Timber Point Healthcare Center
205 East Spring Street, Camp Point, IL 62320 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 110 certified beds · (217) 593-7734 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $131,617 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-15)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.5% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 53.3% | 54.2% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.0% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.3% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.5% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.7% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.6% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.5% | 63.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.5% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.9% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.92 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.11 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 32.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.3%CMS range 33.6–59.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.2%CMS range 5.8–12.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 32.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 21.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 14.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 4.0–14.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 72.0 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.70 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.51 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.85 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer prescribed opioid medications to keep residents' pain controlled, failed to perform a pain assessment while the residents were not receiving their prescribed opioid medications, and failed to develop a pain plan of care for two of three residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for pain in the sample of three. These findings resulted in R1, who suffers from bone cancer, experiencing uncontrolled lower back pain and resulted in R2, who suffers from Osteomyelitis from a flesh-eating wound caused by a spider bite, experiencing uncontrolled severe continuous and unbearable pain to his right lower leg wound. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. While the immediacy was removed on 3-11-24, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity Level II as additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of their Removal plan and Quality Assurance monitoring. Findings include: The facility's Pain Management…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain scheduled opioid medications from the pharmacy for two of three residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of three. This failure resulted in R1 abruptly stopping and missing her scheduled Fentanyl patch (Opioid Medication) for two weeks resulting in R1 experiencing withdrawal symptoms of a fall, night terrors, drooped eyes with continuous blinking, shallow and quick breaths, non-reactive pupils, garbled speech, and hypertensive. This failure also resulted in R2 abruptly stopping his scheduled Oxycodone (Opioid Medications) for three days resulting in R2 experiencing withdrawal symptoms of refusing to eat, chills, nausea, and vomiting. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. While the immediacy was removed on 3-11-24, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity Level II as additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of their Removal plan and Quality Assurance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gdisputed · IIDR2026-02-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess a resident's risk of abuse and failed to adequately supervise a resident to prevent resident-to-resident physical abuse for two of three residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of four. These findings resulted in R2 and R3 physically assaulting each other and R3 experiencing pain, ongoing increased anxiety, fear, and restlessness.Findings Include:The facility's Abuse and Retaliation Policy Prevention Program Policy dated 1/2026 documents, Policy: The facility affirms the right of our resident to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, retaliation, misappropriation or property, deprivation of goods and services by staff, or mistreatment. The facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation or property, and mistreatment of residents. In order to do so, the facility has attempted to establish a resident-sensitive and resident-secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to ensure that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to update the care plan with pressure relieving interventions, implement pressure relieving interventions to prevent facility acquired pressure ulcers, conduct routine skin checks, and perform Braden Scale Assessments (Pressure Risk Assessments) quarterly as directed by the facility's policy for three of five residents (R4, R10, and R32) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 44. These failures resulted in R4 developing two facility acquired painful stage two pressure ulcers to R4's buttocks, R32 developing a facility acquired unstageable deep tissue pressure injury to R32's right heel that continues to worsen, and R10 developing a facility acquired painful unstageable pressure ulcer to R10's right heel that required surgical debridement (removing of damaged tissue). Findings include: The facility's Measurement of Alterations in Skin Integrity policy dated [DATE] documents Policy: 1. At first observation of any skin condition, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain was controlled, and assess pain on a daily basis for one of one reviewed for pain in the sample of three. These failures resulted in R2 having excruciating pain during wound care. Findings include: The facility's Pain-Clinical Protocol, dated 2008, documents, The staff will discuss significant changes in levels of comfort with the attending physician who will adjust interventions accordingly. This may include adjustments of regular and PRN (as needed) analgesic doses to find the best combination of effectiveness and tolerable side effects, or possible addition of non-pharmacological interventions. R2's Care plan, dated 11/14/23, documents, R2 has increased potential for complications and discomfort related to the diagnosis of arthritis. The care plan also documents the following interventions: Monitor and record any complaints of pain: location, duration, quantity, quality, alleviating factors, aggravating factors; Monitor and record any non-verbal signs of pain: (e.g. guarding,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A.Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication storage rooms were kept clean and in good repair. These failures have the potential to affect all 67 residents residing in the facility.B. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure opened multi-dose injectable medications were labeled with the date when opened and a multi-dose insulin pen was disposed of after the expiration date and ensure medications were stored in their original packaging until administered for three of five residents (R6, R37 and R61) reviewed for storage and labeling of medications in a sample of 33. Findings include: A. The facility's CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Form 671 dated [DATE] and signed by V1 (Administrator), documents 67 residents reside within the facility. The facility's Medication Room Cleaning Policy dated 6/26 documents, To maintain a clean, safe, and sanitary medication room that supports infection prevention,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food service sanitation and infection control practices were maintained by failing to label opened food items stored in refrigerators and dry storage racks with the date an item was opened, ensuring staff wore hair restraints while working in the kitchen, and failing to maintain proper chlorine sanitizer levels in the dishwashing machine. These failures have the potential to affect all 66 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include:The facility's Labeling and Dating Foods policy, no date, documents, Policy, prepared and packaged foods will be labeled and rotated to decrease the risk of food-borne illnesses, provide the highest quality product for the residents, and minimize waste. Refrigerator Stores, foods prepared on the premises to be held cold will be labeled with the date of preparation and time as required for cooling purposes. Potentially hazardous foods that contain a Sell by date, Use by date, or Expiration date, such as cottage cheese, milk, soft cheese, non-cured deli meats, egg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a call light was in reach for four of 17 residents (R8, R48, R50, R71) reviewed for call lights in a sample of 33. Findings include:The facility's Answering Call Light Policy, dated 8/2008, documents The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs. 5. When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. 1. R8's Care Plan, dated 3/30/26, documents (R8) requires assistance of 1-2 staff with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) related to (R8's) diagnosis of sepsis, increased weakness, decreased mobility, lack of coordination, and abnormal gait and mobility. (R8's) level of function fluctuates throughout the day due to recent Urinary Tract Infection and Sepsis. Fluctuating cognitive function impacting (R8's) level of function and staff assistance needed to [NAME] her ADL/functional ability needs. On 6/14/26 at 10:00 AM, R8 was lying in her bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessments for three of 17 residents (R3, R44, and R50) reviewed for MDS Accuracy in the sample of 33. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Assessment/MDS Policy undated documents Policy: It is the policy of this facility to perform a comprehensive, accurate, standardized, reproducible assessment of each residence status following admission, quarterly thereafter and annually in order to obtain information vital to the development of the resident's plan of care. In addition to facility approved departmental assessment forms, the assessment shall be summarized using a standardized federally and state approved uniform data set. Standards: 11. All assigned disciplines shall participate in the completion of the MDS assessment form and shall verify accuracy and completion of each respective section by indicating the letter of the section, adding their signature and dating. The scope of each discipline's assessment is defined by professional practice or industry guidelines.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' fingernails were kept clean and trimmed for two of 17 residents (R28 and R71) reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) in the sample of 33.Findings include: The facility's Nail Care Guidelines dated 2/23 documents Guidelines: Nail care includes routine cleaning and regular trimming. Proper nail care can aid in the prevention of skin problems around the nail bed. Trimmed and smooth nails prevent the resident from accidentally scratching and injuring his or her skin. 1.R71's MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 5/21/26, documents R71 requires substantial/maximal assistance for personal hygiene. R71's current Care Plan documents R71 requires staff assist with R71's ADL's including bathing, dressing, grooming, transfers, and mobility as required. On 6/14/2026 at 10:09 AM, R71 was sitting in his recliner. All R71's fingernails were long, jagged, with dark brown matter underneath the nails. R71 stated he wants his fingernails trimmed and cleaned and the staff have not done it since R71…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify a pressure ulcer, failed to document physician notification and treatment orders, and failed to document a pressure ulcer assessment for one of two residents (R69) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 33. Findings include:The Pressure/Skin Breakdown policy dated 1/2026 documents 2. The nurse shall assess and document/report the following: a. Full assessment of skin condition including but not limited to location, stage or partial/full thickness, length, width and depth, presence of exudates or necrotic tissue. 7. The physician will authorize pertinent orders related to wound treatments, including pressure redistribution surfaces, wound cleansing and debridement approaches, dressings (occlusive, absorptive, etc. (Etcetera), and application of topical agents. R69's computerized Medical Record documents that R69 is a [AGE] year-old that was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Fibromyalgia, Diabetes Mellitus,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative services were provided for two (R4, R7) of two residents reviewed for range of motion in a sample of 33.Findings Include:The facility's Rehabilitative Nursing Care policy dated/revised April 2007 documents, policy statement, rehabilitative nursing care is provided for each resident admitted . Policy interpretation and implementation, 4. Rehabilitative nursing care is provided to residents who require it. Such a program includes but is not limited to: f. assisting residents with their routine range of motion exercises. 5, through the resident care plan, the goals of rehabilitative nursing care are reinforced in the Activities Program, Therapy Services, etc.On 6/14/2026 at 11:00 AM, R4 was in bed resting, dressed, and pleasant. R4 stated he never has any staff member coming in and helping him with range of motion or any exercises in bed for his arms or legs. R4 stated he would like to have someone do this, he feels his joints would feel better and not be sore and cramped.R4's Care Plan dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders when administering insulin for one of five residents (R6) reviewed for significant medication errors in a sample of 33.Findings include:The facility's Preventing and Detecting Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors, dated, [DATE], documents Procedures C. Facility staff monitor the resident for possible medication-related adverse consequences, including mental status and level of consciousness, when the following conditions occur: 1) A clinically significant change in condition/status. 2. Addition or discontinuation of medications and/or non-pharmacologic interventions. 6. Medication error, example: wrong or expired medication. D. When any of the above occurs, the prescriber and/or staff rule out medication as a cause and document it in the resident's clinic record. 1) A review of medications potential causes of permanent significant change that requires a Significant Change of Status MDS (Minimum Data Set)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide physical therapy and occupational therapy services as ordered by the physician for two of two residents (R1 and R9) reviewed for therapy services in the sample of 33.Findings include:The facility's Specialized Rehabilitation Services policy dated 2/20/26 documents, It is the policy of this facility to provide specialized and supportive rehabilitative services either directly, or through arrangements with services provider. Services shall be provided in accordance with the assessment results, the written comprehensive plan of care, and in accordance with physician's orders. Rehabilitative services shall be provided to all residents whose physician has determined a need and the resident or their legal representative consents to the service. A qualified therapist shall evaluate the resident and develop a plan of care which includes the amount, frequency, and duration within three days of the physician's order. The qualified therapist will assess the resident and develop a plan of care including the type, amount,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of resident-to-resident physical abuse for two of three residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of four.Findings include:The facility's Abuse and Retaliation Policy Prevention Program Policy dated 1/2026 documents, Internal Investigation: Any incident or allegation involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, retaliation, mistreatment, or misappropriation or resident property will result in an investigation. Investigation Procedures: The appointed investigation will, at a minimum, attempt to interview the person who reported the incident, anyone likely to have direct knowledge of the incident, and the resident, if interviewable. Any written statements that have been submitted will be reviewed, along with any pertinent medical record or other documents.R2's Progress Notes dated 1/2/26 at 11:26 PM and signed by V3 (Registered Nurse/RN) document, This nurse heard yelling from the middle hall. Upon entering room noted (R2) wheeling out of a female resident's room (R3's). (R3)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed monitor and record cool down temperatures for prepared meats, label opened food items in the refrigerators, label opened dry foods, and failed to use correct dish machine sanitizing test strips. These failures have the potential to affect all 69 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Form 671 dated 6-1-25 and signed by V1 (Administrator) documents 69 residents currently reside within the facility. The facility's two stage cool down process policy (not dated), documents, Potentially hazardous foods will be cooled properly to prevent food borne illness. Foods will be cooled to proper temperatures. The time and temperature of food cooling will be documented at two- and four-hour intervals. The facility's labeling and dating food policy (not dated), documents, Prepared and packaged foods will be labeled and rotated to decrease the risk of food borne illnesses, provide the highest quality of product for the residents and minimize waste.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to track infections of individuals who enter or live in the facility per CMS (Central Management Services) requirement. This failure had the potential to affect all 69 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: The facility's CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Form 671 dated 6-1-25 and signed by V1 (Administrator) documents 69 residents currently reside within the facility. The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Manual Infection Prevention and Control Program (not dated) documents, A system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors, and other individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement based upon the facility assessment conducted according to regulatory requirements and following accepted national standards. A system of surveillance that is designed to identify possible communicable diseases or infections before they can spread to other persons in the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-03 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to designate or hire a full-time infection preventionist per CMS (Central Management Services) requirement. This failure had the potential to affect all 69 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: The facility's CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Form 671 dated 6-1-25 and signed by V1 (Administrator) documents 69 residents currently reside within the facility. The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Manual Infection Prevention and Control Program (not dated) documents, The facility will designate one or more individual(s) as the infection preventionist(s)(IP)(s) who is responsible for the facility's IPCP (infection prevention control program). The infection preventionist will have primary professional training in nursing, medical technology, microbiology, epidemiology, or another related field. Is qualified by education, training, experience, or certification, works at least part time at the facility, has completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. The facility IP will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-03 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure all Certified Nursing Assistants received 12 hours of annual in-service training. This failure has the potential to affect all 69 residents residing within the facility. Findings Include: The facility's CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Form 671 dated 6-1-25 and signed by V1 (Administrator) documents 69 residents currently reside within the facility. All CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) trainings from 1/1/2024 through 6/2/2025 were reviewed and no CNAs received 12 hours of required annual in-service training. On 6/3/2025 at 1:30 PM, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) confirmed all CNAs currently employed at the facility have not received 12 hours of annual in-service training required.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-03 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to resolve several repeated grievances for eight of eight residents (R5, R14, R23, R30, R31, R47, R50, R58) reviewed for grievances in a sample of 44. Finding Include: The facility's grievance policy dated/revised 1/2025, documents, To provide a process to assist residents, their representatives such as other interested family members or other resident advocates in filing grievances or complaints when such requests are made. Consistent with 483.12(c)(1), by anyone furnishing services on behalf of the provider, all alleged violations involving neglect, abuse, including injuries of unknown source and/or misappropriation of resident property will be immediately reported to the administrator of the provider as required by state law. Written grievance decisions will include the date the grievance was received, a summary statement of the resident grievance, steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the residents concern(s), a statement as to whether the grievance as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed weekly as ordered and dated for five of five residents (R5, R12, R13, R38, and R39) reviewed for oxygen in the sample of 44. Findings include: The facility's Respiratory Therapy Prevention of Infection policy dated 8/2008 documents The purpose of this procedure is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment, including ventilators, among residents and staff. Steps in the Procedure - Infection Control Considerations Related to Oxygen Administration 7. Change the oxygen cannula and tubing every seven (7) days, or as needed. 8. Keep the oxygen cannula and tubing used PRN (as needed) in a plastic bag when not in use. Documentation - The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 1. The date and time the respirator therapy was performed. 1.) R38's current Physician Order Report documents, 04/22/25 Oxygen: Change tubing and mask weekly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a plan of care to address advanced directives for one of two residents (R44) reviewed for advanced directives in the sample of 44. Findings include: The facility's Advanced Directive and Advanced Care Planning/POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) Guideline dated [DATE] documents Purpose: It is the practice of the facility to establish, implement and maintain written guidelines for advanced directives and advanced care planning/POLST. The resident has the right and the facility will assist the resident to formulate an advance directive at their option. Procedure: G. During the quarterly RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) process and with any significant changes of condition, facility staff will a. Identify, clarify, and review the existing care instructions and whether the resident wishes to change or continue instructions from the advance directive. e. Changes to the resident choices for advanced directives will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of intravenous medication for one of one resident (R319) reviewed for misappropriation of medications out of a sample list of 44. Findings include: The Abuse Prevention Policy undated documents This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation of property, and mistreatment of residents. In order to do so, the facility has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff and mistreatment of residents. Misappropriation of Resident Property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to issue a bed hold notice for two of two residents (R25 and R28) reviewed for hospitalization in the sample of 44. Findings include: The facility's Bed Hold and readmission policy dated November 2016 documents Standards: 1. Residents, or their designated representative, shall be informed of this policy at the time of admission and at the time of transfer to a hospital, or for therapeutic leave which extends beyond 24 hours. The facility provides written notification at the time of transfer as included in the designated state form. The notice to the resident or the representative will specify the facility's policy, the duration of the state bed hold policy and the reserve bed payment policy. 