No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Luzerne

463 North Hunter Hwy, Drums, PA 18222 · For profit - Corporation · 37 certified beds · (570) 788-4175 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Feb 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$86,122 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Feb 2024
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $86,122 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-17)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
144 S Old Turnpike Rd · (570) 788-6363 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
611 Centre St · (570) 526-2400 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
625 Centre St · (570) 436-8647 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Angela Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
87 S Hunter Hwy · (570) 788-3141

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased36.0%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.7%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.0%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.1%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened29.8%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication39.2%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.2%25.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table33.3%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.7%1.4%1.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.941.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.861.181.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.26hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 7.9–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.72
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.00
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.75
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.56
RN hoursweekends
36.1%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 37 beds and averages 34.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-16)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

57 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2025-06-11 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide meals in accordance with resident needs and preferences to ensure adequate nutrition and hydration and failed to consistently provide bedtime snacks as required for 3 of 36 residents. This deficient practice resulted in a lack of nutritionally adequate meals for 36 of 36 residents in the facility, created the potential for nutritional deficiencies, and placed all residents in Immediate Jeopardy to their health and safety. Findings include: A review of the facility's undated policy titled Frequency of Meals revealed that each resident shall receive three meals daily as well as snacks in between meals. The policy indicated that bedtime snacks are routinely offered to residents based on preference and are documented in the electronic medical record. It also stated that no more than 14 hours should pass between the evening meal and breakfast unless a nourishing bedtime snack is provided. During the survey conducted on June 10 and 11, 2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · L2025-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies, manufacturer instructions for use, staff interviews, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to follow safe and sanitary food handling practices during the washing, sanitizing, and preparation of cooking equipment, dishware, tableware, and utensils in the facility's kitchen. This failure resulted in the improper sanitization of food-contact surfaces, created an increased potential for foodborne illness, and placed 36 out of 36 residents in a condition of Immediate Jeopardy to their health and safety. Findings include: Food safety and inspection standards for safe food handling indicate that everything that comes in contact with food must be kept clean and food that is mishandled can lead to foodborne illness. Safe steps in food handling, cooking, and storage are essential in preventing foodborne illness. You cannot always see, smell, or taste harmful bacteria that may cause illness according to the USDA (The United States Department of Agriculture, also known as the Agriculture Department, is the U.S. federal executive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-02-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and investigation reports, and observation, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide timely and consistent care, according to professional standards of practice, to prevent multiple facility acquired, unstageable pressure sores for one out of the 13 residents sampled (Resident 10). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination) and schizophrenia (a chronic mental health disorder that involves problems with cognition, behavior, and emotions). The resident's care plan, dated [DATE], indicated that Resident 10 has potential for impairment to skin integrity with deceased mobility and bowel incontinence with interventions for encouraging good nutrition and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and a review of employee credentials, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the registered dietitian (RD) provided the required on-site oversight of the food and nutrition services department. Findings include: According to current federal regulatory guidance the facility must employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care and the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment. In the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian the director of food and nutrition services the facility must designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. The director of food and nutrition services must at a minimum meet one of the following qualifications- (A) A certified dietary manager; or (B) A certified food service manager; or (C) Has similar national certification for food service management and safety from a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's planned cycle menus, staff interviews, and observations, it was determined the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served in accordance with planned menus to meet the nutritional needs and specialized dietary requirements for 14 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow planned menus for 4 of 4 residents requiring a pureed diet (Residents 11, 12, 4, and 5), 9 of 9 residents requiring a mechanical ground diet (Residents 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21), and 1 of 1 resident requiring a gluten-free diet (Resident 2). Findings included: A review of the planned lunch menu for June 10, 2025, revealed the listed items included beef steak and peppers (2 oz), a vegetable blend (1/2 cup), Texas toast (1/2 slice), and gelatin with fruit. Further review of the facility's diet extension menu for that day indicated the pureed diet (a method for turning solid foods into a smooth, creamy, or paste-like consistency for residents with a chewing or swallowing problem) should have included pureed beef pepper steak, pureed vegetables,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, test tray evaluation, review of resident concern forms, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure foods were served at safe and palatable temperatures for residents consuming regular diets identified for 1 test tray and 7 of 7 residents (Residents 1, 3, 6, 7,8, 9, and 10) who voiced concerns related to food temperature, palatability, or meal service timeliness. Findings include: According to the federal regulation 483.60(i)-(2) Food safety requirements - the definition of Danger Zone, found under the Definitions section, is food temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit and below 135 degrees Fahrenheit that allow rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness. A review of facility resident concern forms revealed recurring complaints related to food temperature, palatability, and timeliness of meal service: On April 22, May 11, and May 29, 2025, Resident 6 complained of cold food and poor taste. On April 25, 2025, Resident 3 reported unpalatable food and small portion sizes. On April 25, 2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, written notices of facility-initiated transfers, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficiently detailed written notices of facility-initiated hospital transfers to the resident and the resident's representative for one of five residents sampled (Resident 1), by failing to identify the reason for the move in writing. Findings include: A review of the clinical record for Resident 1 revealed the following facility-initiated hospital transfers: On February 3, 2025, Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility on February 10, 2025. On February 10, 2025, the resident was again transferred to the hospital and returned to the facility on February 12, 2025. On February 24, 2025, the resident was transferred to the hospital and was discharged from the facility at the time of the survey. A review of the clinical record and facility documentation revealed no evidence that written notices were provided to Resident 1 or the resident's representative for the above transfer dates.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the facility's bed hold policy and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide written notice of the specifics of the facility's bed hold policy to the resident, responsible party or legal representative at the time of the transfer, to include the duration and reserve bed payment for one resident out of five sampled (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of a facility policy for bed hold (no policy review date available at the time of the survey) revealed, for Medicaid residents, the bed will be held while a resident is in the hospital or on therapeutic leave. Medicaid pays for hospitalization of 15 days and therapeutic leave of 30 days. The resident is allowed to return to the facility in this time frame. If there is no bed available at the facility, on the date of hospital discharge, the facility will make every effort to place the resident in a local facility. A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, facility policy provided to residents upon transfer from the facility, and interview with facility staff revealed the facility failed to demonstrate the implementation of specifically delineated procedures for Medicaid payor source bed holds and the provision of notices of the facility's bed hold policy in an understandable language that allow a resident to return to the facility after a transfer to the emergency room for one resident out of five reviewed. (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Bed Reservations for Medicaid Covered Residents (no policy revision date noted) indicated that Medicaid residents are permitted a maximum of 15 consecutive bed-hold days per hospitalization. The policy further states that residents shall be allowed to return to the nursing facility immediately upon the first availability of a bed in a semi-private room, provided the resident continues to require the facility's services. A review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed the resident was covered under a Medicaid managed care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, a review of personnel files and employee credentials, it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient staff with the necessary skill set and competencies to ensure appropriate nutritional oversight for residents in the facility and failed to ensure the full-time director of food and nutrition services, who was not a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional, received frequently scheduled consultations from a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutritional professional. Findings include: Federal regulations require the facility to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to meet the nutritional needs of residents, considering resident assessments, individual plans of care, and the facility assessment. In the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian, the Director of Food and Nutrition Services must meet minimum qualifications and receive frequent consultations from a qualified dietitian or other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-16 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of professional literature, the facility's assessment, facility documentation, a review of the medical and nutritional needs of the resident census, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment, using evidence-based methods, which identified and accurately reflected the specific resources necessary and available to care for its specific resident population. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Memorandum, Revised Guidance for Long-Term Care Facility Assessment Requirements (QSO-24-13-NH) dated June 18, 2024, revealed the facility assessment must include an evaluation of diseases, conditions, physical or cognitive limitations of the resident population, acuity (the level of severity of residents' illnesses, physical, mental, and cognitive limitations, and conditions), and any other pertinent information about the resident population as a whole that may affect the services the facility must provide. Further review revealed the assessment of the resident population…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by failing to ensure that licensed nurses accurately administered prescribed medication for one of 15 sampled residents. (Resident 29). Findings include: According to the Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11 (a)(1)(2)(4) indicates the registered nurse was to carry out nursing care actions that promote, maintain, and restore the well-being of individuals. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145 Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (a) The LPN is prepared to function as a member of the health-care team by exercising sound judgement based on preparation, knowledge, skills, understandings and past experiences in nursing situations. The LPN participates in the planning, implementation, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY determined the facility failed to assess, evaluate, monitor nutritional parameters, and develop and implement individualized nutritional interventions to maintain nutritional parameters and deter weight loss for three residents (Residents 18, 12, and 29) out of 15 residents sampled. Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Chapter 21, Professional and Vocational Standards: Responsibilities of the Licensed Dietitian/ Nutritionist Section 21.711 Professional Conduct indicated that the Licensed Dietitian/ Nutritionist shall provide information which will enable patients to make their own informed decisions regarding nutrition and dietetic therapy, including the reasonable expectations of the professional relationship. Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE], failed to indicate the necessity of a qualified dietitian or clinically qualified nutrition professional to meet the nutritional needs of the residents. During interview with the foodservice director (FSD) on January 14, 2025, at approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 44 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, resident and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement effective safety measures to prevent the ingestion of an illegal substance for one resident out of 15 residents sampled. (Resident 25). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (a mental health condition that combines symptoms of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder- people with this condition experience periods of extreme energy, irritability, and restlessness and/or periods of depressive episodes, low energy, and hopelessness), chronic pain, and polysubstance use disorder (includes use of drugs such as cocaine, misuse of alcohol, tobacco, or a prescription medicine such as opioids). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated October 28,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, select facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain oxygen equipment in a functional and sanitary manner for two residents out of 15 sampled (Residents 13 and 24). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Concentrator last reviewed by the facility on September 16, 2024, revealed that precautions will be taken to maintain the integrity of the oxygen concentrator (bedside machine that concentrates ambient air to supply an oxygen-rich gas stream) unit and to promote safety during oxygen administration. Be sure the cabinet air filter is in place. The air filter is to be removed from the door in the back of the unit by nursing. Wash the filter in warm water and towel dry. Do not operate the unit without the air filter or while the air filter is still damp. Review of Resident 13's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to offer and/or provide the pneumococcal immunization, unless the immunization was medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized, to one resident out of five residents reviewed (Residents 29). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Influenza and Pneumococcal Pneumonia Vaccination and Immunization Program last reviewed September 16, 2024, revealed that each resident is offered a pneumococcal immunization unless the immunization is medically contraindicated. Nursing staff will provide education information to the resident/authorized representative prior to the administration of each vaccine. Once education has been completed, a signed consent form is to be obtained prior to administration of the vaccine. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include atherosclerotic heart disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of employee personnel files and select facility policy and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to demonstrate that licensed nurses possess the necessary competencies and skills to accurately prepare and administer prescribed medications to residents for 1 out of 5 residents reviewed. (Resident A1) Findings include: According to the American Nurses Association the Standards of Practice describe a competent level of nursing care as demonstrated by the critical thinking model known as the nursing process. The nursing process includes the components of assessment, diagnosis, out- comes identification, planning, implementation, and evaluation. Nurses' responsibility for medication administration includes ensuring that the right medication is properly drawn up in the correct dose and administered at the right time through the right route to the right patient. A review of a facility policy entitled Medication Administration - General Guidelines that was last reviewed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean and safe resident environment. Findings include: An observation on July 23, 2024, at 9:09 AM revealed dirt and debris was on the floors throughout the hallway of the south side nursing unit. Observation in the common resident bathroom on this hall revealed hair and a dried yellow-urine like substance on the toilet. Observation in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed dried feces on the toilet and toilet seat. Dirt and debris was observed on the bathroom floor. Dirt, debris and a dried red substance was observed on the floor of resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. [NAME] streaks were observed on the wall next to the door. Observation in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed dried stain streaks on the wall next to the resident's dresser. There was an accummulation of dust and dirt stuck to these streaks on the wall. Observation in the resident shower room on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping services to maintain a clean and orderly environment and ready availability of clean bath linens, to at least three of the five residents sampled (Residents 1, 2, and 22) and on two of the two nursing halls. Findings include: During an interview on June 18, 2024, at 8:50 AM, Resident 1 stated the facility has a good part-time housekeeper. He stated that the bathrooms and hallways are dirty when this housekeeper is not working. He said he is upset because he uses a shared bathroom, and often finds feces on the toilet and floor in this bathroom that he shares with another resident. During a facility tour on June 18, 2024, at 9:00 AM, an observation of the resident shower room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a soiled brief, used wash towels, and clothing on the floor. A used wet wash towel was observed hanging from the metal grab bar in the shower. A stained clothing protector was observed in the wash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-18 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement individualized plans to manage residents' dementia-related behavioral symptoms to promote resident safety and the residents' highest practicable physical and mental well-being for one resident out of five sampled (Resident 26). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed hospital documentation, prior to the resident's admission to this current long term care facility, dated April 18, 2024, noting that Resident 26 was discharged from another long-term care facility and not permitted to return. The documentation indicated that Resident 26 needs a locked dementia unit, requires one to one level of supervision (1:1), is an elopement risk, and was redirectable until recently. Resident 26 was admitted to this current long term facility on April 22, 2024, with diagnoses that included dementia (a condition characterized by the loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medically related social services for one resident out of the five sampled (Resident 22). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiparesis (a weakness or inability to move one side of the body) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD is a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung that blocks airflow and makes it hard to breathe). A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated March 19, 2024, revealed that Resident 22 is cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool within the Cognitive Section of the MDS that is used to assess the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient staff with the necessary skill set and competencies to ensure appropriate nutritional oversight for residents in the facility and nutritional assessment for one (Resident 2) out of 13 residents reviewed. Findings include: During an interview conducted on February 27, 2024, at 9:15 AM the foodservice director confirmed that she worked full-time and was a certified dietary manager (CDM). The CDM stated that the facility no longer employed a qualified dietitian on a full-time, part-time, or consultant basis. Interview with the nursing home administrator on February 27, 2024, at 10:00 AM confirmed that the facility's qualified dietitian resigned on January 3, 2024. A review of the Certifying Board for Dietary managers (the credentialing agency for the Association of Nutrition and Food Service professionals) scope of practice for certified dietary managers, these individuals were able to conduct…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-29 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly maintain garbage and refuse containers in garbage storage area in a sanitary manner. Findings include: Observation on February 27, 2024, at 8:15 AM revealed the dumpster lid was not closed and two bags of garbage were placed on the ground next to the dumpster. There was scattered debris including paper wrappers, a slice of bread, and empty plastic beverage bottles on the ground surrounding the dumpster. Observation on February 28, 2024, at 2:30 PM revealed two bags of garbage on the ground next to the dumpster. Interview with the foodservice director (FSD) on February 29, 2024, at 11:45 AM confirmed that both dietary and housekeeping used the dumpsters. The FSD garbage was to be placed in the facility's dumpster and dumpster lids were to be kept closed. The FSD confirmed that the area surrounding the dumpster was to be maintained in a sanitary manner. 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (e)(2.1) Management

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the facility's infection control tracking logs and policy, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a comprehensive program to monitor the development and spread of infections within the facility and plan preventative measures accordingly and failed to ensure the consistent implementation of infection control procedures designed to prevent the potential for the spread of infection during the medication administration for two out of two medication carts (North and South). Findings include: A review of the facility's infection control policy, last reviewed October 20, 2023, provided by the facility during the survey of February 29, 2024, revealed that the facility will maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. The facility assures that there is an infection control program that is effective for investigation, controlling and preventing infections. This facility will assign an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility did not have one or more individuals serving as the Infection Preventionist (IP) responsible for the facility's infection prevention plan. Findings included: A review of the facility's infection control policy, last reviewed October 20, 2023, provided by the facility during the survey of February 29, 2024, revealed that the facility will maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. The facility assures that there is an infection control program that is effective for investigation, controlling and preventing infections. This facility will assign an infection control coordinator to collect data, monitor and analyze and make recommendations. This data will be submitted to the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee. Interview with the nursing home administrator (NHA) on February 27, 2024, at approximately 8:45 AM, revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate that it had ascertained if a resident had an advance directive upon admission and whether the resident would like information to formulate an advance directive for three of 13 sampled residents (Residents 2, 13, and 21). The findings include: Review of facility's Advance Directives policy last reviewed by the facility October 20, 2023, indicated that an advance directive is a written instruction such as a living will or durable power of attorney for healthcare, recognized under state law, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated. The document expresses wishes about treatment preferences and the designation of a surrogate if the patient is incapacitated. The facility process includes that the social worker will meet with the resident/family upon admission, quarterly, annually, and as needed to review (advance directives). A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a clean and homelike resident environment on two of two nursing units (North and South nursing units) and failed to ensure comfortable water temperatures including three residents out of the 13 sampled (Residents 13, 21, and 25), and three out of the six residents interviewed during a resident group interview (Residents 5, 23, and 28). Findings Include: An observation of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on February 27, 2024, at 8:45 AM revealed the white window blinds were bent and missing fins. A dirt buildup was visible on the window sill between the window and the screen. During an interview on February 27, 2024, at 8:52 AM, Resident 21 stated that he gets a draft in his room through drill holes that are utilized to hold the air-conditioning unit in place during the summer months. Resident 21 explained that he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of three residents out of 13 sampled (Residents 3, 22, and 12). Findings include: According to the RAI User's Manual dated October 2023, Section A 1500 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) is to be completed if the type of assessment is an admission assessment, significant change or annual assessment. The annual MDS Assessment of Resident 3 dated December 8, 2023, revealed Section A 1500 was coded as 0 indicating that the resident was not considered by the State to require a Level II PASRR process, to have serious mental illness, and/or intellectual disability or mental retardation or a related condition. A review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed a Level I PASRR was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy and controlled drug records and observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement pharmacy procedures to promote accurate administration, and records accounting for controlled drugs for five of eight residents sampled (Resident 13, 7, 24, 19, and 8), and reconciliation of controlled drugs on one of two medication carts (North). Finding include: A review of the facility policy Medication ordering, receiving, and storage (Controlled Substance), and Medication Storage in the facility (ID3: Controlled medication storage) last reviewed by the facility October 20, 2023, stated nursing staff must count controlled medications at the end of each shift. The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty will make the count together. They must document and report any discrepancies to the director of nursing services. The director or designee investigates and makes every reasonable effort to reconcile all reported discrepancies. If a major…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's abuse policy, select facility investigation reports, and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure one resident out of 13 sampled was free from misappropriation of resident property, medication (Resident 13). Findings included: A review of the facility Abuse Protection Policy last reviewed October 20, 2023, revealed that the residents have the right to be free from verbal, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect, and misappropriation of property. abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. Further it is indicated misappropriation is the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's permission. A review of the clinical record review revealed that Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include congestive heart failure and depression. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select facility investigations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely develop a person-centered care plan to address a resident's high risk for falls and meet the safety needs of one resident out of 13 sampled (Resident 10). Findings include: A clinical record review revealed that Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination) and schizophrenia (a chronic mental health disorder that involves problems with cognition, behavior, and emotions). A review of an annual comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated April 7, 2023, revealed a care area assessment (CAA- process provides guidance on how to focus on key issues identified during a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record and select facility policy review, and staff interview it was revealed that the facility failed to monitor weight and evaluate nutritional and hydration requirements to ensure acceptable parameters of nutritional status are maintained to the extent possible for one resident out of 13 sampled (Resident 2). Findings include: Review of the facility Resident Weights policy last reviewed October 20, 2023, indicated that weights must be obtained routinely to monitor the parameters of nutrition over time, and identify residents at risk for significant weight change. Upon admission/readmission, the resident will be weighed each day for two days. The first weight will be within 24 hours of admission or readmission. After admission weights are obtained, the individual will be weighed weekly for four weeks. After the first 4 weeks, the interdisciplinary team will determine the need for continuation of weekly weights or a change to monthly weights. All weights will be transcribed (including weekly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of select facility policy and clinical records, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were labeled according to accepted labeling requirements for one of five residents sampled (Resident 8). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy Disposition of Medications last reviewed by the facility October 20, 2023, indicated it is the policy to establish guidance for the disposition of medications to implement safe and responsible disposition practices of discontinues medications in order to protect residents and staff from improper diversion or accidental exposure. Medications discontinues by prescriber order, are destroyed onsite with disposition being reported on a paper form which is then scanned into the electronic medical record. Medications are removed from the medication cart immediately upon receipt of an order to discontinue in an effort to avoid inadvertent administration. A review of Resident 8's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of select facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility did not have one or more individuals serving as the Infection Preventionist (IP) responsible for the facility's infection prevention plan. Findings included: A review of the facility's infection control policy, provided by the facility during the survey of October 26, 2023, revealed that the facility will maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. The facility assures that there is an infection control program that is effective for investigation, controlling and preventing infections. This facility will assign an infection control coordinator to collect data, monitor and analyze and make recommendations. This data will be submitted to the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee. Interview with the nursing home administrator (NHA) on October 26, 2023, at approximately 12:45 PM, revealed that the facility had been without an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of grievances lodged with the facility, the schedule of the facility's activities staff and activities programming and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the needs, interests, and preferences of two out of 8 sampled residents (Residents 18 and 21) Findings include: Review of grievance submitted by Resident 18 dated October 7, 2023, revealed that the resident was very upset that the Activity Director was not present in activities. The grievance further indicated that the resident was weepy at times and that she was bored. Resident 18 questioned if it was something the resident did wrong. Comfort and emotional support were provided at the time the resident's concern was expressed. Review of grievance submitted by Resident 21 dated October 8, 2023, revealed that the resident was very upset, there are no activities in the morning. The resident stated I don't even want to get out of bed anymore. I have nothing to look forward to. The resident stated that she was going to tell her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of grievances lodged with the facility and the schedules of the employees of the facility's activities department and staff interviews it was determined that the facility was not administered in a manner that enables it to uses it staff resources to maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being of each residents causing emotional upset to two of eight residents sampled (Resident 21 and 18). Findings included: Review of grievance submitted by Resident 18 dated October 7, 2023, revealed that the resident was very upset that the Activity Director was not present in activities. The grievance further indicated that the resident was weepy at times and that she was bored. Resident 18 questioned if it was something the resident did wrong. Comfort and emotional support were provided at the time the resident's concern was expressed. Review of grievance submitted by Resident 21 dated October 8, 2023, revealed that the resident was very upset, there are no activities in the morning. The resident stated I don't even want to get out of bed anymore. I have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide person-centered quality care by failing to follow physician orders for medication administration and accurately monitor bowel activity and administration of the bowel protocol as prescribed for one resident out of seven 7 sampled (Resident 11). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include, stiff-man syndrome (a rare autoimmune neurological disorder that most commonly causes muscle stiffness and painful spasms that come and go and can worsen over time.) and chronic pain. The resident had physician orders dated August 28, 2023, for MS Contin (an opioid medication for pain) 15 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times a day (8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.) for chronic pain, and Pregabalin (Lyrica- used to treat pain caused by nerve damage) 75 mg by mouth two times a day (9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.) for chronic pain. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-04-20 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — widespread
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate an effective maintenance program of regular inspection of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails to assure that the mattress fit the bed frames properly limiting entrapment zones and promoting resident comfort and safety for 21 resident beds with side rails and further failed to ensure the availability of a functioning bed for all current licensed and certified resident beds (Resident rooms [ROOM NUMBER]). Findings include: Observations on April 20, 2023, at approximately 9:30 AM confirmed that side rails were in use on the residents' beds in Resident Rooms which included: Q3-1, Q7-1, Q7-2, 8-1, 8-2, 9-2, Q10-1, Q10-2, 11-2, 12-1, 14-1, 14-3, 15-2, 17-1, 17-2, 18-2, 19-2, 20-1, 21-2, 23-1, and 23-1. Side rails were in use on each resident bed noted. Interview with the administrator on April 20, 2023 at approximately 11:00 AM failed to provide documented evidence to demonstrate regular inspections of bed frames,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-20 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of three resident out of 14 sampled (Resident 9, 34, and 12). Findings include: The Significant change MDS Assessment of Resident 9, dated October 7, 2022, revealed that Section A 1500 was coded as 0 indicating that the resident was not considered by the State to require a Level II PASRR admission screening process, to have serious mental illness, and/or intellectual disability or mental retardation or a related condition. (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review {PASARR} is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. PASARR requires that 1) all applicants to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility be evaluated for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-20 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level II determination and the PASRR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 12 and 4). Findings include: Review of clinical record of Resident 12 revealed diagnoses to include schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly) and bipolar disorder (a mental condition with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). Further review of Resident 12's clinical record revealed a PASARR Level I (federally required assessment to help ensure that all individuals with serious mental disorders and/or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) dated March 17, 2023, with the following outcome: Individual has a positive screen for Serious Mental Illness, Intellectual Disability, and/or Other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-20 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of select facility policy and clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to assess a resident's potential need for bed rails, including the risk for entrapment and a review of the risks versus benefits with the resident and/or the resident's representative for one of four sampled residents (Resident 36). Findings include: A review of the facility policy Use of Side Rails reviewed by the facility December 19, 2022, indicated Side rails may be used as resident mobility aids and the use of side rails as restraints will not be used unless necessary to treat a resident's medical symptom. Residents must be assessed for entrapment risk from bed rails prior to use of side rails. Guidelines for the policy included: Side rails are considered a restraint when they are used to limit the resident's freedom of movement (prevent the resident from leaving his/her bed). (Note: the side rails may have the effect of restraining one individual but not another,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-20 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — pattern
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to provide therapeutic and medically related social services to promote the psychosocial well-being of one of two residents reviewed for discharge planning (Resident 6), coordination of required mental health services for two of three residents (Resident 12 and 4) and assisting and arranging to meet a resident's communication needs for one resident out of 14 sampled (Resident 32). Findings include: According to long term care regulatory guidelines, examples of medically-related social services include: o §483.15, Transitions of Care, §483.20, Resident Assessments (PASARR), and §483.21, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning; o Assisting or arranging for a resident's communication of needs through the resident's primary method of communication or in a language that the resident understands; o Making referrals and obtaining needed services from outside entities o Transitions of care services (e.g., assisting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-20 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records and facility documentation and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide a Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage and for the appeal process for one of three records reviewed. (Resident 19). Finding include: A review of the form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123, (a notice that informs the recipient when care receive from skilled nursing facility is ending and how you can contact a Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) to appeal) revealed instructions that a Medicare provider must ensure that the notice is delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare covered services end. The provider must ensure that the beneficiary or their representative signs and dates the NOMNC to demonstrate that the beneficiary or their representative received the notice and understands the termination of services can be disputed. Review of the list of discharged residents, provided by the facility, from a Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining in the past six months revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-20 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notice of facility initiated transfer to the hospital identifying the reason for the transfer in a language and manner easily understand by one resident (Resident 9) and failed to provide written notice of the facility initiated transfer to the hospital to the resident's representative for one resident out of six sampled (Resident 34). Findings include: A review of Resident 9's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on March 2, 2023, and returned to the facility on March 30, 2023. The identified reason for the resident's transfer was noted as low hemoglobin (A hemoglobin test measures the amount of hemoglobin in your blood. Hemoglobin is a protein in your red blood cells that carries oxygen to your body's organs and tissues and transports carbon dioxide from your organs and tissues back to your lungs. If a hemoglobin test reveals that your hemoglobin level is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records and resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized discharge plan for one of two residents reviewed for discharge planning (Resident 6). Findings Include: A review of Resident 6's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on August 19, 2022, with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (chronic condition in which the heart does not pump as well as it should) and depression. During interview with Resident 6 on April 18, 2023, at 10:00 AM the resident stated that he was satisfied at the facility, but if possible, would like to transfer to a facility, which allowed smoking. There was no evidence of the resident's discharge plans or assessment of the resident's potential for discharge to lesser level of care, identification of the resident's discharge goals or if the resident's placement was long term. Review of Resident 6's current plan of care, in effect at the time of the survey ending April 20, 2023, revealed no documented evidence of the resident's discharge goals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and interviews with staff and resident it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide a functional communication system to maintain the resident's ability to communicate for one resident with communication needs out of 14 sampled residents (Resident 32). Findings included: An admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted at specific intervals to plan a resident's care) dated March 10, 2023, revealed Resident 32 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14 (Brief Interview for Mental Status - a tool to assess cognitive function - a score of 13-15 indicates cognitively intact) and that the resident's preferred language was Spanish. A review of clinical record revealed that Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include diabetes, anxiety, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). A nurses' note dated March 3,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services planned to maintain the functional abilities and declines in range of motion for one of three sampled residents (Resident 22). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Hemiplegia (in its most severe form, complete paralysis of half of the body) and Hemiparesis (unilateral paresis, is weakness of one entire side of the body) following cerebral infarction (or stroke, is a brain lesion in which a cluster of brain cells die when they don't get enough blood) affecting the left non dominant side. An occupational therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE], indicated that Resident 22 was to wear a left had orthotic (splint or brace) at bedtime to prevent further contracture and manage tone. A Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) was to be established for the splint. There was no documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and select incident reports and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the provision of necessary supervision during meals to promote resident safety while eating as required by one resident out of 14 residents sampled Findings include: A review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed that she was admitted to the facility February 12, 2020, with diagnoses to include dementia, anxiety, protein - calorie malnutrition, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and malignant neoplasm of the larynx, and tongue. A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) dated January 31, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14 (Brief Interview for Mental Status - a tool to assess cognitive function - a score of 13-15 indicates cognitively intact), and required staff supervision with eating, with one person…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures and clinical records, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide supplemental oxygen administration care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 31). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Oxygen Administration, last reviewed December 19, 2022, revealed that the first step in the procedure for oxygen administration is to verify the physician's order. Observation of Resident 31 on April 18, 2023, at 11:12 a.m. revealed the resident was in his room with supplemental oxygen in place via an oxygen concentrator (bedside machine that concentrates ambient air to supply an oxygen-rich gas stream) with the liter flow set at 2.0 liters per minute (l/m). Observation of Resident 31 on April 19, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. revealed the resident was in his room with supplemental oxygen in place via an oxygen concentrator with liter flow set at 5.0 liters per minute (l/m). Clinical record review for Resident 31 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0713 — isolated
    Provide or arrange emergency care by a doctor 24 hours a day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policy and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the provision of consistent and timely physician services for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 19). Findings include: A review of facility policy entitled Protocol - when to call the physician or physician extender, last reviewed by the facility December 19, 2022, the physicians caring for residents in your facility want to respond in an appropriate and timely manner to changes in condition. Types of situations which frequently arise which require physician notification includes pain. The nursing staff is expected to notify the physician based on the urgency of the situation as outlined in the accompanying chart and in the following time frame: Emergency - Notify the physician at the time of the event. The physician is expected to respond within 30 minutes. A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 19 was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observations and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide, or secure, dental services for one resident out of 14 sampled (Resident 4). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly) and bipolar disorder (a mental condition with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). Observation and interview with Resident 4 on April 18, 2023 at approximately 9:30 AM revealed that the resident expressed concerns about his teeth and stated that he has multiple cavities. When the resident smiled, darkened areas, that appeared to be cavities, were observed on the resident's front bottom teeth. An admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated that Resident 4 had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. Review of the CAA (care assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed timely ascertain a resident's eligibility to receive the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations and provide immunization if eligible as desired by one of five residents reviewed (Resident 15). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's consent form for the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations was signed by the resident on December 5, 2022, noting that the resident wanted to receive both the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines unless medically contraindicated. However, until surveyor inquiry at the time of the survey on April 19, 2023, the facility had not consulted with the resident's resident's physician to determine any possible medical contraindications for the resident's immunizations. Interview with the Director of Nursing on April 20, 2023, at approximately 9:30 a.m. confirmed that Resident 15 consented to receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and space measurements provided by the facility, it was determined the facility failed to provide the regulatory required minimum square footage in nine of 21 resident rooms. Findings include: Observations made on Janaury 14, 2025, at 9:30 AM, revealed square footage was not adequate in the following resident rooms: room [ROOM NUMBER] is a single-bedded resident room, which requires a minimum of 100 square feet. The square footage of this room measured 85 square feet. Resident rooms 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 23 are two- bedded resident rooms with square footage measurements of only 143 square feet. These multi-bed rooms failed to provide the minimum square footage requirement of 80 square feet per bed, or a total of 160 square feet in a semi-private room. CFR 483.90(d)(1)(ii) Bedrooms 28 Pa. Code: 205.20 (d)(f) Resident bedrooms

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records and facility documentation, and an interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required advance notice, through a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (CMS 10123-NOMNC), regarding the termination of Medicare services for one of the three residents sampled (Resident 26). Findings include: A review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123 revealed that the NOMNC must be delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare-covered services end or on the second to last day of service if care is not being provided daily. A clinical record review revealed Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A clinical record review revealed that the facility provided Resident 26's representative with a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (CMS 10123-NOMNC) letter dated November 9, 2023. The notice indicated that Medicare would likely not pay for the resident's skilled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records and written transfer notices, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a written notice of a facility initiated hospital transfer of the resident was provided to the resident and the resident's representative for one resident out of five residents sampled (Resident 12). The findings include: Regulatory requirements indicate that before a facility transfers or discharges a resident, the facility must notify the resident and the resident's representative of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. A review of Resident 12's clinical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on November 15, 2023, and returned to the facility on November 20, 2023. Clinical record review revealed no evidence that a written notice was provided to Resident 12 and the resident representative regarding the resident's transfer to the hospital on November 15, 2023, which included the required the reason for the transfer, contact and address…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and space measurements provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the regulatory required minimum square footage in nine of 21 resident rooms. Findings include: Observations made on February 27, 2024, 9:00 AM, revealed square footage was not adequate in the following resident rooms: room [ROOM NUMBER] is a single-bedded resident room, which requires a minimum of 100 square feet. The square footage of this room measured 85 square feet. Resident rooms 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 23 are two- bedded resident rooms with square footage measurements of only 143 square feet. These multi-bed rooms failed to provide the minimum square footage requirement of 80 square feet per bed, or a total of 160 square feet in a semi-private room. CFR 483.70(d)(1)(ii) Bedrooms 28 Pa. Code: 205.20 (d)(f) Resident bedrooms

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-04-20 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and space measurements provided by the facility, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the regulatory required minimum square footage in nine of 21 resident rooms. Findings include: Observations made on April 18, 2023 at 8:30 AM, revealed square footage was not adequate in the following resident rooms: room [ROOM NUMBER] is a single-bedded resident room, which requires a minimum of 100 square feet. The square footage of this room measured 85 square feet. Resident rooms 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 23 are two- bedded resident rooms with square footage measurements of only 143 square feet. These multi-bed rooms failed to provide the minimum square footage requirement of 80 square feet per bed, or a total of 160 square feet in a semi-private room. CFR 483.70(d)(1)(ii) Bedrooms 28 Pa. Code: 205.20 (d)(f) Resident bedrooms

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$86,122 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $22,639 — penalty dated 2025-04-17
  • $63,483 — penalty dated 2024-02-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to KADIMA HEALTHCARE GROUP — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.8+1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CIBC BANK USAOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/06/2025
KADIMA HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/29/2018
PINNACLE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
ARMSON, DYLANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/18/2025
HARKINS, ANDREAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/15/2025
LOWDEN, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
MORRIS, DANIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/29/2018
STRAUSS, JONATHANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/29/2018
STRYCZYNSKI, TRACYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/30/2024
LUZERNE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/29/2018
MARTIN FRIEDMAN CPA PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
PEARLSTEIN, ROBERTIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-25.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$140K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 5%Other / private 17%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $140K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$355per resident / day
operating cost
$10,805per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$283per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395484. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next