Avir at Bryan
2333 Manor Dr, Bryan, TX 77802 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 81 certified beds · (979) 821-7330 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Mar 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (99%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.0% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.8% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 0.0% | 14.0% | 16.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.8% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.7% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.3% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.5% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.3% | 88.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.5% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.6% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.47 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.03 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 278 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 55.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.1%CMS range 50.9–65.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.7%CMS range 10.7–16.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.6–10.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 76.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 99% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-07-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed unnecessary drugs. The facility failed to ensure PT/INR laboratory tests (to measure blood clotting time and thus ensure safe blood levels of the anticoagulant, warfarin) were obtained weekly as ordered for Resident #1 on 04/14/25, 04/28/25, 05/05/25, 05/12/25, 05/26/25, 06/09/25, 06/16/25 and 06/30/25. Resident #1 was presented with multiple, unexplained bruising to her face, tongue, and extremities on 07/05/25 and was hospitalized for a warfarin overdose on 07/07/25. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 07/09/25. While the IJ was removed on 07/11/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with the potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk of adverse effects from high-risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-07-30 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure laboratory services were provided or obtained to meet the needs of its residents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for laboratory services. The facility failed to ensure PT/INR laboratory tests were obtained weekly as ordered for Resident #1 on 04/14/25, 04/28/25, 05/05/25, 05/12/25, 05/26/25, 06/09/25, 06/16/25 and 06/30/25. Resident #1 was presented with multiple, unexplained bruising to her face, tongue, and extremities on 07/05/25 and was hospitalized for a warfarin overdose on 07/07/25. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 07/09/25. While the IJ was removed on 07/11/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with the potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk of adverse effects from high-risk medication such as bruising, uncontrolled bleeding, and death. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation.1. The facility failed to ensure stored foods in the 3-door reach in refrigerator located in the kitchen was labeled and dated to include the use by date or prepared/ pulled date. 2. The facility failed to ensure foods were stored in a manner as to prevent contamination (sealed). 3. The facility failed to ensure bread in the dry storage area was sealed in a manner to prevent contamination. 4. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff maintained a sanitary environment (scoops left inside dry storage container of sugar, soiled dry storage container tops, soiled interior of the reach in refrigerator). These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness and cross-contamination.The findings include: During an initial tour of the kitchen on 05/30/26 at 12:11 PM revealed the following:In the (3-door) reach in refrigerator revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0572 — patternGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed orally of their rights for 10 confidential residents reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to ensure residents were provided with ongoing communication of their rights during their stay at the facility. This failure could place residents at risk for a decreased quality of life and awareness and execution of their rights.The findings included:A record review of resident council minutes indicated resident rights were not reviewed or discussed for the resident council meetings dated 05/22/2025, 07/16/2025, 08/19/2025, 09/16/2025, 12/08/2025, 01/08/2026, 02/12/2026, 03/11/2026 or 04/08/2026. The resident council minutes for October and November 2025 were not included in the records.During an observation on 05/12/2026 at 7:33 AM of the facility bulletin board revealed the resident rights posting was observed on the wall. During a confidential interview at an undisclosed date and time, 10 confidential residents indicated staff had not discussed or reviewed their rights…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 3 of 17 (Resident #19 Resident #51 and Resident #61 ) residents reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide a sufficient variety of activities, including evening and weekend activities to meet resident interests and psychosocial needs. This failure could place residents at risks of boredom, depression, behavior, diminished quality of life and decreased cognitive function.Findings included:Review of Resident #19's face sheet dated 5/12/2026 reflected an admission date of 12/12/2023 with diagnoses of major depressive disorder (sadness), psychotic disorder with hallucinations (seeing, hearing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to make sure that drugs are stored in locked compartments and only authorized persons have access for 3 of 9 medication carts (MC #1, MC #2, and MC #3) reviewed for drug storage and labeling.The facility failed to ensure MC #1, MC #2 and MC #3 were locked, medications secured, and not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitors.This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to medications, decreased effectiveness of medication, or missing medications.Findings included:Observation of the initial walk through of the facility on 05/12/2026 at 5:54a.m., revealed the ADON left MC #1 and MC #2 unlocked and unattended. Observation of the initial walk through of the facility on 05/12/2026 at 6:01a.m., revealed RN H left MC #3 unlocked and unattended. During an interview with