2 In the event of an emergency hospitalization the resident or their representative shall be notified by telephone or in person of this policy, within 24 hours, and asked to provide the facility with their decision. The staff member making the call or explaining the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to accurately code a MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment for one of 17 residents (R44) reviewed for MDS accuracy in the sample of 44. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Assessment/MDS Policy undated documents Policy: It is the policy of this facility to perform a comprehensive, accurate, standardized, reproducible assessment of each residence status following admission, quarterly thereafter and annually in order to obtain information vital to the development of the resident's plan of care. In addition to facility approved departmental assessment forms, the assessment shall be summarized using a standardized federally and state approved uniform data set. Standards: 11. All assigned disciplines shall participate in the completion of the MDS assessment form and shall verify accuracy and completion of each respective section by indicating the letter of the section, adding their signature and dating. The scope of each discipline's assessment is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to refer a resident to the PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) State Agency to obtain a Level II PASRR after being diagnosed with a Mental Illness for one of one resident (R31) reviewed for Mental Illness in the sample of 44. Findings Include: The Pre-admission Screening and Resident review (PASRR) policy, undated documents It is the policy of this facility to 1. Comply with Federal, State and the appointed screening agency Maximus, in standards addressing the PASRR assessment/screening process. 2. Request full and complete PASRR materials (Level 1 and 2) from each referral source prior to or soon following admission. Procedure: 1. A facility representative shall request the complete screening from the referral source. 2. A copy of all the materials received will be placed in the residence business file and the EMR (electronic medical record) at the discretion of administration. R31's admission Record documents that R31 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the fingernails were kept trimmed for two of 17 residents (R29 and R37) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Assistance in the sample of 44. Findings include: The facility's Nail Care Guidelines dated 2/23 documents Guidelines: Nail care includes routine cleaning and regular trimming. Proper nail care can aid in the prevention of skin problems around the nail bed. Trimmed and smooth nails prevent the resident from accidentally scratching and injuring his or her skin. 1. R29's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documents R29 requires substantial/maximal assistance of staff for personal hygiene. R29's Shower Sheets dated 03/01/25 through 06/02/25 document R29's fingernails have not been trimmed during this timeframe. On 06/01/25 at 9:54 AM R29 was lying in bed. All of R29's fingernails were long, jagged, and extended past her fingertips. R29 stated she cannot remember the last time her nails were clipped. R29…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to follow the Advanced Directive for one of two residents (R65) reviewed for Advanced Directive in the sample of 44. Findings include: The Advanced Directive and Advanced Care Planning/POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) Guideline dated [DATE] documents Purpose: It is the practice of the facility to establish, implement and maintain written guidelines for advanced directives and advanced care planning/POLST. The resident has the right and the facility will assist the resident to formulate an advance directive at their option. Procedure: G. During the quarterly RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) process and with any significant changes of condition, facility staff will a. Identify, clarify, and review the existing care instructions and whether the resident wishes to change or continue instructions from the advance directive. e. Changes to the resident choices for advanced directives will be documented, included in the resident plan of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter bag was secured and off the floor for one (R64) of two residents reviewed for catheters in the sample list of 44. Findings include: The Urinary Catheter Care policy dated September 2005 documents The purpose of this procedure is to prevent infection of the resident's urinary tract. General Guidelines: 11. Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. R64's current Physician Orders document R64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a 16 F (French) indwelling (urinary) catheter for urinary retention. On 06/01/25 at 11:02 AM, R64 was laying supine in bed with R64's indwelling urinary catheter bag laying on the floor next to R64's bed. On 06/03/25 at 10:00 AM, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated indwelling urinary catheter bags should be secured to the side of the bed and below the bladder. V5 further stated a urinary catheter bag should never be on the floor.