No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Quality Life Services - Apollo

151 Goodview Drive, Apollo, PA 15613 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 177 certified beds · (412) 727-3451 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$60,109 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (75) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $60,109 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-10)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
310 S 2nd St · (724) 478-2999 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1596 Hancock Ave · (724) 568-4144 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4971 State Route 66 · (724) 727-7503 · Call to confirm hours
Park
893 Pine Run Rd · (724) 727-3515 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
190 Pine Run Church Rd · (724) 727-3121

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.5%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.2%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.4%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.3%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.8%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.6%93.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.7%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.2%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine54.2%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.2%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.4%9.5%12.0%worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.9%CMS range 40.2–64.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 8.4–17.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified75.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.9–11.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.791.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
0.93
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.94
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.25
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
61.7%
Total nursing turnover
58.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 177 beds and averages 149.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

25
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-22)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

75 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 61 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical and facility record review, facility provided documents, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for two residents resulting in elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised and unauthorized location without staff's knowledge). This failure created an immediate jeopardy situation for two of 33 residents (Residents R1 and R2) identified as having a high risk for wandering.Findings include: Review of facility policy Elopement Prevention dated 4/17/25, revealed the facility properly assesses residents and plans their care to prevent accidents related to wandering behavior or elopement. The admitting nurse will perform an initial assessment. A care plan will be developed that reflects the potential for elopement and preventative measures. Admitting nurses or other staff members noting elopement risk and wandering behaviors must notify the nursing Unit Manager/Designee or the ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing). Should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, incident reports, hospital records, facility provided documents, resident interview, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from a preventable accident during a transfer in the facilities vehicle van, which resulted in actual physical harm (an abrasion to crown of head, abrasion to right knee, abrasion to left ankle, and three acute cervical (neck) fractures of C3, C4, and C5) for one of two residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of the facility Accidents and Incidents policy dated 4/16/26, indicated the facility will promote a safe environment for all residents. An accident/Incident is any happening, which is not consistent with routine operations or the routine care of the resident. Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/21/26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-01-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and incident reports and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect by not providing adequate supervision for one of three resident reviewed (Resident R1), which resulted in actual harm of a resident, resulting in a head laceration requiring transfer to the hospital. Findings include: A review of the facility policy, Resident Protection from abuse, neglect or exploitation, dated 4/17/25, indicated that the residents will be treated with kindness, respect and in a manner that is at all times free from any form of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, exploitation or mistreatment. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (condition when blood flow to a part of the brain is obstructed leading to death of brain cells), encephalopathy (condition that disrupts the normal functioning of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-05-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the physician for two of two residents (Resident R19 and R182), resulting in significant medication errors due to receiving another resident's medications for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R182). This created actual harm which required a transfer to the emergency department and admission to a telemetry unit (a unit of a hospital where patients receive continuous heart monitoring) for Resident R182. Findings include: Review of facility policy Specific Medication Administration Procedures dated 4/17/25, indicated to review the five Rights of medication administration (right medication, right patient, right dose, right route, right time) three times. Identify the resident using two identification methods before administering medication (e.g., photo plus verbal confirmation of last name, photo and confirmation by family member, etc.) Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for one of two residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility Transfer of Resident to Another Care Community policy dated 4/16/26, indicated the purpose is to promote continuity of care during transfer. Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/21/26, indicated diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), high blood pressure, and fracture (a broken or cracked bone). Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was transferred to the hospital on 5/14/26, and returned to facility on 5/21/26. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nephrostomy (nephrostomy tube is a thin catheter that drains urine from your kidney into a bag) care and services consistent with physician orders for one of two residents reviewed (Residents R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy Ostomy Care dated 4/17/25, indicated: Ostomy care will be provided for residents who a urostomy, colostomy, or ileostomy. To maintain integrity of peristomal skin, monitor conditions of stoma, manage odor and promote residents' self-esteem. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 12/14/25, indicated diagnosis of obstructive uropathy (blockage that makes it difficult or impossible to pee. It may also cause pain.), other toxic encephalopathy (disturbance of the brain), and muscle weakness (when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of job descriptions, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to effectively manage the facility to prevent the elopement of two resident (Residents R1 and R2), which created an immediate jeopardy situation for two of 33 residents.Findings include: The job description for the NHA specified the purpose of the position is to direct the day-to-day operations of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards governing long-term care facilities and to ensure that the highest degree of resident care and services are delivered and maintained. The job description for the DON specified the purpose of the position is to provide nursing management, set resident care standards for all direct care providers and provide completer supervision and management for the nursing department. Based on findings identified in this report, the facility failed to prevent the elopement of two residents (Residents R1 and R2), which placed the residents in Immediate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medical records on each resident are complete and accurately documented for one of four residents (Closed Resident Record CR1).A review of the clinical record indicated that Closed Resident Record CR1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of kidney, major depressive disorder and hypertension (pressure in your blood vessels are too high). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 7/30/25, indicated the diagnoses remained current.A review of Closed Resident Record CR1 nurse progress notes 9/30/25 indicating resident ceased to breath (CTB) on 9/26/25 at 1915.A review of Closed Resident Record CR1 nurse progress notes did not include documentation on 9/26/25. During an interview on 11/12/25, at 12:04 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed the facility failed to make certain that medical records on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision that resulted in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for one of four residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy Elopement Prevention dated 4/17/25, indicated the facility properly assesses residents and plan their care to prevent accidents related to wandering behavior or elopement. Should the resident's behavior warrant elopement prevention measures, a comprehensive elopement prevention plan will be documented as part of the care plan. Staff observations will be noted during the resident's stay and modifications will be made to the care plan and prevention techniques. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, effective October 2024, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status ( BIMS) is a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and maintain records of refrigeration/freezer temperature logs to make certain refrigeration/freezers function properly and failed to properly maintain cleanliness and sanitation of the Kitchen areas (Main Kitchen). Findings include: Review of facility policy Food Safety and Sanitation, dated 4/17/25, indicated that all local, state and federal standards and regulations are followed in order to assure a safe and sanitary food services department. Review of facility policy Cleaning Instructions: Refrigerators, dated 4/17/25, indicated the refrigerators will be washed thoroughly inside and outside with a detergent and followed by a sanitizer at least once weekly, or as needed. Spills and leaks will be cleaned as they are noticed. During an interview on 5/19/25, at 10:00 a.m., Dietary Manager (DM) Employee E16 revealed that the facility kitchen has been under construction since December 2024, and that tasks as spilt between the Skilled Nursing (SNF) Dining room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that equipment was in safe operating condition for three of three crash carts (GRU, Angel Wing, and Buttercup) and one of one AEDs (Automatic External Defibrillators). Findings include: Review of facility policy Emergency Cart dated [DATE], indicated an emergency cart will be appropriately stocked and ready for use when attempting to resuscitate ad resident. The cart will be readily available for use and its inventory maintained. The cart will have a numbered break-away lock on it at all times. The cart is stocked according to the Crash Cart Inventory List and the unbroken numbered lock indicates that all items are present and accounted for. The numbered lock will be checked and recorded daily by the night time supervisor on the Crash Cart Readiness Checks sheet. This sheet will be kept in a binder and on the cart at all times when not in use. On the first of each month the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for two of three residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R35 and R182), and failed to notify the resident or resident's representative of the facility bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) for three of three resident hospital transfers (Residents R25, R35, and R182). Findings include: Review of facility policy Medical Emergency dated 6/3/24, last reviewed 4/17/25, indicated if transfer is required complete transfer form and send appropriate documentation with the resident. Review of facility policy Bed Holds dated 6/3/24, last reviewed 4/17/25, indicated upon transfer out, nursing will provide a copy of the Notice to the resident. Within 24 hours of the transfer, but no more than 48…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required time frame for five of six residents (Residents R11, R22, R28, R73, and R100). Findings include: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that an admission MDS assessment was to be completed no later than 14 calendar days following admission (admission date plus 13 calendar days), and an annual MDS assessment was to be completed no later than the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) plus 14 calendar days. Resident R11 had an annual ARD of 11/6/24, and was due to be completed 11/20/24. The MDS was signed off as completed on 11/22/24, two days after the due date. Resident R22 had an admission date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for three of six residents (Residents R22, R38, and R79). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated the following instructions: - Section N0415: High-Risk Drug Classes: Use and Indication, Question N0415E1 - Anticoagulant (e.g., warfarin, heparin, or low-molecular weight heparin): check if an anticoagulant medication was taken by the resident at any time during the 7-day look-back period (or since admission/entry or reentry if less than 7 day). - Section O0110K1: Hospice care: code residents identified as being in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 61 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents were provided appropriate treatment and care for three of nine residents (Residents R25, R105, and R186). Findings include: Review of facility policy Physician Orders dated 6/3/24, and last reviewed 4/17/25, indicated physician orders are followed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices. The purpose is to ensure that the residents receive all medications and treatments that are ordered by the physician in a timely manner. Review of facility policy Bowel Management dated 4/17/25, indicated the standard regimen for bowel management will be followed for a resident who experiences alteration in bowel elimination. The purpose is to provide regularity of bowel movement and prevent constipation. On the 3rd day without a bowel movement, two tablets of Senna must be administered by mouth. On the 4th day, if Senna is ineffective, give Bisacodyl…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility document, resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide trauma survivors with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for four of four residents (Resident R12, R57, R58, and R116). Findings include: Review of facility job description Social Worker, indicated that the Social Worker will carry out social evaluations and plan interventions based on evaluation findings, and counsel residents/ family/caregivers as needed in relationship to stress and other identified coping difficulties. Ensure compliance with all Federal, State, and local regulations. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R12's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 4/15/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a disorder in which a person has difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications in two of two medications rooms (Angel Wing Medication Room and GRU Medication Room), and two of three medication carts (Angel Wing Back Medication Cart and GRU Back Hall Medication Cart). Findings include: Review of facility policy Storage of Medications dated [DATE], indicated medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. Medications requiring refrigeration are kept in a refrigerator at temperatures between 2°C (36°F) and 8°C (46°F) with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring. The facility shoulder maintain a temperature log in the storage area to record temperatures at least once a day. Drugs dispensed in the manufacturer's original container will be labeled with the manufacturer's expiration date. When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care was provided in a manner which maintained resident dignity for one of four residents (Resident R25). Findings include: Review of facility policy Indwelling Urinary Catheter dated 4/17/25, indicated the catheter bag should have a privacy cover applied at all times unless it has one built in by the manufacturer. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R25's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/5/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and respiratory failure (a condition where the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood). Review of Resident R25's care plan dated 6/19/24, indicated the resident has an indwelling urinary catheter with an intervention of position catheter bag and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate the call bell needs for two of five residents (Residents R35 and R79). Findings include: Review of facility policy Call Lights dated 4/17/25, indicated to assure resident has call light or alternative communication device within reach at all times when unattended. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R35's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/7/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), and need for assistance with personal care. During an observation on 5/19/25, at 10:02 a.m. Resident R35's call bell was observing hanging from the wall unit at the head of the bed, out of the resident's reach. During an interview on 5/19/25, at 10:23 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician order, develop a resident centered care plan, and determine resident safety for the placement of a bed against the wall for two of two residents (Resident R103, and R106). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Physical Restraint dated 4/17/25, indicated each resident is to attain and maintain his/her highest practical well-being in an environment that prohibits the use of restraints for discipline or convenience and limits use of restraints use to circumstances in which the resident has medical symptoms that warrant the use of restraint. The use of restraint will be a last resort alternative intervention. Review of Resident R103's clinical record indicated an admission date of 3/17/25. Review of resident 103's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/8/25, indicated the diagnosis of dementia (a group of symptoms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that that quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required time frame for one of six residents (Resident R73). Findings include: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that quarterly MDS assessments were to be completed no later than 14 calendar days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). Resident R73 had a quarterly ARD of 12/24/24, and was due to be completed 1/7/25. The MDS was signed as completed on 1/15/25, eight days after the due date. During an interview on 5/21/25, at 12:33 p.m. Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator Employee E8 confirmed that the facility failed to make certain that quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans to meet resident care needs for two of three residents (Residents R12 and R22). Findings include: Review of facility policy Comprehensive Care Plan dated 6/3/24, and last reviewed 4/17/25, indicated to allow each individual or individual's representative to make informed choices about accepting or declining care and treatment. The care plan reflects an individual's choices, either as offered by the individual directly or via a valid advance directive, or based on a decision made by the individual's representative in accordance with state law. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R12's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 4/15/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a disorder in which a person has difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a care plan to accurately reflect the current status for one of six residents (Resident R65). Findings include: Review of clinical record indicated Resident R65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs resulting in inflammation inside the airways that limit airflow into and out of the lungs) and asthma. Review of Resident R65's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) assessment, dated 5/5/25, indicated the diagnoses remain current. Review of Resident R65's physician orders dated 3/23/25 Regular, 7EC (Easy to Chew) diet, Allergic to milk and strawberries. Review of Resident R65's Resident Care Plan Summary Report (report nurse aides used to know what kind of care to provide) dated 2/24/25, revealed no allergy. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, job descriptions, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to meet the accepted standards of practice by failing to administer medications to the correct resident for one of five residents (Resident R182). Findings include: Review of facility policy Specific Medication Administration Procedures dated 4/17/25, indicated to review the 5 Rights of medication administration (right medication, right patient, right dose, right route, right time) three times. Identify the resident using two identification methods before administering medication (e.g., photo plus verbal confirmation of last name, photo and confirmation by family member, etc.) Review of the facility Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) job description indicated the LPN administers medications to residents in an accurate, timely manner. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R182 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a resident's interview, clinical record review and review of the facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to provide supervision with meals as ordered for one of three residents (Resident R23). Finding include: Review of the facility policy titled, Physician Orders last reviewed 4/17/25, stated physician orders are followed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices. Review of Resident R23's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (occurs when blood flow to the brain is cut off) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and abnormal posture. Review of Resident R23's physician order dated 8/23/25, revealed the resident requires direct supervision with meals for assistance with feeding. The resident enjoys eating in the dining room. Review of Resident R23's care plan dated 7/29/24, revised 5/15/25, indicated the resident needs assisted with meals but is resistive to others helping him eat. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited mobility receives appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for one of two residents (Residents R116). Findings include: Review of facility policy Restorative Nursing Standard dated 4/17/25, indicated that the facility provides a Restorative Nursing program with interventions that promote the resident's ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible. This concept actively focuses on achieving and maintaining optimal physical, mental, and psychosocial functioning. The Restorative Nursing Coordinator facilitates communication between the interdisciplinary team and manages the Restorative Nursing program. Categories of Restorative Nursing programs include splint or brace assistance. A physician's order is obtained and entered into electronic health record. Document the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with an enteral feeding tube (a tube inserted in the stomach through the abdomen) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent potential complications for one of two residents (R79). Findings include: Review of facility policy Basic Guidelines for Enteral Feeding dated 4/17/25, indicated basic guidelines for enteral feeding will be followed by all staff delivering care to enterally fed individuals. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R79's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/25/25, indicated diagnoses of anemia (too little iron in the blood), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), and muscle weakness. Review of a physician order dated 4/21/25, indicated two times a day for nutrition Jevity 1.5 (a tube feeding formula) via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for one of four residents (Resident R25). Findings include: Review of facility policy Oxygen Therapy via Nasal Cannula dated 4/17/25, indicated to replace cannula every seven days, date and store in plastic bag when not in use. Review of facility policy Small Volume Nebulizer dated 4/17/25, indicated to ensure equipment is dry, not damp, and place in storage bag labeled with resident's name and date equipment was used. Replace equipment every seven days. Date connecting tubing. Replace every seven days. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R25's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/5/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care for one of five residents (Resident R105). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Administering Medications last reviewed 12/9/24, revealed medications are administered vin a safe and timely manner, and as prescribe. If dosage is believed to be inappropriate or excessive for a resident, or a medication has been identified as having potential adverse consequences for the resident or is suspected of being associate with adverse consequences, the person preparing or administering the medication will contact the prescriber, the resident's attending physician or the facility's medical director to discuss the concerns. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses of high blood pressure, phantom limb pain syndrome with pain, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for three out of five nurse aides (NA Employee E13, E14 and E15). Findings include: Review of personnel files reviewed that Nurse Aide Employee E15 start date was 5/28/97, last performance evaluation was completed 10/22-10/23. Review of personnel files revealed that Nurse Aide Employee E13 last hire date was 8/17/20, last performance evaluation was completed 10/22-10/23. Review of personnel files revealed that Nurse Aide Employee E14 last hire date was 7/19/21, last performance evaluation was completed 10/22-10/23. During an interview on 5/21/24, at 12:45 p.m. Human Resources Employee E12 confirmed that the facility does not have up to date performance appraisals completed on NA Employee E13, E14 and E15. 28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(b)(c)(d) Staff development. 28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on a review of four-week cycle menu, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have a registered dietitian review and approve the menu and nutritional substitutes prior to implementation for one out three meals served on 4/25/25 (lunch). Findings include: During an interview on 5/19/25, at 2:18 p.m. Dietary Manager (DM) Employee E16 stated that the facility prepared a special meal on 4/25/25, that was designed to enter a competition amongst sister facilities for a cook-off. DM Employee E16 stated that she then adapted this recipe for Braised Beef Tips to be served to the residents for lunch on 4/25/25. Review of the four-week menu cycle failed to indicate that the lunch meal for 4/25/25, included a signature of approval from a registered dietitian. During an interview on 5/21/25, at 1:20 p.m. Registered Dietitian Employee E17 confirmed that the facility failed to acquired approval for the special menu served on lunch 4/25/25, from a Registered Dietitian prior to serving. 28 Pa Code: 211.6(a) Dietary services.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, resident clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the coordination of hospice services with facility services to meet the needs of each resident for end-of-life care for one of three residents (Resident R38). Findings include: Review of facility policy Hospice Referral dated 4/17/25, indicated that a hospice referral will be initiated in accordance with resident and family wishes. Care will be coordinated with the resident's physician, pharmacy, and responsible party as appropriate. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R38's MDS (MDS-Minimum Data Set assessment: periodic assessment of resident care needs)dated 3/24/25, indicated diagnoses of epilepsy (brain condition that causes reoccurring seizures), diabetes mellitus (metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and major depressive disorder (mental health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely enter an order for isolation for one of nine residents (Resident R68) and have a surveillance plan for tracking, and monitoring residents who tested negative for Influenza during an outbreak for two of ten months (February 2025 to March 2025). Finding include: Review of the Respiratory Virus Outbreak Toolkit dated 11/14/24, indicated a case-line listing is designed to collect information about all ill cases (residents and staff) during an outbreak in a long-term care facility. It was indicated upon identification of an outbreak, use this template to collect and organize information on cases. The type of test ordered and if pathogens were detected must be recorded. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of influenza, anxiety, and depression. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision that resulted in an elopement (leaving an area without permission) for one of 16 residents (Resident R1), and failed to make certain each resident received adequate monitoring of an elopement prevention device for one of 16 residents (Resident R2). Findings include: Review of facility policy Elopement Prevention last reviewed 6/3/24, indicated that the facility will properly assess residents and plan their care to prevent accidents related to wandering behavior or elopement. Should the resident's behavior warrant elopement prevention measures, a comprehensive elopement prevention plan will be documented as part of the care plan. Staff observations will be noted during the resident's stay and modifications will be made to the care plan and prevention techniques. If a Wanderguard (a device applied to the resident that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0575 — isolated
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interview, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to have complete contact information for State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program posted at the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 3/18/25, at 11:32 a.m. Resident R2 asked State Agency for email of the Ombudsman, as it was not listed on the Ombudsman poster in the hallway. During an observation in Buttercup Hallway there was a poster with Ombudsman contact information which only consisted of the phone number, and did not have name, address, or email address listed. During an observation and interview on 3/18/24, at 2:27 p.m. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed post the Ombudsman's name, address, and email address as required. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a)Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(3) Management.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' medical information on one of four units (Geriatric Rehabilitation Unit Back Medication Cart). Findings include: Review of facility policy HIPAA/HITECH Administrative Policy dated 6/3/24, indicated the facility is to protect residents' privacy rights and their individually identifiable health information as required by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information, 45 CRF Parts 160 and 164, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) and all Federal regulations and interpretive guidelines promulgated thereunder. During an observation on 3/18/25, at 2:05: p.m. the Geriatric Rehabilitation Unit Back Medication Cart beside the nurse's station, was left unattended with the computer screen open with identifiable information any passerby could see resident personal and confidential information. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of three residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Care Plan and Interdisciplinary Care Conferences dated 6/3/24, indicated that an individualized, interdisciplinary care plan is initiated within 24 hours for each resident as part of the care delivery process. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed hospital documentation dated 11/6/24, that stated that tracheostomy is present. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/20/24, indicated diagnoses of cancer (uncontrolled growth and spread of abnormal cells), malnutrition (lack of nutrients to the body), and muscle weakness. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 11/15/25, to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain an order for a resident with a tracheostomy (a procedure to help air and oxygen each the lungs by creating an opening into the windpipe from outside the neck), to ensure proper tracheostomy care for one of three residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Tracheostomy Care dated 6/3/24, indicated that tracheostomy care is performed a minimum of one time per shift. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed hospital documentation dated 11/6/24, that stated that tracheostomy is present. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/20/24, indicated diagnoses of cancer (uncontrolled growth and spread of abnormal cells), malnutrition (lack of nutrients to the body), and muscle weakness. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a care plan for two of six residents (Resident R1, R2) to accurately reflect the current status of the resident. Findings include: Review of clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses which included adult failure to thrive, Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia and neurocognitive disorder. A review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a periodic assessment of resident care needs), dated 11/4/24, indicated diagnoses remained current. Review of Resident R2's physician orders dated 12/5/24 indicated Safety Devices:Wanderguard on at all times: Check placement & skin integrity each shift. Change every 84 days was discontinued on 11/4/24. Review of Resident R2's Resident Care Plan Summary Report (report nurse aides used to know what kind of care to provide) dated 8/22/24, indicated elopement risk. Care Plan interventions included wandering device Device # A3423-3494. Review of clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical and facility record review, facility provided documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident resulting in elopement (resident exited to an unsupervised and unauthorized location without staff's knowledge) for one of six resident (Resident R1). Findings include: The facility Resident Elopement policy dated 6/3/24, indicated the facility will properly assess residents and plan their care to prevent accidents related to wandering behavior or elopement. Review of clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses which included encephalopathy, cognitive communication mood disorder and dysphagia. A review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a periodic assessment of resident care needs), dated 11/21/24, indicated diagnoses remained current. Review of Resident R1 nurse progress notes dated 12/18/24 at approximately 1:28 p.m., Nursing home administrator (NHA) notified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for five of seven residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R41, R49, R68, R116, and Closed Resident Record CR134). Findings include: Review of facility policy Medical Emergency dated 6/3/24, indicated if transfer is required complete transfer form and send appropriate documentation with the resident. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R41's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/18/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), and depression (a constant feeling of sadness and loss of interests). Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R41 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a transfer notice to a representative of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Division for five of seven residents (Residents R41, R49, R68, R116, and Closed Resident Record CR134). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R41's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/18/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), and depression (a constant feeling of sadness and loss of interests). Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R41 was transferred to hospital on 2/22/24 and returned to the facility on 3/1/24. Review of Resident R41's clinical record indicated the facility failed to include documented evidence that the facility provided a written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated and revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for four of four residents (Residents R23, R38, R78, and R337). Findings include: Review of facility policy Care Plan and Interdisciplinary Care Conferences dated 6/3/24, indicated the care plan is a working tool that is reviewed and revised at specific intervals and as needed to reflect response to care and changing needs and goals. The purpose of the care plan is to structure and guide therapeutic interventions to meet resident's needs and achieve expected outcomes. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R23's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 6/14/24, indicated diagnoses of dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), repeated falls,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor resident wounds and complete weekly skin assessments for four of four residents (Residents R52, R66, R88, and R96), failed to notify a physician of abnormal glucose readings via a Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) level as per order for one of two residents (Resident R49), and failed to follow physician orders to monitor daily weights for one of three residents (Resident R116). Findings include: Review of the facility Skin Integrity and Wound Management policy dated 6/2/24, indicated the implementation of an individual resident's skin integrity and wound management occurs within the care delivery process. Staff continually observes and monitor residents for changes and implements revisions to the plan of care as needed. It was indicated staff must perform skin inspections on admission and weekly by a licensed nurse and it must be documented in the resident's electronic record. Wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide trauma survivors with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for four of four residents (Resident R50, R67, R68, and R128). Findings include: Review of facility job description Social Worker, indicated that the Social Worker will carry out social evaluations and plan interventions based on evaluation findings, and counsel residents/ family/caregivers as needed in relationship to stress and other identified coping difficulties. Ensure compliance with all Federal, State, and local regulations. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R50's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/17/24, indicated diagnoses of PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder- a mental health condition that is caused by an extremely stressful or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications in two out of three medication carts (Pleasant Valley Back Medication Cart and Buttercup Back Hallway Medication Cart) and one of three medication rooms (Angel Wing Medication Room). Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication Storage in the Facility dated [DATE], indicated medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed from inventory, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal. Drugs dispensed in the manufacturer's original container will carry the manufacturer's expiration date. Once opened, these will be good to use until the manufacturer's expiration date is reached unless the medication Is in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility admission documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident rights to make informed decisions and choices about important aspects of residents' health, safety and welfare by making certain residents understand the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form and failed to ensure the agreement is explained to the resident and his or her representative in a form and manner that he or she understands for one of three residents (Closed Record (CR) Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019 indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment Review of CR Resident R1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' medical information on one of four three units (Pleasant Valley Back Medication Cart). Findings include: Review of facility policy HIPAA/HITECH Administrative Policy dated 6/3/24, indicated the facility is to protect residents' privacy rights and their individually identifiable health information as required by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information, 45 CRF Parts 160 and 164, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) and all Federal regulations and interpretive guidelines promulgated thereunder. During an observation on 8/20/24, at 9:09: a.m. the Pleasant Valley Back Medication Cart outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] was left unattended with the computer screen open with identifiable information any passerby could see resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to assess the functional status of one of two resident (Resident R99) to determine if the use of a seatbelt is a restraint, and failed to develop a care plan for a seatbelt for one of two residents (Resident R2) Findings include: The facility Physical Restraint policy last reviewed 6/3/24, indicated that physical restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restrict freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. The resident must be physically and cognitively able to self-release devices such as Velcro lap trays or tables, seat belts with Velcro, or easy snap seat belts. If a resident cannot mentally and physically self-release, then the device is considered a restraint. The elimination potential of a physical restraint will be re-assessed at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the clinical record and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for one of six residents (Resident R90). Findings include: Review of the facility Activity Protocol policy dated 6/3/24, indicated the activity department will provide resident centered activities in both group and independent leisure setting that promote each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. It was indicated residents will be offered activities daily. Review of Resident R90's clinical record indicated an admission date of 1/13/20, with diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident (also known as a stroke, occurs when blood flow to a part of your brain is stopped either by a blockage or the rupture of a blood vessel), aphasia (disorder that affects how you communicate), and dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities). Review of Resident R90's care plan last revised 4/27/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide colostomy (a surgical process that diverts bowel through an artificial opening in the abdomen wall) care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R76). Findings include: Review of facility policy Ostomy Care dated 6/3/24, indicated ostomy care will be provided for residents who have a colostomy. Ostomy appliances are changed as needed. The purpose is to maintain integrity of peristomal skin (skin around the opening), manage odor, and promote resident ' s self-esteem. Access the color of the stoma (the opening and skin integrity. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R76's MDS (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/28/24, indicated the diagnoses of high blood pressure, depression, and heart failure (a condition that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions of respiratory equipment for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R81). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Oxygen Therapy via Nasal Cannula dated 6/3/24, indicated oxygen therapy via nasal cannula will be administered as ordered by a physician and will include correct flow rate, concentration, mode of delivery, and frequency. Oxygen will be set up, delivered, and monitored by a licensed nurse or a respiratory therapist, as appropriate. Nasal cannula labeled with resident's name and date of initial set up. Replace cannula every seven days, date, and store in plastic bag when not in use. Review of admission record indicated Resident R81 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 6/6/24, indicated the diagnoses of high blood pressure, depression, and cancer (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical records and facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who displayed mental or psychosocial adjustment difficulties received appropriate treatment and services to correct the problem for one of six residents (Resident R84). Findings include: Review of the facility Behavior Standard policy last reviewed 6/3/24, indicated residents with dementia receive person-centered care and their individual needs and preferences are recognized. Review of the facility policy Comprehensive Care Plan-CU8.5 dated 6/3/24, indicated a resident's care plan reflects the individual's goals and choices, and identifies individual specific interventions. Review of the facility's Care Plan and Interdisciplinary Care Conferences- NU 6.1 dated 6/3/24, indicated an individualized, interdisciplinary care plan is initiated within 24 hours for each resident as part of the care delivery process. Review of Resident R7's clinical record indicated the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with dementia receives the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R7). Findings include: Review of the facility Behavior Standard policy last reviewed 6/3/24, indicated residents with dementia receive person-centered care and their individual needs and preferences are recognized. Review of Resident R7's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included high blood pressure, depression, dementia (loss of cognitive function, thinking, remembering, and reasoning). A Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated 5/22/24, indicated the diagnoses were current. Review of Resident R7's care plan dated 5/29/24, failed to include a care plan for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, Quality Assurance attendance records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all of the required committee members for one of one of three quarters (January 2024 through March 2024). Findings include: Review of facility policy Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Structure, Scope and Plan dated 6/3/24, indicated a QAPI Committee shall be established to administer the QAPI Plan as it pertains to that home. Members of the homes' QAPI Committee will consist of at least the following: Nursing Home Administrator, Director of Nursing, Medical Director, Personal Care Administrator, Consultant Pharmacist, Direct Care Team Member, Medical Records representative, Laundry/Housekeeping Director, Maintenance Director, Activities Director, Social Worker, Culinary Director, Human Resources Director, RNAC, at least one member of the Safety Committee, Laboratory representative, Community Member, and Representatives from any Performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly monitor resident's personal refrigerators to ensure that food is properly stored and maintained for three out of three residents (R22, R76, and R110). Findings include: Review of facility policy Food Brought in From Outside Sources dated 6/3/24, indicated it is the policy of the facility to provide safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption of food, including food and fluids brought in from outside sources. - The refrigerators will be maintained at or below 41 degrees. - Freezers will be kept at zero degrees and below. - Facility staff will monitor and document the temperature daily. - Sanitation of the refrigerator will be maintained by facility staff member. - Items brought into the facility must be labeled with the resident ' s name and date it was prepared. During an observation on 8/21/24, at 10:05 a.m. Resident R22 had a small personal refrigerator on his bedside nightstand. During an observation on 8/22/24, at 9:15 a.m. the contents inside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that a pneumococcal immunization was offered to one of five residents (Resident R25). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Standing Orders for Administering Pneumococcal Vaccine to Adults last reviewed 6/3/24, indicated that the pneumococcal vaccination will be offered and documented in the resident's medical chart and personal immunization record card. Review of the admission Record indicated that Resident R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/8/24, included diagnoses of high blood pressure, constipation, and depression. Review of Resident R25's clinical record on 8/21/24, at 9:20 a.m. indicated a consent was required for the pneumovax immunization. During an interview on 8/22/24, at 10:23 a.m. the Infection Preventionist Employee E3 confirmed that the facility failed to make certain that a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to notify a physician of abnormal vital signs for one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility Physician Notification last reviewed 6/1/23, indicated upon identification of a resident who as clinical changes, change in condition, or abnormal lab values, a licensed nurse will perform appropriate clinical observations and data collection and report to physician as indicated. Review of the facility Resident Change in Condition or Status last reviewed 6/1/23, indicated when a residents exhibits a change in condition from their baseline, the licensed nurse assigned to the resident must ensure timely notification to physician. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R1's was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of high blood pressure, anxiety, and atrial fibrillation (abnormal heartbeat). Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that included interventions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: The facility policy Care Plan and Interdisciplinary Care Conferences- NU 6.1 last reviewed 6/1/23, indicated an individualized, interdisciplinary care plan must be initiated within 24 hours. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of high blood pressure, anxiety, and colostomy status (opening (stoma) in the large intestine). Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/3/24, indicated the diagnoses were current. Review of Resident R1's baseline care plan dated 3/2/24, failed to include interventions for the resident's colostomy. During an interview on 4/10/24, at 11:12 a.m. Registered Nurse Supervisor, Employee E3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that appropriate treatments and services were provided for a foley catheter and ostomy as required for one of five residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility Ostomy Care- NU 10.17 policy dated 6/1/23, indicated ostomy care will be provided for residents who have a colostomy. Ostomy appliances are changed and pouches are emptied as needed. It was indicated to change the ostomy appliance, appropriate size and type, and stoma measuring guide is needed. Review of the facility Catheter: Use of NU- 10.11 dated 6/1/23, indicated treatment must be initiated according to the physician's order. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R1's was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of high blood pressure, anxiety, and atrial fibrillation (abnormal heartbeat). A review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility documents, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that a resident with limited bed mobility received services to maintain safety and maintain or improve bed mobility for one of three residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that bed mobility is defined as how resident moves to and from a lying position, turns side or side, and positions body while in bed or alternate sleep furniture. The RAI further indicated that How a resident turns from side to side, in the bed, during incontinence care, is a component of Bed Mobility and should not be considered as part of Toileting. Review of American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine - Caregiver Guide and Instructions for Safe Bed Mobility published 4/28/17, indicated bed mobility refers to activities such as scooting in bed, rolling, side-lying to sitting, and sitting to lying down.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for bed mobility for one of three residents, that resulted in a resident falling out of bed (Resident 1). Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that bed mobility is defined as how resident moves to and from a lying position, turns side or side, and positions body while in bed or alternate sleep furniture. The RAI further indicated that How a resident turns from side to side, in the bed, during incontinence care, is a component of Bed Mobility and should not be considered as part of Toileting. Review of American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine - Caregiver Guide and Instructions for Safe Bed Mobility published 4/28/17, indicated bed mobility refers to activities such as scooting in bed, rolling, side-lying to sitting, and sitting to lying down. Review of Resident R1's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to identify a case of Legionella, evaluate and analyze hazards and risks, and implement interventions to reduce hazards and risks in a timely manner for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record indicated he was admitted [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (a decline in cognitive abilities that impacts a person's ability to perform everyday activities), Legionnaires' disease (a lung infection caused by bacteria Legionella), and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R1's MDS assessment (MDS-Minimum Data Set assessment: periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 9/30/23, indicated that the diagnoses were current upon review. Review of Resident R1's Nurse Hand-Off Report dated 9/26/23, indicated the resident was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of Legionella pneumonia. Review of Resident R1's Discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determine the facility failed to provide privacy and confidentiality of resident healthcare information on three of three residents (Resident R7, R57, R70, and R118). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled HIPPA/HITECH Administrative Policy dated 4/1/15, last reviewed 6/1/23, states the purpose is to protect resident's privacy rights and their individually identifiable health information as required by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA), Standards or Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information, 45 CFR Parts 160 and 164, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH), and all federal regulations and interpretive guidelines. During an observation on 9/11/23, at 10:29 a.m., Resident R57's [NAME] (document with resident healthcare information) was observed taped inside the resident's closet in their room. The resident name, date of birth , age, and care information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans to meet care needs for five of twenty-nine residents (Residents R31, R49, R63, R91, and R100). Findings include: Review of facility policy Care Plan and Interdisciplinary Care Conferences dated 6/1/23, indicated the care plan is a working tool that is reviewed and revised at specific intervals and as needed to reflect response to care and changing needs and goals. The purpose of the care plan is to structure and guide therapeutic interventions to meet resident's needs and achieve expected outcomes. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R31's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 8/23/23, indicated diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a group of progressive lung disorders characterized by increasing breathlessness),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated and revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for three of twenty-nine residents (Residents R21, R108, and R54). Findings include: Review of facility policy Care Plan and Interdisciplinary Care Conferences dated 6/1/23, indicated the care plan is a working tool that is reviewed and revised at specific intervals and as needed to reflect response to care and changing needs and goals. The purpose of the care plan is to structure and guide therapeutic interventions to meet resident's needs and achieve expected outcomes. A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle weakness and neoplasm (abnormal growth of tissues that may or may not be cancerous) of rectum. A review of Resident R54's MDS (MDS-- minimum data assessment: a periodic assessment of resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, personnel files and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for four out of five personnel records (Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E15, Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E16, Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E17, and Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E18). Findings include: The Facility assessment dated 7/2023 indicated that staff general competencies are completed upon hire and annually. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E15's personnel record indicated she was hired on 3/6/08. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E15's job description was signed on 2/8/08. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E15's personnel record did not include an annual performance evaluation. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E16's personnel record indicated she was hired on 8/21/08. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E16's job description was signed on 8/7/08. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E16's personnel record did not include an annual performance evaluation. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E17's personnel record indicated she was re-hired on 4/18/18. Nurse Aide (NA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement infection prevention and control policies for COVID-19 that were current and based on national standards and complete COVID-19 testing as recommended by national standards for two of two residents (Residents R72 and Resident R113). Findings include: Review of the Center for Disease Control and Preventions (CDC) Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic dated 5/8/23, stated the recommendations in this guidance continue to apply after the expiration of the federal COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. It stated the facility must establish a process to identify and manage individuals with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection, implement source control measures, perform COVID viral testing on anyone with even mild symptoms of COVID-19 or asymptomatic residents who has close contact with someone who was positive for COVID-19, and create a process to respond…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical record, investigation documentations, family interview and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect within 24 hours for one out of three sampled residents (Resident R144). Findings include: The facility Resident protection from abuse, neglect, and mistreatment policy dated 6/1/23, indicated that neglect means the failure of the facility, its employees or providers, to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. The Administrator will notify the Pennsylvania Department of Health via electronic reporting system within 24 hours of the incident. Review of Resident R144's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hyperlipidemia(elevated lipid levels within the blood), chronic kidney disease (a loss of kidney function resulting in the swelling of feet, fatigue, high blood pressure and changes in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical record, investigation documentations, family interview and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation involving an allegation of neglect for two out of three sampled residents (Resident R144 and R106). Findings include: The facility Resident protection from abuse, neglect, and mistreatment policy dated 6/1/23, indicated that neglect means the failure of the facility, its employees or providers, to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. All investigations will be conducted thoroughly and will attempt to gather as much factual information as possible. Review of Resident R144's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hyperlipidemia(elevated lipid levels within the blood), chronic kidney disease (a loss of kidney function resulting in the swelling of feet, fatigue, high blood pressure and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that resident assessments were accurate for two of five residents (Residents R63 and R91). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (required assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2019, indicated that Section O: Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs, Question O0100 should have all listed treatments, procedures, and programs performed during the last 14 days checked. The RAI User's Manual, dated October 2019, indicated that Section J1800 was to be coded No (0) or Yes (1) for any falls since admission. The RAI User's Manual, dated October 2019, indicated that Section O0100C (Oxygen Therapy) was to be coded yes if performed while a resident of the facility within the last 14 days. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, record review, and state scope of practice, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for to one of four residents reviewed (Resident R141). Findings include: Review of the facility's Physician Orders-NU 2.18 policy last reviewed 6/1/23, indicated physician orders are followed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and are transcribed out by persons legally authorized to do so. It was indicated all physician orders must be written by the resident's physician, covering physician, or physician extender. Review of the facility's Registered Nurse job description, last reviewed 6/1/23, indicated the purpose of this position is to provide care to the residents to ensure that the highest quality of care is maintained at all times. Review of Resident R141's clinical record indicated an admission of 9/7/23, with diagnosis that included a stage three sacral pressure ulcer, muscle weakness, and dementia (a gradual decline in memory, thinking, behavior and social skills). Review of Resident R141's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications as prescribed by the physician for two of two residents (Resident R48 and R113). Findings include: A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included anemia, gastroduodenitis (an intestinal condition caused by inflammation in the duodenum lining) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (metabolic disorder impacting organ function related to glucose levels in the human body). A review of Resident R48's quarterly MDS assessment(minimum data assessment: a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 8/8/23, indicated the diagnosis remained current. A review of Resident R48's physician orders dated 9/7/23, indicated HumaLOG Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Lispro) Inject as per sliding scale: if 1 - 69 = 0 follow hypoglycemia protocol; 70 - 149 = 0; 150 - 199 = 1; 200 - 249 = 2; 250 - 299 = 3; 300 - 349 = 4; 350 - 399 = 5; 400 -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and records, and a staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer treatment consistent with professional standards of practice by ensuring weekly wound assessments and treatment were completed as ordered for two of five residents reviewed (Resident R79 and R141). Findings: A review of the Skin Integrity and Wound Management policy dated 6/1/23, indicated it is the facility's policy to continually observe and monitor residents for changes and implement revisions to the plan of care as needed. A review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included paraplegia (paralysis of all or part of the trunk, legs, and pelvic organs) and a sacral pressure ulcer. A review of Resident R79's MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 6/16/23, indicated the diagnosis were current. Section M: Skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents who require dialysis (hemodialysis-treatment to filter wastes and water from the blood) receive services, consistent with professional standards of practice for two of three residents (Resident R48 and R18). Findings include: A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included anemia, gastroduodenitis (an intestinal condition caused by inflammation in the duodenum lining) and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A review of Resident R48's quarterly MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set assessment: MDS -a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 8/8/23, indicated the diagnosis remained current. A review of physician orders dated 9/13/23, indicated assess Left arm AV fistula , observed for bruit and thrill (AV fistula: a connection between an artery and a vein used for dialysis. for bruit: a sound of turbulent blood that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$60,109 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $16,350 — penalty dated 2026-06-10
  • $43,759 — penalty dated 2025-11-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to QUALITY LIFE SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TACK, STEVENIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER33%since 03/01/2024
MARKIVICH, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2024
LEONARD, RICHARDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
TACK-BEARDSLEY, SUSANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
TACK-YUREK, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
ENCOVA MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/29/2025
FIRST NATIONAL BANKOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/29/2025
MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANAOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
NEXTIER BANKOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/29/2025
PNC BANK NAOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/29/2025
CARTER, CHRISTINEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
KANIA, TONIAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
LOPICCOLO, BONNIEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
STAFFORD, LISAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
WONG, KEVINIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/29/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$916K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 2%Other / private 33%

This home reported $916K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$303per resident / day
operating cost
$9,210per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$280per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395371. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next