Cupertino Healthcare & Wellness Center
22590 Voss Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 170 certified beds · (408) 253-9034 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (69) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.6% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.1% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.5% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.4% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.6% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.58 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.14 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 78 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 49.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.1%CMS range 33.9–55.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.7–14.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 49.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 11.7%CMS range 7.7–16.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.34 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 170 beds and averages 155.3 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.552 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
69 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 57 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2021-07-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of Resident 117's medical record indicated she had diagnoses including a history of falling, cerebrovascular accidents (CVA/stroke, a condition resulting from a lack of oxygen in the brain potentially causing a loss of sensory and motor function), right hand, right shoulder, right hip contractures (hardening of muscles and other tissues causing rigidity to the joints) and major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest and can interfere with daily functioning). Review of Resident 117's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated she was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated her balance was not steady when moving from seated to standing position and she needed staff assistance during surface-to-surface transfers, such as toileting. Review of Resident 117's SBAR, dated 6/11/21, indicated Resident 117 bumped and twisted her knee when transferring from the toilet to a wheelchair. During an interview on 7/19/21 at 9:30 a.m., Resident 117 stated CNA X, who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2021-07-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. During the medication pass observation on 7/19/21 at 4:10 p.m. with LVN D, she entered Residents 26 and 69's shared room with a small cup of medications and a 6-ounce cup of water in each hand (two cups in each hand). She was asked to stop and explain the medication administration process. She said she prepared the medications for both residents and was about to give each of them their medications at the same time. She acknowledged preparing and administering medications for two residents at the same time had the potential for medication errors due to resident mix-up. LVN D said she normally prepared medications for one resident at a time. During an interview on 7/20/21 at 12:45 p.m., with the ADON, she said nurses were supposed to prepare and administer medications for one resident at a time to avoid medication errors. A review of the facility's Medication-Administration Nursing Manual - General, dated 1/1/2012, did not address the preparation and administering medications for multiple residents at the same…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of one of three residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's diclofenac sodium (Brand name is Voltaren, a drug used to treat mild to moderate pain, and helps to relieve symptoms of arthritis such as inflammation, swelling, stiffness, and joint pain) was not available for administration on 2/9/2026 at 5:00 p.m. and 2/10/2026 at 9:00 a.m. This failure had the potential for unrelieved pain, inflammation, and stiffness.Findings:A review of Resident 1's clinical record titled, admission Record, dated 2/5/2026, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including ankylosing spondylitis (an inflammatory form of arthritis [a general term for diseases that cause inflammation, pain, stiffness, and swelling in one or more joints] that primarily affects the spine [back bone] causing long-term pain and stiffness) of unspecified sites in spine, rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic disease that causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 1) out of 6 sampled residents was free from physical abuse when a staff physically hit Resident 1 on the face.This failure resulted in a slap on the right side of the face of Resident 1 by CNA A which was witnessed by CNA B. This failure had the potential to put Resident 1 in psychosocial distress. FINDINGS: A review of Resident 1's medical record indicated an admission date of 10/30/25. Resident 1's diagnoses included but were not limited to muscle weakness, bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings) and fracture of one rib, right side, sequela (residual effect that persists after the acute phase of an illness has resolved). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 11/6/25, indicated a brief interview for mental status score of 5 (BIMS - an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident; a score of 0 to 7 indicates severe cognitive impairment, 8-12 moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen when:1.A peeled/sliced peaches was beside the red and green bucket at the three-compartment sink tap;2. Two kitchen staff did not perform handwashing/ hand hygiene before and after gloving; and 3. An open box of Almond nondairy beverage was inside the residents' refrigerator with an open date of 12/18/25 and use by date of 12/21/25 and still there on 12/22/25. These failures had the potential to cause food contamination and spread food-borne illnesses to residents who received their food from the kitchen.Findings:1. During a concurrent initial kitchen observation and interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 12/16/25 at 10:55 a.m., it was observed in the three-compartment sink tap was a clear square food storage container with peeled /sliced and chopped peaches without cover and left open beside the green and red plastic bucket with chemical solution. Dietary [NAME] (DC) F verified the above observation and stated the peaches should not be placed at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure refuse materials (any disposable materials, which include recyclable and non-recyclable materials) were disposed properly when One of two garbage dumpsters were found to be overflowing, and garbage bags were found on the floor outside the containers. This failure had the potential for an unsafe environment for the residents and visitors due to possible pest infestation and spread of diseases in the facility. Findings:During the initial observation at the designated waste area on 12/19/25 at 8:12 a.m., one garbage dumpster was observed to be overflowing. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/22/25 at 9:00 a.m., accompanied by the Dietary Manger (DM) and Maintenance Director (MD), at the designated waste area, two black plastic bags and cardboard were outside of the dumpster. Both MD and DM confirmed the observation and stated it should be put inside the bins. The MD stated the garbage should be placed inside the dumpster to prevent attracting pests and for infection control. The United…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a valid copy of a resident's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a written medical order that assists people in making decisions about medical treatment and life saving measures during end-of-life care or medical crisis) when one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 3) had a POLST with no signature and identity of the person who discussed it. This failure had the potential to result in a resident's end-of-life choices not being honored. Findings:A review of Resident 's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 12/18/25, indicated that Resident 3 was admitted on [DATE] with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a cognitive screening tool) score of 00 (scores of 0-7 suggests severe cognitive impairment, 8 to 12 suggests moderate cognitive impairment, and 13 to 15 suggests that cognition is intact), which indicate severe cognitive impairment.A review of Resident 3's POLST, undated, indicated that To be valid a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Residents 151) had the baseline care plan completed within 48 hours of admission. This failure had the potential for the facility staff not to meet the residents' immediate care needs and safety against adverse events that are most likely to occur right after admission. Findings: 1.Review of Resident 151's Face sheet (a summary document containing a Resident's personal and demographic information, including contact details and medical history) indicated Resident 151 was admitted on 9/5//25 with diagnoses including bradycardia (a slow heart rate), unspecified atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm ), thrombocytopenia [deficiency of platelets (a small colorless cell fragments in our blood that form clots and stop or prevent bleeding)] and, hypertension (when your blood consistent pushes too forcefully against artery walls forcing your heart to work harder). Review of Resident 151's Baseline care plan dated 9/23/25, indicated the health condition, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized, resident-centered care plan for two of two residents (Residents 20 and 3) with a sitter (a caregiver who provides companionship and supervision to patients who need constant observation or assistance, often due to medical conditions or behavioral issues that could pose a risk). This failure had the potential not to meet care needs appropriately for Residents 20 and 3. Findings: 1.Review of Resident 20's clinical record titled, admission Record, dated12/19/2025, indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia (a group of symptoms affecting thinking and social abilities interfering with daily functioning) with agitation (a state of anxiety, or restlessness, often making someone feel tense, irritable, and unable to relax), adult failure to thrive (a decline caused by chronic diseases and functional impairments which can cause weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enteral feeding (the delivery of nutrients through a feeding tube directly into the stomach) was provided with appropriate care and services when an enteral feeding was found to be running for more than 24 hours for one (Resident 13) out of 31 sampled residents.This failure had the potential to put Resident 13 at risk for enteral feeding complications such as tube clogging/displacement, fluid overload, abdominal distention and infections.During an observation on 12/16/25 at 9:22 a.m. at Resident 13's bedside, Resident 13 was on the bed with eyes closed and noted rise and fall of the chest. Resident 13 had an enteral feeding bottle with contents below 300 ml (milliliters, a unit of measurement) connected to a running feeding pump (a machine that uses a pump to control the flow, ensuring precise amounts are given over time, often using a bag of special liquid formula, tubing, and a small pump mechanism). The feeding bottle indicated it started on 12/15/25 at 1 a.m.A review of Resident 13's medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the daily staffing information was posted in a clear and readable format and in a prominent place readily accessible to residents, staff, and visitors. This failure had the potential to result in staffing misinformation for residents, families, and visitors.Findings:During multiple observations from 12/16/2025 to 12/19/2025, between 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m., at the lobby, nurse station AA (NS AA) and nurse station BB (NS BB), there was no daily staffing information posted. There was no daily staffing information placed on top of the lobby desk or on top of nurse stations AA and BB.During an observation on 12/22/2025 at 9:35 a.m., in the facility's lobby, there was no daily staffing information posted that could easily be seen by visitors or residents.During an observation on 12/22/2025 at 9:39 a.m., in NS AA, there was no daily staffing information posted that could easily be seen by visitors or residents.During a concurrent observation and interview with registered nurse C (RN C) on 12/22/2025 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate account of controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled when Clonazepam (medication used to prevent and treat anxiety disorders, and seizures) was dispensed but was not recorded in the Narcotics Record book for one (Resident 65) out of 31 sampled residents.This failure had the potential for diversion of controlled medications.During a concurrent observation and record review of Station 2 medication cart on 12/16/25 at 11:29 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) B, RN B verified Narcotics Record book indicated Resident 65 had 16 remaining Clonazepam pills dated 12/15/25 at 5:20 p.m. RN B also verified Clonazepam blister pack for Resident 65 had 15 pills.A review of Resident 65's physician order indicated Clonazepam 1 MG [milligram, a unit of measurement] give 1 tablet orally two times a day for anxiety m/b [manifested by] continuous yelling, screaming, calling outDuring an interview and record review of Resident 65's medication administration record on 12/18/25 at 2:07 p.m. with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 57 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure irregularities were identified during drug regimen review for the medication Lurasidone (an antipsychotic medication, works by rebalancing important natural substances in the brain called dopamine and serotonin to improve thinking, mood, and behavior) for one (Resident 17) out of 31 sampled residents when adequate monitoring for the medication was not done.This failure had the potential to compromise the physical, social, and mental well-being of Resident 17.A review of Resident 17's medical records indicated an admission date of 4/28/25. Resident 17's diagnoses included but were not limited to, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life, affecting memory, thinking, language, judgment, and behavior, often caused by nerve cells in the brain stopping working properly), and bipolar disorder (a mental health condition causing extreme mood swings,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage and labeling of medications when:1. Opened eyedrop medications without open and discard date labels, an eyedrop medication past discard date, and an opened Phenytoin Oral Suspension (a medication used for seizures) without open date label were found.2. Insulin pen without opened date label and an expired inhalation solution (medication used to keep airways open and to control and prevent symptoms like wheezing, shortness of breath, coughing and chest tightness) were found.3. Insulin pen without open and discard date was found.These failures had the potential for residents to receive medications with reduced efficacy.1. During a concurrent observation and interview regarding Station 5 Medication Cart on [DATE] at 10:04 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) A, the following were identified and verified by LVN A:a. A Latanoprost Eye Drop Medication indicated an open date label of [DATE] and without a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable. This failure places all residents who eats food from the facility's kitchen at risk for poor food intake which may compromise their nutritional status. Findings: 1) A review of Resident 8's medical record indicated he was initially admitted on [DATE]. Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/29/25, indicated he had a BIMS [Brief Interview for Mental Status] score of 15 - cognitively intact. Further review of the medical record indicated Resident 8 was on NAS (no added salt) regular diet. During an interview with Resident 8 on 12/16/2025 at 10:50 a.m., he stated that the facility does not know how to cook chicken. Resident 8 further described the texture of the chicken served at the facility as being [NAME] to rubber. During an observation and concurrent interview on 12/19/25 at 2:00 p.m., three surveyors, along with two Dietary Managers (DMs),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when:1.Housekeeper J (HK J ) did not wear the proper personal protective equipment (PPE - clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) when mopping inside a the room of cohorted (joined together) residents (Resident 62 and Resident 1) who were on contact precautions (extra steps, like wearing of gloves and gown, needed to stop the spread of germs by touch) and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, an infection control measures in nursing homes to stop the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs]), and did not perform hand hygiene upon exit of the room. Resident 62 was on contact precautions for C. Diff [Clostridium difficile, a common, often harmful bacterium that causes severe diarrhea and inflammation of the colon]) and Resident 1 was on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP). 2.Licensed vocational nurse I (LVN I) did not perform hand hygiene (cleaning of hands with soap and water or an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide services according to professional standards for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) crushed all of Resident 1's morning medications, mixed them with oatmeal, and left them at Resident 1's bedside; and 2. Certified nursing assistant B (CNA B) administered crushed medications, mixed with oatmeal to Resident 1. These failures had the potential to affect Resident 1's care, health, and well-being.Findings:1.Review of Resident 1's clinical record titled, admission Record, dated 9/25/2025, it indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including myocardial infarction (heart attack), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (a fast, irregular heartbeat that only lasts a few hours or days), chronic systolic heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), and hypertension (HTN - high blood pressure).Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 1) out of three sampled residents was provided needed care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice when Resident 1 did not receive urology (a medical specialty that focuses on the diagnosis and treatment of disorders related to the urinary and reproductive systems) consultation as ordered by the physician. This failure resulted in Resident 1's prolonged use of indwelling urinary catheter [thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder through the urethra to collect and drain urine] and placed Resident 1 at risk for urinary tract infection and delayed urology evaluation. Findings: A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated an admission date of 1/17/25 with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease (kidneys no longer work as they should to meet the body's needs), Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy, unspecified (urinary tract has a blockage that prevents urine from flowing normally and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care provided were in accordance with professional standards of practice when one (Resident 1) out of three sampled residents was left with their oral medication to be taken unsupervised at bedside and was documented as given without confirmation. This failure resulted in inaccurate documentation of correct time of medication administration and had the potential for a missed dose. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/17/24 at 11:39 a.m. with Resident 1 in her room, a medicine cup with two white capsules and a plastic cup of water were noted on her bedside table. Resident 1 stated that her nurse left it there for her to take. At 11:42 a.m., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B came in the room and verified the two capsules and stated she will call Resident 1's nurse. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) A came in the room at 11:45 a.m. and confirmed she was Resident 1's assigned nurse and that she left the medications for Resident 1. LVN A stated It's not okay to leave…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-17 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient and appropriate social services were provided for two (Resident 7 and Resident 10) out of 12 sampled residents when psychosocial and emotional assessments were not done following a resident-to-resident altercation. This failure had the potential for psychosocial decline of the residents that can affect their overall health. Findings: During an interview on 12/17/24 at 1:47 p.m. with the Social Services Director (SSD), the SSD stated it was her duty to check on residents involved in altercations. The SSD also stated she must check on the residents for three consecutive days after an alleged event except on weekends. The SSD stated, I usually ask them what happened and if they are in pain. I also ask them if they're sad. The SSD also stated the assessment must be documented on the resident's electronic chart. During a concurrent interview and record review with the SSD on 12/17/24 at 2:02 p.m. of Resident 10's and Resident 11's progress notes, the DSD verified Resident 10 had an alleged altercation with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0555 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff honored one of two residents (1) preferences when the social services assistant (SSA) did not assist Resident 1 to choose another physician. This failure had the potential to compromise resident rights. Review of Resident 1's admission Record (part of the medical record that documents patient information) indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis of the Spine (an inflammatory arthritis affecting the spine and large joints). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 8/12/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact (mental process used to think, learn, remember, reason, pay attention, and ultimately, comprehend information and turn it into knowledge). During an interview, on 9/11/24, at 11:30 a.m., with the SSA, SSA stated Resident 1 asked to switch physicians about two months ago. SSA stated she thought…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to obtain prescription eyeglasses for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1's impaired vision and had the potential to result in decreased participation in activities requiring visual acuity. Findings: A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment used to guide care), dated 5/25/24, indicated Resident 1 had clear speech, was able to understand and be understand by others, and had adequate vision with corrective lenses. During an interview on 7/1/24 at 1:00 p.m. with the Social Services Associate (SSA), the SSA stated referrals were sent to the eye doctor on 6/4/24, they will be in the facility to evaluate the Residents on 7/9/24. During an observation and concurrent interview on 7/1/24 at 2:09 p.m. Resident 1 was awake, lying in bed, he did not have his eyeglasses, he stated, my glasses were taken by someone here, no one will help me make an appointment. During an observation and concurrent interview on 7/22/24 at 2:05 p.m. in Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their elopement care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in another incident of Resident 1's elopement to unsafe place. Findings: Review of Resident 1's face sheet (summary page of a patient's important information) dated 8/2/2024, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and mental functions), dementia (a group of symptoms affecting thinking and social abilities interfering with daily functioning) with mood disturbance and history of falling. Review Resident 1's Elopement (to leave without notification or permission) Evaluation, dated 3/28/2024, indicated a score of 5 (Score value of 1 or higher indicates Risk of Elopement). Review of Resident 1's minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) quarterly assessment, dated 6/28/2024, indicated, Resident 1 had memory problems with short term and long-term memory. Further review indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from abuse when the two residents were not separated after the incident. This failure resulted in Resident 1 was feeling terrified and was not able to sleep after the incident. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) dated 5/24/24, it indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of aftercare following joint replacement surgery due to displaced right patella (kneecap) fracture. During an interview on 3/13/24 at 3:10 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated on the first night after he was admitted to the facility, his roommate (Resident 2) grabbed his left leg, the facility staff did not separate the two of them after incident, he was not able to sleep and stayed up all night, because he was terrified. Resident 2 grabbed his leg again the next morning, the facility did not move Resident 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement strategies to prevent the spread of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19, a strain of virus that can cause mild to severe respiratory illness) when one of one resident (Resident 3) was not isolated after testing positive for COVID-19. This failure had the potential to result in the spread of COVID-19 in the facility. Findings: During an interview on 3/13/24 at 3:10 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated there was a COVID positive resident who ran out of the room and went into the rehab gym over the weekend. One of the rehab staff was mad that staff let that resident came out of the room. During an interview on 3/13/24 at 3:33 p.m. with Occupational Therapist (OT) A, OT A stated Resident 3 came out of the room without a mask, went into the rehab gym, and staff had to ask her to put on a mask and she got escorted back to her room. During an interview on 3/13/24 at 3:45 p.m. with Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) B, PTA B stated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to date open food items and properly store dry food in sealed containers. These deficient practices affected all residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings included: A policy titled Food Storage, revised on 07/25/2019, revealed, Purpose To establish guidelines for storing, thawing, and preparing food. Policy Food items will be stored thawed, and prepared in accordance with good sanitary practice. All items will be correctly labeled and dated. Per the policy, D. Label and date all food items. The policy specified, G. Any opened products should be placed in storage containers with tight fitting lids. During an observation on 05/27/2024 at 8:39 AM, the surveyor noted in the walk-in refrigerator plastic storage container dated 05/10/2024 through 05/17/2024, of bell peppers that had a black fuzzy substance on them and a fluid seeping out of the container and two undated bags of cheese. In the walk-in freezer, there was an undated bag of diced ham that was opened to air. In the dry storage area,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate for 3 (Residents #50, #65, and #159) of 33 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #50 on 07/30/2016. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and major depressive disorder. An annual MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/23/2023, revealed Resident #50 was not considered by the state level II preadmission screening and resident review process to have a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. A letter from the State of California-Health and Human Services Agency Department of Health Care Services, dated 09/23/2022, revealed a level II evaluation was conducted on 08/12/2022 and specialized services were recommended. 2. An admission Record revealed the facility readmitted Resident #65…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address the yelling behavior for 1 (Resident #17) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for behavior emotional. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning, revised in 11/2028, specified, Purpose To ensure that a comprehensive person centered care plan is developed for each resident. The policy revealed, Additional changes or updates to the resident's comprehensive care plan will be made based on the assessed needs of the resident. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #17 on 12/20/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment, schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/28/2024, revealed Resident #17 had a Staff Assessment for Mental Status, which indicated the resident was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for 2 (Resident #20 and Resident #93) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings included: A facility policy titled, Grooming Care of the Fingernails and Toenails, revised on 10/21/2021, revealed, Purpose Nail care is given to clean the nail bed and keep the nails trimmed. Policy Fingernails are trimmed by Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), except for Residents with diabetes or circulatory impairments, this includes all toenails except for high-risk Residents. Note: A Licensed Nurse will trim those Residents' nails. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #20 on 04/27/2015. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of contracture of left elbow, wrist, and hand and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/12/2024, revealed Resident #20 had a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a root cause was determined for a fall for 1 (Resident #62) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Fall Management Program, revised on 03/13/2021, specified Purpose To provide residents a safe environment that minimizes complications associated with falls, The policy specified, The IDT [Interdisciplinary team] will review the circumstance surrounding the fall then summarize their conclusions on an IDT note. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #62 on 10/19/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of adult failure to thrive, dementia, altered mental status, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and weakness. A significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/27/2024, revealed Resident #62 had a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS), which indicated the resident was severely impaired in cognitive skills for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an enteral gastrostomy tube feeding was administered as ordered for 1 (Resident #113) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for tube feeding. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Enteral Feeding, revised on 01/01/2012, specified, Enteral feeding will be administered via pump as ordered by the Attending Physician. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #113 on 04/09/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of gastrostomy status and adult failure to thrive. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/16/2024, revealed Resident #113 had a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS), which indicated the resident was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS revealed the resident had a feeding tube and received 51% or more of their total calories by way of a tube feeding. Resident #113's care plan, initiated on 04/10/2024 and revised on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a therapeutic diet were served to 1 (Resident #71) of 33 sampled residents as ordered by the physician. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Therapeutic Diets, revised on 06/01/2024, revealed, Therapeutic diets are diets that deviate from the regular diet and require a physician order. Procedure I. Therapeutic diets will not be given without a physician order. A. The nursing staff is responsible for communicating the physician's order for a therapeutic diet to the dietary department in writing. B. The therapeutic diet will be reflected on the resident's tray card. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #71 on 01/25/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and dysphagia. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 05/03/2024, revealed Resident #71 had a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS), which indicated the resident was severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented during indwelling catheter care for 1 (Resident #12) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for urinary catheter. Findings included: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid [CMS] Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Quality, Safety & Oversight Group, memorandum dated 03/20/2024 with an effective date of 04/01/2024, revealed CMS is issuing new guidance for State Survey Agencies and long term care (LTC) facilities on the use of enhanced barrier precautions to align with nationally accepted standards. EBP recommendations now include use of EBP for residents with chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices during high-contact resident care activities regardless of their multidrug-resistant organism status. A facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised on 04/30/2024, revealed, 7. For residents for whom EBP are indicated, EBP is employed when performing the following high-contact resident care activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications when nursing staff did not accurately transcribe (transfer or copy information) from the physician's order to the medication administration record (MAR) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, an order for milk of magnesia (MOM, a laxative used to treat constipation) was incorrectly transcribed onto the MAR and was administered daily instead of every third day. This failure resulted in Resident 1 receiving unnecessary doses of MOM and had the potential to compromise Resident 1's health and safety due to overuse. Review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (document that contains a summary of personal and demographic information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure (inability of the respiratory system to meet oxygenation requirements) and hypoxia (low levels of oxygen). Review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure routine medication was available for one of two sampled resident (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving the medication which could lead to adverse effects on the health and well being of Resident 1. Findings: Review of Resident 1's face sheet (FS: a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 1 admitted to facility on 1/28/2020. Resident 1's admission diagnoses included diabetes type 2 (high levels of sugar in blood), anxiety (excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations), and nasal congestion (a stuffy or congested nose occurs when the tissue lining it becomes swollen). Review of Resident 1's physician order dated 2/16/2024, indicated, Fluticasone Propionate (medication to treat allergy symptoms like sneezing, itching and a runny or stuffy nose) Allergy Relief Nasal Suspension 1 spray (liquid medication to spray) on both nostrils (two holes in nose) one time a day for treat Nasal Congestion . During an interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow professional standards of care when a Braden Scale assessment for pressure ulcer/injury (localized damaged to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence) was not performed until after a resident developed a pressure ulcer for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) This failure had the potential of not thoroughly assessing the resident ' s risks and in not developing pertinent preventative measures. Findings: Review of Resident 1 ' s record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility in July 2023 and there was no Braden Scale – Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk Evaluation until 9/28/23. Review of Resident 1 ' s Change in Condition Evaluation form, dated 9/17/23 at 10:03 p.m., indicated the resident had an open wound to his left lateral ankle. The interdisciplinary team (IDT, health care team members who meet to discuss and plan residents ' care) Progress Note, dated 9/21/23 6:14 p.m., described the wound as a Stage 3 (full-thickness loss of skin in which fat is visible in the ulcer)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-07 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policies regarding protecting resident's personal property for two of three residents (Resident 1 and 2) when: 1. Resident 1's personal property was not stored securely when the resident was transferred to the hospital. Resident 1's missing personal property was reported and the facility did not take corrective action in a timely manner. 2. Resident 2's Inventory of Personal Effects was not signed when the resident was discharged . These failures resulted in Resident 1's missing cell phone and had the potential to result in personal belongings not accounted for. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of rectum (cancerous tumor of the end of the colon) and sepsis (a life-threatening complication from infection which could result in organ failure). Review of Resident 1's Inventory List, dated 8/25/23 indicated an iPhone 7 plus was on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide necessary treatment for one of three residents (Resident 1) when wound dressing changes (treatments) for Resident 1 was not done for three days and wound dressing changes were not ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to result in infection, delayed wound healing, and other health complications for the resident. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of rectum (cancerous tumor of the end of the colon) and sepsis (a life-threatening complication from infection which could result in organ failure). It also indicated she had wounds on her right lateral breast and right chest. Review of Resident 1's Change in Condition Evaluation, dated 8/18/23 indicated Resident 1 was sent out to the hospital on 8/18/23 for shortness of breath. Review of Resident 1's Interfacility Transfer Report, dated 8/25/23 indicated Resident 1 returned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure transportation services was provided to scheduled dialysis (a treatment to remove extra fluid and waste in the blood) appointments for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 missed two dialysis treatments for lack of transportation. This failure resulted Resident 1's transfer to emergency room (ER) for dialysis. Findings: During an interview on 8/2/23 at 1:44 p.m. with current transportation personnel, she stated she confirmed with dialysis facility nurse that Resident 1's last dialysis appointment was on 7/5/23; and that, Resident 1 missed dialysis appointments on 7/7/23 and 7/10/23 due to transportation issues. During an interview on 8/2/23 at 2:10 p.m. with the Unit Manager (UM) B, she stated if a resident missed an appointment due to transportation issues, the transportation personnel was responsible to rearrange the transportation. During an interview on 8/2/23 at 3:00 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) C, she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-05 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, the facility failed to notify the responsible party (RP, person designated to make decisions on behalf of a resident) of a resident about a change in medication for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure affected the ability of Resident 1's RP to participate in Resident 1's treatment. Findings: During a phone interview on 7/5/23 at 9:24 a.m. with Resident 1's RP, she stated, the facility did not notify her of Resident 1's Lorazepam (a medication used for anxiety) order was changed. During a review of Resident 1's Physician Orders, dated 12/22/21, an order indicated, give Lorazepam 0.5mg by mouth three times a day. This order was discontinued on 6/13/23. During a review of Resident 1's Physician Orders, dated 6/13/23, the order indicated, give Lorazepam 0.5mg by mouth at bedtime. During a concurrent interview and record review with the Unit Manager (UM) A on 7/26/23 at 3:18 p.m., Resident 1's Nursing Progress Notes, dated 6/2023, was reviewed. There was no documented evidence that indicated Resident 1's RP was notified for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-07-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain order and cleanliness in the kitchen area and to ensure that food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions when: 1. The kitchen environment was not cleaned and orderly; dry food containers and storage were dirty; 2. There were opened, undated and expired food and drinks in the freezer and walk-in refrigerator; unlabeled and undated food in the residents' refrigerator; 3. Kitchen utensils (7 water pitchers and 2 measuring cups) were not air-dried properly; 4. Proper cooling procedures were not observed for the tuna and egg salad; and 5. Med pass supplement was held in room temperature for an extended period of time. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness to 130 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During an initial kitchen observation on 7/19/21, at 8:30 a.m., the surveyors observed the following: 1) a mop head on the floor under the stove; 2) a blanket on the floor under the two door refrigerator adjacent to handwashing sink; 3) a dirty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain residents' privacy and dignity for eight out of 26 residents (Residents 36, 39, 41, 46, 92, 109, 124, and 327) when: 1. For Resident 92, privacy curtains were not provided by the restorative nurse assistant DD (RNA DD) during care, which resulted in exposing the resident from the waist down to the public view in the hallway; 2. For Resident 46, certified nursing assistant EE (CNA EE) was standing while assisting Resident 46 with her meal and calling her mama; 3. For Resident 109, licensed vocational nurse FF (LVN FF) called Resident 109 love and Resident 109 became upset; 4. For Resident 41, CNA GG called Resident 41 mama and honey when assisting with her meal; 5. For Resident 39, LVN Q called Resident 39 mama during wound treatment; 6. For Resident 124, a privacy curtain was not provided and the resident's body was exposed to public view in the hallway; 7. For Resident 36, CNA N was standing when assisting Resident 36 with his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, orderly, and sanitary homelike environment for three of five facility shower rooms. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for injuries and prevent their rights to a comfortable environment. 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Maintenance Director (MD), on 7/21/21, at 3:09 p.m. in station 2, the shower room walls had irregularly shaped gray spots and open holes. The MD stated the building was old and the wall was damaged by constant splashing of water during showers. He acknowledged the wall needed to be replaced and repaired immediately. The MD confirmed the wall did not look good and it may possibly cause accidents because the open holes were located at the lower corner of the wall. 2. During a concurrent observation and interview with the MD, on 7/21/21, at 3:21 p.m. in station 3, the shower room had four wheelchairs, two walkers, two commodes (a chair or bench that has a cutout positioned over a removable pan), one large trash bin and one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and procedure for five out of seven residents (Residents 7, 57,64,78, and 118) reviewed when: 1. Corrective action to not assign male caregivers and care plan for Resident 7 were not implemented; 2. For Resident 57, social services did not conduct three daily visits following an abuse allegation as indicated in the care plan; 3. For Residents 64 and 118, social services did not do psycho-social follow-up after the incident; 4. For Resident 78, licensed nurses did not implement Resident 78's care plan following an abuse allegation These failures had the potential to affect the resident's psychosocial well-being, safety and protection from harm. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 7's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (persistent loss of interest in activities) and brief psychotic disorder (sudden onset of psychotic [severe mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for five of 26 sampled residents (Residents 22, 120, 11, 98 , and 57) when: 1. For Resident 22, facility staff failed to ensure oxygen (a colorless and odorless gas that people need to breath) was administered as specified in the physician's order; 2. For Resident 120, facility staff continued to provide restorative nursing treatment without a physician order and did not follow a physician order to monitor Resident 120's left hand swelling; 3. For Resident 11, facility staff failed to address nail care; 4. For Resident 98, facility staff failed to check the functioning of his low air loss mattress (LAL mattress, special mattress filled with air that reduces pressure) as indicated in the physician's order; and 5. For Resident 57, facility staff failed to provide treatment for his legs as indicated in the physician's order. These failures had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving dialysis (removal of waste and excess fluid from the body) treatment received care consistent with professional standards for three out of four residents (Residents 6,7 and 81) reviewed when: 1. For Resident 6, his dialysis communication records (DCR) were incomplete and his physician order, treatment administration record (TAR) did not reflect his current dialysis access site; 2. For Resident 7, her DCR's were incomplete and her care plan did not reflect the dialysis access site and necessary precautions and; 3. For Resident 81, his DCR's were incomplete. These deficient practices had the potential for the residents to be inadequately assessed and be at risk for complications. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 6's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease (gradual loss of kidney function). During an interview with Resident 6 on 7/19/21, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 29.03% when nine medication errors occurred out of 31 opportunities during medication administration for five out of seven residents (Residents 29, 40, 57, 117, and 123). The deficient practice resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders and/or manufacturer's specifications, which resulted in residents not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medications, and may cause preventable side effects for the residents. Findings: 1. During the medication pass observation on 7/19/21 at 9:21 a.m., with licensed vocational nurse (LVN) B, he administered 8 medications to Resident 57 including 3 tablets of diclofenac (a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, or NSAID, for pain) 25 millligrams (mg; total 75 mg) and 1 capsule of omeprazole 20 mg (medication to prevent heartburn). Resident 57 took his medications with water. There was no food, snack, or milk offered to the resident with his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 26 sampled residents (Residents 29 and 82) and one resident (Resident 123) were free of significant medication errors. Resident 123 did not receive his pain medication when needed. Resident 29 did not receive his daily sevelamer (a phosphate binder, medication to control high blood level of phosphorus, a mineral found in food, in people with kidney disease who are on dialysis) for more than two months. Resident 82 did not receive his inhalers (to treat breathing problems), Xifaxan (medication to help prevent recurrence of certain liver problems), and gabapentin (nerve pain medication) as ordered. The failures resulted in medications not available to meet the residents' therapeutic needs, and the potential for unnecessary pain and worsening of their medical conditions. Findings: 1. During the medication pass observation with licensed vocational nurse (LVN) B on 7/19/21 at 9:45 a.m., Resident 123 was in a wheelchair outside in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage and labeling of medications when: 1. Temperature monitoring was not documented consistently on the temperature log sheets, in July 2021, for four out of four medication refrigerators; 2. Four inhalers were not dated after being opened; 3. Three insulin vials were identified in the active stock, being used beyond the discard (expiration) date; and 4. A non-prescription medication was not properly labeled. The deficient practices had the potential for unsafe and ineffective use of medications due to being unmonitored or used past the expiration date. Findings: 1. During an inspection of the facility's Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] on 7/19/21 at 10:31 a.m. with licensed vocational nurse (LVN) Q, it was observed the medication refrigerator temperature log for July 2021 was incomplete. The staff did not document the temperature monitoring during the 6 a.m. and 6 p.m. five days during this month. LVN Q verified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-26 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient staff to safely and effectively perform the meal preparation and other food and nutrition services for two of 26 sampled residents (Residents 31 and 74) and three residents (Residents 427, 327, and 27). This failure affect the residents' scheduled meal times and had the potential to affect the resident's intake. Findings: During a kitchen observation on 7/19/21 at 8:30 a.m., the dietary manager (DM) worked on the trayline. On 7/21/21 at 9:30 a.m., it was the dietary cook's regular off schedule and DM performed the dietary cooks duties. During an observation on 7/20/21 at 1:30 p.m, the test tray was plated and the tray cart was removed from the kitchen to be served to Station 2 residents. The facility staff distributed the last meal tray to the residents at 2:02 p.m. During an observation and concurrent interview with the regional registered dietitian (RRD) on 7/20/21 at 2:05 p.m., the surveyor and RRD checked the food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee failed to implement and evaluate systemic measures to ensure oversight of the following: 1. Pharmacy Services (Refer to F760 Residents Are Free of Significant Med Errors and F755 Pharmacy Services) 2 Dialysis (Refer to F698) This failure had the potential to negatively affect the improvement of the residents' quality of care, quality of life and safety in a highly susceptible population of 130 residents. Findings : During a concurrent interview and record review with the administrator (ADM), on 7/26/21 at 1:36 p.m., the ADM stated the QAPI committee included herself, the medical director (MD), director of nursing (DON), assistant director of nursing (ADON), and the facility's department heads. The ADM further stated they meet once a month. During further interview with the ADM on 7/26/21, the systemic issues identified during the survey process were discussed. The issues included medication administration practices by the nursing department, pharmacy services and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: 1. Staff did not properly wear N95 (a high filtering mask); 2. Rehab staff wore cloth mask as source control; 3. Licensed vocational nurse J (LVN J) wore two pairs of gloves (double gloving) and did not perform hand hygiene in between tasks; 4. Medication and treatment carts' sharps containers were full; 5. LVN BB went in and out of the room wearing a gown in the yellow zone (quarantine unit), applied wound treatment gel using her gloved index finger and did not perform hand hygiene in between tasks; 6. LVN G was wearing KN95 (a respirator that does not meet the US standard) in the yellow zone; 7. LVN Q did not perform hand hygiene in between tasks, and did not wear N95 properly; 8. Rehabilitation staff (RS CC) used hand wipes to clean medical equipment; 9. Visiting dentist was wearing a gown in the yellow zone hallway. 10.Certified nursing assistant HH (CNA HH) did not perform hand hygiene in between tasks. These failures could result in the spread of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain two clothes dryer lint traps, power generator, resident refrigerator, and kitchen equipment in safe operating condition. These failures could affect the health, safety, and comfort of all residents, staff, and visitors in the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with the housekeeping supervisor (HS), on 7/23/21 at 8:59 p.m. in laundry room, two clothes dryer lint traps (a device acts as an in line lint filter in the dryer's exhaust pipe) had thick accumulation of fibers that shed off clothing and linens. The HS stated he was expecting the lint traps to be cleaned every two hours because a clogged lint trap decreases the dryer's performance. During a concurrent interview and record review with the laundry staff (LS) on 7/23/21 at 9:10 a.m., the lint trap cleaning log indicated it was not signed off at the start of the shift. The LS stated she was not sure if the staff bypassed the lint cleaning or did not clean it at all. She acknowledged the lint trap should be cleaned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment when cracks and crevices where identified in the kitchen area, and a bed mattress was in the hallway for four days. These failures could affect the health and safety of the residents and staff in the facility. Findings: It is the standard of practice to ensure floors, floor coverings, walls, wall coverings, and ceilings shall be designed, constructed, and installed so they are smooth and easily cleanable. Similarly in food establishments in which cleaning methods other than water flushing are used for cleaning floors, the floor and wall junctures shall be coved and closed to no larger than one thirty-second inch (Food Code, 2019). During a kitchen area observation on 7/20/21, at 10:09 a.m., it was noted there were multiple cracks and crevices throughout the kitchen area. As an example, in front of the cook's refrigerator, adjacent to the stove, the flooring was disintegrated in multiple areas, exposing the subflooring underneath. Similarly, in the area underneath the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was free of pests (flies and fruit flies), and the use of an open bait mouse traps in the kitchen area. These failures has the potential to spread infectious disease to the residents in the facility. Findings: Rodent bait shall be contained in a covered, tamper-resistant bait station (Food Code, 2019). During multiple kitchen observations on 7/19/21, from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., surveyors observed flies and fruit flies in the kitchen area. The screen was found to have a 1/2 to 1 1/2 gap, even when the door was latched. Also observed the air curtain for flies, adjacent to the coffee machine, was off on 7/19, 7/20 and 7/21. During an interview with the dietary manager (DM), on 7/20/21, at 9:53 a.m., DM said the air curtain on the back door should be on and that there is an on-off switch near the screen door.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-26 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform Family Member I (FM 1) for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 124) when he tested positive for Coronavirus disease (COVID-19, a disease caused by a new strain of coronavirus). This deficient practice resulted in FM 1 being unaware of Resident 124's health condition and was not able to participate in his care and treatment. During a telephone interview with Resident 124's FM 1 on 7/23/21 at 9:31 a.m., she stated the facility did not inform her when Resident 124 tested positive for COVID-19 December, 2020. She only came to know the COVID-19 test result information after Resident 124 was hospitalized the following month. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 124 and concurrent interview with Infection Preventionist (IP, a person responsible for the facility's activities aimed at preventing healthcare-associated infections) on 7/26/21 at 8:26 a.m., the nursing progress notes and facility's COVID-19 Communication Log to Responsible Party indicated no communication to Resident 124's FM 1 was made. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (person who routinely visits the facility and advocates for the residents) for two of four sampled residents (Residents 75 and 33) when Residents 75 and 33 were transferred to the acute care hospital. This failure had the potential to result in the residents not having an advocate who could inform them of their admission, transfer and discharge rights and options. Findings: Review of Resident 75's face sheet (document that summarizes a resident's information) indicated she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an interview and concurrent record review with the minimum data set nurse (MDSN) on 7/22/21 at 9:54 a.m., MDSN stated Resident 75 was discharged to the acute hospital on 3/26/21 and returned to the facility on 3/29/21. Review of Resident 33's face sheet indicated she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an interview and concurrent record review with the MDSN on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of bed hold (written documentation specifying the duration the facility will hold a resident's bed) for two residents (117 and 125). This failure had the potential to result in residents not being able to exercise their rights. Findings: 1. During an interview with Resident 117 on 7/26/21 at 2:04 p.m., she stated she was sent to the hospital in June 2021 due to unbearable pain and the facility staff did not provide a letter or notification about the bed hold. Review of Resident 117's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 4/21/21 indicated her cognition was intact. Review of Resident 117's situation, background, assessment, recommendation (SBAR, a tool used to communicate information to the resident's doctor) dated 6/20/21 at 2:31 p.m., indicated Resident 117 had unbearable right knee pain and did not indicate the Resident 117 was given a written form of bed hold notice. Review of Resident 117's physician order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) in minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) for two of 26 sampled residents (Residents 117 and 125). This was when Resident 125 had significant weight loss, had declined in activities of daily living (ADL, daily self-care tasks, e.g., bathing, toileting, and transferring); and Resident 117 had declined in activities of daily living and new onset of diagnosis. These failures had the potential to result in Residents 117 and 125 to be unable to achieve or maintain optimal status of health, function and quality of life. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 125's face sheet (summary page of a resident's important information) indicated she was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing), major depressive disorder (mood disorder that interferes with daily life) and diabetes mellitus type 2 (chronic condition that affects the way the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and accurately assess the preadmission screening and resident review report (PASRR, an evaluation data requirement to determine whether a resident with mental illness (MI) requires specialized services such as referral to a mental health authority) for two of 26 sampled residents (Residents 71 and 125). This failure had the potential to put the residents at risk for not receiving appropriate care and services. Findings: Review of Resident 71's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder (mental illness which a person can experience mood swings [period of overly happy or periods of feeling sad) anxiety disorder (feelings of worry and fears) and liver cell carcinoma (a type of liver cancer). Additional review of Resident 71's clinical record indicated he was admitted to hospice (specialized care) on 6/17/21. During a concurrent interview and record review with licensed vocational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to meet the needs and interests for two of 26 sampled residents (Residents 47 and 124). This deficient practice had the potential to affect the resident's psychosocial well-being and self-worth. 