No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Quality Life Services - Sarver

126 Iron Bridge Road, Sarver, PA 16055 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 66 certified beds · (724) 353-1531 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (724) 353-1531 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2025
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
252 Buffalo Plz Route 356 · (724) 295-0066 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Pharmacy3.2 mi
100 Buffalo Plaza
Grocery
100 Buffalo Plz · (724) 294-2882 · Call to confirm hours
Park
154 Monroe Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
100 Iron Bridge Rd · (724) 353-2220

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.8%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.5%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.4%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.0%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.7%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.1%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.9%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.6%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.4%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.4%17.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.0%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.6%68.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission9.5%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.1%9.5%12.0%worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.9%CMS range 39.7–64.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.4–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified72.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge57.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.1%CMS range 4.6–15.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.941.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.86
RN hours/ resident / day
0.76
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.55
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.77
RN hoursweekends
70.6%
Total nursing turnover
81.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 63.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-14)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors for three of five residents (Resident R4, R5, and R9).Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication Administration dated 8/12/25, indicated that medications will be administered in accordance with written orders of licensed physicians, manufacturer's specifications, and professional standards of practice. A medication error occurs when a resident receives a medication at an incorrect time, does not receive a medication which was ordered. A locked Emergency Medication Kit is maintained by Quality Pharmacy and is kept in a designated medication room in the facility. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R4's was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS - mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated 1/5/26, included diagnoses of anxiety,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-14 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to designate a consistent qualified individual(s) onsite, who is responsible for implementing programs and activities to prevent and control infections for 12 out of 14 months. Findings included: Review of facility Infection Prevention Program policy dated 10/13/25, indicated the infection program is comprehensive in that it addresses detection, prevention, and control of infections among residents and personnel. During entrance meeting on 11/12/25, at 9:30 a.m. Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was identified as the facilities Infection Preventionist (IP). During a review of the facilities Infection Control Program on 11/13/25, the ADON/IP Employee E10 stated, I just started in this role. I completed my infection control training but couldn't take a test and I couldn't print a certificate. During a review of IP certificates reveal the facility failed to have a certified IP on the following dates: - September 2024 - 6/26/25 - 7/26/25 - 8/19/25 - 10/11/25 - 11/13/25 On 11/13/25 the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience by failing to provide assistance with meals timely for one of six residents (Resident R42).Findings include: Review of the facility Activities of Daily Living policy dated 10/13/25, indicated a program of activities of daily (ADL) living is provided for residents. A program of assistance in ADL skills is implemented. Residents are encouraged to eat in the group dining room, when possible, for socialization. Review of the facility Your rights and Protections as a Nursing Home Resident policy dated 10/13/25, indicated a resident has the right to be treated with dignity and respect. Review of Resident R42's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R42's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 9/2/24, indicated diagnoses of Huntington's Disease (a condition that leads to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to make certain a resident had an updated, person-centered care plan individualized to each specific resident's needs for one of five residents (Resident R39).Findings included: Review of the facility Resource: Audit to Assess Quality Care Provided policy dated 10/13/25, indicated care plans are modified when indicated. Care plan revision includes identification of changes in the individual's condition that require revised goals and care approaches. Review of Resident R39 clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R39's clinical record MDS (minimum data set a periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 9/25/25, indicated diagnosis of high blood pressure, coronary artery disease (damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels), and unsteadiness on feet. Review of Resident R39's care plan initiated on 3/25/25, indicated resident transfers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify physicians of increased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels for one of three residents reviewed (Residents R31), and failed to make certain that residents were provided appropriate treatment and care by failing to obtain an X-ray in an appropriate timeframe for one of four residents (Resident Closed Record (CR) R100). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Physician Notification dated 10/13/25, indicated upon identification of a resident who has clinical changes, change in condition, or abnormal lab values, a licensed nurse will perform appropriate clinical observations and data collection and report to physician as indicated. Review of facility policy Your Rights and Protections as a Nursing Home Resident policy dated 10/13/25, indicated residents have the right to be treated with dignity and respect. You have the right to get proper medical care. Review of the admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, incident reports, facility documents, employee education, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from a preventable accident during a transfer for one of four residents (Resident R39).Findings include: Review of the facility Accidents and Incidents policy dated 10/13/25, indicated that the facility will promote a safe environment for all residents. An accident or incident is any happening, which is not consistent with routine operations or the routine care of the particular resident. Review of Resident R39 clinical record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R39's clinical record MDS (minimum data set a periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 9/25/25, indicated diagnosis of high blood pressure, coronary artery disease (damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels), and unsteadiness on feet. Review of Resident R39's care plan dated 3/25/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure direct care staff were aware of residents with fluid restriction orders to make certain acceptable parameters of nutritional status were maintained for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R27).