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify the physician of a resident not receiving a physician ordered enteral nutrition formula by gastrostomy tube for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for physician notification in the sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Gastric Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump policy dated 08/2008 documents, Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide nourishment to the resident who is unable to obtain nourishment orally. Verify compliance with physician's order, including the product volume and infusion rate. Report any complications promptly to the physician. 1. R1's Hospital Discharge Orders dated 11-21-24 document, Tube Feeding: Osmolite 1.5 at a goal rate of 45 ml (milliliter) per hour. R1's Medications Flowsheet dated 11-21-24 (R1's Admission) through 11-30-24 documents R1 did not receive her physician ordered Osmolite 1.5 calorie/ml (milliliter) at 45 ml per hour via gastrostomy tube on 11-21-24 through 11-25-24. R1's Medical Record does not include documentation of a physician being notified of R1 not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-14 · tag F0620 — isolatedNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to follow their Admission's Contract to perform an inventory of a resident's personal belongings for one of three residents (R3) reviewed for personal belongings in the sample of three. Findings include: R3's admission Contract dated 8-20-24 documents, An inventory sheet will be provided for you and/or your family to fill out to identify all belongings upon admission. Please complete the inventory sheet in its entirety and sign/date. If you need assistance with filling out the inventory sheet, please contact a facility staff member and someone will be assigned to assist you. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documents R3 is cognitively intact. R3's Medical Record does not include an Inventory Sheet of R3's personal belongings. On 12-13-24 at 12:40 PM R3 stated, When I came into the facility my caregiver brought in a tote of my belongings. The staff made me leave my things with them for three days. The staff said they clean everything…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to administer a physician ordered enteral nutrition formula by gastrostomy tube for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for a gastrostomy feeding tube in the sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Gastric Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump policy dated 08/2008 documents, Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide nourishment to the resident who is unable to obtain nourishment orally. Verify compliance with physician's order, including the product volume and infusion rate. Documentation: 1. The date and time the procedure was performed. 2. The amount and type of enteral feeding. 1. R1's admission Record documents R1 was admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] with the diagnoses of alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, gastrostomy, ulcerative chronic pancolitis, gastrostomy, and hypocalcemia. R1's Hospital Discharge Orders dated 11-21-24 document, Tube Feeding: Osmolite 1.5 at a goal rate of 45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide readily available grievance forms and failed to post grievance/complaint procedures in a prominent location throughout the facility. This has the potential to affect all 70 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facilities CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services) Long Term Care Facility Application four Medicare and Medicaid Form 671 dated 7/8/24 and signed by V1/Administrator documents 70 residents currently reside within the facility. The facility's Grievance Policy dated 11-2016 documents, A copy of the facility's grievance/complaint procedures is posted in prominent locations throughout the facility. Grievance postings will include the contact information of the grievance official including name, business address, e-mail, and phone number. On 7/9/2024 at 2:00 PM during resident council meeting R25, R30, R53, R36, and R40 all stated that they do not know where or how to file a grievance. On 7/10/2024 at 10:30 AM, a wooden box was located to the left of the activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-11 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the resident/resident representatives with a written notice of transfer. This has the potential to affect all 70 resident's residing in the facility. Findings include: R43's medical record documents that R43 was transferred to a local hospital on 3/15/24. No evidence of a facility notification to R43 of a transfer/discharge was present in R43's chart. R56's medical record documents that R56 was transferred to a local hospital on 6/4/24. No evidence of a facility notification to R56 of a transfer/discharge was present in R56's chart. On 7/8/24 at 1:15 PM V2/DON verified the facility did not provide R43, R56, or their representatives with a written notice of transfer. V2/DON stated, I am not aware of a written notice of transfer form we (the facility) are supposed to give to the residents when they discharge to the Hospital. We (the facility) only send the continuity of care form that has the resident's current vitals and medications. The nurses would be the ones to give the resident the written notice of transfer,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-11 · tag F0800 — widespreadProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food items on the Always Available Menu to residents that requested substitution items from their meals. This has the potential to affect all 70 residents living in the facility. Findings: The document, Food Substitution, no date, states, Residents may be offered a substitute if desired. The Dietary List, Facility Always Available (Foods), no date, states, Chef's Salad; Cottage Cheese; Chicken Nuggets; Deli Sandwich; Cheeseburger; Chicken Salad Sandwich; Egg Salad Sandwich; Ham Salad Sandwich; Tuna Salad Sandwich; Grilled Cheese Sandwich; Peanut Butter and Jelly Sandwich; Lettuce and Tomato Salad; Fruit Plate; French Fries; Mashed Potatoes. On 7/09/24 at the 2:00 PM, Resident Council Meeting, the following residents, (R25, R30, R36, R40, R52), stated, We can get a peanut butter and jelly sandwich and maybe a fruit plate, but that is all that we can get. The Certified Nursing Assistants will ask the [NAME] to make us a grilled cheese, or a cheeseburger with lettuce and tomato or something like that and they tell us…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use Cool Down Temperature Logs for potentially hazardous food. This has the potential to affect all 70 residents living in the facility. Findings: The document, Two Stage Cool Down Process, dated 2015, states, Potentially hazardous foods will be cooled properly to prevent food borne illness. Foods will be cooled to proper temperatures. A two stage cooling process will be followed: Stage I: Cool foods from 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 70 degrees F within two (2) hours. Stage II: Cool foods from 70 degrees F to 41 degrees F within four (4) hours. (Total of Six (6) hours.) If prepared from ingredients at room temperature: Cool foods from 70 degrees F to 41 degrees F within four (4) hours. The document, Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) Cooling Log, dated 2024, states, Record temperatures every hour during the cooling cycle. The supervisor of food operation will verify proper cooling procedures by routinely monitoring work activity and reviewing this log. Cooling temperatures will be documented. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a personalized Care Plan for 1 resident (R67) of 24 residents reviewed for personalized Care Plans in the sample of 34. Findings Include: The Care Planning policy dated August 2006, documents Our facility's Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident. R67's current computerized medical record, documents R67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Venous Insufficiency (Chronic) (Peripheral), Sciatica, Left Side (Primary), Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Hypertensive Heart Disease Without Heart Failure, and Localized Edema. R67's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 6/10/24 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score of 13/15, indicating cognition intact. On 07/08/24 at 10:47 AM, R67 was sitting in her room in her wheelchair. R67 stated her legs have been swelling a lot and R67 needs to wear compression…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Observation, Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to provide physician ordered Ketoconazole cream (anti-fungal topical cream) timely to a resident with known topical yeast growth for one of one resident (R38) reviewed for skin conditions in the sample of 34. Findings include: The facility's Drug Order Policy (undated), documents It is the policy of this facility to obtain a physician's order for all medications and treatments and to process medication orders to ensure the resident's medical plan of care is implemented, on a timely basis. This same policy documents All orders from a licensed practitioner for resident drugs are processed by a licensed nurse and entered in the resident's medical record. The medication orders are processed timely, i.e. (that is) called/faxed to the selected pharmacy, is indicated on the resident identification. Drug order shall be transcribed onto the medication record by the licensed nurse who received them as soon as practical after the physician's order is received. R38's current care plan, dated 6/26/24, documents (R38) is at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide physician ordered yogurt with all meals, obtain physician ordered daily weights, provide lunch meals when out of the facility at scheduled hemodialysis, communicate with the dialysis center before and after treatments, monitor a central venous catheter dialysis port and ensure a resident's care plan documents detailed dialysis care and required services for a resident receiving renal hemodialysis for one of one resident (R38) reviewed for dialysis in the sample of 34. Findings include: The facility's Dialysis Transfer Agreement, dated 7/19/10, documents Facility shall ensure that all appropriate medical, social, administrative and other information accompany all designated residents at the time of transfer to (dialysis) Center. This information shall include, but is not limited to, where appropriate, the following: Appropriate medical records, including history of the designated resident's illness, including laboratory and x-ray findings; Treatment presently being provided to the designated resident,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and monitor targeted psychotic behaviors to warrant the use of Abilify (antipsychotic medication) and attempt a gradual dose reduction of the medication in the past year for one of three residents (R25) reviewed for antipsychotic medications in the sample of 34. Findings include: The facility's Antipsychotic Medication Use policy dated/revised August 2008 documents, The Attending Physician and other staff will gather and document information to clarify a resident's behavior, mood, function, medical condition, symptoms, and risks. Nursing staff will document an individual's target symptom(s). The Attending Physician will identify, evaluate, and document with input from other disciplines and consultants as needed, symptoms that may warrant the use of antipsychotic medications. The staff will observe, document, and report to the Attending Physician information regarding the effectiveness of any interventions, including antipsychotic medications. Based on assessing the resident's symptoms and overall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for a resident with a Central Venous Catheter dialysis port for one of one resident (R38) reviewed for Dialysis in the sample of 34. Findings include: The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated 2023, documents It is the policy of this facility that Enhanced Barrier Precautions, in addition to Standard and Contact Precautions will be implemented during high-contact resident care activities when caring for residents that have an increased risk for acquiring a multi-drug-resistant organism (MDRO) such as a resident with wounds, indwelling medical devices or residents with infection or colonization with an MDRO. High-Contact resident care activities include: Dressing, Bathing/Showering, Transferring, Provide Hygiene, Changing Linens, Changing Briefs or toileting, Device care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy/ventilator, Wound care: any skin opening requiring a dressing. Procedure: Post clear signage on the door/wall outside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify the physician and a resident's representative immediately once prescribed opioid medications were not obtained or administered as ordered for two of three residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for notification of changes in the sample of three. Findings include: 1. R1's Physician's Orders dated 10-5-23 through 3-8-24 document, Fentanyl 100 mcg per hour one patch transdermal once a day every three days at 9:00 PM for the diagnoses of Multiple Myeloma not having achieved remission. R1's Medication Flow Sheets dated 1-1-24 through 2-31-24 document R1's Fentanyl Patch 100 mcg/hour transdermal placed at 9:00 PM was not administered as scheduled on 1-25-24, 1-28-24, 1-31-24, or 2-3-24. These same Medication Flow Sheets document R1 did not have a Fentanyl 100 mcg/hour patch applied until 2-6-24. R1's Progress Notes dated 1-29-24 at 5:49 AM and signed by V5 (RN/Registered Nurse) document, At 5:45 am (R1) heard yelling (female's name) and had fallen in room. Fall was witnessed by roommate who states (R1) was having a nightmare and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the residents' representatives were invited and attended care plan conferences for two of three residents (R1 and R3) reviewed for care planning in the sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team policy dated 08/06 documents, The resident, the resident's family and/or the resident's legal representative/guardian or surrogate are encouraged to participate in the development of and revisions to the resident's care plan. Every effort will be made to schedule care plan meetings at the best time of the day for the resident and family. 1. R1's Medical Record dated 8-24-23 through 3-8-24 does not include any documentation of V8 (R1's Power of Attorney/POA) being invited or attending R1's care plan meetings except on one occasion (2-14-24). On 3-8-24 at 12:25 PM V8 (R1's Power of Attorney) stated, I have not been invited to a care plan meeting since (R1) was admitted until 2-14-24. I need to be involved with (R1's) care plan meetings to ensure the facility is taking appropriate care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a newly identified pressure ulcer, and obtain a physician ordered treatment for two of three residents (R1, R3) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Prevention of Pressure Wounds policy, dated 1/17, documents, Once a pressure injury develops, it can be extremely difficult to heal. Pressure injuries are a serious skin condition for the resident. The facility should have a system/procedure to assure assessments are timely and appropriate and changes in condition are recognized, evaluated, reported to the practitioner, physician, and family, and addressed. Routinely assess and document the condition of the resident's skin per facility wound and skin care program for any signs and symptoms of irritation or breakdown. Immediately report any signs of developing pressure injury. 1. R1's Braden Scale Assessment, dated 10/25/23, documents a score of 13 putting R1 at a moderate risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-06-16 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the daily resident census and direct care staff posting was posted in an area accessible to residents and visitors. This failure has the potential to affect all 67 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:The facility's CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Form 671 dated 6/14/26 and signed by V1 (Administrator), documents 67 residents reside within the facility.The facility's Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers policy dated 08/08 documents, Our facility will post on a daily status for each shift, the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents. At the beginning of each shift facility shall post the nurse staffing data as required by state and federal regulations. The information should be clean and readable format. The information should be posted in a prominent place accessible to residents and visitors. Shit staffing information shall be recorded on the form provided by the facility's Administrator for each shift. The information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$131,617 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $83,230 — penalty dated 2026-02-15
- $48,387 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-14 for 19 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ATIED ASSOCIATES — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAY, SHERWIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 01/01/2015 |
| ROTHNER, ERIC | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 33% | since 04/02/2010 |
| ARONIN, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2015 |
| B & Z GRANDCHILDREN TR | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2015 |
| EXTENDED CARE CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2015 |
| MARCUM LLP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2015 |
| DIXON, WILLIAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2016 |
| JOHNSON, KIMBERLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| ATIED ASSOCIATES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/09/2025 |
| EXTENDED CARE CLINICAL LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/09/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $533K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145726. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.