the ADON on 05/12/2026 at 6:03a.m., she said she had been trained on medication storage. She said the policy for the medication carts was the carts were to be always locked. She said the person on the medication cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that included, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for 3 of 3 residents (Resident # 17, #28, and #93) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship program.1. The facility failed to follow antibiotic stewardship policy by failing to include all required information per facility policy on their infection tracking log for Resident #17, Resident #28 and Resident #93.2. The facility failed to follow antibiotic stewardship policy for Resident #17, Resident #28, and Resident #93 by not ensuring an infection surveillance assessment was performed for all antibiotic orders.This deficient practice could place residents at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use, and increased multi drug resistant organisms.Findings included:Review of Resident #17's face sheet, dated 05/14/2026, reflected a [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 6 of 8 confidential residents reviewed for homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure resident's wheelchairs were cleaned, free from dirt and debris. This failure could place residents at risk of diminished quality of life by living in an unsanitary and uncomfortable environment .Findings included: During a confidential interview at an undisclosed date and time, 1 confidential resident indicated the wheelchair locks do not work, the chairs are filthy and the staff never clean them. Seven additional residents of the 10 confidential residents stated their chairs have not been cleaned, one stated she had a toileting accident one day in her chair, and it did not get cleaned. Observation on 5/14/2026 at 10:34 AM of 8 wheelchairs revealed 6 wheelchairs to be unclean with significant accumulation of dust, hair, and other debris particles on the frames, between seat cushions and wheels of the wheelchairs. In an interview conducted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 25 residents (Resident #29 and Resident #63) reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to ensure CNA D knocked on Resident #63's door before entering the resident's room.The facility failed to ensure staff assisted Resident #29 with removing his hospital gown and putting on his clothing as preferred on .5/13/2026 and 5/14/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of feeling like their privacy was invaded, cause emotional distress, diminished feelings of self-worth and/or diminished quality of life. Findings Included:1. Record review of Resident #29's MDS Assessment, dated 03/17/2026, reflected he was an [AGE] year-old male, admitted [DATE] with a BIMS score of 03, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident's diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 2 (Residents #63 and #65) of 8 residents reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. The facility failed to ensure that the Resident Identifier sheet and corresponding survey containing PHI of Residents #63 and #65 were not left in the public survey binder in the lobby of the facility. The failure could place the residents at risk of their medical information being exposed to unauthorized individuals.Findings included: Record review of Resident #63's Face Sheet, dated 05/13/2026, reflected a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: dementia (A group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life.), Diabetes Mellitus (A condition results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar.), and hypertension (High pressure in the arteries…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the PASRR program for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #38) reviewed for PASRR assessments. The facility did not complete a 1012 form (used by the state nursing facilities to review residents with a negative PASRR Level 1 screening and determine if further evaluation for mental illness or dementia is needed) to update resident #38's PASRR Level 1 with the newly evident mental health diagnosis.The facility did not refer Resident #38 to the appropriate state-designated mental health authority for review when she received a new diagnosis of Major Depressive disorder, recurrent severe (condition where person experiences repeated episodes of very intense sadness, loss of interest, low energy, and feelings of hopelessness) during her stay at the facility on 03/06/2025.The failures could place residents who had a mental illness at risk of not being evaluated and receive needed PASRR services.Findings included:Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I residents with a mental illness was completed correctly and were provided with a PASRR Level II assessment for one (Resident #7) of 8 residents reviewed for PASRR assessments.The facility failed to ensure the MDS RN entered Resident #7's PASRR Level l correctly into SimpleLTC portal (portal used by nursing facilities to manage resident's information) the PASRR entered did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although diagnosis was present upon admission. This failure could place all residents who had a mental illness at risk for not receiving needed assessment, care, and services to meet their needs.Findings included: Record review of Resident #7's Annual MDS Assessment, dated 02/10/26, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His BIMS score was 05, indicative his cognitive skills were significantly impaired. His diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs for 1 of 17 (Resident #23) residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure staff did not leave medication with Resident #23 when there was not a self-administer assessment completed. This failure could place residents at risk of not accurately receiving their medications, which could cause a change in condition.Findings Included: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet dated 05/14/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #23 had diagnoses which included seizures, difficulty in walking, anxiety (feeling of uneasiness or worry), major depressive disorder (mental health disorder characterized by persistent depressed mood), headaches, cancer, and hypertension (high blood pressure).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 dining rooms reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA D washed and sanitized her hands between passing breakfast trays to the residents. The facility failed to ensure CNA E washed and sanitized her hands between passing breakfast trays to the residents. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: During an observation of dining services for breakfast meal services on 05/12/2026 at 7:44a.m., revealed CNA D and CNA E did not wash or sanitize their hands while passing meal trays to residents in the dining room. During an interview with the DON on 05/14/2026 at 10:02a.m., she said she had been trained on hand hygiene. She said the policy for hand hygiene during meal services was staff were to wash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt resolution of grievances regarding the resident's right to file a grievance for 4 of 4 confidential residents reviewed for grievances.The facility failed to notify residents in writing of the findings and actions of the grievances they filed. This failure could affect resident's right to a written decision regarding the resolution of their grievance.Findings included:Review of the March 2026 grievance log revealed 17 grievances. The column titled Disposition of Grievance* revealed the nature of the grievance for each grievance. The column titled Date of Written Decision was left blank for each grievance. The March 2026 grievance log revealed * Disposition of Grievance: Confirmed/Not Confirmed, Resolved/Not Resolved across the bottom of the log.Review of the March 2026 grievances revealed 10 of the 17 grievances did not have the section titled Findings of Investigation completed.During an interview and record review on 04/02/2026 at 01:15 PM, the ADON stated she had signed 12 of the 17 grievances for March…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drug and biological) to meet the needs of each resident for one of four residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medications and pharmacy services.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had his prescribed clonidine (a medication for high blood pressure) 0.3mg/24HR transdermal (applied to the skin) patches available for administration.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefits of the medication and symptomatic changes in vital signs.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/01/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: chronic kidney disease, unspecified (the gradual loss of kidney function), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drug and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for one of four residents (Resident #2) reviewed for medications and pharmacy services, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's physician ordered medications Bisacodyl, lactobacillus, and polyethylene glycol prescribed for his Ogilvie syndrome. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of not receiving therapeutic dosage of medications and symptomatic changes in vital signs.Findings included:Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 03/11/2026 reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Ogilvie syndrome (An intestinal pseudo-obstruction feels like something is physically blocking your bowels. But they aren't actually obstructed because they're paralyzed.),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from exploitation and misappropriation of property for one of four residents (Resident #1) reviewed for misappropriation of resident property. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from CNA A, who at some point during her employment from 10/30/2025 through 12/09/2025 took Resident #1's debit card and incurred at least 36 unauthorized charges from 11/29/2025 through 02/08/2026. This failure placed residents at risk of misappropriation of property and financial loss. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 11/10/2025 reflected a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: dementia (A group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life.), Diabetes Mellitus (A condition results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar.), and hypertension (High pressure in the arteries (vessels that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents are offered a therapeutic diet when there is a nutritional problem and the health care provider orders a therapeutic diet for one of four residents (Resident #2) reviewed for physician ordered supplements. The failed to ensure Resident #2 received his physician ordered supplement ensure clear with his lunch meal. This failure placed residents at risk for weight loss, malnutrition, and poor quality of life.Findings included: Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 03/11/2026 reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Ogilvie syndrome (An intestinal pseudo-obstruction feels like something is physically blocking your bowels. But they aren't actually obstructed because they're paralyzed.), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (Hemiplegia is a symptom that involves one-sided paralysis. Hemiplegia affects either the right or left side of your body.) following a cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids must be administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for parenteral fluids The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's PICC line dressing was changed per physician orders. This failure could place residents with PICC line dressing at risk for potential infections.Findings included: Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 09/04/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Staphylococcal arthritis, left knee, (infection of knee joint) sepsis (occurs when your immune system has a dangerous reaction to an infection) and methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection. Review of Resident #2's admission MDS dated [DATE] reflected she was assessed to have a BIMS score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility must provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 4 medication carts reviewed (station 1 medication cart). The facility failed to ensure on 09/04/2025 that expired medications (one bottle of Melatonin 1mg expired 08/2025 and one bottle of Aspirin 325 mg expired 08/2025) were removed from the station one medication cart once expired. This failure could place residents who received medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic effect of the medications.Findings Included: Observation on 09/04/2025 at 2:30 pm of station one medication cart revealed a bottle of Melatonin 1mg expired 08/2025 and one bottle of Aspirin 325 mg expired 08/2025. In an interview on 09/04/2025 at 2:35 pm, LVN A stated it was the medication aide's responsibility to ensure expired medication are not on the cart, but they currently did not have one and