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Fluid Restriction dated 10/13/25, indicated when a physician orders a fluid restriction due to specific clinical condition, close monitoring will be provided to maintain adequate hydration. The water pitcher is to be removed from the bedside. Dietary will determine desired beverages at meals and the remaining amount of fluids to be provided by nursing. Calculate amount allotted for each shift.Review of the admission record indicated Resident R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of anemia (the blood doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells), End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD - kidneys cease to function on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications in one of two medication rooms (Liberty Medication Room) and one of three medication carts (Market Place Medication Cart).Findings include:Review of facility policy Medication Storage in the Facility dated 8/18/25, indicated certain medications such as multiple dose vials, ophthalmic solutions, require an expiration date shorter than the manufacturer's expiration date to insure medication purity and potency. During an observation on 11/12/25, at 11:45 a.m. of the Liberty Medication Room Refrigerator revealed a tuberculin multiple dose vial (a substance used in the tuberculin skin test (TST) to diagnose tuberculosis infection) that was opened and not labeled with the date opened as required.Interview on 11/12/25, at 11:46 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E1 confirmed the tuberculin multiple dose vial was opened and not labeled with the date opened as required.During an observation on 11/12/25, at 12:20 p.m. of the Market Place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions for one of two residents (Resident R25) with an indwelling foley catheter.Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions for one of two residents (Resident R25) with an indwelling foley catheter.Findings include:Review of the facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 10/13/25, indicated enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) are used and expand the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to donning (putting on) of the gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfers of multi-drug-resistant organisms to staff hands and clothing. Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring EBP includes device care or use (central lines, urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that influenza immunization and pneumococcal immunization were offered to one of five residents (Residents R31).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Standing Orders for Administering Influenza Vaccine to Adults dated 10/13/25, indicated to reduce morbidity and mortality from influenza by vaccinating all adults who meet the criteria established by the Centers for Disease Control and Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.Review of the facility policy Standing Orders for Administering Pneumococcal Vaccine to Adults dated 10/13/25, indicated to reduce morbidity and mortality from pneumococcal disease by vaccinating all adults who meet the criteria established by the Centers for Disease Control and Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.Review of the admission record indicated Resident R31 admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident R31's Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that equipment was in safe operating condition for the facilities Automated External Defibrillator (AED-a portable, electronic device designed to diagnose and treat life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias) and crash cart (a supply cart used in an emergency).Findings include: Review of facility AED policy dated 10/13/25, indicated the AED will be available for use in emergency situations and its function maintained according to manufacturer recommendations. Daily maintenance includes checking the indicator to ensure that it is green (AED is ready for rescue). Perform maintenance to the AED monthly. During an observation of the facilities AED box on 11/12/25, at 12:05 p.m. revealed an AED with electrodes attached to the machine were present. An extra set of electrodes were in the AED box. The facility failed to provide documentation for the daily and monthly checks to ensure the AED is in working order. During an observation of the facilities crash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0941 — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility education documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for one of five staff members (Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E3).Findings include:Review of facility provided documents and training records for NA Employee E3 on 11/14/25, indicated that NA Employee E3 was hired to the facility on 7/12/17, and failed to include education on effective communication as required.Interview on 11/14/25, at 1:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for one of five staff members (NA Employee E3). 28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa Code: 201.18 (b)(1) Management.28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(6)(d) Staff development.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, documents, resident medical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to identify and determine the root cause of a physical injury as the potential for abuse or neglect for one of 59 residents. (Resident R1) Findings include: A review of facility Resident Protection from Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Exploitation policy dated 11/21/24, revealed that serious physical injuries are to be reported to the state agency, investigated and PB 22s completed for each alleged perpetrator. A review of the facility's documents revealed that on 2/16/25, Resident R1 sustained a serious physical injury while being transferred from her bed to a wheelchair. While pivoting during the transfer procedure the resident heard and felt a loud crack in her right shoulder. Due to the resident's increased pain and edema to her right hand the facility obtain a physician order for an xray. The xray revealed a displaced 2.2 X 1.3 centimeter avulsion fracture of the lateral aspect of the humeral head in the right shoulder. Resident R1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, documents, resident medical records and staff interviews, it was detrmined that the facility failed to implement an abuse and neglect policy to properly investigation of a physical injury or unknown origin for one of 59 residents (Resident R1). Finding include: During a review of facility Resident Protection from Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Exploitation date 11/21/24, it was revealed that the facility is to implement and complete an investigation for serious physical injury that has resulted in pain, and impairs physical functioning temporally or permanently. The results of the investigation including reports and PB22s must be completed with in five working days. During a review Resident R1's progress notes it was revealed that on 2/16/25, the resident sustained a serious physical injury of unknown origin resulting from transfer procedures from her bed to a wheelchair. While pivoting during the transfer procedure the resident heard and felt a loud crack in her shoulder resulting in pain and edema of her right hand. A hospital emergency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, investigation documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report injuries of unknown source for three of three residents (Resident R1, R2, and R3) reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Protection from Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Exploitation, dated 11/21/24, indicated that nursing homes treat all residents with kindness, respect and in a manner that is at all times free from any form of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, exploitation or mistreatment. To protect our resident, each home will implement procedures in the areas of screening, training, prevention, identification, investigation, protection, reporting/response and corrective action. All reports of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property will be investigated and documented. The Administrator or Director of Nursing will notify the PA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, resident grievances for 60 days, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to effectively resolve and provide responses to residents and/or their responsible parties in a timely manner in relation to concerns documented via Grievance procedure and complete the reports in their entirety for one of three grievances reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy Communication of Resident, Family and Staff Concerns and Grievances dated 8/17/23, indicated to encourage residents, family members and staff to ask questions and express their concerns will maximize their quality of care and promote higher levels of staff and customer satisfaction through timely responses to questions and resolution of issues concerns and grievances. Once we receive a grievance, we will make every effort to respond as quickly and effectively as we can with the goal of always providing outstanding customer service. Our goal is to resolve all concerns within five days of the report with all parties in agreement of the resolution, If the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a physician of abnormal glucose levels as per physician's order for two out of five residents (Residents R20 and R33). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Physician Notification dated 12/1/23, indicated upon identification of a resident who has clinical changes, change in condition, or abnormal lab values, a licensed nurse will perform appropriate clinical observations and data collection and report to physician as indicated. Review of the facility policy Hypoglycemia Protocol dated 12/1/23, indicated for hypoglycemia (a blood glucose less than or equal to 70 mg/dl (milligrams/deciliter), and hyperglycemia a more common side effect, should recheck the blood sugar and notify the physician. Review of Resident R33's admission record indicated an admission date of 5/9/23, with diagnoses of renal insufficiency (condition where the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, facility provided documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a potential allegation of abuse/neglect for misappropriation of property for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R37). Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Protection From Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Exploitation dated 12/1/23, indicated misappropriation of resident property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. Abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property and exploitation will be identified through various methods including reports from employed or contracted staff. All reports of abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of resident property will be investigated and documented. All investigations will be conducted thoroughly and will attempt to gather as much factual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for three of seven residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R28, R34, and R40). Review of facility policy Medical Emergency dated 12/1/23, indicated if transfer is required, complete transfer form and send appropriate documentation with the resident. Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R28's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 6/25/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood), and pain in left hip. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R28 was transferred to hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R28's clinical record revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a transfer notice to a representative of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Division for five of five residents (Residents R20, R28, R34, R40, and R67). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R28's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 6/25/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood), and pain in left hip. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R28 was transferred to hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R28's clinical record indicated the facility failed to include documented evidence that the facility provided a written transportation notification to the Office of Long-Term Care Ombudsman for the hospitalization on 12/12/23. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident or resident's representative of the facility bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed upon rate during a hospitalization) for five of five resident hospital transfers (Residents R20, R28, R34, R40, and R67). Review of facility policy Bed Holds dated 12/1/23, indicated upon transfer out, nursing will provide a copy of the Notice to the resident. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R28's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 6/25/24, indicated diagnoses of high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood), and pain in left hip. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R28 was transferred to hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R28's clinical record failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to update a care plan for one of eight residents (Resident R123) to accurately reflect the current status of the resident. Findings include: Review of clinical record indicated Resident R123 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), hypertension and hypercholesterolemia (high amounts of cholesterol in the blood). Review of Resident R123's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) assessment, dated 9/25/24, indicated the diagnoses remain current. Review of Resident R123's physician orders dated 9/17/24 indicated a 1800 milliliter (ml) fluid restriction. Review of Resident R123's Resident Care Plan Summary Report (report nurse aides used to know what kind of care to provide) dated 9/17/24, revealed no fluid restriction. During an interview on 9/26/24, at 1:30 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident interview and observations, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for one of five residents observed (Resident R39). Findings include: The facility policy Activities of Daily dated 12/1/23, indicated a program of ADL's (eating, dressing, hygiene, elimination, and ambulation) will be provided to prevent disability and maintain resident's functional abilities. A program of assistance and instruction in ADL skills is implemented. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R39's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/22/24, indicated the diagnoses of high blood pressure, dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), and legally blind. Section B1000 Vision - severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services for one of two residents receiving intravenous therapy (Resident R34) and failed to monitor resident wounds and complete weekly skin assessments for two of five residents (Residents R37 and R52). Review of facility policy Midline Dressing Changes dated 12/1/23, indicated midline catheter (a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into a large vein in the upper arm, used to safely administer medication into the bloodstream) dressings will be changed at specified intervals, or when needed, to prevent catheter-related infections associated with contaminated, loosened or soiled catheter-site dressings. Change midline catheter dressing 24 hours after catheter insertion, every 5-7 days, or if it is wet, dirty, not intact, or compromised in any way. Label with initials, date and time. Review of facility policy Overview of IV Therapy dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly assess pressure ulcers for two of three residents (Residents R2 and R60). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Skin Integrity and Wound Management - NU17 dated 12/1/23, indicated perform wound assessment and complete proper forms upon initial identification of altered skin integrity, weekly, and with any deterioration of the wound. Review of Resident R2's admission record indicated admission to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 7/23/24, indicated diagnoses of dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), and depression. Review of Resident R2's clinical progress note Weekly Skin and Wound Note dated 9/10/24, indicated a pressure related wound to sacrum/coccyx/anal area was found acquired in-house on 7/10/14; Current measurements indicated length 1.0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services were provided for two of two residents (Residents R25 and R34) with an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted in the bladder to drain urine). Review of facility policy Indwelling Urinary Catheter dated 12/1/23, indicated the catheter bag should have a privacy cover applied at all times unless it has one built in by the manufacturer. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R25's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 6/25/24, indicated diagnoses of obstructive uropathy (structural hindrance of normal urine flow), heart failure (heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), and high blood pressure. Section H indicated an indwelling catheter was present. Review of Resident R25's current physician orders indicated a Coude catheter (a type of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for three of four residents (Residents R33, R34, and R40). Review of facility policy Oxygen Therapy via Nasal Cannula dated 12/1/23, indicated to replace cannula every seven days, date and store in plastic bag when not in use. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R33's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 9/5/24, indicated diagnoses of renal insufficiency (condition where the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids), heart failure (heart doesn ' t pump blood as well as it should), and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R33's current physician orders indicated change nasal cannula and protective covers weekly. Every night shift every Tuesday, for prevention. CPAP (a continuous positive airway pressure machine used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have accurate physician's orders for two of four residents with assist rails (Residents R25 and R26) and conduct ongoing accurate assessments for one of three residents (Resident R33). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Side Rail Evaluation NU16.55 dated 12/1/23, indicated the side rail evaluation will be completed upon admission, re-admission, or significant change. The facility will obtain a physician order for the side rail. The facility will develop a plan of care for the side rail use. Resident R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 6/25/24, indicated diagnoses of obstructive uropathy (structural hindrance of normal urine flow), heart failure (heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R25's physician orders on 9/26/24, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, controlled drug shift count record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement pharmacy procedures for the reconciliation of controlled drugs for one of two medication carts (Pennsylvania Medication Cart). Findings include: Review of facility policy Management of Controlled Drugs dated 12/1/23, indicated to destroy the drug with another licensed staff member as witness. Staff member designated as witness to the destruction must actually witness the waste. Document the reason for the destruction on the controlled drug inventory in the space for that dose. Signature of person who poured and destroyed the drug and signature of witness must be entered in the space with the documentation of the destruction. Perform a complete count of all controlled drugs at the change of shifts or at any time in which narcotic keys are surrendered from one staff member to another. Count must be performed by two licensed nurses per state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and documentation, clinical record reviews, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to accurately document education and immunization administration related to pneumococcal vaccines for one of five residents (Resident R26). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Standing Orders for Administering Pneumococcal Vaccine to Adults dated 12/1/23, indicated identify adults in need of vaccination with pneumococcal vaccine. Screen all patients for contraindications to pneumococcal vaccine. Provide all patients with a copy of the most current federal Vaccine Information Statement (VIS). Administer the vaccination per order and record in the medical record the date, the manufacturer and lot number, the site and route, and the name of person administering it. Resident R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 8/23/24, indicated diagnoses of heart failure (heart doesn't pump…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to update a care plan for one of four residents (Resident R1) to accurately reflect the current status of the resident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Comprehensive Care Plan dated 12/1/23, indicated an interdisciplinary plan of care will be established for every resident and updated in accordance with state and federal regulatory requirements and on as needed basis with changes. Review of the facility policy Elopement Prevention dated 12/1/23, indicated should the resident's behavior warrant elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) prevention measures, a comprehensive elopement prevention plan will be documented as part of the care plan. Staff observations will be noted during the resident's stay and modifications will be made to the care plan and prevention techniques. Review of the admission record indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision that resulted in one elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy Elopement Prevention dated 12/1/23, indicated the receptionist will maintain the list of all residents at risk for elopement, including name and room number. This list will be distributed to the management team of the care community with staff members who may be in contact with those residents. Departments include nursing, therapeutic recreation, housekeeping, and maintenance. Review of the facility's policy Accidents and Incidents dated 12/1/23, indicated the purpose of the policy is to promote a safe environment for all residents. Review of the admission record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-09 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, personnel files and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete required training on dementia management, communication, and behavioral interventions for five out of five nurse aide personnel files (Nurse aide- NA Employee E1, NA Employee E2, NA Employee E3, NA Employee E4, and NA Employee E5). Findings include: The facility assessment dated [DATE], indicated that staff competencies are necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population. Annual mandatory education consist of test to determine competency. Education is formal and informal and includes dementia management, communication and behavioral interventions. Review of Nurse aide Employee E1's personnel record on 11/8/23, at 11:30 a.m. did not include an annual in-service training on dementia, communication, or behavioral interventions. Review of Nurse aide Employee E2's personnel record on 11/8/23, at 11:32 a.m. did not include an annual in-service training on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, resident observations and interviews, clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain a physician order for use of and cleaning of a Bi-PAP/CPAP machine (machines used to make breathing easier), failed to develop a plan of care for two of three resident (Resident R25 and R212), and failed to properly date respiratory equipment and administer at the appropriate rate of flow for one of three residents (Resident R214). Findings include: Review of the policy CPAP/BIPAP dated 8/17/23, indicated CPAP/BIPAP will be initiated by physician order. To clean the CPAP system: -CPAP, Mask and Whisper Swivel, PRN for soiling: -unplug the unit. Do not immerse unit in liquid or allow liquid to enter the unit, -using a cloth slightly dampened with water and mild dish detergent, wipe the outside of the CPAP case, -let the CPAP dry before reconnecting to power source, -gently wash the mask/swivel in a solution of warm water and a mild soap or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct accurate assessments to ensure that bed rails were used to meet residents' needs and the risks associated with bed rail usage for two of three residents (Resident R5, and R42). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Side Rail Evaluation dated 8/17/23, indicated the following evaluation will be initiated to determine the appropriateness of the use of side rails. The purpose is to determine the least restrictive device to be used to promote the highest level of functionality and to identify and risk factors involved with its use. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 10/2/23, indicated diagnoses of Multiple Sclerosis (MS - the immune system eats away at protective covering of nerve cells), chronic obstructive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement measures to care for huber needles (a specially designed hollow needle used with a med port (a surgically placed intravenous access and the needle has a long, beveled tip that can go through your skin as well as the silicone septum of the implanted port's reservoir) for two of two residents (Residents R13 and R214). Findings include: Review of facility policy Catheter Insertion and Care dated 8/17/23, indicated only specially designed non-coring (utilized to gain access to infusion port) safety needles are to be used when accessing an implanted port. These needles are to be changed every five to seven days or upon suspicion of contamination. For daily maintenance use SASH (Saline-administration-saline-heparin) one pre-filled 10 ml (milliliter) barrel size syringe containing 5ml normal saline, one pre-filled 10ml barrel size syringe of heparin (a blood thinner) 100units/ml. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to QUALITY LIFE SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SUGAR CREEK REST, INCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2024
TACK, STEVENIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL33%since 11/01/2024
TACK-BEARDSLEY, SUSANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL33%since 11/01/2024
MARKIVICH, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2024
SHOOP, REBECCAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
TACK-YUREK, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2024
MARY SUSAN TACK-YUREK IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
STEVEN D TACK IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
SUSAN TACK BEARDSLEY IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
HOLSINGER PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
ADAMS, ANDREWIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
CARTER, CHRISTINEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
KANIA, TONIAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
LOPICCOLO, BONNIEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
STAFFORD, LISAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$698K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 4%Other / private 37%

This home reported $698K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$361per resident / day
operating cost
$10,965per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$297per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395534. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next