No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Quality Life Services - Markleysburg

252 Main Street, Markleysburg, PA 15459 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (724) 329-4830 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)4 actual-harm citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 4 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
24441 Garrett Hwy · (301) 387-8718 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
248 Maple St · (301) 746-5881 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
160 Main St · (724) 329-4078 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.8%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.9%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.8%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.4%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.7%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.5%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.7%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.5%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table34.5%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine73.3%68.7%79.4%typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.52
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
54.9%
Total nursing turnover
63.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 56.8 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-25)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-07-31)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records and facility documents, resident and staff interviews, and observations it was determined that the facility failed to properly temperature the hot water prior to giving it to a resident (Resident R11) which resulted in actual harm of second-degree burn (a burn marked by pain, blistering, and damage to the outer layer of skin with redness and swelling of the tissues beneath the burn) to abdomen, and pelvic area. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Safe Provision of Hot Beverages to Residents - Activities last reviewed 5/1/26, indicated its purpose was to ensure the safe preparation, handling, and distribution of hot beverages to residents in order to prevent burns and other avoidable injuries, while supporting resident comfort, dignity, and choice. Beverages are to be served below scalding temperature. DO NOT serve hot liquids greater than 150 F (Fahrenheit). Hot beverage(s) is to sit for at least 15 minutes with the lid off before served to the resident. After…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and/or update person-centered care plans related transfer and bed mobility assistance levels for three of 17 residents (Residents R1, R2, R3) that resulted in the actual harm of a nasal fracture and knee fracture for one of four residents (Resident R1) . This was identified as past noncompliance.Findings include: Review of facility policy Care Plan and Interdisciplinary Care Conferences dated 6/9/25, indicated the care plan is a working tool that is reviewed and revised at specific intervals and as needed to reflect response to care and changing needs and goals. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 3/8/26, included diagnoses of quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), history of a stroke, and a seizure disorder. Review of Section GG:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documents, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent falls for two of four residents (Resident R1 and R2) that resulted in the actual harm of a nasal fracture and knee fracture for one of four residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Falls: Care During and After dated 6/9/25, indicated, All residents experiencing a fall will receive appropriate care and investigation and interventions will be conducted by the interdisciplinary team. Included in the procedure were the following steps: 5. Remove any causes to fall and implement preventative measures to prevent reoccurrence. 6. Update care plan to reflect new interventions. Review of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine - Caregiver Guide and Instructions for Safe Bed Mobility published 4/28/17, indicated bed mobility refers to activities such as scooting in bed, rolling, side-lying to sitting,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-07-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on the review of professional standards of practice, facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement care and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer that developed into a Stage III pressure ulcer (full thickness skin loss that extends into the subcutaneous or fat layer) to the right lateral ankle and a Stage I pressure ulcer (non-blanchable reddened area) to the right inner and outer aspect of the right knee from a immobilizer brace worn due to a fracture. This resulted in actual harm for one of two residents (Resident R3).Findings include:Clinical Practice Guidelines indicate that the treatment of pressure ulcers should involve multiple tactics aimed at alleviating the conditions contributing to ulcer development (i.e., support surfaces, repositioning, and nutritional support); protecting the wound from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on a review of facility policies, clinical records, investigation report and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the environment was free of accident hazards for one of two residents (Resident R3) resulting in harm when hot soup spilled onto Resident R3's right upper, inner thigh area causing a second- degree burn measuring 2 cm x 1.5 cm x <0.1 cm blister requiring treatment. Findings include:Review of the facility policy Accidents and Incidents dated 6/9/25, with a previous review date of 6/11/24, indicated that if an accident/incident occurs involving a resident are reported and investigated for corrective actions and quality improvement. The facility policy regarding hot liquid safety was not provided.The facility provided food temperatures identified the soup at 170 degrees Fahrenheit.Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, resident records, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to uphold the resident's rights to voice grievances without fear of retaliation for ten residents reviewed (Resident R800, R801, R802, R803, R804, R805, R806, R807, R808, and R809).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Rights last reviewed 5/1/26, indicated a resident has the right to file complaints with any individual or agency and recommend changes in policies, home rules and services of the home without intimidation, retaliation or threat of discharge. During a group meeting on 6/23/26 from 1:30 p.m. to 2:15 p.m., Resident R804 did not want to be interviewed until they confirmed that their name was not going to be mentioned when the state surveyor discussed issues with the facility. They stated they are afraid to speak up against the facility staff in fear of retaliation. Resident R802 stated we don't want to bite the hand that feeds us. Residents R805, R807, R803, and R806 stated they did not want the staff to come back and not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified Food Service Director to manage the daily operations of the Dietary Department for 12 of 12 months (July 2025 through June 25, 2026). Findings include:During an interview on 6/23/26, at approximately 10:30 a.m., the Dietary Supervisor Employee E5 stated that she was the manager and was currently working on her Certification to become a CDM.During an interview on 6/24/26, at approximately 8:58 a.m., Registered Dietician (RD) Employee E6 stated that she comes to this facility usually once a week, she goes to a few facilities.During an interview on 6/24/26, at approximately, 9:00 a.m., the Dietary Supervisor Employee E5 and RD Employee E6 confirmed that the facility currently does not have a Certified Dietary Manager and the Registered Dietician is not employed by the facility full time. The facility failed to show evidence that any staff met the qualifications for the position of Food Service Director.Pa Code: 201.18(e)(6) Management.Pa Code: 211.6(c)(d) Dietary Services.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident council interviews, observation of menus and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food in accordance with resident preferences and provide meals following national guidelines and are periodically updated to mitigate the risk of menu fatigue for the current menu cycle. Findings include: Review of CFR S483.60(c)(1)-(7) Menus must-S483.60(c)(4) Reflect, based on a facility's reasonable efforts, the religious, cultural and ethnic needs of the resident population, as well as input received from residents and resident groups;S483.60(c)(5) Be updated periodically;o Menus meet basic nutritional needs by providing meals based on individual nutritional assessment, the individualized plan of care, and established national guidelines and are periodically updated to mitigate the risk of menu fatigue. During the resident council meeting on 6/23/26, at 1:30 p.m., the consensus was identified that the food menu choices repeat and you get same foods over and over. The residents stated that they have food committee and are fearful to tell staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-25 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide the required 80 square feet of space per resident for 16 of 25 rooms. Findings include:During an observation of the facility floor plan on 6/22/26, at 2:15 p.m. the below room findings were as follows: room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 72.69 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 73.40 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 71.37 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (4 beds) 69.52 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (3 beds) 70.67 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 73.70 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 74.61 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 71.61 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (3 beds) 76.52 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (4 beds) 77.06 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (3 beds) 70.91 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 71.90 square feet per resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policies, documents, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience on 6/24/26, during the lunch meal service to one of six residents. (Resident R3) in the main dining room.Findings include:A review of facility Resident Rights Policy policy dated 5/1/26, indicated a resident has the right to file complaints with any individual or agency and recommend changes in policies, home rules and services of the home without intimidation, retaliation or threat of discharge. The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated that a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) is a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment. Scores from a BIMS assessment suggest the following distributions:13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, resident clinical records, reports submitted to the State, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report allegations of neglect for one of two sampled resident records (Resident R46).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Protection from Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Exploitation, dated 5/1/26, indicated that when an incident of abuse, neglect, etc., the facility will notify the PA Department of Health via electronic reporting system (ERS) within 24 hours and complete and online PB22 if directed to do so. During a review of a facility submitted report dated 6/2/26, identified that Resident R40 had alleged neglect by Nurse Aide (NA)Employee E4 and when the facility was investigating the allegation, NA Employee E7's statement and Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) Employee E1 identified a second resident had been neglected by NA Employee E4, Resident R46. During an interview on 6/25/26, at approximately 10:50 a.m., RNS Employee E1 stated that Resident R46 was found with his bed soiled in feces, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation involving an allegation of resident neglect for two of three sampled resident records (Resident R40 and R46).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Resident Protection from Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Exploitation, dated 5/1/26, indicated that Neglect is the failure of the facility and or its employees to provide services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Identification of any abuse, neglect, etc., will be identified through complaints of abuse and use of incident reports and will be thoroughly investigated and reported to the Administration and the Department of Health with 24 hours, with PB22's as necessary. During a review of the facility submitted report dated 6/2/26, identified that Resident R40 reported that he does not ask for help from Nurse Aide Employee E4 because she refuses to help him and he holds his urine and bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assess, document, and notify physicians of increased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels for one of five residents reviewed (Residents R45).Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control define diabetes as: Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic (long-lasting) health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy. Most of the food you eat is broken down into sugar (also called glucose) and released into your bloodstream. When your blood sugar goes up, it signals your pancreas to release insulin. Insulin acts like a key to let the blood sugar into your body's cells for use as energy. If you have diabetes, your body either doesn't make enough insulin or can't use the insulin it makes as well as it should. When there is not enough insulin or cells stop responding to insulin, too much blood sugar stays in your bloodstream. Over time, that can cause serious health problems, such as heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to document each resident was offered an influenza and/or pneumococcal immunization for two of five residents reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations (Residents R2 and R33).Findings include: A review of facility policy, Influenza and Pneumococcal Disease Prevention, dated 5/1/26, indicated to reduce the disease morbidity and mortality associated with influenza and pneumococcal disease, influenza and pneumococcal vaccines are offered to all residents A review of the clinical record indicated Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included stroke, hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body), and seizures. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 6/19/26, indicated the resident did not receive and was not offered the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and review of facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to protect a resident from abuse and neglect for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings include:Review of facility policy Resident Protection from Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, or Exploitation dated 5/1/26 and 6/9/26, indicated the facility treats all residents with kindness, respect and in a manner that is at all times free from any form of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, exploitation, or mistreatment. 'Abuse' is defined as the willful infliction of harm, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm or pain or mental anguish, or deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 'Verbal Abuse' is defined as any use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 19 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-02 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documentation, cited deficiencies from a previous survey, review of plans of correction documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program failed to correct previously cited deficiencies.Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI)Plan dated 6/9/25, indicated it provides an ongoing, systematic evaluation and improvement process to help ensure that each of the nursing homes and other operational are meeting the organization's quality standards. The facility's deficiencies and plan of correction for the State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) for the following surveys, revealed the facility developed a plan of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure the facility-maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. Review of the facility's deficiencies and plan of corrections for the State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending 12/18/25, revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, incident reports, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent residents from injury while providing care for one of three residents (Resident R1).Findings include:Review of the facility policy Resident Protection from Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, or Exploitation, defines neglect as the failure of the facility, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Neglect occurs when the facility is aware of, or should have been aware of, goods and services that a resident requires but the facility failed to provide them to the resident, that has resulted in or may result in physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress.The facility was unable to provide a policy regarding Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).The facility was unable to provide a policy regarding Resident Transfers.The facility was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly date insulin medication vials upon opening, failed to dispose of expired insulin medication vials, and failed to store medications in a safe and sanitary manner in one of two medication carts reviewed (Blue cart).Findings include:Review of facility policy Insulin Vial Use indicated once an insulin vial is removed from the refrigerator and/or opened for use, they will be marked with the resident's name, the date they are opened, and dated for expiration as follows:-Levemir/Lantus (long-acting insulin that works slowly, over about 24 hours) - 42 days-Novolog/Aspart (fast acting insulin that starts to work about 15 minutes after injection, peaks in about one hour, and keeps working for two to four hours) - 28 days-Novolog Mix 70/30 (starts working in two to four hours, peaks in four to ten hours, and keeps working for 12 - 18 hours) - 14 daysReview of facility provided Storage and Disposal of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on clinical record reviews and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper monitoring and documentation of behaviors for one of three residents (Resident R51).Findings include:Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included a stroke, lung disease, and falls. Review of a progress note dated 7/1/25, indicated Resident R51 touched Resident R41 and when asked he stated he wanted to and that she did not give permission, but he wanted to do it. Review of a facility provided document dated 7/1/25, indicated that Resident R51 had inappropriately touched Resident R41's breast under her clothing. The investigation indicated Resident R51 was asked if he had increased sexual drives and he stated he did not know and was asked to go a Behavioral Health Unit but refused. The facility physician notified and provided medication for hypersexual behaviors.Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide the required 80 square feet of space per resident for 16 of 25 rooms.During an observation of the facility floor plan on 7/30/25, at 2:15 p.m. the below room findings were as follows: room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 72.69 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 73.40 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 71.37 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (4 beds) 69.52 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (3 beds) 70.67 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 73.70 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 74.61 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 71.61 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (3 beds) 76.52 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (4 beds) 77.06 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (3 beds) 70.91 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 71.90 square feet per resident bed.room [ROOM NUMBER]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on review of staff education records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct at least 12 hours of in-service education, within 12 months of their hire date anniversary, for nurse aides as required for five of five nurse aides (Employees Employee E2, E3, E4, E5 and E6). Findings include:Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff members did not have 12 hours of in-service education: NA Employee E2 had a hire date of 5/9/11, with approximately four hours of in-service education between 5/9/24, and 5/9/25.NA Employee E3 had a hire date of 1/7/15, with approximately five hours of in-service education between 1/7/24 and 1/7/25.NA Employee E4 had a hire date of 3/2/22, with approximately five hours of in-service education between 3/2/24 and 3/2/25.NA Employee E5 had a hire date of 6/30/23, with approximately nine hours of in-service education between 6/30/24 and 6/30/25.NA Employee E6 had a hire date of 5/9/24, with approximately seven hours of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on review of facility policy, resident record, investigation documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect for one of four sampled residents (Resident R33).Findings include:A review of the facility Resident Protection From Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment Or Exploitation policy dated 6/11/24, indicated that residents will be free from any form of neglect and the facility will report all allegations of abuse/neglect and will notify the PA Department of Health/Long Term Care Division via the electronic reporting system. A review of Resident R33's admission record indicated the resident was re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (a chronic neurological disorder where the immune system attacks healthy cells), and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (nerves that carry messages back and forth between the bladder and the spinal cord and brain do not function…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and facility incidents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' clinical records were complete and accurately documented for two of six residents reviewed (Resident R41 and R42).Review of facility policy Elopement Prevention reviewed 6/11/24 and 6/9/25, indicated the facility properly assess residents and plan of care to prevent accidents related to wandering behavior or elopement. Upon admission, readmission, quarterly, and as needed, nurses will complete a Wandering Risk Assessment. Photographs of the resident are provided to the receptionist. The receptionist will maintain the list of all residents at risk for elopement, including the resident's name, and room number.Review of facility policy Accidents and Incidents reviewed 6/11/24 and 6/9/25, indicated an accident/incident is any happening which is not consistent with routine operations or the routine care of the particular resident. Review of facility policy Resident Change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documents, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from neglect that resulted in insulin not being administered as ordered for four of eight residents (Residents R1, R2, R3, and R4). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Resident Protection From Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Exploitation dated 6/11/24, defined neglect as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 6/6/25, included diagnoses of hypertension (a condition where the force of blood flow is too high against the artery) and Type 2 diabetes. Review of the physician orders 3/19/25, indicated to give Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents are free of significant medication errors for four of eight residents (Residents R1, R2, R3, and R4). Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication Administration reviewed 6/11/24, indicated that medications will be administered in accordance with written orders of licensed physicians, manufacturer's specifications and professional standards of practice. Review of the National Library of Medicine information dated, indicated insulin aspart is an injectable medication used to treat diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time). It further stated, If you are using insulin aspart suspension to treat type 2 diabetes, it is usually injected within 15 minutes before a meal. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately respond to a resident's change in condition for one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Bowel Management dated 2/22/24, indicated the standard regimen for bowel management will be followed for a resident who experiences alteration in bowel elimination. The procedure was listed as follows: 1. Initiate bowel regimen per protocol as indicated: -On third day without BM (bowel movement), give Senna (Senokot, a vegetable-based laxative), two tablets by mouth. -On fourth day, if Senna ineffective, give Bisacodyl (Dulcolax, a laxative medication) suppository rectally. -On evening of the fourth day, if Bisacodyl suppository ineffective, administer Fleet enema (saline enema) rectally. 2. If still no BM after completion of protocol, notify physician. 3. Document administration on MAR / TAR (medication administration record / treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify physicians of increased and decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels and failed to assess residents for hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) and hypoglycemia (low blood glucose), for four of six residents reviewed (Residents R6, R31, R39, and R45). Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control defines diabetes as: Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic (long-lasting) health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy. Most of the food you eat is broken down into sugar (also called glucose) and released into your bloodstream. When your blood sugar goes up, it signals your pancreas to release insulin. Insulin acts like a key to let the blood sugar into your body's cells for use as energy. If you have diabetes, your body either doesn't make enough insulin or can't use the insulin it makes as well as it should. When there isn't enough insulin or cells stop responding to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documents, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent falls for one of three residents (Resident R25). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Falls: Care During and After dated 6/11/24, indicated, All residents experiencing a fall will receive appropriate care and investigation and interventions will be conducted by the interdisciplinary team. Included in the procedure were the following steps: 5. Remove any causes to fall and implement preventative measures to prevent reoccurrence. 6. Update care plan to reflect new interventions. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 5/30/24, included diagnoses of dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life) and unsteadiness on feet. Review of a progress note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on the prevention of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation for four of ten staff members (Employees E2, E3, E5, and E7). Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated 5/14/24, previously reviewed 3/26/24, 12/21/23, indicated Staff training and education consists of the following training topics that are mandatory annually such as abuse, neglect, and misappropriation as well as the Elder Justice Act, residents rights, person centered care, dementia training, and infection control and prevention. Review of facility provided documents and training record for Employees E2, E3, E5, and E7 revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on effective communication. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E2 had a hire date of 4/21/99, failed to have prevention of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation in-service education between 4/21/23, and 4/21/24. NA Employee E3 had a hire date of 5/9/11, failed to have prevention of abuse, neglect, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health services to a resident to maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for one of six residents (Resident R39). Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 5/14/24, indicated the facility will provide care for residents with psychiatric or mood disorders. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment). The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 5/24/24, included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-07-10 · tag F0941 — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for four of ten staff members (Employees E2, E4, E6, and E7). Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated 5/14/24, previously reviewed 3/26/24, 12/21/23, indicated Staff training and education consists of the following training topics that are mandatory annually such as abuse, neglect, and misappropriation as well as the Elder Justice Act, residents rights, person centered care, dementia training, and infection control and prevention. Review of facility provided documents and training record for Employees E2, E4, E6, and E7 revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on effective communication. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E2 had a hire date of 4/21/99, failed to have effective communication in-service education between 4/21/23, and 4/21/24. NA Employee E4 had a hire date of 1/5/22, failed to have effective communication in-service education between 1/5/23, and 1/5/24. Licensed Practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-07-10 · tag F0942 — pattern
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on residents rights for two of ten staff members (Employees E2 and E7). Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated 5/14/24, previously reviewed 3/26/24, 12/21/23, indicated Staff training and education consists of the following training topics that are mandatory annually such as abuse, neglect, and misappropriation as well as the Elder Justice Act, residents rights, person centered care, dementia training, and infection control and prevention. Review of facility provided documents and training record for Employees E2 and E7 revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on residents rights. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E2 had a hire date of 4/21/99, failed to have residents rights in-service education between 4/21/23, and 4/21/24. Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E7 had a hire date of 4/22/13, failed to have residents rights in-service education between 4/22/23, and 4/22/24. During an interview on 7/10/24, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-07-10 · tag F0944 — pattern
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) for six of ten staff members (Employees E2, E3, E4, E5, E6, and E7). Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated 5/14/24, previously reviewed 3/26/24, 12/21/23, indicated Staff training and education consists of the following training topics that are mandatory annually such as abuse, neglect, and misappropriation as well as the Elder Justice Act, residents rights, person centered care, dementia training, and infection control and prevention. Review of facility provided documents and training records for E2, E3, E4, E5, E6, and E7 revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on QAPI. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E2 had a hire date of 4/21/99, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 4/21/23, and 4/21/24. NA Employee E3 had a hire date of 5/9/11, failed to have QAPI in-service education between 5/9/23, and 5/9/24. NA Employee E4 had a hire date of 1/5/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-07-10 · tag F0946 — pattern
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Compliance and Ethics for six of ten staff members (Employees E2, E3, E4, E5, E6, and E7). Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated 5/14/24, previously reviewed 3/26/24, 12/21/23, indicated Staff training and education consists of the following training topics that are mandatory annually such as abuse, neglect, and misappropriation as well as the Elder Justice Act, residents rights, person centered care, dementia training, and infection control and prevention. Review of facility provided education documents and training records for E2, E3, E4, E5, E6, and E7 revealed the following staff members did not have documented training on Compliance and Ethics. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E2 had a hire date of 4/21/99, failed to have Compliance and Ethics in-service education between 4/21/23, and 4/21/24. NA Employee E3 had a hire date of 5/9/11, failed to have Compliance and Ethics in-service education between 5/9/23, and 5/9/24. NA Employee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to QUALITY LIFE SERVICES — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TACK, STEVENIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF33%since 06/25/2025
TACK-BEARDSLEY, SUSANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL33%since 07/01/2024
MARKIVICH, MICHAELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2024
KEMP, AMYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
TACK-YUREK, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2024
MOSES, ROBERTIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$470K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 94%Medicare 1%Other / private 5%

About 94% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $470K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$344per resident / day
operating cost
$10,451per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$304per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395870. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next