No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avina of Kenosha

3100 Washington Rd., Kenosha, WI 53144 · For profit - Corporation · 153 certified beds · (262) 658-4622 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)4 immediate-jeopardy citations$33,989 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $33,989 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-29)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3535 30th Ave · (262) 652-4878 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3825 39th Ave · (262) 658-8124 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2121 45th St · (262) 748-1111 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3800 42nd St · (262) 653-4050 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.2%16.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.7%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.6%5.7%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.8%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.9%18.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.5%16.9%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.3%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.5%24.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.2%15.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.3%82.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.0%23.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit31.8%15.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.671.661.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.642.291.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 125 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.0%CMS range 40.2–61.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 8.0–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.7–10.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.941.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.74
RN hours/ resident / day
0.73
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.00
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
49.0%
Total nursing turnover
27.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 153 beds and averages 88.1 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 65 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-24)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that residents with pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent new pressure injuries from developing for 8 (R50, R64, R65, R67, R70, R73, R78 and R235) of 9 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. * R78 developed a stage 4 pressure injury to the right posterior ankle despite the Facility knowing the resident was at risk for pressure injuries because the resident wore PRAFO boots. The Facility failed to perform checks each shift to monitor the skin under the boot to prevent skin issues from developing. The Facility failed to obtain written orders on length of time the PRAFO (contractor/LE (lower extremity) braces) boots should be worn. The resident's plan of care did not include interventions related to the PRAFO boots and was not updated for over a month regarding right posterior heel pressure wound after the discovery of the wound. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2023-02-02 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure staff provided basic life support to 1 (R37) of 1 Residents who required Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR.) The facility currently has 50 out of 92 residents who desire CPR (Full Code.) The failure of staff to immediately call a code for R37 on the overhead page system, failure to call 911, the failure to not start CPR immediately, the failure to bring the crash cart & AED (Automated External Defibrillator) into R37's room during the code, and RN-NN instructing LPN-MM to stop CPR created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE]. Administrator-A, DON (Director of Nursing)-B, Corporate Consultant-C, & Regional Clinical of Operations-D were notified of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 12:18 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on [DATE]. The deficient practice continues at a scope/severity of E (potential for more than minimal harm/pattern) as the facility continues to implement and monitor their action plan. Findings include: The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-02-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 1 resident (R87) with a significant change in condition had a comprehensive assessment performed. On [DATE] at approximately 5:30 a.m., R87's husband asked RN (Registered Nurse) T for assistance because R87 was not feeling well. RN T did not perform a comprehensive assessment into the change in condition. On [DATE] at approximately 6:00 a.m., R87 became unresponsive, 911 was called, and CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) was initiated. On [DATE], R87 was transferred and admitted into the hospital with a diagnosis of cardiac arrest. R87 subsequently passed away while in the hospital on [DATE]. The facility's failure to perform a comprehensive assessment into a change in condition created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE]. Surveyor notified NHA (Nursing Home Administrator) A of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 12:30 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on [DATE]. The deficient practice continues at a scope/severity of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-02-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. R68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, diabetes, dementia with behavioral disturbance, depression, and anxiety. R68's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] coded R68's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 14 indicting R68 was cognitively intact. R68 was independent for transfers and used a wheelchair for mobility throughout the facility. R68 was not coded as wandering or having behaviors. On 3/7/2021 at 4:23 PM in the progress notes, nursing charted R68 went outside with the smoking residents and tried to open the gate. A wanderguard was placed on R68 at that time. On 3/8/2021, R68's Elopement Risk Care Plan was initiated with the following interventions: -Apply wander guard; monitor function and placement. -Distract resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversions, structured activities, food, conversation, television, and books. -Monitor exit seeking behavior. On 10/20/2021, R68's Elopement Risk Care Plan was revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure that residents received adequate assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 (R65 and R67) of 7 residents reviewed for accidents. *R65 was transferred using a pivot transfer when R65's Care Plan indicated R65 transferred using a sit-to-stand lift. R65 sustained a broken tibia and fibula. *R67 was observed to not not have a fall mat in place per Care Plan. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure entitled Fall Prevention Program dated 5/2023 states in part: Procedure: 1. A care plan for fall prevention will be implemented and maintained to assure the safety of residents who are at risk. The program will be inclusive of measures which determine the individual needs of each resident by assessing the risk of falls, and implementation of appropriate staff interventions to assure adequate supervision is provided, and that assistive devices are utilized when necessary. Fall Incident Reports will be reviewed, and quality issues…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-04-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure a resident with an indwelling catheter was assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible for 1 (R65) of 3 residents reviewed with indwelling catheters. *R65 was admitted to the facility with a urinary catheter and the catheter was not removed due to resident convenience with no conversation of risks or benefits documented. R65 was hospitalized [DATE] and 1/6/2024 with sepsis due to a catheter associated urinary tract infection. Findings include: R65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of malnutrition, anorexia receiving the majority of nutrition through a gastrostomy tube, diabetes, polyneuropathy, adult failure to thrive, and depression. R65's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R65 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, had a Stage 4 pressure injury to the coccyx, and had an indwelling urinary catheter. R65 did not have an activated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-02-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 6 residents (R56) reviewed for pressure injuries. R56 developed multiple pressure injuries while in the facility with some of them healing. R56 developed a Stage 3 pressure injury to the left clavicle due to the head contracting to the left on 10/20/2022 that was last assessed on 11/15/2022. No weekly assessment was completed on 11/22/22. R56 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 11/28/2022. No documentation was found regarding the left clavicle pressure injury on readmission. On the Skin Integrity Care Plan, the intervention of a neck pillow was initiated on 12/20/2022. Observations were made on 1/23/2023 and 1/24/2023 of R56 without the neck pillow in place. On 1/24/2023, R56 developed an unstageable pressure injury to the left clavicle. R56 had incomplete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure family was informed of a change in condition for one resident (Resident (R) 6) of 20 residents reviewed. The facility failed to inform family when R6 developed a stage 3 heel pressure ulcer (full thickness loss of skin). Findings include:Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged home on [DATE]. R6 had diagnoses that included cancer with metastasis to the bone, and a stroke.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/24/25 revealed R6 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 which indicated R6 was cognitively intact.Review of a 10/28/25 Wound Care Note located in the Progress Notes tab of the EMR revealed, Stage 3 pressure ulcer on left heel, measures 5.0 x 5.0 x 0.2 cm [centimeters] had 100% Sanguineous drainage.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 1 (R3) of 3 residents reviewed for falls.R3 has a history of falls and is assessed to be at a high risk for falls. R3 has an active care plan intervention for Dycem (a versatile, non-slip material used for various applications, including wheelchair use) to be in place in R3's wheelchair to prevent falling. On 8/30/25, R3 slid out of R1's wheelchair and fell on the floor. R3 did not have Dycem in R3's wheelchair at the time of the fall. Findings include:The facility policy dated 1/30/23 and titled, Accidents/Fall Prevention Program, documents, in part: The facility strives to promote safety, dignity, and overall quality of life for its residents by providing an environment that is free from any hazards for which the facility has control and by providing appropriate supervision and interventions to prevent avoidable accidents. An immediate/initial care plan for fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared and served under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchens.* On 7/22/25 , Surveyor observed Cook-D not wearing a facial hair restraint that completely covered his hair from contacting exposed food while pureeing a lunch item.* On 7/22/25, Surveyor observed Dietary Aide- E handling exposed foods without all of his hair under the hair restraint. Cook- D did not have his facial hair restrained while handling exposed foods preparing the lunch meal trays.* On 7/22/25, Surveyor observed Cook- D not clean the thermometer probe between different foods as Cook-D took the temperature of several food items.These deficient practices have the potential to affect 90 of 90 residents who reside in the facility at the time of survey and who receive their meals from the main kitchen. All of the food for the facility is stored, prepared and served from the main kitchen.Findings include:The facility's policy with no date titled, Employ Sanitary Practices documents under the Policy section: All…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the mandatory staffing data, submitted for the second quarter of 2025 (January 1- March 31) was accurate, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). During review of the payroll-based-journal (PBJ) staffing data for the facility, the facility was triggered for excessively low weekend staffing. This had the potential to affect all 90 residents. Findings include: The facility's assessment dated [DATE] was reviewed, including staffing hours and acuity levels of care being provided. The facility's assessment documented staffing needs in the facility and triggered for low weekend staffing for the second quarter of 2025 Surveyor reviewed nursing schedules, along with the nurse staff posting hours and noted that there were no documented trends or gaps in weekend staff coverage. On 7/23/2025, at 9:09 AM, Surveyor interviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure admission and annual comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed in the timeframe prescribed in the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual for 6 (R35, R10, R75, R79, R87, and R34) of 8 residents reviewed for late MDS assessments.*R35's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] was completed after the specified timeframe.*R10's Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] was in progress and had not been completed at the time of survey, 7/21/2025.*R75's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] was in progress and had not been completed at the time of survey, 7/21/2025.*R79's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] was in progress and had not been completed at the time of survey, 7/21/2025.*R87's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] was completed after the specified timeframe.*R34's Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] was in progress and had not been completed at the time of survey, 7/21/2025.Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure admission, quarterly, and discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed and transmitted in the timeframe prescribed in the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual for 5 (R102, R35, R79, R87, and R69) of 8 residents reviewed for late MDS assessments.*R102's Discharge Return Anticipated MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not completed or transmitted by the specified timeframe.*R35's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not transmitted by the specified timeframe.*R79's Discharge Return Anticipated MDS assessment dated [DATE] and R79's Entry tracking record dated 7/11/2025 were not completed or transmitted by the specified timeframe.*R87's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not transmitted by the specified timeframe.*R69's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not transmitted by the specified timeframe.Findings include:The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that food was prepared to conserve nutritive value and flavor. This has the potential to effect 4 of 4 ( R15, R49, R58, R106) residents residing at the facility whom receive a puree diet.*Cook-D was observed not following a recipe for preparing texture and modified consistency food for puree diets. Findings include:The facility's undated policy titled, Standardized Recipes documents under the Policy section: Standardized recipes will be used when preparing menu items.Under the Procedure section it documents: 1.) Standardized recipes ( in appropriate portion sizes) for each set of cycle menus will be maintained in the facility.2.) The director of dining services or designee will be responsible for adjusting and recording the recipes for the needed yield.3.) Cooks/chefs are expected to use and follow the recipes provided.On 7/22/25 at 10:55 AM, Surveyor observed [NAME] -D prepare pureed cornbread for the lunch meal. Cook- D stated that there are currently 5 residents who receive puree meals ( facility list…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility did not address and resolve grievances conveyed on behalf of 1 (R7) of 1 resident reviewed for grievances. * On 7/21/2025, Surveyor interviewed R7, regarding grievances that were reported to staff. R7 indicated reporting concerns with portion sizes of meals to R7's caring partner. R7's meal ticket didn't show double portions. R7 voiced concerns about getting double portions with every meal. Findings include:The facility's policy, titled Resident and Family Grievances, with implemented date of 3/4/2025 documents: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .10. Procedure:a. This facility will not retaliate or discriminate against anyone who files a grievance or participates in the investigation of the grievance.b. Staff member receiving the grievance will record the nature and specifics of the grievance on the designated grievance form or assist the resident or family member to complete the form.c. Forward the grievance form to the grievance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed in the timeframe prescribed in the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual for 1 (R69) of 8 residents reviewed for late MDS assessments.* R69's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] was completed after the specified timeframe.Findings include:The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual dated 10/2024 documents: The Quarterly assessment is an OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) non-comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type. The MDS completion date (item Z0500B) must be no later than 14 days after the ARD (Assessment Reference Date) (ARD + 14 calendar days).R69's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], per the RAI Manual, must be completed by 7/2/2025. R69's Quarterly MDS assessment was completed on 7/22/2025, 20 days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not revise care plans or complete a care conference for 2 (R61, R9) of 18 residents care plans that were reviewed. *R61 did not have hearing or depression focus areas added to R6's initial care plans. R61’s comprehensive care plan was not completed timely after admission to the facility. *R9 did not have a care conference after the MDS assessment 6/2025. Findings include: The facility's policy, titled Comprehensive Care Plans, with implemented date of 3/25/2025 documents: “Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: …1. The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident’s strengths and needs and will incorporate the resident’s personal cultural preferences in developing goals of care. All services provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, must meet professional standards of quality, and incorporate culturally competent in trauma-informed care as indicated.2. The Comprehensive Care plan will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, document review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper dishwasher temperature and sanitizer levels, failed to thaw liquid eggs in a safe manner; failed to ensure food in the refrigerator and dry storage was labeled, dated, and not past the use by date; failed to ensure food on the steam table was held at a safe temperature level; and failed to ensure utensils and dishes were clean in one of one kitchen and one of one rehabilitation unit. This had the potential to result in the spread of infections and food born illness for 86 of the 87 residents consuming food in the facility. Findings include: Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Sanitation of Dishes/Dish Machine revealed the low temperature dish machine should have a water temperature of 120 degrees F [Fahrenheit] and the sanitizer level should be 50 PPM [parts per million]. Review of the safe thawing Practice section of the undated facility's policy titled, General HACCP [Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point] Guidelines for Food Safety revealed food could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was served and received at palatable food temperatures for nine of nine residents (Resident (R) R2, R11, R8, R13, R15, R16, R17, R18, and R19) reviewed for palatability of 19 sample residents. This had the potential to result in residents not eating the food and resulting in weight loss. Findings include: Review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/03/25 revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact. During an interview on 05/08/25 at 8:25 AM, R2 stated the food was sometimes cold. Review of R11's quarterly MDS located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an ARD of 03/06/25 and revealed he had a BIMS score of 10 out of 15 which indicated he had moderately impaired cognition. During an interview on 05/09/25 at 5:31 AM, R11 stated the food was not always good and it was cold. During an interview on 05/09/25 at 8:00 AM, R8…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate door closure with an operating door latch for one of six residents (Resident (R) 4) reviewed for privacy of 12 sample residents. This failure resulted in the potential to affect resident safety, security, and privacy. Findings include: Review of the admission Record located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/15/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating R4 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 01/07/25 at 11:22 AM, R4's door was observed to have a towel and pillowcase draped over the inside corner of the door. R4 stated, That's to keep it shut because it doesn't stay closed. It's been like that since September. A CNA [Certified Nurse Aide] came…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a fingerstick blood sugar test (FSBS), and insulin was documented as administered, per the physician's order for one of three residents (Resident (R) 3) reviewed of 12 sample residents. This failure placed the resident at risk for serious medical consequences. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Errors, revised February 2023, revealed .Medication errors, once identified, will be evaluated to determine if considered significant or not by utilizing the following three general guidelines .Resident's Condition .If the resident's condition requires rigid control .or monitoring of lab values .Drug Category .If the medication is from a category that usually requires the resident to be titrated to a specific blood level .To prevent medication errors and ensure safe medication administration, nurses should verify the following information .Right medication, dose, route, and time of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and/or treatment administration record (TAR) was complete and accurate for two of 12 sample residents (Resident (R) 10 and R7) reviewed for accurate documentation. - R10's MARs were not accurately documented to show medications werev administered according to physician orders. -R7's TARs were not accurately completed to show consistent application of ordered treatments to R7's pressure injuries. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration-General Guidelines, revised January 2018, revealed .The individual who administers the medication dose records the administration on the resident's MAR/eMAR [electronic medication administration record] directly after the medication is given. At the end of each medication pass, the person administering the medications reviews the MAR/eMAR to ensure necessary doses were administered and documented. In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, menu review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for all the diets listed on the menu spreadsheet for 81 of 81 residents who receive food from the facility. Failure to follow the spread sheet had the potential to result in weight loss and for residents to feel hungry. Findings include: Review of the Client List Report dated 10/22/24 and provided by the facility, revealed the facility had 60 residents on regular consistency diets, 13 residents on mechanical soft consistency diets, and eight residents on puree consistency diets. The facility did not have any residents who were on tube feedings and did not receive their meals from the dietary department. During lunch observations on the north, south and west units on 10/22/24 from 11:50 AM to 12:40 PM, three unidentified residents stated they often did not get enough food during the meals. During an observation and interview on 10/22/24 at 11:29 AM, the [NAME] was observed serving the noon meal from the steam table in the kitchen. She stated she was serving the residents on all the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure water temperatures were maintained at safe and comfortable temperatures with the potential for burn-related injuries or for residents to receive showers at uncomfortable temperature levels for three of four units (South unit, North unit, and [NAME] unit) affecting 36 of 81 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Water Temperature Policy with an effective date of 10/22/24 revealed the acceptable range for water temperatures was between 110 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 120 degrees F. During an interview on 10/21/24 at 12:31 PM a resident wishing to remain anonymous stated the water was cold when they assisted her with a shower but lately it has been working. During an interview on 10/22/24 at 1:46 PM a resident wishing to remain anonymous stated the water at his bathroom sink had been very hot lately. During an interview on 10/22/24 at 10:25 PM a resident wishing to remain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a functioning call system with auditory alarms to alert staff when a resident called for assistance for one of three call light systems (North station). This could result in residents' needs/care being delayed unnecessarily for the 22 residents in the North Hall. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Call Light Policy revised 01/28/23 revealed, Purpose: To respond to resident's needs and requests in a timely manner .2. Make sure the call light is plugged in and in good working order. Call light system defects will be reported to the Maintenance Department for servicing . During an interview on 10/21/24 at 3:04 PM, Certified Medication Tech (CMT) 1 was behind the nursing station on the North wing and she stated the call light panel behind the nursing station did not work. When asked how long it had not worked, she stated she did not know and I would have to talk to maintenance . Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was a physician's order for oxygen therapy for one of two residents (Resident (R) 3) reviewed for oxygen therapy. The lack of physician's orders for oxygen therapy could lead to inappropriate oxygen therapy and medical compromise. Findings include: Review the facility's undated policy titled, Oxygen Administration, undated, revealed Oxygen will be safely administered per physician's orders .Procedure: If oxygen is continued beyond 24 hours, obtain a physician order. Review of R3's undated admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was most recently readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of R3's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 07/18/24 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR revealed the facility assessed the resident to have a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents medications were administered in accordance with their policy for one of three residents (Resident (R) 8) reviewed for medication administration out of 20 sampled residents. Specifically, R8 was ordered to be administered his medications via a gastrostomy tube (g-tube). The resident was administered his medications as a cocktail (administer more than one medication at a time); however, there was no physician order for the medications to be administered as a cocktail. This placed the resident at risk for his G-Tube to become clogged. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration-Gastrostomy Tube, dated 05/19/22 revealed Use liquid preparations whenever possible. Check with the pharmacist if in doubt about availability of medication in liquid form or whether tablets are crushable. Enteric-coated medications, sublingual tablets, and sustained release medications should never be crushed. lf more than one medication is being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that items in the reach in cooler and freezer were dated/labeled according to professional standards and ensure a large silver metal exhaust/vent located above the kitchen dishwasher was in good working condition. These failures had the potential to affect 80 of 81 residents who were served food from the facility kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Food Storage, revealed Sufficient storage facilities will be provided to keep foods safe, wholesome, and appetizing. Procedure: Leftover food will be stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely. Each item will be clearly labeled and dated before refrigerated. Leftover food is used within 7 days is discarded .Refrigerated food storage: All foods should be covered, labeled, and dated. All foods will be checked to assure that foods (including leftovers) will be consumed by their safe use by dates, or frozen, or discarded. The initial kitchen inspection was conducted with the Dietary Manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-29 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the outside garbage dumpster lids remained closed, and the garbage storage area was maintained in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage of pests with the potential to affect 81 of 81 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pest Control, effective 05/19/22, revealed Purpose: To prevent or control insects and rodents from spreading disease. Guidelines: The facility shall be kept in such condition and cleaning procedures used to prevent the harborage or feeding of insects or rodents. Observation made on 04/21/24 at 8:45 AM, of the outside garbage area revealed there to be three large metal garbage bins. At this time, all three garbage bins were observed to be full of garbage and the lids were open. During observations and interview on 04/21/23 at 8:45 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM)-J stated, One of the bins I think is for recyclables, and the other two bins are for garbage. At this time, observation was made of the area around the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility did not maintain a system of surveillance, tracking and trending of infections and identifying possible communicable diseases or infections before they can spread to other persons in the facility potentially affecting 81 of 81 residents. ~ The facility had an Infection Control Program that did not accurately track, trend or analyze the infection rate and data to help decrease the rates, numbers and spread of infections in the facility. Line lists did not accurately identify infections in the facility. There was no system of surveillance including maps to identify monthly infections on units. There were no trending analysis of Community Acquired Infections or Healthcare Associated Infections (HAI's). The Infection Preventionist was unaware of how to use the computer based Infection Prevention program…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was provided for one of eighteen residents (Resident (R) 19) of 39 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure staff were seated while assisting residents during meals and refrained from calling residents feeders during dining services. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Dignity, revised 07/21/22, indicated The facility shall promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality .Staff shall carry out activities in a manner which assists the resident to maintain and enhance his/her self-esteem and self-worth .Maintaining a resident's dignity should include but is not limited to the following .promoting resident independence and dignity while dining, such as avoiding: staff standing over residents while assisting them to eat; staff interacting/conversing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure allegations of mistreatment that resulted in serious bodily injury were reported to the State Agency for 1 (R65) of 2 reportable incidents reviewed. R65 was transferred from the wheelchair to the bed with the assistance of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-X. R65's Care Plan indicated R65 transferred with the use of a sit-to-stand lift. CNA-X did not follow R65's Care Plan and R65 sustained a fractured right tibia and fibula. This incident was not reported to the State Agency. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure entitled Abuse Policy undated, states: Definitions: . Neglect is defined . as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Neglect occurs when the facility is aware of, or should have been aware of, goods or services that a resident(s) requires but the facility failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I screens were resubmitted to the State mental health authority after a 30-day exemption had expired and the resident was still in the facility for 1 (R73) of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR compliance. R73 was admitted [DATE]. A PASARR Level I was completed with a 30-day exemption on [DATE]. On [DATE] with R73 was still a resident at the facility, no PASARR Level I was resubmitted. Findings include: R73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R73 has a diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder. R73 has an order for Buspar and Depakote for her mental disorders. A Level I PASARR was submitted to the State screening agency on [DATE] indicating R73 had a serious mental illness. Section B: short term exemptions was completed indicating R73 had an exemption from a Level II screen due to a hospital discharge and an expected stay at the facility for less than 30 days. On [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility did not revise resident care plans for 2 (R65, R235) of 18 resident care plans reviewed and did not ensure care conferences were held quarterly to get resident input in their care. *R235's care plan was not revised to include showers two times a week as discussed with facility and R235's guardian. R235 did not receive a shower two times a week. *R65 did not have care conferences to ensure participation in the development of a care plan on a quarterly basis. Findings include: 1.) R235 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include spastic diplegic cerebral palsy, acute kidney failure, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, expressive language disorder, nontraumatic ischemic infarction of muscle, left ankle, and foot, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, peripheral vascular disease, muscle weakness, and cognitive communication deficit. R235's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R235 had severely impaired cognition with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R70) of 5 residents drug regime was free from unnecessary medications *R70 was admitted to the facility with an order for Eliquis twice daily. The facility did not implement a care plan or orders to monitor for any adverse side effects that could result from taking an anticoagulant. Findings include: The facility policy entitled Unnecessary Drugs (General) initiated on 4/1/2008 states: Each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug used: . Without adequate monitoring . In the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued R70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, left foot toes amputated, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) with diabetic neuropathy, atherosclerosis of bilateral legs, peripheral vascular disease, vascular dementia, chronic pain syndrome, major depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure Residents who receive anti-psychotic drugs were assessed for the potential side effects of the anti-psychotic drugs for 1 (R82) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. R82 did not have an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment completed on 3/22/24 when prescribed anti-psychotic medication. Findings include: On 4/22/24 the facility's policy titled, Aims Side Effect Monitoring dated 1/24 was reviewed and read: The examination will be performed either at the time of resident's admission or when the medications are initially prescribed. R82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Anxiety, Depression and Traumatic Brain Injury. On 4/23/24 R82's current physicians orders were reviewed and read: Seroquel 200 milligram (mg) at bedtime with a start date of 3/22/24 for Anxiety. Seroquel is an anti-psychotic medication. On 4/23/24 R82's medical record was reviewed and no Abnormal Involuntary Movement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, staff and resident interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable and environment throughout the building. The facility was without adequate linens to ensure resident needs were met, including washcloths, hand towels, and hospital gowns. A total of 19 residents were reviewed in the sample. Findings include: On 03/12/24 at 1:30 PM Laundry Aide (LA1) was observed stocking the linen closet on the [NAME] Unit. There were no washcloths and no hospital gowns in the closet prior to LA1 stacking the closet. LA1 stocked the closet with 10 wash cloths and eight hospital gowns and stated, We don't have enough (washcloths or hospital gowns). The residents and staff come down (to the laundry room) and ask for them .especially washcloths and we just don't have enough of them. This is all there is. During an interview with Resident (R) 4 on 03/13/24 at 9:15 AM, she stated, They (the facility) did not have any gowns last night. I had to lay here with no gown (because they were out of them). They run out of supplies a lot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff prevented accident hazards for 3 (R6, R17, R18) of 3 residents reviewed. after a resident fell out of bed during care, a resident fell during an improper transfer and that two staff transferred a resident when using a mechanical lift for three (Residents (R)6, R17, and R18) out of three residents reviewed for accidents hazards. Findings include: 1. Review of R6's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's, lack of coordination, and repeated falls. Review of R6's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/13/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), score of 13 out of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. Further review revealed the resident required partial/moderate assistance with bed mobility. Review of R6's Care Plan,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to assess the effectiveness of Tylenol for complaints of pain for one of three residents (Resident (R)5. Findings include: Review of R5's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] at 4:36 PM with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, difficulty in walking, aphasia, lack of coordination and muscle weakness. Review of R5's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/27/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), was unable to be completed due to the resident was rarely understood. Further review revealed the resident required substantial assistance with bed mobility and dependent on staff for transfers. Review of R5's Care Plan, located under the Care Plan tab of the EMR and dated 01/26/24, revealed The resident has pain and receiving as needed (PRN) pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen was maintained in an orderly manner to prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that kitchen staff followed proper sanitation procedures to help prevent an outbreak of foodborne illness. This has the potential to affect 83 out of 85 residents in the facility who received an oral diet. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen with the Interim Dietary Manager (IDM) on 10/11/23, between 10:00 AM-12:00 PM, the following concerns were observed: 1. The steam table had five wells with brown water in all five of them. Also, in two of the five wells, there was black unknown burnt substance caked on the bottom of the wells. 2. On top of the steam table, steam table pans were observed to have dried food scattered throughout, and a dark tacky unknown substance was noted around the outside of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of employee records, the facility did not ensure CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)/Med Tech-F was qualified to pass medications to residents residing in the Facility after 12/22/22. This has the potential to affect all 92 residents residing in the Facility. CNA/Med Tech-F has a current CNA certificate, was enrolled at [name of] University for diploma in practical nursing and completed pharmalogical for nurses with lab course during the spring semester 2021. CNA/Med Tech-F graduated from [name of] University on 12/22/21. As of 1/25/23, CNA/Med Tech-F did not obtain her LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) license and has not applied to take the take the med aide challenge exam. Findings include: On 1/23/23, Surveyor randomly selected 8 facility employees including CNA/Med Tech-F to review their personnel records for background information and CNA certifications. On 1/23/23 at 11:45 a.m., Surveyor provided Administrator-A with the names of the employees including CNA/Med Tech-F, and requested their background information and CNA certifications. On 1/26/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the Facility did not have bath towels and wash cloths available for personal cares. Multiple observations of the 4 of 4 linen rooms on 1/26/23 revealed no bath towels or wash cloths. The 4 linen rooms were located on the Rehab unit, West, North and South units. The Facility has a census of 92 Residents. Findings include: On 1/26/23 at 8:41 a.m. Surveyor asked CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-FF if there are times when Residents don't receive their scheduled showers. CNA-FF replied yes. Surveyor inquired why. CNA-FF informed Surveyor because there are no towels. Surveyor inquired how often this occurs. CNA-FF indicated quite frequently. On 1/26/23 at 8:47 a.m. Surveyor checked the clean linen room on the rehab unit. Surveyor did not observe any wash cloths or any towels. On 1/26/23 at 8:50 a.m. Surveyor checked the clean linen room on the west unit. Surveyor did not observe any wash cloths or towels in this clean linen room. Surveyor did observe a cart in the room but there wasn't any wash cloths or towels on the cart. On 1/26/23 at 8:52 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-02 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the Facility did not ensure 1 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-E of 5 randomly selected CNAs had a performance review at least once every 12 months. This deficient practice has the potential to affect those residents whom CNA-E provides care to. A performance review was not completed for CNA-E in 2022. Findings include: On 1/23/23 Surveyor randomly selected 5 CNA's (CNA/Med Tech-F, CNA-E, CNA-U, CNA-V, & CNA-W) from the Facility's employee list to review for performance reviews. On 1/23/23 at 11:45 a.m. Surveyor provided CNA/Med Tech-F, CNA-E, CNA-U, CNA-V & CNA-W's names to Administrator-A and requested their performance reviews. On 1/26/23 at 9:52 a.m. Surveyor reviewed the performance reviews for CNA/Med Tech-F, CNA-E, CNA-U, CNA-V & CNA-W. CNA-E was hired on 1/22/19. A performance review was completed on 1/16/21. Surveyor was not able to locate a performance review in 2022 for CNA-E. On 1/26/23 at 10:48 a.m. Surveyor informed HR (Human Resources)-G the last performance review provided to Surveyor for CNA-E is dated 1/16/21 and asked if one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not ensure medications were disposed of when expired, stored properly, dated when opened in 2 of 2 medication carts and 1 of 2 medication rooms affecting R72, R12, R41, R16, R59, and new admissions to the rehab unit. 1 (R84) of 1 Resident's hospital orders were not transcribed correctly. * R72 glargine insulin vial & R12's lantus pen was not disposed of when expired. * A med cup not labeled containing 10+ white tablets was observed in the South medication cart. * R41's albuteral inhaler was not dated when opened. * R16's albuteral inhaler was not disposed of when expired. * R59's bag of 0.9% sodium chloride 100 ml (milliliters) was expired in the refrigerator located in the Rehab unit medication room. * 2 vials of stock tuberculin were observed open & used but not dated in the refrigerator located in the Rehab unit medication room. * R84's Vitamin B 12 hospital order dated [DATE] was not transcribed correctly. Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a safe, sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 22 of 23 residents on the [NAME] Unit, 2 (R34 and R84) of 7 residents receiving medication, and 4 (R84, R387, R388, and R389) of 4 residents having blood sugars taken. Observations were made of residents on the [NAME] Unit during mealtimes. No hand hygiene was offered to the residents prior to receiving their meals. * An observation was made during medication pass of R34's Benztropine 0.5 mg tablet and 1 mg tablet being in the nurse's bare hand and then placed into the medication cup. R84's Spironolactone 25 mg tablet was on the medication cart; the med tech with gloved hand picked the medication up from the medication cart, placed it in the med cup and then administered this medication to R84. * Observations were made of residents getting their blood sugars checked and the glucometers were not cleaned between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon observation and interview, the Facility did not ensure Facility equipment was maintained in proper working order. The laundry is located in a smoke compartment which includes the main entrance area/common area, 1 of 2 dining rooms (east dining room), 2 resident rooms and the kitchen. This deficient practice has the potential to affect those residents who may be in the entrance common area, who may be in the east dining room and the residents residing in the 2 resident rooms. * Surveyor observed 4 of 4 dryers in the laundry room had an accumulation of lint on the wires above the screen and under & in the back of the lint screen which is a potential fire hazard. Findings include: On 1/26/23 at 12:40 p.m. Surveyor toured the laundry room with Laundry-EE. While on the dryer side of the laundry room Surveyor asked Laundry-EE how often the lint is cleaned from the dryers. Surveyor observed there are 4 working commercial dryers. Laundry-EE informed Surveyor she checks the dryers when she comes in and cleans the lint at the end of the day. Laundry-EE explained she leaves at 3:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R87) of 7 residents reviewed for allegations of abuse reported the allegation to the state agency. On [DATE], R87 had a change in condition, became unresponsive and needed CPR. R87's husband threatened to give R87 antianxiety medications from home if the facility wasn't going to get an order for it. The facility suspected R87's husband may have given R87 some medication prior to R87 becoming unresponsive. The facility called the police to report the suspicion of a crime but did not notify the state agency. Findings include: The facility abuse policy (not dated) documents, Any allegation of abuse or any incident that results in serious bodily injury will be reported to the required regulatory agencies immediately, but not more than two hours of the allegation of abuse. Any incident that does not involve abuse and does not result in serious bodily injury shall be reported within 24 hours. R87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not investigate 2 (R37 & R87) of 7 allegations of mistreatment. * The Facility did not investigate R37's missing gold ring. * The Facility did not investigate an incident involving R87 which occurred on [DATE] that caused the Facility to notify the police. Findings include: The Abuse Policy which is not dated under section IV Internal Reporting Requirements and Identification of Allegations includes documentation of All residents, visitors, volunteers, family members or others are encouraged to report their concerns or suspected incidents of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property to the administrator or an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to the administrator or the designated individual in the administrator's absence. Such reports may be made without fear of retaliation. Anonymous reports will also be thoroughly investigated. Reports will be documented and a record kept of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, 3 (R17, R10, R64, R17) of 5 residents reviewed did not receive required assistance with Activities of Daily Living. * On 12/17/22, R17 was hospitalized with diagnoses of COVID and submandibular abscess. The facility could not provide documentation to ensure R17 was getting proper oral hygiene in accordance with R17's plan of care. * R10 did not receive assistance with bathing in accordance with facility protocol. * R64 did not receive assistance with nail care in accordance with facility protocol. Findings include: 1. R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hearing loss and dementia. R17's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment with a reference date of 4/8/22 does not indicate R17's dental status. The MDS assessment indicates R17 requires extensive assistance of one person for personal hygiene, which includes brushing teeth/oral care. This MDS indicates R17 scored an 8 on the Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, that facility did not always ensure that they obtained accurate weights to be able to comprehensively assess 1 out of 9 (R80) residents who were at nutritional risk for weight loss. * A review of R80's weights using multiple methods of obtaining weights reflected R80 had various weight losses and weight gains from one week to another. On 10/30/22 R80 weighed 210 pounds and on 10/30/22 the same date was noted to also weight 269 pounds. R80's weight on 10/30/22 was 269 pounds. On 11/9/22, R80's weight 241.6. On 12/1/22, R80's weight was 230.4 pounds etc. The dietician disputed the weight value with no further follow up. Staff were not consistently using one method to weigh R80. R80's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) [NAME] did not indicated in which manner R80 should be weighed. This is evidenced by: Policy Review: Weight Monitoring Program, last revised 9/1/22. Each resident's weight will be monitored consistently and closely by the interdisciplinary team. All…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the Facility did not ensure the physician acted upon recommendations by the pharmacist for 1 (R53) of 2 Residents reviewed with pharmacy recommendations. On 12/20/22 Consultant Pharmacist-Z recommended clarification of indications for use for R53's Risperidone 0.25 mg (milligrams) with directions to give one tablet by mouth one time a day for sleep. This recommendations was not acted upon by the physician and on 1/17/23 Consultant Pharmacist-Z drug regimen report recommended the same clarification. Findings include: The Documentation and Communication of Consultant Pharmacist Recommendations policy and procedure from 2006 American Society of Consultant Pharmacists and Med-Pass, Inc. (Revised January 2018) under procedures includes documentation of B.) Comments and recommendations concerning medication therapy are communicated in a timely fashion. The timing of these recommendations should enable a response prior to the next medication regimen review. In the event of a problem requiring immediate attention of the prescriber, the responsible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility did not ensure that 1 (R53) of 5 Residents were free from unnecessary drugs. * R53 received Risperidone (Risperdal) 0.25 mg (milligrams) once daily without indications for use. Finding include: The Psychotropic Drug Use policy which is not dated under Objective documents All residents have the right to be free from unnecessary medications imposed for the purposes of discipline or convenience and not required to treat medical symptoms. Based on a comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility will assure the residents are not given psychotropic medications unless psychotropic drug therapy is necessary to treat a specific condition and residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions and behavioral interventions unless clinically contraindicated, with the ultimate goal to discontinue these drugs as appropriate. Under Policy documents Psychotropic use: Antipsychotic drugs will be used only after identifying and assessing possible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not ensure there was a medication error rate below 5 percent. There were 2 medication errors in 32 opportunities which resulted in a medication error rate of 6.25%. Medication errors were identified for R34 & R84. * R34 received the incorrect dose of Sertraline HCL. R34 received 100 mg (milligrams). The physician orders are for 125 mg of Sertraline. * R84 received the incorrect dose of Vitamin B-12. R84 received 200 mcg (micrograms). R84 should have received 500 mcg. Findings include: 1. On 1/23/23 at 8:40 a.m. Surveyor observed RN (Registered Nurse)-O pour 30 ml (milliliters) of Pro Stat into a medication cup for R34 and cleanse her hands. RN-O then prepare R34's medication which consisted of Tylenol 325 mg two tablets, EC (enteric coated) Aspirin 325 mg one tablet, Benztropine Mesylate 0.5 mg one tablet, Benztropine Mesylate 1 mg one tablet, Multivitamin with minerals one tablet, Divalproex Sodium 500 mg two tablets, Duloxetine 60 mg one capsule, Furosemide 40 mg one tablet, Gabapentin 100 mg three capsules,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$33,989 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $33,989 — penalty dated 2024-04-29
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-31 for 5 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVINA HEALTHCARE — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.9+1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BRANDMAN, AKIVAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 11/01/2018
BRANDMAN, YAAKOVIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 11/01/2018
REBEL, IGORIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 11/01/2018
TOPPER, CECILIAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST16%since 07/09/2024
BRANDMAN, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2018
TOPPER, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/10/2025

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$711K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 7%Other / private 14%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $711K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$327per resident / day
operating cost
$9,947per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$336per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525179. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next