No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Greenfield Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

1521 West 54th Street, Erie, PA 16509 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 133 certified beds · (814) 864-0671 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse2 actual-harm citations$15,935 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,935 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-08)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5039 Peach St · (814) 983-0467 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.3 mi
5430 Peach St · (814) 868-4624 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
BFA Mart1.1 mi
1511 W 38th St · (814) 315-1955 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Wander Park, 1723 Berry St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5440 Washington Ave · (814) 864-1920

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased28.1%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.7%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.4%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.2%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.1%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.2%93.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.0%25.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.2%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine39.0%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.3%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.7%9.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.201.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.411.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

32.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

32.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
4.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.39U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 4.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF32.7%CMS range 23.6–45.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 8.0–17.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge4.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge27.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge9.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.6%CMS range 5.2–14.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.981.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
0.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.77
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.41
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
50.0%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 133 beds and averages 68.1 residents a day — about 51% occupied, or roughly 65 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-27)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-04)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-01-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical and facility records, review of the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual 2025 (RAI-assessment guide used to plan the provision of care for residents), and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Resident R6 was free of neglect during care, which resulted in actual harm of a laceration to the left posterior head, fracture of left pubic bone with a two part fracture that extended into the pubic symphysis (the front and lower part of left hip bone which separated and fractured), left scapholunate ligament tear (a wrist injury involving bones of wrist that separate due to a tear in the connecting ligament), and shock (a life-threatening medical emergency caused by inadequate blood flow to tissues resulting in oxygen not getting to organs of body resulting in potential organ failure and death) for one of 17 residents reviewed (Resident R6). Findings include: A facility policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation and clinical records, review of the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual 2025 (RAI-assessment guide used to plan the provision of care for residents), and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure essential resident safety measures were followed to prevent a fall for one of 17 residents (Resident R6), which resulted in actual harm of a laceration to the left posterior head, fracture of left pubic bone with a two part fracture that extended into the pubic symphysis (the front and lower part of left hip bone which separated and fractured), left scapholunate ligament tear (a wrist injury involving bones of wrist that separate due to a tear in the connecting ligament), and shock (a life-threatening medical emergency caused by inadequate blood flow to tissues resulting in oxygen not getting to organs of body resulting in potential organ failure and death). Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, manufacturer's guidelines, facility records, clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor interventions and complete assessments for a resident at risk for elopement (an at-risk individual leaving a supervised care setting without staff knowledge) (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Elopement and Wandering Residents dated 1/16/26, indicated Residents will be assessed for risk of elopement and unsafe wandering upon admission and throughout their stay by the interdisciplinary care plan team. and Charge nurses and unit managers will monitor the implementation of interventions, response to interventions, and document accordingly. Review of manufacturer's guidelines for wander guard (a device with a small box on a plastic bracelet placed on an at-risk wandering person to alert the staff if that person attempts to exit the facility without staff supervision) indicated Test each signaling device before use. Thereafter, test the device daily and record the results in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have complete and accurate documentation regarding showers for one resident reviewed (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Documentation in Medical Record dated 1/16/26, indicated Documentation shall be completed at the time of service. and Documentation shall be accurate, relevant, and complete. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/10/24, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease (brain disorder that slowly destroys memory, thinking skills, and, over time the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), gastro esophageal reflux disease (a condition when stomach acid repeatedly flows back up into your throat), and weakness. Review of Resident R1's shower task (an area in point of care where the nursing assistants document showers) revealed Resident R1 was to receive a shower every Monday and Friday. Further review revealed for the month of April 2026, the shower task lacked documentation that a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders and residents Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a legal document specifying the resident/responsible party choices regarding life-sustaining treatments) were consistent and failed to ensure that the resident/responsible party were provided with written information on advanced directives or assisted with the opportunity to formulate advanced directives regarding life sustaining treatment for six of 20 residents reviewed (Residents R1, R5, R7, R30, R50 and R62).