since he was passing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure storage of drugs and biologicals used in the facility for 1 of 4 medication carts reviewed (station 1 medication cart). The facility failed to ensure medications were stored and used in an orderly manner to ensure the liquid did not run down the sides of the bottle causing it to be sticky on the sides of the bottle and the bottle was stuck to the bottom of the medication cart drawer. This failure could place residents who received medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic effect of the medications. Findings Included: Observation on 09/04/2025 at 2:30 pm of station one medication cart revealed a bottle of lactulose in the medication cart drawer which was sticky on the sides of the bottle and the bottle was stuck to bottom of cart. In an interview on 09/04/2025 at 2:35 pm, LVN A stated the lactulose bottle was sticky and should have been cleaned. In an interview on 09/04/2025 at 3:00 PM the DON stated that staff should check the medication prior to administration to ensure the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure LVN A followed standard precautions during wound care on 09/04/2025 for Resident #1's RLE stasis ulcer, when he failed to perform hand hygiene prior to wound care, and between glove changes and failed to use gloves that were not contaminated. This failure could place residents at risk for developing wound infections and risk for healthcare associated cross-contamination and infections.Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 09/04/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: alcohol dependence, major depression and muscle wasting.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-30 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was posted to include: facility name, the current date, the total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift for, registered nurses, licensed practical nurses or licensed vocational nurses, certified nurse aides, and resident census for 1 of 1 day (07/09/25) reviewed for posted nurse staffing information. The facility failed to have daily nurse staffing posted on 07/09/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not knowing how many nursing staff should be present in the facility. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was posted to include: facility name, the current date, the total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift for, registered nurses, licensed practical nurses or licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to prevent a diversion of Resident #1's Modafinil 100 MG tablet, 30 tablets received from the pharmacy on 06/15/2025 and reported missing on 06/16/2025. LVN A and LVN B failed to conduct shift change narcotics medication count on the morning of 06/16/2025. These failures could place residents at risk for medication error and delay therapy. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, printed 06/26/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included sleep apnea (a common sleep disorder where breathing repeatedly stops and starts during sleep), unspecified, obstructive sleep apnea (a common sleep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 3 of 14 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) reviewed for medication administration, treatment administration, and wound administration. 1. The facility failed to complete Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR), Treatment Administration Record (TAR), Wound Administration Record (WAR), and Controlled Drug Record for Norco 5-325 MG, Norco 10-325 MG, Pregabalin, tramadol PRN, tramadol three times a day and wound cleanse treatments. 2. The facility failed to accurately document Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR), Treatment Administration Record (TAR), Wound Administration Record (WAR), and Controlled Drug Record for Norco 5-325 MG, Norco 10-325 MG, Pregabalin, tramadol PRN, tramadol three times a day and wound cleanse treatments. 3. The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan to meet the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 3 (Resident #13, Resident #53, and Resident #212) of 12 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #13's refusal to be weighted monthly. The facility failed to develop and implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #53's refusal to sit up out of bed at a 90-degree angle during all meals. The facility failed to develop and implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #212's use of a CPAP machine. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate care and treatment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #13's Face Sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Nontoxic Multinodular Goiter (an enlarged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for three (Resident #5, Resident #209, Resident #212) of five residents reviewed for bathing. The facility failed to provide showers to Resident #5, Resident #209, Resident #212 in compliance with their shower schedules. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a decline in their sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and at risk for skin breakdown. Findings included: Review of Resident #5's comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-traumatic brain dysfunction high blood pressure, stroke, high blood lipids, seizure disorder, depression, partial weakness on one side of the body, dysphagia, abnormal posture, muscle weakness. Resident #5 had a BIMS score of 08, which indicated moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's nourishment refrigerators for 3 (Nourishment room [ROOM NUMBER], #3, and #4) of 5 nourishment room refrigerators reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to ensure the nourishment room refrigerator temperature logs were maintained in dining room [ROOM NUMBER], and nourishment refrigerators #3 and #4. 2. The facility failed to ensure the dining room's refrigerator's cleanliness was maintained. 3. The facility failed to ensure the nourishment refrigerator in unit 1 was free of pests. These failures could place residents at risk for health complications, foodborne illnesses and decreased a quality of life. Findings include: Observation of the unit 3 and 4 dining room's refrigerator on 3/25/2025 at 12:18 PM revealed a lone sign posted to the front of the refrigerator notifying residents,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment within 14 calendar days after admission as required for 2 (Resident #209 and Resident #212) of 5 residents records reviewed for comprehensive assessment accuracy and timing. Resident #209 and Resident #212 did not have completed admission/comprehensive MDS assessments within 14 days following their admissions to the facility. This deficient practice could result in newly admitted residents not receiving the proper care required to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Review of Resident #209's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the following diagnoses: acute kidney failure, altered mental status, primary osteoarthritis of knee (degenerative joint disease that results from breakdown of joint cartilage and underlying bones), low potassium, hyperosmolality (loss of water fluid).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident is given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living for 1 of 27 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for ADL activities The facility failed to ensure Resident #18 was monitored for assistance needs and failed to ensure she was positioned in a manner that would allow her to feed herself while in bed. This failure could place residents at risk for weight loss, ADL decline and poor self-esteem. Findings included: Review of Resident #18's face sheet dated 03/26/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses dementia (A group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life.), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Is a common, preventable, and treatable disease that is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms like progressive breathlessness and cough.) and anorexia (an eating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #5) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure MA F waited for Resident #5 to consume her nighttime medications before leaving the resident's room. This failure could affect residents by putting them at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefits of their medications. Findings included: Review of Resident #5's comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-traumatic brain dysfunction, high blood pressure, stroke, high blood lipids, seizure disorder, depression, partial weakness on one side of the body, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), abnormal posture, and muscle weakness. Resident #5 had a BIMS score of 08, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The assessment stated none of the above under swallowing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #212) of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to have a physician's order and a plan of care for the use of a CPAP machine and a nebulizer for Resident #212 This failure could place residents at risk of receiving incorrect or inadequate treatment and could result in a health decline or infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #212's undated face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the following diagnoses: unspecified dementia, diabetes, sleep apnea (breathing disorder caused by repeated interruptions during sleep), high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), congestive heart failure, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Record review of Resident #212's care plan initiated 3/04/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, and dispensing of routine drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1of 4 resident reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident #213) The facility failed to ensure Resident #213 ordered Thiamine (a B1 vitamin) and Ergocalciferol (a prescription strength vitamin D) medication was available for administration on 03/26/25. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving medications as prescribed and a decline in health status Findings included: Record review of Resident #213's face sheet reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Sepsis (a blood infection), Anxiety, Myasthenia Gravis (a chronic autoimmune disorder that affects the neuromuscular junction, the point where nerves meet the muscle) and mild protein calorie malnutrition. Record review of Resident #213's comprehensive care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 7.69% based on 2 out of 26 opportunities, which involved 1 of 4 residents (Resident #213) observed during medication administration reviewed for medication error. The facility failed to ensure Resident #213's ordered Thiamine (a B1 vitamin) and Ergocalciferol (a prescription strength vitamin D) medication was available for administration on 03/26/25. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered Findings included: Record review of Resident #213s face sheet reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Sepsis (a blood infection), Anxiety, Myasthenia Gravis (a chronic autoimmune disorder that affects the neuromuscular junction, the point where nerves meet the muscle) and mild protein calorie malnutrition. Record review of Resident #213s comprehensive care plan dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 1 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the medication cart was locked and medications were secure and not accessible to other staff, resident, or visitors while unattended by MA E on 3/26/25 at 10:30am. This failure could have resulted in harm due to unauthorized access to medications, biologicals, and needles. Findings included: Observation on 03/26/2025 at 10:30am MA E left the medication cart unlocked outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] in the hallway over the counter medication Oscal (a calcium supplement) and Vitamin D supplement were left out on top of cart while she administered medications inside of the room. In an interview on 3/26/25 at 10:50am MA E stated she had worked at the facility x 1 year. She stated she has received training related for medication administration from her ADON and DON. She stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for one of two medication aides (MA E) observed for infection control practices MA E failed to sanitize her hand, put on gloves prior to administration of eye drops to Resident #213 on 03/26/25 at 10:30am. This failure could place residents at risk for healthcare associated cross-contamination and infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #213's face sheet reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Sepsis (a blood infection), Anxiety, Myasthenia Gravis (a chronic autoimmune disorder that affects the neuromuscular junction, the point where nerves meet the muscle) and Glaucoma (an increased pressure inside the eye). Record review of Resident #213's history and physical dated 03/21/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rails, assess the resident for risk of entrapment, review the risk and benefits, and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 3 out of 6 residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for bedrails. The facility failed to assess and get signed consents for Residents #1, #2, and #3 prior to installing bed rails. This deficient practice could affect residents who utilized bed rails by placing them at risk for unintended entrapment of the head, neck, or limbs, restraints, and injuries. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 08/28/24 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of polyosteoarthritis (is a diagnosis of having arthritis in five or more joints at the same time), muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, altered mental status and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-31 · tag F0555 — patternHonor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor the residents right to choose his or her attending physician for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) and the entire facility reviewed for resident rights. The facility did not honor Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5's right to choose his/her primary care physician after the facility terminated their Medical Director's agreement and changed the attending physician without notice to the residents or their representatives effective 07/04/24. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of decreased quality of care and treatment due to their lack of free choice for their attending physician care while in the facility. Findings included: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 07/30/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Parkinson's Disease (brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's medications (1 box of 20, 600mg Mucinex tablets and 1 single 10mg Baclofen tablet) were stored and locked in an area not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitors. 2. The facility failed to dispose of medication properly- 1 loose pill (Docusate sodium 50 mg tablet) was found in the private dining room trash can. These failures could place residents at risk of injury and result in residents not receiving doses of medication as well as not being maintained at their best therapeutic level. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/24/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (a disease where the immune system attacks the protective layer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to report incidents of injury of unknown sources to HHSC's state office within 24 hours for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for unwitnessed falls. The facility failed to report allegations to the State Agency when Resident #1 had an unwitnessed fall and was sent out to a local hospital. This failure placed residents at risk of further injuries not being reported timely for a thorough prompt investigation to be conducted immediately. Findings Included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 05/16/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing(broken hip), dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere(memory loss), and hypertension(high blood pressure). Review of Resident #1's care plan was not available as the incident occurred less than 48 hours after admission. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the residents environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible in 14 of 50 resident room sinks (room [ROOM NUMBER], 226, 230, 303, 307, 310, 313, 317 319, 320, 325 329, 335, and 342) and 2 of 2 common shower areas (2nd and 3rd floor) reviewed for hot water. The facility failed to maintain resident use hot water at safe and comfortable temperatures. Resident use hot water was not reliably controlled and ranged from between 118.4 F and 129.4 in reviewed locations. This failure could place residents at risk for sustaining scalding injuries when using resident-use / resident accessible hot water. Findings included: Observation on 02/07/2024 at 8:16 AM, the hot water from the sink in room [ROOM NUMBER] was checked with a digital thermometer and found to be 122 F. Observation on 02/07/2024 at 8:46 AM, the hot water from the sink in room [ROOM NUMBER] was checked with a digital thermometer and found to be 123.1 F.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for two of four residents reviewed for catheter care (Resident #46 and Resident #48). A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #46's catheter was secured to his body with a catheter secure device per the care plan and physician's orders. B) The facility failed to ensure Resident 48's catheter was secured to his body with a catheter secure device per the physician's orders and facility policy. This failure to secure catheters placed residents with urinary catheters at risk for traumatic removal and catheter acquired infections. Findings included: A) Review of Resident #46's Face Sheet dated 02/07/2024 reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's Disease (A type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior. This is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #18) of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #18's Nebulizer tubing and mouthpiece, which includes the nebulizing chamber (unit into which liquid medicine is converted into aerosol or mist by the pressurized air pumped through the tubing), were dated and replaced every seven (7) days. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #18's Nebulizer mouthpiece was bagged when not in use. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory compromise and infection. Findings included: Review of Resident #18's Face Sheet dated 02/06/2024 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: Severe Dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GULF COAST LTC PARTNERS — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 2.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BURLESON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/15/2014 |
| CHAPMAN, WAYNE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 05/01/2000 |
| 2333 MANOR DR OPCO, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| JIAN, PETER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/05/2026 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/05/2026 |
| GOLDBERGER, FAIGY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/05/2026 |
| 2333 MANOR DR PROPERTY OWNER, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2025 |
| STARKEY, GEIGGI | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675887. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.