No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Castro County Nursing & Rehabilitation

1621 Butler Blvd., Dimmitt, TX 79027 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 114 certified beds · (806) 647-3117 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0607) — most recent Apr 20264 immediate-jeopardy citations$47,932 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Apr 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $47,932 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-25)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
909 E Park Ave · (806) 391-8162 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
103 W Belsher St · (806) 647-2488 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1201 Western Cir · (806) 647-3115

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.2%15.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.6%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.2%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.1%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.6%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.2%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table31.4%9.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.0%88.0%79.4%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.382.171.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.402.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.25
RN hours/ resident / day
0.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.71
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.93
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
52.2%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 50.9 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 63 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.93 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.02 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-25)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Ldisputed · IDR2025-05-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespread
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY I. Investigation Visit: Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from physical or sexual abuse for 19 (Resident #53, #56, #58, #47, #46, #49, #44, #4, #73, #32, #15, #72, #70, #71, #50, #1, #3, #41, and #14) of 19 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. 1. The facility failed to protect Resident #41 from abuse when Resident #58 groped her on 03/27/2025. 2. The facility failed to protect an unidentified resident from abuse by Resident #58 when Resident #58 slapped the unidentified resident on 03/29/2025. 3. The facility failed to protect Resident #44 from physical abuse when Resident #44 was pushed to the floor by Resident #46 on 10/27/2024. Resident #44 fractured a hip as a result of the fall. 4. The facility failed to protect Resident #71 from physical abuse when Resident #53 smashed Resident #71's fingers with a metal cup on 01/23/2025. 5. The facility failed to protect Resident #3 from physical abuse when Resident #53 took his shoe and slapped this Resident #3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-05-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY I. Investigation Visit Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policies and procedures that prohibited abuse for 19 (Resident #53, #56, #58, #47, #46, #49, #44, #4, #73, #32, #15, #72, #70, #71, #50, #1, #3, #41 and #14) of 19 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. 1. The facility failed to protect Resident #41 from abuse when Resident #58 groped her on 03/27/2025. 2. The facility failed to protect an unidentified resident from abuse by Resident #58 when Resident #58 slapped the unidentified resident on 03/29/2025. 3. The facility failed to protect Resident #44 from physical abuse when Resident #44 was pushed to the floor by Resident #46 on 10/27/2024. Resident #44 fractured a hip as a result of the fall. 4. The facility failed to protect Resident #71 from physical abuse when Resident #53 smashed Resident #71's fingers with a metal cup on 01/23/2025. 5. The facility failed to protect Resident #3 from physical abuse when Resident #53 took his shoe and slapped this Resident #3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-05-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 4 of 9 residents (Resident #7, #10, #15 and #41) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility staff failed to store hand sanitizer properly on 04/20/25 at 7:00 AM resulting in Resident #7 observing Resident #10 drinking an unknown amount of hand sanitizer which ended in him going to the hospital. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident #10 on an unknown date (after 4/20/25) in the dining room where he was able to drink the saliva of another resident (Resident #15) out of her (Resident #15) spit cup. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident #41 on 05/10/25 in the dining room where she was able to drink saliva of another resident (Resident #15) out of her (Resident #15) spit cup. An IJ was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-05-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for 11 (Resident #53, #56, #58, #47,#46, #4, #73, #32, #15, #72 and #70) of 14 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. - The facility failed to develop and implement Resident #53's care plans to reflect the resident's aggressive behaviors. - The facility failed to develop and implement Resident #56's care plans to reflect the resident's aggressive behaviors. - The facility failed to develop and implement Resident #58's care plans to reflect the resident's aggressive behaviors. - The facility failed to develop and implement Resident #47's care plans to reflect the resident's aggressive behaviors. - The facility failed to develop and implement Resident #46's care plans to reflect the resident's aggressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its written policies and procedures for screening to ensure potential employees were screened before hire for 2 of 5 employees (RN A, [NAME] B) reviewed for employability status. The facility failed to ensure the Employee Misconduct Registry /Nurse Aide Registry check was conducted for RN A and [NAME] B before hire. B. The facility failed to ensure the Criminal History check was conducted for RN A before hire. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, neglect and/or exploitation. Findings included: Record review of RN A's personnel file reflected a hire date of 11/22/25. There was no evidence of the EMR/NAR check being completed before hire. An EMR/NAR history check was completed on 1/20/26. There was no evidence of the Criminal History check completed before hire. A Criminal History check was completed on 2/11/26. Record review of [NAME] B's personnel file reflected a hire date of 2/6/26. There was no evidence of the EMR/NAR check being completed before hire. The EMR/NAR check had been completed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify and provide a copy of the 30-day discharge notice to the representative of the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge planning. The facility failed to ensure notification of a 30-day discharge for Resident #1 was provided to the Ombudsman. This failure could result in residents not having adequate assistance and services in placement issues. Findings Included:Record review of Resident #1 's facility record revealed she was a 59-yo female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia, schizophrenia unspecified, delusional disorders, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance, post-traumatic stress disorder, mild cognitive impairment and diabetes.A Care Plan dated 1/14/26 documents resident was at risk for falls, had behaviors, was verbally and physically aggressive, had impaired cognition and made false statements. Resident #1 needed some assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and distributed in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety. The facility failed to ensure foods served to residents were not laying on the kitchen countertops, open to air. The facility failed to ensure refrigerated foods served to residents were covered, labeled, and dated. The facility failed to ensure dry pantry foods served to residents were properly sealed, labeled and dated. The facility failed to ensure frozen foods served to residents were properly sealed, labeled and dated. These failures could cause residents who consumed these foods to become sick due to food-borne illness, and/or a loss a of the food's nutritional value. Findings included: An observation of the kitchen countertops on 05/12/2025 at 9:35AM revealed the following: (1) partial 35oz. bag of frosted flake cereal, open to air, (1) partial 1lb. bag of corn chips, open to air, (4) thawed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 3 of 15 residents (Resident #17, Resident #19, and Resident #51) reviewed for call light placement. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #17, Resident #19 and Resident #51 had access to their call lights. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the necessary assistance they need to maintain their highest level of independence. Findings included: Review of Resident #19's clinical records dated 03/13/2025 revealed Resident #19 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia in other Diseases Classified Elsewhere, Unspecified Severity, without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety(dementia that is a result of a known physical condition), Chronic Viral Hepatitis C (long-term liver infection caused by the Hepatitis C Virus), Wernicke's Encephalopathy (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facilities reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to ensure the presence of a register nurse to oversee the care for high acuity residents and the care provided by other staff such as Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) and Certified Nurse's Aides (CNAs) for 30 of 31 days in January 2025, 19 of 28 days in February 2025, 20 of 31 days in March 2025, and 20 of 30 days in April 2025. This failure could place residents with unpredictable health concerns or requiring a higher level of care at risk of serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. Findings included: Review of RN coverage hours for the month of January 2025 revealed there was no RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours on the following dates: January 1-17, and January 19-31. Review of RN coverage hours for the month of February 2025 revealed there was no RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours on the following dates: February 3-13, February 16-18, February 21-23, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advanced directive for 1 (Resident #7) of 15 residents reviewed for advanced directives. Resident #7 had a DNR in his record that was missing the date when Resident #7 initiated the form. The facility's failure could place residents a risk for not receiving healthcare as per their or their legal representatives wishes. Findings included: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet printed [DATE] revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male resident admitted to the facility originally on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include malignant neoplasm (a fast-growing cancer that spreads to other areas of the body) of unspecified part of the bronchus (any of the major air passages of the lungs which diverge from the windpipe) or lung and malignant neoplasm of the lobe (upper left bronchus or lung). Section for Advanced Directive revealed Resident #7 was listed as a DNR. Record review of Resident #7's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable environment for 3 (Room A2, A10, and F5) of 41 resident rooms reviewed for environment. -Room A2 had a large hole in the wall between the resident's bedside dressers. -Room A10 had two large holes and one small hole in the wall between the bathroom and closet doors. -Room F5 had a large area of peeling paint at the head of a resident's bed. These failures could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment. Findings include: During an observation on 05/12/25 at 10:31 AM noted in room A10 (occupied by two male residents from the memory care unit that were not interviewable) were two large holes in the wall between the closet and bathroom door on the wall opposite the resident beds. The first hole was approximately 5 inches by 2 ½ inches and the second hole was approximately 2 ½ by 2 ½ inches. Also noted in the upper area of the wall was a small hole for the TV cable. During an observation on 05/12/25 at 10:46 AM noted in room A2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care, was provided consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for 2 (Resident #9, #27) of 15 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #'9's and #27's oxygen setting was per physician orders. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for respiratory compromise and associated complications such as shortness of breath, confusion, respiratory failure, infection, and exacerbation of their condition. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet printed 4-8-2024 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female resident admitted to the facility originally on 10/16/2008 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebral infarction (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), weakness, lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-25 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 15 residents (Resident # 38) reviewed for trauma-informed care. The facility did not ensure Resident #38 had a trauma screening that identified possible triggers when Resident #38 had a history of trauma. This failure could put residents at an increased risk for severe psychological distress due to re-traumatization. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 05/13/2025, indicated Resident #38 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] had diagnoses that included but not limited to schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, post-traumatic stress disorder (a mental health condition that can develop in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for each resident that are complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systemically organized for 2 (Resident #31, 42) of 15 residents reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31's and Resident #42's physician orders and care plans reflected their current status of no longer being in the secured unit. This failure could place residents at risk of having records that do not reflect their current status or needs. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #31's Face Sheet dated 05/13/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia(impairment of memory), without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, major depressive disorder, Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia(neurological…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #27)) of 4 residents observed for infection control. -CNA C did not wash her hands while performing incontinent care for Resident #27. This deficient practice has the potential to affect residents in the facility receiving incontinent care by exposing them to care that could lead to the spread of infections, tissue breakdown, and feelings of isolation related to poor hygiene. Findings include: Record review of Resident #27's face sheet revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female resident admitted to the facility originally on 11/14/23 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), schizoaffective disorder (a mental health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-25 · tag F0924 — isolated
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure corridors were equipped with firmly secured handrails on each side for 1 (A Hall) of 6 halls reviewed for handrails. The handrail between room A8 and A10 was loose. This deficient practice has the potential to place residents at risk for injuries related to falls that could result in bruising, skin tears, wounds, fractures, and decreased quality of life. Findings include: During an observation on 05/12/25 at 10:39 AM an approximate 10-foot section of handrail between room A8 and A10 was noted to have the middle section loose and this surveyor was able to move the handrail back and forth approximately ½ inch. The handrail was secured on each end and in the middle by brackets with two screws. Both screws in the middle bracket were loose. During an interview on 05/14/25 at 08:18 AM the MS noted that the handrail between room A8 and A10 was loose and that the screws had loosened. The MS reported that he makes rounds everyday as part of what the facility calls Angel Rounds and that he had missed the loose rail on his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — widespread
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an alleged violation of abuse or neglect immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involved abuse or result in serious bodily injury, to officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency for 19 (Resident #53, #56, #58, #47, #46, #49, #44, #4, #73, #32, #15, #72, #70, #71, #50, #1, #3, #41 and #14) of 19 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. 1. The facility failed to report Resident #58 groped a Resident #41 on 03/27/2025. 2. The facility failed to report Resident #58 slapped another resident on 03/29/2025. 3. The facility failed to report Resident #44 was pushed to the floor by Resident #46 and sustained a broken hip on 10/27/2024. 4. The facility failed to report Resident #53 had a physical altercation with Resident #71 on 01/23/2025. 5. The facility failed to report Resident #53 took his shoe and slapped Resident #3 with it on 03/12/2025. 6. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-25 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and follow a written policy on permitting residents to return to the facility after being hospitalized for 1 resident (Resident #73) of 19 residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. The facility did not allow Resident #73 to return to the facility after evaluation and treatment at a Psych Hospital. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of being discharged and not allowed to return to the facility causing a disruption in their care and services and potential decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #73's face sheet, dated 04/17/2025, revealed that Resident #73 was an [AGE] year-old male resident who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease with late onset (a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects the brain, causing a gradual decline in cognitive function, including memory and thinking skills), dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on assessed needs to address Resident #1's bipolar disorder, anxiety and depression and their interventions. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving desired and necessary care and treatment. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 03/18/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for one of five (Resident #1) residents reviewed for medication administration. -Resident #1 received a dose of 100units of insulin glargine instead of the prescribed 11units on the evening of 02/16/2025 in error. This failure could place residents who receive insulin medications at an increased risk for complications such as decreased blood glucose levels, change in cognition, and an exacerbation of symptoms and disease process. The noncompliance was found to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC). The noncompliance began on 02/16/2025 and ended on 02/17/2025. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's most recent face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female resident who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but not limited to, congestive heart failure, hypothyroidism, type 2 diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications and a decision to transfer or discharge the resident from the facility for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for notification. LVN D failed to notify Resident #1's family and physician when Resident #1 was found unresponsive in his room and sent to the hospital via ambulance. This failure could cause residents to feel alone and/or abandoned by their family members in times of crisis. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 01/25/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of resident and misappropriation of resident property for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to implement their policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation when CNA A failed to report bruising to Resident #1's ribcage she found on 01/24/25 during a brief change. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse/continued abuse. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 01/25/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance (breakdown of thought process causing disruptive behavior), psychotic disorder with delusions (severe mental illness including distorted beliefs), generalized anxiety disorder (inability to control constant worrying),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for accuracy of medical records. The facility failed to list the correct behavioral hospital on Resident #1s admission Record. The facility failed to perform a skin assessment on Resident #1 for three days (01/18/25, 01/19/25, and 01/20/25) following his admission skin assessment, as per their Skin Assessment policy. The facility's failure to ensure medical records on each resident were complete, accurately documented, and readily accessible, placed all residents requiring care at risk for incorrect or omitted treatment, duplicated treatments, and a failure to ensure continuity of care. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 01/25/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-12 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care and the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment requirement for 1 of 1 kitchen staff (Dietary Manager) reviewed for qualifications. The Dietary Manager failed to have the appropriate license, certification, or qualifications to function as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services. This failure could place residents who consume food prepared from the kitchen at increased risk of food borne illness and not receiving adequate nutrition. Findings included: Record Review of a current facility employee roster including hire date, indicated the DM's date of hire was 04/30/2024. During an interview on 12/12/24 at 7:14 AM, the DM stated she had been employed at the facility since April , 2024 but had been the DM since June , 2024. When asked for her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of the discharge notice to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 1 (Resident #1) of 5residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. The facility failed to provide a notice of discharge to the facility's Ombudsman as soon as practicable when Resident #1 was discharged on 12/11/24 to a locked unit at another facility due to the current facility not being able to meet Resident #1's needs. This failure could place residents at risk of being discharged and not having access to available advocacy services, discharge/transfer options, and appeal processes. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/12/2024 reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female, with admission date of 12/26/2023 and then discharged to another facility on 12/11/2024. The resident had diagnoses which included but not limited to: Alzheimer's disease (memory loss), anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, and wandering. Review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident has the right to exercise his or her rights as a resident of the facility and as a citizen or resident of the United States for 11 (Resident #2, Resident # 3, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, and Resident #13) of 54 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure 11 residents (Resident #2, Resident # 3, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, and Resident #13) were able to vote in the election of 2024. This failure could place residents at risk of feeling unheard and devalued. Findings Included: 1. Record review of Resident #2's admission record dated 11/06/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia (partial paralysis) affecting right dominant side, muscle weakness, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #4) of 6 residents and 3 (Room A2, Room A7, and Room A9) of 8 rooms on the locked unit reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a sink in his bathroom for approximately a week. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had a sink in her bathroom for an undetermined period of time. 3. The facility failed to ensure the sinks in the bathrooms of Room A2, Room A7, and Room A9 were securely attached to the wall. These failures could place residents at risk of injury, infection, and feeling ill at ease in their living environment. Findings Included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 11/06/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency Resident #1's black eye within 24 hours of discovery of the injury. This failure could place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review; it was determined the facility failed to ensure that in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented, and readily accessible for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for clinical records (Resident #1) in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's concerns about the prior administrator were documented and addressed in social services notes. The facility's failure to ensure medical records on each resident were complete, accurately documented, and readily accessible, placed all residents requiring care at risk for incorrect or omitted treatment, duplicated treatments, poor self-esteem and self-worth, and a failure to ensure continuity of care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 09/19/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's current diagnoses included but not limited to diffuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program (PASRR) to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for 1 of 7 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility contacted the HHSC PASRR Unit on 5-7-2024 for Resident #1 and no NFSS (Nursing Facility Specialized Services) form was provided to the HHSC PASRR Unit by the required date of 5-10-2024. This failure could affect residents with mental illnesses and placed them at risk of not being assessed to receive needed services. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's clinical record face sheet printed 7-17-2024 revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebral palsy (group of disorders that affect a person's ability to move and maintain balance and posture), major depression (mental illness causing sadness due to lack of chemicals in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure stored food was properly labeled and dated. This failure could put place Residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings Included: Observation of shelved/refrigerated foods on 4/7/2024 at am revealed the following: 1. Observation of freezer 1 on 4/7/24 at 9:16 am revealed 1 bag of meat with no label or date. 2. Observation of freezer 1 on 4/7/24 at 9:18 am revealed 1 bag of squash in a plastic bag with no label or date. 3. Observation of freezer 1 on 4/7/24 at 9:18 am revealed 1 bag of green beans with no label or date. 4. Observation of refrigerator 1 on 4/7/24 at 9:25 am revealed 1 block of butter in a plastic bag with no label or date. 5. Observation of refrigerator 1 on 4/7/24 at 9:25 am revealed 1 cup of cream with no label or date. 6. Observation of kitchen counter on 4/7/24 at 9:26 am revealed 1open bag of corn…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable environment for 4 of 10 anonymous residents reviewed for environment and a homelike environment for 9 (Resident #2, #4, #21, #22, #27, #34, #36, #41, and #96) of 19 residents reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure during dining times that residents had comfortable sound levels that encouraged interactions. The facility failed to provide any furnishings to promote a homelike environment for 9 residents residing in the locked unit. This failure could place residents at risk for increased stress and affecting residents overall wellbeing. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment. Findings included for comfortable sound levels: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet printed on 04/8/2024 revealed at [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include schizoaffective disorder (mental disorder),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 (the medication room) of 2 medication storage areas reviewed for medication storage. The medication room refrigerator had medications that had been stored out of recommended storage temperatures. The facility's failure to ensure medications were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles could result in a resident receiving the incorrect medication or a medication that would be ineffective for their treatment resulting in exacerbation of the resident's condition and disease processes. Findings included: Record review of the medication room (the facility had one medication storage room) refrigerator log for April 2024 revealed the following documented temperatures: (-per merriam-webster.com: freezing point of water is 32 degrees Fahrenheit.) 4-1-2024-no temperature was noted. 4-2-2024- no temperature was noted. 4-3-2024-32 degrees Fahrenheit 4-4-2024-33 degrees Fahrenheit 4-5-2024-30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advanced directive for 1 (Resident #21) of 13 residents reviewed for advanced directives. Resident #21 had a DNR in his record that was missing information in the Two Witness's Section. The facility's failure to ensure the accuracy of a residents advanced directive such as a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate), recognized under State law (whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the State), relating to the provision of health care could place residents a risk for not receiving healthcare as per their or their legal representatives wishes. Findings included: Record review of Resident #21's face sheet printed 4-8-2024 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breath), intermittent explosive disorder(repeated sudden outbursts of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive and accurate assessment of each resident using the resident assessment instrument (RAI) specified by CMS for 1 (Resident #40) of 13 residents whose records were reviewed for assessments. Resident #40 was not listed as using tobacco on his 11-14-2023 admission MDS. This failure to ensure comprehensive and accurate assessments could affect residents by placing them at risk for inaccurate and incomplete MDS assessment which could result in residents not receiving correct care and services. Finding included: Record review of Resident #40's face sheet dated 4-8-2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old male resident admitted to the facility originally on 11-2-2023 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include neuroleptic induced parkinsonism (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movements to include tremors), hypertension (a condition in which the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), stimulant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish based on the comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices for 1 of 12 residents (Resident # 23) reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility failed to assess Resident # 23's needs for a communication board to assist her to effectively communicate with staff. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving services/care and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet printed on 04/8/2024 revealed at [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Schizoaffective disorder (mental disorder), anxiety disorder, cognitive communication deficit (problems with communication), Dysarthria(difficulty in speech due to weakness of speech muscles), anarthria (inability to produce clear speech),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards and each resident received adequate supervision as is possible for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #33 and Resident #40) reviewed for accidents and hazards. 1. The facility failed to ensure that a space heater was not being utilized in Resident #33's room. 2. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #33 did not have a lighter in his room. 3. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #40 did not have a Vape pen in his room. This failure could affect residents at the facility by placing them at risk for fire related injuries or ingesting unknown liquids from the Vape Pen. The findings were: Record review of Resident #33's face sheet dated 04/07/2024 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, heart failure, intermittent explosive disorder, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 (02/11/2024) of the last 90 days reviewed. The facility did not have an RN working in the facility for 1 (02/11/2024) of the last 90 days reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents in the facility by leaving staff without supervisory coverage for coordination of events such as hospice care, emergency care and disasters such as with flooding, power outage, tornado, fire, etc. Findings included: Record review of the facility's last 90 days (11/26/2023-04/07/2024) of RN coverage provided by the Administrator revealed the facility had no RN working in the facility for the following date: 02/11/2024. During an interview on 04/08/2024 at 3:17PM the DON verified that the facility did not have an RN working in the facility for 1 out of the last 90 days. The DON stated that on 02/11/2024 there was bad weather and that was the cause of not having a RN on shift that day as the RN that was supposed to be on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents for 1 of 5 staff (LVN A) reviewed for abuse policies. The facility failed to implement their own written policy and procedure for screening by not completing a Criminal Background Check for LVN A until 1/11/2024, 8 days after her hire date on 1/3/2024. This failure could place residents in the facility at risk of Abuse, Neglect, or Exploitation. Findings included: Record Review of LVN A's employee file revealed she was hired on 1/3/24 with her last EMR/NAR completed 2/7/24 and Criminal History completed on 1/11/24. During an interview on 02/07/24 at 4:47 PM, the ADON reported that a possible negative outcome for not having an EMR/NAR and Criminal Background check at hire would depend on what is in the employees' background, but that it could cause the residents' harm. During an interview on 2/07/24 at 4:49 PM, the ADM stated that the reason so many things were not where they were supposed to be is because of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 dining rooms reviewed for dining room sanitation. The facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was practiced during the distribution and service of resident food trays. These failures could place residents at risk for transmission-based illness. Findings included: Observation of the luncheon dining service on 1/23/24 at 12:02PM revealed the following: LVN A, CNA C, the Maintenance Supervisor and Restorative Aide were delivering food trays to residents without performing hand hygiene before and after each tray. On 1/23/24 at 12:04PM, LVN A was observed with her right hand on the wall of the dining room, while waiting to pick up a resident tray for delivery. She then picked up the resident's food tray, delivered it to the resident and got back into the service line, without performing hand hygiene. The Restorative Aide was also observed delivering resident food trays in the dining room, without performing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-23 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for 5 of 5 (CNA D, CNA E, LVN Charge, LVN B and BOM (Business Office Manager) newly hired staff reviewed for nursing home training. The facility failed to ensure new employees were properly trained in the prevention of Resident Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, HIV Policy and Procedures, Fall Prevention, Restraints, Emergency Procedures and Dementia. This failure could place residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and diminished psycho-social well-being, due to lack of training in essential Resident Care and Facility Practice. Findings included: Record review of employee records for the last 5 employees hired, revealed no training was conducted in Resident Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, Blood-borne Pathogen Policy and Procedures, Fall Prevention, Restraints, Emergency Procedures and Dementia, prior to these employees interacting with residents. These employee records reflected the following: CNA D: Date of Hire: 1/17/24 Certificate number and Date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation for 1 of 11 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for bed rails. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had (1) one-half bed rail, on the right side of his bed with no documentation of physician orders, consent, or safety assessment prior to installation. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, hinder residents from getting out of bed, and/or cause a decline in resident's ability to engage in activities of daily living. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to, neuroleptic induced parkinsonism (irregular movements caused by use of antipsychotics), schizoaffective disorder (mental health disorder with symptoms of distorted reality), polyneuropathy (malfunction of many peripheral nerves throughout the body). Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to properly dispose of an insulin syringe and maintain a clean environment free of bloodborne pathogens. This failure could place residents at risk of communicable diseases, decline in health and mental status, and cause potential harm that may lead to injury. Findings include: An observation on 11/18/23 at 12:08 PM revealed a bandage on the floor by the emergency exit door on Unit A . An observation on 11/18/2023 at 12:50 PM revealed a dried red substance which appeared to be blood, a brown liquid that had dried, and trash located in Resident #3's room on the floor and in the bathroom. An observation on 11/18/2023 at 12:51 PM revealed a torn alcohol square wrapping, a used alcohol square, and a syringe with clear a cap…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for environment. The facility failed to properly clean resident's rooms, maintain safe structure of the ceiling, provide a clean dining area, and ensure working order of sinks in the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of psychosocial decline, an increased institutional character setting, and spread of infections which could result in a decline in health. Findings include: An observation on 11/18/23 at 11:56 AM revealed a closet which contained trash liners, red and yellow plastic bags that were unidentifiable with approximately 5 empty boxes thrown in on the floor. An observation on 11/18/23 at 12:02 PM revealed a bowing ceiling in Unit A. An item which appeared to be a filter replacement latch was hanging approximate 1 inch from the right side while the left side was intact to the ceiling. A vent was protruding from the ceiling at approximately 1 inch all the way…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for pests in that: Flies were observed in multiple areas of the facility. This failure could affect residents by placing them at an increased risk of exposure to pests and vector-borne diseases and infections. Findings included: An observation on 9/8/23 at 3:36 PM revealed a resident had 6 flies on a rolling table located in their room to which the resident swatted them away with her left hand. An observation on 9/8/23 at 3:45 PM revealed a fly attempting to land on a resident's face during an interview. An observation on 9/8/23 at 4:35 PM revealed 5 flies resting on a resident's face located in the lobby area of the facility. An observation on 9/8/23 at 4:50 PM revealed 9 flies on a substance located on the floor. An observation on 9/8/23 at 5:02 PM revealed 5 flies resting on a resident in the lobby. When waved off, 4 flies settled back on resident. An observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency an injury of unknown origin to Resident #1's brow resulting in a hospital visit and sutures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 7 of 13 residents. The facility failed to: 1. Offer engaging activities in the Memory Care, secure unit This failure could affect residents of the facility by not addressing their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for each to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial outcome. The findings include: Observation of secure Memory Care Unit on 2/21/2023 at 10:00am five residents were sitting idle in the dining area of the unit staring at the walls. CNA B was sitting on the couch with one resident, there was no conversation with the residents while observation was occurring. Observation of the Memory Care Unit on 2/21/2023 at 11:30am six residents were sitting in the dining room area, the television was on, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 5 resident halls (Hall F) observed for bathroom sink water temperature in that: 6 resident rooms (F1, F3, F5, F6, F7 and F9) temperatures were not held between the state regulated water temperature of 100-110 Fahrenheit (F) degrees. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, injury and burns. The findings included: Observation on 02/22/23 at 02:07 PM in Room F5 revealed the water temperature from the resident-use sink was 125 degrees F checked with surveyor's digital thermometer. Room F5 had no resident. Observation on 02/22/23 at 02:15 PM in Room F6 revealed the water temperature from the resident-use sink was 114 degrees F checked with surveyor's digital thermometer. Room F6 had no resident. Observation on 02/22/23 at 02:23 PM in Room F9 revealed the water temperature from the resident-use sink was 118 degrees F checked with surveyor's digital thermometer. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week in the facility for 7 (01/07, 01/08, 01/15, 01/21, 01/22, 02/18, and 02/19/2023) of 53 days reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to maintain RN coverage of eight hours a day (01/07, 01/08, 01/15, 01/21, 01/22, 02/18, and 02/19/2023). This failure could place residents at risk of not having their nursing and medical needs met and receiving improper care. Findings included: Record review of the facility's employee roster undated revealed there were two RN's employed at the facility. Record review of Payroll Detail Report undated revealed there was not an RN scheduled to work on (01/07, 01/08, 01/15, 01/21, 01/22, 02/18, and 02/19/2023). Interview with the BOM on 02/23/23 at 09:00 AM he stated the payroll detail report he printed was all the time punch for RN hours. Interview with the Admin on 02/23/23 at 09:10 AM he stated the DON and ADON are responsible for scheduling RN coverage. He stated they currently do…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$47,932 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $47,932 — penalty dated 2025-05-25
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-28 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GULF COAST LTC PARTNERS — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 52.6+1.4 vs chain
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HART-LINE ASSOCIATES LPOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2023
THOMPSON, JOHNNYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/01/2024
DIMMITTTX, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/23/2025
MISTRETTA, CASSANDRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2023
PFEIFER, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2023
RANKIN, RONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2023
WEST WHARTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2023
WOODS, DANAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$1.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-17.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 6%Other / private 12%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$208per resident / day
operating cost
$6,312per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$177per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676186. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next