Devon Gables Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 312 beds and averages 183.3 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 129 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.76 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and review of facility protocol and policies the facility failed to ensure one resident (#5) was free from accidents during a hoyer transfer. The deficient practice could lead to major injury. Findings include: Resident #5 was admitted originally on October 5, 2020 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included epilepsy, transient cerebral ischemic attach, other mechanical complication of internal fixation device of right femur, bipolar disorder, acute respiratory failure, non-ST elevation myocardial infraction. A significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 02. indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed the resident was dependent and needed the assistance of 2 or more helpers to complete any activities dealing with transfers. A care plan created May 26, 2025 revealed an approach that the resident is a hoyer lift…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to protect the rights of one three resident's (#20) to be free from abuse by another resident. The deficient practice had the potential to result in further abuse of residents.-Regarding Resident # 35:Resident #35 (alleged perpetrator) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, altered mental status, and brief psychotic disorder.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated February 11, 2026, revealed Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition, no behaviors of wandering were exhibited during the assessment period.A psychosocial well-being care plan, initiated on November 18, 2025, revealed the following problem area: Adjustment to living in a secure environment related to dementia, memory impairment and history of attempts to elope and wandering. The goal was for the resident to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure three residents (#22, #26 and #27) were not abused by other residents (#125, #50 and#145). The deficient practice could lead to physical and psychosocial harm of residents.-Regarding Resident #22 (alleged victim):Resident #22 was re-admitted to the facility September 20, 2023, with diagnoses that included dysphagia, catatonic schizophrenia, cerebral infarction, hyperlipidemia, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder with severe psychotic symptoms, and restlessness and agitation. A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #22 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment.A care plan dated November 8, 2017, revealed Resident #22 has socially inappropriate / disruptive behavioral symptoms as evidenced by making verbal unwanted statements and reaching…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the clinical record, staff interviews, facility policy and facility records, the facility failed to ensure that 1 resident (#33) was safe. Failure to ensure the resident's safety could lead to resident harm. Findings include: Resident #33 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, and macular degeneration. A hospital history and physical dated October 7, 2023 included that this resident has chronic dementia and was unable to recall events of what happened. An admission assessment dated [DATE] included that this resident was attentive, disoriented, memory impaired, and had disorganized thinking. A care plan dated October 18, 2023 included that this resident is oriented to self and that this resident had Cognitive loss/dementia or alteration in thought processes related to diagnosis of dementia with behavioral disturbance as evidenced by impaired decision making, short and/or long term memory loss, and/or neurological symptoms. A treatment consent dated October 19, 2023…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, facility documents and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that three residents (#33, #24, #11) were not abused. This deficient practice could result in further incidents of abuse. Findings include: Regarding resident #33 and resident #24 A facility reported incident was made on May 14, 2024. This report included Staff responded to visitor calling for help, stating those two men are fighting. She states that she heard raised voices coming from the room across the hallway. She looked across the hallway and observed (residents #24 and #33) in the bathroom doorway and appeared to be fighting. A 5 day report dated May 17, 2024 included Per staff report (resident #24) had been having increased behavioral episodes the prior day and night. He was seen packing his belongings, pushing at doors and very difficult for the staff to re-direct. Per night staff he had slept very little the previous night. (resident #33 can be very territorial about his room and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, facility records and facility policy the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#24) is free from preventable falls. This deficient practice could result in increased morbidity and mortality. Findings include: Resident #24 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, Mood disorder due to known physiological condition with depressive features and Vascular dementia A 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] included that this resident was unable to answer questions for cognition and that the resident had a fall prior to entry. A care plan dated December 19, 2022 included this resident is at risk for falls related to diagnosis and history of falls. A progress note dated July 27, 2023 included Upon entering pts room he was noted laying on back in front of closet. pt stated I fell. Body check done, no new injuries. Denies hitting head, no red, raised or open areas.Neuro check done due to unwitness fall. Passive ROM to upper and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and review of policy, the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable homelike environment related to ambient temperatures. The facility census was 227. The deficient practice may result in uncomfortable ambient temperature levels. Findings include: During a survey of the facility conducted 07/11/23 through 07/14/23, temperature findings were identified in common areas to include the following: -On 07/11/23 at 09:43 AM the fire door outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 83.5 degrees Fahrenheit (F). -On 07/12/23 at 09:55 AM the Saguaro Room curtain temperatures ranged from 82-83 degrees F. -On 07/12/23 at 09:56 AM the air conditioner units in the hall by room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 82 degrees F. An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] was conducted on 07/13/23 at 11:05 AM. Two fans were observed to be running in the room. The temperature of the room ranged from 78-80 degrees F. The two residents of the room stated that they were comfortable at that time, but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-04-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY -Resident #109 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included a tear of the medial meniscus, age related physical debility, hemiplegia and hemiparesis of the left side. Review of the clinical record revealed an order dated January 7, 2019 for restorative nursing (RNA) 3 to 5 times per week to prevent a decrease in range of motion. A care plan dated March 12, 2019 revealed that the resident is receiving restorative nursing services to maintain functional ability. The goal is that the resident will maintain joint function. Approaches including AROM (Active Range of Motion) to the lower extremity as tolerated 3- 5 times per week. Review of the care plan dated July 17, 2020 revealed the resident is at high risk for falls related to limited function. Approaches included implementing an exercise program that targeted strength, gait and balance. The significant change in status minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a score of 15 on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) indicating the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that medications were dated according to the standard of practice, and failed to ensure that expired medications were not available for administration. The deficient practice could result in expired medications being administered to residents. Findings include: -An observation was conducted on April 28, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. of the medication cart on hall 209-228, sub-acute unit. An insulin box with a pharmacy label Aspart Insulin contained two opened vials of insulin inside. The first vial with a maroon top was labeled Insulin Lispro, and the second vial with a silver top was labeled insulin Aspart. The insulin vials had no resident's name, or open dates. An interview was conducted on April 28, 2022 at 1:33 p.m. with an RN (Registered Nurse/staff #204). Staff #204 stated each insulin is usually in an individual box with the resident's name and opened date. Staff #204 looked at the insulin vials and stated the maroon top is insulin Lispro, and the silver top is insulin Aspart.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-04-29 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, policy review and the Form Instructions for the Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN), the facility failed to provide evidence that the Skilled Nursing Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) was issued to one (#108) of three sampled residents. The deficient practice could result in residents not being informed of their potential liability for payment. Findings include: Resident #108 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, altered mental status, anxiety disorder and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the admission Record face sheet revealed the resident was their own responsible party. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Review of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) revealed the last day of coverage was on March 31, 2022.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-04-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#43) with a diagnosis of a serious mental illness was referred to the appropriate State-designated mental health or intellectual disability authority for review once the resident's stay exceeded 30 days. The sample size was 3. The deficient practice could result in necessary specialized services not being provided for residents that need it. Findings include: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance; Bipolar disorder, current episode hypomanic; Other personality and behavioral disorders due to known physiological condition. Review of a Level I PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) signed November 28, 2020 revealed the resident was for convalescent care and required 30 days or less nursing facility services. The section for Identification of Potential Mental Illness did not have anything…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATIED ASSOCIATES — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