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Communication of Code Status dated [DATE], indicated It is the policy of this facility to adhere to residents' rights to formulate advance directives. The facility will follow facility policy regarding a resident's right to request. to formulate an Advance Directive/POLST. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-27 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician signed and dated all orders during visits for seven of 20 residents reviewed (Residents R1, R7, R8, R10, R11, R30, and R62). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Physician Visits and Physician Delegation dated 11/1/25, indicated The physician should: See resident within 30 days of initial admission to the facility. The resident must be seen at least once every 30 calendar days for the first 90 calendar days after admission and at least every 60 days thereafter by physician or physician delegate as appropriate by state law. Sign and date all orders. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 8/11/23, with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-when your lungs do not have adequate air flow), bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes extreme mood swings with emotional highs and emotional lows), and general anxiety disorder (a condition that causes a person to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-27 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, resident interviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician visits were conducted at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission and at least 60 days thereafter for three of 17 residents reviewed (R8, R11, and R62). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Physician Visits and Physician Delegation dated 11/1/25, indicated The physician should: See resident within 30 days of initial admission to the facility. The resident must be seen at least once every 30 calendar days for the first 90 calendar days after admission and at least every 60 days thereafter by physician or physician delegate as appropriate by state law. Date, write and sign a progress note for each visit. Sign and date all orders. During an interview on 1/25/26, at approximately 10:30 a.m. Resident R8 expressed that he/she has not seen his/her physician face to face since he/she was admitted to the facility. Review of Resident R8's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/14/22, with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, and review of resident council minutes and grievances, and review of nursing staffing documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff and services to promote the physical and mental well-being and meet the needs for six of 20 residents interviewed (Residents R6, R8, R9, R30, R53, and R57). Findings include: Interviews during the Resident Council meeting on 1/25/26, between 12:00 p.m. and 12:30 p.m., revealed Residents R8, R9, R30, R53, and R57, in attendance stated the call bells are not answered in a timely manner with all indicating they wait greater than 30 minutes. Resident R30 had concerns related to staff not responding to his/her call bell timely and it took hours for call bell response on 1/14/26, which resulted in him/her soiling his/her brief (incontinence product). Resident R9 had concerns related to staff responding timely to their call bell to close their bathroom door. Resident R9 indicated that he/she can transfer themselves to the toilet independently, however, cannot shut the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, manufacturer's guidelines, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure expired medications were discarded in a timely manner in two of two medication carts reviewed (West North Cart and East North Cart).Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Labeling of Medications and Biologicals dated 11/01/25, revealed Labels for multi-use vials must include: All opened or accessed vials should be discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies (shorter or longer) date for that opened vial. Manufacturer's guidelines for Humalog insulin (a fast-acting insulin used to manage blood sugar levels in people with diabetes), revealed that after opened vials and pre-filled pens should be discarded after 28 days. Manufacturer's guidelines for Lantus insulin (a long-acting insulin used to manage blood sugar levels in people with diabetes), revealed that after opened vials and pre-filled pens should be discarded after 28 days. Observation on 1/24/26, at 4:15 p.m. of the [NAME] North medication cart revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control practices regarding enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for two of two resident units (East and [NAME] Unit). Findings include: Facility policy, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 11/01/25, revealed it is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities. Implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions - Make gowns and gloves available immediately near or outside of the resident's room. Note: face protection may also be needed if performing activity with risk of splash or spray (i.e., wound protection may also be needed if performing activity with risk of splash or spray (i.e., wound protection may also be needed if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a bath/shower as resident preference for two of 20 residents reviewed (Residents R8 and R62).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Resident Showers dated 11/1/25, indicated Residents will be provided showers as per request or as per facility schedule. and Document resident shower in point of care if refused, given, or bed bath given. Review of Resident R8's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/14/22, with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (a disease that affects the kidney's ability to filter waste products and extra fluid from the body), diabetes (a health condition that is caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Interview with Resident R8 on 1/26/26, at approximately 10:30 a.m. revealed that he/she stated, I have not received a shower in weeks, it would be nice to get a shower and not just washed up in the bathroom. Review of resident R8's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical and facility records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation related to falls for one of 17 residents reviewed (Resident R6). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Fall Prevention Program dated 11/01/25, revealed Each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls. When any resident experiences a fall, the facility will a. Assess the resident. b. Complete a post-fall assessment. c. Complete an incident report. d. Notify physician and family. e. Review the resident's care plan and update as indicated. f. Document all assessments and actions. g. Obtain witness statements in the case of injury. Resident R6's clinical record revealed an admission date of 2/08/25, with diagnoses that included shock, closed head injury (occurs when a sudden, violent impact to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 43 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility did not ensure the garbage and refuse was disposed of properly for one dumpster. Findings include: No facility policy provided. Observations on 1/24/26, at 5:15 p.m. revealed the dumpster open, without a full lid to secure the top of the dumpster, allowing garbage to be freely exposed. During an interview on 1/24/26, at 5:15 p.m. the Dietary Manager confirmed that the top of the dumpster was open without a lid, allowing the garbage to be freely exposed. He/She further confirmed that the dumpster lids should always be closed and tightly fitted when not in use to prevent insect/rodents to be attracted to area. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and review of clinical and facility records and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete documentation related to falls for one of 17 residents reviewed (Resident R6). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Fall Prevention Program dated 11/01/25, revealed Each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls. When any resident experiences a fall, the facility will a. Assess the resident. b. Complete a post-fall assessment. c. Complete an incident report. d. Notify physician and family. e. Review the resident's care plan and update as indicated. f. Document all assessments and actions. g. Obtain witness statements in the case of injury. Resident R6's clinical record revealed an admission date of 2/08/25, with diagnoses that included shock, closed head injury (occurs when a sudden,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy (explanation of how long a bed can be held during a leave of absence and the cost per day) and failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider upon transfer to the hospital for four of four residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents R2, R5, R6, and R7).Findings include: Facility policy entitled Bed-Hold Notice dated 1/7/26, indicated that It is the policy of this facility to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident representative regarding bed hold practices both well in advance, and at the time of, a transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave. The policy further states In the event of an emergency transfer of a resident, the facility will provide written notice of the facility's bed-hold policies to the resident and/or the resident representative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate a baseline care plan and provide a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary to the resident and/or representative for three of 29 residents reviewed (Closed Record Residents CR1, CR2, and CR3). Findings include:A facility policy entitled Baseline Care Plan dated 11/01 /25, revealed the facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of care. The baseline care plan will be developed within 48 hours of a resident ' s admission. Include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident including, but not limited to: Initial goals based on admission orders, Physician orders, Dietary orders, Therapy services, Social services, Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) recommendation, if applicable. A written summary of the baseline care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to transcribe and act upon physician orders for medications ordered at time of admission for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R2) and failed to follow physician's orders regarding the administration of seizure medications for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R2).Findings include: Facility policy entitled Medication Orders dated 1/7/26, indicated for written transfer orders sent with a resident by a hospital or other health care facility the facility will Implement a transfer order without further validation, if it is signed and dated by the resident's current attending physician, unless the order is unclear or incomplete, or the date signed is different from the date or admission. If the order is unsigned, or signed by another physician, or the date is other than the date of admission, the receiving nurse should verify the order with the current attending physician before medications are administered. The nurse should document verification on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and documentation, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have complete and accurate documentation regarding showers on four of four residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R3, and R4).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Resident Showers dated 11/1/24, indicated .to assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene., Partial baths may be given between regular shower schedules. and Document resident shower in Point of Care (an area where nursing assistants document in the clinical record). Review of facility shower schedule revealed resident room numbers and the day of the week that the residents in that room number are scheduled to receive a shower. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 9/19/25, with diagnoses that included diabetes (a health condition that is caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident R1's shower sheets (a sheet of paper that the nursing assistants document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-05 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician sign and date all orders during each of his/her visits for five of five residents reviewed (Residents R1, R3, R4, and R5). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Physician Visits and Physician Delegation dated 11/1/24, indicated The physician should: See resident within 30 days of initial admission to the facility. The resident must be seen at least once every 30 calendar days for the first 90 calendar days after admission and at least every 60 days thereafter by physician or physician delegate as appropriate by state law. Sign and date all orders. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 6/6/25, with diagnoses that included hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), and bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes extreme mood swings with emotional highs and emotional lows). Review of Resident R1's clinical record lacked evidence of the last time his/her physician reviewed, signed, and dated his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's plan of correction for previous survey, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiency and ensure that the plan to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) dated 11/1/24, indicated Program systematic analysis and systemic action to ensure improvements are sustained. The facility's deficiency and plan of correction for a complaint survey ending March 18, 2025, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulation. The results of the current survey, ending September 5, 2025, identified repeated deficiency related to a failure to ensure that the physician sign and date all orders during each of his/her visits. The facility's plan of correction for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, facility documentation, and facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records for two of six residents reviewed (Closed Record Resident CR2 and Resident R5). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Assessing Falls and Their Cause dated 11/01/24, indicated that when a resident falls, the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 1. The condition in which the resident was found (e.g. resident found laying on the floor between bed and chair). 2. Assessment data, including vital signs and any obvious injuries. 3. Interventions, first aid, or treatment administered. 4. Notification of the physician and family, as indicated. 5. Completion of a falls risk assessment. 6. Appropriate interventions taken to prevent future falls. 7. The signature and title of the person recording the data. Resident CR2's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/03/23, with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia uncontrollable (age-related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-18 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician sign and date all orders and write, date, and sign a progress note during each of his/her visits for six of seven residents reviewed (Residents R1, R3, R4, R5, R6 and R7). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Physician Visits and Physician Delegation dated 11/1/24, indicated The physician should: See resident within 30 days of initial admission to the facility. The resident must be seen at least once every 30 calendar days for the first 90 calendar days after admission and at least every 60 days thereafter by physician or physician delegate as appropriate by state law. Date, write and sign a progress note for each visit. Sign and date all orders . Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/1/25, with diagnoses that included fibromyalgia (a disorder that causes widespread muscle pain, tiredness, sleep problems and thought difficulties), and diabetes (a health condition that caused by the body's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident privacy and dignity related to the resident's room environment for one of 11 residents reviewed (Resident R2). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity dated 11/1/24, revealed It is the practice . treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances residents' quality of life . and All staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect . Review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/5/24, with diagnoses that included anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be nervous, uneasy, or worried about something or someone), difficulty walking, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident R2's physician orders revealed an order dated 1/6/24, for bedside commode at all times. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-04 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility employee in-service training records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assure that staff completed all the required mandatory trainings for the yearly Nurse Aide (NA) 12-hour mandatory trainings. Findings include: Review of requested records or evidence of in-service mandatory training for all NA's from 1/2024 through 1/2025 was incomplete upon review. The facility was unable to provide complete evidence of completed competencies the the past year. During an interview on 1/31/25, at 2:30 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that no evidence could be provided of NA's 12-hour mandatory in-service trainings as required. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3)(5) Nursing services 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.19(7) Personnel policies and procedures

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-04 · tag F0661 — pattern
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to include the recapitulation of stay (summary of resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility) that included a reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post-discharge medications for one of four closed record residents reviewed (Closed Record Resident CR82). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Discharge Summary dated 11/01/24, indicated that upon discharge of a resident a discharge summary will be provided to the receiving care provider at the time the resident leaves the facility. Resident CR82's clinical record revealed and admission date of 10/05/24, with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis of left knee (type of arthritis that occurs when flexible tissue at ends of bones in knee that wears down), pancytopenia (a blood disorder that occurs when the bone marrow does not form all three types of blood cells - red, white, and platelets), history…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to promote the physical and mental well-being and meet the needs of seven of 21 residents interviewed (Residents R2, R55, R34, R6, R186, R68, R36, R2, R41, and R19). Findings include: Interviews during the Resident Council meeting on 1/29/25, between 1:00 p.m. and 1:45 p.m., revealed seven out of seven alert and oriented residents in attendance had concerns related to staff not responding to their call bells timely. Resident R68 indicated that it could take 45 minutes or more for his/her call bell to be answered and staff are observed on their phones and occasionally have earbuds in and talking on the phone when performing care. Resident R68 stated that he/she is left wet for long periods of time waiting for assistance. Resident R68 also disclosed that on weekends there is no use asking to get out of bed, because you will wait all day for assistance to get back in bed. Resident R6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical and facility records, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the use of dentures for two of 21 residents reviewed (Residents R51 and R187 ). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled, Care of Dentures with an annual review date of 11/01/2024, revealed Dentures that are missing, damaged, or lost and the facility or facility are at fault, a referral will be made promptly within three days. Facility responsibilities include dropped, stolen, and/or broken by our employees. facility is not responsible for the resident discarding themselves or ill fitting dentures or partials at admission. Facility will assist resident/responsible party with non-facility related denture issues. Resident's R51's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/23/22 with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (a disease in which the immune system destroys the protective covering of nerves resulting in nerve damage disrupting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility and clinical records, resident and staff interviews, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a bath/shower as resident preference for two of 21 residents reviewed (Residents R2 and R68). Findings include: A facility policy, Resident Showers, dated 11/01/24, revealed it is the practice of this facility to assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene, stimulate circulation and help prevent skin issues as per current standards of practice. Residents will be provided showers as resident preference. Resident's R2's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/28/23, with diagnoses that included lupus (a disease when the immune system attacks your own tissue and organs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of diseases that affects the lungs and breathing), heart disease, and rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic inflammatory disorder that typically affects the hands and feet). During an interview with Resident R2 on 1/28/25, at 2:25 p.m., he/she indicated their bath/shower was scheduled for Wednesday and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, review of the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual 2019 (RAI-assessment guide used to plan the provision of care for residents), and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a change in condition timely for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R51). Findings include: The facility policy entitled The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician; and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification. Resident's R51's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/23/22, with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (a disease in which the immune system destroys the protective covering of nerves resulting in nerve damage disrupting communication between body and brain), Alzheimer's disease (a disease of the brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assess and ensure safe smoking practices for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R50). Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Resident Smoking/Nonsmoking Facility dated 11/01/24, indicated that the facility will provide a safe and healthy environment for residents, visitors, and employees, including safety as related to smoking; smoking is prohibited; all residents and family members will be notified of this policy during the admission process, and as needed; and included electronic cigarettes. Resident R50's clinical record revealed an initial admission date of 4/12/22, with diagnoses that included nicotine dependence, respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), end-stage renal disease and dependence on dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly), and dependence on supplemental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper care of respiratory equipment for two of 21 residents reviewed (Residents R27 and R50). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Oxygen Concentrator dated 11/01/24, indicated that the concentrator filters are cleaned weekly and that the main body cabinet should be dusted when needed and can be wiped down clean with a damp cloth and mild cleanser. A facility policy entitled CPAP/BiPAP [continuous positive airway pressure/bilevel positive airway pressure] Support dated 11/01/24, revealed the following: -Only a qualified and properly trained nurse or respiratory therapist should administer oxygen through a CPAP mask. -Review the resident's medical record to determine his/her baseline oxygen saturation or arterial blood gases (ABGs- measures the balance of oxygen and carbon dioxide in your blood to see how well your lungs are working), respiratory(organs that are involved in breathing), circulatory (delivers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility documents and clinical records, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records relating to dialysis communication for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R50). Findings include: The Nursing Home Dialysis Transfer Agreement signed on 1/02/25, revealed that the facility shall ensure that all appropriate medical, social, administrative, and other information accompany all Designated Residents at the time of transfer to the center, and that the facility will provide for the interchange of information useful or necessary for the care of the Designated Resident and will inform the Center of a contact person at the Facility whose responsibilities include oversight of provision of dialysis services by Center to the Designated Residents of Facility. Resident R50's clinical record revealed an initial admission date of 4/12/22, with diagnoses that included nicotine dependence, respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical and facility records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were administered, whether prescribed on a routine, emergency, or as needed basis, to not impede timely administration and adversely affect a resident's condition for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R234). Findings include: Facility pharmacy policy, Specialty Rx, Inc. PA ADS [Automated Dispensing System] Station Medication Policies and Procedures, dated 11/01/24, revealed Nursing and Pharmacy will use the ADS Station as an inventory, charging and information system for the control and distribution of medications for Emergency, First-Dose use and other situations where medications are not available from pharmacy. (NOT TO BE USED FOR CONTINUOUS DOSING). Emergency doses for narcotic medications removed from the ADS system will require a written order from a prescriber (order should include that medication can be taken from the ADS) and would require signature within 48 hours per regulations. The facility must contact the pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) vaccine guidance, facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to safely store medications in one of two medication rooms observed (East Wing). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Multi-Dose Vials (contain more than one dose of medication) dated [DATE], indicated that when a multiple dose vial is opened it shall be labeled with date open, medications will be discarded as per manufacturer guidelines for vaccines. Observation on [DATE], at 11:44 a.m. of the East Wing medication room revealed a multi-dose vial of Flucelvax (vaccine that protects against the flu) was opened, lacked an opened date, and lacked guidance related to discarding opened vials. During an interview at that time the Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that the multi-dose vial lacked an open date, and that staff cannot tell when the vaccine should be discarded. Review of the CDC web site revealed that the guidance for opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility and clinical records, observations, and staff and resident representative interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents with an indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to facilitate urine drainage) receive essential care for one of 21 residents reviewed with indwelling catheters (Resident R14). Findings include: Facility policy entitiled, Catheter Care dated 11/01/24, revealed it is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use. Privacy bags will be available and catheter drainage bags will be covered at all times while in use. Ensure drainage bag is located below the level of the bladder to discourage backflow of urine and not to be located on the floor. Resident R14's clinical record revealed an admission date of 9/25/20, with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral, and sacrococcygeal region (inflammation of bones of lower spine caused by infection),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown origin for three of nine residents reviewed (Residents R2, R8, and R9). Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Accidents and Incidents-Investigating and Reporting revised July 2017, revealed that: 1. Designated staff shall promptly initiate and document an investigation of the accident or incident. 2. The report shall include date, time of accident/incident; nature of injury; circumstances surrounding the accident/incident; where; names of witnesses and their accounts of the accident/incident; time physician was notified and the response; date and time of family notification; resident's condition, including vital signs; disposition of injured; corrective action; follow-up, pertinent information; and signature, title of person completing the report. 3. The accident/incident report will be reviewed by the safety committee for trends. Review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed an original…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the responsible party and/or the physician of injuries of unknown origin for two of nine residents reviewed (Residents R2 and R9). Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Accidents and Incidents-Investigating and Reporting revised July 2017, indicated that: 1. Designated staff shall promptly initiate and document an investigation of the accident or incident. 2. The report shall include time physician was notified and the response, and the date and time of family notification. Review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed an original admission date of 9/22/17, with diagnoses that included stroke with right-sided weakness, difficulty swallowing, Type 2 Diabetes (a disease that occurs when the body doesn't use insulin properly resulting in high blood sugar levels), high blood pressure, and ataxia (a neurological condition that causes a lack of voluntary muscle coordination, which can affect balance, speech, and eye movements).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, and facility documentation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate documentation as related to meal intake, medication administration records (MAR), and/or completion of treatment administration records (TAR) for six of six residents reviewed (Residents R2, R3, R4, R7, R8, and R9). Findings include: Review of facility policy dated 1/1/24, entitled Charting and Documentation indicated that any services provided to the resident shall be documented in the resident's medical record. Review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/7/17, with diagnoses that included dementia (a condition that affects the brains' ability to think, remember things, and function), stroke, and high blood pressure. Resident R2's clinical record lacked documentation indicating if he/she consumed their breakfast meal and what percent was consumed on 17 (2/27/24, 2/28/24, 3/1/24, 3/2/24, 3/3/24, 3/4/24, 3/5/34, 3/7/24, 3/8/24, 3/9/24, 3/10/24, 3/11/24, 3/12/24, 3/13/24, 3/17/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment (one of two food steamers, and one of one walk-in coolers) in safe, operating condition. Findings include: A facility policy entitled Equipment-Facility Repair/Maintenance Needs dated 9/14/23, indicated that the facility will ensure timely attention to any facility equipment or items that require attention, repair, or replacement. Observations on 1/30/24, 11:20 a.m. in the main kitchen revealed the walk-in cooler temperature log posted on door as out of order beginning 1/01/24, and one of two food steamers with an out of order sign posted on the front, and Dietary Employee E4 waiting for room in the food steamer to keep food hot. Review of facility records revealed the walk-in cooler has been out of service since the beginning of December 2023, a work order dated 1/19/24, to repair/replace the food steamer and walk-in cooler, lacked signatures indicating acceptance of the estimates. During an interview on 1/31/24, at 11:00 a.m. Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents and their responsible parties were afforded the opportunity to participate in the care planning process for three of 23 residents reviewed (Residents R44, R56, and R71). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Care Plan-Interdisciplinary Team dated 09/14/23, revealed that The resident, the resident's family and/or the resident's legal representative/guardian or surrogate are encouraged to participate in the development of and revisions to the resident's care plan. During an interview on 1/30/24, at 1:16 p.m. Resident R44 indicated that he/she didn't remember being invited to or participating in care plan meetings. Resident R44's clinical record revealed an admission date of 01/03/23, that he/she is alert and oriented and had diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure, chronic pain syndrome, and iron deficiency. The clinical record lacked evidence that Resident R44 was invited to participate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of resident care needs) for four of 23 residents reviewed (Residents R2, R5, R37, and R72). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled, Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment dated 9/14/23, indicated that Any person who completes any portion of the MDS assessment, tracking form, or correction request form is required to sign the assessment certifying the accuracy of that portion of that assessment. The information captured on the assessment reflects the status of the resident during the observation period for that assessment. Resident R2's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/30/99, with diagnoses that included Type 2 diabetes (disorder of improper blood sugar usage in the body), muscle weakness, and traumatic brain injury. Resident R2's order summary revealed that a Victoza injection (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) Form 10123 as required for two of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices (Residents R70 and R279). Findings include: The Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Notification Review revealed that Resident R70 began receiving skilled services on 9/18/23, that the last covered day of Part A Services was 10/31/23, and that the facility initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A Services when benefit days were not exhausted. Documentation indicated that Resident R70 remained in the facility following the last day covered, and that a NOMNC CMS Form 10123 was not issued. The SNF Beneficiary Notification Review revealed that Resident R279 began receiving skilled services on 10/26/23, that the last covered day of Part A Services was 11/6/23, and that the facility initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A Services when benefit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary to the resident and/or representative for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident R37). Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Care Plan-Baseline dated 9/14/23, indicated, The resident and/or representative are provided a written summary of the baseline care plan (in a language that the resident/representative can understand) that includes, but is not limited to the following: a. The stated goals and objectives of the resident; b. A summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions; c. Any services and treatments to be administered by the facility and personnel acting on behalf of the facility; and d. Any updated information based on the details of the comprehensive care plan, as necessary. Resident R37's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/02/23, with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, dependance on renal dialysis, and type 2 diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for two of 23 residents reviewed (Residents R14 and R72). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 9/14/23, indicated that an interdisciplinary team, in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. Review of a facility policy entitled Wanderguard dated 9/14/23, indicated that a physcian's order must be obtained and a careplan will be implemented once a wanderguard (alarming device attached to a resident to alert staff of their leaving a designated area/facility) is placed on a resident. Resident R72's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/13/23, with diagnoses that included dementia, alcohol abuse and age related cognitive decline. Resident R72's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Pennsylvania Code Title 49 Professional and Vocational Standards, clinical records, and facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow nursing standards of practice related to medical diagnosing for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident R21). Findings include: Review of Pennsylvania Code Title 49. Professional and Vocational Standards § 21.11. General functions. (c) stated: The registered nurse may not engage in areas of highly specialized practice without adequate knowledge of and skills in the practice areas involved. Resident R21's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/04/23, with diagnoses including right hip fracture, Parkinson's Disease (a progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and the parts of the body controlled by the nerves), Paranoid Schizophrenia (serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves - paranoia commonly happens with schizophrenia), and unspecified dementia. The clinical record also revealed a physician's orders dated 5/23/23, for Nuplazid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the application of a wanderguard bracelet for one of five residents reviewed for their usage (Resident R72) and failed to obtain a physician's order for the application of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP- a machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep) for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident R14). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Wanderguard dated 9/14/23, indicated that a physcian's order must be obtained and a careplan will be implemented once a wanderguard (alarming device attached to a resident to alert staff of their leaving a designated area/facility) is placed on a resident. Review of a facility policy entitled Medication and Treatment Orders dated 9/14/23, indicated that orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records and facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion received physician ordered treatment and services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one of one residents reviewed for range of motion (Resident R36). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Splints dated 9/14/23, indicated that Caregivers will apply the splint to the affected area, at the times scheduled by therapy. and Splinting will be charted . Review of Resident R36's clinical record revealed and admission date of 9/25/22, with diagnoses that included joint contracture (a condition when there is loss of joint mobility/movement), hypertension (high blood pressure), bradycardia (a condition when the heart beats slow), and atrial fibrillation (a condition when the heartbeat is irregular) Review of Resident R36's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 9/20/23, for a left knee brace to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to promote cleanliness and help prevent the spread of infection regarding respiratory care equipment according to physician's orders for two of two residents reviewed for oxygen usage (Residents R42 and R14). Finding include: Review of facility policy entitled Treatments - Oxygen Concentrators (machine that uses the air in the atmosphere, filters it, and gives you air that is 90%-95% oxygen) dated 9/14/23, indicated Maintenance: Daily/Weekly: Condenser filters: removed weekly . place filter in unit washing machine . put clean backup filter on concentrator and Change the oxygen tubing and filter every other week. Review of a facility policy entitled CPAP/BiPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep/Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure machine that provides non-invasive ventilation therapy used to help you breathe) Support dated 9/14/23, revealed machine cleaning involved;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to label a multi-dose injection pen of Lantus insulin (a long-acting insulin which is used to treat elevated blood sugar levels) with the date it was opened in one of two medication carts reviewed (West South Cart). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled, Medication Labeling and Storage dated 9/14/23, indicated that multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. Observation on 01/31/24, at 7:53 a.m. of the [NAME] South Cart revealed an opened multi-dose injection pen of Lantus insulin without an open date and instructions from the pharmacy on the storage bag to discard the medication 28 days after it is opened. At the time of the observation, Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E1 confirmed that the multi-dose injection pen of Lantus insulin did not have an open date. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1) Pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination (the spreading of germs/microorganisms from one surface to another) during wound care for one of five residents reviewed for wounds (Resident R16). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene dated 9/14/23, indicated that staff are to perform hand hygiene after removing gloves. A facility policy entitled Dressing, Dry/Clean dated 9/14/23, indicated that staff are to change gloves and/or perform hand hygiene after removing the soiled dressing, and after opening clean supplies. Observation on 2/02/24, at 9:20 a.m. of wound care revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E6 removed the soiled wound dressing, changed his/her gloves, and failed to perform hand hygiene prior to donning (put on) clean gloves. LPN Employee E6 cleansed the wound, changed his/her gloves, and failed to perform hand hygiene prior to donning clean gloves. During an interview at that time LPN Employee E6 confirmed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate services to maintain personal hygiene for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 8/21/23, with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (abnormality of brain function or structure and can cause a wide range of symptoms depending on the cause), respiratory failure, need for assistance with personal care, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) assessment for Resident R1, dated September 20, 2023, Section GG0130E revealed that the resident was totally dependent on staff for bathing. Review of Resident R1's current physician's orders lacked evidence that a frequency for bathing was ordered. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed lack of documentation for routine bathing and that Resident R1 was bathed on 10/07/23, 10/15/23, and 10/24/23, or three times during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, facility policies and documents, and the Pennsylvania Department of Health PAHAN-694, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection control protocols were followed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections on one of two nursing units (East Wing). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled COVID-19 Prevention, Response, and Reporting dated 9/14/23, indicated that all staff who enter the room of a resident with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection should adhere to standard precautions and use a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-approved particulate respirator with N95 filter masks (fit over the nose and mouth, and when properly fitted, can filter 95% of particles) or higher, gown, gloves, and eye protection. Review of the Pennsylvania Department of Health PAHAN-694 dated 5/11/23, instructed facilities to ensure everyone is aware of recommended IPC (Infection Prevention and Control)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and facility assessment, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility lacked evidence that clinical staff completed their competencies for their resident population of seven residents requiring respiratory treatments. Findings include: Review of the General Information policy, dated 1/5/23, indicated that evaluating and documenting competency of staff is required upon hire, annually and as otherwise indicated. Review of the Facility Wide Self Assessment dated 3/6/23, revealed that staff competency is required for Respiratory Treatment due to the Resident Population Assessment. The assessment also identified that seven residents were identified that required respiratory treatments. During an interview on 8/23/23, at approximately 12:54 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility lacked evidence that the clinical staff competencies were completed related to respiratory treatments. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-01-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and infection control documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an antibiotic stewardship program. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship Program, dated 11/01/25, revealed it is the policy of this facility to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program as part of the facility's overall infection prevention and control program. The purpose of the program is to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use. The Medical Director, Director of Nursing, and Consultant Pharmacist serve as the leaders of the Antibiotic Stewardship Program and receives support from the Administrator and other governing officials of the facility. The Antibiotic Stewardship Program leaders utilize existing resources to support antibiotic stewards' efforts by working with the following partners: Infection Preventionist-Consultant Laboratory-State and Local Health Departments. Licensed nurses participate in the program through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-02-04 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required nursing staffing information was posted on a daily basis. Findings include: Observations on 1/28/25, at 1:00 p.m., 1/29/25, at 9:00 a.m., and 1/30/25, at 1:00 p.m. revealed that the daily staffing posting was not posted in the facility. During an interview on 1/30/25, at 1:10 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator, confirmed that the staffing was not posted as required. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (c) Nursing services

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,935 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,935 — penalty dated 2026-01-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ABRAHAM SMILOW — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a private-equity firm. That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • LADS AVENUE ASSOCIATES LLC — private equity · 1.50% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GFD SNF OPCO HOLDING COMPANY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2023
SMILOW, ABRAHAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF95%since 04/01/2023
KACHEL, ELIZABETHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/14/2023
ROHRBACH, CHARLESIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
GFD SNF PROPCO HOLDING COMPANY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
HILLEL TROPPER 2016 IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
LADS AVENUE ASSOCIATES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
MOSHE TROOPER 2016 IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
T3 REAL ESTATE INITIATIVES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
WESTERN RESERVE PROPCO COMPANY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
WPG CONSULTING COMPANY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
TRAVITSKY, BARUCHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-28.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$443K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 4%Other / private 20%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $443K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$344per resident / day
operating cost
$10,450per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$268per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395262. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next