No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Oaks at Longview

111 Ruthlynn Dr., Longview, TX 75601 · For profit - Corporation · 108 certified beds · (903) 757-2557 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (903) 757-2557 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609) — most recent Jul 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
103 Woodbine Pl · (903) 212-7788 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
470 E Loop 281 · (903) 234-0080 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1708 Judson Rd · (903) 753-4930 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Akin Park0.5 mi
500 Delwood Dr · (903) 297-9177 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
107 Ruthlynn Dr · (903) 553-9754

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.7%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.9%3.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.8%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.8%18.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.1%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.6%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.8%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.4%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine63.4%88.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.7%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.1%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.452.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.672.061.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
16.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.1%CMS range 31.2–53.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF16.2%CMS range 12.1–21.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified88.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization12.0%CMS range 7.7–16.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.401.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.21
RN hours/ resident / day
1.12
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.32
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.65
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
48.5%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 77.1 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.65 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.80 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-27)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received therapeutic diets that were prescribed by the attending physician for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for therapeutic diets. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received a diabetic diet (CCHO). This failure could place residents at risk for altered nutritional status and decreased quality of life.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet indicated a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugars), noninfective gastroenteritis and colitis (inflammation of the digestive tract), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (bleeding from the digestive tract). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/2/2025, indicated she usually understood others and was sometimes understood by others. Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 03, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote resident self-determination through support of resident choice for 4 of 19 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident #16, Resident #33, Resident #40, and Resident #64). The facility failed to ensure Resident #16, Resident #33, Resident #40, and Resident #64 were allowed to smoke two cigarettes during the facility smoking times. This failure could place dependent residents at risk for feelings of depression or lack self-determination and decreased quality of life.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 08/25/25, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included major depressive disorder (A mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic lung disease that causes inflammation and narrowing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly resolve grievances for 6 of 6 Anonymous residents reviewed for grievances during a confidential meeting. The facility failed to ensure 6 of 6 Anonymous residents' grievances related to wet napkins on room trays were promptly resolved. This deficient practice could place the residents at risk for decreased quality of life and feelings of neglect or hopelessness. The findings included: During a confidential interview on 8/26/25 at 2:00 P.M. 6 of 6 Anonymous residents indicated grievances were not addressed or resolved promptly. Anonymous residents indicated they had made complaints about the napkins being wet on the hall trays in several resident council meetings. Anonymous residents indicated the Activity Director was present during the resident council meetings and was aware of complaints about the wet napkins. Anonymous residents stated it was still happening during meal pass and made them feel like no cared how they felt. Record review of the resident council minutes for 6/2/25, 6/23/25, 6/30/25, 7/14/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment maintaining a comfortable noise level for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #39) reviewed for dining services. The facility failed to ensure the noise level in the dining room was kept at a comfortable level for Resident #39 on 08/25/25 during the lunch meal. This failure could place residents at risk for a decreased quality of life.The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 09/02/25, reflected Resident #39 was a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (memory loss), history of a stroke, and a history of traumatic brain injury. Record review of the annual MDS assessment, dated 07/19/25, reflected Resident #39 had unclear speech, was usually understood by others, and was usually able to understand others. Resident #39's BIMS score was 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS reflected Resident #39…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 2 of 19 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #12) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility did not ensure Resident #3's and Resident #12's MDS assessments accurately identified a medication as an anti-platelet instead of an anticoagulant. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 08/26/25, indicated she was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia (a group of conditions that cause a progressive decline in cognitive abilities), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (chronic disease where your body either doesn't produce enough insulin or doesn't use insulin properly, leading to high blood sugar levels). Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/04/25, indicated she did not have a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, and dispensing of routine drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) residents reviewed for gastrostomy tube. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received potassium chloride (supplement), acidophilus (probiotic), Bactrim DS (antibiotic), and valproic acid (anticonvulsant) within the scheduled time frame on 08/26/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received apixaban (anticoagulant), ferrous sulfate (iron supplement), furosemide (diuretic), and valproic acid (anticonvulsant) within the scheduled time from on 08/26/25. These failures could place residents at risk for medication errors and adverse effects from medication.The findings included: Record review of face sheet, dated 08/27/25, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 4 of 7 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's had a skin assessment performed weekly on 8/9/24 and 8/16/24 per facility policy. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4 had skin assessment performed weekly on 8/16/24 per facility policy. These failures could result in skin issues on residents being missed, skin issues deteriorating without being monitored, and decreased quality of life. Findings Included: 1. Record review of the face sheet dated 8/28/24 indicated Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, hypertension (elevated blood pressure), muscle weakness, and depression. Record review of the MDS dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives and to choose the option he or she prefers for 5 of 21 residents reviewed for the right to be informed. (Resident's #21, #31, #33, #35, and #69) 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #21 had a signed psychotropic consent form for Duloxetine (antidepressant medication) or Haloperidol (antipsychotic medication). 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31's psychoactive (substances that, when taken in or administered into one's system, affect mental processes) medication therapy consent was completed for Depakote (is used to treat seizure disorders, certain psychiatric conditions (manic phase of bipolar disorder), and to prevent migraine headaches). 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33's psychoactive medication therapy consent was completed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents, for 4 of 6 staff (CNA F, CNA H, CNA G, the DOR) reviewed for abuse policy. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA F, CNA G, and DOR had criminal history background checks in their personnel file. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA H had EMR in the personnel file. These failures could place residents at risk for unsafe environment and abuse. Findings included: Record review of a facility's Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program policy revised 10/24/22, indicated .to ensure the facility establishes, operationalizes, and maintains an Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program designed to screen and train employees, protect residents, and ensure a standardized methodology for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse .the administrator is responsible for coordinating and implementing the facility's abuse prevention policies, procedures, training programs, and systems .screening .the facility does…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 3 of 10 resident reviewed for assessments. (Resident #31, Resident #33, and Resident #54) The facility failed to ensure Resident #31's diagnoses of anxiety (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities) and depression (is a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) was coded on her MDS. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33's diagnoses of bipolar (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs) and depression was coded on her MDS. The facility failed to ensure Resident #54's diagnosis depression was coded on her MDS. These failures could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #31's face sheet dated 07/16/24, indicated Resident #31 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    ased on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a performance review of each Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) at least once every 12 months, for 5 of 5 (CNA J, CNA F, CNA H, CNA K, and CNA G) reviewed for annual competency evaluations. The facility failed to complete annual CNA competency evaluations for CNA J, CNA F, CNA H, CNA K and CNA G based on the personnel file review results. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of not receiving consistent, appropriate interventions necessary to meet the residents' needs. Findings included: Record review of the Personnel File Review completed on 07/16/24, indicated CNA J, CNA F, CNA H, CNA K, and CNA G did not have a competency evaluation on file. The Personnel File Review indicated CNA J's date of hire was 03/07/17, CNA F 04/27/10, CNA H 01/22/02, CNA K 06/17/02, and CNA G 08/06/13. During an interview on 07/17/24 at 5:07 p.m., the DON said the staffing coordinator was responsible for the CNA trainings and competency evaluations. She said CNAs evaluation were supposed to be done annually. She said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each residents' drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs (without adequate behavior monitoring) for 4 (Resident # 33, Resident #35, Resident #54, Resident #69) of 5 residents whose medications were reviewed in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33 had side effect monitoring (are defined as unintended responses to approved pharmaceuticals (is any kind of drug used for medicinal purposes) given in appropriate dosages) for her prescribed Seroquel ((is an antipsychotic medication that treats several kinds of mental health conditions including schizophrenia (is a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves) and bipolar disorder (is a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration)), Buspirone (antianxiety; is used to treat anxiety disorders or in the short-term treatment of symptoms of anxiety, and Venlafaxine (antidepressant; is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record included documentation that indicates the resident received education on the influenza and the pneumococcal immunizations of 19 of 74 residents (Residents #39, Resident #38, Resident #7, Resident #53, Resident #33, Resident #58, Resident #56, Resident #54, Resident #2, Resident #67, Resident #68, Resident #60, Resident# 107, Resident #51, Resident #72, Resident #108, Resident #44, Resident# 109, and Resident #110) reviewed for immunizations. The facility failed to offer and administer the influenza and pneumococcal vaccination to Residents #39, Resident #38, Resident #7, Resident #53, Resident #33, Resident #58, Resident #56, Resident #54, Resident #2, Resident #67, Resident #68, Resident #60. The facility failed to offer and administer the pneumococcal vaccination to Resident# 107, Resident #51, Resident #72, Resident #108, Resident #44, Resident# 109, and Resident #110. The facility failed to offer and administer the influenza vaccination to Resident #67, Resident #68, Resident #60.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    ased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain ensure the required in-service trainings were sufficient for the continuing competencies of nurse aides but must be no less than 12 hours per year for 5 of 5 staff, (CNA F, CNA G, CNA H, CNA J, and CNA K) records reviewed for staff training. The facility failed to provide CNA F, CNA G, CNA H, CNA J, and CNA K 12 hours of training per year. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by untrained staff. Findings included: Record review of the Personnel File Review completed on 07/16/24, indicated CNA J, CNA F, CNA H, CNA K, and CNA G did not have 12 hours of training per year on file. The Personnel File Review indicated CNA J's date of hire was 03/07/17, CNA F 04/27/10, CNA H 01/22/02, CNA K 06/17/02, and CNA G 08/06/13. During an interview on 07/17/24 at 4:59 p.m., the HR Payroll said she had been at the facility for 4 months. She said she was responsible for training records, background checks, EMR and OIG results. She said she was responsible to notify the DON about training that needed to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY ased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide respect, dignity, and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of quality of life for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident #178) The facility failed to treat Resident #178 with respect and dignity when staff told her to urinate in her brief. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and self-worth. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet dated 07/17/24 revealed Resident #178 was [AGE] years old female and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Unspecified dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), insomnia (persistent problems falling and staying asleep) and Parkinsonism (brain conditions that cause slowed movements, rigidity (stiffness) and tremors). Record review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #178 BIMS was not performed and required maximal assistance for toilet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, which included but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safety, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for a homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31's wheelchair was clean. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #31's face sheet dated 07/16/24, indicated Resident #31 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (is a progressive disease beginning with mild memory loss and possibly leading to loss of the ability to carry on a conversation and respond to the environment), muscle weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Record review of Resident #31's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #31 was sometimes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #35) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report Resident #35's injury of unknown origin to her face, within 24 hours to the state agency. This failure could place residents at risk for continued abuse and neglect due to inappropriate interventions and failure to report the allegations of abuse timely. Findings included: Record review of a facility's Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan that included the instructions for resident care needed to provide effective and person-centered care was completed and provided to the resident and/or their representative for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for new admissions. (Resident #69) The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan for Resident #69 within 48 hours of admission. The facility failed to provide Resident #69's RP, a copy of the summary of the baseline care plan. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #69's face sheet dated 07/16/24, indicated Resident #69 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including dementia with other behavioral disturbance. The face sheet indicated Resident #69 family member were her responsible party. Record review of Resident #69's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #69 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop, and implement a comprehensive care plan to meet the medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 2 of 18 residents (Resident #17 and Resident #68) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #17's positioning rail. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #68 was care planned as smoker. 3. The facility failed to perform quarterly smoking assessments for Resident #68. 4. The facility failed to perform Resident #68's quarterly elopement risk assessments. These failures could place residents in the facility at an increased risk of a decline in physical or functional well-being, of not receiving necessary care or services, and having personalized plans developed to address their needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #17's face sheet dated 7/17/24 revealed he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #17 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI) for 1 of 3 residents who were reviewed for quality of care. (Resident #279) 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #279 had orders for the size and amount of fluid in the bulb of her indwelling urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine). 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident# 279 had orders catheter care with an indwelling urinary catheter. The failures could place residents at risk for indwelling urinary catheter pain, urinary tract infections, and not receiving needed care. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #279's face sheet dated 7/17/24 indicated Resident #279 was a [AGE] year old female and admitted to the facility initially on 7/13/24 with diagnosis chronic kidney disease stage 3 unspecified (when the kidneys have mild to moderate damage and less able to filter waste and fluid out of your blood).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident #35) The facility failed to ensure Resident #35's nasal cannula (is a medical device to provide supplemental oxygen therapy to people who have lower oxygen levels) was stored in a bag when not in use. The facility failed to ensure Resident #35's nebulizer mask (provide vaporized medicine into the airway) was stored in a bag after use. These failures could place residents at risk of respiratory infections. 1. Record review of Resident #35's face sheet fated 07/16/24, indicated Resident #35 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and 04/17/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (is a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs) and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (is a condition in which your lungs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies, skills set and accreditations to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service department for 1 of 7 (Dietary Aide A) reviewed for qualified dietary staff. The facility failed to ensure the DA A met the requirements for food handling by obtaining a food handler's certificate. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their nutritional needs met and placing them at risk for food born illnesses. Findings: During an interview and record review on 07/16/24 at 10:11 AM, the DM provided an undated Employee Demographics list that revealed DA A was hired 11/3/23. She said DA A did not have his food handler's certificate. She said he should have had it within 2 weeks of hire, but he did not get it. She said she talked to HR about it and let HR know he had not gotten it after she had reminded him numerous times. She said it was her responsibility and the responsibility of HR to make sure DA A got his food handler's certificate within 2 weeks of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all patient care equipment was in safe operating condition for 1 of 4 resident (Resident#31) reviewed safe, functional equipment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31's wheelchair brake handle was not loose. This failure could place resident at risk for usage of unsafe equipment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #31's face sheet dated 07/16/24, indicated Resident #31 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (is a progressive disease beginning with mild memory loss and possibly leading to loss of the ability to carry on a conversation and respond to the environment), muscle weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Record review of Resident #31's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #31 was sometimes understood and sometimes had the ability to understand others. Resident #31 was unable to complete the BIMS assessment. Resident #31…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #13, #18, #215) reviewed for urinary catheters. 1.Resident #13 had an indwelling urinary catheter since admission on [DATE] without a physician's order with an acceptable diagnosis for use. 2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #215 had a physician's order for her indwelling urinary catheter with appropriate diagnosis for use. 3.The facility failed to ensure Resident #215's and Resident #18's foley catheters were properly secured to prevent pulling or trauma. These deficient practices could affect residents who had urinary catheters at risk of not receiving care needed. The findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #13's face sheet dated 06/14/23 indicated the resident was a [AGE] year old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis acute cystitis of the bladder (a urinary infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation and determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled for 1 of 1 storage area reviewed for expired and discontinued medications. The facility failed to keep a record of receipt of controlled medications awaiting disposition to allow accurate and periodic reconciliation. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of prescribed medications, resident's safety, and drug diversion. Findings included: During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 02:00 PM, the following medications were observed in the controlled medication storage area waiting to be disposed: *Lorazepam 2mg/ml suspension- 22 mls RX# C743209 *ABH gel 2mg/25mg/5mg/ml- 4 mls RX# C742813 *Tramadol 50mg- 14 tablets RX# 4039352 *Lorazepam 1mg- 16.5 tablets RX# 529545…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2.During an observation on 06/12/23 at 11:32 a.m., RN A left the medication cart #2 unlocked when entering a resident's room. Staff and other residents observed in hallway. RN A came back to the medication cart, left medication cart unlock again leaving access to unauthorized personal to enter the cart. During an interview on 06/12/23 at 11:44 a.m., RN A said she forgot to lock the medication cart before walking into the resident's room. RN A said she was aware she was supposed to lock the medication cart anytime she stepped away. RN A said failure to lock the medication cart could leave access for anyone to get into the cart and take medication. During an observation and interview on 06/13/23 at 8:53 a.m., RN B observed to walk down hallway leaving the treatment cart unlocked. Observed staff, residents and visitors walking the by the nurse's station unlocked treatment cart. RN B returned to the nurse's station and when questioned, said she did not lock the treatment cart because she did not have the key. She said she knew it could be a hazard to leave the treatment cart open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure refrigerated foods were properly labeled and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure expired foods were not in the refrigerator. 3. The facility failed to ensure food was thawed properly. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included: During an observation on 06/11/23 at 09:18 AM, two frozen pork loins and one roll of frozen ground beef were found in a sink full of water without running water. They were not labelled or dated. During an interview on 06/11/23 at 09:20 AM, [NAME] D said she was working in the kitchen on 06/11/23. She said she had just put the meat in the sink before surveyors arrived to the facility. She said she forgot to leave the water running over the thawing meat. She said there should have been running water over the thawing meat. She said residents could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, The facility failed to comply with the requirements specified in 42 CFR part 489, subpart I (Advance Directives) for 1 of 3 (Resident #41) residents reviewed for advance directive The facility failed to ensure Resident #41 ' s code status was communicated and correctly indicated in his physical chart. This failure could result in residents receiving unwanted treatment or not receiving desired treatment. Findings include: Record review of Resident #41's face sheet, dated [DATE], indicated a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart attack (when your heart muscle begins to die because it isn't getting enough blood flow), high blood pressure, dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), respiratory failure (when the respiratory system cannot adequately provide oxygen to the body), and anxiety (feelings of nervousness, panic and fear as well as sweating and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of medical records for 1 (Resident #13) of 6 residents reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. The facility failed to ensure RN A protected Resident#13's Medication Administration Record (MAR). This failure could place residents at risk for low self-esteem, loss of dignity and decreased quality of life due to medication administration record being accessible to others. Findings included: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet, dated 06/13/23, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes (excess sugar in the blood), stroke (occurs when something blocks blood supply to part of the brain or when a blood vessel in the brain bursts), glaucoma (eye diseases that can cause vision loss and blindness) and anxiety ( feelings of nervousness, panic and fear as well as sweating and a rapid heartbeat). Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained free of accident hazards by not adequately monitoring the proper storage of oxygen cylinders for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #16) reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16's oxygen cylinder was properly stored. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 06/13/23, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE]. She had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), muscle weakness (a lack of strength in muscles) , and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body). Record review of Resident #16's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated she was usually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.Record review of Resident #46's face sheet, dated 06/13/23, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Gastrostomy status (a surgical procedure used to insert a tube, often referred to as a G-tube, through the abdomen and into the stomach), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), and stroke( occurs when something blocks blood supply to part of the brain or when a blood vessel in the brain bursts). Record review of Resident #46's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 03/31/23, indicated Resident #46 was sometimes understood and sometimes understood others. Resident #46's BIMs score was 04s, which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #46 required total assistance with eating, toilet use, dressing, and bathing, limited assist with bed mobility, transfer, and personal hygiene. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review of Resident #41's face sheet, dated 06/14/23, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart attack (when your heart muscle begins to die because it isn't getting enough blood flow), high blood pressure, dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), respiratory failure (when the respiratory system cannot adequately provide oxygen to the body),and anxiety (feelings of nervousness, panic and fear as well as sweating and a rapid heartbeat). Record review of Resident #41's admission MDS assessment, dated 05/21/23, indicated Resident #41 was understood and understood others. Resident #41's BIMs score was 12, which indicated he was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #41 was independent with transfer, dressing, bathing, bed mobility, personal hygiene and required supervision with toilet use. The MDS indicate Resident #41 received 6 doses of antianxiety medication during the 7 days look…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure RN A performed hand hygiene while preforming glucometer checks (a small, portable device that lets you check your blood sugars) and administering insulin for Resident #13. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for infection due to improper care practices. Findings include: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet, dated 06/13/23, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes (excess sugar in the blood), stroke (occurs when something blocks blood supply to part of the brain or when a blood vessel in the brain bursts), glaucoma (eye…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GULF COAST LTC PARTNERS — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 52.6+1.4 vs chain
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
111 RUTHLYNN DRIVE TX, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 07/01/2024
GIBRALTAR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
MONTGOMERY SKY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/17/2025
PINYON REALTY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
RUFF, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2024
EVERGREEN MANOR, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2024
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2024
OWENS, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
HAGINS, ELIZABETHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/17/2025
KAPLAN, MORDECHAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/17/2025
ZIMMERMAN, CAROLINEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/17/2025
STERNSHEIN, JENNIFERIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
CALIBER ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/17/2025
CRESTVIEW TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/17/2025
MAPLE HEALTHCARE, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
RIMPAU HOLDINGS TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/17/2025
SHEN, HONG-IIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/17/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$353K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 15%Other / private 28%

This home reported $353K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$275per resident / day
operating cost
$8,346per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$255per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675379. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next