Oakland Healthcare & Wellness Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 116 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 77 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 94.7 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide preventive treatment and services to maintain and improve range of motion (ROM is one aspect of exercise important for increasing or maintaining joint function) for three of four sampled residents (Residents 6, 75, and 26).This failure had the potential to result in further decline in Residents 6, 75, and 26's ROM. 1.A review of Resident 6's admission record (AR), undated, indicated Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body, often the face arm, leg, usually from brain or spinal cord injury), diabetes, and repeated falls. A review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment screening tool used to guide care) dated 11/7/25 indicated Resident 6 with functional limitations in range of motion on one side of the upper extremity (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand) and one side of the lower extremity (hip, knee, ankle, foot). A review of the record of the last…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for safety when: Kitchen staff had uncovered facial hair while in the kitchen.Beyond use by date food items were stored in the kitchen refrigerator.Unlabeled, undated and expired food items were stored in the resident refrigerator. These failures had the potential for contamination of food resulting in food borne illness for the 97 residents who lived at the facility. During an observation on 1/12/26, at 9:24 a.m., the Dietary Supervisor (DS) had uncovered facial hair while in the facility kitchen. During an observation on 1/12/26, at 9:42 a.m., the kitchen refrigerator had cranberry sauce with a use by date of 12/27/25 and salad dressing with a use by date of 12/30/25. During an observation on 1/12/26, at 10:18 a.m., the resident refrigerator had a smoothie with an expiration date of 1/5/26, one pack of ready to eat chicken not labeled with resident name or date, one unknown food item not labeled with date, and one unknown food item not labeled with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 25 sampled residents (Residents 30 and 95) received nail care and shaved in accordance with their preferences.This failure had the potential to cause Residents 30 and 95 to feel embarrassed and undignified. During a review of Resident 30's admission Record, printed 1/15/26, the Record indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility in December 2025 with a diagnosis of need for assistance with personal care. During a review of Resident 30's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, is a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of eight to twelve is an indication of moderate impairment.), dated 12/9/25, the record indicated Resident 30's BIMS score was 12. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/12/26, at 11:41 a.m., with Resident 30, Resident 30 was observed with facial hair and long dirty finger nails. Resident 30 stated staff did not offer to shave or cut and clean…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely assessment and intervention to one of two sampled residents (Resident 95) when Resident 95 had a significant change in condition related to weight loss. This failure placed Resident 95 at risk for malnutrition (body does not receive enough nutrients), dehydration (insufficient body fluid), decline in functional status, and emotional discomfort. During a review of Resident 95's admission Record (AR), printed on 1/13/25, the AR indicated Resident 95 was admitted to the facility in October 2025 with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (brain tissue dies because it doesn't get enough blood) and depression (a serious mood disorder causing persistent sadness, loss of interest in enjoyable activities, and impacts daily life).During a review of Resident 95's Care Plan, revised on 10/27/25, the Care Plan indicated Resident 95 had potential nutritional problems related to diagnoses and body weight of 264 pounds (lbs.). The Care Plan further indicated a goal for Resident 95 to remain within 5% of 264 lbs. and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify significant weight loss and implement interventions for two out of four sampled residents (Resident 28 and 95).These failures had the potential to result in continuous, unplanned weight loss for Residents 28 and 95.1.During a review of Resident 28's admission Record, dated 1/15/26, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in the facility on 12/25/25 with an admission diagnosis of nontraumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage (bleeding under the brain's outer covering, occurring without significant head injury). During an interview on 1/12/26 at 11:46 a.m. with Resident 28, Resident 28 stated having difficulty chewing food and losing weight. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/15/26 at 9:19 a.m. with Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) 1, Resident 28's Weekly Weights, dated 12/29/25 and 1/5/26 were reviewed. The Weekly Weights indicated, Resident 28's weight the week of 12/29/25 was 134.4 pounds (lbs.), and the week of 1/5/26 was 123.2 lbs. RNA 1 stated giving a copy of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0836 — isolated
  Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an unusual occurrence report within 24 hours to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) when one of two sampled residents (Resident 4) had an unwitnessed fall and sustained lacerations (cuts) on the back of the head after being found and was sent to acute care hospital.This failure delayed regulatory oversight and placed Resident 4 at increased risk of repeated falls and additional injury, while also putting other residents at risk for similar harm. During a review of Resident 4's admission Record printed on 1/15/26, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in November 2025 with diagnoses of right femur fracture (broken leg), abnormalities of gait and mobility and mild cognitive impairment. During an interview on 1/12/26 at 3:23 p.m. with Resident 4, Resident 4 stated experiencing a recent fall that resulted in a laceration to the back of the head requiring two staples (metal clips used to close the wound). Resident 4 stated the fall occurred in the shared bathroom when a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 90 of 90 sampled residents were prevented from unauthorized visitor entry or resident exit from the facility when facility staff failed to close the alarmed emergency exit back door and arm the emergency exit alarm for 35 minutes during the evening shift. This failure had the potential to result in unauthorized visitor entry and/or unwitnessed resident elopements potentially resulting in resident injury. Findings: During an observation of the alarmed emergency exit back door on 10/17/24, at 1:00 p.m., the alarmed emergency exit back door was opened; there was no audible alarm. The door led to an access ramp with direct access to public streets. The access ramp was closed with an unlocked metal latch. During a continuous observation of the alarmed emergency exit back door on 10/18/24, at 6:40 p.m., the door was opened from 6:40 p.m. to 7:15 p.m.; there was no alarm audible. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/3/24, at 11:05 a.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1), an alarmed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure nursing staff possessed the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide nursing services to meet the residents' care needs safely for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1), when a Licensed Vocational Nurse(LVN), without an intra-venous(IV-a medical technique that involves administering fluids, medications, or nutrients directly into a vein) and blood withdrawal certificate provided care for Resident 1's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC- a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the upper arm and threaded into a large vein in the chest). This failure had the potential to result in improper infusion of ordered TPN (Total Parenteral Nutrition-a method of feeding that provides nutrients directly into a vein, bypassing the gastrointestinal tract) and cause infection and complications. During a record review of Resident 1's face sheet, printed on 8/27/24, the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted during May 2024, with diagnoses including: surgical aftercare following surgery on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure maintenance services to maintain a comfortable, sanitary, and homelike environment when: 1. For Resident 39, room had a missing window covering. 2. For Resident 41, bathroom sink hot water knob was not in good working condition. 3. For Resident 58, room window could not be closed completely. 4. Multiple rooms (Rooms 5, 6, 10, 11,1 2, 16, and 19) had unclean and unpleasant bathroom environments. These failures to ensure a homelike environment had the potential to decrease residents' quality of life, comfort, and well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 39's admission Record printed on 7/24/24, indicated Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 39's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to provide care), dated 7/12/24, indicated Resident 39 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool for a resident's orientation to time and capacity to remember. The BIMS score ranges…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four (Resident 32, 47, 57 and 67) of five sampled resident's Pre-admission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) was referred to the appropriate state mental authority for evaluation and determination when; 1. Facility did not resubmit a new Level 1 PASRR screening for Residents 32, 47, 67 that remained in the facility longer than 30 days. 2. Facility did not refer Resident 57 for level 2 PASRR evaluation. These failures had the potential to prevent residents from receiving appropriate required mental health services. Findings: 1. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment screening tool used to guide care), dated 5/22/24, indicated Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was coded zero-meaning, Resident 32 was not considered by the State PASRR process to have a serious mental illness. The MDS indicated Resident 32's diagnoses included undifferentiated schizophrenia ( a mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOL HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA