No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Quality Life Services - Sugar Creek

120 Lakeside Drive, Worthington, PA 16262 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 114 certified beds · (724) 445-3146 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2025Resident-funds citation (F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$246,480 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $246,480 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-05)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
882 E Brady Rd · (724) 548-5605 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
164 Medical Center Rd · (724) 445-3027 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1650 Route 422 E · (724) 712-0427 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
474 500 T362

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.3%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.9%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.2%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.6%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication30.1%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.1%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.4%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.7%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.4%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.5%68.7%79.4%better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.1%CMS range 30.9–54.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.7–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge75.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge80.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.701.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
0.96
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
43.6%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 108.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-05)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2026-03-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical literature review, clinical record reviews, review of facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an altered texture diet, as prescribed by the physician, for one of 40 residents (Resident R1). This failure resulted in Resident R1 choking on food that he was not ordered which caused him to cease to breathe. This failure placed an additional 40 residents that had similar diet needs at risk which resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for 40 of 107 residents.Findings include: Review of facility policy Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) Diets dated 2/16/26, indicated the following: Individuals with observed indicators of dysphagia (coughing, choking, delayed swallow, pocketing of food [storing food in cheeks, gums, without swallowing], inability to manipulate food in the mouth, wet gurgly voice, etc.) will be referred to the Speech Therapist (ST) for evaluation of dysphagia.The ST will evaluate the resident. Once a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, Pennsylvania Department of Health (PADOH) guidance, facility policy and documents, review of clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program by failing to timely investigate and document surveillance, exclude ill staff from working, failed to educate staff on appropriate precautions related to GI illness, and failed to implement preventative measures to address an outbreak of gastrointestinal illness among residents for 10 of 17 residents (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, CR8, R9, and R14) The facility's failure created a situation in which all 100 of 100 residents were placed in Immediate Jeopardy related to a lack of proper infection control procedures. Findings: The CDC, Guideline for the Prevention and Control of Norovirus Gastroenteritis Outbreaks in Healthcare Settings, dated 2/15/17, indicated that healthcare settings that experience an outbreak of gastroenteritis/norovirus should implement the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure foods were not held in the danger zone temperatures which are between 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 135 degree F and properly store food products.Findings: Review of the facility's Food Storage policy dated 2/12/26, revealed sufficient storage facilities are provided to keep foods safe, wholesome, and appetizing. Food is dated as it is placed on the shelves, and old stock is always used first. Date marking to indicate the date by which a ready-to-eat, potentially hazardous food should confused or discarded will be visible on all high risk food. Foods with a manufacturer use by date, must be used or discarded by the stamped date. During tray line observation of the main designated kitchen on 6/3/26, at 11:20 a.m. the following was observed:-The tomato soup was held at 89F. During an interview on 6/3/26, at 11:21 a.m. Dietary Aide, Employee E9 confirmed the tomato soup was being held at 89F. During an interview on 6/3/26, at 11:22 a.m. Director of Dietary,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement person-centered comprehensive care plans to meet resident care needs for three of five residents (Resident R10, R17, and R98). Findings include: Review of facility policy Behavior Monitoring dated 2/16/26, indicated the licensed nursing staff will observe resident behaviors and provide documentation regarding: what behaviors are observed and the number of episodes that occur each shift, what non-pharmacological interventions are initiated to prevent or respond to the behaviors, and the effectiveness of the non-pharmacological interventions utilized. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R10's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/22/26, indicated diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD – a disorder in which a person has difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-05 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — pattern
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, job descriptions, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient and timely social services for three of four residents reviewed (Residents R10, R15, and R17). Findings include: Review of the Social Work Director job description indicated the purpose of this position is to coordinate internal and external social services counseling and education services. Review of the Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP/CRNP) job description indicated the PMHNP provides comprehensive mental health care needs to residents across the care continuum. The CRNP (Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner) will assess, diagnose, and manage psychiatric and mental health conditions using evidence-based treatment modalities including psychotherapy and psychopharmacology. Key responsibilities include provide psychotherapy or supportive counseling as appropriate. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R10 was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence medication regimen reviews (MRRs) were reviewed by the resident's attending physician monthly for three of five residents (Residents R8, R56, and R98).Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication Regimen Review dated 2/16/26, indicated the consultant pharmacist performs a comprehensive review of each resident's medication regimen (MRR) at least monthly. The MRR includes evaluating the resident's response to medication therapy to determine that the resident maintains the highest practicable level of functioning and prevents or minimizes adverse consequences related to medication therapy. Findings and recommendations are reported to the director of nursing and the attending physician, and if appropriate, the medication director and/or the administrator. Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff or the prescriber. Physician accepts and acts…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' medication regime was free from unnecessary psychotropic (a mind-altering medication) medication for two of three residents (Resident R9 and R15). Findings include: Review of facility Antipsychotic Medication Consent Form policy dated 2/16/26, indicated it is the philosophy of this home that in cooperation with our elders, we will create and maintain an environment that fosters the minimal use of antipsychotic medications. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of resident needs) dated 4/13/26, indicated diagnoses of Anxiety disorder ( group of mental health conditions that cause fear, dread, and other symptoms that are out of proportion to the situation) Depression (mood disorder that causes persistent feeling of sadness and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, staff interviews, and observations it was determined that the facility failed to provide supervision with meals as ordered for one of three residents (Resident R6). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Restorative Nursing dated 2/16/26, indicated restorative care is an ongoing process, provided by all staff at all times for resident. Formal Restorative Nursing Programs will be initiated for residents who demonstrate a need for this service. Review of the facility policy Physician Orders dated 2/16/26, indicated physician orders are followed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and are transcribed and carried out by persons legally authorized to do so. Review of the facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADL) dated 2/16/26, indicated a program of ADL is provided for residents. A program of assistance is implemented. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, staff and resident interview, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for one of five residents (R8).Findings Include: Review of the RESmart CPAP and Auto-CPAP User Manual dated 8/3/16, revealed it is recommended that the air filter be changed every 30 days. Remove the filter cap by gently pressing on its bottom. Remove the foam filter by gently pulling around the edges of the filter. Remove filter and replace with blue side facing out. Replace filter cap so that the small opening on the cap is facing down. Insert the cap's tabs into the filter area opening. Opering a RESmart CPAP and Auto-CPAP with a dirty filter may keep the system from working properly and may cause damage to the device. Review of the facility CPAP/BIPAP policy dated 2/12/26, revealed the CPAP will be set up and monitored by a licensed nurse or respiratory therapist, as appropriate. Review of the clinical record indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with dementia receives the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R15), and failed to develop and implement individualized person-centered care plans to address dementia and cognitive loss displayed by one of three residents reviewed (Resident R98). Findings include: Review of facility policy Behavior Monitoring dated 2/16/26, indicated the licensed nursing staff will observe resident behaviors and provide documentation regarding: what behaviors are observed and the number of episodes that occur each shift, what non-pharmacological interventions are initiated to prevent or respond to the behaviors, and the effectiveness of the non-pharmacological interventions utilized. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R15 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly secure a treatment cart while not in use for one of three treatment carts (Willow Hall Treatment Cart).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Administering Medications last reviewed 1/6 /26, indicated during administration of medications, the medication cart will be kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse. When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened shall be recorded on the container. Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications last reviewed 1/6/26, indicated the nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Compartments containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use. Medications must be stored separately from food and must be labeled accordingly. During an observation completed on 6/3/26, at 12:59 p.m. the [NAME] treatment cart was sitting in the hallway near the nursing station. The treatment cart was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans to meet resident nutrition care needs for five of six residents reviewed (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5).Findings include: Review of the International Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) Framework, revised July 2019, provides definitions to describe texture modified foods and thickened liquids used for individuals with dysphagia, which include the following descriptions: Level 7 Easy to Chew foods must be able to break food apart easily with the side of a fork or spoon. To make sure the food is soft enough, press down on the fork until the thumbnail blanches to white, then lift the fork to see that the food is completely squashed and does not regain its shape.Level 5 Minced and Moist meats should be finely minced or chopped. Serve in mildly, moderately or extremely thick, smooth, sauce or gravy, draining excess. Use slot between fork…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' medical information on one of four nursing units (Willow Nursing Unit).Findings include: Review of facility policy HIPAA/HITECH Administrative Policy dated 2/16/26, indicated the facility is to protect residents' privacy rights and their individually identifiable health information as required by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information, 45 CRF Parts 160 and 164, the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) and all Federal regulations and interpretive guidelines promulgated thereunder. During an observation on 3/4/26, at 2:01 p.m. the [NAME] Medication Cart at the nurses' station was left unattended with the computer screen open with identifiable information any passerby could see resident personal and confidential information. During an observation at 3/4/26, at 2:02 p.m. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of job descriptions, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to effectively manage the facility when the facility failed to provide an altered texture diet, as prescribed by the physician, for one of 40 residents (Resident R1). This failure resulted in Resident R1 choking on food that he was not ordered which caused him to cease to breathe. This failure placed an additional 40 residents that had similar diet needs at risk, and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for 40 of 107 residents. Findings include: The job description for the NHA specified the purpose of the position is to direct the day-to-day operations of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards governing long-term care facilities and to ensure that the highest degree of resident care and services are delivered and maintained. The job description for the DON specified the purpose of the position is to provide nursing management, set resident care standards for all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly maintain cleanliness and sanitation of the Main Kitchen. (Main Kitchen). Findings include: Review of facility policy Food Safety and Sanitation, dated 3/17/25, indicated that all local, state and federal standards and regulations are followed in order to assure a safe and sanitary food services department. During an observation of the main designated kitchen on 5/15/25, at 11:35 a.m. the following was observed: - Wall behind Cook's preparation area, build-up of food spillage/brown debris - Wall behind Robocoupe (food processor)/blender area, build-up of food spillage/brown debris - Wall behind garbage can located next to steamer, build-up of food spillage/brown debris During an interview conducted 5/15/25, at 11:36 a.m., Registered Dietitian (RD) Employee E13 confirmed that the facility failed to properly maintain cleanliness and sanitation of the Main Kitchen. (Main Kitchen). 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-16 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with their quarterly banking statements for three of five residents. Findings include: During a group interview on 5/14/25, at 10:45 a.m. residents indicated that they did not get quarterly statements from the facility for their monies that the facility receives. Residents indicated that they were not aware they were to receive quarterly statements for their monies. During a review of residents quarterly statements the following was noted: Resident R500: resident fund statement indicated that the responsible party of the resident received the resident fund quarterly statement for the period of 1/1/25, thru 3/31/25. Resident R501: resident fund statement indicated that the responsible party of the resident received the resident fund quarterly statement for the period of 1/1/25, thru 3/31/25. Resident R502: resident fund statement indicated that the responsible party of the resident received the resident fund quarterly statement for the period…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility provided documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents medication regime was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication for three of five residents (Residents R4, R86 and, R106). Findings include: Review of facility Behavior Standard Index dated 3/17/25, indicated the facility will develop and implement behavior plans and medication regimes, in efforts to optimize the functional abilities of residents while monitoring for adverse side effects and improve behaviors. When control is needed to prevent harm and to allow evaluation and treatment, psychotropic medication may be required. Behavioral sheets will be utilized at the time of drug initiation or admission to home with drug order. Behaviors must be quantitatively and objectively documented by the nursing staff. Non-pharmacological interventions are implemented and assessed for effectiveness prior to considering initiation of medication. Review of the clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, and resident and staff interview , it was determined that the facility failed to inform residents on the grievance policy and procedures for seven of seven residents. Findings include: Review of facility policy Communication of Resident, Family, and Staff Concerns and Grievances, stated 3/17/25, indicated: The facility offers several communication avenues for residents, family members, and staff to questions and to report any concerns related to quality of care, customer service, regulatory issue or employee matter. Resident group interview on 5/14/25, at 10:40 a.m. indicated that residents did not know who the grievance officer was, how to file a grievance, where the grievance forms were or what the process was. Residents were asked how the facility responds to grievances and the residents said that they did not know how they respond to concerns. Review of resident council minutes for six months (November, December, January, Febraury, March, and April) failed to include discussion of resident rights, how residents file grievance, where the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, facility provided documents, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain a resident was free from neglect for two of five residents reviewed (Resident R48 and R260) which resulted in actual harm of a skin tear (Resident R48) and a dislocation of right elbow, fracture of the right distal radius (bone near wrist) and a fractured of the right coronoid process of the ulna (bone of forearm) (Resident R260). Findings include: The facility's policy Resident Protection from Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or exploitation last reviewed 3/17/25, indicated it is the facility's policy to treat residents with kindness, respect and in a manner that is at all times free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, exploitation or mistreatment. To protect our residents, procedures will be implemented in the areas of screening, training, prevention, identification, investigation, protection, reporting/response and corrective action. -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation with a complete and thorough investigation of an incident involving the potential for neglect for one of four residents (Resident R260). Findings include: The facility's policy Resident Protection from Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or exploitation last reviewed 3/17/25, indicated it is the facility's policy to treat residents with kindness, respect and in a manner that is at all times free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, exploitation or mistreatment. To protect our residents, procedures will be implemented in the areas of screening, training, prevention, identification, investigation, protection, reporting/response and corrective action. - Neglect is defined of the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical record, incident reports, reports submitted to the State, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect for one of three residents (Resident R260). Findings include: The facility's policy Resident Protection from Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or exploitation last reviewed 3/17/25, indicated it is the facility's policy to treat residents with kindness, respect and in a manner that is at all times free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, exploitation or mistreatment. To protect our residents, procedures will be implemented in the areas of screening, training, prevention, identification, investigation, protection, reporting/response and corrective action. - Neglect is defined of the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. - Neglect occurs when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to fully investigate an incident to eliminate possible abuse neglect for one of four residents (Resident R260). Findings include: The facility's policy Resident Protection from Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or exploitation last reviewed 3/17/25, indicated it is the facility's policy to treat residents with kindness, respect and in a manner that is at all times free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, exploitation or mistreatment. To protect our residents, procedures will be implemented in the areas of screening, training, prevention, identification, investigation, protection, reporting/response and corrective action. - Neglect is defined of the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. - Neglect occurs when the facility is aware…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for one of three residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Resident R57) and failed to provide a discharge summary completed by a physician for one of two residents (Resident R108). Findings include: Review of facility policy Transfer of Resident to Another Care Community dated 3/17/25, indicated transfer of resident to another care community is carried out based on physician order. Copy and prepare documents needed for transfer, including, but not limited to: - Medical Records Face sheet - Advanced Directives/POLST - Current physician orders - Medication Administration Record - Problem List - History and Physical - Appointments - Lab Work Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R57's MDS (Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing neurological assessment post unwitnessed fall for one of four residents (Resident R100). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Falls: Care During and After last reviewed 3/17/25, indicates all residents experiencing a fall will receive appropriate care and investigation of the cause. Assess residents ' condition immediately to determine extent of injury for both witnesses and unwitnessed falls by following Guideline for Fall Aftercare. Guidelines for Fall Aftercare: - If head injury, assess neurological status. - Monitor resident, including vital signs and neurological checks as indicated and ordered. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R100's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 3/11/25, indicated diagnoses of unsteadiness on feet, abnormalities of gait…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one of three residents (Resident R106). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Accidents and Incidents dated 3/17/25, indicated: An accident/incident is any happening, which is not consistent with routine operations or the routine care of the particular resident. Resident R106 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident R106's MDS (minimum data set an assessment of resident needs) dated 3/10/25, indicated the following diagnosis Unspecified Nondisplaced Fracture Of Second Cervical Vertebra Subsequent Encounter For Fracture With Routine Healing ( a cervical fracture often called a broken neck) , wandering (person becomes lost or confused), and unspecified dementia ( a condition where people lose the ability to think, remember, learn, make decisions and solve problems). Review of facility documentation progress notes dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate treatment and care for a peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC - a thin tube that's inserted through a vein in your arm and passed through to the larger veins near your heart) in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of two residents (Resident R70). Findings include: Review of the facility provided quick reference guide last reviewed 3/17/25, indicates dressing changes to central lines: PICC should be performed every seven days and if needed as soiled using aseptic (practices to prevent infection) technique. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R70's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 4/15/25, indicated diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a trauma survivor with trauma informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for two of two residents (Resident R4, and R9). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R4's MDS (Minimum Data Set - a periodic mandatory Federal assessment used to determine a resident's care needs) dated 2/20/25, indicated diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD-a mental health condition in people who have experienced or witnessed a traumatic event), anemia (low iron in the blood) and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R4's care plan indicated that resident had PTSD but failed to identify what the triggers were and how to avoid them. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R9's MDS dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain medications were administered as ordered by the physician for one of three residents (Resident R88). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Specific Medication Administration Procedures last reviewed 3/17/25, indicates to administer medications in a safe and effective manner. After administration, return to cart, replace medication container (if multi-dose and doses remain). Review of the facility policy Physician Orders last reviewed 3/17/25, last reviewed 3/17/25. indicated physician orders are followed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and are transcribed and carried out by persons legally authorized to do so. Review of Resident R88's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R88's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 4/2/25, indicated diagnosis of anemia (low…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner for one of two medication rooms (Hemlock Medication Room), and failed to store medications and biologicals properly and securely in three of five medications carts (Hickory hall, Hemlock hall, and [NAME] hall medication carts). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications last reviewed [DATE], indicates medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacture's recommendations or those of the supplier. Orally administered medications are kept separate from externally used medications and treatments. Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled or without secure closures are immediately removed from inventory. The nurse will check the expiration date of each medication before administering it. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent cross contamination during a dressing change for one of three residents (Resident R107). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Skin Integrity and Wound Management last reviewed 3/17/25, indicates to provide safe and effective care to prevent the occurrence of pressure ulcers, manage treatment and promote healing of all wounds. Review of the facility policy Wound Dressing Change last reviewed 3/17/25, indicates all wound care will be performed using medical aseptic technique, unless otherwise ordered by the physician, to prevent contamination of the wound bed. Procedure includes but not inclusive to: If a break in the aseptic technique occurs at any point, stop the procedure, remove your gloves, cleanse your hands, re-glove and/or re-gown and continue the procedure. Individual resident supplies may be placed on the over-bed table after it has been disinfected and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that equipment was in safe operating condition for one of three crash carts (Exam Room). Findings include: Review of the facility Emergency Cart policy dated [DATE], indicated the emergency cart will be appropriately stocked and ready for use when attempting to resuscitate a resident. The cart will be readily available for use and its inventory maintained. During an observation of the Exam Room crash cart (a cart maintained with equipment used in cardiac emergencies) on [DATE], at 10:49 a.m. revealed the following expired supplies: - Foley Insertion Kit (a thin flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine), expired [DATE]. - IV Start Kit expired [DATE]. - Syringe Piston not sealed closed. - Dressing Kit expired [DATE]. - Yanker Suction device (used to clear drainage out of a person ' s mouth) expired [DATE]. - Tracheostomy (an opening in the front of the neck that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-14 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, and employee file review, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a full-time qualified Food Service Director for ten of ten months (August 2023 through December 2023, and January 2024 through June 2024). Finding include: During an interview conducted at initial tour on 6/10/24, at 10:29 a.m. Food Service Director (FSD) Employee E3, stated that he was not a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and did not have any formal education or certificates in food service management. FSD Employee E3 stated that the facility employs a Registered Dietitian, but that he comes in building only two days per week. During an interview on 6/10/24, at 2:29 p.m. Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that FSD Employee E3 did not possess the appropriate qualifications as required. Review of FSD Employee E2's employee file, revealed that he did not possess qualifications for Food Service Director, and had been employed at the facility since 8/9/23. During an interview on 6/11/24, at 11:05 a.m. Registered Dietitian (RD) Employee E4 stated that he works in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider for four out of four residents sampled with facility-initiated transfers (Residents R5, R37, R94, and R108). Findings include: Review of Title 42 code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §483.15(c)(2) Documentation indicated: When the facility transfers or discharges a resident under any of the circumstances specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i)(A) through (F) of this section, the facility must ensure that the transfer or discharge is documented in the resident's medical record and appropriate information is communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider. (i) Documentation in the resident's medical record must include: (A) The basis for the transfer per paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section. (B) In the case of paragraph (c)(1)(i)(A) of this section, the specific resident need(s) that cannot be met,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-14 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — pattern
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide colostomy care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for two of two residents reviewed (Resident R58 and R262). Findings include: Review of facility policy Ostomy Care dated 4/8/24, indicated ostomy care will be provided for residents who have a urostomy, colostomy, or ileostomy. Ostomy appliances are changed and ostomy pouches are emptied as needed. The purpose of this policy is to maintain integrity of peristomal (around the stoma) skin, monitor condition of stoma (any opening in the body), manage odor, and promote resident's self-esteem. Review of facility policy Care Plan and Interdisciplinary Care Conferences- NU 6.1 dated 4/8/24, indicated an individualized care plan is initiated within 24 hours for each resident as part of the care delivery process. The care plan is a working tool that is reviewed and revised at specific intervals and as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for two of three residents (Resident R9 and Resident R58). Findings include: Review of facility policy Resident Assessment: RAI/MDS/CAA Process dated 4/8/24, indicated a minimum data set (MDS) will be completed for every resident within 14 days of admission and according to the Medicare and OBRA Guidelines. Refer to the MDS 3.0 manual for the requirements. The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated the following instructions: -Section J - Health Conditions: Current Tobacco Use, Ask the resident if they used tobacco in any form during the 7-day look-back period. If the resident states that they used tobacco…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of increased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels as ordered for one of three residents (Resident R82) and obtain physician orders for a resident's wound for one of three residents (Resident R260). Findings include: Review of facility policy Physician Orders- NU 2.18 dated 4/8/24, indicated physician orders are followed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and are transcribed and carried out by persons legally authorized to do so. It was indicated treatments may not be administered to the resident without the written approval from the attending physician. Review of facility policy Nursing Services - NU 2.15 dated 4/8/24, indicated nursing care includes the provision of all prescribed medications and treatments, and nursing care will be provided within the scope of practice and in accordance with nursing standards of care. Review of facility policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health for one of two residents (Resident R54). Findings include: Review of the Nutrition/Hydration Management- NU 9.9 policy last reviewed 4/8/24, stated residents will receive care and support to enhance potential for attaining the highest level of nutrition and hydration status and the pleasure of eating. It is the facility's policy to provide safe and effective care to manage residents' nutrition and hydration needs. Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 54's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/2/24, indicated diagnoses of dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), anxiety, and muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for one of three residents (Residents R75). Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea, (occurs when your breathing is interrupted during sleep, for longer than 10 seconds at least 5 times per hour (on average) throughout your sleep period), high blood pressure, and heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles. This causes fatigue, shortness of breath.) Review of Resident R75's care plan dated 5/4/22, indicated the resident receives oxygen therapy for ineffective gas exchange. Review of Resident 75's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/8/24, indicated the resident receives oxygen therapy while a resident. Review of Resident R75's physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to date opened medications in one of three medication carts (Willow Medication Cart). Findings include: Review of facility policy Storage of Medications dated 4/8/24, indicated when the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will be dated. Drugs dispensed in the manufacture's original container will carry the manufacturer's expiration date. Once opened, these will be good to use until the manufacturer's expiration date is reached unless the medication is in a multi-dose injectable vial, an ophthalmic medication, or an item for which the manufacturer has specified a usual life after opening. During an observation on 6/12/24, at 8:42 a.m. of the [NAME] Medication Cart indicated the following medications not dated upon opening: - Resident R41's TobraDex eye drops, no date opened. - Resident R41's Muro 128 eye drops, no date opened. - Resident R58's Lantus (prefilled pen to inject long acting insulin under the skin)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to properly contain and dispose of garbage in one of one outside dumpsters to prevent the potential for rodent and insect infestation. Findings include: Review of facility policy Waste Disposal, dated 4/8/24, indicated that trash will be deposited into a sealed container outside the premises. During an observation of the facility's outdoor trash receptacle on 6/10/24, at 11:00 a.m. revealed approximately five empty boxes piled up outside of the dumpster. During an interview on 6/10/24, at 11:00 a.m. Food Service Director Employee E93 confirmed that the facility failed to properly contain and dispose of garbage in the outside trash receptacles to prevent the potential for rodent and insect infestation. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management. 28 Pa. Code 207.2(a) Administrator's responsibility.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and accurate for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R260). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medical Records-The Medical Record date 12/12/23, indicated that the medical record will contain complete and accurate documentation, which clearly identifies the resident, justifies the diagnoses, condition, treatment, care approaches, and responses to the care provided. Review of Resident R260's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), fracture of one rib on right side, and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R260's progress note dated 6/5/24, indicated the resident was admitted from the hospital after a fall. It was documented that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain patient care equipment in a safe operating condition for one of three residents (Resident R11). Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 11's MDS (Minimum Data Set, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/10/24, indicated diagnoses of dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), morbid obesity, hemiplegia following cerebral infarction affecting left nondominant side (paralysis of left side of body following a stroke), and muscle weakness. Review of facility provided documentation, it was indicated the facility initially reached out to the resident's wheelchair manufacturer to repair Resident R11's wheelchair on 3/14/24. Resident R11's order for her wheelchair part was not confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of job descriptions, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed effectively manage the facility to prevent the development and transmission of communicable infections. Findings include: The signed job description for Nursing Home Administrator dated 4/8/24, indicated the purpose of this position is to direct the day-to-day operations of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards governing long-term facilities and to ensure that the highest degree of resident care and services are delivered and maintained. ' The signed job description for Director of Nursing dated 7/13/23, indicated the purpose of this position is to provide nursing management, set resident care standards for all direct care providers, and provide complete supervision and management for the nursing department. Based on the findings in this report that identified that the facility failed to prevent the transmission of Norovirus for 46 residents, which placed residents in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician and a family representative of a change in condition for two of three residents (Resident R14 and CR8). Findings include: Review of the facility Resident Change in Conditionv or Status policy last reviewed 4/8/24, indicated when a resident exhibits a change in condition from their baseline, the license nurse assigned to the resident will ensure timely notification to charge nurse, physician, and family. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and dementia (loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). Review of Resident R14's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/21/24, indicated the diagnoses were current. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$246,480 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $91,245 — penalty dated 2026-03-05
  • $155,235 — penalty dated 2024-05-08
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-20 for 22 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to QUALITY LIFE SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MARKIVICH, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
NICHOLAS, LAWRENCEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
TACK, STEVENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
TACK-BEARDSLEY, SUSANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
TACK-YUREK, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
ENCOVA MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/09/2025
FIRST NATIONAL INSURANCE AGENCYOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/09/2025
SUGAR CREEK REST, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/15/2025
CARTER, CHRISTINEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
KANIA, TONIAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
LOPICCOLO, BONNIEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
MERCURIO, RICHARDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
STAFFORD, LISAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$614K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 2%Other / private 29%

This home reported $614K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$287per resident / day
operating cost
$8,726per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$277per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395410. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next