Prairie Village Healthcare Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 56.2 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 70 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 31% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain a urine sample timely and properly insert a catheter for 1 of 5 residents (R13) reviewed for urinary tract infections in the sample of 27. This failure resulted in the untimely collection of a urine specimen, with collection not occurring until 4 days after the order was received. During this time R13 suffered increasing symptoms with ultimately a malposition foley catheter being inserted into R13's urethra with a partially inflated balloon, despite the order given being for a straight catheter. R13 developed urosepsis and septic shock with hospital stay from [DATE]-[DATE] with ICU care for 7 days and ultimately death on [DATE] caused by sepsis and UTI.The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE] when R13 was transferred to local hospital due to change in condition in which the facility had not obtained a urine sample. R13's labs at the local hospital indicated R13 had a UTI. The facility inserted a foley catheter improperly causing obstruction,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent falls, investigate falls thoroughly to determine a root cause analysis and implement progressive interventions to prevent falls, provide safe transfers, and ensure transfer equipment is in good condition for 5 of 8 residents (R9, R10, R14, R17, R27) reviewed for falls and transfers in the sample of 31. This failure resulted in R17 falling 5 times,sustaining bumps to the back of her head, and another fall resulting in R17 going to the emergency room and receiving 8 staples to the back of her head. Finding include: 1.R17's Face Sheet, undated, documents R17 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses of cerebral infarction, dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety, personal history of (healed) traumatic fracture of right tibia and left femur. R17's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R17 is severely cognitively intact, has inattention and disorganized thinking that fluctuates and changes in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to don Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) and Contact Isolation, and to do hand hygiene and glove changes when necessary for 4 of 4 residents (R9, R12, R15, R21) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 30.The findings include: 1. R9's Face Sheet, dated 4/6/26, documents R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].R9's Physician Order, dated 4/17/26, documents Strict Isolation Type: Contact: Wound- Abdominal Wall Cellulitis, follow Contact Isolation.On 4/7/26 at 8:55 AM, a Contact Isolation sign was seen on R9's door with Personal Protectant Equipment (PPE) hanging on the door. Both V14, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Wound Nurse, and V7, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), entered R9's room for wound care with no PPE on. Before, during, or after wound care, there was no PPE worn except for gloves.2. R12's Face Sheet, dated 4/6/26, documents R12 was originally admitted to the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to properly treat pressure sores, including following physician orders, for 1 of 4 residents (R9) reviewed for care of a pressure ulcer in the sample of 30. The findings include:1. R9's Face Sheet, dated 4/6/26, documents R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].R9's Care Plan, dated 3/25/26, documents R9 has alteration in skin integrity as evidence by pressure ulcer, wound healing may be hindered due to resident noncompliance with being turned every two hours, and offloading her buttocks, resident prefers to lay on her back. Interventions: Encourage/assist with turning/repositioning every two hours and PRN (as needed), keep clean and dry as possible, minimize skin exposure to moisture, provide/assist with continence care as needed, keep linens dry and wrinkle free to prevent further pressure forces, maintain head of bed at/or below 30 degrees or at lowest degree of elevation consistent with the resident's medical condition to prevent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to replace a broken c-pap mask timely for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for respiratory therapy in the sample of 30. Findings include:1 R1's progress notes dated 2/2/2026 at 2;57PM documents Resident's c-pap mask is broke, and medical supply company is bringing a new one tomorrow 2/3. Oxygen on at 3L (liters)/NC. (nasal cannula)R1's progress notes dated 2/1 2026 at 11:37PM documents Resident complained of Shortness Of Breath (SOB) at bedtime (hs). Nebulization treatment administered per order. Post-treatment SpO2 improved to 92%. Noted mask is broken and requires replacement; Resident continues to be monitored for further respiratory distress, on continuous O2 therapy via at 4L via nasal cannulaR1's undated face sheet documents a diagnosis in part of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Chronic Respiratory failure wit hypoxia, Dependent on supplemental oxygen, and obstructive sleep apnea. R1's physician orders dated 1/31/2026 documents 02 (oxygen) at 3L (liters) per nasal cannula if refuses c-pap or if not available…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to administer an antibiotic to a resident with a diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and failed to follow physician orders to administer medications for 2 of 5 residents (R21, R22) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 30.The findings include:1. R21's Face Sheet, dated 4/7/26, documents R21 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE].R21's Care Plan, dated 4/6/26, documents R21 requires a suprapubic catheter related to urinary retention. Interventions: Enhanced barrier precautions, keep catheter system a closed system as much as possible, document urinary output every shift, record the amount, type, color, odor, observe for leakage. R21's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R21 is cognitively intact and is dependent on staff for toileting. R21 has urinary catheter in place and is frequently incontinent of bowel.R21's Hospital Record, dated 4/10/26, documents in part Patient presented to the ER…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-24 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a residents' foot was free of insects for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for foot health. Findings include: R2's Undated Face Sheet, documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. No diagnosis of wounds or bugs on R2's skin, including maggots. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents she is alert. R2's Care Plan, dated 10/20/2025 documents R2 has an open lesion on the foot which appears to be small crack in the skin between her 4th and 5th toe on her right foot. Goal: lesion will show improvement by decreasing in size and showing no signs and symptoms of infection by next review date. Approaches: administer dressing/treatment to address/stabilize specific wound characteristics as ordered by the physician, encourage appropriate footwear is worn at all times and encourage R2 not to walk/propel chair around barefoot or in just socks/stockings, ensure footwear for proper sizing, ensure shoes are in good condition,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for 1 (R2) of 3 sampled residents in review of complete and accurate medical records. Findings include: R2's Undated Face Sheet, documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. No diagnosis of wounds or bugs on R2's skin, including maggots. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents she is alert. On 10/24/2025 at 3:33 PM V5, LPN stated V13, Facility Podiatrist entered the facility early in the morning on 10/20/2025 and assessed residents, including R2. R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 10/23/2025 no documentation of V13's progress notes. On 10/23/2025 at 2:20 PM V1, Administrator stated V13, Facility Podiatrist doesn't share/send his progress notes with the facility, and he never has. On 10/24/2025 at 11:54 V13, R2's Podiatrist stated he is the facility podiatrist, and sees over 25 plus patients at the facility approximately four times a year. V13 stated his office sends the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for twice-daily pulse oximetry checks for 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 4. Findings include: 1. R2's undated face sheet documented he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following diagnoses polyneuropathy, diabetes, end stage renal disease, dependence on dialysis, right below the knee amputation, and obstructive sleep apnea. R2's minimal data set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented he is cognitively intact. R2's care plan updated 6/5/25 documented wound care interventions, depression, peripheral neuropathy, dialysis, pain, nutrition, and diabetes. There was no problem including oxygen saturation monitoring noted in his care plan. R2's physician order dated 4/21/25 documented Oxygen: Oxygen saturation (pulse oximetry) (SPO2) twice daily. R2's oxygen saturation recordings reviewed in the electronic medical record (EMR) and documented daily except for 6/5/25 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to identify a stage 2 pressure ulcer on the upper intergluteal cleft in a timely manner for 1 of 3 (R2) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of 4. Findings include: R2's undated face sheet documented he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following diagnoses polyneuropathy, diabetes, end stage renal disease, dependence on dialysis, and right below the knee amputation. On 6/25/25 at 9:40 am during skin check of R2's buttocks area with V3 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/ wound nurse, V5 (LPN/wound nurse) and surveyor, a new pressure wound to upper intergluteal cleft was found measuring 0.5 cm x 0.2 cm which V3 acknowledged was a stage 2 pressure wound. V3 and V5 stated they were unaware of a pressure wound to this area. On 6/25/25 at 10:30 am, V3 stated she had received orders from V15 (Facility Physician) and was bringing in wound care supplies to provide wound care to the new upper intergluteal pressure wound. R2's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 8 consecutive hours of Registered Nurse (RN) Coverage. This failure has the potential to affect all 48 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Schedule, dated 3/4/24 - 3/17/24, fails to document a Registered Nurse working for 8 consecutive hours on 3/5/24, 3/6/24, 3/7/24, 3/8/24, 3/10/24, 3/11/24, 3/13/24, 3/16/24 and 3/17/24. On 4/10/24 at 1:30 PM, V1, Administrator, stated, (V14), (previous Director of Nurses, (DON) ended her employment on 1/18/24. (V15), (Interim DON) worked from 1/18/24 until 3/4/24 as the sitting DON. Then (V15) just quit and that is when I lost my RN coverage. The Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, dated 4/8/24, documents that 48 residents reside in the facility.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to cleanse a multi-use blood glucose machine completely to insure disinfection for 7 of 16 residents (R4, R12, R17, R23 R38, R45, R47) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 29. Findings include: On 4/8/24 at 11:03 AM, V4, Licensed Practical Nurse, entered (R38's) room to obtain a blood glucose level. V4 got the level of 158 and exited the room. V4 took the blood glucose machine to her medication cart and laid it on a clean tissue. V4 obtained a Microdot Bleach wipe and gently wrapped the machine up and placed it on top of her medication cart. V4 set a timer for 3 minutes. V4 failed to rub the entire machine with the Microdot cloth. On 4/9/24 at 11:00 AM, V1, Administrator stated that the blood glucose machine should be cleansed before wrapping it up. The facility provided list documenting who gets blood glucose monitoring, dated 4/10/24, documents that R4, R12, R17, R23, R38, R45 and R47 all use this multi-use glucose monitor. The Microdot Bleach Wipe container ,documents, Disinfection: 5. Apply…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$131,684 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

• $131,684 — penalty dated 2026-04-23
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-05-21 for 8 days
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-13 for 26 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATIED ASSOCIATES — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $444K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL