Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Greenville

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 137.5 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, facility documents, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement sufficient safety precautions to prevent a resident with a history of suicide ideations from inflicting self-harm for one of seven residents reviewed with a history of suicide ideation and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation (Resident R1).Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Suicide Threats dated 4/01/26, indicated that:A staff member must remain with the resident until the nurse supervisor/change nurse arrives to examine the resident.Place the resident on one-on-one observation until the acute episode has been resolved if the resident is physically capable of self-injury.The resident shall remain one-on-one until transfer from the facility or nursing assessment has identified that the resident is no longer a safety risk.The charge nurse or designee shall immediately notify the resident's attending physician, and responsible party of record of such threats.The nurse supervisor will notify the resident's attending…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that active physician orders incorporated resident wishes related to end-of-life care as documented on the resident's Pennsylvania Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a legal document specifying the resident/responsible party choices regarding life-sustaining treatments) for three of 27 residents reviewed (Residents R14, R38, and R50).Findings include: Facility policy entitled Advanced Directives dated [DATE], indicated that All residents shall be presumed as having consented to CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - emergency life-saving procedure that is done when breathing or a heartbeat has stopped and when performed immediately can double or triple chances of survival after cardiac arrest) unless there is documentation in the medical record that the resident has specified that a DNR (Do not attempt resuscitation and allow natural death) order is present on the clinical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to promote cleanliness and help prevent the spread of infection regarding respirator care equipment for two of five residents reviewed (R14 and R50), and failed to obtain a physician's order for the provision of oxygen therapy for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R15). Findings include: Facility policy entitled Medication and Treatment Orders dated 4/21/26, indicated each medication administration will have a corresponding and complete physician's order and oxygen orders will contain: The rate of flow, route, and rationale (i.e., Oxygen 2-3 L/min [liters per minute] per nasal cannula prn [as needed] for SOB [shortness of breath]). Resident R14's clinical record revealed an admission date of 6/20/25, with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a condition that prevents airflow to the lungs resulting in difficulty breathing), Atrial Fibrillation (A-Fib - irregular and often rapid heartbeat that can lead to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy and employee handbook, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with standards for food safety in one of one main kitchens and two of two pantry refrigerators checked (Unit 1 and Unit 4), failed to served food in a safe and sanitary manner during tray line observation, and failed to monitor resident's personal refrigerators for temperatures for one of one residents reviewed with personal refrigerator (Resident R121). Findings include: Facility policy entitled Food Storage dated 4/21/26, indicated Un-served leftovers shall be labeled, dated and stored for a period not to exceed there (3) days. Facility policy entitled Storage of Perishable Foods dated 4/21/26, indicated products such as salad greens, celery, radishes, etc, should be cleaned, trimmed, rinsed, and stored in plastic bags. Facility employee handbook section entitled Meals indicated if a lunch is brought and must be refrigerated, it can be put in the refrigerator in the break room. Facility policy entitled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean homelike environment and ensure resident's wheelchairs were in working order for one of four units (Unit 1). Findings include: Facility policy entitled Resident Environment dated 4/21/26, indicated the facility will provide an environment that is safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike. Observation on Unit One on 6/23/26, at 2:01 p.m. revealed Resident R116 sitting in his/her wheelchair with dried dirty substance down the right side of the wheelchair and crumbs / debris on the frame of the wheelchair. Observations on Unit One on 6/23/26, at 2:25 p.m. revealed Resident R59 sitting in his/her wheelchair. The left wheelchair brake was not working, left armrest plastic covering was cracked and pealing exposing the foam underneath it, and the right armrest was missing the foam and plastic covering. During an interview on 6/23/26, at 3:34 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident R116's wheelchair was unclean with dried debris noted, and Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies, clinical record, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide resident and/or resident representative with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy (explanation of how long a bed can be held during a leave of absence and the cost per day) and failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider upon transfer to the hospital for two of three residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents R12 and R50). Findings include: Facility policy entitled Bed Hold Policy and Procedure dated 4/21/26, indicated that upon discharge from the facility and admission to a hospital, the Social Service Department or the Administrator's designee will contact, by telephone and in writing, the resident/responsible part to inform them that the resident was discharged to the hospital and of the 15-day bed hold, under Medicaid. Resident R12's clinical record revealed an admission date of 7/8/25, with diagnoses that included Breast Cancer, Dementia (loss of cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the management of a colostomy for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident R26), and failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for medication administration for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident R4).Findings include: Review of facility policy dated 4/21/26, entitled Medication Administration revealed Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of attending physicians; The Resident's E-MAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) is initialed by the person administering a medication in the space provided under the date and on the line for that specific medication dose administration. Documentation is done immediately after the administration and/or refusal of the medication or attempt; The employee who administers medications to residents shall record and sign on the individual medication record of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe environment related to smoking for one of six residents who smoke at the facility reviewed (Resident R48). Findings include: Facility policy entitled, Smoking Policy, dated 4/21/26, revealed Designated smoking areas have been established outside the building for these residents, staff or visitors who choose to smoke; Smoking restrictions apply to all smoking methods including cigarettes, pipes, cigars and electronic cigarettes; To ensure the safety of all residents, smoking supplies for all residents will be kept locked in the medication cart and provided to the resident upon request. Review of Resident R48's clinical record revealed an admission date of 2/12/26, with diagnoses that included gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD-a condition where stomach acid flows back into the esophagus [tube that passes food from the mouth into the stomach]), anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be nervous, uneasy, or worried about something or someone), and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications, and failed to properly date two [NAME]-dose vial of Aplisol (an injectable diagnostic solution test to determine if a person has been infected with tuberculosis) in one of three medication storage rooms reviewed (Unit One medication storage room). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Storage of Medications with a policy review date of 4/21/26, revealed Medications are stored in a safe, secure, and orderly manner in accordance with federal and state regulations and facility policies. No discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated medications are available for use in the facility. All such medications are destroyed. Review of the manufacturer's instructions for Aplisol revealed, Aplisol vials should be inspected visually for both particulate matter and discoloration prior to administration and discarded if either is seen. Vials in use for more than 30 days should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies and clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete documentation for one of 27 residents reviewed (Resident R4). Findings include: Review of facility policy dated 4/21/26, entitled Medication Administration revealed Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of attending physicians; The Resident's E-MAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) is initialed by the person administering a medication in the space provided under the date and on the line for that specific medication dose administration. Documentation is done immediately after the administration and/or refusal of the medication or attempt; The employee who administers medications to residents shall record and sign on the individual medication record of each resident the medication, dosage and time it was given. This shall be done as soon as possible after the medications have been given. Review of facility policy dated 4/21/26, entitled Documentation revealed Nursing documentation will follow…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor oxygen saturation (a measurement to determine the amount of hemoglobin carrying oxygen in the red blood cells) according to physician orders for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident R1).Findings include: Facility policy entitled Oxygen Administration dated 4/21/26, indicated oxygen therapy will be provided when a resident needs oxygen at a concentration greater than room air.to administer oxygen to the resident when insufficient oxygen is being carried by the blood to the tissues. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/28/26, with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (heart does not pump blood efficiently leading to fluid retention), respiratory failure with hypoxia (respiratory system fails to adequately oxygenate the blood), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive group of lung diseases that cause damage and inflammation in the lungs making it difficult to breath). Residents R1's clinical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$21,645 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $21,645 — penalty dated 2026-01-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to KADIMA HEALTHCARE GROUP — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA