Avina on Division
517 E Division St, Fond du Lac, WI 54935 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 50 certified beds · (920) 921-6800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.5% | 16.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.2% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.5% | 2.7% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.9% | 5.7% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.4% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.7% | 18.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.4% | 16.9% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.3% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 12.2% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.8% | 24.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.9% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 70.6% | 82.2% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.0%CMS range 34.2–66.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.7–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 34.5 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.06 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-03-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to employ a Registered Nurse (RN) ensuring the minimum requirement of having an RN providing services at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week and failed to employ an RN who was designated to serve as the Director of Nursing (DON) on a full-time basis. These failures caused the facility's nursing staff department to have no oversight of Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) and non-licensed personnel (Certified Medication Aide/Medication Technician [CMA/MTs]) who administered medications which placed all residents at risk of not being able to attain or maintain their highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This had the potential to affect 34 of 34 residents who resided at the facility. The facility failed to have adequate nursing oversight of licensed nurses who administered medications and cared for residents with high acuity needs, including Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct an assessment for a patient-reported change in condition for one of five residents (Resident (R) 2) reviewed for change in condition. On 02/17/26, R2 complained to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 that she might need to go to the hospital. LPN1 did not immediately assess the resident to determine if R2 had an emergent need after R2 reported respiratory symptoms. This resulted in R2's Family Member (F1) calling 911. R2 was transferred to the hospital and was diagnosed with acute hypoxic respiratory failure, chronic pulmonary emboli (PE) without acute cor pulmonale, and bronchiectasis with acute lower respiratory infection.Findings Include:According to BOARD OF NURSING N 6.03 Chapter N 6 STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR REGISTERED NURSES AND LICENSED PRACTICAL NURSES> N 6.04 Standards of practice for licensed practical nurses. (1) PERFORMANCE OF ACTS IN BASIC PATIENT SITUATIONS. In the performance of acts in basic patient situations, the L.P.N. shall,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-03-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 5 sampled residents (R2). R2's infectious disease doctor ordered two oral antibiotics on 01/15/26 upon completion of an intravenous (IV) antibiotic for discitis osteomyelitis (a serious spinal infection affecting vertebrae and intervertebral discs, characterized by severe, persistent back pain). The facility did not transcribe the order or administer the antibiotics until after R2 was sent to the emergency room (ER) with redevelopment of previously cleared osteomyelitis. Additionally, R2 was intravenously administered another resident's antibiotic on 01/13/26.Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Errors, dated 2025, revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by ensuring residents receive care and services safely in an environment free of significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection. This practice had the potential to affect all of the 31 residents residing in the facility.The facility's Water Management Plan (WMP) did not include water management team members who were knowledgeable about the facility's high-risk plumbing fixtures, identify all locations where Legionella could grow and spread, or identify where control measures should be applied based on where Legionella could grow and spread. Findings include: The facility's Water Management Program (WMP) policy, dated 12/10/25, indicates: It is the policy of this facility to establish a water management plan for reducing the risk of legionellosis (illnesses caused by Legionella bacteria such as Legionnaires' disease) and other opportunistic pathogens in the facility's water systems .1. A water management…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff and resident interview, the facility did not ensure a sanitary, comfortable, and home-like environment for 6 residents (R) (R7, R8, R4, R9, R6, and R5) of 6 sampled residents. R7's shared bathroom contained a walk-in shower that contained a tan/gray/green chalky substance and a cardboard box of personal belongings that were scattered on the shower floor. An unmarked plastic cup of green, cylindrical pellets was set on an area that surrounded the top of the shower. R7's room also contained brown discoloration in the corner of the ceiling and a deteriorating area that contained water damaged plaster and trim that measured approximately 5 inches by 5 inches behind the door in the interior corner of the room.R8's room contained brown discoloration in the corner of the ceiling. R4 and R9's shared bathroom contained a walk-in shower. The shower floor contained a rust-colored substance and stains. The shower contained a cardboard box of personal belongings with items scattered on the shower floor. R6's private bathroom contained bulging drywall and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provde the appropriate care and treatment to promote healing of a pressure injury for 1 resident (R) (R3) of 1 sampled resident.R3 had a stage 4 pressure injury on right lateral lumbar region. During wound care, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-D used soiled scissors to cut silver alginate that was applied to R3's pressure injury. In addition, LPN-D opened a 4x4 gauze package, removed the gauze, and sprayed it with wound cleanser. LPN-D placed the wet gauze on the outside of the gauze package that had touched soiled surfaces.Findings include:The facility's Pressure Injury Prevention and Management policy, revised 6/17/25, indicates: .Provide treatment and services to heal the pressure ulcer/injury, prevent infection .evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice will be provided for all residents.From 4/29/26 to 4/30/26, Surveyor reviewed R3's medical record. R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure parenteral medications were administered in accordance with a physician order for 1 resident (R) (R2) of 1 sampled resident.Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-D administered two intravenous (IV) normal saline (NS) flushes through a midline catheter for R2 who did not have an order for the flushes. In addition, R2's midline catheter was not accurately measured by Director of Nursing (DON)-B or reflected in R2's medical record.Findings include:The facility's PICC/Midline/CVAD Dressing Change policy, revised 1/2026, indicates: .To inspect the catheter and hub .use sterile measuring tape to measure external catheter length of the catheter from hub to skin entry to ensure it has not migrated.The facility's Medication Orders policy, dated 1/5/26, indicates: .Medications should be administered only upon the signed order of a person lawfully authorized to prescribe.From 4/29/26 to 4/30/26, Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record. R2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review including review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) report, review of the documented narrative from the local police department's body-worn camera, review of job descriptions, review of facility policies and procedures, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nurse staffing was available to meet the immediate care needs of the residents, failed to ensure staff had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety, and failed to ensure Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) and Certified Medication Aides/Medication Technicians (CMAs/MTs) provided services that met professional standards of practice. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all 34 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include:The facility's undated job description titled, Certified Medication Aide included: .Purpose of Your Job Position .The primary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure expired food was discarded and the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. These failures placed 34 of 34 residents who resided at the facility at risk of foodborne illnesses.Findings include:Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Food Safety and Sanitation, revealed .All local, state and federal standards and regulations will be followed in order to assure a safe and sanitary food and nutrition services department .4. Food Storage .Food is protected from contamination .Perishable foods with expiration dates are used prior to the use by date on the package .Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Labeling and Dating, revealed, .2. All foods will be monitored for expiration date, use-by-date. Foods that are out of date will be discarded .Observation on 03/26/26 at 3:19 PM of the kitchen's walk-in cooler revealed the following items that were either labeled by the facility to be past the use-by date or expired per the manufacturer's expiration date:A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-28 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review of the facility's Administrator's Job Description, the Administrator failed to administer the facility in a manner that ensured a Director of Nursing (DON) and/or a Registered Nurse (RN) was employed to provide oversight of nursing staff that enabled the facility to attain and maintain the highest practicable care and well-being of each resident. The lack of nursing oversight due to the Administrator's decisions caused or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. Administration was aware the facility did not have a qualified Director Nursing overseeing resident care since 3/13/26.Administration was aware there was not an RN in the building for a minimum of 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. On 03/27/26, the facility was notified that an Immediate Jeopardy was identified in the area of S483.35 Nursing Services and was related to Administration of the facility. Findings include:Review of an undated job description titled, Job Description-Administrator, provided by the facility, revealed, Purpose of your…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of the local police department's body worn camera (BWC) report, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident (R) 2) was treated with dignity related to toileting needs. R2 was care planned to use the toilet; however, staff used a bedpan and/or incontinence pad. This caused R2 to feel discomfort and embarrassment. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Dignity, revised 01/2025, revealed, The facility shall promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality. The facility shall consider the resident's lifestyle and personal choices identified through the assessment processes to obtain a picture of his or her individual needs and preferences. Staff shall carry out activities in a manner which assists the resident to maintain and enhance his/her self-esteem and self-worth.Review of R2's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure kitchen equipment and dishware used to serve residents were free from residue accumulation. This practice had the potential to affect all of the 33 residents residing in the facility. Kitchen equipment and dishware used to serve residents contained visible white residue that made it difficult to tell if the equipment and dishware were clean. Findings include: During an initial kitchen tour on 5/19/25 at 10:55 AM, Surveyor interviewed Dietary Manager (DM)-F who stated the facility follows the Federal Food Code. The 2022 FDA Food Code documents at 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils: (A) Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. (B) The food-contact surfaces of cooking equipment and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations. The 2022 FDA Food Code documents at 4-602.13 Nonfood-Contact Surfaces: Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure garbage and refuse were properly disposed of in outside garbage receptacles. This practice had the potential to affect all of the 33 residents residing in the facility. The garbage containers outside the facility were not covered and contained loose/unbagged garbage. Findings include: The facility's Disposal of Garbage and Refuse policy, revised 12/2/24, indicates: .1. Garbage shall be disposed of in refuse containers with plastic liners and lids. 2. Garbage and refuse containers shall be durable, cleanable, and free from cracks or leaks and covered when not in use .7. Refuse containers and dumpsters outside the facility shall be designed and constructed to have tightly fitting lids, doors, or covers. Containers and dumpsters shall be kept covered when not being loaded . During an initial kitchen tour on 5/19/25 at 10:55 AM, Surveyor and Dietary Manager (DM)-F observed two approximately 8 feet long by 3 feet wide rolling containers positioned against the building outside the right side of the door.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 33 residents residing in the facility. R17 was on contact precautions. On 5/19/25, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-K twice entered R17's room and administered medication without wearing the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). On 5/19/25, Laundry Aide (LA)-C transported uncovered clean clothes in hallways and delivered them to residents' rooms. On 5/20/25, LA-C wheeled a cart of clean linens from the clean side of the laundry room through the dirty side and into the housekeeping closet. In addition, a soiled linen hamper was observed in the clean area of the laundry room. Findings include: The facility's Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) policy, revised 11/2024, indicates: PPE refers to a variety of barriers used alone or in combination to protect mucous membranes, skin, and clothing from contact with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a call light was within reach for 1 resident (R) (R17) of 15 sampled residents. On 5/20/25, R17's call light was out of reach and not accessible to R17. Findings include: The facility's Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response policy, dated 3/6/25, indicates staff will ensure the call light is within reach of the resident and secured as needed. The call system will be accessible to the resident while in their bed or other sleeping accommodations within the resident's room. On 5/20/25, Surveyor reviewed R17's medical record. R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side. R17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/8/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R17 had intact cognition. The MDS assessment also indicated R17 had impairment on one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate administration of medication for 2 residents (R) (R8 and R11) of 15 sampled residents. On 5/19/25, Surveyor observed medication at R8's bedside hours after the morning medication pass. Staff did not return and check on R8 to ensure the medication was taken but documented the medication as administered. In addition, R8 did not have a quarterly self-administration of medication assessment. On 5/19/25, Surveyor observed Medication Technician (MT)-E prepare mediation for R11 and leave the medication at the bedside. R11 had an order to self-administer medication but did not have a current self-administration of medication assessment. Findings include: The facility's Resident Self-Administration of Medication policy, dated 4/9/25, indicates: It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's right to self-administer medication. A resident may only self-administer medication after the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-27 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not designate a person to serve as the food and nutrition services director who was a certified dietary manager, had a national certification for food service management and safety from a national accrediting body, or had an associates or higher level degree in food service management or hospitality. This had the potential to affect all 31 residents residing in the facility. Dietary Manager (DM)-D did not complete an approved dietary manager or food service manager certification course or other related education. Findings include: On 3/26/24 at 11:27 AM, Surveyor interviewed DM-D who indicated DM-D completed a ServSafe course in October of 2023. DM-D indicated DM-D started as the Dietary Manager approximately 2 years prior and had no prior experience or training in food service management. DM-D indicated DM-D was learning what needs to be done to meet the regulations and acknowledged there were things DM-D was not aware DM-D should be doing, including cleaning and disinfecting the filter on the ice machine, maintaining a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 31 residents residing in the facility. The ice machine contained black slime on the back inside filter. Two microwaves contained dried food debris. The freezer in the solarium did not contain a thermometer and a temperature log was not maintained. Multiple food items did not contain open or use-by dates. Logs that contained parts per million (PPM) testing of the sanitizer buckets were not maintained. Findings include: On 3/25/24 at 8:27 AM, Surveyor began an initial kitchen tour with Dietary Aide (DA)-E. On 3/26/24 at 11:27 AM, Dietary Manager (DM)-D indicated the facility follows the Wisconsin Food Code. Ice Machine: The Wisconsin Food Code documents at 4-602.11 Equipment Food Contact Surfaces and Utensils: (E) .Surfaces of utensils and equipment contacting food that is not time/temperature control for safety food shall be cleaned: (4) In equipment such as ice bins and beverage dispensing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR) requirements were met for 4 Residents (R) (R24, R26, R5, and R133) of 5 sampled residents. R24 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. R24's PASRR Level I Screen did not indicate R24 had a suspected intellectual disability/developmental disability (ID/DD). The facility did not obtain county exemption for R24's admission and the facility was unable to provide documentation that R24 was referred for a PASRR Level II Screen. R26's PASRR Level I Screen was not completed timely and a county exemption was not obtained. R5's PASRR Level I Screen indicated R5 had a mental illness (MI) and received medications to treat the symptoms/behaviors of the MI. The facility did not obtain county exemption for R5's admission and R5's PASRR Level II Screen was not completed timely. R133's PASRR Level I Screen indicated R133 had an MI and received medications to treat the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the wishes of 2 Residents (R) (R23 and R25) of 14 residents were followed when they admitted R23 and R25 whose Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) paperwork indicated R23 and R25 did not want to be admitted to a nursing home. R23 had an activated POAHC prior to admission to the facility on 3/13/23. R23's POAHC paperwork indicated R23 did not want R23's POAHC to admit R23 to a nursing home. R25 had an activated POAHC prior to admission to the facility on [DATE]. R25's POAHC paperwork indicated R25 did not want R25's POAHC to admit R25 to a nursing home. Findings include: Wisconsin Chapter 155.20(2)(c)2 indicates: A health care agent may consent to the admission of a principal to the following facilities, under the following conditions: a. To a nursing home, for recuperative care for a period not to exceed 3 months, if the principal is admitted directly from a hospital inpatient unit, unless the hospital admission was for psychiatric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a physician and Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) were notified of a change in condition for 1 Resident (R) (R25) of 14 sampled residents. R25's physician and POAHC were not notified when staff observed a bump and bruise on R25's head on 2/26/24. Findings include: On 3/25/24, Surveyor reviewed R25's medical record. R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. R25's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/6/24, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 out of 15 which indicated R25 had severe cognitive impairment. R25 had an activated POAHC (POAHC-M and POAHC-P) and received Hospice services. A hospice communication form, dated 2/26/24, contained handwritten and highlighted information on the bottom of the form that indicated: Noticed bruise/bump right eye/cheek/eyebrow. Spoke to (Certified Nursing Assistant) (CNA-N) who noticed the injuries at lunch. R25's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not accurately code Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments correctly for 2 Residents (R) (R23 and R24) of 14 sampled residents. R23's MDS assessment, dated 3/19/24, did not indicate R23 smoked. R24 had a physician order for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. R24's MDS assessment, dated 2/11/24, did not indicate R24 used a CPAP machine. Findings include: 1. R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke). Between 3/25/24 and 3/27/24, Surveyor reviewed R23's medical record. R23's medical record contained a smoking care plan and R23 was observed smoking outside. R23's Annual MDS assessment, dated 3/19/24, indicated R23 did not use tobacco. On 3/27/24 at 12:10 PM, Surveyor interviewed Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC)-J who indicated MDSC-J codes residents' MDS assessments, works in the facility approximately 2 days per week, and also works at a sister facility. MDSC-J indicated MDSC-J…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure smoking materials were safely stored for 1 Resident (R) (R23) of 2 residents. R23's care plan indicated staff should store R23's smoking materials when not in use. On multiple occasions from 3/25/24 through 3/26/24, Surveyor observed cigarettes and a lighter on R23's bedside table. Findings include: The facility's undated Smoking/Vaping Safety policy indicates: The facility has the right to enforce a policy prohibiting residents from keeping any smoking materials in his/her possession for health, safety, and security reasons. A smoking assessment will be completed to determine the level of assistance and supervision needed during smoking, the ability to carry and store smoking materials, and if a smoking apron is indicated. The plan of care shall reflect the results of this assessment. This assessment will be completed upon admission, quarterly, and with significant change. The facility's undated Smoking/Vaping guidelines…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R11) of 2 residents received the necessary care and services for respiratory therapy. The facility provided R11 with respiratory therapy via continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) without a physician's order. In addition, R11's need for and use of CPAP therapy was not care planned, assessed, or monitored. Findings include: The facility's CPAP Therapy policy, dated 5/3/22, indicates: .CPAP is used to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The goals of this therapy include improve ventilation, improve quality of sleep, decrease hospitalizations, improve cognitive function, improve oxygen saturation during sleep, decrease work of breathing, and improve lung compliance. Procedure: 10) Verify physician orders .18) If ordered, adjust ramp to prescribed time. Cleaning and Maintenance: 4) Follow these steps for cleaning your CPAP patient circuit .I. Remove the headgear from the mask or nasal pillows…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food preferences were honored for 1 Resident (R) (R4) of 14 sampled residents. R4's meal card stated NO GRAVY and no mashed potatoes. On 3/26/24, R4 was served mashed potatoes with gravy for lunch. Findings include: On 3/25/24, Surveyor reviewed R4's medical record. R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/10/23, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R4 had intact cognition. R4's care plan indicated R4 was at risk for nutritional problems due to a diagnosis of adult failure to thrive and tolerated a general diet with soft or pureed foods per R4's preference. R4's activities of daily living self-care performance deficit related to osteoarthritis care plan, initiated on 3/6/23 and revised on 7/18/23, indicated R4 was able to eat items per choice with set up assistance and was allowed to choose pureed or soft foods.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a medical record contained accurate and complete information for 1 Resident (R) (R25) of 14 sampled residents. On 2/26/24, staff discovered a bump and bruise on R25's head. R25's medical record did not contain information regarding the injury. Findings include: On 3/25/24, Surveyor reviewed R25's medical record. R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. R25's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/6/24, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 out of 15 which indicated R25 had severely impaired cognition. R25 had Activated [NAME] of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC-M and POAHC-P) and received Hospice services. Surveyor reviewed a Hospice note, dated 2/26/24. The note was handwritten, scanned into R25's medical record, and contained highlighted information at the bottom that indicated: Noticed bruise/bump right eye/cheek/eyebrow. Spoke to Certified Nursing Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain and infection control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for 1 Resident (R) (R8) of 2 residents observed during the provision of care. During an observation of peri and Foley care for R8, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-G did not appropriately remove gloves and cleanse hands. Findings include: The facility's Hand Hygiene/Handwashing policy indicates: Hand hygiene means cleaning your hands by using either handwashing (washing hands with soap and water), antiseptic hand wash, or antiseptic hand rub (i.e. alcohol-based hand sanitizer including foam or gel). Examples of when to perform hand hygiene (either alcohol-based hand sanitizer or handwashing): ~Before and after having direct contact with a patient's intact skin (taking a pulse or blood pressure, performing physical examinations, lifting the patient in bed). ~After contact with blood, body fluids or excretions, mucous membranes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked at the facility for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week on multiple dates from April of 2022 to March of 2023. The facility did not have an RN in the facility for at least eight consecutive hours on multiple days and weekends dating back to April of 2022. Findings include: State of Wisconsin DHS (Department of Health Services) 132.62 contains the following information: Nursing services .(2) Nursing administration .(b) Charge nurses in skilled care facilities and intermediate care facilities. 1. Staffing requirement. A skilled nursing facility shall have at least one charge nurse on duty at all times, and: a. A facility with fewer than 60 residents in need of skilled nursing care shall have at least one Registered Nurse, who may be the director of nursing services, on duty as charge nurse during every daytime tour of duty . From 3/5/23 to 3/7/23, Surveyor reviewed the facility's nurse staffing schedules dating back to April of 2022. The following dates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-07 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a written notification of transfer was provided for 4 Residents (R) (R188, R14, R3, and R20) of 4 residents reviewed for transfer notification. The facility did not provide written notification of transfer, including advocacy information, to R188, R14, R3, and R20 (or their representatives) when transferring care responsibilities to the hospital. Findings include: 1. On 3/5/23, Surveyor reviewed R188's closed medical record which indicated R188 was transferred to Hospital-R on 2/14/23 with shortness of breath, bilateral lower extremity edema, and urethral pain. On 3/5/23 at 1:51 PM, Surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-F regarding notification provided at the time of R188's hospital transfer. LPN-F verified written notice of transfer was not provided to R188 on 2/14/23 when R188 was transferred to Hospital-R. On 3/5/23 at 2:25 PM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A regarding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
4. On 3/5/23 at 10:52 AM, Surveyor entered R8's room and observed a charger connected to an outlet in the room. R8 stated the charger was for a motorized scooter and verified the motorized scooter was always charged in R8's room. See interview under example 2. Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the safety of 4 Residents (R) (R14, R17, R18 and R8) of 6 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards related to motorized scooters, smoking and unwitnessed falls. The facility did not complete neurological checks to monitor for nervous system issues after R14's unwitnessed falls. The facility did not charge R17's motorized scooter in an area to minimize damage from risk of fire. The facility did not provide supervision per R18's assessment and care plan or ensure R18's smoking materials were stored safely when not in use. The facility did not charge R8's motorized scooter in an area to minimize damage from risk of fire. Findings include: The facility did not provide a requested neurological checks policy. The facility's form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored under sanitary conditions. This practice had the potential to affect multiple residents, including R11 and R12. In November 2022, staff stopped monitoring the temperature of a refrigerator and freezer that contained resident food and beverages. Staff did not apply dating practices to opened time and temperature controlled foods for safety. Staff did not discard expired foods and beverages, including items labeled for R11 and R12. Findings include: On 3/5/23 at 8:50 AM, Dietary Manager (DM)-K stated DM-K was uncertain which standard guided facility practices and indicated DM-K was in the process of completing dietary manager training online. Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Monitoring FDA Food Code 2022 documented at 3-501.16 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding. (A) Except during preparation, cooking, or cooling, or when time is used as the public health control as specified under §3-501.19, and except as specified under ¶ (B) and in ¶ (C) of this section,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a legal guardian exercised rights within the limits set by Wisconsin (WI) state statute chapter 55 for 3 Residents (R) (R14, R27, and R4) of 6 sampled residents. The facility did not file a petition for protective placement for R14, who had a legal guardian, when R14's stay at the facility exceeded 60 days from admission on [DATE]. The facility did not file a petition for protective placement for R27, who had a legal guardian, when R27's stay at the facility exceeded 60 days from admission on [DATE]. The facility did not ensure R4's protective placement was annually reviewed by the county department and deemed appropriate. Findings include: WI state statute chapter 55.055(1)(b) contains the following information: The guardian of an individual who has been adjudicated incompetent may consent to the individual's admission to a nursing home or other facility not specified in par. (a) for which protective placement is otherwise required for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a legal guardian was provided written notification of a payer source change with appeal rights information in the recipient's preferred language when Medicare Part A benefits ended for 1 Resident (R) (R27) of 3 residents reviewed for advanced beneficiary notifications. The facility did not provide R27's legal guardian (Legal Guardian (LG)-E) with written notification in R27 and LG-E's preferred language (Spanish) and a professional translator to explain the information verbally when presented via telephone. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed R27's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) forms and noted the NOMNC was not signed by LG-E; however, telephone notification to LG-E was documented. Surveyor noted translator information was not included and both forms were printed in English. R27's care plan documented R27's primary and preferred language was Spanish. On 3/6/23 at 11:00 AM, Surveyor interviewed Social Worker (SW)-C…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure written notification of the facility's bed-hold policy was provided for 2 Residents (R) (R188 and R14) of 4 residents reviewed for bed-hold policy notification. The facility did not provide written notification of the bed hold policy to R188 when the facility transferred R188's care to Hospital-R. The facility did not provide written notification of the bed hold policy to Legal Guardian (LG)-D when the facility transferred R14's care to a local. hospital. 1. On 3/5/23, Surveyor reviewed R188's closed medical record which indicated R188 was transferred to the hospital on 2/14/23. R188's medical record did not contain a written bed-hold notification. On 3/5/23 at 1:51 PM, Surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-F regarding written bed-hold notification provided at the time of R188's transfer to Hospital-R. LPN-F verified a bed-hold notification was not provided to R188 at the time of the transfer because providing a written notification slipped LPN-F's mind at the time of the non-emergent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-07 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R20) of 5 sampled residents met the Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR) requirements. R20's Level 1 PASRR documented R20 had a current diagnosis of a major mental disorder. No further PASRR screens were completed for R20. Findings include: From [DATE] to [DATE], Surveyor reviewed R20's medical record. Surveyor noted R20's medical record contained a Level I PASRR; however, a Level II PASRR was not submitted as required. R20 had a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia and was prescribed the antipsychotic medications Clozaril and fluphenazine. Surveyor noted a Level I PASRR screen was completed on [DATE] and indicated R20 was suspected of having a serious mental illness. In Section A of the PASRR Level I, Question 1 asks, Does the person have a major mental disorder under the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edition, revised (DSM III-R) or DSM 5? The yes box was checked. In Section B,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure activities were designed and provided to meet interests for 1 Resident (R) (R14) of 1 resident reviewed for activities. The facility did not comprehensively assess, care plan, and provide activities for R14 since R14's admission on [DATE]. Findings include: From 3/5/23 through 3/7/23, Surveyor reviewed R14's medical record which documented R14 was admitted with diagnoses including expressive aphasia (the inability to vocally express one's self). Legal Guardian (LG)-D was responsible for R14's decision making. R14's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) activities assessment, dated 8/7/22, indicated R14 was not interviewable and LG-D was not interviewed as part of the assessment. R14's activities care plan documented R14 had little or no activity involvement related to depression, disinterest, immobility, physical limitations, and poor adjustment to the facility/unit. R14's activity care plan documented R14 preferred to stay in R14's room alone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure treatment and care were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 Resident (R) (R11 and R24) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for weight monitoring. R11 had an order for daily weights and to update the physician with weight changes of plus or minus 3 pounds per day or plus or minus 5 pounds per week. The facility did not consistently monitor R11's weight and/or notify R11's physician of weight changes. R24 had an order for monthly weights. The facility did not consistently monitor R24's weight on a monthly basis. Findings include: The National Library of Medicine, in a web-based article published in 2022 regarding Furosemide, indicated: A boxed warning suggests the cautious use of Furosemide as it is a potent diuretic, which can predispose to excessive loss of water and electrolytes, resulting in dehydration with electrolyte depletion .Careful monitoring of the patient's clinical condition, daily weight, fluids…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure creation of a culturally competent, trauma-informed care plan for 1 Resident (R) (R14) of 1 resident with an identified trauma history and assessed as having intermittent issues with coping and functioning related to surviving trauma. The facility did not develop a trauma-informed care plan after assessing R14 as a trauma survivor on 10/27/22. Findings include: According to Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA, 2014) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207191/), The impact of trauma can be subtle, insidious, or outright destructive. How an event affects an individual depends on many factors, including characteristics of the individual, the type and characteristics of the event(s), developmental processes, the meaning of the trauma, and sociocultural factors. SAMHSA explains trauma causes immediate and delayed emotional, behavioral, physical, cognitive, and existential reactions. From 3/5/23 through 3/7/23, Surveyor reviewed R14's medical record which documented Legal Guardian…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R14) of 3 residents reviewed for behavioral health with a diagnosed mental health disorder and trauma history was provided with a Medical Doctor (MD) ordered psychiatric consult. The facility did not obtain a psychiatric consult for R14 after an MD ordered the consult on 9/14/22. Findings include: From 3/5/23 through 3/7/23, Surveyor reviewed R14's medical record which documented Legal Guardian (LG)-D was responsible for R14's decision making. R14's diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder and expressive aphasia (the inability to verbally communicate). R14 was prescribed escitalopram oxalate (a psychotropic medication used to treat anxiety and depression). R14's care plan did not identify target behaviors or non-pharmacological interventions for R14's mental health. On 10/27/22, the facility completed a brief trauma questionnaire with R14 based on head nodding and shaking (due to expressive aphasia) that indicated R14 experienced a serious accident, was in a natural or technological disaster,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure behavioral interventions and psychotropic medication monitoring was implemented for 1 Resident (R) (R14) of 5 residents reviewed for medications. The facility did not develop R14's psychotropic medication care plan, identify target behaviors, develop non-pharmacological interventions, or implement monitoring for target behaviors and medication side effects. Findings include: From 3/5/23 through 3/7/23, Surveyor reviewed R14's medical record which documented Legal Guardian (LG)-D was responsible for R14's decision making. R14's diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder and expressive aphasia (the inability to verbally communicate). R14 was prescribed escitalopram oxalate (a psychotropic medication used to treat anxiety and depression). R14's plan of care did not identify target behaviors or non-pharmacological interventions for R14's mental health. On 3/7/23 at 10:50 AM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A regarding R14. NHA-A reviewed R14's care plan with Surveyor and confirmed the only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-11-18 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility did not ensure garbage and refuse were properly disposed of in outside garbage storage receptacles. This practice had the potential to affect all 32 residents residing in the facility. The facility's outside garbage receptacles were open on 11/18/24 and were routinely left open during the AM shift. Findings include: On 11/18/24 at 8:22 AM, Surveyor and Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A observed two garbage receptacles outside the facility and noted both receptacle lids were open. NHA-A indicated a neighbor of the facility had issues with garbage left outside and yelled at staff. NHA-A indicated NHA-A talked with the landlord and staff were trying to keep the receptacle lids closed. NHA-A indicated AM staff had issues closing the lids due to their height, and maintenance staff made sure the lids were closed in the evening. NHA-A verified the receptacle lids were left open during the day and closed in the evening. On 11/18/24 at 10:23 AM, Surveyor interviewed Anonymous Person (AP) who indicated the facility didn't close the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-03-27 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the posted daily nurse staffing data was retained for a minimum of 18 months. This practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility did not retain daily nurse staffing data for the required minimum 18 months. Findings include: On 3/25/24, Surveyor reviewed the facility's nurse staffing posting and requested to review the previous three months of nurse staffing postings. On 3/26/24 at 10:30 AM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A who indicated the facility did not have the requested 3 months of nurse staffing postings. NHA-A stated the night nurse did not save the nurse staffing postings as required. On 3/27/24 at 2:15 PM, Surveyor completed a follow-up interview with NHA-A who stated staff education will be completed to ensure the nurse staffing postings are maintained going forward.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-30 for 15 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVINA HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRANDMAN, JOSEPH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 40% | since 10/22/2021 |
| REBEL, IGOR | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 10/22/2021 |
| TOPPER, AARON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/22/2021 |
| RHODE, ROSALINDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2021 |
| WEBER, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $641K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525522. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.