Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Latrobe
576 Fred Rogers Drive, Latrobe, PA 15650 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 107 certified beds · (724) 537-4441 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (70) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $17,073 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-04)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2026-04 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.6% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.5% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.7% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.7% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.8% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.1% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.7% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.5% | 25.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 35.0% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 34.5% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.45 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.97 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 107 beds and averages 100.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
70 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies, clinical records and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect by providing a food item the resident was allergic to for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1), which resulted in an anaphylactic reaction requiring hospitalization.Findings include:The facility's abuse/neglect policy, dated August 13, 2025, indicated that each resident had the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property.Neglect was defined as the failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Neglect refers to failure through inattentiveness, carelessness, or omission to provide timely, consistent, safe, adequate, and appropriate services, treatment of care, including but not limited to nutrition medication, therapies, and activities of daily living.A quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-05-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were not provided with foods that they were allergic to for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1), resulting in an allergic reaction for the resident. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance.Findings include:The facility's policy regarding a nutrition assessment, dated August 13, 2025, indicated that a nutrition assessment would be completed for each resident admitted to the facility. A nutrition assessment would be completed and include the following information: weight, height, hematologic data, nutritional intake, eating habits, food preferences and dislikes, dietary restrictions, diagnoses, other information deemed appropriate and necessary, and food allergies.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated February 2, 2026, revealed that the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, job descriptions, staff education records, clinical records, and investigation reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect while being transported to dialysis for one of 12 residents reviewed (Resident 1), resulting in harm to Resident 1 due to a fall that resulted in a fracture. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding abuse and neglect, dated November 24, 2024, indicated that the resident had the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Neglect was defined as the failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness. Neglect referred to failure through inattentiveness, carelessness, or omission to provide timely, consistent, safety adequate, and appropriate services, treatment of care, including but not limited to: nutrition, medications, therapies, and activities of daily living. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and facility investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible for one of 12 residents reviewed (Resident 1) who used a wheelchair, resulting in a fracture. Findings include: The facility's transportation policy, dated November 24, 2024, revealed that all employees who operate a vehicle would receive, upon hire, training in bus/van policies, procedures, and operations. Additionally training was to be provided on a regular basis. Both staff clients were to wear a seatbelt at all times when the vehicle was in operation and clients in wheelchairs were to be secured with the use of wheelchair locks, as well as either a lap belt or shoulder safety belt. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated November 29, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, had limited range of motion to her upper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for two of 13 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 4 ), in the East dining room, and in three out of three shower rooms reviewed (East, [NAME] 1 and [NAME] 2). Findings include:The facility's policy titled Resident Environment, dated April 20, 2026, revealed that the policy objective was to provide a safe, clean and homelike environment for residents.Observations of Resident 2 on May 28, 2026, at 10:42 a.m. and at 4:00 p.m. revealed that the resident was sitting up in her bed with the privacy curtain closed. The curtain had multiple areas of stains of different colors and substances.Interview with the Maintenance Supervisor on May 28, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. confirmed that Resident 2's privacy curtain was dirty and not homelike. He explained that staff would contact maintenance that a privacy curtain needed laundry service. Maintenance staff would remove the curtain and then hang a clean curtain.Observations of Resident 4 on May 28, 2026, at 10:32 a.m. and at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide discharge planning for one of 13 residents reviewed (Resident 2) who planned to be discharged to go home.Findings include:A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated May 1, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, could understand, was understood, was independent with bed mobility and required supervision, and was occasionally incontinent of bladder and continent of bowel.Observations and interview of Resident 2 on May 28, 2026, at 10:42 a.m. revealed that the resident was sitting up in her bed. She explained that she was ready to discharge home about six weeks ago, but feels like she was stuck. She has an apartment, she has care givers, she has family to assist her, and she wanted to discharge weeks ago. She did not want to leave against medical advice, because the facility would contact protective services, and she would not be provided necessary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect residents' food allergies for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated August 13, 2025, indicated that the resident would be reassessed at least quarterly, and the care plan would be reviewed by the interdisciplinary team. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated February 2, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and could eat independently. An allergy report, dated October 31, 2025, indicated that Resident 1 had an allergy to tree nuts.A nursing note for Resident 1, dated April 4, 2026, revealed that at 5:00 p.m. the Registered Nurse 3 was notified that the resident had an emesis after being given chocolate and exhibited seizure like activity. Upon being returned to bed, the resident complained of abdominal pain. The resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and shower schedules, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with showers as scheduled for one of 45 residents reviewed (Resident 72).Findings include:The facility policy for the flow of care dated April 15, 2025, indicated that care will be provided to residents, as needed 24 hours a day to attain and maintain the highest level of functioning. The provision of targeted care needs shall be documented on Care Tracker/Point of Care/ADL Flow Records. The charge nurse and/or the unit manager will be responsible for evaluating compliance with flow of care expectations and providing education or intervention as needed to assure the needs are met on an ongoing basis. Step 11 in the flow of care for evening shift includes providing baths and showers. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 72 , dated January 19, 2026, indicated that the resident was able to make himself understood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0694 — patternProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that central venous catheters were flushed per facility policy for three of 45 residents reviewed (Resident 64, 91, 107).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding flushing central venous (midline) catheters (a thin tube inserted into a vein and used long-term for the administration of fluids and/or medications), dated August 13, 2025, indicated that the catheter was to be flushed before and after it was used to administer medication and was to be documented in the medical record.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 64, dated December 29, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with daily care needs and was receiving care after joint replacement surgery. Physician's orders for Resident 64 dated March 14, 2026, included for the resident to receive two grams of Cefazolin (an antibiotic) intravenously every eight hours for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident dignity for one of 45 residents reviewed (Residents 27). Findings include:The facility's policy titled personal privacy, dated August 13, 2025, indicated that the facility staff will treat residents in a manner that maintains the privacy of their bodies. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 27, dated January 20, 2026, revealed that the resident was sometimes understood, sometimes understood others, was moderately cognitively impaired, and required assistance from staff for daily care needs.Observations of Resident 27 on March 17, 2026, at 3:15 p.m. revealed that he was sitting in a wheeled shower chair while staff pushed him approximately 30 feet from the shower room down the first floor hall to his room. Resident 27 had a folded sheet/blanket across his lap, his chest, back, upper thighs and legs were exposed. Interviews with Nurse Aide 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment by not maintaining ceiling heating ventilation and air conditioning units (HVAC), and not providing a clean wheelchair for one of 45 residents reviewed (Residents 5). Findings include: The facility's policy titled resident rights, dated August 13, 2025, indicated that the resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment.Observations on March 16, 2026 at 9:58 a.m. of the East Hall heating and air conditioning unit revealed that the unit had a thick layer of dust accumulated on the filters and that it was making a rattling noise. Observations of the [NAME] 1 hall heating and air conditioning unit on March 16, 2026 at 10:42 a.m. revealed that the unit had a thick layer of dust on the filters.Observations of the [NAME] 2 hall heating and air conditioning unit revealed that there was a thick layer of dust on the filters and that the filters were hanging out of the unit.Interview with the Maintenance Director on March 18, 2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in residents' care needs for two of 45 residents reviewed (Resident's 65 and 72). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated [DATE], indicated that nursing staff and/or the interdisciplinary team were to initiate and/or update care plans for the resident as warranted. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 65, dated February 3, 2026, indicated that the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance from staff for daily care tasks, and had diagnoses that included cerebral palsy and intellectual disorders.A review of Resident 65's clinical record revealed that from the date of her admission, [DATE], until [DATE], the resident was a Full Code (provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that bowel protocols were followed as ordered by the physician for one of 45 residents reviewed (Resident 3).Findings include:An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated January 7, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and was frequently incontinent of bowel movements. Physician's orders for Resident 3, dated January 2, 2026, included orders for the resident to receive 4 ounces of prune juice as needed for no bowel movement in two days and was to be administered every shift until the resident had a bowel movement; 30 milliliters of Milk of Magnesia as needed for no bowel movements for three days; a 10 milligram bisacodyl suppository rectally as needed for no bowel movement for four days; and a Fleets enema to be given rectally as needed if the resident did not have a bowel movement in 12 hours after the bisacodyl suppository.Review of Resident 3's bowel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible by transporting a resident without leg rests for one of 45 residents reviewed (Resident 42). Findings include:An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 42, dated December 12, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance from staff for care. Observations on March 18, 2026 at 9:30 a.m. revealed that Nurse Aide 8 pushed resident 42 from her room out into the hallway with her legs dangling and no leg rests on the chair.Interview with Nurse Aide 8 on March 18, 2026 at 9:30 a.m. revealed that she pushed Resident 42 without leg rests because she could not find any in the resident's closet.Interview with the Director of Nursing on March 18, 2026 at 11:35 a.m. confirmed that Resident 42 should have had leg rests on her wheelchair while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 56 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, manufacturer's prescribing information, facility's medications not to be crushed list, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated August 13, 2025, revealed that medications were to be administered in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and in order to ensure the safe, accurate and timely administration of medications. All drugs, devices and related materials will be administered in accordance with federal and state laws and regulated.The facility's list of medications not to be crushed, revised August 13, 2025, revealed that metformin extended release (ER), Myrbetriq ER, and propranolol hydrochloride (HCL) were not be crushed.Physician's orders for Resident 32, dated January 17, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 20 milligrams (mg) Propranolol hydrochloride (HCL) three times a day, an order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the facility policies, the facility's list of medications that are not to be crushed, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label medications with the appropriate instructions for administration for one of 45 residents reviewed (Resident 32).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated August 13, 2025, revealed that medications were to be administered in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and in order to ensure the safe, accurate and timely administration of medications. All drugs, devices and related materials will be administered in accordance with federal and state laws and regulated.The facility's list of medications not to be crushed, revised August 13, 2025, revealed that propranolol HCL, metformin hydrochloride (HCL) extended release (ER), and Myrbetriq ER were not be crushed.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 32, dated February 3, 2026, revealed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include:The facility's deficiencies and plan of corrections for an annual survey ending December 10, 2025, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending March 19, 2026, identified repeated deficiencies related to quality care, IV fluids, and labeling drugs.The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding accurate MDS assessments, cited during the survey ending December 10, 2025, revealed that the facility would complete audits and report the results of the audits to the QAPI committee for review. The results of the current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for three of five residents reviewed (Residents 2,3,5).Findings include: The facility's policy regarding medication administration, dated May 14, 2025, indicated that nursing staff who administer medications to residents shall record and sign on the individual medication record of each resident the medication, dosage and time the medication was administered. Documentation is to be done immediately after the administration. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated October 20, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance for care needs, was at risk for pain related to spinal stenosis and discitis (inflammation and infection in the disc space in the spine).Physician's orders for Resident 2, dated October 20, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — patternProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with proper colostomy care for two of 33 residents reviewed (Residents 4 and 84). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4 indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, had a diagnosis of paraplegia (the partial or complete paralysis of the lower half of the body, including both legs), and had an ostomy (a surgically created opening in the abdomen- part of the body between the chest and the hips). Care plan for Resident 4 dated September 11, 2025, indicated that the resident had a colostomy (opening on your abdomen that connects your colon (large intestine) to the outside of your body) and staff were to change the colostomy appliance as necessary. A nurse's note for Resident 4, dated October…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0694 — patternProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as observations staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate treatment and care for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC - a thin tube that's inserted through a vein in your arm and passed through to the larger veins near your heart) for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 58).Findings include:A facility policy for the care and maintenance of PICC and midline catheters (a small flexible tube inserted through a vein in your arm that is shorter than a PICC) dated May 14, 2025, indicated that registered nurses will routinely care for and maintain PICC and midline catheters. PICC's and midlines require the first dressing change 24 hours after insertion and require further dressing changes every week and as needed. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 58 dated August 8. 2025, indicated that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, required the assistance of staff for daily care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facilty policy and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that communication was shared regarding a resident's health status or changes in condition before and after dialysis for one of 33 residents reviewed that received dialysis (Resident 1). Findings include:A facility policy for Dialysis Care, dated May 14, 2025, indicated that residents ordered dialysis therapy will be monitored, and documentation will be maintained in the medical record. Medical information/record received from the dialysis provider shall be maintained as part of the facility's medical record for the residents. Should such information not be received from the dialysis provider upon return, the facility shall contact the dialysis provider to obtain such medical information. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated October 23, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that ice was stored under sanitary conditions for the ice machine located in the dining room. Findings include:The facility's policy for ice storage, dated May 14, 2025, revealed that the facility was to make sure there was a gap between the drain from the ice machine and the drainage pipe.Observations of the ice machine in the main dining room on November 6, 2025, at 8:42 a.m. revealed that the ice machine drain was positioned into a PVC pipe that ran to a bucket under the sink, which was to be drained by a sump pump. The opposite end of the PVC drain pipe was laying on the rim of a bucket that was full of stagnant water. There was no air gap between the ice machine drain pipe and PVC pipe or the opposite end of the PVC pipe and the bucket located under the sink. Interview with the Maintenance Director on November 6, 2025, at 8:45 a.m. confirmed that there was no air gap between the ice machine drain. He indicated that the sump pump was not functioning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and personnel records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that reference checks were obtained prior to hire for five of five new employees reviewed (Nurse Aides 1 and 2, Licensed Practical Nurse 3, Registered Nurse 4, Maintenance Director).Findings include:The facility's policy regarding the screening of new hires, dated May 14, 2025, indicated that new employees would be screened for hire and their complete personnel record would include documentation of verified references.The personnel file for Nurse Aide 1 revealed that she was hired on September 2, 2025, and there was no documented evidence that reference checks from previous employers were obtained prior to the staff's start date.The personnel file for Nurse Aide 2 revealed that she was hired on September 11, 2025, and there was no documented evidence that reference checks from previous employers were obtained prior to the staff's start date.The personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse 3 revealed that she was hired on July 7, 2025, and there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a discharge summary was completed by the physician for one out of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 100). Findings include: A review of Resident 100's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].A nursing note, dated September 4, 2025, at 12:40 p.m. revealed Resident 100 was discharged from the facility to a senior living community.There was no documented evidence in the resident's clinical record at the time of the survey ending November 6, 2025, the physician completed a discharge summary upon the resident's discharge from the facility. An interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing on November 5, 2025, at 2:51 p.m. confirmed that the physician did not complete a discharge summary upon the resident's discharge from the facility.28 Pa. Code 201.29(j) Resident Rights.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders regarding medication administration were followed for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 78).Findings include:The facility policy for medication administration dated May 14, 2025, included that medications are administered in accordance with written orders of attending physicians, and that electronic medication administration record (E-MAR) documentation of medication orders includes pulse or blood pressure where appropriate or respiration rate. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 78, dated October 21, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, independent with personal care needs, and had diagnoses that included Diabetes.Physician's orders for Resident 78, dated October 15, 2025, included an order for the resident to have his amlodipine (medication used to treat high blood pressure and certain types of chest pain)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the physician, resulting in a significant medication error for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 78)Findings include:The facility policy for medication administration dated May 14, 2025, included that medications are administered in accordance with written orders of attending physicians. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 78, dated October 21, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, independent with personal care needs, and had diagnoses that included diabetes.Hospital discharge records for Resident 78, dated July 12, 2025, included physician's orders for the resident to receive insulin aspart (a rapid acting insulin) using sliding scale coverage (an insulin dosing method where the amount of insulin administered is based on an individual's current blood sugar level) three times a day before meals; 22 units of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and manufacturer's instructions, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label multi-dose containers of medications with the date they were opened in one of three medication rooms observed (East 1 medication room). Findings include:The facility's policy regarding medication storage, dated May 14, 2025, revealed that medications were to be stored in a safe, secure, and orderly manner in accordance with federal and state regulations, and facility policies. Manufacturer's directions for use of Aplisol (tuberculin purified protein derivative), dated March 2016, indicated that the vials in use more than 30 days should be discarded due to possible oxidation and degradation, which may affect potency.Observations of the medication refrigerator in the East 1 medication room on November 6, 2025, at 10:23 a.m. revealed three opened and undated bottles of Aplisol solution.Interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing at the time of observation confirmed that the opened bottles of Aplisol solution should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the designated interdisciplinary team member obtained the required information from the contracted hospice provider for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 42) who were receiving hospice services.Findings include: A facility policy for Hospice Care dated May 14, 2025, indicated that all hospice assessments, plans of care, progress notes and services provided will be maintained in the medical record and integrated with the facility plan of care. Nursing staff will ensure there is a current physician ' s order, physician progress note regarding hospice care, and hospice documentation is current and available on the medical record. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 42, dated September 26, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for daily care needs, had diagnoses that included dementia, and was receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain compliance with nursing home regulations and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.Findings include:The facility's deficiencies and plans of correction for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending May 20, 2025, and July 30, 2025, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending November 6, 2025, identified repeated deficiencies related to failure to comply with abuse policies, providing quality care, proper storage of medications, and food procurement-storing/preparing/serving food under sanitary conditions.The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding abuse policies,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain professional practices that support infection prevention and control for three of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 58, 63, and 103).Findings include:A facility policy for hand hygiene/handwashing dated May 14, 2025, included that effective hand hygiene reduces the incidence of healthcare-associated infections. Handwashing may be used for routinely decontaminating hands in the following clinical situation: after removing gloves. If hands are not visibly soiled, an alcohol-based hand rub may be used for routinely decontaminating hands in the following clinical situation: after removing gloves. The use of gloves does not eliminate the need for hand hygiene. Remove gloves promptly after use, before touching non-contaminated items and environmental surfaces, and before caring for another patient. Wash hands after removing gloves. Non-surgical hand hygiene technigue includes to wet hand with running water, apply hand washing agent to hands,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2).An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandatory assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated July 3, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, needed assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had medical diagnoses that included infection of joint prothesis and diabetes mellitus. Physician's orders for Resident 2 dated, June 28, 2025, included an order for the resident to receive 15 units of Glargine (insulin for diabetes mellitus) subcutaneously (injected into the skin) at bedtime, and take as needed when blood sugar is greater than 300 mg/dl, however, a review of Resident 2's June and July 2025 Medication Administration Record revealed no documented evidence that the residents blood sugar was being monitored per physician orders. Interview with the Director of Nursing on July 30, 2025 at 1:12 p.m. confirmed that there was no documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in residents' care needs for five of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 17, 33, 58, 61). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding care plans, dated May 14, 2025, indicated that the resident will be reassessed at least quarterly, and the care plan will be reviewed by the interdisciplinary team. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 3, dated February 21, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance from staff for daily care needs. A care plan for Resident 3, dated June 14, 2024, indicated that the resident had a foley catheter (thin flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine). A nurse's note for Resident 3, dated January 22, 2025, indicated that the resident's foley catheter came out and orders were received to not re-insert the foley catheter. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that physician's orders were followed for two of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 17, 78). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 17, dated February 3, 2025, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, and had a diagnosis of included hypertension (high blood pressure). Physician's orders for Resident 17, dated March 6, 2025, included an order for staff to administer one 25 milligram (mg) tablet of Metoprolol (used alone or in combination with other medications to treat high blood pressure) two times a day, and staff was to hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure (the top number of a blood pressure reading) was less than 90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or if the heart rate was less than 60 beats per minute.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of manufacturer's instructions, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that ice was stored under sanitary conditions for the ice machine next to the kitchen. Findings include: The manufacturer's instructions, undated, for the use of the ice machine in the main dining room, stated that the drain line must have a 1.5-inch drop per 5 feet of run and must not create traps and that the floor drain must be large enough to accommodate drainage from all drains. Observations of the ice machine in the main dining room on May 17, 2025, at 9:17 a.m. revealed that the ice machine drain was draining into a bath basin and that the drain pipe was lying in the stagnant water in the basin. There was a small pump pumping some of the water into the nearby sink. There was no air gap between the drain pipe and the basin. Interview with Nursing Home Administrator on May 18, 2025, at 9:52 a.m. revealed that the ice machine was removed from service until the proper drainage system with air gap could be installed. 28 Pa. Code 211.6(f)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to honor the resident's right to make informed choices and participate in his/her treatment for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 52). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 52, dated January 31, 2025, indicated that the resident was always understood, could always understand others, and was cognitively intact. A nursing note for Resident 52, dated April 29, 2025, revealed that the resident was to be discharged into the care of his brother on May 9, 2025. An interview with Resident 52 on May 17, 2025, at 10:15 a.m. revealed that the resident was looking for answers regarding his discharge plans. He stated that he thought he was supposed to go home a couple weeks ago, but that no one has talked to him to explain anything to him. He stated that his mother told him that the staff were dragging their feet about his discharge. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and employee files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that license checks were obtained prior to hire for one of one registered nurse reviewed (RN 1). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding protection from abuse, dated November 1, 2024, indicated that policies and procedures were developed to aid in preventing abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of residents, and protocols for conducting employment background checks and screening of employees. The personnel file for Registered Nurse 1 revealed a start date of March 9, 2025, with a license check done on March 10, 2025. There was no documented evidence that a license check was obtained prior to the staff's start date of March 9, 2025. Interview on May 19, 2025, at 12:50 p.m. with Regional Human Resources Director revealed that Registered Nurse 1's license check should have been completed prior to her start date and it was not. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for five of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 17, 20, 21, 25, 61). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides guidance and instructions for the completion of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2024, indicated that the intent of Section N was to record the number of days, during the seven days of the assessment period, that any type of injection, insulin, and/or select medications were received by the resident. Section N0410F1 (Antibiotic Medications) was to be coded if an antibiotic medication was taken by the resident at any time during the seven-day look-back period; Section N0415B was to be coded yes if the resident received an anti-anxiety medication; and Section N0415I1 (Antiplatelet Medications - medications used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete safety assessments for one of 36 residents reviewed who used siderails (Resident 3) and two of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 9, 25) who used an air mattress. Findings include: A facility policy for siderails dated May 14, 2025, indicated that an assessment will be made to determine the resident's symptoms or reason for using siderails. The use of siderails will be evaluated in terms of risk and benefit for each individual resident. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated February 21, 2025, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for daily care needs, and had diagnoses that included infection of a right knee prosthesis (artificial replacement). A side rail/assist bar evaluation/assessment for Resident 3, dated March 21, 2025, indicated that the resident was being assessed for an assist bar. Section D was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and observations, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure urinary output was monitored for two of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 33, 78) who had an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a federally-mandated assessment of the resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 33, dated February 4, 2025, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and had an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted and held in the bladder to drain urine). A care plan for Resident 33, dated November 1, 2024, revealed that the resident had an indwelling catheter related to a diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (a condition where the prostate gland becomes enlarged, which can cause urinary problems) and staff was to measure the urinary output as ordered. Physician's orders for Resident 33, dated February 19, 2025, included an order for staff to document the indwelling urinary catheter output every shift. Observation of Resident 33 on May 19, 2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the posting of their nurse staffing was current. Findings include: Observations on May 17, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. revealed that the nurse staffing information that was posted at the main entrance of the facility was dated May 15, 2025, and was not current. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 17, 2025, at 9:55 a.m. confirmed that the nurse staffing information that was posted was dated May 15, 2025, and was not the current staffing information as required. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a controlled drug was properly stored in one of two medication rooms reviewed (East Side Medication Room). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding storing controlled medications, dated November 1, 2024, indicated that Ativan (a controlled substance used to treat anxiety) was to be under double-lock security. The access key to controlled medications is not the same key that allows access to other medications. Observations of the East Side medication room on May 17, 2025, at 12:10 p.m. revealed one opened vial of Ativan that was not stored in a separately locked, permanently affixed container. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 2 on May 17, 2025, at 12:10 p.m. confirmed that there was no separately locked, permanently affixed container for the Ativan, and that it was just stored in the medication refrigerator with other non-controlled medications. Interview with Director of Nursing on May 18, 2025, at 9:58 a.m. confirmed that the vial of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were accurately documented for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 2, 3). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 32, dated May 2, 2025, revealed that the resident was confused. A nursing note for Resident 32, dated May 30, 2025, revealed that the resident was missing a part of her front tooth and a piece of the tooth next to it. She was crying, asking for a dentist, and stating that her tooth hurt. There was no indication in the Resident 32's clinical record that her pain was assessed by the nurse or that the resident was referred to the dentist. Interview with the Director of Nursing on May 20, 2025, at 1:02 p.m. revealed that the resident did see the dentist on March 31, 2025, and she provided his consult report. She stated that it should have been a part of Resident 32's clinical record. A quarterly MDS assessments for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for an annual survey ending December 4, 2024, and a complaint survey ending January 6, 2025, revealed that the facility developed a plan of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending May 20, 2025, identified a repeated deficiency related to pharmaceutical services/accountability of narcotics. The facility's plan of correction for a deficiency regarding inaccurate MDS assessments, cited during the survey ending December 4, 2024, revealed that the facility would complete audits and report the results of the audits to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment in three of three soiled utility rooms. Findings include: The facility's policy for Infection Control, dated January 2, 2024, indicated that the facility is committed to preventing adverse outcomes such as health care associated infections and their related events, improving resident care by supporting the staff in all areas of the facility, minimizing occupational hazards associated with the delivery of healthcare, and fostering evidence-based decision making. The goal of the program is to provide a safe and sanitary environment. The facility's policy for the laundry process, dated January 2, 2024, indicated that proper laundry processing is done to ensure resident and facility linen items are correctly cleaned and stored. Observations of the facility's three separate utility rooms revealed that the rooms were full of soiled linen bags thrown on the floor. Interview with Laundry Attendant 1 on February 24, 2024, at 9:38 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff and family interviews, and review of cleaning schedules, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment in residents' rooms for five of 12 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 8, 9, 10, 11) Findings included: Observations of Resident 6's room on December 30, 2024, at 12:45 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. revealed that the resident's privacy curtain was pulled around the foot of the resident's bed. The resident's privacy curtain had multiple colored stains that extended from the bottom of the curtain and upward approximately one-quarter the way up on the privacy curtain. The privacy curtain between the resident and her roommate had a reddish-colored stain to the bottom corner of the privacy curtain. Interview with the resident at 12:45 p.m. revealed that she could not recall when her room was cleaned last. Observations of Residents 8 and 9's room on December 30, 2024, at 12:41 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. revealed multiple food debris on the floor between the residents' beds. Observations of Residents 10 and 11's room on December 30, 2024, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment in three of three soiled utility rooms. Findings include: The facility's policy for Infection Control, dated January 2, 2024, indicated that the facility is committed to preventing adverse outcomes such as health care associated infections and their related events, improving resident care by supporting the staff in all areas of the facility, minimizing occupational hazards associated with the delivery of healthcare, and fostering evidence-based decision making. The goal of the program is to provide a safe and sanitary environment. The facility's policy for the laundry process, dated January 2, 2024, indicated that proper laundry processing is done to ensure resident and facility linen items are correctly cleaned and stored. Observations of the facility's three separate utility rooms revealed that the rooms were full of soiled linen bags thrown on the floor. Interview with Laundry Attendant 1 on October 22, 2024, at 9:38 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident's personal privacy was maintained. Findings include: The facility policy related to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA- a federal law that protects the privacy and security of sensitive health information), dated January 2, 2024, included in part, that the facility will keep information regarding a resident's health private and confidential, any paper containing information will not be disposed of in a trash container that is open and easily accessible, and staff will not allow any papers, documents, or any other format with resident information unattended. Observations of the outdoor trash receptacle on October 22, 2024, at 8:30 a.m. revealed a piece of plastic on the ground beside the rear dumpster, which appeared to be a lid for a bowl or cup, that included a resident's last name and the diet orders for a pureed diet with nectar thick liquids. Interview with the Registered Dietician on October 22, 2024, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for medications and treatments were followed for three of seven residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, 3). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated September 2, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required assistance with personal care needs, and had diagnosis that included high blood pressure and seizures. Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated October 10, 2024, included orders to cleanse right shin wounds with normal saline and apply Medihoney (a wound and burn gel with antibacterial and bacterial resistant properties) and dry dressing every dayshift. A review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident 1, dated October 2024, revealed that there was no documented evidence that the resident received treatment to his right shin wounds per physician's orders on October 11, 2024, and October 20, 2024.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly contain and dispose of garbage in one of two outside dumpsters. Findings include: Review of facility policy for garbage and rubbish disposal, dated January 2, 2024, indicated that outside dumpsters provided by the garbage pick-up services must be kept closed and free of litter around the dumpster area. Observation of the facility's outdoor trash receptacle on October 22, 2024, at 8:30 a.m. revealed that the rear dumpster was uncovered, and there was garbage on the ground around the dumpster that included two plastic bags with garbage, white plastic gloves, washcloths, paper trash, and cardboard. An interview with the Registered Dietician on October 22, 2024, at 8:50 a.m. confirmed that the lid on the rear dumpster was open and should have been closed, and that there was garbage on the ground around the dumpster. An interview with the Director of Nursing on October 22, 2024, at 10:40 a.m. confirmed that the facility failed to properly contain and dispose of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable, and functional environment related to laundry services. Findings include: Interview with Laundry Worker 1 on October 22, 2024, at 9:38 a.m. revealed that she was behind on completing the laundry because one washer and one dryer was broken, and that the facility was taking clothing to the laundromat to try to keep up. A new dryer was installed three weeks ago, and a new washer was installed last week. She was unsure how long they were without one washer and one dryer. Interview with Nurse Aide 2 on October 22, 2024, at 11:34 a.m. revealed that the facility's clothes washer had been broken recently and that she has observed some residents' clothing being returned to the residents appearing moldy and stained. Interview with Resident 7 on October 22, 2024, at 1:20 p.m. revealed that sometimes the facility is without clean washcloths and that on one occasion, when she was incontinent of bowel, staff provided incontinent care using paper towels, because she was told…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the hypoglycemic protocol was followed for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 1), failed to ensure that physician's orders for medications were followed for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 4), failed to schedule appointments as ordered for two of nine residents reviewed (Residents 5, 9), and failed to ensure that residents were taken to scheduled appointments for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 9). Findings include: The facility's medication administration policy, dated January 3, 2024, indicated that medications were to be administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physicians. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated May 28, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, received insulin (used to lower blood sugar levels), and had diagnoses that included diabetes (a disease that interferes with blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and legal guardian in writing regarding hospitalizations for three of nine residents reviewed (Residents 1, 5, 9). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated May 28, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, received insulin (used to lower blood sugar levels), and had diagnoses that included diabetes (a disease that interferes with blood sugar control). Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated that Family Member 1 was her Power of Attorney. A nursing note, dated June 22, 2024, at 11:17 p.m., revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 1 erroneously administered 25 units of insulin aspart instead of 25 units of Levemir. The resident was given eight ounces of apple juice and two cups of pudding. The resident's blood glucose was 63 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) and glucagon and glucose gel were ordered and administered. The resident's blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered as ordered by the physician for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 1), resulting in significant medication errors for the resident. Findings include: The facility's medication administration policy, dated January 3, 2024, indicated that medications were to be administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physicians. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated May 28, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, received insulin (used to lower blood sugar levels), and had diagnoses that included diabetes (a disease that interferes with blood sugar control). Physician's orders for Resident 1, dated April 17, 2024, included an order for the resident to receive 12 units of Novolog (fast acting insulin) subcutaneously (injected just under the skin into the fatty layer) twice a day with lunch and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for two of nine residents reviewed (Residents 5, 6). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated June 3, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could usually understand, was cognitively impaired, and required assistance with care needs. Interview and observations of Resident 5 on August 8, 2024, at 2:35 p.m. revealed that he was self propelling in his wheelchair back to his room and he stated that he would like to transfer to another facility to be closer to his sister. Interview with Director of Social Services on August 8, 2024, at 12:31 p.m. confirmed that one facility would not accept him because he was a positive Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASSAR - identified as having a serious…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews with family and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable and functional environment related to laundry services. Findings include: Interview with Nurse Aide 1 on May 8, 2024, at 9:20 a.m. revealed that the facility's clothes dryer has been broken for at least two weeks causing a lack of available linens. The dryer was working on this day and staff were going to laundry to get washcloths as soon as they were done being laundered; however, there have been multiple times when washcloths were not available, and pillowcases were used as washcloths. Interview with Nurse Aide 2 on May 8, 2024, at 9:35 a.m. revealed that she believed the facility clothes dryer had been broken for about a month, and there were times that pillowcases were used as washcloths because clean, dry washcloths were not available for use. Nurse Aide 2 also indicated that clean and dry linens, including bed sheets, were not always available. Interview with Maintenance Worker 3 on May 8, 2024, at 12:06 p.m. revealed that the facility clothes dryer was broken…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete thorough investigations to rule out abuse or neglect following two falls for one of 12 residents reviewed (Resident 3). Findings include: A facility policy for incident and accident reports, dated January 2, 2024, revealed that the facility will document all unusual occurrences and events, and falls warrant an incident report. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 3, dated April 29, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood and could usually understand, required substantial to maximum assistance for person hygiene needs, and had a diagnosis that included alcohol dependence. Nursing notes for Resident 3, dated April 26, 2024, at 6:51 p.m. and again on April 27, 2024, at 9:15 a.m. revealed that staff entered the resident's room and observed the resident out of bed lying on the floor. There was no documented evidence that an incident report or investigation was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for two of 12 residents reviewed (Residents 11, 12) who had an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding catheter care, dated January 2, 2024, indicated that catheter care will be performed with morning and evening care and as needed after incontinence or bowel movements. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 11, dated February 1, 2024, revealed that the resident understood others and was understood, was cognitively intact, required assistance from staff for personal care needs, and had in indwelling urinary catheter (a thin flexible tube that is inserted into the bladder to drain urine). A care plan for Resident 11, dated August 15, 2022, indicated that the resident had an alteration in elimination related to use of an indwelling urinary catheter. Staff were to change the catheter per the physician's order. Current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-19 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews and dietary schedules, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient dietary staff to perform essential kitchen duties. Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 9, dated February 15, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was understood, could understand, and was independent with eating after set up. Interview with Resident 9 on March 19, 2024, at 10:52 a.m. revealed that the meals are served on styrofoam, mainly on the weekends, and he prefers to eat in his room. A dietary schedule indicated that meals were served on styrofoam on February 25, 2024, with management's permission. Interview with Dietary Staff 2 on March 19, 2024, at 12:07 p.m. revealed that meals are served on styrofoam when there is approval from management. Interview with the Dietitian on March 19, 2024, at 12:07 and 12:39 p.m. confirmed that the main entrees were served on styrofoam plates due to low staffing in the kitchen; there was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items at palatable temperatures. Findings include: A facility policy regarding food temperature recordings, dated January 3, 2024, indicated that all hot food will be held at 135 Fahrenheit (F) and cold foods will be held at 41 F or below. Food will be served at a preferable temperature for the resident, as hot foods were to be served hot and cold food were served cold and in accordance with the resident preference. Observations of the lunch meal service in the main kitchen on March 19, 2024, revealed that the [NAME] Wing cart containing a test tray left the main kitchen at 12:19 p.m. and arrived on [NAME] Wing at 12:21 p.m. Trays were passed to the residents that were in their rooms. The last resident was served at 12:32 p.m. The test tray was removed from the cart at 12:33 p.m. and the temperature of the iced tea was 46 degrees F, the mixed fruit was 47 degrees F, the coffee was 144 degrees F, the peas and carrots were 131…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and homelike environment in residents' shared shower rooms (East and West). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding Resident Environment, dated January 3, 2024, revealed that the facility will provide an environment that is safe, clean, comfortable and homelike, while allowing the residents to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. The facility's infection control policy concerning cleaning and disinfecting, dated January 3, 2024, revealed that cleaning and disinfecting of resident care items and environment will be conducted based on risk of infection involved. Staff were to clean all foreign materials such as blood, feces, dust, or dirt from a surface before disinfecting. Cleaning environmental surfaces such as floors, walls, and furniture should be done according to the schedule and as needed. Observations on March 19, 2024, at 10:17 a.m. and 2:48 p.m. in the East Hall shared shower room revealed a large area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an ongoing infection prevention and control program in two shower rooms (East and [NAME] Hall) that are shared by residents. Findings include: The facility's infection control policy regarding cleaning and disinfecting, dated January 3, 2024, revealed that cleaning and disinfecting of resident care items and the environment will be conducted based on risk of infection involved. Staff were to remove all foreign materials such as blood, feces, dust, or dirt from surfaces before disinfecting. The cleaning of environmental surfaces, such as floors, walls, and furniture, should be done according to the schedule and as needed. Observations on March 19, 2024, at 10:17 a.m. and 2:48 p.m. in the East Hall shower room revealed a black substance on the wall above the showers near the ceiling and crown molding. Observations on March 19, 2024, at 10:21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, clinical records, and investigation reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of 14 residents reviewed (Resident 4) was free from physical and verbal abuse. Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, dated January 3, 2024, revealed that each resident has the right to be free from abuse and neglect and are not to be subjected to abuse by anyone, including other residents. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 4, dated November 4, 2023, revealed that the resident was confused, did not have behaviors that put himself or others at risk for injury during the seven-day look-back period, and had diagnoses that included non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Alzheimer's, dementia, and violent behavior. The current behavior care plan for Resident 4 revealed that staff were to supervise the resident while in the hallways and redirect as needed, be direct with intrusive behavior, establish appropriate boundaries, and educate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure essential equipment was in safe operating condition in resident bathrooms. Findings include: Observations on March 19, 2024, at 10:36 a.m. and 2:56 p.m. revealed that the shared bathroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] did not have a sink and the wall and plumbing were exposed. Observations on March 19, 2024, at 2:56 p.m. revealed that the shared bathroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] did not have a functioning toilet. The toilet was wrapped in a black garbage bag. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on March 19, 2024, at 2:56 p.m. confirmed that the bathroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] did not have a sink and that it was removed sometime last week, and a new counter was ordered. She also confirmed that the bathroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] did not have a functioning toilet and that the pipes needed to be fixed. The Nursing Home Administrator revealed that the Maintenance Director was on leave, and that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of clinical records, as well as staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. Findings include: Resident Council Meeting Minutes, dated December 28, 2023, revealed that the residents voiced concerns about continued gnats in the building. Observations on March 19, 2024, at 2:56 p.m. around the doorway of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed small flying insects in the hallway. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on March 19, 2024, at 2:56 p.m. revealed that the pest control company has been providing services every two months; however, the only pest control records for the facility revealed service dates of February 7, 2024, and March 13, 2024. The facility was inspected and treated for pest activity by servicing fly lights and traps. There was no evidence of pest service before February 7, 2024. There was no evidence that the pest control treatments in February and March 2024 were effective in keeping the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with showers as scheduled for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident R1, dated July 16, 2023, indicated that the resident was alert and oriented, was independent with ADL's, and required supervision for bathing. Resident 1 was scheduled to have showers on Tuesdays and Fridays during the afternoon shift. A medication administration note for behaviors, dated October 4, 2023, revealed that Resident 1 refused a shower and stated that he would get one later on his own. Resident 1 frequently said he would get a shower later and then he did not. Resident 1 was noted with an odor due to refusing to bath or change his clothes, his hair and clothes were dirty, and his fingernails were long and dirty as he continued to refuse to perform any hygiene tasks or allow staff to assist. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to use proper infection control practices for handling linen while providing care for two of six residents reviewed (Residents 5, 6). Findings include: The facility's infection control policy concerning handling of linen, dated October 26, 2023, revealed that staff is to handle soiled linen using standard precautions, such as wearing gloves, and to not place soiled linen on floor or furniture. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 5, dated July 12, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance for daily care needs. Observations on November 8, 2023, at 9:09 a.m. revealed that Nurse Aide 1 exited the room of Resident 5 carrying soiled laundry with her bare hands and placed them in the dirty linen bin in the hallway. Interview with Nurse Aide 1 on November 8, 2023, at 9:10 a.m. confirmed that she should wear gloves…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate, ongoing activities designed to meet the needs of residents for three of nine residents reviewed (Residents 7, 8, 9). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 7, dated May 17, 2023, indicated that he was alert and oriented and that it was very important to him to do things with groups of people and to do his favorite activites. Interview with Resident 7 on September 25, 2023, at 12:08 p.m. indicated that he really enjoyed activites, but they no longer have them every day and that he likes doing things instead of staring at the four walls every day. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 8, dated August 16, 2023, indicated that she was alert and oriented and required supervison for her care needs. The plan of care for Resident 8, dated June 22, 2023, indicated that she had a need for socialization and that she was to safely assist activity staff with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and record a resident's fluid intake for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding measuring and recording intake, dated April 21, 2023, revealed that staff were to ensure that residents receive sufficient intake to maintain hydration and health, identify risk factors and/or clinical conditions in a resident that could lead to dehydration, and develop a plan of care to prevent dehydration from occurring. Physician's orders for Resident 4, dated February 6, 2023, included an order to offer 120 milliliters (ml) of fluids per shift. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 4, dated August 23, 2023, indicated that the resident had cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance from staff for daily care needs, and required extensive assist for eating. Resident 4's care plan, dated January 26, 2023, indicated that staff were to encourage greater than 50 percent fluid and food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate a resident's preference for a shower for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: A quarterly admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated August 29, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance for daily care needs. The facility's current shower schedule revealed that Resident 1 was to receive showers on the 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. shift every Monday and Thursday. Review of Resident 1 's bathing records for July, August and September 2023 revealed that the resident preferred to receive a shower and was scheduled to receive her shower on Mondays and Thursdays during the evening (2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.) shift. Documentation for Monday, July 17, 2023; Monday, July 24, 2023; Thursday, July 27, 2023; Monday, July 31, 2023; Thursday, August 3, 2023; Monday, August 14, 2023; Monday, August 28, 2023; Thursday,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and agency employee files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that licensure checks were obtained prior to hire for one of three agency employee files reviewed (Licensed Practical Nurse 1). Findings include: The facility policy for License and Registration of Nursing Personnel, dated April 21, 2023, indicated that the licensure/certification will be verified with the state Board of Nursing or Nurse Aide Registry. The employee file for Licensed Practical Nurse 1 indicated that she had an orientation checklist dated August 14, 2023. The facility indicated that her first scheduled work day was October 28, 2022. There was no documented evidence that the facily had a licensure check completed until September 25, 2023. Interview with Facility Scheduler 2 on September 25, 2023, at 4:04 p.m. confirmed there was no record of a licensure check prior to Licensed Practical Nurse 1's first day of work at the facility. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$17,073 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $8,399 — penalty dated 2024-12-04
- $8,674 — penalty dated 2024-12-04
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-29 for 16 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to KADIMA HEALTHCARE GROUP — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| KADIMA HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| PINNACLE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| LOWDEN, THOMAS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| MORRIS, DANIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| NAYLOR, DIEDRE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| PALMER, DEBORAH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| STRAUSS, JONATHAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| THOMAS, KIMBERLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| LATROBE REALTY MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| ROMEO, MICHELLE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| THIMONS, DAVID | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 95% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $366K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395892. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.