Foothills Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 149 beds and averages 124.4 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, facility records and facility policy the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#1) out of 3 sampled is free from preventable falls. This deficient practice could result in resident injury and mortality. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including MS (multiple sclerosis) chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right dominant side, chronic pain, muscle weakness, wedge compression fractures, fracture of right tibia, and fracture right fibula. A review of the MDS (minimum data set) dated November 13, 2024 revealed a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact. A review of the resident's care plan revealed that a focus area noting that the resident required the use of a mechanical lift device (Hoyer lift) and a 2-person assist was initiated on December 5, 2023. A review of the progress notes revealed that on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#62) did not sustain a preventable accident. The sample size was 24. The deficient practice increased the risk for pain, injury and/or hospitalization. Findings include: Resident #62 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebellar stroke syndrome, diverticulosis of the large intestine and a persistent vegetative state. The activities of daily living (ADL) care plan dated 03/11/21 related to bathing, grooming, hygiene, toileting and bed mobility had a goal for the resident not to decline in ADL function. Interventions included 2 staff assistance for bed mobility. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was not assessed and she required total assistance of one to two persons for most ADLs. A nursing progress note dated 01/15/23 at 3:30 a.m. included that the nurse had been called to the resident's room where she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policy and procedures the facility failed to ensure their policy was implemented and followed related to abuse/neglect and abuse investigation for Residents #19, #56, #139, #144, #149, #167 and #174. The universe was 25. The deficient practice could result in failure to recognize, respond and take appropriate action to prevent residents from continued abuse and neglect and risk for ongoing harm, exploitation and serious adverse outcomes.Findings include:Regarding Resident #167 -Resident #167 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included persistent vegetative state, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, and Crohn's disease. Review of the admission MDS, dated [DATE], did not assess Resident #167's cognitive status. The same MDS also noted that Resident #167's functional status for bathing was total dependence and required 1-person…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse for 5 of 25 sampled residents (#19, #174, #149, #139 and #56) were thoroughly investigated. The deficient practice could result in failure to recognize, respond and take appropriate action to prevent residents from continued abuse and neglect and risk for ongoing harm, exploitation and serious adverse outcomes.Findings include: -Resident #174 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on February 14, 2024 with diagnosis including acute/ chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia, muscle weakness, Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, morbid obesity, transient ischemic attack, hypoventilation syndrome, atrial fibrillation, chronic systolic congestive heart failure, aneurysm of other specified arteries, anemia, sick sinus syndrome, dyspnea, asthma, gastroparesis, osteoarthritis-right knee and shoulder, chronic kidney…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-28 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was provided to resident/representative for 3 of 25 sampled residents (#168, #171 and #175). The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving the necessary care and services to meet their assessed needs upon admission.Findings include:-Resident #168 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute posthemorrhagic anemia, unsteadiness of feet, difficulty of walking, seizures, and COPD (chronic pulmonary obstructive disease). The nursing note dated October 23, 2023 included that resident arrived from the hospital, was alert and oriented x 4 and was able to make needs known. Per the documentation all consents were signed by the resident. The baseline care plan dated October 23, 2023 included that the meeting was attended by the social services and nutrition staff; and did not indicate the resident or resident representative was part of the creation of the baseline care plan.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that food was labeled and stored in accordance with professional food safety standards. The deficient practices could result in food-borne illnesses.Findings include:An initial kitchen observation was conducted on March 24, 2026 at 8:20 AM with the Dietary Manager (staff #108). There was an open 2-pound package of Hormel deli smoked ham inside a Ziploc bag with no open date on either the original packaging or the Ziploc bag; and, a box of mushrooms labeled with a production date of March 9, 2026 was found in the kitchen refrigerator. The mushrooms in the box were dark brown in color and were 'mushy'. The Dietary Manager stated that the mushrooms were browning and should be going in the trash. A observation of the kitchen freezer was also conducted with the dietary manager (staff #108) on March 24, 2026 at 8:30 AM. In the freezer was an open 64-ounce bag of Frozen Harvest mixed vegetables with no open or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the clinical record review, observations, interviews, facility documentation, and policy, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed regarding Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 3 residents (#82, #42, and #10) The universe is 25. This deficient practice can result in contamination and spread of infection.Findings include:-Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of MRSA (Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus) infection, rash and other nonspecific skin eruption, Zoster without complications and disorder of skin and subcutaneous tissue. The care plan dated March 2, 2026 included resident was at risk for dehydration related to MRSA bacteremia. The nursing note dated March 21, 2026 revealed admission diagnosis of MRSA infection. The wound note dated March 24, 3036 included that the resident had a wound to the breast related to acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. The facesheet in the clinical record that resident was on EBP related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, interviews, and review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#120) advance directive was accurately documented and implemented in accordance with the resident's expressed preference. The universe was 25. The deficient practice could result in the resident's wishes and preferences related to life-sustaining treatment not followed and honored. Findings include:Resident #120 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged on [DATE], and returned to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Morbidity, and Acute Kidney failure, unspecified.Review of the Change in Condition (CIC) Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #120 completed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored a 13 which indicated he was cognitively intact.Review of Resident #120's Care Plan revealed it was last reviewed/revised on [DATE]. The Care Plan identified Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and a review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure a safe homelike environment for residents. This deficient practice had the potential for resident injury and psychosocial harm. Findings include:Resident #39 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including anemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitis, and depressionThe 5-day MDS (minimum data set) with an assessment reference date of December 29, 2025 revealed that the resident had a BIMS score of 15, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact.A review of the facilities work-orders from January 2026 through March 26, 2026 revealed a total of 16 work orders for the entire time span. There was no evidence of a work-order for either the baseboards or the hole in the wall for the 200-hall.An observation was conducted on March 24, 2026 at 9:27 AM past the entrance doors of the 200-hall secured unit. To both sides of the hall, missing sections of baseboards were observed. On the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, facility policy review and the Resident Assessment Instrument, the facility failed to ensure the assessment for one sampled Resident #45. The universe was 25. The deficient practice could result in residents not meeting their needs according to the comprehensive assessment. Findings include:Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included presence of cardiac pacemaker, morbid (severe) obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus with other skin complications, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia.The face sheet in the electronic medical records revealed Resident #45 was identified as a white female.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included Resident #45 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14 which indicated resident was cognitively intact. Section A101 included Resident #45 was white.However, the Prehospital Medical Care Directive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, the facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised to reflect the assessed need for a two-person assist with bathing for one resident's (#167). The universe was 25. The deficient practice led to staff providing care with only one person assist which resulted in the resident sustaining an injury and being hospitalized .Resident #167 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included persistent vegetative state, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, and Crohn's disease.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], did not assess Resident #167's cognitive status. The same MDS also noted that Resident #167's functional status for bathing was total dependence and required 1-person physical assist.The care plan indicated dated December 6, 2022 revealed the resident required total assist for all Activities of Daily Living…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, review of the facility's policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#167) was free from unavoidable accidents. The universe was 25. The deficient practice resulted in a resident sustaining a major injury.-Resident #167 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included persistent vegetative state, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, and Crohn's disease.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], did not assess Resident #167's cognitive status. The same MDS also noted that Resident #167's functional status for bathing was total dependence and required 1-person physical assist.The care plan indicated dated December 6, 2022 revealed the resident required total assist for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) which included bathing; and, was at risk for falling related to weakness. The goal was that the resident will remain free from injury.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATIED ASSOCIATES — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