Copperas Cove Nursing & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 75.3 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.88 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.16 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.96 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.17 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and ensure each resident received adequate supervision for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure CNA A did not provide personal care for Resident #1 without another staff member (which he required) on 07/27/25. She yanked on his right arm when attempting to roll him to his side, and he heard a pop. He was in excruciating pain and was subsequently diagnosed with a shoulder sprain at the hospital. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 07/27/25 and ended on 07/29/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of pain, injury, and hospitalization. Findings included:Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-10-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and service to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing for 1 (Resident # 1) of 6 (Resident's 2.3.4.5.amd 6) residents reviewed for following hospital discharge orders. The facility failed to follow hospital discharge orders for follow up with Urology secondary to a urethral stent (a thin tube placed between the kidney and bladder to help urine flow) placement on 4/26/2024. On 10/12/24 at 5:10 PM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 10/16/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of Isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. This failure resulted in Resident # 1 with worsening medical condition and Hospitalization. Finding included: Review of Resident # 1's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year old male…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers and did not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates they were unavoidable, and a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to complete wound care treatment for Resident #1 on 01/03/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/05/2026, 02/07/2026, 02/08/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of rapid wound deterioration.Findings included:A record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/11/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included pressure ulcer of sacral region,(shield -shaped bone at the base of the lumbar spine connecting the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for complete and accurate records.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's wound care cleaning was documented completed in PCC for 01/10/2026, 01/25/2026, 02/14/2026, 02/17/2026, 02/19/2026, 02/21/2026, 02/23/2026, 02/26/2026, 03/06/2026, 03/07/2026, 03/10/2026, 03/11/2026, 03/13/2026, 03/16/2026, 03/17/2026, 03/22/2026, 03/23/2026, and 03/30/2026.This failure could place residents of staff not knowing whether treatment and services were provided for. Findings include:A record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/11/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included pressure ulcer of sacral region,(shield -shaped bone at the base of the lumbar spine connecting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 3 of 8 residents (Residents #1, #2, & #3) reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, & #3's call lights were within reach on 12/09/2025.This failure could place residents at risk of their needs not being metFindings include:Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 12/10/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: Epilepsy (a brain disorder causing recurrent seizure), Alzheimer's disease (progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), and muscle weakness (loss of strength in muscles making it difficult to move or perform physical task).Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-26 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing data was posted daily and readily accessible to residents and visitors with all required information for 1 of 1 days reviewed (9/23/2025) for nurse staffing posting.The facility failed to post accurate daily staffing information on 9/23/2025. This failure could place residents, families, and visitors at risk of not being informed of the census and number of staff working each day to provide care on all shifts.Findings included:During an observation on 9/23/2025 at 12:45 PM, the daily staffing census information was posted on the wall outside the DON office dated 8/21/2025; 8/22/2025; 8/26/2025, 8/27/2025; 8/29/2025.During an interview on 9/25/2025 at 11:30 a.m., the DON stated it was her job or the ADON to post the staffing on the daily basis. The negative outcome would be no one knows what the staffing was for the day.During an interview on 9/25/2025 at 11:35 a.m., the ADON stated it was her job or the DONs job to post the daily staffing. She stated nobody would know what the staffing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the need of each resident. On 2 of the 4 medication carts reviewed the facility failed to establish a system of record of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation at each shift change. This failure could place residents at risk of drug diversions and could result in diminished health and well-being.Findings Include: Record review of the change of shift narcotic count sheets for the medication cart on B Hall reflected missing documentation on the Narcotic count sheet for the following:*9/17/2025 1st shift on-coming and off -going shifts, *9/18/2025 1st shift off-going,*9/22/2025 1st shift on-coming and off- going shift, and *9/23/2024 1st shift on-coming and off-going. Record review of Narcotic count sheet for the mediation cart on D hall reflected missing documentation for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biological were stored under proper temperature for 1of 1 Medication Rooms reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the correct temperature for the storage of refrigerated medications for 4 days in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER]. The facility failed to check the medication storage temperature for 10 of 23 days for the month of September 2024.This failure could place residents receiving medication at risk for lack of drug efficacy.Findings included:During an observation and record review of the Refrigerator Temperature Log for the month of September 2025 in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] on 09/24/2025 at 10:19AM temperature readings were below 36 degrees Fahrenheit for 4 days.*9/4/2025 34 degrees F*9/13/2025 32 degrees F*9/14/2025 30 degrees F*9/15/2025 32 degrees F The out-of-range temperatures read from 30 degrees Fahrenheit to 34 degrees Fahrenheit. The temperature of the medication refrigerator was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure food safety by not consistently monitoring, discarding expired food, maintaining sanitary kitchen. These failures can place residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included:Observation in the kitchen on 9/23/2025 at 9:15 AM of refrigerator #1 reflected a bag of Pepperoni was not sealed. Observation in the kitchen on 9/23/2025 at 9:20 AM of refrigerator #2 reflected the Ready Care Thickening water that had an expiration date of 4-9-2025. Observation in the kitchen on 9/23/2025 at 9:26 AM of refrigerator #3 reflected the Sour cream and ketchup in individualized containers were in a zip-lock bag dated 9/17/25 with no expiration date. Observation in the kitchen and interview on 9/23/2025 at 9:35 AM revealed the one pantry in the kitchen reflected a bag of Hot dog buns opened labeled date of 9-12-2025, and the DM said that bread has a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 1 (Resident #2) of 4 residents reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to follow their policies and procedures and provide full-time translation or interpretation services to Resident #2, a [NAME] speaking resident.This failure could place residents at risk of miscommunication between the resident and staff, lead to misunderstandings about a resident's medical condition and treatment options, and improper care or inappropriate treatments or prescriptions.Findings include:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 11/14/25, revealed a seventy-four-year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (progressive decline in episodic memory, with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to respect a resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to obtain a valid DNR for Resident #1 which resulted, on [DATE], in Resident #1 receiving CPR when she was found unresponsive. This failure could place residents at risk of their rights to refuse or discontinue treatment being disrespected, being resuscitated against their wishes or placed on life support.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed an eighty-four-year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses included adult failure to thrive (syndrome of weight loss, decreased appetite and poor nutrition, and inactivity, often accompanied by dehydration, depressive symptoms, impaired immune function, and low…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise for one (Resident #1) of 7 (seven) residents reviewed for weight loss.The facility failed to follow its procedures and provide effective interventions to prevent weight loss in Resident #1, who had a 10.39% weight loss between 10/09/25 and 11/03/25. Resident #1 was not weighed when she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 was not weighed weekly x 4 weeks after her admission to the facility. Nutritional supplements were recommended by the RD on 10/15/25. They were ordered 11/14/25. Resident #1 died on [DATE].This failure could place residents at risk of dehydration, malnutrition, functional decline and death.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,242 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $15,177 — penalty dated 2025-07-30
• $9,065 — penalty dated 2024-09-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GULF COAST LTC PARTNERS — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX