No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Campbelltown

2880 Horseshoe Pike, Palmyra, PA 17078 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 53 certified beds · (717) 838-2231 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Jun 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (74) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (84%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
616 W Main St · (717) 746-0645 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
22 E Main St · (717) 838-1300 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
110 Northside Commons · (717) 838-2062 · Call to confirm hours
Park
196 Woodlawn Ave · (717) 269-5810 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2801 Horseshoe Pike · (717) 389-5447

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.9%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.3%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.7%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.9%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened26.8%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.1%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine33.3%93.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers12.6%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.1%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.8%17.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.8%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine8.6%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.1%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.2%9.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.021.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.221.181.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
30.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 30.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.3%CMS range 33.1–65.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 6.9–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge30.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge39.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.6–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.691.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.87
RN hours/ resident / day
0.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.32
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.74
RN hoursweekends
84.1%
Total nursing turnover
92.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 53 beds and averages 50.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 84% is well above the national median of 45%. 4 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

22
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-06)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

74 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 62 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary supervision and services for a resident who had a history of suicidal ideation (thoughts centered around death or suicide) and attempted suicide for one of five sampled residents. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. (Resident 1) Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that the environment was free from accident hazards in a resident room (Resident 2) and on the nursing unit. Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Suicide Threats, last reviewed September 19, 2024, revealed that resident threats of suicide would be reported immediately to the charge nurse/supervisor. Staff was to remain with the resident until the charge nurse/supervisor arrived to assess the resident. The resident was to be placed on one-to-one observation until the episode resolved if they were capable of self-injury. The one-to-one observation was to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-04-21 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide behavioral health services for one of five residents reviewed which resulted in multiple lacerations to the neck from a suicide attempt, actual harm, to the resident. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included suicide attempt, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety, bipolar disorder, agoraphobia (an anxiety disorder that causes a fear of places or situations that cause panic and a fear of being trapped or helpless) with panic disorder, and insomnia. Review of hospital records dated November 5 and 8, 2024, revealed that the resident was at risk for suicide and required one to one supervision during the hospital admission. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident was at risk for mood problems due to suicide attempts prior to admission. The intervention was for behavioral health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-21 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a full-time qualified dietary services manager in the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian. Findings include:In an interview conducted on March 21, 2026, at 10:44 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that there was not a full-time dietitian employed at the facility and that the facility did not employ a qualified dietary manager in the absence of a full-time dietitian. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management.42 CFR S483.60(a)(2) Qualified Dietary StaffPreviously cited 6/6/25

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a safe, clean, and comfortable environment was maintained on one of one nursing units.Observation on July 30, 2024, at 10:15 a.m., 11:51 a.m., and 12:20 p.m., revealed black residue throughout the floors of rooms 3, 5, 6, 21, 23, 27, 29, 36, and the bath across from the nurse's station. In an interview on July 30, 2025, at 11:52 a.m., Resident 3 stated the equipment in the facility was rusty. In an interview on July 30, 2025, at 12:00 p.m., Resident 6 stated that housekeeping staff do not clean and only dispose of trash. 28 Pa. Code 207.2(a) Administrator's responsibility.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify each resident's physician and responsible party of a change in condition for one of three sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Protocol - When to call the physician or physician extender, revealed that nursing staff were to make an assessment and notify the physician of changes in condition, including abnormal vital signs. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included congestive heart failure and bradycardia (slow heart rate). Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment. In an interview on June 23, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., Resident 1 stated that she went to the hospital on June 16, 2025, around 10:30 p.m Review of the resident's clinical record revealed a nurse's note dated June 17, 2025, at 3:35 a.m., stating that the resident was away at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications in accordance with physician orders for three of 12 sampled residents. (Residents 3, 9, 10) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 3 had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diabetes. A review of Resident 3's current Medication Administration Record (MAR) for June 2025, revealed that staff were to administer the following medications at 9:00 a.m. daily: Allopurinol 100 milligrams (mg) (a gout medication), ferrous sulfate 325 mg (iron), glipizide 2.5 mg (diabetic medication), fluticasone-umeclidinium-vilanterol one puff (COPD inhaler), cyanocobalamin (vitamin B12) 500 micrograms (mcg), cholecalciferol (vitamin D) 4000 international units (IU), bumetanide 3 mg (diuretic), apixaban 5 mg (blood thinner), ipratropium-albuterol solution 3 milliliter (COPD mist inhaler), lansoprazole 30 mg (stomach acid reducing medication), and probiotic one capsule. Staff were to administer insulin glargine 30 units at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and a review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in accordance with resident preference and plan of care due to insufficient staffing. Findings include: Clinical record review revealed Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included difficulty in walking and weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident 18 was alert and oriented. Review of the care plan revealed Resident 18 required assistance from staff with transferring. In an interview on June 3, 2025, at 12:19 p.m., Resident 18 stated she wanted to get out of bed on Sunday but could not because there was not enough staff. Review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed a lack of documentation that she was transferred out of bed on Sunday. Review of the facility staffing documentation for Sunday, June 1, 2025, revealed the facility failed to meet the required Nurse Aide ratios,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility personnel files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that licensed nursing staff demonstrated competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs. Findings include: In an interview on June 6, 2025, at 9:23 a.m. the Administrator confirmed that the facility did not conduct any in-service training or skills competency evaluations for licensed nursing staff. 28 Pa. Code 201.20(a)(b) Staff development. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-06 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility personnel files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides received annual education necessary to care for residents' needs. Findings include: In an interview on June 6, 2025, at 9:23 a.m. the Administrator confirmed that the facility did not conduct any in-service training or skills competency evaluations for nurse aides. 28 Pa. Code 201.20(a)(b) Staff development. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a full-time, qualified dietary services manager in the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian. Findings include: During an interview on June 3, 2025, at 11:43 a.m., the Director of dining stated that the facility did not employ a certified dietary manager or a full-time qualified dietitian. In an interview on June 6, 2025, at 12:57 p.m., the Administrator confirmed that there was not a full-time dietitian employed onsite at the facility and there were no regularly scheduled consultations with a qualified dietitian in the absence of a qualified certified dietary manager. CFR 483.60 (a)(2) Staffing Previously cited 12/17/24 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions in the kitchen and on the nursing unit. Findings include: Observations in the kitchen on June 3, 2025, at 10:27 a.m., revealed the following: There was an accumulation of debris, which included food particles, under the dish machine. There were flies in the dishwashing area. There was a disconnected hose on the back of the ice machine that was leaking water onto the floor. There was an accumulation of water on the floor under the hose. The floor under the clean dish racks was dirty with an accumulation of debris. The inside of the microwave was soiled with various colored substances. There was an accumulation of dust on the grate cover of the juice machine. There was a bin of sugar with a measuring cup stored inside of the bin, in contact with the sugar. There was an open box of orange apple juice that was connected to the hose for the juice machine. The box was bulging and stained. The box of juice was dated March 6, there was no year noted. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Committee failed to meet on a quarterly basis. Findings include: Review of the facility documentation revealed no record that the facility's Quality Assurance Committee had met since January 2024. In an interview on June 5, 2025, at 11:59 a.m., the Administrator confirmed that there was no record that the facility's Quality Assurance Committee had met. CFR 483.75(g) Quality assessment and assurance. Previously cited 7/18/24 28 Pa code 201.18(b)(3) Management.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 62 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow policies and procedures to prevent the spread of infection for three of 19 sampled residents. (Residents 28, 38, 201) In addition, the facility failed to have a documented water management program for Legionella. Failure to have a water management program had the potential to affect 45 of 45 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revealed that enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were to be used with any resident with a wound or indwelling medical device during encounters when contact was expected, including during wound care and the care of feeding tubes. Precautions included the use of protective gowns and gloves during high-contact care activities. Observations made during all days of the survey revealed none of the residents with chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices had signs posted to indicate that personal protective equipment (PPE) was required and no PPE was observed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-06 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program in the kitchen and on the nursing unit. Findings include: Observations in the kitchen on June 3, 2025, at 10:27 a.m. and 12:05 p.m., revealed flies in the dishwashing and food preparation areas. Observations on the nursing unit on June 3, 2025, from 10:28 a.m. through 12:40 p.m., revealed flies in resident rooms [ROOM NUMBER], at the nurses station, and in the resident shower room. Observations on the nursing unit on June 4, 2025, from 10:10 a.m. through 1:00 p.m., revealed flies in resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], and in the hallway by the food cart that was holding resident meal trays during the tray service. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3)(e)(2.1) Management

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-06 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, resident group interviews, review of facility grievance forms, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to act promptly upon resident grievances. Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled, Grievance Policy, revealed that the reasonable timeframe the resident could expect a completed review of a grievance was within five days. The grievance official would issue written grievance decisions to the resident. The written grievance decision would include a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance, and the date the written decision was issued. During a confidential group interview conducted on June 4, 2025, at 1:30 p.m., six of 12 residents reported that the facility did not act promptly upon resident grievances. Review of resident grievance forms revealed that grievances were completed and submitted on the following dates: December 31, 2024, February 3, 2025 (three grievances for this date), March 26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-06 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative of the bed hold and transfer, including the reasons for the move, and Ombudsman information, in writing upon transfer from the facility for seven of seven sampled residents who were transferred to the hospital. (Residents 21, 31, 36, 38, 39, 49, 201) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 21 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE], after a change in condition. There was no documentation to support that the resident's representative was provided written information regarding a bed hold or the transfer to the hospital. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 31 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE], after a change in condition. There was no documentation to support that the resident's representative was provided written information regarding a bed hold or the transfer to the hospital. Clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess and document the status of wounds or provide physician ordered treatments to prevent new or worsened pressure ulcers for six of six sampled residents with wounds. (Residents 9, 24, 28, 36, 38, 201) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Skin and Wound Management Policy, last revised April 3, 2025, revealed that residents identified with skin impairments, their wound status would be assessed and documented in the electronic medical record, on the Wound Evaluation Flow Record by the Registered Nurse; for residents followed by contracted wound physician services or wound clinic physician, the facility would utilize the physician wound progress note to monitor wound status in addition to the in house Registered Nurse assessment. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 9 had diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis and adult failure to thrive. Review of wound consultation notes revealed that the resident had a stage four pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor and assess the nutritional status for seven of seven sampled residents at nutritional risk. (Residents 2, 9, 13, 18, 24, 28, and 38) Findings include: Review of the faiclity policy entitled, Nutrition Management, revealed that the facility would view bilateral edema and muscle wasting as potential indicators for malnutrition. The facility would also consider depression, dementia, and therapeutic and mechanically altered diets as potential risk factors for malnutrition. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnosis that included diabetes and feeding difficulties. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment and required supervision or touching assistance with eating. Review of the current care plan revealed Resident 2 had a nutritional problem with an intervention to monitor and record weights. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff provided services consistent with professional standards, including monitoring and ongoing communication, for two of two sampled residents receiving dialysis (process of removing excess toxins and water from the blood). (Residents 24, 28) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Hemodialysis Policy and Procedure, revealed a communication notebook with relevant information regarding the resident's medication, condition, and treatment would be shared between the facility and the dialysis provider. In addition, nursing staff would check the access site to ensure appropriate function, prevent infection, and prevent coagulation (blood clotting) at the site each shift. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 24 had a diagnosis of end stage renal disease which required dialysis. Review of the resident's dialysis communication forms revealed no evidence that staff had completed and obtained dialysis communication forms with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pharmacy recommendations were reviewed by the physician in a timely manner for four of five sampled residents. (Residents 14, 24, 44, 47) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Pharmacy Services, revealed that a licensed pharmacist would review the drug regimen of each resident at least once per month. The pharmacist would report any irregularities to the attending physician, the Director of Nursing, and the Medical Director. The reports would be acted upon, signed off, and addressed in the physician's progress note. Clinical record review revelaed that Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that inlcuded schizoaffective disorder, intermittent explosive disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. Review of monthly drug regimen reviews revealed that the pharmacist made recommendations regarding Resident 14's medications on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility documentation, resident interview, staff interview, and results of a test tray audit, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature on the nursing unit. Findings include: Review of the facility's Meal Test Tray, form revealed that hot foods were to be above 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) when served. In an interview on June 3, 2025, at 11:30 a.m., resident 28 stated that the food was often served cold. A test tray conducted on June 4, 2025, at 12:36 p.m., on the nursing unit, revealed mixed vegetables at a service temperature of 116.6 degrees F. The Director of dining stated that the hot foods should be served at a temperature of 135-140 degrees F. In an interview during the lunch meal on June 4, 2025, at 12:43 p.m., Resident 201 stated that the mixed vegetables were cold when served. 28 Pa. Code 201.14 Responsibility of licensee.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to assess a resident for a physical restraint and conduct an on-going assessment of a restraint for one of 19 sampled residents. (Resident 3) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Physical Restraints, revealed that the need for restraints would be reevaluated monthly and that the interdisciplinary assessment team would develop a comprehensive care plan for the resident. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 3 had diagnoses that included severe intellectual disabilities, anxiety, and lack of coordination. Observations on June 3, 2025 from 11:28 a.m. through 1:30 p.m., June 4, 2025 from 9:00 a.m. through 1:00 p.m., and on June 5, 2025 from 9:37 a.m. through 12:30 p.m., revealed Resident 3 in her wheelchair with a seat belt intact. In an interview on June 5, 2025, at 11:31 a.m., Nurse Aide 1 stated Resident 3 could not self remove the seat belt. There was no documented evidence that the facility obtained a physician's order or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one of 19 sampled residents. (Resident 28) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 28 had diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, diabetes, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Resident 28's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated December 19, 2023, for dialysis three time per week. Review of Resident 28's MDS dated [DATE], did not indicate that Resident 28 was dependent on renal dialysis. In an interview on June 5, 2025, at 9:57 a.m., the Administrator confirmed Resident 28's MDS was inaccurate. CFR 483.20(g) Accuracy of Assessments Previously cited 7/18/24

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a Preadmission Screening to identify a mental disorder for one of 19 sampled residents. (Resident 14) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included borderline personality disorder, schizoaffective disorder, intermittent explosive disorder, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety. There was a lack of evidence that the facility completed or obtained a Preadmission Screening for Resident 14. In an interview on June 6, 2025, at 11:37 a.m., the Administrator confirmed that there was a lack of evidence that the facility completed or obtained a Preadmission Screening for Resident 14.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain adequate grooming and hygiene, and assistance with eating for one of 19 sampled residents. (Resident 9) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 9 had diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis, muscle weakness, adult failure to thrive, and dysphagia. Review of the care plan revealed that staff were to check the resident's nail length, trim, and clean on bath day and as necessary, and report to the nurse with any changes. On June 3, 2025, at 1:44 p.m., the resident was observed in her room. Her nails were long, dirt was observed under the nails. She stated that she preferred her nails to be short, staff have not offered to provide nail care, and she has not refused. On June 5, 2025, at 11:53 a.m., the resident was observed in bed, her nails remained long. She stated that staff had not offered to provide nail care, and she would like her nails to be cut. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident required assistance from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that adequate catheter care was provided for two of two sampled residents with an indwelling urinary catheter. (Residents 24 and 31) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Urinary Catheter Care, last revised January 31, 2013, revealed that staff would perform perineal care to the resident every eight hours to prevent skin rashes and breakdown, empty the collection bag at least every eight hours and as needed (PRN), cleanse the catheter from the insertion site to approximately four inches outward, and check the drainage tubing and bag to ensure that the catheter was draining properly and kept off of the floor. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 24 had diagnoses that included urogenital implants. The resident required the use of a urinary catheter. On May 1, 2025, a physician's order for foley catheter care every shift was discontinued. There was no new order for catheter care placed and the resident continued with a foley…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that as needed pain medication was administered per the physician's order and that nonpharmacological interventions were attempted prior to the administration of as needed pain medication for one of 19 sampled residents. (Resident 24) Findings inlcude: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 24 had diagnoses that included muscle weakness, low back pain, and neuropathy. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident was on pain medication therapy and that pain medication was to be administered as ordered. A physician's order dated May 5, 2025, directed staff to administer oxycodone (a narcotic pain medication) every four hours as needed for severe pain at pain levels seven through ten. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May 2025, revealed that staff administered the oxycodone when the resident's pain was noted at a level less than seven on 24 occasions in May 2025. Review of a physician's order dated May 31, 2025, directed staff to administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications/biologicals were securely stored in a medication or treatment cart in on one of one nursing units. Findings include: Observations on June 3, 2025, at 12:19 p.m., in Resident 14's revealed a tube of medicated cream on the bed. Clinical record review revealed no assessments for medication self administration or bedside storage of medications. Observations on June 4, 2025, at 8:37 a.m., and on June 5, at 10:15 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., in Resident 43's room revealed two bottles of nasal medications on the bedside table. Clinical record review revealed no assessments for medication self administration or bedside storage of medications. CFR 438.45(H) Storage of Drugs and Biologicals Previously cited 7/18/24 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to treat a fungal infection timely for one of three sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included heart failure and a history of cancer. According to the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated March 20, 2025, the resident was able to clearly communicate and understand others and had no memory impairments. On April 29, 2025, a nurse noted that the resident was examined by an ear, nose, and throat specialist. According to a nurse's note dated May 7, 2025 (a late entry), the specialist's office informed the facility that the resident had a fungal infection in her mouth and required antifungal lozenges (clotrimazole). There was no documented evidence that the resident received the medication until May 12, 2025. In an interview on May 27, 2025, at 12:00 p.m., Resident 1 stated that she had discomfort in her mouth and didn't receive the medicated lozenges until five days after they were ordered by the specialist. 28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records that were accurate for three of five sampled residents. (Residents 3, 4, and 5) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, intermittent explosive disorder, anxiety, depressive disorder, and borderline personality disorder. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident had a problem with mood and the intervention was for staff to obtain behavioral health consultations (consults) as needed. On January 7, 2025, the resident's practitioner noted that she was feeling overwhelmed with placement in a new facility. The practitioner noted that the resident was referred for behavioral health services. On February 3, 2025, staff noted that the resident requested to speak to a mental health provider as she had been feeling manic and depressed. On February 4, 2025, the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment on one of one nursing units. Findings include: On April 17, 2025, from 10:00 a.m. to 3:25 p.m., the following was observed: The right-side swinging glass door of the facility front door is did not open. In the dining room, the interior entrance door handle and windows were dirty with a white substance. There was garbage on the floor under the dining room exterior windows. There was a reddish stain on the door frame of the linen closet across from the nurse station. In the hallway, there was damage on the wall's wallboard and wallpaper at rooms 1, 3, 8, 24, 27, and 30. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the floor was sticky with a black residue between the door and A bed. There was a urine smell. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the floor was sticky with a black residue between the door and the bed. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was a damaged spot on the wall behind the A bed. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the floor was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, facility documentation, clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse or injury of unknown origin to the Administrator/Abuse Prevention Coordinator of the facility and the State Survey Agency for one of six sampled residents. (Resident 6) Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Abuse Reporting and Investigation, last reviewed November 9, 2024, revealed that all suspected or alleged incidents of abuse, neglect, or exploitation would be reported to the Administrator immediately. The State Agency would be notified of the alleged or actual event of abuse within two hours. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 6 had diagnoses that included Parkinsonism. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was not cognitively impaired and needed substantial/maximal staff assistance with showering or bathing. Resident 6 stated in an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for one of six sampled residents. (Resident 6) Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Abuse Reporting and Investigation, last reviewed November 9, 2024, revealed that all suspected or alleged incidents of abuse, neglect, or exploitation would be investigated. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 6 had diagnoses that included Parkinsonism. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was not cognitively impaired and needed substantial/maximal staff assistance with showering or bathing. In an interview on April 17, 2025, at 11:10 a.m Resident 6 reported that on March 28, 2025, two aides treated her in an abusive and humiliating manner during her shower by forcefully removing her clothing, shoving her under first cold, then hot water, and roughly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide behavioral health services for one of three sampled residents with mood and behavior concerns. (Resident 6) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 6 had diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, borderline personality disorder, intermittent explosive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the care plan dated January 21, 2025, revealed the resident had a history of mood problems and used anti-anxiety and anti-depressant medications. The interventions included notification of the resident's physician of mood changes and behavioral problems and referral to behavioral health services as needed. On March 25, 2025, the psychiatric nurse practitioner recommended referral to outpatient mental health therapy for increased anxiety. On April 3, 2025, notes indicated the resident had requested referral to outpatient therapy for increased anxiety. There was no evidence that staff notified the resident's physician of the alteration in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on policy review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility did not have a credentialed Infection Preventionist (IP). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Infection Control, last reviewed August 21, 2023, revealed that the facility staff was to report all infections to the IP, who would then conduct routine surveillance. In an interview on December 17, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., the Administrator stated that the facility did not have staff that was a credentialed Infection Preventionist. CFR 483.80 (b) Infection Preventionist Previously cited 7/18/24 28 Pa. Code 211.10(d) Resident care policies. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-17 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a full-time qualified dietary services manager in the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian. Findings include: In an interview conducted on December 17, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., the Administrator stated that there was not a full-time dietitian employed onsite at the facility and that the facility did not employ a qualified certified dietary manager in the absence of a full-time dietitian. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physcian ordered medication was available from the pharmacy for one of six sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included an open wound of the left lower leg and lymphedema. Review of nursing documentation dated December 4, 2024, revealed that the resident was alert and oriented and able to make her needs known. On December 12, 2024, a physican ordered for staff to administer a narcotic medication, Oxycontin, every 12 hours for pain. Review of the medication administration record for December 2024, revealed that the medication was not administered on December, 14, 15, and 16 for a total of six doses. Further review of nursing documentation revealed that the medication had not been administered due to the medication being unavailable from the pharmacy. 28 Pa Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's meal schedule, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that meals were served at regularly scheduled times in accordance with resident preferences on the nursing unit. Findings include: Review of the facility's meal schedule revealed that the scheduled mealtime for the back hall of the nursing unit was 12:15 p.m., and mealtime for the front hall was 12:30 p.m. During interviews on December 13, 2024, from 9:57 a.m. through 11:31 a.m., Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, stated that they usually received their meals late. Observation of the back hall on December 13, 2024, revealed that Residents 4 and 5 received their lunch trays between 12:45 and 12:59 p.m., over 30 minutes past the scheduled mealtime. Observation of the front hall on December 13, 2024, revealed that Residents 1, 2, 3, and 6, received their lunch trays between 1:14 p.m. and 1:30 p.m., over 44 minutes past the scheduled mealtime. In an interview on December 13, 2024, at 1:26 p.m., the Administrator confirmed that meals were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, review of the facility shower schedule, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services that enhanced each resident's quality of life by offering showers as scheduled for four of seven sampled residents. (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included difficulty walking and muscle weakness. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident required assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the facility shower schedule revealed that the resident was to be offered a shower weekly on Thursdays. In an interview on November 25, 2024, at 11:30 a.m., the resident stated that staff had not offered to provide a shower weekly per her preference. There was no documentation to support that Resident 1 received any showers in November 2024. There were no documented refusals. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that included muscle weakness and anxiety. Review of the care plan revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were implemented for two of seven sampled residents. (Residents 3, 4) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 3 had diagnoses that included protein calorie malnutrition, anemia, and muscle weakness. Review of a wound care consultation dated November 19, 2024, revealed that the resident had a stage three pressure ulcer to her sacrum. A physician's order dated September 26, 2024, directed staff to cleanse the sacral wound with normal saline solution (NSS), apply calcium alginate, and cover with a foam dressing once daily on day shift. Review of the November 2024 treatment administration record (TAR) revealed no evidence that staff provided the treatment as ordered on six of 24 days. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 4 had diagnoses that included muscle weakness, chronic kidney disease, and required hemodialysis. Review of a wound care consultation dated November 19, 2024, revealed that the resident had a non-pressure wound to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of documentation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all required staff persons were in attendance at quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meetings for four of four quarters reviewed. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that QAPI meetings were held on a quarterly basis for three of four quarters between June 2023 through June 2024. Findings include: A review of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee meeting sign-in sheets for the period of July 2023 through June 2024, revealed no documentation of meetings was available for the third quarter 2023, July - September, 2023; first quarter 2024, January - March, 2024; and second quarter 2024, April - June, 2024. The Infection Preventionist was not present for the fourth quarter 2023, October - December, 2023, meeting held on January 18, 2024. In an interview on July 18, 2024, at 11:24 a.m., the interim Administrator confirmed there has been only one QAPI meeting since the last survey in 2023 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on policy review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility did not have a credentialed Infection Preventionist (IP). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Infection Control, last reviewed August 21, 2023, revealed that the facility staff was to report all infections to the IP, who would then conduct routine surveillance. In an interview on July 18, 2024, at 9:30 a.m., the Director of Nursing stated that the facility had no staff that were credentialed infection preventionists. 28 Pa. Code 211.10(d) Resident care policies. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, homelike, and comfortable environment on one of one nursing units. (Skilled Nursing Unit) Findings include: During a tour of the Skilled Nursing Unit on July 16, 2024, between 10:45 a.m. and 1:20 p.m., and again on July 18, 2024, between 10:25 a.m. and 10:50a.m., the following were observed: In the shared bathroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], there was peeling paint on the walls behind and beside the sink. Outside of room [ROOM NUMBER], there was peeling paint on both sides of the doorway. In room [ROOM NUMBER], a black substance covered the floor from the entrance and extended under A bed. The curtain for bed A had a large stain on it. At the nursing station entrance there was a hard piece of wall molding that was peeling off the wall and sticking out into the hallway. In the bathroom across the hallway from the nurses' station, a black substance was noted around the perimeter of the room on the grout lines and tiles adjacent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to document why information was not coded and failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for two of 15 sampled residents. (Residents 17, 24) Findings include: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility RAI User's Manual dated October 2023, which provided instructions and guidelines for completing MDS assessments (federally mandated assessment tool that evaluates a resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems), revealed for section K that if a resident cannot be weighed, the standard no information code should be used and then the reason should be documented on the resident's clinical record. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 17's section K in the MDS assessment dated [DATE], had the no information code entered for height and weight. Review of the clinical record revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet each resident's needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for two of 15 sampled residents. (Residents 17, 46) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included end stage renal disease. The Minimum Date Sat (MDS) Care Area Assessment (CAA) summary dated November 3, 2023, noted that the resident's nutritional status was to be addressed in the care plan. There was no documented evidence that interventions to address Resident 17's nutritional status were included in the current care plan. Clinical record review revealed Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included psychological problems, an enlarged prostate and difficulty walking. The MDS CAA summary dated March 20, 2024, noted that the resident's occasional incontinence was to be addressed in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to schedule a follow-up doctor's appointment for one of 15 sampled residents. (Resident 2) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], following a hospitalization with diagnoses that included a urinary tract infection and diabetes. Resident 2's discharge instructions from the hospital noted the presence of a salivary gland tumor and recommended the resident follow-up with an oncologist. A nurse practitioner's admission note, dated March 4, 2024, noted that Resident 2 had a salivary gland tumor that was most likely cancerous and oncology follow-up was scheduled. Subsequent progress notes by the physician between March 4 and May 20, 2024, continued to note the same information regarding the tumor. There was lack of evidence to support the resident had been evaluated by an oncologist or that an appointment was scheduled. In an interview on July 18, 2024, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess significant weight changes in accordance with facility policy for two of 15 sampled residents. (Residents 2, 24) Findings include: According to the facility policy entitled, Nutrition Management and Weight Policy, last reviewed [DATE], facility staff was to monitor resident weights and report any significant changes (5 percent in a month, 7.5 percent in 3 months, or 10 percent in 6 months) to the dietitian. The dietitian and the interdisciplinary team were to evaluate the weight changes and discuss them at a nutrition meeting. These meeting were to be held at least quarterly. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that included diabetes and heart disease. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance from staff for eating, and had significant weight loss. The Care Area Assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, staff interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services consistent with professional standards of practice and the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for one of three sampled residents receiving dialysis (process of removing excess toxins and water from the blood). (Resident 17) Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled, Hemodialysis, last reviewed August 21, 2023, revealed that all residents receiving hemodialysis would have their access site (a way to reach the blood for hemodialysis) assessed every shift. The nurse was to check the access site for bleeding, signs of infection, and bruit and thrill (sight and sound of blood flow at the site). In an interview on July 17, 2024, at 1:30 p.m., the Director of Nursing stated this access site monitoring by nursing should be documented on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) every shift, that there should be physician's orders for hemodialysis, and that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician acknowledged the pharmacist's recommendations for one of 15 sampled residents. (Resident 17) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 17 had diagnoses that included reflux disease, constipation, and chronic respiratory failure. On March 16, 2024, the consultant pharmacist made recommendations regarding Resident 17's medication regimen that included adding the amount of liquid to add to the Miralax dose, changing the timing of the dose of pantoprazole, and adding the instruction to rinse out mouth after use of albuterol. On May 15, 2024, the consultant pharmacist made a recommendation regarding Resident 17's medication regimen to include a risk versus benefit analysis if the resident was to continue on Montelukast. There was no documented evidence that the attending physician had acknowledged or acted upon the recommendations. In an interview on July 18, 2024, at 12:50 p.m., the interim Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were securely stored in a medication storage room on one of one nursing units. (Skilled Nursing unit) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Medication Storage in the Facility, Storage of Medication, last reviewed August 21, 2023, revealed that drugs and biologicals were to be stored in locked compartments and only persons authorized to administer medications were to have access to locked medications. Controlled substances were to be stored separately from other medications in a designated locked drawer or compartment. Observation of the medication room on the Skilled Nursing unit on July 18, 2024, at 10:49 a.m., revealed that a controlled substance was stored in a locked box inside an unlocked refrigerator and the box was not permanently affixed to the refrigerator wall. The portable medication box contained one bottle with 30 milliliters of Ativan, which is a controlled substance. In an interview on July 18, 2024, at 11:21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer pneumococcal disease vaccines in accordance with facility policy to two of five residents whose vaccines were reviewed. (Residents 26, 34) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Infection Control, last reviewed August 21, 2023, revealed that upon admission, the facility would assess each resident to determine if they had been previously vaccinated for pneumococcal disease and offer the vaccine if the resident had not received it. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no documented evidence that the facility offered a pneumococcal disease vaccine or determined if the resident had received it prior to admission. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no documented evidence that the facility offered a pneumococcal disease vaccine or determined if the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to enhance each resident's quality of life by offering showers as scheduled to three of six sampled residents. (Residents 1, 2, 3) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included congestive heart failure and diabetes mellitus. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was oriented and was dependent on staff assistance for bathing. The resident was to receive a shower once per week on Friday evenings. During an interview on May 2, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., the resident reported that she preferred to take a shower and was not offered the opportunity to do so. Review of documentation in the clinical record revealed that the resident was not offered a shower four of four scheduled times in the past 30 days. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus and depression. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a full-time qualified dietary services manager in the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian. Findings include: During an interview on May 2, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., the Director of Nursing, stated that the facility did not employ a certified dietary manager (CDM). In an interview on May 2, 2024, at 10:11 a.m. Employee 1 stated that there was not a full time registered dietitian at the facility. In an interview on May 2, 2024, at 12:20 p.m. Employee 2 and Employee 3 stated that they were the only staff in the kitchen and neither were a CDM or registered dietitian. There was no evidence that the facility employed a certified dietary manager in the absence of a full time qualified dietitian. CFR. 483.60(a)(1) Staffing. Previously cited 6/28/23 28 Pa. Code 211.6(c) Dietary services. 28 Pa Code 201.18(e)(1)(6) Management.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident interviews, review of facility documentation, observation, and results of a test tray evaluation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and at acceptable temperatures on the nursing unit. Findings include: In interviews on May 2, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. through 1:00 p.m., Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4 stated that food was often served cold. Review of the facility's Meal Test Tray, form revealed that the temperature for the hot entree, starch, and vegetable should be greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit when served. A test tray conducted on May 2, 2024, at 1:10 p.m., on the nursing unit, revealed macaroni and cheese at a service temperature of 121.6 degrees Fahrenheit, and stewed tomatoes at a service temperature of 114.2 degrees Fahrenheit. 28 Pa. Code 201.29(j) Resident rights.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that meals were served at regularly scheduled times in accordance with the resident needs on the nursing unit. Findings include: In an interview on May 2, 2024, Employee 2 stated that meal delivery times on the nursing unit were 12:15 p.m for the first cart and 12:30 p.m. for the second cart. On May 2, 2024, from 11:00 a.m., through 12:05 p.m., Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4 stated that their meals usually arrived late. Observation on the nursing unit, on May 2, 2024, revealed Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4 received their lunch trays at 12:50 p.m. through 1:20 p.m., over 35 minutes past their scheduled meal time. CFR 483.60(f)(1) Frequency of meals. Previously cited 1/14/24

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation it was determined that the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions in the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen during a tour on January 13, 2023, at 10:40 a.m. revealed a case of milk with a sell by date of January 5, 2024, and a gallon of milk with a sell by date of December 30, 2023, in the walk-in refrigerator. The floor of the walk-in refrigerator had various food debris and trash on the floor. In the dry storage area there was food debris and trash on the floor. CFR 483.60 Food Procurement Store/Prepare/Serve-Sanitary. Previously cited 8/30/23 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management. 28 Pa. Code 207.2(A) Administrator's responsibility.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-13 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's meal schedule, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that meals were served at regularly scheduled times in accordance with the resident needs on the nursing unit. Findings include: Review of the facility's meal schedule revealed that the scheduled times for lunch delivery on the nursing unit was 11:15 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. In an interview on January 13, 2024, Employee 1 stated that meal delivery times on the nursing unit was 11:15 a.m for the first cart and 11:30 a.m. for the second cart. On January 13, 2024, from 10:55 a.m., through 12:30 p.m., Residents 1,3, 5, 6, 7, and 8 stated that their meals usually arrived late. Observation on the nursing unit, on January 13, 2024, revealed Residents 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8 received their lunch trays at 12:30 p.m. through 1:10 p.m., over an hour past the scheduled meal delivery times.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to perform infection surveillance in accordance with facility policy. In addition, the facility also failed to develop an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols. Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Infection Control Surveillance, last reviewed August 21, 2023, revealed that the infection control nurse or designee would systematically collect data related to infections. That data would be collected throughout the month and utilized for compiling the monthly infection control report. Review of the facility policy entitled, Prevention, Control and Antibiotic Stewardship, last reviewed August 21, 2023, revealed that the program aimed to improve antibiotic use and frequency with a commitment to quality improvement. During the review of the facility infection control program on August 30, 2023, there was no documented evidence of any infection surveillance or antibiotic stewardship program prior to July…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, review of personnel files, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to document completion of orientation and abuse prevention training for three of five new employees (E2, E4, E5). Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled Abuse Protection, last reviewed August 21, 2023, revealed that the facility mandated that new hires complete a training/orientation program. Training was to be provided at time of hire, annually and as needed. Employee E2 had been working as a dietary aide since May 3, 2023. Review of E2's employee file revealed there was no evidence of an orientation or completion of abuse prevention training. Employee E4 had been working as a registered nurse since July 26, 2023. Review of E4's employee file revealed there was no evidence of an orientation or completion of abuse prevention training. Employee E5 had been working as a nurse aide since July 26, 2023. Review of E5's employee file revealed there was no evidence of an orientation or completion of abuse prevention training. In an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident who wandered (Resident 40) and failed to reassess, implement, and/or monitor safety measures related to smoking, elopment, falls, and injuries (skin tears) for four of 21 sampled residents. (Residents 3, 6, 13, 51) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed Resident 40 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease and psychosis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident 40 had cognitive impairment, needed extensive assistance from staff for transfers, and needed staff supervision with walking. Review of the current care plan revealed the resident had a behavior problem due to wandering and entering other residents rooms and had interventions to distract him with diversions, activities, food, conversation, television or books. The care plan also revealed that Resident 40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor and assess significant weight changes for three of 21 sampled residents. (Residents 3, 6, 50) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Resident Weights, last reviewed August 21, 2023, revealed that the re-weights would be obtained within 72 hours if a weight change was greater than three percent and that the licensed nurse would notify the interdisciplinary team for further assessment if the weight change was significant. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus, dementia, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had cognitive impairment and required supervision with eating. Review of the current care plan revealed that Resident 3 was at nutritional risk due to her cognitive status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, and home-like environment in a resident's room for one of 21 sampled residents reviewed. (Resident 31) Findings include: Observation of Resident 31's room on August 27, 2023, at 11:53 a.m., August 28, 2023, at 1:01 p.m., and August 29, 2023, at 9:35 a.m., revealed a broken electrical outlet cover and holes in the wall between the door and the corner. There were scratches in the paint on the walls and exposed wallboard beneath. The bottom dresser drawer handle was broken. The floor was sticky. In an interview on August 30, 2023, at 11:00 a.m., the Administrator confirmed that the walls required repair and the floor needed to be cleaned. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(2.1) Management

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete assessments to accurately reflect the resident's status for three of 21 sampled residents. (Residents 15, 21, 27) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 15 had diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had an indwelling catheter. Review of the nursing notes revealed that on April 9, 2023, Resident 15's catheter was removed and a Bladder Assessment completed on April 10, 2023, revealed that she had functional incontinence of her bladder. Resident 15 was observed from August 27, through 30, 2023, and she did not have an indwelling catheter. In an interview on August 30, 2023, at 10:44 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident 15's catheter was removed and not in place at the time of the MDS assessment. Clinical record review revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet each resident's needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of 21 sampled residents. (Resident 2) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included anxiety, depression, and hypertension. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Care Area Assessment (CAA) worksheet dated May 20, 2023, noted that the resident's cognitive impairment, psychotropic drug use, urinary incontinence, and potential for rehabilitation of activities of daily living were to be addressed in the care plan. There was no evidence that interventions to address the above areas were included in the current care plan. In an interview on August 30, 2023, at 10:46 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed there was no documented evidence that the above mentioned areas were addressed in Resident 2's current care plan. CFR.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nail care to maintain good foot health for one of 21 sampled residents. (Resident 40) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease and depression. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident required extensive staff assistance for care and was totally dependent on staff for bathing. Observation on August 28, 2023, at 12:00 p.m. revealed that the resident's toenails were long and in need of nail care. Observation on August 30, 2023, at 11:10 a.m. with the Director of Nursing revealed that the resident's toes nails were long and in need of care. During an interview on August 30, 2023, at 11:15 a.m. the Director of Nursing stated that staff were to check residents' toenails and if care was needed, they were to report it so that the podiatrist could be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services to increase or prevent a reduction in range of motion and/or to improve or maintain mobility for two of 21 sampled residents. (Residents 15, 21) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 15 had diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had limitation in range of motion of both legs. Review of an occupational therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was to be discharged to a restorative nursing program to maintain her current level of performance and prevent a decline. Review of the current care plan revealed that Resident 15 was on a restorative nursing program for passive range of motion for both of her legs and staff were to complete the exercises daily. Review of restorative nursing documentation July 31, 2023, through August 29, 2023, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately assess bladder continence to provide services to restore or maintain continence to the extent possible for one of 21 sampled residents. (Resident 2) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Incontinence Management Protocol, last review August 21, 2023, revealed that based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility was to ensure that a resident who was incontinent would be evaluated for appropriate interventions to regain or maintain their ability to control bowel and bladder function and that a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to promote continence. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included anxiety and depression. The Minimum Data Set assessment, dated May 20, 2023, indicated that the resident required supervision from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adaptive equipment to assist with eating meals for one of 21 sampled residents. (Resident 15) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 15 had diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis and dysphagia. On January 28, 2022, the physician ordered for staff to provide Resident 15 with red foam (padded handle) utensils and a plate guard with all meals. The care plan indicated that the resident was to receive red foam utensils and a plate guard at all meals to assist with eating. Observation on August 27, 2023, at 12:40 p.m., revealed that the resident was in the dining room for lunch. She did not have a plate guard or red foam utensils on her meal tray. Observation on August 28, 2023, at 12:45 p.m., revealed that the resident did not receive a plate guard with her lunch meal. In an interview at that time, Resident 15 stated that the red foam utensils and plate guard made it easier for her to eat her meals. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner on the nursing unit. Findings include: Observation of the resident refrigerator at the nurse's station on August 28, 2023, at 12:00 p.m. revealed that there was a container of yogurt with a use by date of July 27, 2023, and a container of milk with a use by date of August 26, 2023. The refrigerator shelves had multiple brown stains and puddles of water on them. CFR. 483.60(i)(2) Food Storage. Previously cited 9/1/22

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-11-26 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post accurate and current staffing information. Findings include: Observation during a tour of the facility on November 25, 2024, at 9:44 a.m., revealed that there was no nurse staffing information posted in the facility. In an interview on November 25, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., the Administrator confirmed there was no nurse staffing information posted in the facility on that date. CFR 483.35(g)(2) Posting Requirements Previously Cited 7/18/2024 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-07-18 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post accurate and current nurse staffing information. Findings include: During a tour of the facility on July 16, 2024, at 9:59 a.m., the staffing information that was posted in the lobby was dated July 2, 2024. During a tour of the facility conducted on July 17, 2024, at 3:00 p.m., the staffing information that was posted in the lobby was dated July 16, 2024. During a tour of the facility conducted on July 18, 2024, at 12:16 p.m., the staffing information that was posted in the lobby was dated July 17, 2024. In an interview on July 18, 2024, at 1:25 p.m., the interim Administrator confirmed that incorrect staffing data was posted. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-07-18 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of transfer(s), including the reasons for the moves, and Ombudsman information, in writing upon transfer from the facility for six of six sampled residents who were transferred to the hospital. (Residents 15, 17, 27, 43, 46, 54) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 15 was transferred to the hospital on June 8, 2024, after a change in condition. There was no documentation to support that the resident and/or the resident's responsible party or legal representative was provided written information regarding the transfer to the hospital. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 17 was transferred to the hospital on April 22, 2024, after a change in condition. There was no documentation to support that the resident and/or the resident's responsible party or legal representative was provided written information regarding the transfer to the hospital. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 27 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-07-18 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy (an agreement for the facility to hold a bed for an agreed rate during a hospitalization) to the resident, family member, or legal representative at the time of the transfer out of the facility for three of six sampled residents with transfers to a hospital. (Residents 27, 46, 54) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that resident 27 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE], after a change in condition. There was no documented evidence that the resident or responsible party was provided written information about the facility's bed-hold policy at the time of the transfer. Clinical record review revealed that resident 46 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE], after a change in condition. There was no documented evidence that the resident or responsible party was provided written information about the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-05-20 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to post accurate and current nurse staffing information. Findings include: During a tour of the facility conducted on May 20, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., there was no nursing staffing information posted in the facility. In an interview at that time, the Director of Nursing stated that the facility does not post its daily staffing information.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-07 for 75 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to KADIMA HEALTHCARE GROUP — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MORRIS, DANIELIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/29/2018
STRAUSS, JONATHANIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/29/2018
CAMPBELLTOWN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/29/2018
CIBC BANK USAOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/06/2025
KADIMA HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/29/2018
PINNACLE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
HARKINS, ANDREAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/15/2025
LOWDEN, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
MOYA, ALEXANDRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/27/2025
SCOTT, LATIFAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2025
MARTIN FRIEDMAN CPA PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
PEARLSTEIN, ROBERTIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$305K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 52%Medicare 5%Other / private 43%

This home reported $305K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$274per resident / day
operating cost
$8,329per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$288per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395846. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next