1. During an observation on 7/19/21 at 8:38 a.m. in station 5, Resident 47 was sitting on her wheelchair in her room in front of an overhead table. She was alert and verbally responsive and able to engage in simple conversation. She stated she had nothing to do but just to sit in her wheelchair for most of the time. On 7/19/21 at 2:45 p.m., Resident 47 was lying in bed but awake. The television was off and no radio was available. She stated she would prefer to be up and doing something rather than lying in bed. During an interview with certified nursing assistant I (CNA I) on 7/19/21 at 3:15 p.m., he stated he noticed Resident 47 received very little activities from the activity staff. The nursing staff would provide most of the interactions such as turning on the TV or offering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to prevent decline in range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 34) when staff did not implement Resident 34's care plan to address contractures (shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) and the facility failed to develop restorative nursing assistant (RNA) services (a program intended to maintain or improve physical function of the body) care plan (it provides direction on the type of nursing care the individual may need) for Residents 31 and 113. These failures had the potential to result in worsening of Resident 34 contractures and had the potential to result in not meeting Residents 31 and 113's needs. Findings : 1. Review of Resident 34's face sheet indicate he was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses of contracture to right hand. Review of Resident 34's activity of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist (CP) identified irregularities and make recommendations to the facility during the monthly drug regimen review (DRR); and the CP's recommendations were carried out or had the clinical rationale for not attempting the gradual dose reduction (GDR), for five of 26 sampled residents (Residents 29,31, 57, 82 and 98). This failure had the potential for medications not being optimized for best possible health outcome, and unnecessary or prolonged use of medications which could lead to medication adverse effects for the residents. Findings: 1. During the medication pass observation on 7/19/21 at 9:21 a.m., with licensed vocational nurse (LVN) B, he was administered eight medications to Resident 57 including a capsule of omeprazole 20 mg (medication to prevent heartburn). A review of the pharmacy label for omeprazole indicated, TAKE 1 CAPSULE BY MOUTH 2 TIMES A DAY BEFORE MEALS. On 7/19/21, a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 29) was free from unnecessary medications. Resident 29 received two medications, vitamin C (a dietary supplement) and zinc sulfate (dietary supplement to treat zinc deficiency) 30 days longer than ordered by the physician. This deficient practice resulted in unnecessary medications for the resident. Findings: A review of Resident 29's clinical record indicated that he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease (a longstanding kidney disease) and major depressive disorder (a mental disorder characterized by loss of pleasure or interest in life). His physician's orders included an order, dated 4/30/21, for vitamin C, 250 mg tablet, 1 tablet once daily x 30 days for supplement. He also had an order, dated 4/30/21, for zinc sulfate, 50 mg tablet, 1 tablet daily x 30 days for supplement. A review of the resident's June 21 Medication Administration Record indicated the nursing staff administered the vitamin C and zinc sulfate daily from 6/1 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 82) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors). Resident 82 received Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) without an adequate indication for use. The failure resulted in unnecessary medication for the resident, which had the potential for increased risks associated with psychotropic medication use that include but not limited to sedation, respiratory depression, falls, constipation, anxiety, agitation, abnormal involuntary movements, and memory loss. Findings: On 7/23/21, a review of Resident 82's clinical record indicated he was an elderly resident admitted to the facility with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a condition characterized by memory loss) without behavioral disturbance and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility menus for three residents (Residents 60, 73, 328). This failure could affect the nutritional status of the residents. Findings: During a tray line observation and review in the kitchen on 07/19/21, at 2:26 p.m., Resident 60's meal card indicated small portion. Resident 60 received one sandwich roll on his tray. Per the menu spreadsheet, one sandwich roll was a regular or large portion. Resident should have received only 1/2 sandwich roll. During the same tray line observation and review, Resident 73's meal card indicated puree regular CHHO. Resident 73 received 1/2 cup of mashed potato. Per menu spreadsheet, 1/2 cup mashed potato was a large portion. Resident 73 should have received 1/4 cup of mashed potato for a regular portion. During the same tray line observation, Resident 328 meal card, indicated resident request large portion CCHO (Controlled Carbohydrate). Resident 328 received regular serving of french fries plus additional fries on his tray. Menu spreadsheet indicated 1/2 cup…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dumpster lid was kept closed and the garbage was properly disposed in the trash area. This failure had the potential to attract pests in the facility. Findings: Outside receptacles must be constructed with tight-fitting lids or covers to prevent the scattering of the garbage or refuse by birds, the breeding of flies, or the entry of rodents. Proper equipment and supplies must be made available to accomplish thorough and proper cleaning of garbage storage areas and receptacles so that unsanitary conditions can be eliminated (Food Code Annex, 2019). During an observation on 07/20/21 09:00 a.m., while in the back of the facility, surveyors observed the dumpster lid was open. The trash area was not clean and cardboard, plastics, a chair, and empty boxes were scattered around the area. Review of the facility's policy, dated 1/1/2012, titled Pest Control, indicated, Garbage and trash are not permitted to accumulate in any part of the facility.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate use of antibiotic (medication for infection) for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 25 and 123) when the surveillance data collection form was incomplete and/or not done. This failure had the potential for the resident to take unnecessary antibiotics which could lead to resistance to the antibiotic. Findings: Review of Resident 25's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including calculus of the kidney with calculus of ureter (stone in the kidney). Review of Resident 25's physician's order dated 7/16/21 indicated macrobid (an antibiotic to prevent or treat urinary tract infections) 100 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) one cap twice a day for 10 days. Review of Resident 123's physician order dated 7/23/21 indicated macrobid 100 mg twice a day for five days for UTI (urinary tract infection). Review of Resident 123's Surveillance Data Collection Form dated 7/23/21, did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five residents (36 and 81) were offered and/or received pneumococcal vaccinations. This failure had the potential to expose residents to pneumococcal infections (caused by common bacteria [streptococcus pneumonia] that can affect different parts of the body). Findings: Review of Resident 36's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Pneumococcal Vaccination, Informed Consent or refusal indicated the resident refused the vaccine on 12/19/19, but did not indicate the reason of the refusal. Review of Resident 81's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an interview with the assistant director of nursing (ADON) on 7/26/21 at 2:35 p.m., the ADON stated the facility could not find when was the last time Residents 36 and 81 received the pneumococcal vaccine. Review of the facility's undated policy, Pneumococcal Disease Prevention indicated the facility will offer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SOL HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOL HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 99% | since 02/04/2010 |
| MAJER, SOL | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/04/2010 |
| EAST TERRACE-LET LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/04/2010 |
| ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/04/2010 |
| HADFIELD, KEVIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/16/2024 |
| HAGGERTY, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055407. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.