onto the top of the platform, which over time resulted in the blackish, removable substance. Observations in Residents 1's room on January 29, 2025, at 9:13 a.m. revealed that there were four holes in the dry wall to the left of the resident's television measuring approximately 5.0 x 4.0 inches each. Interview with Resident 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and manufacturer's instructions, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that battery packs were replaced in mechanical lifts. Findings include: Manufacturer's directions for the ArjoHuntleigh Lifter Battery Pack SPL3021, dated August 9, 2016, used for the facility mechanical lifts (equipment used to safely and easily move residents) revealed that the battery life is variable (2-5 years) and depends on proper charging practices. Batteries were to be recharged on a regular basis (at least monthly), they were not to reach a low charge state, and the battery packs were to be removed from the lift when not used for a long period of time. Interviews with Nurse Aide 1 and Nurse Aide 2 on January 29, 2025, at 10:10 a.m. indicated that even when the mechanical lift batteries are fully charged, they are losing their charge very quickly, which makes it difficult and frustrating to provide timely and safe care to the residents. Observations of the five battery chargers in the second floor dining and linen rooms on January 29, 2025, at 12:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and accurately documented for one one of six residents reviewed (Resident 5). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated October 4, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood; could understand others; had diagnoses that included anemia (low blood count), heart failure (a serious condition that occurs when the heart is unable to pump enough blood and oxygen to the body's organs), hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes, cerebral vascular accident (CVA - commonly known as a stroke), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD -a common lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe); and received oxygen therapy. A nursing note for Resident 5, dated November 2, 2024, at 2:00 a.m., and completed by Licensed Practical Nurse 1, revealed that at approximately 2:00 a.m. the writer went down to the second floor to change the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly secured in the medication cart. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication labeling and storage, dated May 31, 2024, indicated that compartments (including but not limited to drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing medications are locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items are not left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others. Observations on August 13, 2024, at 8:58 a.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 1 left a medication cart out of sight, unattended and unlocked in the hallway when she entered a resident's room. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 1 at the time of the observation confirmed that her medication cart was not locked when she entered a resident's room, and it should have been. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on August 13, 2024, at 9:17 a.m. confirmed that the medication cart should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-15 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the designated interdisciplinary team member obtained the required information from the contracted hospice provider for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 26) who were receiving hospice services. Findings include: The facility's Hospice Program policy, dated May 31, 2024, indicated that in general, it was the facility's responsibility to meet the resident's personal care and nursing needs in coordination with the hospice representative, and ensure that the level of care provided was appropiately based on the individual resident's need, which included communicating with the hospice provider (and documenting such communication) to ensure that the needs of the resident were addressed and met 24 hours per day. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 26, dated July 24, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, received hospice services, and had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and resident's representative in writing of the transfer and reason for hospitalization for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 54). Findings include: A nursing note for Resident 54, dated May 20, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility that afternoon. A nursing note for Resident 54, dated May 25, 2024, revealed that the writer received a call from the resident's son at 7:28 p.m. that the resident was not answering her cell phone. The resident's son stated that he felt that the resident has had a decline over the last few days. The writer relayed information to the resident's son that she received in report about the resident's increased weakness and orthostatic blood pressures (a condition where blood pressure drops suddenly when someone stands up from a sitting or lying position). The writer assured the resident's son that she would go back and assess the resident, update him, and make sure the resident's phone was charged and within…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physicians orders were followed for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 21). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 21, dated June 25, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood and able to understand others, was cognitively impaired, required substantial assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included heart failure and hypertension (high blood pressure). A care plan for for Resident 21, dated August 5, 2024, indicated that the resident had an actual fall due to poor balance and an unsteady gait. A nursing note for Resident 21, dated August 4, 2024, at 1:31 a.m., revealed that resident was found sitting on his buttocks on the floor in his room. The resident was incontinent of bowel at the time of the fall. A nursing note for Resident 21, dated August 4, 2024, at 9:40 p.m., revealed that he had a witnessed fall.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, as well observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of potential safety hazards related to the facility's hot water temperatures. Findings include: A facility policy for safe water temperatures, dated January 31, 2024, included that water heaters that service resident rooms, bathrooms, common areas, and tub/shower areas shall be set to temperatures of no more than 110 degrees Fahrenheit (F), or the maximum allowable temperature per state regulation. Observations of the Maintenance Director checking water temperatures in sinks on the second and third floors on June 21, 2024, between 9:52 a.m. and 10:09 a.m. revealed temperatures from 114 degrees F to 125 degrees F. Interview with the Maintenance Director on June 21, 2024, at 10:18 a.m. revealed that the water temperature in the sinks in the residents' rooms should be no higher than 110 degrees F, and that he could adjust the water temperatures as needed. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on June 21, 2024, at 11:42 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the accountability of controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for three of four residents reviewed (Residents 2, 3, 4). Findings include: A facility policy for medication administration, dated January 31, 2024, revealed that after the medication has been administered, the nurse will initial the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) on the appropriate line and will record the date and time. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated March 7, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with care needs, was receiving hospice services, and received opioid (controlled drug used to treat pain) medication. Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated February 28, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 50 milligrams (mg) of tramadol (controlled drug used to treat pain) every four hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for four of seven residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 4, 6). Findings include: A facility policy regarding plans of care, dated January 31, 2024, indicated that resident assessments are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and their condition changes. The facility's policy regarding behaviors, dated January 31, 2024, indicated that interventions and approaches would be based on a detailed assessment of physical, psychological and behavioral symptoms and their underlying causes, as well as the potential situational and environmental reasons for the behavior. The care plan would include, as a minimum, a description of behavioral symptoms, targeted and individualized interventions for the behavioral and/or psychosocial symptoms, the rationale for the interventions and approaches, specific and measurable goals for targeted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: The facility's policy for abuse, dated January 31, 2024, indicated that residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Abuse was defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Willful meant the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated January 23, 2024, indicated that the resident was usually understood and could usually understand others, was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, and had diagnoses that included anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications timely for a wound infection for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 1) and failed to follow treatment recommendations for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated December 17, 2023, indicated that the resident was usually understood and could usually understand others, was dependent on staff for personal hygiene needs, had a pressure ulcer (skin breakdown caused by prolonged, unrelieved pressure) and surgical wound, and had diagnoses that included osteomyelitis (infection in the bone) of the vertebra (spinal column), sacral (base of the spine) and sacrococcygeal (sacrum and tailbone) region. A skin and wound note for Resident 1, dated August 28, 2023, at 1:05 p.m. revealed that the resident was seen by the wound consultant who recommended an extended course of 100 milligrams (mg) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and written menus, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their planned menu. Findings include: The facility's policy for menus, dated July 31, 2023, revealed that menus are served as written unless changed in response to preference, unavailability of an item, or a special meal. The written menu for the week of October 29, 2023, revealed that there was to be beef ravioli, marinara sauce, Italian parmesan vegetable medley, garlic french bread, and pineapple upside down cake for lunch. A plain beef ravioli recipe, dated October 11, 2023, indicated that six beef ravioli was a standard portion. Observations on Wednesday, November 1, 2023, revealed that the lunch meal consisted of cheese ravioli, marinara sauce, Italian parmesan vegetable medley, garlic french bread, and pineapple upside down cake. The posted menu outside of the dining hall indicated that the lunch meal was to be beef ravioli. Interview with the Dietary Manager on November 1, 2023, at 2:48 p.m., revealed that she was not working during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, clinical record reviews, as well as observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop individualized care plans that included the resident's individualized care needs for two of 20 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 13). Findings include: A facility policy for Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, dated July 31, 2023, included that the interdisciplinary team, in conjunction with the resident and his or her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. The comprehensive person-centered care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the required comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs). A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 4, dated August 25, 2023, revealed that the resident was able to make herself understood and understood others, was dependent on staff for personal care needs, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. A documentation report, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 17). Findings include: A facility policy for Plans of care dated July 31, 2023, included that assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the residents' conditions change. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 17, dated September 9, 2023, indicated that the resident could make herself understood and could understand others, required extensive assistance with personal care needs, and had diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease. A care plan for Resident 17, dated August 7, 2023, revealed that the resident was at risk for falls and was to have a fall mat on the right side of her bed. Observations of Resident 17 on November 2, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, clinical records, and the facility's investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible and failed to develop and implement interventions to prevent falls for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 6) who had a history of falling. Findings include: The facility's policy for managing falls and fall risk, dated July 31, 2023, indicated that staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and try to minimize complications from falling. If falling recurs despite initial interventions, staff will implement additional or different interventions. If underlying causes cannot be readily identified or corrected, staff will try various interventions, based on assessment of the nature or category of falling until falling is reduced or stopped, or until the reason for the continuation of the falling is identified as unavoidable. In conjunction with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that weekly weights were obtained as recommended by the dietician for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 4) who had a weight loss. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated August 25, 2023, revealed that the resident was able to make herself understood and could understand others, was dependent on staff for personal care needs, and had diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive. A care plan for Resident 4, dated July 11,2023, indicated that the resident had the actual weight loss related to recommended mechanical and therapeutic diet. A care plan approach, dated July 27, 2023, revealed that the resident was to receive weights as necessary. A dietician note for Resident 4, dated August 7, 2023, revealed that she had unplanned weight loss with a plan to provide weekly weights to monitor more closely. A dietician note for Resident 4, dated September 14, 2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-09 · tag F0620 — widespread
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's admissions agreement, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to establish an admissions policy that did not request/require residents to waive potential facility liability for losses of personal property. Findings include: An undated admission agreement given to every new resident included the statement that the facility would not be responsible for the loss of the resident's personal property, such as money, documents, clothing, or other personal effects. The agreement did not describe the types of losses that the facility would be liable for. Interview with a group of residents on August 8, 2023, at 1:30 p.m. revealed that they were not offered a locked box for storing personal items or valuables until they had something stolen or missing. They indicated that they would have accepted a locked box to store valuables or money in their rooms if they were offered it on admission. Interview with the Director of Nursing on August 9, 2023, at 2:35 p.m. confirmed that the facility had residents sign the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-09 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Minimum Data Set (MDS) validation report, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Care Area Assessment Process of comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments and comprehensive assessments were completed in the required time frame for five of 89 residents reviewed (Residents 21, 30, 53, 62, 78). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2019, indicated that for admission MDS assessments, the assessment completion date, and the Care Area Assessment (CAA - the process of completing an in-depth assessment of triggered, potentially problematic care areas) completion date (Item V0200B2) were to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-09 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required time frame for nine of 89 residents reviewed (Residents 20, 35, 46, 56, 69, 74, 94, 96, 98). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2019, indicated that the assessment reference date (ARD - the last day of the assessment's look-back period) of a quarterly MDS assessment must be no more than 92 days after the ARD of the most recent assessment of any type, and the assessment was to have a completion date (Section Z0500B) that was no later than the ARD plus 14 calendar days. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 20 had an ARD of May 19, 2023, but it was not completed (Section Z0500B) until June 4, 2023. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-09 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument, clinical records, and the Minimum Data Set validation report, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments to the required electronic system, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) System, within 14 days of completion for 53 of 89 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 15, 16, 17, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 34, 35, 38, 51, 52, 55, 57, 59, 60, 62, 63, 64, 65, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 98, 99, 100, 101). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (federally-mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2019, indicated that comprehensive MDS assessments must be transmitted electronically within 14 days of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-09 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for four of 89 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 17, 71, 74). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2019, revealed that Section O0100C (Oxygen therapy) was to be coded with the number of days the resident received supplemental oxygen during the seven-day assessment period. An Annual MDS for Resident 4, dated May 31, 2023, revealed that section O0100C was coded (yes), indicating that the resident did receive supplemental oxygen while a resident in the facility during the seven-day look-back assessment period. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 4, dated May, 2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, as well as observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop individualized care plans that included the resident's individualized care needs for four of 89 residents reviewed (Residents 5, 46, 61, 67). Findings include: A facility policy for Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, dated July 31, 2023, included that the interdisciplinary team, in conjunction with the resident and his or her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. The comprehensive person-centered care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the required comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs). A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 5, dated May 4, 2023, revealed that the resident was understood and able to understand others, required supervision for personal care needs, and had diagnoses that included dementia with agitation and major depressive disorder.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physicians orders were followed for two of 89 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 125) Findings include: The facility's policy for Nursing Care of the Resident with Diabetes, dated July 31, 2023, indicated that for asymptomatic (no symptoms) responsive residents with hypoglycemia (blood sugar less than 70 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl)) staff were to give the resident an oral form of rapidly absorbed glucose (sugar) and recheck the blood sugar in 15 minutes. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated June 4, 2023, revealed that the resident was understood and able to understand others, required extensive assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnosis that included diabetes. A care plan for insulin dependent diabetes for Resident 4, dated July 19, 2022, indicated to obtain glucometer (device used to measure blood sugar) readings and report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-09 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed at least annually for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 3, Nurse Aide 4, Nurse Aide 5). Findings include: Review of Nurse Aide 3' personnel file revealed that she was hired December 20, 2019. There was no evidence that Nurse Aide 3 had a performance evaluation completed since her hire date. Review of Nurse Aide 4's personnel file revealed that she was hired August 22, 1988. There was no evidence that Nurse Aide 4 had a performance evaluation completed since 2019. Review of Nurse Aide 5's personnel file revealed that she was hired December 18, 1989. There was no evidence that Nurse Aide 5 had a performance evaluation completed since 2019. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on August 9, 2023, at 12:30 p.m. confirmed that performance evaluations were not completed for any staff since 2019 and that they should be done annually. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and written menus, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their planned menu. Findings include: The facility's policy for menus, dated July 31, 2023, revealed that menus are served as written unless changed in response to preference, unavailability of an item, or a special meal. The written menu for the week of August 7, 2023, revealed that there was to be chicken Alfredo, buttered noodles, buttered chopped spinach, dinner roll, margarine and oatmeal raisin cookie served for lunch on August 7, 2023, and on Tuesday, August 8, 2023, there was to be lemon pepper fish, parslied white rice, seasoned asparagus cuts, dinner roll, margarine, chocolate brownie, and tartar sauce. Observations on Monday, August 7, 2023, revealed that the lunch meal consisted of turkey with gravy, mashed potatoes, spinach, and cake. There was no chicken Alfredo, buttered noodles, or cookie. Observations on Tuesday, August 8, 2023, revealed that the lunch meal consisted of a hamburger steak with gravy, white rice, asparagus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required notice to the resident or the resident's representative following the end of their Medicare coverage, or failed to provide 48-hour advanced notice, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 90) and failed to provide the notice timely to one of three residents reviewed (Resident 125). Findings include: Resident 90's medical record revealed that he began Medicare A services on May 11, 2023, and his last covered day was May 25, 2023. The medical record indicated that the facility initiated discontinuation from Medicare Part A coverage and that the resident's benefit days were not exhausted. The facility had no documented evidence that the resident was issued a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form or an Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) as required. A SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form, completed by the facility and dated February 10, 2023, revealed that Medicare coverage for Resident 125 started on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment related to the storage of wheelchairs in the main dining room. Findings include: Observations on August 7, 2023, at 1:06 p.m. revealed that there were eight wheelchairs stored in the corner of the main dining room on the third floor around the piano and a table. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 1 on August 7, 2023, at 1:19 p.m. revealed that the wheelchairs are stored in the main dining room on the third floor because there is not enough room for them in the residents' rooms. Interview with the Director of Nursing on August 7, 2023, at 2:49 p.m. confirmed that the chairs should not be stored in the main dining room. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management. 28 Pa. Code 201.29(j) Resident rights. 28 Pa. Code 207.2(a) Administrator's responsibility.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set assessment for one of 89 residents reviewed (Resident 14). Findings include: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides guidance and instructions for the completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs) revealed that the facility must conduct a comprehensive assessment of a resident within 14 days after the facility determines, or should have determined, that there has been a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition. The RAI Manual revealed that staff should complete a significant change MDS when a resident has a decline that will not normally resolve itself without interventions by staff, impacts more than one area of the resident's health status, and requires interdisciplinary review and/or revision of the resident's care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of 89 residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: A facility policy for Plans of care dated July 31, 2023, indicated that resident assessments are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and their condition changes. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated June 4, 2023, revealed that the resident was understood and able to understand others, required extensive assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included encephalopathy (brain disease that alters the function of the brain) and diabetes. Physician's orders for Resident 4, dated July 13, 2023, included an order that the resident be fed all meals by nursing staff. A review of care plans for Resident 4, revised June 14, 2023, included that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies, clinical records, and facility investigation reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that assistance devices to prevent accidents or injury were in place as care planned for one of 89 residents reviewed (Residents 59), and that the facility failed to complete safety assessments for one of 89 residents reviewed (Resident 71) who used an air mattress. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding bed safety, dated July 31, 2023, indicated that the resident's sleeping environment shall be assessed by the interdisciplinary team, considering the resident's safety, medical conditions, comfort, and freedom of movement, as well as input from the resident and family regarding previous sleeping habits and bed environment. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 59, dated June 29, 2023, revealed that the resident could make himself understood and could understand others, required supervision with personal care needs, and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that central venous catheters were flushed per facility policy for one of 89 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding flushing central venous catheters (a thin tube inserted into a vein and used long-term for the administration of fluids and/or medications), dated July 31, 2023, indicated that the catheter was to be flushed before and after it was used to administer medication. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated May 3, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, needed extensive assistance for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included urinary tract infection. Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated August 1, 2023, included and order for the resident's peripherally-inserted central catheter (PICC - a type of central venous catheter) to receive 500 milligrams (mg) of Meropenem (an antibiotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for tracheostomy care (care of a surgical incision in the neck that creates an opening into the windpipe) included what size inner cannula (an inner tube inserted within the main outer cannula of the tracheostomy tube) to use for one of 89 residents reviewed (Resident 68). Findings include: The facility's policy for tracheostomy care, dated July 31, 2023, indicated that staff should check physicians' orders prior to providing tracheostomy care. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 68, dated July 19, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance with daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included cancer of the head, face and neck, and presence of a tracheostomy. Physician's orders for Resident 68, dated August 8, 2023, included that the resident receive tracheostomy care that included to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were assessed and received trauma-informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers for residents with the diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (a mental and behavioral disorder that develops related to a terrifying event) for two of 89 residents reviewed (Residents 43, 67). Findings include: A comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 43, dated June 20, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included depression and PTSD. A review of Resident 43's care plan, dated February 20, 2020, indicated that the resident had PTSD and depression. There was no documented evidence the facility identified Resident 43's specific triggers that could re-traumatize the resident or implement measures as to how facility staff could prevent or minimize triggers from occurring. Interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician performed the initial comprehensive visit with the resident for one of 89 residents reviewed (Resident 125). Findings include: Resident 125's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged to home on January 20, 2023, and again admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner's (CRNP, a registered nurse who has advanced education and clinical training in a health care specialty area) note for Resident 125, dated January 11, 2023, revealed that the resident was seen by the CRNP. Additional CRNP notes, dated January 18, 2023; February 1, 2023; and February 10, 2023, revealed that all visits were completed by the CRNP and not the attending physician. A CRNP note, dated January 11, 2023, was signed by the physician; however, it stated that the resident was seen by the CRNP and would be seen later when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) surveys ending September 20, 2022, and Feburary 8, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending August 9, 2023, identified repeated deficiencies related to quality of care, safety/accidents, and homelike environment. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding a failure to ensure that the environment was homelike, cited during the survey ending on February 8, 2023, revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ABRAHAM SMILOW — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a private-equity firm. That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • LADS AVENUE ASSOCIATES LLC — private equity · 1.50% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GHC SNF OPCO HOLDING COMPANY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2023
SMILOW, ABRAHAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF95%since 04/01/2023
BLOUGH, BRENDAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/29/2023
THIMONS, DAVIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
GHC CONSULTING COMPANY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
GHC SNF PROPCO HOLDING COMPANY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025
MEYERSDALE SNF PROPCO COMPANY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
T3 REAL ESTATE INITIATIVES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-44.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$624K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 90%Medicare 2%Other / private 8%

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $624K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$336per resident / day
operating cost
$10,205per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$232per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395661. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next