Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At Washington
1198 W. Wylie Avenue, Washington, PA 15301 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 74 certified beds · (724) 222-2148 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Jan 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $20,914 in federal fines (most recent 2023-08-23)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.7% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.8% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.1% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.4% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.8% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.7% | 20.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.8% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.1% | 25.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.4% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 63.2% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 6.6–17.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 71.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
62 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from neglect for three of six residents (Resident R1, R2 and R3), that resulted in actual harm for Resident R1 of facial abrasions and a subarachnoid hemorrhage. Findings include: Review of the United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 42 CFR §483.12. Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation defined neglect as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Review of facility policy Abuse Protection dated 1/26/23, indicated that each resident has the right to be free from abuse and neglect. Review of the facility policy Flow of Care dated 1/26/23, indicated care will be provided to residents, as needed 24-hours a day to attain the highest level of functioning. Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for the bed mobility needs for one of six residents (Resident R1), which resulted in actual harm of facial abrasions and a subarachnoid hemorrhage for Resident R1. Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that bed mobility is defined as how resident moves to and from lying position, turns side or side, and positions body while in bed or alternate sleep furniture. The RAI further indicated that How a resident turns from side to side, in the bed, during incontinence care, is a component of Bed Mobility and should not be considered as part of Toileting. Review of American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine - Caregiver Guide and Instructions for Safe Bed Mobility published 4/28/17, indicated bed mobility refers to activities such as scooting in bed, rolling, side-lying to sitting, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, manufacturers recommendations, observation, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to reorder medications timely for one of three residents (Resident R1).Findings included:Review of facility policy Ordering and Receiving Medications from the Dispensing Pharmacy dated 1/7/26, indicated Medications and related products are received from the dispensing pharmacy on a timely basis. The facility maintains accurate records of medication order and receipt. If medications are not automatically refilled by the pharmacy, reorder medication refills three to five days in advance of need to assure an adequate supply is on hand, or seven days for Schedule II controlled substances, Department of Veterans Affairs prescriptions, and mail order prescriptions.Review of facility policy Medication Administration dated 1/7/26, indicated if a dose of regularly scheduled medication is withheld, refused, or given at other than the scheduled time, the space provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for five of seven residents (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5).Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/26/26, included diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT, is a blood clot that forms in a deep vein, usually in the leg or pelvis), and lymphedema (the build-up of fluid in soft body tissues). Review of the plan of care for high blood pressure and CHF (congestive heart failure) dated 2/26/26, indicated to observe for signs and symptoms of CHF: SOB (shortness of breath), chest pain, edema (swelling caused by too much fluid trapped in the body's tissues), or elevated B/P (blood pressure). Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, resident observations, resident interviews and confidential staff interviews, and grievance review, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of five of eight residents (Resident R1, R3, R6, R7, and R8).Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Nursing Department Staff dated 1/7/26, indicated the facility will provide services by sufficient numbers of personnel on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to all resident sin accordance with resident care plans. Review of the facility policy Call Light Response dated 1/7/26, indicated, Staff will respond to the call light and the resident's requests and needs in a timely manner. During an interview on 3/27/26, at approximately 11:25 a.m., when asked if the facility maintained sufficient staff, Resident R6 stated, No, and they need better staff. Half don't do their job; they sit there and screw around. When asked if they receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to schedule a follow-up appointment for one of four residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of care needs) dated 2/26/26, included diagnoses of heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT, is a blood clot that forms in a deep vein, usually in the leg or pelvis), and lymphedema (the build-up of fluid in soft body tissues). Review of the plan of care for high blood pressure and CHF (congestive heart failure) dated 2/26/26, indicated to observe for signs and symptoms of CHF: SOB (shortness of breath), chest pain, edema (swelling caused by too much fluid trapped in the body's tissues), or elevated B/P (blood pressure). Review of the plan of care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's facility assessment, staff interview, professional standards, and facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to conduct and document a comprehensive, evidence-based facility assessment to ensure licensed nursing staff possessed the required training and competencies necessary to provide care and services for residents and Inform staffing decisions to ensure that there are a sufficient number of staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets necessary to care for its residents' needs as identified through resident assessments and plans of care as required. Findings include:Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Memorandum, Revised Guidance for Long-Term Care Facility Assessment Requirements (QSO-24-13-NH) dated June 18, 2024, revealed that the facility assessment must include an evaluation of diseases, conditions, physical or cognitive limitations of the resident population, acuity (the level of severity of residents' illnesses,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, documentation, staff interview and review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for Legionella (bacteria that causes disease found in contaminated water) control, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a comprehensive program for water management to monitor the potential development and spread of Legionella and failed to implement control measures for Legionella within the facility for twelve of twelve months (January 2025 through January 2026). Findings include:Review of the facility policy Legionella Policy dated 1/7/26, with a previous review date of 1/9/25, indicated specific actions should be taken for prevention of Legionella and for investigation should a case occur. Core Elements of the Water Management Plan are:1. Establish Water Management Plan team.2. Describe Center's water system using text and flow diagram.3. Risk assessment with control methods and corrective actions.4. Monitoring control measures.5. Corrective actions.6. Verification and validation.7. Documentation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespreadInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Infection Control for ten of ten staff members (Employee E9, E10, E11, E12, E13, E14, E15, E16, E17 and E18).Findings include:Review of the Facility Assessment most recently reviewed 1/7/26, listed under the training topics Infection Control Training is identified.Review of the facility policy Staff Development Program last reviewed on 1/7/26, with a previous review date of 1/9/25, identified Infection Prevention and Control as a topic for orientation and annual trainings required.Physical Therapy Aide Employee E9 had a hire date of 9/15/16, failed to have Infection Control training in-service between 1/17/25, and 1/30/26.Environmental Services Employee E10 had a hire date of 2/22/06, failed to have Infection Control training in-service between 2/22/24, and 1/30/26. Registered Nurse Employee E11 had a hire date of 11/4/19, failed to have Infection Control training in-service between 11/4/24, and 1/30/26. Activity Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0575 — patternPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and a staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to post contact information, Adult Protective Services (APS), State Agency, and a statement the resident may file a complaint with the State Agency as required, in the building in one of one location where postings are (first floor nursing unit). Findings include: The facility must post, in a form and manner accessible and understandable to residents, resident representatives; a list of names, addresses (mailing and email), and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups, such as the State Survey Agency, the State licensure office, adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities, the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program, the protection and advocacy network, home and community based service programs, and the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit. During observations completed on 1/29/26, at approximately 11:30 a.m., in the lobby, hallways in and around the nursing units, revealed the facility did not have the required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on two of two nursing units (North and South Nursing Units). Findings include:During an observation on 01/28/2026, from 10:12 a.m., through 11:25 a.m., the following was identified:Residents R44 and R41(room [ROOM NUMBER]) window air conditioner unit not covered to prevent cold air from entering, Resident R112 stated that she had told them cold air was coming in but was not fixed. Resident R112's personal fan had a white dusty substance covering the filtering area.Residents R77 and R2 (room [ROOM NUMBER]) air conditioner window unit was left with gaps in covered area allowing cold air to enter.Resident R61(room [ROOM NUMBER]) unit was loose from window and uncovered allowing cold air to enter room.Residents R35 and R25 (Room141) air conditioner window unit is observed with a flannel shirt to prevent cold air from entering and window blind is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews, and review of facility documents (grievances, resident council, and staffing) review, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for ten of sixteen residents (Residents R200, R500, R501, R502, R503, R504, R505, R506, R507, and 508).Findings include: During a group interview, on 1/28/26 at approximately 1:30 p.m., when asked if he felt the facility maintained enough staff to care for resident needs and answer call lights, consensus from the group was no. Residents verbalized frustration relating to care when staff is lower epically with the lack of aides and sometimes nurses in the building. Residents stated it is on all the shifts; the residents stated often the wait time is thirty minutes, though it can go to an hour or longer. Residents stated some of the staff responses when you use your call light are you just rang your light, you ring too much, what do you want now, and staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 50 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for five of five nurse aides (NA Employee E13, E15, E16, E17 and E18). Findings include:Review of personnel files revealed that Nurse Aide Employee E13 hire date was 10/21/98, there was no performance evaluation completed.Review of personnel files revealed that Nurse Aide Employee E15 hire date was 7/31/23, there was no performance evaluation completed.Review of personnel files revealed that Nurse Aide Employee E16 hire date was 9/11/24, there was no performance evaluations completed.Review of personnel files revealed that Nurse Aide Employee E17 hire date was 11/25/24, there was no performance evaluations completed.Review of personnel files revealed that Nurse Aide Employee E18 hire date was 11/27/24, there was no performance evaluations completed.During an interview on 1/30/26, at 10:15 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for five of five nurse aides (NA Employee E13,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store food products in the walk-in cooler and freezer which created the potential for cross contamination (Main Kitchen). Findings include:Review of facility policy Food Storage dated 1/9/26, indicated foods shall be received and stored in a manner that all foods in the freezer and refrigerators will be stored above the floor on shelves to facilitate thorough cleaning.During an observation of the main kitchen on 1/27/26, from 9:00 a.m., through 9:42 a.m., the following was observed:Walk in cooler and freezer had food stored to the ceiling and under the fan encasement allowing potential cross contamination. During an interview on 1/27/26, at 9:42 a.m., Dietary Manager Employee E21 confirmed that the facility failed to properly store food products which created the potential for food borne illness and cross contamination in the Main Kitchen.28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code: 201.18(b)(3) Management.