Rushville Nursing & Rehab Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 74.2 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-06-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff respected R1's right to refuse care, failed to prevent staff from using physical force during care, and failed to protect R1 from abuse when staff held R1's arms and hands down and provided care against R1's expressed refusal while R1 repeatedly yelled No, Get off me, and Let go of me. These failures resulted in R1 being manually restrained during care, caused R1 fear, distress, and psychosocial harm, and created Immediate Jeopardy to resident health and safety.These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 10/28/25 when staff forced care on R1 despite R1's refusal and signs of distress. V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 5/28/26 at 9:25 am. While the immediacy was removed on 5/30/26, the Facility's noncompliance remained at a Severity Level Two due to the need for additional monitoring to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the facility's plan of correction.Findings include:The facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely assessment, monitoring, physician notification, diagnostic evaluation, and intervention for significant changes in condition related to urinary catheter complications and signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI) for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheters in the sample of three. The facility failed to recognize, investigate, escalate, and respond to repeated abnormal urinary findings and changes in condition despite R1's known history of recurrent UTIs, urosepsis, and rapid clinical decline requiring prior hospitalizations. The facility's repeated failure to identify and respond to ongoing signs and symptoms consistent with urinary tract infection and catheter complications resulted in delayed medical treatment and caused R1 to experience acute clinical deterioration, respiratory distress, sepsis secondary to urinary tract infection, supraventricular tachycardia requiring cardioversion, mechanical ventilation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to utilize a gait belt during ambulation, for one resident (R2) of three residents, in a total sample of three residents reviewed for supervision. This failure resulted in R2 being hospitalized , with a femur fracture which required surgical intervention. Findings Include: Facility Policy, entitled Gait Belts, dated 4/13, document, Gait belts are used to help prevent injury of staff or residents during transfers and ambulation; 1. Gait belts should be used by all staff when ambulating or transferring a resident with an unsteady gait. R2's Electronic Medical Record/EMR document R2's diagnosis to include: Displaced supracondylar fracture with intracondylar extension of lower end of left femur, Muscle wasting and atrophy, Muscle Weakness, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Heart Disease, Hypertension, Peripheral vascular disease, Displaced fracture of proximal phalanx of left lesser toe, Displaced fracture of proximal phalanx of right little…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-05-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement pressure relieving interventions and perform daily Diabetic foot skin assessments for one of two residents (R47) reviewed for impaired skin integrity, in a sample of 27. These failures resulted in R47 developing unstageable pressure ulcers to the right and left heel after being admitted to the facility, which lead to osteomyelitis of the left heel and a delay in his discharge back to home. Findings include: The facility policy, titled Pressure Ulcer and Wound Prevention/Management Program (updated 12/05/2006) documents, Purpose: To identify residents who are at risk for pressure ulcers and skin breakdown. To prevent pressure ulcers and skin breakdown. To provide a guideline for the appropriate nursing management of skin breakdown when it occurs. Responsibility: Director of Nursing, Licensed Nurses, Certified Nursing Assistants, Restorative Nursing, Care Plan Coordinator, Dietitian, Physician and Medical Director. Policy: It is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to notify medication changes to a Resident Representative for one of seven Residents (R1) reviewed for new medications in a sample of seven.Findings include:The Notification of Change Guideline Policy, dated 10/1/24, documents: it is the practice of the Facility that changes in Resident condition or treatment are immediately shared with the Resident or Resident Representative, according to their authority, and are reported to and consulted with the attending physician; resident/resident representative will be educated about treatment options and supported to make an informed decision; objective of the notification guidelines is to ensure Facility staff make appropriate and immediate notification to the Resident and/or Representative when there is a change in condition (significant treatment alteration including commencing a new form of treatment; document the notification and record any new orders in the Residents medical record; educate the Resident/Resident Representative about the plan to treat, risks and benefits of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the Facility failed to initiate appropriate fall interventions for one of four Residents (R6) reviewed for falls in a sample of six.Findings include:The Facility Fall Clinical Protocol Policy, revised 8/2008, documents: as part of the initial assessment, the Physician will help identify individuals with a history of falls and risk factors for subsequent falling; staff will continue to collect and evaluate information until either the cause of falling is identified, or it is determined that the cause cannot be found, or that finding a cause would not change the outcome or management of falling and fall risk; based on the preceding assessment, the staff and physician will identify pertinent interventions to try to prevent subsequent falls and to address risks of serious consequences of falling; and staff and physician will monitor and document the individual's response to interventions intended to reduce falling or the consequences of falling.The Facility Resident Rights Policy, dated 2007, documents Personal Safety, the Resident has the right to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene after glove removal for two (R41 and R119) of 18 reviewed for infection control and failed to adhere to masking during an influenza outbreak. The failure of non-masking has the potential to affect all 71 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings Include: The Facility's undated Preventing and Controlling ARI (Acute Respiratory Illness) in Skilled Nursing Facilities and Other Facilities Providing Nursing Care documents Ensure everyone, including residents, visitors, and HCP (Health Care Providers) are aware of recommended Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) practices in the facility, including when specific IPC actions are being implemented in response to new infections in the facility or increases in respiratory virus levels in the community. Source control is recommended for individuals in health care settings who have suspected or confirmed respiratory infection or respiratory trends or observed trends). The facility Urinary Catheter Care policy and procedure, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food stays warm for six residents (R11, R12, R26, R47, R50, and R119) of six residents reviewed in a total sample of 33. Findings Include: The Facility's undated Hot Food Service Temperatures policy documents foods will be served to the residents at a temperature that is palatable to prevent injury such as burned mouth or lips. Food will be offered to be reheated if it is not within resident's preferred food temperatures or another tray will be offered. On 4/8/25 at 8:30 AM R11, R12, R26, R47, R50, and R119's breakfast trays were sitting out on the dining room tables with either a lid or other plates on top of the dishes. R11, R12, R26, R47, R50, and R119 were not in the dining room at this time. On 4/8/25 at 8:35 AM V4 (Certified Nurse Aid/Transportation) stated that these residents had not come out to the dining room yet and she wasn't sure how long the trays had been sitting at the tables without residents present. V4 stated that staff routinely deliver trays to the resident's regular spot whether the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify, monitor, and review prophylactic antibiotic use for four of four residents (R17, R21, R38, R49) for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of 33. Findings include: The Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 2019 documented an antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. Antibiotic Stewardship and review including reviewing data to monitor the appropriate use of antibiotics in the resident population. The Infection Preventionist will oversee the facility Antibiotic Stewardship Program. review of the use of antibiotics is a vital aspect of the infection prevention and control program. Involve the consultant pharmacist with the oversight by identifying antibiotics prescribed for resistant organisms. Track antibiotic use monthly and completes an antibiogram yearly or as directed by the Medical Director and the Quality Assurance Committee. The Antibiotic Stewardship Policy dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident was treated with respect for one resident (R46) of 18 residents reviewed for respect and dignity in a total sample of 33. Finding Include: The Facility's undated Personal Cell Phone Use documents purpose: to assure that the resident privacy issues are maintained and to eliminate any distraction from responsibilities and duties. Personal cell phones must be turned off when reporting for work and stored in the employee's purse, car, or locker. They are not allowed to be carried on the employee's person while actively working. Employees may check/use their cell phones during break times only Please note employees may not bring the cell phone into any resident areas at any time regardless to break status. On 4/8/25 at 8:30 AM V4 (Transportation/Certified Nurse Aid) was in the dining room assisting R46 while eating. V4 had a utensil in one hand feeding R46 while looking at her phone and texting on her phone with her other hand. V4 stated she did not normally use her phone during cares. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure chemical restraints were not utilized for one resident (R12) of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medication in a total sample of 33. This failure resulted in over sedation and physical functioning for R12. Findings Include: The Facility's Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure, dated 2/2020, documents Chemical Restraint is any drug that is used for discipline or convenience and is not required to treat medical symptoms or behavior manifestations of mental illness. The Facility's undated Psychopharmacological Drug Use Procedure documents the procedure is to assure the appropriate monitoring is provided to residents receiving psychopharmacological drugs, that the lowest possible dose necessary for the benefit of the resident to improve or control mood, mental status and/or behavior is utilized, and to reduce or eliminate the usage of these medications. The Facility's undated Psychopharmacological Drug Use Procedure documents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to obtain a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) after a significant change in condition for one resident (R12) of one reviewed for PASRRs in a total sample of 33. Findings Include: The Facility Admission policy dated November 2016 documents PASSR screens must be valid and reviewed on admission, annually and upon any significant change. All residents with a newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition should be referred for a level II resident review upon a significant change in status admission. R12's admission Physician Order Sheet dated March 2024 documents R12 was admitted with diagnoses that include but were not limited to conversion disorder with seizures, dementia and anxiety. R12's admission Physician Order Sheet did not include any serious mental illness diagnosis. R12's PASSR Level I dated 3/26/2024 did not document any serious mental illness diagnosis. R12's Nurse's Note dated 11/15/2024 document that R12 was sent to the hospital due to increased…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure indwelling urinary catheters were placed securely off the floor in a sanitary manner for two (R41 and R119) of six residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters in the sample of 33. Findings include: The facility Urinary Catheter Care policy and procedure, dated September 2005, documents The purpose of this procedure is to prevent infection of the resident's urinary tract. Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. 1. The current Physician Orders for R41 documents a 7/29/24 physician order for R41 to use a 16 FR (french)/10cc (cubic centimeter) balloon indwelling urinary catheter for the diagnosis of Urinary Retention. The current Care Plan for R41 documents R41 requires an indwelling urinary catheter for a diagnosis of Urinary Retention and requires Enhanced Barrier Precautions due to placement of indwelling urinary catheter. The documented goals as follows: R41 will have catheter care managed appropriately with no signs of infection and to reduce the spread of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing is changed weekly and ear pads are used for residents wearing oxygen for two (R25 and R119) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care in the sample of 33. Findings include: The facility Oxygen Administration policy and procedure, dated March 2004, documents The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Securely anchor the tubing so that it does not rub or irritate the resident's nose, behind the resident's ears, etc. Place ear protectors as needed for residents utilizing oxygen more than 8 hours a day. Observe the resident upon set up and periodically thereafter to be sure oxygen is being tolerated. If the resident refused the procedure, the reasons(s) why and the interventions taken are to be documented in resident medical record. Notify the supervisor if the resident refuses the procedure. 1. The Progress Note for R119, dated 4/2/25, documents R119 readmitted to the facility from the local hospital on 4/1/25 with diagnoses: Adult Failure to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATIED ASSOCIATES — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $799K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL