San Jose Healthcare & Wellness Center
75 N. 13th Street, San Jose, CA 95112 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 58 certified beds · (408) 295-2665 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.4% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.6% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 0.8% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.4% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.5% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.69 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.78 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 88 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 70.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.1%CMS range 44.4–61.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.9%CMS range 8.2–17.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 70.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 60.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 63.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.9%CMS range 5.1–14.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 51.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.73 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure to transfer the resident's body to the referred mortuary (a funeral home, where dead bodies are kept before burial or cremation) within four hours after Resident 1 expired at the facility. This failure has caused significant emotional distress for three of three sampled residents (Resident 2, 3, and 4). Findings: Review of Resident 1's undated face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to facility on 7/28/2023 with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure (a condition in which the respiratory system is unable to provide an adequate supply of oxygen or to remove carbon dioxide efficiently), adult failure to thrive (a condition with weight loss, poor nutrition, and decreased activity), hepatitis c (a viral infection that affects the liver), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and communicate which licensed nurse was responsible for providing care to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) on the evening shift (3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.) of 4/9/25. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving scheduled medications in a timely manner, and had the potential to result in other care needs not being met. Findings: Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including, but not limited to dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), hypertensive heart disease (a heart condition that develops from chronic high blood pressure), and heart failure (a condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should). Review of Resident 1's medication administration record (MAR), dated 4/2025, indicated Resident 1 was scheduled to receive the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper use of side or bed rails (adjustable rigid bars attached to the side of a bed) for six of 11 residents (31, 33, 35, 37, 42, and 49) when: 1. Residents 31, 33, and 35 did not have care plan for siderails; 2. Residents 42 and 49 did not have a physician's order for the use of siderails and care plan for siderails; and 3. Resident 37 did not have a consent and a physician's order for the use of siderails, and care plan for siderails. These failures had the potential to place the residents at risk of entrapment and injury. Findings: During an observation on 3/4/25 at 11:47 a.m., Residents 31, 33, 35, 37, 42, and 49 had bilateral siderails. Review of Residents 31, 33, and 35's clinical records indicated Residents 31, 33, and 35 did not have care plan for siderails. Review of Residents 42 and 49's clinical records indicated Residents 42 and 49 did not have a physician's order for the use of siderails and care plan for siderails. Review of Resident 37's clinical record indicated Resident 37 did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff competently carried out the functions of the food and nutrition services department according to facility policy and standards of practice when kitchen staff did not correctly demonstrate how to test the dish machine sanitizer. This failure had the potential to place 51 residents who consumed food from the kitchen at risk for exposure to contaminants in food that may lead to food borne illness. Findings: During a kitchen observation and interview on 3/4/25 at 1:09 p.m. with the Registered Dietician (RD), Dietary Manager (DM), and Dietary [NAME] (DC), DC tested the sanitizer of the facility dish machine. DC took a test strip and dipped it in the water that came out of the dish machine after a cycle. The test strip turned purple and DC compared it to the test strip container. The RD and DM stated this was how they test the sanitizer. During an interview on 3/5/25 at 10:41 a.m. with dish machine vendor technician specialist (TS), TS stated, the correct way to test the dish machine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen for food preparation equipment and food storage methods, according to standards of practice and facility policy when: 1. Foods were stored unlabeled and/or past used-by date; and 2. Sink drainage pipe with buildup within the inner lining. These failures had the potential for food contamination, resulting in food borne illnesses for 51 residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour observation and interview on 3/3/25 at 8:51 a.m., with the Registered Dietician (RD), the sink faucet was dripping and drainage pipe with an air gap was dirty with accumulation of whitish to yellowish build up around the inner lining. The outer part of the pipe had whitish substance in drip patterns. During an observation and interview in the kitchen on 3/4/25 at 1:00 p.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM), the DM confirmed the state of the dirty sink drainage pipe and stated that the DM is the cleaner for the drainage pipe, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper infection control procedures when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse D (LVN D) did not wash or sanitize hands before checking Resident 21's vital signs (blood pressure [BP], pulse, and oxygen saturation [SpO2], which measures the amount of oxygen in the blood); 2. Certified nursing assistant C (CNA C) did not wash or sanitize her hands before feeding Resident 40; licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) and registered nurse F (RN F) did not wash or sanitize their hands before opening the plate lids to check the residents' meals on the meal tray; and 3. Licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) did not clean the used scissors before cutting the granufoam dressing (designed to adapt to irregular wound contours) and the vacuum assisted closure tape for Resident 31's wound. These failures had the potential to increase the risk of spreading infections in the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation and concurrent with interview on 3/4/25, at 3:53 p.m., LVN D was observed pushing a portable vital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat the residents with dignity for one of 14 residents (31) when licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) opened Resident 31's room door without covering her while her back and buttocks were exposed. This failure had the potential to cause embarrassment and feelings of low self-esteem (unhappy and thinking negatively about yourself) for the resident. Findings: Review of Resident 31's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a wound treatment observation, on 3/5/25 at 2:11 p.m., Resident 1 was lying in her bed, the first bed from her room door; the curtain was opened all the way, and the door was closed. LVN A turned Resident 1 to the side. Resident 1's back and buttocks were exposed and facing the room door. LVN A found that Resident 1 had bowel movement. Without covering Resident 1's body, LVN A opened the door and called the certified nursing assistant (CNA) to come to clean Resident 1. During the wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly obtain informed consent (permission granted in the knowledge of the possible consequences) for psychotropic medications (medications capable of affecting the mind, emotions and behavior) for three (Resident 20, Resident 4, and Resident 28) out of 14 residents. This failure had the potential to compromise the right of the residents or responsible parties (persons designated to make decisions of behalf of the residents) to be fully informed regarding care and treatment in order to make health care decisions. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 20's clinical record indicated he had a physician's order for Risperidone (medication used to treat mental illness that causes disturbed or unusual thinking, loss interest in life, and strong or inappropriate emotions) 0.25 milligrams (mg, unit of dose measurement) to be administered at bedtime for one week started on 3/1/25 until 3/8/25. A review of Resident 20's diagnoses included but not limited to unspecified psychosis [refers to a collection of symptoms that affect the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at the bedside for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 4). Resident 4 was not approved to self-administer medications. This deficient practice placed Resident 4 and other residents at risk for harm. Findings: A review of Resident 4's clinical record with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (disorder of the nervous system that causes tremors, stiffness, and slow movements), schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition including schizophrenia [mental health illness affects thinking, emotions, and behavior), mood disorders, Dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) with agitation. A review of Resident 4's Self-Administration of Medication Assessment form, dated 1/16/25, indicated that Resident 4 was not a candidate for self-administration of medications. During an observation of Resident 4 in her room on 3/3/25 at 9:01 a.m., the resident was sitting in her wheelchair, and a medication cup with five pills was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received the necessary care and services for three of 14 residents (3, 21, and 23) when: 1. Resident 3 was not served yogurt, tofu, orange, tangerine with his meals as ordered by the physician; 2. For Resident 21, rolled towels to his bilateral (right and left sides of the body) hands and offloading boots to his bilateral lower extremities were not applied as ordered by the physician; and 3. Certified nursing assistant C (CNA C) did not know about her resident, Resident 23. These failures had the potential to affect the residents' care and could jeopardize their health and well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 3's physician order, dated 1/31/25, indicated he had an order for the facility to provide yogurt, tofu, orange, tangerine with his meals. During an observation, on 3/4/25 at 12:45 p.m., Resident 3 did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were fully administered as prescribed for one of 4 residents (Resident 21) observed during medication pass administration. This failure placed Resident 21 at risk for ineffective treatment and potential health complications. Findings: During a medication pass administration observation on 3/4/25, at 4:10 p.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse D (LVN D) prepared Resident 21's medications for administration via gastrostomy tube (GT, tube inserted through the abdomen to deliver nutrition and medications directly to the stomach). LVN D crushed each medication separately, placed them into individual medicine cups, and added approximately 10 milliliters (ml, unit of measurement) of water per cup. After confirming that Resident 21 had 12 medications, LVN D administered each medication separately, flushing the GT with 10 ml of water between doses. However, medication residue remained in 6 of the 12 medication cups after administration. During a concurrent interview, LVN D confirmed that residue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and label medications and biologicals according to manufacturer instructions and facility policy. These failures had the potential for residents to receive incorrect or unsafe medications. Findings: During an observation on 3/4/25, at 3:50 p.m., in Station 2, while inspecting the medication cart with Registered Nurse E (RN E), the following issues were identified: 1. One unopened bottle of Latanoprost eye drops (a medication used to treat glaucoma, which is increased pressure inside the eye) for Resident 3 was found in the top drawer of the medication cart. The pharmacy label indicated that it should be refrigerated until opened, it was not stored in the refrigerator. 2. An inhaler Breo Ellipta (an inhaled medication to treat breathing problems) for Resident 15 was opened but did not have an open date indicated on the label. 3. One unopened Humalog (a fast-acting insulin used to control blood sugar) insulin vial (a small glass or plastic bottles used to store liquids, or powder medication) for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to explain the arbitration agreement (a contract requires that person who signed it resolve disputes by a neutral third party, rather than in court before a judge and/or jury) which Resident 23 and Resident 31 signed during their admission to the facility. This failure resulted in Resident 23 and Resident 31 signing the facility's arbitration agreement without their full understanding of the same. Findings: Review of Resident 23's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and he signed the facility's arbitration agreement on 1/20/25. Review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a clinical assessment tool), dated 1/9/25, indicated his cognition was intact. Review of Resident 31's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and she signed the facility's arbitration agreement on 1/22/25. Review of Resident 31's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated her cognition was intact. During an interview with Resident 23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 14) out of 14 sampled residents was free from abuse when staff shouted at and did not acknowledge Resident 14's statement for hunger. This failure had the potential to impact the physical and mental well-being of the resident. Findings: A review of Resident 14's clinical record indicated admission date of 6/8/2021 with diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia [decline in mental abilities, like memory, thinking, and reasoning], Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [a condition where the body either does not make enough insulin or cannot use insulin properly, leading to high blood sugar levels] with diabetic chronic kidney disease [occurs when high blood sugar levels from diabetes damage the kidneys' ability to filter waste and excess fluid] and, Major Depressive Disorder [a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest]. A review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 2/4/25, indicated a brief interview for mental status score of 12 [BIMS, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) received medications as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to compromise the resident's health and well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including cellulitis (a type of skin infection) and other disorders of the skin and subcutaneous tissue (the deepest layer of skin). Review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report indicated she had physician orders, dated 8/3/24, for the following medications: 1. Cleocin-T External Lotion (antibiotic lotion used to treat infection) 1% (unit of dose measurement) apply to affected areas topically (to the skin) two times a day for infection; 2. Mupirocin External Ointment (medication used to treat infection) 2% apply to affected area topically three times a day for infected skin; 3. Diclofenac Sodium External Gel (medication used to treat pain) 1% apply to affected area topically four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when there was no documentation that the nurse notified Resident 1's physician of multiple medications that were not administered. This failure had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to track and communicate care relevant to Resident 1. Findings: Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including cellulitis (a type of skin infection) and other disorders of the skin and subcutaneous tissue (the deepest layer of skin). Review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report indicated she had physician orders, dated 8/3/24, for the following medications: 1. Cleocin-T External Lotion (antibiotic lotion used to treat infection) 1% (unit of dose measurement) apply to affected areas topically (to the skin) two times a day for infection; 2. Mupirocin External Ointment (medication used to treat infection) 2%…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2) when: 1. Staff did not complete an SBAR (situation, background, assessment, recommendation, a communication tool) and did not notify the physician and the responsible party (RP, person designated to make decisions on behalf of a resident) when an altercation occurred between Resident 1 and Resident 2; 2. Licensed nurse did not do a skin assessment for Resident 1 when Resident 2 threw coffee on Resident 1; 3. Licensed nurses did not put Resident 1 and Resident 2 on alert charting (nurses on each shift closely monitor and document in the medical record for 72 hours about a specific condition) when an altercation between Resident 1 and Resident 2 occurred; 4. Staff did not follow up with Resident 2 following a room change. These failures had the potential to result in inadequate monitoring of the resident's conditions, and the potential to negatively affect the residents' health, safety and well-being.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman (resident advocate) was notified of discharges for three of three residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3). This failure had the potential to result in the residents not having someone to advocate for their admission, transfer, and discharge rights. Findings: Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated 4/22/24, indicated the facility informed Resident 1 that her insurance issued a last covered date of 4/25/24 (this indicated the insurance would not pay for Resident 1's stay in the facility after 4/25/24). Review of Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated 4/26/24, indicated Resident 1 was discharged from the facility at 10:50 a.m. There was no documentation in the Progress Notes that indicated the facility notified the Ombudsman of Resident 1's discharge. During an interview with the director of nursing (DON) on 5/31/24 at 12:39 p.m., the DON stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its Oxygen Therapy policy for two of three sampled residents (Residents 4 and 5) who used oxygen when: 1. Resident 4's nasal cannula (flexible tubing inserted into the nostrils and attached to an oxygen source) was unlabeled and undated; and 2. There was no No Smoking sign posted for Resident 5's room. These failures had the potential to compromise the residents' health and safety. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 4's medical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and had the diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure (a condition in which the respiratory system does not exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide properly). Review of Resident 4's Order Summary Report indicated she had a physician's order, dated 2/6/24, for oxygen to by administered via nasal cannula as needed. During observations on 5/31/24, at 11:52 a.m. and 1:23 a.m., Resident 4 was in her room receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. The nasal cannula was not labeled with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete records for controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse and addiction) when controlled medication use audit for three of six residents (Residents 13, 43, and 153) were not reconciled. The medications were signed out of the Individual Narcotic Record count sheet (an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications); however, they were not documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to indicate they were given to the residents. This failure had the potential for misuse or diversion (illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drugs or their use for purposes not intended by the prescriber) of controlled medications. Findings: On 10/17/23, six random Individual Narcotic Records count sheets for six residents were requested for review. Review of Resident 13's clinical record indicated he had a physician's order, dated 6/7/23 for tramadol (a potent narcotic for pain) 50 mg one tablet every six hours as needed (PRN) for pain. Review of the count sheet for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance to professional standards of food safety when: 1. Outdated graham cracker crumbs in a plastic container was stored in an active use area of the dry storage; 2. An ice chest containing ice was stored on the floor. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness for residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent kitchen observation and interview with the Dietary Director (DD) on 10/6/23 at 9:00 a.m., there was a plastic container containing graham cracker crumbs in an active use area of the dry storage. The container had a label that indicated, 7/17/23, UB [use by]: 9/17/23. The DD confirmed the graham cracker crumbs had passed its use by date. She stated it should be discarded. 2. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Registered Dietician Nutritionist (RDN) on 10/18/23 at 10:24 a.m., an 85-liter (L, unit of volume) ice chest was on the floor. The RDN confirmed the ice chest was on the floor and stated ice for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 34) received a replacement of her personal belongings when her bilateral (affecting both sides) hearing aids (small, wearable electronic device to facilitate better communication) were missing since the end of December 2022. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 34 to be without hearing aids for over nine months. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview of Resident 34's room on 10/16/23 at 9:55 a.m., Resident 34 stated she was hard-of-hearing and did not have hearing aids on. She stated her hearing aids were with the medication nurse. During an interview with certified nursing aide B (CNA B) on 10/18/23 at 9:23 a.m., she stated Resident 34 did not have hearing aids. CNA B stated Resident 34 was hard of hearing and she (CNA B) had to raise her voice when talking to Resident 34. During an interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse C (LVN C) on 10/18/23 at 9:47 a.m., she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow physician's orders when a licensed vocational nurse (LVN F) did not administer a medication to Resident 152 according to the physician's order for it. This failure resulted in Resident 152 to not receive the physician's ordered medication as prescribed. Findings: Review of Resident 152's Order Summary Report, dated 10/19/23 indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness and myocardial infarction (heart attack). It also indicated Resident 152 had a physician's order, dated 10/5/23, for Polyethylene Glycol 3350 powder (medication used to manage or treat constipation) Give 17 gram (g, unit of measurement) by mouth two times a day for constipation prevention. During an observation and concurrent interview on 10/17/23 at 4:30 p.m., LVN F poured polyethylene glycol powder into a cap of the container until it filled approximately halfway to the top of a white line. When asked how much…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 34) received assistive devices when when her bilateral (affecting both sides) hearing aids (small, wearable electronic device to facilitate better communication) were missing since the end of December 2022. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 34 to be without hearing aids for over nine months. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview of Resident 34's room on 10/16/23 at 9:55 a.m., Resident 34 stated she was hard-of-hearing and did not have hearing aids on. She stated her hearing aids were with the medication nurse. During an interview with certified nursing aide B (CNA B) on 10/18/23 at 9:23 a.m., she stated Resident 34 did not have hearing aids. CNA B stated Resident 34 was hard of hearing and she (CNA B) had to raise her voice when talking to Resident 34. During an interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse C (LVN C) on 10/18/23 at 9:47 a.m., she stated Resident 34 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 16), was provided Restorative Nursing Assistance (RNA; restorative care for individuals recovering from illnesses or injuries) services as ordered. This failed practice could result in decreases in mobility and complications for residents requiring RNA services. Findings: During an interview with Restorative Nursing Aide A (RNA A) on 10/19/23 at 9:29 a.m., she stated she works as an RNA 4 days a week on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays. She stated there was currently no other RNA for 27 patients. She stated about once a month for the past 6 months, she was pulled out of the schedule to work as a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant, an entry-level role that provides vital support to both patients and nurses). She stated some residents missed their RNA therapy when she was pulled out to work as a CNA. Review of Resident 16's clinical record, on 10/19/2023 at 1:37 p.m., indicated a physician's order, dated 8/17/2023, for RNA services four times a week for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a performance review for one of three certified nursing assistants (CNA) at least once every 12 months for CNA E. This failure resulted in a lack of evaluation and feedback related to CNA E's performance. Findings: Review of CNA E's personnel file indicated she was hired on 9/25/12 and had an employee performance review with competency assessments on 4/23/21. During concurrent interview and record review on 10/20/23 at 1:28 p.m., the director of staff development provided competency assessments for CNA E, completed on 8/26/23. The DSD stated it looked like there was no performance review/competency assessment completed for CNA E in the year 2022. Review of the facility's policy, revised 3/17/22 indicated, Competency assessments will be performed . annually . The annual evaluation of an employee will include review of completed competency assessments which may have been done throughout the year.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for pneumococcal vaccination for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 pneumococcal vaccine (vaccination to protect resident from pneumococcal disease) was not offered and not administered in accordance with the current Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations. This deficient practice had the potential for acquiring pneumococcal disease for Resident 1. Findings: Review of Resident 1's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 1 admitted to facility on 5/23/2023 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type 2 (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), sepsis (condition in which the body responds to an infection), and protein calorie malnutrition (deficiency of energy, protein and other nutrients causes measurable adverse effects on body function and clinical outcome). Resident 1 had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menu was followed for four residents (Residents #1, 14, 20, 33) on Regular Carbohydrate Controlled (CCHO) diets (diets designed for people with Diabetes to assist in keeping blood sugars within normal range). This failure had the potential to result in not meeting the nutritional needs thus further compromising the nutritional status of the residents. Findings: Review of the facility menu titled Winter Menus for Week 1 Monday 12/6/21 indicated for the CCHO Regular diet, the following items: Three Bean Chili 1 cup, Tossed [NAME] Salad ½ c (cup), Cornbread with [NAME] Chilies ½. During an observation of the lunch meal service on 12/6/21 starting at 11:56 a.m., Food Service Worker A (FSW A) plated food for Resident's 1, 14, 20, 33 in the presence of Registered Dietitian (RD). FSW A put one whole piece of cornbread on each of Resident's 1, 14, 20, 33 plates, and RD placed the plate cover on the plate on the tray in cart ready to go out to residents. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. Nursing refrigerators were out of temperature range two times in a week, 2. An air gap was not present in the food preparation sink, and 3. Food service equipment was stored wet. These failures had the potential to cause the growth of microorganisms which could cause foodborne illness or cross contaminate food (cross contamination occurs when unclean surfaces or utensils spread germs to food and can potentially cause foodborne illness) for the 47 residents eating at the facility. Findings: 1. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) in the presence of the Registered Dietitian (RD) by the nursing refrigerator (that holds resident food brought in by visitors) the DON stated the nurses are responsible for monitoring the temperatures of the refrigerator. During a concurrent record review at that time of a facility document titled Daily Temperature Record of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control procedures when: 1. Resident 3's oxygen nasal cannula (a device consisting a lightweight tube, split on one end into two prongs which are placed in the nostrils and from which a mixture of air and oxygen flows) was lying on her bed and not covered; 2. Certified nursing assistant J (CNA J) did not sanitize or wash her hands after touching the curtain and before feeding Resident 43; 3. Resident 43's syringe which was used to flush and administer the medications through his gastrostomy tube (GT, a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach; it can be used to give drugs and liquids, including liquid food, to the resident) was not changed daily; 4. Staff did not wear a gown while providing direct resident care in the yellow zone; 5. A housekeeper did not wear appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment such as gloves, gown, faceshiled, and goggles) and remove PPE properly while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-10 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability) screening document was accurately completed for two of two residents (39 and 43). This failure had the potential for mentally ill residents not to receive the required care and services. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 39's admission Record and physician orders indicated she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including psychosis (hearing or seeing things that do not exist, or believing things that other people do not) and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Resident 39 was prescribed aripiprazole (used to treat mental/mood disorders) 5 milligrams (mg, a metric unit of mass) daily for psychotic mood disorder, started on 4/4/21, and sertraline (used to treat depression) 25 mg daily for depressive disorder, started on 5/5/21. However, review of Resident 39's PASRR Level I Screening document, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the risk for fall care plan was implemented for one of two residents (43) by not placing the landing pad on the right side of Resident 43's bed for his safety. This failure had the potential for Resident 43 to sustain injury if he fell from his bed. Findings: Review of Resident 43's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, and osteoporosis (a disease that thins and weakens the bones). Review of Resident 43's Fall Risk Evaluation, dated 11/10/21, indicated he was at risk for fall. Review of Resident 43's physician orders, dated 12/6/21, indicated he had an order for a landing pad on the right side of the bed for safety and its placement was to be checked every shift. Review of Resident 43's care plan for risk for fall, initiated on 12/6/21, indicated a landing pad on the right side of the bed was one of the risk for fall interventions.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plan was revised for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 3), to include new intervention/s to prevent recurrence of elopement (wandering). This failure had the potential to present imminent threat to resident's safety. Findings: During review of Resident 3's clinical record, Resident 3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included dementia (memory loss), diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), and psychosis (mental disorder). During review of Resident 3's minimum data set (MDS, a resident tool assessment) dated 8/21/2021, indicated Resident 3 was moderately cognitively impaired, independent during activities of daily living (ADLS), and ambulates thru wheelchair. During observation on 12/08/21 at 3:45 pm, Resident 3 was alert, seated in her wheelchair, able to get up by herself, but had periods of confusion. Her Wander Guard was placed on the back of her wheelchair . During an interview with licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received the necessary care and services to attain and/or maintain their highest practicable well-being for two of twelve sampled residents (39 and 43) when: 1. Licensed nurses did not hold midodrine (used to treat low blood pressure) 10 milligrams (mg, a metric unit of mass) as ordered for Resident 39, when her systolic blood pressure (SBP, the pressure in the arteries when the heart beats) was higher than 130 millimeters of mercury (mmHg, a measurement of pressure); and 2. Physician's laboratory orders for Resident 43 were not done: prothrombin time (PT, a blood test that measures how long it takes blood to clot)/international normalized ratio (INR, a way of standardizing the results of prothrombin time tests, no matter the testing method), complete blood count (CBC, a blood test that helps to detect a range of disorders and conditions), comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP, it provides important information about the body's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a consistent process of drug reconciliation (maintenance of an accurate count) when incoming and outgoing licensed nurses did not consistently sign the controlled drug count document at change of shift, 13 times in 6 weeks (10/24/21 - 12/6/21) for one of two medication carts. This failure had the potential to result in the delay of identification of medication discrepancy (the difference in the actual count versus the recorded amount) and possible inappropriate use of controlled narcotic (drugs used to reduce pain, induce sleep and may alter mood or behavior) medication. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/06/21 at 11:10 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) E and the Director of Nursing (DON), LVN E, stated that the narcotic controlled drug count was conducted by two licensed nurses; and the document should be signed off by them at each change of shift. A review of the controlled drug count document with LVN E identified that it was incomplete, missing signatures/initials of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist's (CP) recommendations were acted upon for one of 12 sampled residents (39) when the CP indicated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c, a test measures the amount of blood sugar attached to part of the red blood cells that carries oxygen from the lungs to the rest of the body) and electrocardiogram (EKG, a test measures electrical signals in the heart; an abnormal EKG can be a sign of heart disease or damage) for Resident 39, and the facility did not present these recommendations to the physician. This failure had the potential for Resident 39 to receive unnecessary medication and to suffer unnecessary adverse side effects that could negatively impact her physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 39's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including psychosis (hearing or seeing things that do not exist, or believing things that other people do not) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 5.56% medication error rate when two medication errors out of 36 opportunities were observed during medication passes for two residents (Residents 2 and 32). These failures had the potential to compromise the residents' medical health. Findings: 1. During a medication administration observation and interview on 12/6/21 at 9:40 a.m., with Registered Nurse (RN) B, RN B administered the scheduled medications to Resident 2 at the scheduled medication pass. However, RN B did not administer the furosemide (a diuretic, used to treat fluid retention and swelling) 20 milligrams (mg, unit of measure). RN B stated she could not find the furosemide 20 mg which was due during this medication pass. She stated she would notify the pharmacy. A review of Resident 2's medical record indicated a physician's order, dated 6/28/21, for furosemide 20 mg by mouth, once a day for edema (swelling caused by excess fluid trapped in the body's tissues). The medication was scheduled to be administered daily at 9:00 a.m. During a follow-up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication and biologicals were stored and labeled appropriately when undated medications and an expired medication were found in the medication carts; and internal and external medications were not stored separately. These failures had the potential for residents to receive expired, incorrect, and unsafe medications. Findings: A. During an observation on [DATE] at 10:58 a.m. in Station 1 for medication cart review with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) E and the Director of Nursing (DON), the following were identified: 1. Two of two glucose test strip (a thin plastic strips that measures blood sugar) bottles were opened, not dated. 2. An eye drop medication, 3 bags of suppositories (solid but readily meltable cone or cylinder of usually medicated material for insertion into a bodily passage or cavity) and 2 nitroglycerin (used to prevent chest pain, placed under the tongue) bottles were stored in the same bin of the drawer in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-10 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure one kitchen staff had appropriate competencies when the staff did not know the correct final temperature for cooked chicken and did not calibrate three thermometers correctly. These failures had the potential to place the 47 residents who received food prepared in the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. Findings: a. During an interview on 12/6/21 at 10:14 a.m., Food Service Worker A (FSW A) stated she had been working here 30 years. During an observation of food preparation on 12/6/21 starting at 11:06 a.m., Food Service Worker A (FSW A) took temperatures of chicken coming out of the oven. During a concurrent interview at that time with FSW A, FSW A stated she is looking for 160 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) to make sure the chicken is cooked thoroughly. FSW A confirmed that if the final cooked chicken temperature was 160°F that the chicken would be fine to serve to residents. It was noted the cooked chicken temperatures were observed to be 180°F and 179°F. Review of facility policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 10 bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet per resident. Having less than 80 square feet per resident could potentially compromise the care and services the residents receive. Findings: The residents' bedroom measurements were as follows: Room Number Bed Capacity Square Feet per Resident 1 2 78 9 3 69 10 3 69 11 2 66 12 3 76 14 3 76 17 3 69 18 3 69 21 3 77 23 3 77 During the survey, residents were observed in their rooms. Nursing care and services were not negatively impacted by the shortage of space. During the survey, residents and staff were interviewed to determine if there were any concerns or issues with the lack of space. The residents and staff verbalized no complaints or concerns regarding space. Recommend continuance of room waiver.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 10 bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet per resident. Having less than 80 square feet per resident could potentially compromise the care and services the residents receive. Findings: The residents' bedroom measurements were as follows: Room Number Bed Capacity Square Feet per Resident 1 2 78 9 3 69 10 3 69 11 2 66 12 3 76 14 3 76 17 3 69 18 3 69 21 3 77 23 3 77 During the survey, residents were observed in their rooms. Nursing care and services were not negatively impacted by the shortage of space. During the survey, residents and staff were interviewed to determine if there were any concerns or issues with the lack of space. The residents and staff verbalized no complaints or concerns regarding space. Recommend continuance of room waiver.
- No harm found · Bcited before2021-12-10 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure ten bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet per resident. Having less than 80 square feet per resident could potentially compromise the care and services the residents receive. Findings: During observation on 12/07/21 at 1:45 p.m. , the residents' bedroom measurements were as follows: Room Number Bed Capacity Square Feet per Resident 1 2 78 9 3 69 10 3 69 11 2 66 12 3 76 14 3 76 17 3 69 18 3 69 21 3 77 23 3 77 During the survey, residents were observed in their rooms. Nursing care and services were not negatively impacted by the shortage of space. The closets and storage were sufficient to accommodate the needs of the residents. During the survey, residents and staff were interviewed to determine if there were any concerns or issues with the lack of space. The residents and staff verbalized no complaints or concerns regarding space. Recommend continuance of room waiver.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SOL HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOL HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 99% | since 02/04/2010 |
| MAJER, SOL | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/04/2010 |
| ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/04/2010 |
| DASARI, GOPIKA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/15/2025 |
| DAVIS, ALEXANDRIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2022 |
| RECHNITZ, SHLOMO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| EAST TERRACE-LET LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $641K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055388. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.