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Quality Assurance attendance records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all the required committee members for four of four quarterly meetings (2/12/25, 3/19/25, 4/23/25, 5/28/25, 6/25/25 ,7/30/25, 8/27/25, 9/24/25,10/28/25, 11/18/25, and 12/16/25).Findings Include:Review of Quality assurance and Performance Improvement sign in sheets and attendance records for 2/12/25, 3/19/25, 4/23/25, 5/28/25, 6/25/25 ,7/30/25, 8/27/25, 9/24/25,10/28/25, 11/18/25, and 12/16/25, failed to reveal the Lab Representative and Community Member, one of whom must be the facility's administrator, owner, board member, or other individual in a leadership role who has knowledge of facility systems and the authority to change those systems.During an interview on 1/30/26, at 10:20 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to conduct Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly with all the required committee members for four of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on resident rights for three of ten staff members (Employees E9, E10 and E15).Findings include:Review of the Facility Assessment most recently reviewed 1/7/26, listed under the training topics Residents rights is identified.Review of the facility policy Staff Development Program last reviewed on 1/7/26, with a previous review date of 1/9/25, identified resident rights as a topic for orientation and annual trainings required.Physical Therapy Aide Employee E9 had a hire date of 9/15/16, failed to have Resident Rights in-service between 1/17/25, and 1/30/26.Environmental Services Employee E10 had a hire date of 2/22/06, failed to have Resident Rights in-service education between 2/22/25 and 1/30/26.Nurse Aide Employee E15 had a hire date of 7/31/23, failed to have Resident Rights in-service education between 1/17/25, and 1/30/26.During an interview on 1/30/26, at 10:15 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that five of five sampled Nurse Aides (NA) received a minimum of 12 hours of in-service education per year (NA Employees E13, E15, E16, E17 and E18). Findings include:Review of facility nurse aide training records revealed that NA Employee E13 did not receive 12 hours of in-service training in the last year.The facility was unable to provide documented evidence that NA Employee E13 had received a minimum of 12 hours of in-service training yearly.Review of facility nurse aide training records revealed that NA Employee E15 did not receive 12 hours of in-service training in the last year.The facility was unable to provide documented evidence that NA Employee E15 had received a minimum of 12 hours of in-service training yearly.Review of facility nurse aide training records revealed that NA Employee E16 did not receive 12 hours of in-service training in the last year.The facility was unable to provide documented evidence that NA Employee E16 had received a minimum of 12 hours of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy and clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the opportunity to formulate an advance directive (written instructions for when the individual is incapacitated) or conduct periodic review of instructions, for two of six residents reviewed (Resident R8, and R36).Findings Include: A review of the facility policy Advance Directives last reviewed 17/26 with a prior review date of 1/9/25, indicated procedures for periodic review of DNROrders will occur at least annually. This facility will allow revocations or amending DNR orders by the resident, the attorney in fact, the representative or treating physician. Such changes will be documented in the medical record. Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (or POLST) paradigm form is a form designed to improve patient care by creating a portable medical order form that records patients' treatment wishes so that emergency personnel know what treatments the patient wants in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain, residents who voice grievances can do so without fear of discrimination or reprisal for twelve of sixteen residents (R77, R200, R201, R500, R501, R502, R503, R504, R505, R506, R507, and 508).Findings include: The resident has the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and of other residents, and other concerns regarding their LTC facility stay. A review of the facility policy Grievances last reviewed 1/7/26 with a prior review date of 1/9/25, indicated Voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished. During a group interview,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to initiate a thorough investigation for potential abuse for one of three residents (Residents R400). Findings include:Review of the facility policy Abuse Protection last reviewed on 1/7/26. with a previous review date of 1/9/25, indicated that each resident has a right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, neglect, etc. The reporting and filing of accurate documents are required and necessary.Review of clinical record indicated Resident R400 was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses which included a stroke with left sided weakness (non-dominant side), heart flutter, epilepsy and kidney disease. A MDS (Minimum Data Set-a periodic assessment of resident care needs), dated 9/17/25, indicated diagnoses remained current. Review of facility provided documentation indicated a submitted event that indicated Resident R400 allegation of abuse from the Activity Director Employee E20, which had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop care plans that included instructions to provide person centered care for one of two residents (Resident R18).Findings include: Review of facility's policy MDS/RAI/Care Planning dated 1/6/26, indicated the facility will develop a written plan of care individualized for each resident, which identifies through an assessment process his/her strengths, problems and needs. Review of the clinical record face sheet revealed that Resident R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). Review of a psychiatry note dated 12/10/25, indicated Resident R18 had a diagnosis of chronic PTSD with extensive trauma history. Review of Resident R18's care plan dated 9/9/25, failed to reveal a care plan with goals and interventions for PTSD. During an interview on 1/30/26, at 11:00 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility assessment, facility policy, employee file and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed Prevention of Abuse and Neglect in-service education for two of ten employees (Employees E9and E15) Findings include:Review of the Facility Assessment most recently reviewed 1/7/26, listed under the training topics Abuse Training is identified.Review of the facility policy Staff Development Program last reviewed on 1/7/26, with a previous review date of 1/9/25, identified abuse as a topic for orientation and annual trainings required.Physical Therapy Aide Employee E9 had a hire date of 9/15/16, failed to have Abuse training in-service between 1/17/25, and 1/30/26.Nurse Aide Employee E15 had a hire date of 7/31/23, failed to have Abuse Training in-service education between 1/17/25, and 1/30/26.During an interview on 1/30/26, at 10:15 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility failed to provide training on abuse for two of ten staff members.28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa Code: 201.18 (b)(1) Management.28 Pa Code:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0946 — isolatedProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility assessment, facility policy, personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Compliance and Ethics for ten of ten staff members (Employee E9, E10, E11, E12, E13, E14, E15, E16, E17 and E18).Findings include:Review of the Facility Assessment most recently reviewed 1/7/26, listed under the training topics Code of Ethical Conduct is identified.Review of the facility policy Staff Development Program last reviewed on 1/7/26, with a previous review date of 1/9/25, identified corporate compliance as a topic for orientation and annual trainings required.Physical Therapy Aide Employee E9 had a hire date of 9/15/16, failed to have Compliance and Ethics training in-service between 1/17/25, and 1/30/26.Environmental Services Employee E10 had a hire date of 2/22/06, failed to have Compliance and Ethics training in-service between 2/22/24, and 1/30/26. Registered Nurse Employee E11 had a hire date of 11/4/19, failed to have Compliance and Ethics training in-service between 11/4/24, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the grievance policy, facility documents, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility policy does not include all required elements and that the facility failed to document, resolve, and provide response to residents and/or their responsible parties for eleven of thirteen residents (Resident R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, and R11). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Grievances dated 1/31/24, indicated the facility will support each resident's right to voice grievances (e.g., those about treatment, care, management of funds, lost clothing, or violation of rights) and to assure that after receiving a complaint/grievance, the facility actively seeks a resolution and keeps the resident appropriately appraised of its progress toward resolution. Further review of the policy Grievances revealed that the policy failed to contain information related to: -The right to file grievances anonymously. -Identification of a Grievance Official responsible for overseeing the grievance process. -The right to obtain a written decision regarding his or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of federal and state laws, facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to report allegations of abuse and neglect for five of twelve residents (Resident R1, R3, R8, R9 and R10). Findings include: Review of the Older Adult Protective Services Act of 11/6/87, amended by Act 1997-13, Chapter 7, Section 701, requires any employee or administrator of a facility who suspects abuse is mandated to report the abuse. All reports of abuse should be reported to the local area agency on aging and licensing agencies. Review of the facility's policy Abuse Reporting and Investigation dated 1/31/24, indicated anyone who witnesses an incident of suspected resident abuse is to intervene immediately and stop the abuse. They are to report it to the charge nurse or supervisor immediately. The policy further stated the Department of Health will be notified of the alleged event by the Administrator or designee per regulation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents, observations, and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for eight of 16 residents (Residents R1, R3, R5, R8, R9, R10, R12, and R13). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Flow of Care/ADL dated 1/31/24, indicated Care will be provided to residents, as needed 24-hour a day to attain and maintain the highest level of functioning. During an interview on 4/12/25, at 11:12 a.m. Resident R10 stated that staff tell her she pulls the call light too much, they don't care for all her needs, and that she hears the staff speak about being short-staffed. During an interview on 4/12/25, at 11:20 a.m. Resident R13 stated that fresh water isn't passed, and many times she has to get it herself. During an interview on 4/12/25, at 11:37 a.m. Resident R8 stated that the aides are short-staffed and the call lights can be long. During an interview on 4/12/25, at 11:40 a.m. Resident R12 stated that call lights seem like they take a long time. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-17 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy, federal regulation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide transfer notices to representatives of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Division for 12 of 12 months (January 2024 through December 2024). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Transfer and Discharge 1/31/24, indicated no resident will be discharged without timely notification of the resident, responsible party, or authorized representative. Review of Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations §483.15(c)(3) Notice Before Transfer: indicates, before a facility transfers or discharges a resident, the facility must (i) Notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. The facility must send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Federal Regulations further define emergency transfers as, When a resident is temporarily transferred on an emergency basis to an acute care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — widespreadEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, job descriptions, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to acceptable standards of practice related to participation in interdisciplinary meetings, monitoring of Food Service operations, resident interviews, and participation in the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), by the Registered Dietitian. Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Chapter 21, Professional and Vocational Standards: Responsibilities of the Licensed Dietitian/ Nutritionist Section 21.711 Professional Conduct indicated that the Licensed Dietitian/ Nutritionist shall provide information which will enable patients to make their own informed decisions regarding nutrition and dietetic therapy, including the reasonable expectations of the professional relationship. Review of the Registered Dietitian's Job Description, states that dietitian encourages the resident/family to participate in the development and review of the residents' plan of care, maintains an adequate liaison with families and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, documentation and review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for Legionella (bacteria that causes disease found in contaminated water) control, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a comprehensive program for water management to monitor the potential development and spread of Legionella and failed to implement control measures for Legionella within the facility for twelve of twelve months (December 2023 through December 2024). Finding include: Review of the facility policy Legionella Policy dated 1/9/25, previously dated 1/31/24, indicated Specific actions should be taken for prevention of Legionella and for investigation should a case occur. Core Elements of the Water Management Plan are: 1. Establish Water Management Plan team. 2. Describe Center's water system using text and flow diagram. 3. Risk assessment with control methods and corrective actions. 4. Monitoring control measures. 5. Corrective actions. 6. Verification and validation. 7. Documentation and communication. Review of Department of Health and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide concern forms and grievance boxes to residents and visitors on the nursing units and failed to provide an opportunity for anonymous grievances (Resident group). Findings include: A review of the facility policy Grievances reviewed 1/31/24 and 1/9/25, indicated it is the policy of the facility to support each resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal, or fear of discrimination. A grievance may include a formal, written grievance process or a resident's verbalized complaint to facility staff. During an interview on 1/14/25, at 10:30 a.m. the Resident Group stated, you cannot file an anonymous grievance, the only box and forms are in front of the Nursing Home Administrator's (NHA) office. During an observation on 1/14/25, at 11:45 a.m. revealed the grievance box in the front lobby is in front of the NHA's office and within sight of the receptionist. During an observation on 1/14/25, at 1:45 p.m. revealed no grievance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assess, document, and notify physicians of increased and decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels for five of seven residents reviewed (Residents R13, R26, R28, R29, and R46). Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control defines diabetes as: Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic (long-lasting) health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy. Most of the food you eat is broken down into sugar (also called glucose) and released into your bloodstream. When your blood sugar goes up, it signals your pancreas to release insulin. Insulin acts like a key to let the blood sugar into your body's cells for use as energy. If you have diabetes, your body either doesn't make enough insulin or can't use the insulin it makes as well as it should. When there isn't enough insulin or cells stop responding to insulin, too much blood sugar stays in your bloodstream. Over time, that can…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assess a resident for safe smoking for three of five residents reviewed (Residents R4, R10, and R54). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Smoking Policy dated 1/31/24, indicated that smokers will be reviewed on admission, at least quarterly, and as necessary depending on individual circumstances and changes in the resident's condition. Review of Resident R4's clinical record indicated an admission date of 9/19/09. Review of resident R4's MDS (Minimum Data Set- a periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 11/8/24, indicated the diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (arrhythmia of the heart), seizures, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of resident R4's care plan dated 2/6/24 indicated the resident goes outside to smoke, is at risk for side effects and injury form smoking due to limited range of motion, and a smoking safety screen will be reviewed per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolatedNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, personnel file review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were protected from potential for abuse by failing to perform criminal history background checks prior to hire for two of five personnel files reviewed (Employee E7 and E12). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Abuse: Protection From Abuse reviewed 1/31/24 and 1/9/25, revealed the resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect, and misappropriation of property. The facility conducts background checks and will not knowingly employ any individual who has been convicted of abusing, neglecting, or mistreating individuals. Review of facility policy Criminal Background Check reviewed 1/31/24 and 1/9/25, indicated a request for a criminal background check must be submitted to the Pennsylvania State Police prior to the start of active employment. Applicants may not be hired or attend orientation until such time as the criminal background clearance is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, manufacturers recommendations, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents are free of significant medication errors for one of two residents observed (Resident R3). Findings include: A review of the facility policy Medication Administration dated 1/31/24, indicated medications are administered, as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices to ensure the safe, accurate and timely administration of medications. A review of the manufacturer's guideline for glargine insulin (Lantus-long acting type of insulin that works slowly, over about 24 hours) Solostar prefilled pen, November 2000, specified to perform a safety test before each injection. Select a dose of two units, hold the pen with the needle pointing upwards, gently tap the reservoir to remove air bubbles, press the injection button all the way in and check if insulin comes out of the needle tip. A review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical and facility record review, facility submitted documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one of four residents (Resident R1). Review of the facility policy Resident Elopement dated 1/31/24, indicated cognitively impaired residents at risk for elopement will be appropriately monitored to reduce the potential for injury. Elopement is defined as a resident leaving the physical structure of the facility without knowledge of facility staff. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2023, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documentation of an effective training program, that included training topics based on the resident population for one of four residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Staff Development dated 1/31/24, indicated, the facility must ensure that facility employees are competent in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs and/or complete assigned job tasks. There shall be an ongoing coordinated education program which is planned and conducted for the development and improvement of skills of the facility personnel including training related to problems, needs and rights of the residents. Review of the Facility Assessment dated November 2023, indicated the facility will maintain an adequately trained and competent staff. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2023, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — widespreadKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' medical information in one area (storage shed). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Confidentiality dated 1/31/24, indicated that residents have the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and clinical records. Review of the facility policy Medical Records Storage dated 1/31/24, indicated that all medical records will be stored in a secure, fire-protected, waterproof area. During an observation of a unsecured storage shed behind the facility on 6/4/24, at 8:15 a.m., approximately 75 boxes of loose paper, with resident information observed throughout the shed. During an interview on 6/4/24, at 8:17 a.m., Maintenance Director Employee E1 confirmed that the paperwork was stored in the storage shed due to lack of space, and the shed is left unsecured all the time. During an interview on 6/4/24, at 9:20 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to maintain the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, homelike environment on one of two nursing units(North Wing), and in the main dining room. Findings include: During observations on 6/4/24, from 8:45 a.m., through 9:45 a.m., the following was identified: Residents R1 and R2 had hole in he floor near baseboard by the bathroom. Residents R3 and R4 had areas of chipped paint under the window surrounding the heater. Residents R5 and R6 had a cracked ceiling above bed 2, Resident R6 stated the ceiling may leak through the hole, but I haven't seen any water. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] currently empty had a broken wall plug plate in the bathroom. Residents R7 had unfinished drywall with spackling behind beds. The main dining room floor has multiple spots of brown substance and appears soiled with food debris. During an interview on 6/4/24, at 10:00 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator and the Maintenance Director Employee E1 confirmed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from neglect for one of two residents (Resident R8), by failing to follow physicians orders during incontinence pad change and linen change. This was identified as past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of the United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 42 CFR §483.12. Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation defined neglect as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Review of the facility policy Abuse Protection dated 1/31/24, with a previous review date of 1/26/23, indicated that all resident have a right to be free from abuse, neglect, etc. and the facility is committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone providing services to the residents. Review of the clinical record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documentation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement effective bed mobility interventions as per physician order to promote resident safety, for one of two residents (Resident R8). This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Accidents and Incidents- Investigating and Recording, dated 1/31/24, indicated that all incidents and accidents occuring on the premises must be investigated and reported to the administrator. Regardless of the incident/accident, staff are to render immediate assistance, conduct an initial assessment and provide emergency interventions and if necessary, call 911. An employee witnessing an accident or incident involving a resident must report such occurrence to his or her supervisor immediately. Do not leave the victim unattended unless necessary to summon assistance. A witness statement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, water testing logs and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective Water Management Program for the prevention and control of water-borne contaminants, such as Legionella (a bacteria that may cause Legionnaires' Disease, a serious type of pneumonia). That the facility failed failed to provide surveillance data and analysis and provide documentation of the I/C program must include, at a minimum, a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, and visitors for three of eleven months (Mar, April, and May 2023). Findings include: The facility Water Management Program last reviewed on 1/26/23, indicated that the plan is to minimize risk for Legionella associated with the building water systems at Grove of [NAME]. Based on framework outlined in ASHRAE Standards. During an interview on 11/20/23, at 12:55 p.m., Maintenance Director Employee E1 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-22 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist was qualified with specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings include: Review of the individual identified as the facility Infection Control (I/C) Preventionist Registered Nurse (RN)Employee E7's personnel file documentation did not include indication of the specialized training required to be in the position. RN Employee E7 had been indicated as the I/C Preventionist since October. The prior Infection Control Preventionist was the current Director of Nursing (DON) who also had not attended specialized training in infection control. During an interview on 11/21/23, at 9:06 a.m., the DON and the current I/C Preventionist RN Employee E7 stated that neither of them have the credentials to be I/C Preventionist at this time. I/C Preventionist RN Employee E7 is currently working on getting the credentials. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.10(d) Resident care policies. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment on three of three nursing units (South, North, and Middle Nursing Units). Findings include: During observations on 11/21/23, from 8:16 a.m., through 11:50 a.m., the following was identified: Residents R34 and R40 had hole under the window. Residents R58 and R8 had holes behind Resident R58's bed. Residents R29 and R13 had broken wall areas behind the toilet. Residents R22 and R4 had broken tiles by the door and by the bathroom. Residents R1 and R27 toilet had appeared to have leaked and the flooring was stained and the toilet was in disrepair. Resident R1 stated that the toilet leaked and had not been replaced the facility has known about it. Residents R50 and R44 had broken areas of wall by the bathroom entrance. Residents R17 and R3 walls behind both beds had broken walls with holes and missing floor trim. Resident R53 had a empty bed in A bed with a soiled heavily soiled mattress. Residents R64 had a broken wall by the bathroom. Residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing staff annual performance evaluations based on the date of hire for four of four nurse aides (NA Employee E3, E4, E5, and E6). Findings include: During an interview on 11/21/23, at 10:45 a.m. Human Resource/Scheduler Employee E10 confirmed that the facilty has not completed annual performance reviews for NA Employee E3, E4, E5, and E6. During an interview on 11/22/23, at 11:30 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the facility failed to provide nursing staff annual performance evaluations based on the date of hire for four of four nurse aides. 28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(b)(c)(d) Staff development 28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that refrigerated medications are stored at proper temperatures and failed to monitor the medication refrigerator temperatures daily in one of one medication rooms. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications last reviewed on 1/26/23, indicated that medications are stored in the refrigerator at temperatures between 36 and 46 degrees and are monitored daily. During an observation of the Medication Room refrigerator on 11/20/23, at 8:30 a.m., the thermometer indicated the refrigerator was 50 degrees. During an interview on 11/20/23, at 8:30 a.m., Registered Nurse Employee E2 confirmed the refrigerator felt warm and would contact Maintenance to monitor the temperature after turning it down. During a review of the Medication Room Refrigerator temperature logs, the Director of Nursing stated that the facility only had logged temperatures for October 2023, and November of 2023, and there were dates of missed temperature monitoring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-22 · tag F0848 — patternProvide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's admission agreement and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a neutral and fair arbitration process by ensuring both the resident or his or her representative, and the facility agree on the selection of a neutral arbitrator. Findings include: Review of facility's admission Agreement packet, which contained the document Voluntary Arbitration Agreement indicated that Accordingly, any dispute arising out of relating to the provision of services by the Facility to the Resident, Resident's admission to the Facility, Resident's contracts with the Facility or the subject matter thereof, any breach of contract, including any dispute regarding the execution, validity or scope of this Arbitration Agreement or any of its clauses, will be resolved through arbitration administered by [name of arbitrator services company which the facility utilizes] and conducted pursuant to the [arbitrator] Rules of Procedure for Arbitration. The facility's arbitration agreement failed to provide for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program that was sufficient to meet the requirement for facility-provided annual nurse aide education. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated November 2023, indicated the facility will maintain an adequately trained and competent staff. The assessment further stated, Mandatory education is delivered and tracked by the Director of Education to ensure compliance with state and federal regulations. Review of the facility policy Staff Development Program dated 1/26/23, indicated all employees receive mandatory in-services annually. Review of the facility education calendar, with a listing of all scheduled in-services, included the following: -Abuse/Neglect/Elder Justice Act -Infection Control/Personal Protective Equipment -Psychosocial Needs -Dementia -Trauma Informed Care -Bloodborne Pathogens -Covid-19 -Customer Service -Resident ' s Rights -Accidents -Fire/Safety/Disasters -Hazard Communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on abuse, neglect, and exploitation for four of ten staff members (Employees E4, E6, E8, and E9). Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated November 2023, indicated the facility will maintain an adequately trained and competent staff. The assessment further stated, Mandatory education is delivered and tracked by the Director of Education to ensure compliance with state and federal regulations. Review of the facility policy Staff Development Program dated 1/26/23, indicated all employees receive mandatory inservices annually. Review of the facility policy Abuse Protection dated 1/26/23, indicated that mandated training/orientation on abuse protection, identification and reporting of abuse, stress management, dealing with violent behavior or catastrophic reaction, etc.; training is provided at time of hire, annually, and as needed. Review of the facility provided staff list indicated Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E4 was hired on 3/12/12. Review of NA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents, staff education records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct at least 12 hours of in-service education, within 12 months of their hire date anniversary, for nurse aides as required for four of four nurse aides (Employees E3, E4, E5, and E6). Finding include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated November 2023, indicated the facility will maintan an adequately trained and competent staff. The assessment further stated, Mandatory education is delivered and tracked by the Director of Education to ensure compliance with state and federal regulations. Review of the facility policy Staff Development Program dated 1/26/23, indicated nurse aides receive at least 12 hours of inservice per year. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) Employees E3, E4, E5, and E6's education records with hire date greater than 12 months revealed the following: NA Employee E3 had a hire date of 10/22/16, with 6.00 hours in-service education between 10/22/22, and 10/22/23. NA Employee E4 had a hire date of 3/12/12, with 6.00 hours in-service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of state laws, facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for covered individuals to report the suspicion and/or observation of staff to resident abuse or neglect for two of five residents reviewed (Resident R44 and R46). Findings include: Review of the Older Adult Protective Services Act of 11/6/87, amended by Act 1997-13, Chapter 7, Section 701, requires any employee or administrator of a facility who suspects abuse is mandated to report the abuse. All reports of abuse should be reported to the local area agency on aging and licensing agencies. Review of the facility's policy Abuse Protection dated 1/26/23, indicated Regardless of how minor an accident or incident may be, including injuries of unknown source, it must be reported to the department supervisor as soon as such accident/incident is discovered or when information of such accident/incident is learned. An investigation and witness statements…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for three of twelve residents (Resident R43, R48, and R61). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2023, indicated the following instructions: -Observation (Look-Back, Assessment) Period is the time period over which the resident's condition or status is captured by the MDS assessment. Most MDS items themselves require an observation period, such as 7 or 14 days, depending on the item. Since a day begins at 12:00 a.m. and ends at 11:59 p.m., the observation period must also cover this time period. A standard 7-day look-back period counts back from and includes the Assessment Reference Date (ARD+6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility document reviews, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that equipment was in safe operating condition for one of one crash carts and one of one AEDs (Automatic External Defibrillators). Findings include: Review of facility AED Policy dated 1/26/23, indicated the facility will conduct a daily check for battery status and monthly and annual equipment maintenance. During an observation of the facility crash cart (cart maintained with equipment used in cardiac emergencies) on 9/11/23, at 1:20 p.m. revealed a three-ring binder on the cart containing daily crash cart check list sheets for January through September 2023. Review of the check list sheet documentation revealed the cart was check the following number of days: January 2023: Two of 31 days. February 2023: Zero of 28 days. March 2023: Zero of 31 days. April 2023: Zero of 30 days. May 2023: One of 31 days. June 2023: Three of 30 days. July 2023: Zero of 31 days. August 2023: Two of 31 days. September 2023: Zero of 10 days. During a review of the items…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' medical information for two of two areas accessible to all staff (nutrition room and basement storage area). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Confidentiality dated 1/26/23, indicated that residents have the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and clinical records. During an observation of the nutrition room on 9/11/23, at 11:17 a.m. three boxes of loose paper, with resident information on them were observed on the floor. During an interview on 9/11/23, at 11:25 a.m. Registered Nurse Employee E3 confirmed that the paperwork was stored in the nutrition room due to lack of space, and the nutrition room door does not have a lock. During an observation of the basement storage area on 9/11/23, at 2:00 p.m. numerous boxes of loose paper, with resident information on them were observed on the floor. During an interview on 9/11/23, at 2:40 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, sanitary, and homelike environment for two of two nursing units (North Wing and South Wing). Findings include: The facility Resident Environment policy dated 1/26/23, indicated the facility will provide and environment that is safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike. During multiple observations made on 9/11/23, from 9:30 a.m. through 2:30 p.m. indicated the following: 9:40 a.m. - Resident R1's call light cord was extremely soiled, his Flextouch (machine used to assist in preventing swelling) was placed directly on the floor, and the garbage can exterior was soiled. 9:45 a.m. the North Wing shower room near room [ROOM NUMBER] had refuse on the floor, boxes of supplies and sneakers in the tub, missing tiles surrounding the drain the shower area, four soap dispensers on the stacked up, with no usable soap dispenser on the wall. 10:40 a.m. - Resident R3' window screen is not installed correctly,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident clinical records and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that appropriate treatment and services were ordered and/or provided for two of three residents with a urinary catheter (Resident R1 and R2). Findings include: Review of the Centers for Disease Control guidance Guideline for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections updated 6/6/19, indicated to not rest the collecting bag on the floor. Review of admission record indicated that Resident R1 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 8/14/23, indicated diagnoses of chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function), neurogenic bladder (bladder problems due to disease or injury of the nervous system involved in the control of urination), and muscle weakness. Section H - Bladder and Bowel indicated the utilization of an indwelling catheter. During an observation on 9/11/23, at 9:40…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly dispose of expired and/or opened medical supplies in one of one medication rooms and one of one basement storage areas. Findings include: During an observation of the facility medication room on [DATE], at 1:15 p.m. of the facility medication room, the following was observed: -Three suction catheter kits, with expiration dates of [DATE]. -Three nasal canula sets with expiration dates of [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE]. -Two IV start kits with expiration dates of [DATE]. -One [NAME] suction [NAME] with an expiration date of 8/2018. -One package of calcium alginate rope with an expiration date of 4/2022. -One container of topical yeast infection powder, open and undated. During an observation of the basement storage area on [DATE], at 2:00 p.m. the following was observed stored directly on the basement floor: -Boxes of COVID test kits. -Kangaroo e-pump sets (bag and tubing for tube-feeding). -Box of saline…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to schedule a neurosurgery follow-up appointment timely, which caused a delay in that .for one of two residents (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2019, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment). The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact 8-12: moderately impaired 0-7: severe impairment Review of Resident R1's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) dated 4/21/23, indicated diagnoses of diabetes (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time), muscle weakness, and the need for assistance in personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain essential equipment was maintained properly for one of one ice makers and one of two shower rooms (Left-side) Findings include: During an observation of the ice maker room on 8/18/23, at 11:00 a.m. noted: -Numerous fruit flies in the room. -The ice access door not attached, and placed on top of the ice maker. A large black garbage bag was attached to the top of the opening to cover the access to the ice. -Water pitches, paper towels, plastic bags, and other refuse behind the ice maker. -Styrofoam cups, disposable gloves, food waste, and other debris under the ice maker. The ice maker drain was resting directly on a Styrofoam cup, preventing the required air gap. The water from the ice maker drain was prevented by the refuse from entering the drain, wetting the surrounding cabinets and debris. -The cabinet to the left of the ice maker was severely water damaged, with multiple areas broken away, including the cabinet door. Mildew was present on the remaining cabinet and the multiple broken…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-01-30 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility assessment, personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) for ten of ten staff members (Employee E9, E10, E11, E12, E13, E14, E15, E16, E17and E18).Findings include:Review of S483.95(d) Quality assurance and performance improvement. A facility must include as part of its QAPI program mandatory training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program as set forth at S 483.75.Review of the Facility Assessment most recently reviewed 1/7/26, listed under the training topics QAPI is not identified.Review of the facility policy Staff Development Program last reviewed on 1/7/26, with a previous review date of 1/9/25, did not identify QAPI as a topic for orientation and annual trainings required.Physical Therapy Aide Employee E9 had a hire date of 9/15/16, failed to have QAPI training in-service between 1/17/25, and 1/30/26.Environmental Services Employee E10 had a hire date of 2/22/06,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of regulatory requirements, facility policy, facility documents, personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Effective Communication for two of ten employees (E9 and E15). Findings include:Review of Federal regulatory requirements for S483.95(a) Communication. A facility must include effective communications as mandatory training for direct care staff. Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE], with a previous review date of 1/9/25, did not include Effective Communication in the list of staff training topics.Review of the facility policy Staff Development Program last reviewed on 1/7/26, with a previous review date of 1/9/25, did not include Effective Communication in the list of topics for staff training.Physical Therapy Aide Employee E9 had a hire date of 9/15/16, failed to have Effective Communication in-service between 1/17/25, and 1/30/26.Nurse Aide Employee E15 had a hire date of 7/31/23, failed to have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-11-22 · tag F0941 — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Communication training to direct care facility staff. Finding include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated November 2023, indicated the facility will maintain an adequately trained and competent staff. The assessment further stated, Mandatory education is delivered and tracked by the Director of Education to ensure compliance with state and federal regulations. Review of the facility policy Staff Development Program dated 1/26/23, indicated all employees receive mandatory inservices annually. Review of facility education documents revealed the facility failed to offer Communication education to its direct care staff members. During an interview on 11/22/23, at 11:30 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide Communication training to direct care facility staff. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee. 28 Pa. Code: 201.20(c) Staff Development.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-11-22 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training to facility staff. Finding include: Review of the Facility Assessment dated November 2023, indicated the facility will maintain an adequately trained and competent staff. The assessment further stated, Mandatory education is delivered and tracked by the Director of Education to ensure compliance with state and federal regulations. Review of the facility policy Staff Development Program dated 1/26/23, indicated all employees receive mandatory inservices annually. Review of facility education documents revealed the facility failed to offer QAPI education to its staff members. During an interview on 11/22/23, at 11:30 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to provide QAPI training to facility staff. 28 Pa. Code: 201.14(a) Responsibility of Licensee. 28 Pa. Code: 201.20(c) Staff Development.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$20,914 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $20,914 — penalty dated 2023-08-23
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to KADIMA HEALTHCARE GROUP — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 2.5 | +2.5 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CIBC BANK USA | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2024 |
| MORRIS, DANIEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| STRAUSS, JONATHAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| KADIMA HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| PINNACLE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| MUTNANSKY, MELODY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| BRAND SONNENSCHINE LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| WASHINGTON REALTY MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| ROMEO, MICHELLE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 95% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $994K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395679. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.