Avir At Madisonville
600 Bacon Street, Madisonville, TX 77864 · For profit - Partnership · 90 certified beds · (936) 348-9097 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,827 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-03)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.0% | 15.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.3% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.4% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.0% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.7% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.4% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.7% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.78 | 2.17 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.67 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.2–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.6–12.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.42 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 58.5 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and ensure each resident received adequate supervision for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not elope from the front door of the facility and had adequate supervision. This failure could place residents at risk of accidents, and injuries due to a lack of supervision. The noncompliance was identified as PNC IJ. The IJ began on 08/12/2024 to 08/24/2024/ and ended on 08/24/2024. The facility had implemented actions that corrected the deficient practice prior to the beginning of the investigation. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated, 08/18/2024, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 was discharged from facility on 08/13/2024. Resident #1 had diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-01-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had comfortable and safe temperature levels for two of four halls, in that: The facility failed to ensure the facility was maintained at a comfortable and safe temperature level and maintain a temperature range of 71 to 81°F, when 5 of the 12 AC/Heater units were not functioning (since May 2022) and the mobile air units put into place on B and D halls were not able to heat the halls or resident rooms and the temperature in resident rooms was between 56-66 degrees. This failure placed residents at risk for loss of body heat, risk for hypothermia and an uncomfortable environment leading to a decreased quality of life. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 12/27/2022. While the IJ was removed on 01/02/2023, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy scoped at a pattern, due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-01-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. 1.The facility failed to ensure that an emergency transfer agreement was in place in the event an evacuation was necessary (The facility did not have operational heating units on 2 of the 4 halls and did not have enough rooms to move all the residents to rooms with functional heating units). 2. The facility failed to ensure a facility assessment was completed to determine what resources were necessary to care for the residents or to ensure staff were trained on emergency procedures in the event a evacuation was necessary. These failures placed residents at risk of not having necessary resources and services available to them during day-to-day operations and emergencies which could result in lack of care, exposure to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be treated with respect and dignity for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for dignity. Housekeeper A failed to speak to Resident #1 in a way that promoted her dignity and self-worth. This failure could place residents at risk of a decline in their sense of dignity, level of satisfaction with life, and feeling of self-worth.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/15/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of generalized anxiety disorder ( a chronic mental health condition characterized by persistent, excessive, and uncontrollable worry about everyday things), major depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psychotic features ( a chronic mental health condition with the following symptoms: hopelessness, persistent sadness, and extreme fatigue without any psychotic - a mental state characterized by a severe loss of contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide A wore a beard guard when standing over clean dishes in the kitchen. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness.Findings included: Observation on 1/27/2026 at 8:45 am revealed Dietary Aide A was not wearing a beard guard. He was standing in the dishwashing room section of the kitchen over the clean plates. He had facial hair approximately 3-4 inches long around his chin. In an interview on 01/27/2026 at 8:50 am, Dietary Aide A stated he was expected to wear a beard guard anytime he was in the kitchen area. He stated if hair fell onto plates and the hair transferred to residents' food there was a possibility a resident may become ill with some type of stomach issues (when asked what type of stomach issues he did not respond to the question). He stated germs were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for one of two medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart A was locked and medications were secure and not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitors. This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to prescriptions, biologicals, and over-the-counter medications.Findings included:Observation on 01/27/2026 at 8:35 am revealed an unlocked medication cart (Medication Cart A) in front of one of the nurse's desks. The back of the medication cart was against the nurse's station. RN B was inside the nurse's station leaning against the desk with her back facing the medication cart. The medication cart's locking mechanism was protruding outward. The drawers of the medication cart were easily opened and the state surveyor captured photos.In an interview on 01/27/2026 at 8:40 am RN B stated she thought she had locked the medication cart before she walked inside the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 3 of 10 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3's call lights were within reach on 05/20/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of their needs not being met. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 05/20/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: Rheumatoid arthritis (chronic autoimmune disease that causes inflammation and damage to the joints), muscle weakness (decrease ability of muscles to contract and move), and unspecified dementia mild without behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #4) reviewed for personal privacy and confidentiality of records. The facility failed to ensure the LVN provided privacy by closing the laptop and leaving the laptop unattended in the hallway which displayed Resident #4's information on 05/20/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of having medical information personal or care instructions exposed to others and misuse of personal information. The findings included: Record review of Resident #4's admission record, dated 05/20/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included: unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction (having lingering problems or conditions as a result of a stroke), muscle weakness , muscle wasting and atrophy (a condition where muscle tissue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 4 of 10 residents (Resident #21, Resident #65, Resident #10 and Resident #7) and 1 of 1 shower rooms (A Hall) reviewed for resident rights. A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #21's room and shower was clean. B) The facility failed to ensure the A Hall shower room was clean and free of mold, trash and soiled washcloths. C) The facility failed to ensure Resident # 65's tray table was in good repair. D) The facility failed to ensure there were intact privacy curtains in Resident #10 and Resident #7's room. These failures could place residents at risk of not having a safe, clean, sanitary, comfortable and homelike environment. Findings included: A) Record review of Resident #21's undated Face Sheet reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Malignant neoplasm of Larynx (cancerous cells in the voice box), Tracheostomy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 4 of 4 Residents (Residents #65, Resident 56, Resident #22, and Resident #24) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #65, Resident #56, Resident #22, and Resident #24's nails were trimmed, cleaned, and filed. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #65's undated Face Sheet reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction (stroke where part of the brain is damaged or dies due to lack of blood supply). Record review of Resident #65's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected he had a BIMS score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with State and Federal Laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments, and had current expiration dates for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms, 1 of 2 medication carts (A Hall medication aide cart), and 1 of 1 treatment carts reviewed for medication storage. A) The facility failed to ensure two medications in the storage room behind the nurse's station were not expired and one medication in the A Hall cart was not expired. B) The facility failed to ensure the wound care treatment cart was locked. These failures could place residents in the facility at risk of receiving expired and ineffective medications, and misuse of medications. Findings include: A) Observation on 04/08/2025 at 3:00 PM in the medication storage room behind the nurse's station revealed two bottles of Fish Oil 1000 mg supplements, expiration dates of 03/2025, and one 8 fluid ounce bottle of liquid Acetaminophen 500 mg/15 ml. Observation on 04/09/2025 at 8:31 AM in the A Hall medication aide cart of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserve nutritive value for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure Dietary [NAME] M did not add an unmeasured amount of milk to the bread puree. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hungry, unwanted weight loss, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Observation and interview on 04/09/2025 at 11:05 AM revealed Dietary [NAME] M placed milk into the puree blender. She did not measure the milk. Dietary [NAME] M began to add bread to the puree blender on top of the milk. She stated there were three residents on puree diets and she added four pieces of bread to the pureed blender. Dietary [NAME] M stated the Dietary Consultant trained her that all puree was to be the consistency of something to drink. The puree bread was of liquid consistency. Interview on 04/09/2025 at 11:10 AM, the Dietary Manager stated the Dietary Consultant did re-train all the cooks, however, she did not hear him say to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide L wore a hair net when standing over the clean dishes and when she placed the clean dishes on the food prep area in the kitchen. 2. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide K used proper hand hygiene during preparation of the lunch meal. These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: 1. Observation on 04/08/2025 at 9:15 AM revealed Dietary Aide L was not wearing a hair net when placing clean dishes from the dishwasher room in the kitchen area. Interview on 04/08/2025 at 9:20 AM, Dietary Aide L stated she was not wearing a hair net when she was standing over clean dishes and when she moved the clean dishes from the dishwashing area to the kitchen on the food prep table. She stated it was a possibility hair may fall in the food while she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure personal privacy for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #52) reviewed for privacy while receiving wound care. The facility failed to ensure the privacy of Resident #52 by not closing the door all the way or pulling a privacy curtain during wound care. This failure could place residents at risk of loss of privacy and dignity. Findings include: Record review of the undated Face Sheet for Resident #52 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (lungs cannot properly exchange gases causing abnormal levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the blood, causing difficulty breathing and can be fatal), Obesity Body Mass Index 70 or greater, adult, (morbid obesity which can lead to a range of health problems including heart disease, high blood pressure, breathing, difficulties), and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of the Optional State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 1 (Resident #5) of 19 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's comprehensive care plan reflected a plan of care for her left-hand contracture (A permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen and a decrease in ROM) with interventions for the care and treatment of her left-hand contracture. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate care and treatment. Findings included: Review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 04/09/2025 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, cerebral infarction (the pathologic process that results in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain. It is caused by disrupted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one of six residents (Resident #27) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to provide wound care for Resident #27 using professional wound care standards and failed to follow the facility Validation Checklist Wound Care procedure. This failure could place residents at risk of improper wound management, deterioration in existing wounds, leading to infection and pain. Findings include: A) Record review of Resident #27's undated Face Sheet reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. He had diagnoses of non-pressure chronic ulcer of left heel and midfoot with necrosis (death of body tissue) of muscle, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complication (long term condition in which the body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1of 3 residents reviewed with limited range of motion (Resident #5), received appropriate treatment and services to prevent a decline in range of motion. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 had interventions in place for her left- hand contracture (A permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen and a decrease in ROM) to prevent further decline of the range of motion in her right hand. This failure placed residents with contractures at risk for decrease in mobility, range of motion, and contribute to worsening of contractures. Findings Include: Review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 04/09/2025 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, cerebral infarction (the pathologic process that results in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain. It is caused by disrupted blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who are incontinent of bladder receive appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one of four residents reviewed for catheters (Resident #9). The facility failed to ensure Resident #9 received care to prevent urinary tract infections when they placed her catheter tubing under her leg and failed to have a secure catheter device in place to prevent dislodgement of the catheter. These failures could place residents with external catheters at risk for urinary tract infections and traumatic removal of the urinary catheter. Findings included: Review of Resident #9's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses acute and chronic respiratory failure, morbid obesity, COPD (chronic lung disease) and CHF (heart failure). Review of Resident #9's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected she was assessed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident #69) of six residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure MA F waited for Resident #69 to consume her morning medications on 04/08/2025 before leaving the resident's room and to administer medication. The facility further failed to ensure Resident #69 receive antibiotic medication for UTI on 04/08/2025 in PM. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident # 69's face sheet, dated 04/10/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses urinary tract infection ( an infection in your urinary system), type 2 diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis without coma ( a serious complication of diabetes where the body does not produce enough insulin, leading to a buildup of harmful acids in the blood), essential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for 1 of 15 residents, (Resident # 27) observed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure LVN B used proper infection control procedures while proving wound care. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings include: Record review of Resident #27's undated Face Sheet reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. He had diagnoses of non-pressure chronic ulcer of left heel and midfoot with necrosis (death of body tissue) of muscle, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complication (long term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy). Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's medical records included documentation that indicated the resident, or their responsible party, received education of the benefits, and potential side effects, of the influenza or pneumococcal immunization, receipt of the influenza or pneumococcal immunization, or residents did not receive the influenza or pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindication, or refusal, for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident #5 and Resident #67) The facility failed to document, in Resident #5's and Resident #67's medical records, having had received education, whether by self or with responsible party, of the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza immunization and receipt of the of the pneumococcal immunization or having had not received the pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal. This failure could place residents at risk of contracting a viral illness, influenza and pneumococcal,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to implement their policy to ensure the residents, or their responsible party, received education of the benefits and risks, or potential side effects of Covid-19 immunizations, receipt of Covid-19 immunizations, or the residents did not receive the Covid-19 immunizations, due to medical contraindication, or refusal, for 2 of 5 residents who were reviewed for immunizations. (Resident #5 and Resident #67) The facility failed to document, in Resident #5's and Resident #67's medical records, having had received education, whether by self or with their responsible party, of the benefits and risk, and potential side effects, of the Covid-19 immunization, receipt of the of the Covid-19 immunization, or having had not received the Covid-19 immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal. This failure could place residents at risk of not being informed of complications and potential adverse health outcomes. Findings include: A) Review of Resident #5's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 9 residents (Residents #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8 and Resident #9) of 12 residents reviewed for medication administration were free of significant medication errors. Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8 and Resident #9 did not receive their evening medications scheduled in the evening (to be administered between 4:00pm and 6pm) on 05/01/24 and 05/07/24 as ordered by the physician, placing them at risk. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of the face sheet of Resident #1 dated 05/10/24 revealed Resident #1 was [AGE] years old and was initially admitted on [DATE] and re admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Hypertension, Unsteadiness on feet, Lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation. interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal care for 4 of 5 residents (Residents #1, # 2, # 3 and #4) reviewed for ADL care in that: A) Resident #1 was not provided with nail care. B) Resident #2 was not provided with nail care. C) Resident #3 was not provided with nail care. D) Resident #4 was not provided with brief changes and peri care. These failures could place residents at risk of skin breakdown, pain, infection, and loss of self-esteem. Findings included: A. Record review of the undated Face Sheet for Resident #1 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of the undated Medical Diagnosis sheet for Resident #1 reflected he had a diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy (a congenital, present from birth, disorder of movement, muscle tone or posture due to abnormal brain development) dated 07/01/2019 and muscle weakness generalized dated 11/03/2020. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #56 and Resident #3) of 5 residents reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A performed hand hygiene during wound care for Resident #56. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA B and RA C performed hand hygiene during incontinence care for Resident #3. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #56's Face Sheet dated 02/29/24, reflected he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Lupus. Review of Resident #56's Progress Notes written by LVN D reflected: 02/26/24 at 5:33 AM Note Text: CNA reported that resident had a wound on his right lower leg and the wound was bleeding. Assessment performed of the wound. Two abrasions, red in sight, and warm to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 (Resident #30) of 5 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to honor Resident #30's choice to not take Mirtazapine (anti-depressant). This failure placed residents at risk for loss of dignity and self-worth. Findings included: Record review of Resident #30's annual MDS assessment, dated 12/24/23, reflected he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His cognitive status was intact. His diagnoses included depression and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Record review of Resident #30's Order Summary Report for February 2024 reflected: 12/15/23 Mirtazapine Tablet 7.5 mg , give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day. Review of Resident #30's Informed Consent for use of Psychotropic Medication revealed the consent for mirtazapine was signed by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 6 resident (Resident #26 ) reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to supervise Resident #26 while smoking. This failure could place residents who required supervision while smoking at risk for burns. The findings included: Review of Resident #26's annual MDS assessment, dated 11/29/23, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her cognitive status was moderately impaired. Her diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia. Review of Resident #26's Care Plan, dated 04/15/22, reflected she smoked. Her facility interventions included: Smoking assessment by the SW and smoking in designated areas only. Review of Resident #26's, Safe Smoking Assessment, documented by the DON, dated 02/01/24, reflected the resident required direct supervision while smoking. An observation and interview on 02/28/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 (Resident #33) reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure the pureed meal which consisted of steak patty with brown gravy, broccoli and cauliflower blend, au gratin potatoes, and roll were prepared in a way to preserve vitamins and taste by not following required measuring when adding thickener and water to the food items. This failure could place residents at risk of nutrition and hydration and negatively impact the recovery from, illness or injury. Findings included : During the test tray tasting, with the Dietary Manager present, on 02/28/24 at 12:39 AM, the food was mildly warm. The regular plate was palatable. No complaints or concerns were noted with the regular plate; however, the puree plate was not visually pleasing, and the taste of the food was void of flavor. The plate consisted of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food storage, labeling, dating, and kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure food in the facility's dry goods storage, was labeled and dated according to guidelines. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illnesses. Findings included: Observations on 02/27/24 from 09:10 AM to 09:21 AM in the facility's only kitchen reflected: Three opened cans of Baking Powder, dated 9/29 and there was no visible expiration date. Three 1-gallon container of Worcestershire sauce, dated 5/22 and there was no visible expiration date. One of the containers had been opened and had congealed sauce, which adhered to the inside of the container and dried sauce drip stain on the outside of the container. A plastic container labeled Baking Soda, dated 12/30 and there was no visible expiration date. The label on the lid had an aged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for personal hygiene, in that: The facility failed provide showers to Resident #1 in compliance with her shower schedule. This deficient practice could place residents who are dependent on staff for ADL care at risk of poor hygiene, grooming, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/14/23, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged to the hospital ER on [DATE], her own RP, and with diagnoses including encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, muscle wasting and atrophy not elsewhere classified and multiple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all allegations involving abuse and neglect were immediately reported no later than 24 hours after an allegation was made for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for grievances, in that: The facility failed to report Resident #1's allegation of verbal abuse to the State Agency within 24 hours. Resident #1's family filed a grievance on 10/18/23 that stated Resident #1 told them that staff were not changing her wound dressing, her wound was worsening, and she would not ask staff for assistance because staff yelled at her when she asked. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of abuse or neglect. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/14/23, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged to the hospital ER on [DATE], her own RP, and with diagnoses including encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, type 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident within 48 hours of the resident's admission that included instructions for providing effective and person-centered care for the resident and met professional standards of quality care for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans, in that: The facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for Resident #1. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their immediate care needs met or not receiving continuity of care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/14/23, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged to the hospital ER on [DATE], her own RP, and with diagnoses including encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, muscle wasting and atrophy not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans, in that: The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #1. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their individual care needs met or diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/14/23, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged to the hospital ER on [DATE], her own RP, and with diagnoses including encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accidents and hazards for one (1) of one facility resident transport van reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure the facility resident transport van used for dialysis appointments was maintained properly for safety hazards that may result in an injury to a resident. The transport van overheated en route back to the facility, the starter needed to be replaced, and then the engine needed to be replaced. The resident transport van was used 3-4 times a week on average for appointments, activity outings, etc. This failure could place residents at risk of injuries, illness, and hospitalization. Findings included: On 10/25/2023 at 1:30 pm, LVN A stated the van broke down numerous times over the last two months. LVN A said the facility used a rental van to transport residents. LVN A stated this inconvenienced the residents resulting in missed appointments. On 10/25/2023 at 1:50 pm,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had comfortable and safe temperature levels for one of four halls (D hall) and the dining area. The facility failed to ensure the facility was maintained at a comfortable and safe temperature level and maintained a temperature range of 71 to 81°F, when the HVAC units for the dining area and D hall were not functioning and the temperatures in these areas were between 79 -85 degrees. This failure placed residents at risk for heat related illnesses and an uncomfortable environment leading to a decreased quality of life. Findings Included: On 8/22/23 at 10:50 am, the MTD director stated there had been a problem for about 2 weeks with the air-conditioning in the dining room. He stated they had the unit repaired back in July of 2023, but it stopped working about 2 weeks ago. He stated he had the repair techs out here last week on 8/18/23 and they diagnosed the problem and stated they would have to order parts. He stated the temperature in the dining room has exceeded 81 degrees at times. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains free of accidents and hazards for one (1) of one facility resident transport van reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure the facility resident transport van was inspected yearly for safety hazards that may result in an injury to a resident. The resident transport van was used 3-4 times a week on average for appointments, activity outings, etc. This failure could place residents at risk of injuries, illness, and hospitalization. Findings included: On [DATE] at 12:20 pm, a resident that did not want to be identified, informed the surveyor that the tags and inspection were out on the facility van. The resident stated they had expired the end of July. On [DATE] at 1:14pm, the Business Office Manager stated she had received a notice from Texas DMV in mid-[DATE] that they were unable to renew the registration on the van because they required proof of insurance. The check that had been sent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to be administered in a manner that maintained the wellbeing of each resident when the administration did not take immediate action when the motor vehicle insurance lapsed for one (van #1) out of one resident transport van The facility administration failed to ensure that the vehicle insurance for the resident transport van was paid and insurance in place prior to using the van for resident transports. The resident transport van was used 3-4 times a week on average for dialysis appointments, doctor appointments, activity outings, etc. This failure placed residents at risk of not having necessary resources and services available to them during day-to-day operations and emergencies which could result in lack of care. Findings included: In an interview with the Business Office Manager on [DATE] at 1:14 pm she stated the facility tag renewal check had been returned in Mid-June due to missing proof of insurance. She stated the insurance card they had on file…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0836 — patternEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operate and provide services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, for 1 of 1 facility resident transport van reviewed for insurance coverage. The facility failed to ensure the resident transport van was fully insured per state laws while being operated to transport residents to and from appointments and outings. The resident transport van was used 3-4 times a week on average for appointments, activity outings, etc. This failure could place residents at risk for injuries and hospitalizations from vehicle accidents that would not be covered under vehicle insurance. Findings Included: In an interview with the Business Office Manager on [DATE] at 1:14 pm she stated the facility tag renewal check had been returned in Mid-June due to missing proof of insurance. She stated the insurance card they had on file had expired [DATE]. She stated she informed the Regional [NAME] President (RVP) and the AR rep in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to properly thaw a pan of approximately 15 pork chops. 2. The facility failed to properly label food in one of two facilities refrigerators located in the kitchen. 3. The facility failed to ensure temperatures were monitored and logged in the white open front combined refrigerator and freezer and the open top white deep freezer in the kitchen. 4. The facility failed to ensure Dietary [NAME] B and Dietary Aide C properly sanitized their hands between tasks. These failures could place the residents at risk for health complications and foodborne illnesses. Findings included: 1. Observation of the kitchen on 12/27/2022 at 8:15 AM - 9:00 AM revealed approximately 15 partially frozen pork chops in a deep silver pan located in the sink with approximately 1-2 inches of water in the silver pan. The pork chops were being thawed for the lunch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of each resident's needs for 9 of 11 Residents (#57, #32, #9, #48, #30, #3, #34, #14 and #23) reviewed for meals. The facility failed to ensure Resident #57, #32, #9, #48, #30, #3, #34, #14 and #23 had appropriate utensils on their meal trays. This failure placed residents at risk for not having their needs and preferences met and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Observation on 12/28/2022 between 11:50 PM- 12:30 PM Residents in the dining room and in their rooms did not have knives on their meal tray. Record review of Resident # 57's face sheet, dated 12/30/2022, revealed resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to facility on 11/14/2022 had diagnosis muscle weakness generalized (lack of muscle strength), moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (deficiency of energy, protein and micronutrients), resident had surgery on her teeth after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-02 · tag F0742 — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was diagnosed with a mental illness or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who had a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder, received appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for two (Resident #57 and Resident # 44) of three resident reviewed for behavioral services. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #57 continued to receive psychiatric services after admission to the facility after she reported to have depression and was assessed to have depression. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #44 who was diagnosed with schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and delusional disorders received the care and services needed, after recommendation from psychiatric services for treatment one time per month for 12 months. These failures could place residents at risk for their mental and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-02 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences; appealing options of similar nutritive value to residents who choose not to eat food that is initially served or who request a different meal choice for eight (Resident #, 57, Resident #32, Resident #9, Resident #48, Resident #30, Resident #3, Resident #14, and Resident #34) of nine residents reviewed for resident food preferences. The facility failed to ensure Residents #57, #32, #9, #48, #3, #30, #14 and #34 received their preferred meal choice. This failure placed residents at risk for not having their nutritional needs met and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident # 57's face sheet dated 12/30/2022 revealed resident was a 57 -year-old female admitted to facility on 11/14/2022 had diagnosis muscle weakness generalized (lack of muscle strength), moderate protein-calorie…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections and follow accepted national standards for 4 of 12 residents (Resident #20, #3, #10, and #26) reviewed for infection control measures. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN C followed standard precautions during wound care for Resident #20's stage 3 pressure ulcer to her sacrum. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN C followed standard precautions during wound care for Resident #3's stage 3 pressure ulcer to her sacrum. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN C followed standard precautions during wound care for Resident #10's two stage 3 pressure ulcers to buttocks. 4. The facility failed to ensure ADON followed standard infection control measures when assisting Resident #23 with meal assistance. These failures could place…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-02 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to coordinate assessment with the pre admission screening and resident review ( PASARR) program under medicaid including referring a new admit resident with mental disorder for level II for one (Resident #57) of two residents reviewed for PASARR's. The facility failed to ensure Resident #57 continued to receive psychiatric services after admission to the facility after she reported to have depression and was assessed to have depression. These failures could place residents at risk for their mental and psychosocial needs not being met and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident # 57's face sheet dated 12/30/2022 revealed resident was a 57 -year-old female admitted to facility on 11/14/2022 and had diagnoses of bipolar disorder ( a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in mood, energy, activity levels, concentration, and the ability to carry out day to day tasks), adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 of 12 residents (Residents #46 and #17) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Residents #46 and #17's fingernails and toenails were trimmed and cleaned. This failure could place residents at risk of scratches, infections, and poor self-esteem. Findings included: Review of Resident #46's undated face sheet reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury (brain injury resulting from rapid head rotations of the brain) with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, limitation of activities due to disability, Cognitive Communication Deficit (difficulty with thinking and how one uses language), Hyperlipidemia (high levels of fats in the blood), Intermittent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of twelve residents (Resident #6) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure LVN C followed verbal orders from the RN Nurse Practitioner to administer an enema. This failure could place residents at risk of a decline in overall health. Findings included: Review of Resident #6's undated face sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified Cerebral Infarction (brain stroke), Asthma (condition in which airways become inflamed, narrow and swell, produce extra mucus which makes it difficult to breathe), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (adult onset), muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning of muscle mass), Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (common functional bowel disorder with difficult, infrequent or incomplete defecation), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Muscle weakness, and unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one resident (Resident #6) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's nebulizer mask and tubing were covered and dated. This failure could place all residents who use respiratory equipment at risk for respiratory infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #6's undated face sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified Cerebral Infarction (brain stroke), Asthma (condition in which airways become inflamed, narrow and swell, produce extra mucus which makes it difficult to breathe), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (adult onset), muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning of muscle mass), Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (common functional bowel disorder with difficult, infrequent or incomplete defecation), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication regiment review was completed by the Medical Director for one (Resident # 57) of two residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure the Medical Director followed up with his comment of continuing current order without a rationale for his response to the recommendation of the medication sedative/ hypnotic- duration- Sonata (Zaleplon). This failure could potentially place residents at risk of not having residents highest practicable level of physical, mental, psychosocial well-being and prevents or minimizes adverse consequences related to medication therapy. Findings include: Record review of Resident # 57's face sheet dated 12/30/2022 revealed resident was a 57 -year-old female admitted to facility on 11/14/2022 and had diagnoses of bipolar disorder ( a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in mood, energy, activity levels, concentration, and the ability to carry out day to day tasks), adjustment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who used psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions for one of three residents (Resident #3) reviewed for psychotropic medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3, who had a diagnosis of Ppsychotic Ddisorder with hallucinations, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder received GDRs for Buspirone, Clonazepam and Abilify. Thisese failures could affect all residents on psychoactive medications, by placing them at risk for possible adverse side effects, adverse consequences, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's undated face sheet reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a group of lung disease that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe, Psychotic Disorder with Hallucinations (mental disorder characterized by disconnection from reality, hearing or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,827 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,827 — penalty dated 2024-10-03
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GULF COAST LTC PARTNERS — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 2.6 | +2.4 vs chain |
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| THOMPSON, JOHNNY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/14/2023 |
| 600 BACON ST OPCO, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/01/2025 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/01/2025 |
| JIAN, PETER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/14/2023 |
| PARKER, KAREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/22/2024 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/01/2025 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/09/2026 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/09/2026 |
| GOLDBERGER, FAIGY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/09/2026 |
| 1424 FALLBROOK DR PROPERTY OWNER LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676475. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.