Quality Life Services - Chicora
160 Medical Center Road, Chicora, PA 16025 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 114 certified beds · (724) 445-2000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607, F0609) — most recent Nov 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (69) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $91,936 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-10)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.2% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.6% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 20.1% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.1% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 31.7% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.3% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.0% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 32.8% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.9% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.3% | 68.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 13.3% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.3% | 9.5% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.49 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.39 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.4%CMS range 30.6–55.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.8%CMS range 7.9–18.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 88.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 3.5–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.72 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 99.5 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
69 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 57 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy, employee files, facility documents, staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all nursing staff were educated on abuse/neglect before working in the facility for one of five staff members (LPN, Employee E1) and two of five staff members (LPN, Employee E2 and Registered Nurse, Employee E3) annually. The facility failed to identify incidents of abuse/neglect, and timely report and investigate allegations of abuse/neglect. The facility put other residents at risk for abuse/neglect from Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Employee E1 by allowing the staff member to continue to work after abuse/neglect allegations were made. This failure created an immediate jeopardy situation.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Protection from Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Exploitation review date of 5/19/25, indicated it is the policy of the facility that each of its own and operated homes treat all residents with kindness, respect and in a manner that is at all times free from any form of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of state laws, facility policy and facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to identify and timely report criminal allegations of abuse/neglect to local law enforcement and required agencies to protect residents for one of five staff members Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN, Employee E1). This failure created an immediate jeopardy situation. Findings include: Review of the Older Adult Protective Services Act of 11/6/87, amended by Act 1997-13, Chapter 7, Section 701, requires any employee or administrator of a facility who suspects abuse is mandated to report the abuse. All reports of abuse should be reported to the local area agency on aging and licensing agencies. If the suspected abuse is sexual abuse, serious bodily injury, or suspicious death, the law requires additional reporting to the Department of Aging and local law enforcement. Review of the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP revised 7/23/25, revealed the facility must develop and implement written policies and procedures that ensure reporting of crimes occurring in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for nine of sixteen residents (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, and R9).Findings Include: Interview on 6/26/26, at approximately 12:00 p.m. the Director of Nursing indicated the facility did not have a policy specific to safe, clean, and homelike. During an observation on 6/26/26, at 10:45 a.m. Resident R1's former room had large patches of paint missing with exposed drywall. The floor around the commode in the in-room restroom was damaged with the subfloor visible in spots, potentially causing a fall risk and infection control risk. During an observation on 6/26/26, at 10:49 a.m., the room assigned to Resident R2, R3, R4, and R5 revealed numerous gouges in the floor. Additionally, a wooden closet door had a hole in it, approximately four inches across, with jagged wood present. During an observation on 6/26/26, at 10:49 a.m., the room assigned to Resident R6 and R7 revealed a large section of peeling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision that resulted in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for one of ten residents identified to be elopement risks not who did not reside on a secured unit (Resident R10). This was identified as past non-compliance.Findings include: Based on facility policy Elopement Prevention dated 12/1/25, indicated the facility will properly assess residents and plan their care to prevent accidents related to wandering behavior or elopement. Upon admission, readmission, quarterly and as necessary, nurses will complete a Wandering Risk Assessment. Should the resident's behavior warrant elopement prevention measures, a comprehensive elopement prevention plan will be documented as part of the care plan. Staff observations will be noted during the residents'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, comfortable, and homelike environment by not securing maintenance equipment behind a secured door as required (Dining room outside of the kitchen).Findings Include: Interview on 3/9/26, at 2:00 p.m. the Director of Nursing indicated the facility did not have a policy specific to safe, clean, and homelike. During a facility tour on 3/9/26, at 11:00 a.m. the Resident Dining Room directly outside of the facility kitchen, revealed the following equipment being stored: maintenance equipment and carts, resident hand railings (not attached to the wall), a nail gun, a drill with bits, a case of metal ratchets and pieces, scraping tools, shop vacuum, fans amongst other repair tools. The doors to the dining area were not secured with a lock at the front or side entrances of the room. A sign on the doors to the dining room indicated the room was closed and to keep doors closed when not in use. Interview on 3/9/26, at 1:19 p.m. Project Manager Employee E3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, facility provided documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure a safe environment resulting in a burn for one of three residents (Resident R1).Findings include:Review of facility policy Accidents and Incidents dated 12/1/25, indicated a safe environment will be provided for all residents. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 1/8/26, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care.Review of a change in status note dated 2/16/26, stated, Resident served dinner tray and took her tea to drink and dropped it on herself. Burns noted to Right thigh 27x40 cm (centimeters), left inner thigh 4x3 cm, left outer thigh 12x4.5, r/l (right and left) lower quadrant (abdomen) 19x9 cm, upper abdominal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow droplet precautions for one of four residents in isolation precautions (Resident R2).Findings include: Review of facility provided document Covid Positive Steps dated 12/1/25, indicated the positive resident must have:-An appropriate sign on their door,-The door should remain closed-Vitals every shift while in isolation-Remains in isolation for 10 days-Appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) stationed by their room for staff to utilize. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Base (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/22/25, indicated the diagnoses of high blood pressure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a group of diseases that block airflow and make it hard to breathe), and depression. Review of facility provided documentation dated 3/6/26, indicated Resident R2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure comfortable air temperature levels were provided for one of 34 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) and two of three resident areas (Millers Common Room and Dining Room).Findings Include:Review of the facility policy Extreme Weather dated 12/1/25, indicated excessive cold for lengthy periods of time can negatively impact center operations. Excessive cold poses a severe potential harm to confused exit-seeking residents. Geriatric residents have a greater risk of suffering hypothermia because their bodies do no effectively regulate internal temperatures.During an interview on 1/28/26, at 9:30 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) revealed that on 1/25/26, the boiler (form of heat source) needed reset.Observations conducted on 1/28/26, from 12:15 p.m. to 12:45 p.m. with the Maintenance Director, Employee E2 revealed the following air temperatures:[NAME] Lane Nursing Floor-room [ROOM NUMBER]-68 of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision that resulted in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for one of 17 residents (Resident R1). Findings include:Based on facility policy Elopement Prevention dated 12/1/25, indicated the facility will properly assess residents and plan their care to prevent accidents related to wandering behavior or elopement. Upon admission, readmission, quarterly and as necessary, nurses will complete a Wandering Risk Assessment. Should the resident's behavior warrant elopement prevention measures, a comprehensive elopement prevention plan will be documented as part of the care plan. Staff observations will be noted during the residents' stay and modifications will be made to the care plan and prevention techniques.Review of the clinical record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly maintain sanitary conditions in the walk-in cooler which created the potential for cross contamination in the designated main kitchen. Findings include: During an observation of the main designated kitchen on 12/1/25, at 10:30 a.m. the following was observed: -(2) fans in walk-in cooler- brown debris -ceiling in walk-in cooler-brown debris During an interview on 12/1/25 at 1:30 p.m. Dietary Director Employee E11 confirmed the brown debris in the walk-in cooler. During an interview on 12/2/25 at 10:00 a.m., Dietary Manager Employee E11 confirmed that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions which created the potential for cross contamination. 28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(1) Management.28 Pa. Code: 211.6(c) Dietary services.28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical and facility record review, facility provided documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident resulting in elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised and unauthorized location without staff's knowledge) for one of three residents (Resident R94) and failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure a safe environment resulting in a burn for one of three resident's (Resident R35).Review of the facility policy Accidents and Incidents dated 10/13/25, indicated a safe environment will be promoted for all residents. Review of Resident R35's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R35's Minimum Data Set (MDS-periodic assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated 10/21/25, indicated diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), depressive disorder and hypertension.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0699 — patternProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a trauma survivor with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for three of three residents (Residents R24, R41, and R81).Findings include: Review of facility job description Social Worker, indicated that the Social Worker will carry out social evaluations and plan interventions based on evaluation findings, and counsel residents/family/caregivers as needed in relationship to stress and other identified coping difficulties. Ensure compliance with all Federal, State, and local regulations. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R24 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R24's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 10/28/25, indicated the diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a psychiatric disorder that may occur in persons that have witnessed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 57 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate resident care plans and conduct ongoing accurate assessments to ensure that bedrails were used to meet residents' needs and the risks associated with bedrail usage for three of three residents (Residents R1, R63, and R92).Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/10/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. During an observation on 12/1/25, at 9:58 a.m. bilateral (both sides) side rails were observed on the top of Resident R1's bed. Review of Resident R1's comprehensive care plan failed to include measurable objectives and timetables with specific interventions/services for use of bed rails. Review of the clinical record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluation at least once every 12 months for four of four nurse aide (NA) personnel records (NA Employees E12, E13, E14, and E15). Findings include:Review of NA Employee E12's personnel record indicated a hire date of 7/6/10. Review of NA Employee E12's personnel record failed to include an annual performance evaluation at least once every 12 months as required.Review of NA Employee E13's personnel record indicated a hire date of 2/3/12. Review of NA Employee E13's personnel record failed to include an annual performance evaluation at least once every 12 months as required.Review of NA Employee E14's personnel record indicated a hire date of 3/6/25. Review of NA Employee E14's personnel record failed to include an annual performance evaluation at least once every 12 months as required.Review of NA Employee E15's personnel record indicated a hire date of 1/6/23. Review of NA Employee E15's personnel record failed to include an annual performance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of the Quality Assurance attendance records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all required members for three of three quarters (Quarter one, two, three of 2025).Findings: Review of Quality Assessment and Assurance minutes sign in sheets and attendance records for Quarter One, Two and Three of 2025, failed to reveal the Infection Preventionist was in attendance. During an interview 12/4/25, at 1:30 p.m. Clinical Services Specialist Employee E5 confirmed that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings at least quarterly with all the required committee members for three of three quarterly meetings (Quarter one, two, three of 2025), as required. 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (e)(1)(2)(3)(4) Management.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent cross contamination during a dressing change for one of three residents (Resident R5), failed to ensure that contact precautions were ordered for two of five residents (Residents R36 and R82) and failed to ensure that contact precautions were care planned for one of five residents (Resident R82) Findings include: Review of facility policy Wound Dressing Change dated 10/13/25, indicated all wound care will be performed using medical aseptic (free from contamination) technique, unless otherwise ordered by physician. The purpose is to prevent contamination of the wound bed. Each area must be treated separately. Review of the facility policy Pediculosis (Lice) Care dated 10/13/25, indicated pediculosis is an infestation of the scalp, the hairy parts of the body, or clothing with adult lice, larvae, or nits. It is transmitted by direct contact with an infested person and indirectly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to determine whether it was safe to self-administer medications for one of six residents (Resident R25). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Self-Administration of Medications dated 10/13/25, indicated in order to maintain the residents' high level of independence, resident's who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so if the facility 's interdisciplinary team has determined the practice would be safe for the resident and other resident's of the facility and there is a prescriber's order to self-administer. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R25's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/17/25, indicated the diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of upper lobe, right bronchus or lung, respiratory failure and chronic kidney disease. Observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to identify a scoop mattress (a specialty medical mattress with soft raised foam edges) as a possible restraint, and failed to assess the functional status of the individual resident to determine if the use of a scoop mattress is a restraint for one of three residents (Resident R63).Findings include: Review of facility policy Physical Restraint Policy and Procedure dated 10/13/25, indicated physical restraints are defined as any manual method of physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the elder's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restrict freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident R63's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 9/12/25, indicated diagnoses of anemia (too little…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans to meet resident care needs for one of five residents (Resident R92).Findings include: Review of facility policy Care Plan and Interdisciplinary Care Conferences dated 10/13/25, indicated the care plan is a working tool that is reviewed and revised at specific intervals and as needed to reflect response to care and changing needs and goals. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R92's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 10/23/25, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus (DM, a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD, an inability of the kidneys to filter the blood). Review of a physician order dated 5/6/25, indicated to apply Dexcom G7 Sensor (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical records, facility policy and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide consistent and complete communication with the dialysis (a machine that filters wastes, salts, and fluid from your blood when your kidneys are no longer healthy enough to do this work adequately) center for two of two residents (Residents R13 and R92).Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R92's MDS dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus (DM, a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), and End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD, an inability of the kidneys to filter the blood).Review of a physician order dated 11/5/25, indicated Resident R92 receives dialysis treatment at an outside facility every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Review of Resident R92s clinical record did not include complete communication forms for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications in one of three medication rooms (Memory Lane Medication Room).Findings include:Review of facility policy Storage of Medications dated 10/13/25, indicated certain medications such as multiple dose injectable vials require an expiration date shorter than the manufacturer's expiration date to ensure medication purity and potency. During an observation on 12/4/25, at 9:14 a.m. of the Memory Lane Medication Room Refrigerator revealed two tuberculin multiple dose vial (a substance used in the tuberculin skin test (TST) to diagnose tuberculosis infection) that was opened and not labeled with the date opened as required.During an interview on 12/4/25, at 9:14 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E16 confirmed the above observation and that the facility failed to properly store medication in one of three medication rooms (Memory Lane Medication Room).28 Pa. Code: 201(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code: 211.9(a)(1)(k) Pharmacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility provided documents and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to designate a qualified individual(s) onsite, who is responsible for implementing programs and activities to prevent and control infections during the periods of 10/4/25, through 10/13/25, and 11/16/25, to present.Findings included:During an interview on 12/5/25, at 1:25 p.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, I was the Infection Preventionist and Assistant Director of Nursing for the period of 10/13/25, - 11/16/25, when I became the Interim DON. Prior to my tenure IP Employee E16's last day of work was on 10/4/25.During an interview on 12/5/25, at 12:30 p.m. the DON confirmed that the facility failed to designate a qualified individual(s) onsite, who is responsible for implementing programs and activities to prevent and control infections during the periods of 10/4/25, through 10/13/25, and 11/16/25, to present.28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(1)(e)(1) Management.28 Pa. Code: 201.19(3) Personnel records.28 Pa. Code:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow resident consent for pneumococcal vaccination and failed to administer the vaccination in a timely manner for one of five residents (Resident R65).Findings include:Review of facility policy Standing Orders for Administering Pneumococcal Vaccine to Adults dated 10/13/25, indicated staff will identify adults in need of vaccination with pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV - a vaccine that protects against 23 types of streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria). Record the date the vaccine was administered, the manufacturer and lot number, the vaccine site and route, and the name and title of the person administering the vaccine. If the vaccine was not given, record the reason for non-receipt of the vaccine.Review of the admission record indicated that Resident R65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R65's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 11/6/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0941 — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility education documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for one of five staff members (Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E15).Findings include:Review of NA Employee E15's personnel record indicated a hire date of 1/6/23. Review of NA Employee E15's education documents on 12/3/25, at 12:00 p.m. failed to include evidence of required communication training.Interview on 12/3/25, at 2:30 p.m. the Clinical Services Specialist Employee E5 confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for one of five staff members (NA Employee E15).28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa Code: 201.18 (b)(1) Management.28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(6)(d) Staff development.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-10 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of job descriptions, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to effectively manage and implement the facilities abuse and neglect policy, and failed to report alleged criminal activity of a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E1 to the proper authorities, which created an immediate jeopardy situation for all 95 of 95 residents.Findings include: The job description for the Nursing Home Administrator dated 4/14/24, indicated the NHA is to direct the day-to-day operations of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards governing long-term care facilities and to ensure that the highest degree of resident care and services are delivered and maintained. The position is responsible for establishing and maintaining systems that are effective and efficient. Oversee all departments and department supervisors to ensure the Nursing Home is operating safely and efficiently. Operate the company in accordance with the established policies and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-10 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of job description, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct the minimum 12 hours of nurse aide (NA) training per year for four of four direct care facility staff reviewed (NA Employee E5, E8, E9, and E10). Findings include: Review of the facility Nursing Assistant Job Description indicated the purpose of your job role is to provide direct care to residents, under the supervision of a licensed nurse, in accordance with policies and procedures and report resident needs and concerns to a licensed nurse. Attend all in-service classes as assigned and complete assignments. During an interview on 11/9/2025, at 10:30 a.m. Chief Nursing Officer Employee E7 stated that education is conducted by calendar year running January through December. Review of facility education documents for the year 2024 revealed the following concerns: Review of NA Employee E5's facility provided information failed to include the minimum 12-hour NA annual training. Review of NA Employee E8's facility provided information failed to include the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician was appropriately notified of change in condition for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R4).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Change in Condition or Status dated 5/19/25, revealed it is the policy of the facility promptly addressing all resident changes in condition and managing them in compliance with all applicable standards of care. When a resident exhibits a change in condition from their baseline, the licensed nurse assigned to the resident will do the following: provide any necessary physical assessment to determine underlying cause, review any available diagnoses, request assistance from other staff as necessary, and ensure timely notification to charge nurse, physician, and family. Documentation must be provided in the resident record regarding: any assessment of the resident and findings, all applicable interventions, and all communication. All…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' medication regime was free from unnecessary psychotropic (a mind-altering medication) medication for one of three residents (Resident R8). Findings include: Review of facility Behavior Standard Index policy dated 5/19/25, indicated the purpose is to develop and implement behavioral plans, and medication regimes, in efforts to optimize the functional abilities of residents while monitoring for adverse side effects and improve behaviors. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 8/4/25, indicated diagnoses of dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), anxiety, and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R8's physician order dated 7/14/25 through 10/14/25, indicated to administer Ativan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice when documenting for one of eight residents. (Resident R4).Findings include: Resident R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of anxiety, muscle weakness, and high blood pressure. Review of the clinical record physician order dated 6/3/25, indicated Resident R4 was ordered assist with toileting and hygiene every two hours and as needed. Review of Resident R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 9/4/25, indicated diagnoses of anxiety, muscles weakness, and high blood pressure. Question C0500 BIMS Summary Score revealed Resident R4's score to be 4, severe impairment. Section GG-Functional Abilities-revealed the resident required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting transfers and hygiene. and with sit to stand. Review of Resident R4's late entry progress note effective 10/13/25, entered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident is provided non-pharmacological interventions and an assessment prior to administering as needed pain medications for one of seven residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy Pain Assessment and Management dated 5/19/25, indicated all residents are screened for the presence of pain evaluated periodically for the presence of pain. Observe residents who are cognitively impaired/comatose or who have difficulty communicating for physical signs of pain including: grimaces, frowning, crying, change in behavior, loss of function, decreased activity level, resistance to care, agitation, eating or sleeping poorly to evaluate. Balance interventions for pain management with an adequate response to provide comfort while maintaining functional status and quality of life. Document screening for presence of pain, assessment of pain, interventions and resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions and conduct post fall monitoring for one of four residents (Resident R4).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Change in Condition or Status dated 5/19/25, revealed it is the policy of the facility promptly address all resident changes in condition and to manage them in compliance with all applicable standards of care. When a resident exhibits a change in condition from their baseline, the licensed nurse assigned to the resident will do the following: provide any necessary physical assessment to determine underlying cause, review any available diagnoses, request assistance from other staff as necessary, and ensure timely notification to charge nurse, physician, and family. Documentation must be provided in the resident record regarding: any assessment of the resident and findings, all applicable interventions, and all communication. All documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of significant medication errors for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R6).Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication Administration-General Guidelines reviewed 5/19/25, stated medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by person legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medication do so only after they have been properly oriented to the facility's medication distribution system (procurement, storage, handling, and administration). Five rights- Right resident, right drug, right route and right time, and applied for each medication being administered. A triple check of these 5 rights is recommended at three steps in the process of preparation of a medication for administration: (1) when the medication is selected, (2) when the dose is removed from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-10 · tag F0944 — isolatedConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of job description, facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training to one of five direct care facility staff reviewed (Employee E5).Findings include: Review of the facility Nursing Assistant Job Description indicated the purpose of your job role is to provide direct care to residents, under the supervision of a licensed nurse, in accordance with policies and procedures and report resident needs and concerns to a licensed nurse. Attend all in-service classes as assigned and complete assignments. During an interview on 11/9/2025, at 10:30 a.m. Chief Nursing Officer Employee E7 stated that education is conducted by calendar year running January through December. Review of facility education documents for the year 2024 revealed the following concerns: Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E5's facility provided information did not include training on QAPI. During an interview on 11/9/25, at 10:54 a.m. the Chief Nursing Officer Employee E7 confirmed that the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documents, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to revise a care plan to accurately reflect the current status for one of three residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Care Plan and Interdisciplinary Care Conferences dated 11/8/24, indicated that the purpose of a care plan is to structure and guide therapeutic interventions to meet resident's needs and achieve expected outcomes. The care plan is formally reviewed and completed within 21 days after admission at the Interdisciplinary Care Plan Conference and communicated to appropriate staff. The care plan may be specifically reviewed and updated as the resident's condition changes- for example, but not limited to: medications are added or discontinued Resident returns from the hospital Change in resident's mood, behavior, activities of daily living Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures to ensure a complete and thorough investigation of an allegation of sexual abuse was completed for one of four residents (Resident R1). Review of the facility policy Resident Protection from Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Exploitation last reviewed 11/8/24, indicated Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Sexual abuse is defined as non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident and includes sexual harassment, sexual coercion or sexual assault. Reporting/Response includes but not inclusive to: The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) or Director of Nursing (DON) must be notified immediately. The NHA or DON will notify the PA department of health within 24 hours of the incident and complete an on-line PB-22. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to properly date and store food products, and failed to maintain clean equipment in a manner to prevent foodborne illness in the Main Kitchen. Findings include: Review of facility policy Food Storage dated 11/8/24, and previously dated 7/22/24, indicated all foods should be covered, labeled, and dated. Food should be dated as it is placed on the shelves. Review of facility policy Cleaning and Sanitation dated 11/8/24, and previously dated 7/22/24, indicated that food service staff will maintain the cleanliness and sanitation of the dining and food service areas through compliance with a written, comprehensive cleaning schedule. During an observation in the Baker's Refrigerator on 11/12/24, at 9:55 a.m. three packages of whipped topping were not dated. During an observation in the Stand- Up Freezer on 11/12/24, at 10:00 a.m. three lemon meringue pies were not dated. During an observation in the Walk-in Refrigerator on 11/12/24, at 10:05 a.m. an opened package of sliced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0622 — patternNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for five of six residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R2, R13, R82, R83, and R88). Findings include: Review of facility policy Medical Emergency dated 7/22/24, and last reviewed 11/8/24, indicated if transfer is required complete transfer form and send appropriate documentation with the resident. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 11/4/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, Alzheimer ' s disease (a type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior), and diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time). Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident or resident's representative of the facility bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) for four of six resident hospital transfers or therapeutic leave of absence (Resident R2, R69, R82, and R83). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Notice of Bed Hold Policy at Time of Transfer Due to Hospitalization or Therapeutic Leave indicated that the bed hold policy will be provided to residents at the time of transfer of a resident for hospitalization or therapeutic leave. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 11/4/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, Alzheimer ' s disease (a type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assess a resident for safe smoking for one of two residents (Resident R42), and failed to make certain each resident received adequate monitoring of elopement (leaving an area without permission) prevention devices for three out of three residents (Residents R67, R69, and R72), Findings include: Review of the facility policy Smoking dated 11/8/24, and previously dated 7/22/24, indicated that a Smoking Assessment will be completed upon move-in, quarterly, and as needed if there is a decline in the residents Activities of Daily Living. Review of the facility policy Elopement Prevention dated 11/8/24, and previously reviewed 7/22/24, indicated that if a resident's behavior warrants elopement prevention measures, a comprehensive elopement prevention plan will be documented as part of the plan of care. Staff observations will be noted during the resident's stay and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain a medication room refrigerator containing narcotics was properly locked and that open medications stored in the medication room refrigerator were labeled with a dated upon opening for one of two medication rooms ([NAME] Crossings Medication Room), failed to store medications and treatments for residents properly to prevent cross contamination for two of four medication carts ([NAME] Crossing Medication Cart and Settlers Cart 6), and failed to label medications upon opening and ensure medication was in pharmacy labeled medication bag for two of four medication carts ([NAME] Crossing Medication Cart and Settlers Cart 6). Review of facility Management of Controlled Drugs dated [DATE] last reviewed [DATE], indicated that all controlled substances are stored under double lock separate from other medication. Review of facility Storage of Medications dated [DATE], last reviewed [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly monitor resident's personal refrigerators to ensure that food is properly stored and maintained for two of four residents (Residents R16 and R68), failed to implement infection control practices to prevent cross contamination during a dressing change for one of three residents (Resident R46), failed to review annual infection control policies for ten out of ten years (2014 through 2024), and failed to notify residents or resident representatives of two out of two outbreaks ( COVID and Norovirus (a virus causing nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea)). Review of facility policy Food Brought in from Outside Source dated 7/22/24, last reviewed 11/8/24, indicated the purpose of this policy is to have procedures in place for the safe and sanitary storage, handling and consumption of food including food and fluids purchased through third party vendors and brought in by family members and other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience by failing to provide assistance with meals timely for two of six residents (Resident R35 and R55). Findings include: Review of the facility Dysphagia Protocol policy dated 11/8/24, indicated residents who have swallowing difficulties will receive evaluation and treatment interventions to promote adequate nutrition and hydration. Review of the facility Resident Rights policy dated 11/8/24, indicated residents shall be treated with dignity and respect. Review of Resident R35's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R35's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 9/2/24, indicated diagnoses of depression, malnutrition (lack of sufficient nutrients in the body), and Alzheimer's disease (a type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior). Section…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for one of seven residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set a periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 9/30/24, indicated diagnosis of hyperlipidemia (abnormal levels of fat in the blood), and depression (mood disorder that causes persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Review of Resident R1's clinical record, progress notes dated 9/15/24, indicated, Aide notified writer that resident has scratches on right hip area non open, red raised, white heads on bumps, 3 small, raised patches on abdomen and right front side, yeast infection under left breast bright pink in color non open, odor, right breast small light pink rash starting, writer told aides to clean under breast, dry very well apply anti-fungal cream not powder under breast, apply orange tube barrier cream…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility admission documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident rights to make informed decisions and choices about important aspects of residents' health, safety and welfare by making certain residents understand the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) form and failed to ensure the agreement is explained to the resident and his or her representative in a form and manner that he or she understands for one of three residents (Resident R84). Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019 indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician order and develop a resident centered care plan for the placement of a bed against the wall for one of two residents (Resident R42). Review of the facility policy Physical Restraint dated 7/22/24, last reviewed 11/8/24, indicated each resident is to attain and maintain his/her highest practical well-being in an environment that prohibits the use of restraints for discipline or convenience and limits use of restraints use to circumstances in which the resident has medical symptoms that warrant the use of restraint, the use of restraint will be a last resort alternative intervention. Review of the facility Resident Rights dated 7/22/24, last reviewed 11/8/24, indicated a resident shall be free of restraints. Review of Resident R42's clinical record indicated an admission date of 6/7/24. Review of resident 42's MDS dated [DATE], indicated the diagnosis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services were provided for residents with an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted in the bladder to drain urine) for one of four residents reviewed (Residents R88). Findings include: Review of facility policy Indwelling Urinary Catheter dated 7/22/24, and last reviewed 11/8/24, indicated that an indwelling catheter not medically justifies will be discontinued as soon as clinically warranted. The catheter bag should have a privacy cover applied at all times unless it has one built in by the manufacturer. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R88's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 10/28/24, indicated the diagnosis of anemia (low iron in the blood), hypertension (high blood pressure), and neurogenic bladder (a bladder dysfunction caused by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain ongoing communication with the dialysis (a machine filters wastes, salts, and fluid from your blood when your kidneys are no longer healthy enough to do this work adequately) center for two of three residents reviewed (Resident R57, and R59). Findings include: Review of CMS guidelines, 483.25(1) states the facility assures that each resident receives care and services for the provision of dialysis (a machine filters wastes, salts, and fluid from your blood when your kidneys are no longer healthy enough to do this work adequately) including the ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R57's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 9/6/24, indicated the diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of significant medication errors for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Physician Orders dated 7/22/24, and last reviewed 11/8/24, indicated physician orders are followed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and are transcribed and carried out by persons legally authorized to do so. Medications and treatments will be administered and signed off per physician orders. If dose is missed, take dose as scheduled; do not double dose. Review of Davis's Drug Guide for Nurses, 19th Edition, dated 2024, indicated Mercaptopurine is a medication used to treat Crohn's disease (a long-time disease that causes inflammation and irritation in the digestive tract) by reducing irritation and inflammation in the intestines. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, Quality Assurance attendance records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all of the required committee members for one of three quarters (January 2024 through March 2024). Findings include: Review of facility policy Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Structure, Scope and Plan dated 7/22/24, and last reviewed 11/8/24, indicated a QAPI Committee shall be established to administer the QAPI Plan as it pertains to that home. Members of the homes' QAPI Committee will consist of at least the following: Nursing Home Administrator, Director of Nursing, Medical Director, Personal Care Administrator, Consultant Pharmacist, Direct Care Team Member, Medical Records representative, Laundry/Housekeeping Director, Maintenance Director, Activities Director, Social Worker, Culinary Director, Human Resources Director, RNAC, at least one member of the Safety Committee, Laboratory representative, Community Member, and Representatives from any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0941 — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for one of five staff members (Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E9). Findings include: Review of the facility's Employee Handbook indicated as required by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and in order to maintain the high degree of skill and ability necessary to ensure superior resident care, all employees are required to participate in mandatory or approved meetings, in-service training programs and online courses. Review of NA Employee E9's personnel file indicated a hire date of 3/12/18, and failed to include effective communication training between 11/14/23, and 11/14/24. During an interview on 11/14/24, at 2:00 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for one of five staff members as required. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee. 28 Pa. Code: 201.20(c) Staff Development.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect by not using the safest transfer status for one of two residents (Resident R2). Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Protection From Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Exploitation dated 7/22/24, indicated neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or services providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Neglect occurs when the facility is aware of, or should have been aware of, goods or services that a resident requires but the facility fails to provide that to the resident, that has resulted in or may result in physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision that resulted in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for one of 15 residents (Resident R1), failed to accurately complete assessments and monitor safety device for 15 out of 15 residents, and failed to ensure that residents were transfered safely using the safest transfer status for one of two residents (Resident R2) Findings include: Based on facility policy Elopement Prevention dated 7/22/24, indicated the facility will properly assess residents and plan their care to prevent accidents related to wandering behavior or elopement. Upon admission, readmission, quarterly and as necessary, nurses will complete a Wandering Risk Assessment. Should the resident's behavior warrant elopement prevention measures, a comprehensive elopement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policies, observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean safe homelike environment in one of five shower rooms (Miller's Crossing Nursing Unit Shower room). Findings include: A review of facility Housekeeping Services policy date 2/9/24. indicated that housekeeping service promote a safe and sanitary environment. A review of facility Maintenance Department policy date 2/9/24, indicated that the department conducts on-going monitoring of the facility for areas needing repair. During an observation on 7/19/24, at approximately 10:00 am it was revealed that the shower stall in the Miller's Crossing Nursing Unit shower room contained a brown substance on the back wall, the flooring contained a build up of debris and grime along the baseboard and corners and the facility failed to safely secure the baseboard to prevent possible resident injury. During an interview on 7/19/24, at 10:15 the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the shower stall in Miller's Crossing Nursing Unit had a brown substance along…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect by not providing adequate supervision for one of three residents (Resident R1) resulting in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) from the facility. Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Protection From Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Exploitation dated 2/9/24, indicated neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or services providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Neglect occurs when the facility is aware of, or should have been aware of, goods or services that a resident requires but the facility fails to provide the to the resident, that has resulted in or may result in physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to failed to implement written policies and procedures to ensure a complete and thorough investigation of an incident involving the potential for neglect for one of three residents (Resident R1) resulting in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) from the facility. Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Protection From Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Exploitation dated 2/9/24, indicated neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or services providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Neglect occurs when the facility is aware of, or should have been aware of, goods or services that a resident requires but the facility fails to provide the to the resident, that has resulted in or may result in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) to rule out neglect for one of three residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Protection From Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Exploitation dated 2/9/24, indicated neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or services providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Neglect occurs when the facility is aware of, or should have been aware of, goods or services that a resident requires but the facility fails to provide the to the resident, that has resulted in or may result in physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. All reports of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated and revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs after a resident eloped (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) from the facility for one of three residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Elopement Prevention dated 2/9/24, indicated the facility will properly assess residents and plan their care to prevent accidents related to wandering behavior or elopement. Upon admission, readmission, quarterly and as necessary, nurses will complete a Wandering Risk Assessment. Should the resident's behavior warrant elopement prevention measures, a comprehensive elopement prevention plan will be documented as part of the care plan. Staff observations will be noted during the resident's stay and modifications will be made to the care plan and prevention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision that resulted in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for one of three residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Based on facility policy Elopement Prevention dated 2/9/24, indicated the facility will properly assess residents and plan their care to prevent accidents related to wandering behavior or elopement. Upon admission, readmission, quarterly and as necessary, nurses will complete a Wandering Risk Assessment. Should the resident's behavior warrant elopement prevention measures, a comprehensive elopement prevention plan will be documented as part of the care plan. Staff observations will be noted during the resident's stay and modifications will be made to the care plan and prevention techniques. Review of facility policy Accidents and Incidents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility policy and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the Main Kitchen and one out of four unit refrigerators (Memory Lane) which created the potential for cross contamination and food-bourne illness. Findings include: During an observation on 1/17/24, at 9:30 a.m. it was revealed one ice machine in the main kitchen contained a brown substance inside the machine. Review of work history report dated September 2023-July 2024, it was revealed the ice machine was last serviced 12/18/23. Review of facility policy Unit Nourishment Centers-CU3.17. Dated 1/6/23, indicated that food service staff will rotate stock and remove outdated items. Check the temperatures of the refrigerators/freezers in the units daily, document temperatures, and actions taken for any inappropriate temperatures. During an observation on 1/18/24 at 10:10 a.m. the Memory Lane refrigerator revealed a jar of relish with open date of 4/15 no year or name fuzzy whitish substance growing on top. The freezer revealed two large plastic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, homelike environment for one out of four nursing units (Miller's Crossing). Findings include: The facility Protocol: Value of Appearance policy dated 1/6/23, indicated it is the facility policy to maintain a welcoming, clean, safe, and attractive home-like environment. During a tour of the facility's nursing stations and shower rooms, the following was observed: -At 12:41 p.m. on 1/18/24, during an observation of the nursing station on Miller's Crossing the ceiling tile was observed to be damaged with pieces of the ceiling observed on the floor. -At 12:51 p.m. on 1/18/24, during an observation of the shower room on Miller's Crossing the ceiling was observed to be damaged with a piece of drywall screwed into the ceiling. During an interview on 1/18/24, at 12:52 p.m. Nurse Aide, Employee E1 stated that there was a leak at the Miller's Crossing's nursing station and stated there was a hole in the ceiling in Miller's Crossing shower room that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy and clinical record reviews and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to implement, review, and revise a care plan after a fall for one of six residents (Resident R95). Findings include: A review of the facility policy Care Plan and Interdisciplinary Care Conferences dated 1/6/23, indicated the care plan is a working tool that is reviewed and revised at specific intervals and as needed to reflect response to care and changing needs and goals. It was indicated it's purpose is to structure and guide therapeutic interventions to meet resident's needs and achieve expected. The care plan is reviewed and updated at least quarterly and is based on ongoing assessment and evaluation of resident needs. It may be specifically reviewed and updated as the resident's condition changes. A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (high level of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications as prescribed by the physician for two of two residents (Resident R68 and R71) and failed to complete a Registered Nurse assessment on one of five residents following an injury (Resident R95). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy Accidents and Incidents dated 1/6/23, indicates when a resident incident/accident occurs the resident will be assessed by a Registered Nurse (RN). Review of an undated Registered Nurse (RN) job description titled Registered Nurse Position Responsibilities indicated it is the RN's duty to ensure accurate documentation of all incidents/occurrences during the shift. Assist in assessing physical, mental psychosocial status of all residents. A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (metabolic disorder impacting organ function related to glucose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that appropriate treatments and services were provided for the removal of a urinary catheter as required for one of five residents (Resident R51). Findings include: Review of the facility Cather: Use of-NU 10.11 policy dated 1/6/23, indicated in select situations, the use of an indwelling catheter (hollow tube inserted through the urethra or suprapubically into the bladder to drain urine) may be appropriate. This method of continence management will be provided when medically indicated by a physician order. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, obstructive uropathy (blockage of urinary flow), and anemia (deficiency of healthy red blood cells in blood). A review of Resident R51's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-22 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide colostomy care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R17). Findings include: Review of facility policy Ostomy Care dated 1/6/23, indicated that supplies needed for ostomy (an artificial opening in an organ of the body, created during an operation) care included ostomy appliance, with appropriate size and type, and drainage pouch. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Residents R17's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 12/21/23, indicated the diagnoses of COPD, (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease- a group of progressive lung disorders characterized by increasing breathlessness), high blood pressure and muscle weakness. Section H0100 indicated Resident R17 had an ostomy while a resident.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for one of three residents (Residents R58). Findings include: Review of facility policy Oxygen Concentrator dated 1/6/23, indicated that water bottles used for oxygen concentrators should be labeled and dated, and changed weekly. Review of facility policy Oxygen Therapy Via Nasal Cannula, dated 1/6/23, indicated that nasal canula (a lightweight tube placed in the nostrils to deliver oxygen) should be labeled with resident's name and date. Nasal cannula should be replaced every seven days, dated, and store in plastic bag when not in use. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Residents R58's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 10/10/23, indicated the diagnoses of respiratory failure (not enough oxygen in the blood), COPD, (chronic obstructive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies, information provided by the facility, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff report an allegation of abuse per the facility's policy for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 28). This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance.Findings include:The facility's policy regarding protection from abuse, undated, indicated that it is the policy of Quality Life Services that each of its owned and operated nursing homes treat all residents with kindness, respect, and in a manner that is at all times free from any form of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. To protect the residents, each home will implement procedures in the areas of screening, training, prevention, identification, investigation, protection, reporting/response, and corrective action. The following procedure will be implemented by the homes when an incident of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown source), unethical behavior, neglect, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident ' s care plan was updated and revised to reflect the resident ' s specific care needs after a resident refused elopement interventions, for one of two residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Elopement Prevention last reviewed 1/6/23, indicated that should a resident ' s behavior warrant elopement prevention measures, a comprehensive elopement prevention plan will be documented as part of the care plan. Staff observations will be noted during the resident ' s stay and modifications will be made to the care plan and prevention techniques. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 8/16/23, indicated diagnoses of Huntington's disease (an inherited condition in which nerve cells…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision that resulted in an elopement for one of two residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy Elopement Prevention last reviewed 1/6/23, indicated that should a resident ' s behavior warrant elopement prevention measures, a comprehensive elopement prevention plan will be documented as part of the care plan. Staff observations will be noted during the resident ' s stay and modifications will be made to the care plan and prevention techniques. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 8/16/23, indicated diagnoses of Huntington's disease (an inherited condition in which nerve cells in the brain break down over time resulting in progressive movement,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-12-05 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post complete contact information for State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program and complete contact information for State Survey Agency at the facility as required.Findings include: During observations completed on 12/4/25, State Long-Term Care Ombudsman information posted in the front hallway did not include the Ombudsman's email as required. This observation also revealed that the State Survey Agency (SSA) information posted in the front hallway did not include the SSA's address and email as required. During an interview on 12/4/25, at 11:40 a.m. the Clinical Service Specialist Employee E5 confirmed that the facility failed to post complete contact information for State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program and completed contact information for State Survey Agency as required. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a)Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code: 201.18(e) Management.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$91,936 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $91,936 — penalty dated 2025-11-10
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to QUALITY LIFE SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUGAR CREEK REST, INC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/01/2024 |
| TACK FAMILY VENTURES LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/01/2024 |
| MARY SUSAN TACK-YUREK IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/01/2024 |
| STEVEN D TACK IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/01/2024 |
| SUSAN TACK BEARDSLEY IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/01/2024 |
| TACK-YUREK, MARY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2024 |
| LOPICCOLO, BONNIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
| KING, EAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
| MARKIVICH, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2024 |
| TACK, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2024 |
| FIRST NATIONAL INSURANCE AGENCY | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/08/2025 |
| CARTER, CHRISTINE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
| KANIA, TONIA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
| MOSES, ROBERT | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $997K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395118. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.