Quality Life Services - Westmont
787 Goucher Street, Johnstown, PA 15905 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 41 certified beds · (814) 255-5539 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.0% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.4% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 22.5% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.0% | 17.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 34.4% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.4% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.7% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.8% | 68.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.5% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 22.5% | 9.5% | 12.0% | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.1%CMS range 35.1–60.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.0–17.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 73.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 3.9–13.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.81 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 41 beds and averages 37.3 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.14 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative, in writing regarding the reason for transfer to the hospital eight of 22 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 4, 5, 7, 17, 18, 32, 41). Findings include:A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated January 30, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for all daily care needs, and had a diagnosis that included respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) pneumonia.Nursing notes for Resident 3, dated January 5, 2026, at 5:37 a.m., revealed that the resident was admitted to the local hospital with the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (a clot in a vein).Nursing notes for Resident 3, dated January 23, 2026, at 12:35 p.m., revealed that the resident was coughing with her meal, unable to tolerate nectar thick liquids and respirations were even unlabored. Physician's orders for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were provided as ordered by the physician for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 18).Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 18, dated January 22, 2026, revealed that the resident is cognitively intact, requires assistance from staff for daily care needs, and has medical diagnosis that includes heart failure and high blood pressure. Physician's orders for Resident 18 dated January 20, 2026, included an order for the resident to receive 12.5 milligrams of Carvedilol two times a day and to hold if systolic blood pressure is less than 100 mmHg; if heart rate is less than 60 beats per minute; and call physician if systolic blood pressure is greater than 170 mmHg. A review of Resident 18's Medication Administration Record (MAR's)for January and February 2026 indicated that the residents blood pressure on January 23 was 186/73 mmHg, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and medication package inserts, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label one bottle of eye drops with the opened date, in one of two medication carts reviewed (B cart), failed to label two vials of tuber sol (a solution injected into the body to detect tuberculosis) with the opened date, in one of one medication room refrigerator reviewed, and failed to discard expired medical supplies in one of one medication rooms reviewed. Findings include:The facility's policy regarding medication labeling and storage, dated [DATE], revealed that multi-dose medications that have been opened or accessed are to be dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open medication.Observations of the B medication cart on [DATE], at 09:24 a.m. revealed one bottle of Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution .005 percent eye drops that were opened and not dated with the date they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper infection control practices were followed while providing medications for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 25).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated November 11, 2025, indicated that staff were to ensure that medications were administered as prescribed in accordance with nursing principles and practice while maximizing independence and choice by utilizing resident centered care policies.Observations during medication administration on March 11, 2026, at 6:47 a.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 1 prepared to administer medications to Resident 25 and obtained Fish Oil and Senna/Docusate from stock medication bottles (medication used for multiple residents). The nurse touched the capsules of Fish Oil and Senna/Docusate with her bare hands and placed the capsules into the cup of medications. She then picked up a pill that had fallen on the top of the medication cart,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to follow physician's orders to provide medications as ordered by the physician for two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 24, 25) and failing to obtain a physician's order for fortified foods and health shakes for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 14). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 24, dated January 15, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and required maximum assistance from staff for her daily care needs. Physician's orders for Resident 24, dated December 28, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 25 milligrams (mg) of Metoprolol (high blood pressure medication) daily and to hold the medication if the systolic (top number) blood pressure was less than 120 millimeters of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the physician, resulting in significant medication errors for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 32). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated April 8, 2024, indicated that facility was to administer medications to residents in a safe manner that correlated with their daily activity and natural schedules. The facility's policy regarding physician's orders, dated April 8, 2024, revealed that physician's orders were to be followed in accordance with good nursing principles and practice and were to be transcribed and carried out by the persons legally authorized to do so. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 32, dated January 3, 2024, indicated that the resident was alert and oriented, received insulin, and had diagnoses that included diabetes. Physician's orders for Resident 32, dated January 2,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was served under sanitary conditions. Findings include: Observations in the main kitchen on February 18, 2025, at 9:01 a.m.; February 19, 2025, at 11:15 a.m.; and on February 20, 2025, at 8:51 a.m. revealed that there was an accumulation of dust and food debris, a clear drinking glass, a small red bowl, and a [NAME] Cup (a lightweight, easy-to-grip adapted drinking cup designed to prevent spills) under and behind the ice machine, and there was an accumulation of dust and food debris under the stove. Interview with the Dietary Manager on February 20, 2025, at 8:58 a.m. confirmed that there was an accumulation of dust and food debris, a clear a drinking glass, small red bowl, and a [NAME] Cup under and behind the ice machine, and an accumulation of dust and food debris under the stove. 28 Pa. Code 211.6(f) Dietary Services.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending April 3, 2024, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending February 20, 2025, identified repeated deficiencies related to accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs), development of comprehensive care plans, quality of care, preventing issues with the accountability of controlled medications (drugs with the potential to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from verbal abuse for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 19). This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated April 8, 2024, revealed that it is the policy of the facility to treat all residents with kindness, respect, and in a manner that is at all times free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, exploitation, or mistreatment. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 19, dated October 29, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, exhibited no behaviors, was frequently incontinent of bladder, and always continent of bowel. Resident 19 had diagnoses that included a psychotic disorder (a group of mental health conditions characterized by a loss of touch with reality, leading to distorted perceptions, thoughts,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, investigation documents, and the Department of Health's Event Reporting System (ERS), as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff reported allegations of verbal abuse in a timely manner for two of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 19, 136). This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated April 8, 2024, revealed that to protect the residents, the facility will implement procedures in the areas of screening, training, prevention, identification, investigation, protection, reporting/response, and corrective action. The following procedure will be implemented by the facility when an incident of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment including injuries of an unknown source, or misappropriation of resident property, and resident abuse, alleged or suspected. This includes allegations involving other residents, visitors, employees, or any other person. Any situation of abuse or suspected abuse will be reported as follows. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for three of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 14, 24, 32). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides guidance and instructions for the completion of MDS assessments, dated October 2024, indicated that the intent of Section N was to record the number of days, during the seven-day assessment period, that any type of injection, insulin, and/or select medications were received by the resident. Section N0415A was to be coded if the resident received an antipsychotic medication during the seven-day assessment period, and Section N0451K was to be coded if the resident received an anticonvulsant medication during the seven-day assessment period. Physician's orders for Resident 14, dated January 16, 2021, included an order for the resident to receive 100 milligrams (mg) of gabapentin (anticonvulsant medication)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident-centered care plans were developed and implemented for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 6) who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for having a surgically implanted drain. Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated February 5, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for daily care tasks. Physician's orders for Resident 6, dated May 16, 2024, included an order that the resident may not be showered due to his surgically implanted percutaneous drain (gallbladder drain). Physician's order, dated June 12, 2024, included an order for the staff to flush the gallbladder drain vigorously daily. Observations of Resident 6 on February 18, 2024, at 10:08 a.m. revealed that the resident had a sign on his door indicating that he was on EBP and had personal protective equipment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor a resident's weight as recommended by the dietician for one of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 14). This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding weights, dated April 8, 2024, revealed that if a weight is obtained and a five-pound weight loss or gain has occurred for individuals weighing greater than 100 pounds or a three-pound weight loss or gain occurred for individuals weighing less than 100 pounds, then a re-weight should be obtained within 24 hours of the first obtained weight. Staff were to ensure the individual was weighed on the same scale as previously used, and when the re-weight was obtained the weight should be documented in the medical record, stating that it was a re-weight and the previous weight should be struck out. All residents with a significant weight change would be assessed and referred to the dietitian for assessment. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate accounting of controlled medications (medications with the potential to be abused) for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 33). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 33, dated December 23, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, and had a diagnosis of anxiety. A care plan for the resident, dated October 14, 2024, revealed that the resident uses anti-anxiety medications related to an anxiety disorder, and staff was to administer the anti-anxiety medications to the resident as ordered by the physician. Physician's orders for Resident 33, dated December 20, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive a one milligram (mg) tablet of Clonazepam (a narcotic medication used to prevent and treat anxiety disorders) every eight hours as needed. Resident 33's controlled drug logs for January and February…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that non-pharmacological (non-medication) interventions were attempted prior to the administration of anti-anxiety medications for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 33). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 33, dated December 23, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, and had a diagnosis which included anxiety. A care plan for the resident, dated October 14, 2024, revealed that the resident uses anti-anxiety medications related to an anxiety disorder, and staff was to administer the anti-anxiety medications to the resident as ordered by the physician and that staff should attempt non-pharmacological interventions (e.g., massage, music, quiet time, reading, watching TV, etc.) before the resident is offered the as needed psychotropic medication (medications that affect the mind and behavior). Physician's orders for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for three of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 4, 12). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plan development and revision, dated October 12, 2023, indicated that resident care plans are reviewed and updated at least quarterly and as a resident's condition changes (such as when medications are added or discontinued, resident returns from the hospital, and with changes in mood, behaviors or care needs). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (required assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated February 2, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included heart failure, high blood pressure, and dementia. A care plan for Resident 1, dated March 22, 2023, revealed that the resident had oxygen related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for medications were followed for three of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 1, 4, 12). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding physician's orders, dated October 12, 2023, revealed that physician's orders were to be followed in accordance with good nursing principles and practice and were to be transcribed and carried out by the persons legally authorized to do so. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (required assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated February 2, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included heart failure, high blood pressure, and dementia. Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated May 9, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 60 milligrams (mg) of isosorbide mononitrate (a medication for high blood pressure) one time a day and to hold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for three of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 30, 31). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated October 12, 2023, indicated that medications administered will be documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). For as needed medications, the nurse will document initials and time of administration on the MAR. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (required assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated February 2, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs, and had diagnosis that included heart failure, high blood pressure, and dementia. Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated December 28, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 50 milligrams of Tramadol (a controlled medication used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment related to the cleanliness of wheelchairs for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 18). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 18, dated February 14, 2024, indicated that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for his daily care needs, had impairment on one side of the upper and lower extremities, and used a wheelchair. Observations on April 1, 2024, at 3:32 p.m. and April 3, 2024, at 11:05 a.m. revealed that Resident 18's wheelchair had a dried, brown/tan, removable substance on the metal bars of the chair. Interview with Nurse Aides 1 and 2 on April 3, 2024, at 11:07 a.m. confirmed that the chair had a dried, brown/tan, removable substance on the wheelchair that needed cleaned. Housekeeping and nursing staff were responsible for cleaning wheelchairs as needed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a professional licensure verification with the Pennsylvania State Board of Nursing prior to hire for one of four employees reviewed (Licensed Practical Nurse 3). Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated October 12, 2023, indicated that the facility developed and implemented personnel and other policies to ensure that all staff are qualified and meet all regulatory standards for hire. The facility's screening procedures included conducting reference checks of previous and present employers, criminal background checks on potential employees as well as contracted personnel, verification of nursing licenses with the State Board of Nursing, and verification of nurse aide standing with the state Nurse Aide Registry. The personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse 3 revealed that she was hired on January 4, 2024, and as of April 2, 2024, (four months after hire) a professional licensure verification with the Pennsylvania State Board of Nursing had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policies and clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop individualized care plans that included resident-centered interventions for two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 23, 30). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plan development, dated October 12, 2023, indicated that an individualized, interdisciplinary care plan is initiated within 24 hours of admission based on available resident-specific information related to resident assessments, interviews, previous medical records, identified goals, and physician's orders. The care plan is formally reviewed and completed within 21 days after admission. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 23, dated March 6, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for his daily care needs, and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Interview with Resident 23's wife (the resident's representative) on April 2,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, clinical records, and facility investigation reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that assistance devices to prevent accidents or injury were in place as care planned for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 12) who was at risk for falls. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding managing falls and fall risks, dated December 21, 2022, indicated that in conjunction with the attending physician, staff will identify and implement relevant interventions to try to minimize serious consequences of falling. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 12, dated March 18, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs, used supplemental oxygen, and had diagnoses that included heart failure, respiratory failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease). A care plan for Resident 12, dated January 15, 2024, revealed that the resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policies and clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician's order was obtained to provide oxygen therapy for two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 12, 30). Findings include: The facility's policy for oxygen administration, dated October 12, 2023, revealed that oxygen therapy via nasal cannula will be administered as ordered by a physician and will include correct flow rate, concentration, mode of delivery, and frequency. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 12, dated March 18, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs, used supplemental oxygen, and had diagnoses that included heart failure, respiratory failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease). A review of physician's orders for Resident 12 revealed that there was no order for the resident to receive oxygen therapy. A care plan for Resident 12, dated June…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free from significant medication errors for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 12). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding physician's orders, dated October 12, 2023, revealed that physician's orders are to be followed in accordance with good nursing principles and practice and are to be transcribed and carried out by the persons legally authorized to do so. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 12, dated March 18, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for her daily care needs, used supplemental oxygen, and had diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus. Physician's orders for Resident 12, dated May 1, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 5 units of insulin Novolog (used to lower blood sugar levels) before meals and to hold if Accucheck is 150 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) or less.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to discard two expired multi-dose insulin vials in one of one medication carts reviewed (B Hall), and failed to securely store medication in one of one medication carts reviewed (B Hall). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding administering medications, dated [DATE], indicated that during medication administration the medication cart will be locked if it is not clearly within view. No medications will be left unattended on top of the medication cart. Observations of a medication pass on [DATE], at 8:52 a.m. revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 5 left a card of Januvia (a medication used to help lower blood sugar) 25 milligrams (mg) tablets on top of the medication cart unsupervised while she entered a resident's room to administer medication. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 5 at that time confirmed that she should not have left the medication on top of the cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by not discarding an opened, expired food item. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food storage, dated October 12, 2023, revealed that all staff must provide the date a food or beverage item is opened with a date marked to indicate the date by which the food item should be consumed or discarded. Foods with a manufacturer use-by date must be used or discarded by the stamped date. Observations in the small kitchen refrigerator on April 1, 2024, at 8:43 a.m. revealed an opened container of Miracle Whip salad dressing with a resident's name on it and an opened date of September 2023. No use-by date was indicated on the jar and the container had a stamped expiration date of January 2024. Interview with the Dietary Manager, at the time of observation, confirmed that the opened container of Miracle Whip salad dressing was expired and should have been discarded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct and/or maintain compliance with quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) for the surveys ending May 18, 2023; August 21, 2023; and October 12, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending April 3, 2024, identified repeated deficiencies related to comprehensive care plans, care plan timing and revision, quality of care, safe environment/supervision, respiratory care, pharmacy services, labeling and storage of drugs/biologicals, and food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident's representative was notified of changes in condition and new physician's orders for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding communication of health status/notification of family, dated October 12, 2023, indicated that the facility was to notify the resident and/or the resident's family/responsible party of any changes in resident's condition, including new physician orders or changes in current orders. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated November 9, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff with daily care tasks, had an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder through the urethra or suprapubically to allow for urine drainage), and had diagnoses that included acute cystitis (infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, clinical records, and investigative reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete thorough investigations of incidents to rule out neglect and/or abuse for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility's policy for protection from abuse, neglect or exploitation, dated March 2, 2023, indicated that all reports of injuries of unknown source will be investigated. All investigations will be conducted thoroughly and will attempt to gather as much factual information as possible. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (mandated to assess the resident abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated September 7, 2023, revealed that he was alert and able to make his needs known; required extensive assistance of one for hygiene, eating, and bed mobility; used oxygen; and had a tracheostomy (a tube that is placed into a surgical opening made in the neck and into the trachea to breathe through). The plan of care for Resident 2, dated May 3, 2023, indicated that he agreed on a method…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in care needs for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings include: The facility's policy for care plan and interdisciplinary care conferences, dated March 2, 2023, indicated that an individualized care plan is a working tool and that it was to be reviewed and revised at specific intervals and as needed to reflect response to care and changing needs and goals. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (mandated to assess the resident abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated September 7, 2023, revealed that he was alert, able to make his needs known; required extensive assistance of one for hygiene, eating, and bed mobility; used oxygen; and had a tracheostomy (a tube that is surgically placed in the neck and into the trachea that the resident breathes through). The resident's plan of care, dated May 11, 2023, indicated that staff were to monitor him for any risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician was notified about a significant change in condition for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2), resulting in a delay in treatment. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding physician notification, dated March 2, 2023, revealed that upon identification of a resident who has clinical changes, change in condition, or abnormal lab values, a licensed nurse will perform appropriate clinical observations and data collection and report to the physician as indicated. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and are needs) for Resident 2, dated July 20, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, had behaviors, required extensive assistance with daily care needs, including transfers and ambulation (walking), had a history of falls, and had diagnoses that included dementia. A nursing note, dated July 26, 2023, at 8:58 p.m. revealed that Resident 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to QUALITY LIFE SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| LOPICCOLO, BONNIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/05/2025 |
| MARKIVICH, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 11/01/2024 |
| CARTER, CHRISTINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| RECKNER, EMILY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| STAFFORD, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| TACK, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2024 |
| TACK-BEARDSLEY, SUSAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2024 |
| TACK-YUREK, MARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2024 |
| ENCOVA MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/05/2026 |
| FIRST NATIONAL INSURANCE AGENCY | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/05/2026 |
| HOLSINGER PC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| MARY SUSAN TACK-YUREK IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/05/2026 |
| STEVEN D TACK IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/05/2026 |
| SUGAR CREEK REST, INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/05/2026 |
| SUSAN TACK BEARDSLEY IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/05/2026 |
| TACK FAMILY VENTURES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/05/2026 |
| WESTMONT WOODS, LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| GRAY, PATRICK | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| KANIA, TONIA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $510K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 396132. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.